4) The Pluralists and The Sophists

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 14

  • @MirRaqeeb
    @MirRaqeeb 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Don't you think Anaxgorous when talking about seeds are actually proving the concept of actuality and potentiality.

  • @mushfiquetarafder4522
    @mushfiquetarafder4522 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Such an energetic teacher. 🙏

  • @MacSmithVideo
    @MacSmithVideo 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    the sophists are right (as Nietzsche picked up on later), though they'll never be popular with academics (as Nietzsche isn't).

  • @alancosgrove4728
    @alancosgrove4728 ปีที่แล้ว

    What books are you reading for this course and your other courses.?
    Have you also got a list of assignment questions for folks not actually in the class?

  • @reveranttangent1771
    @reveranttangent1771 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Air; hot and moist
    Earth; cold and dry
    Fire; hot and dry
    Water; cold and moist

  • @hadfgag
    @hadfgag 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    You mention referenecs to physics very often, do you have a background in physics at all, or is it just that these questions are of great interest to modern physics (and likewise the insights from physics can allow reinterpretation in philosophy)?

  • @dhende3
    @dhende3 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great class. My mind was blown many times. I think you are selling rhetoric and the ability to connect to people's emotions with words a bit short, though. There's a different type of truth in that, one that isn't necessarily relativistic. That said, I do agree that relativism isn't that interesting of a rabbit hole, although its consequences definitely make for some great literature.

  • @shlomobachar4123
    @shlomobachar4123 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It is like non-dualism (Advaita Vedanta).

  • @ajmosutra7667
    @ajmosutra7667 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where do the sofists start?

    • @louquay
      @louquay 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Late

  • @justinlevy274
    @justinlevy274 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Pretty uncharitable view of the sophists. All the great philosophers have systems they think are 'true' yet they all disagree with one another. It seems as though if 'truth' is out there, can be comprehended, and communicated that wouldn't happen. Instead we are still in the world of opinion or better phrased reasoned judgement. The use of 'truth' by these philosophers functions as a rhetorical device to attempt to persuade others judgement. Exactly what the sophists are on about.

  • @stephensugar6330
    @stephensugar6330 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Anaxagoras sounds a lot like modern quantum physics..........infinite possibilities at the quantum level, collapsed into the macro by a "mind"......the observer????