Simply superb. I just can't stop laughing. Such awesome sports. "True by definition" ; "we were on the verge and we are more on the verge now" .. hilarious. 😂
Cool - on many levels! A dialogue like this shows that there is hope for humanity. I'm always very glad to find people who are open-minded enough to do this - between 'rivals' and even in front of an audience. I would love to see strongly religious people do this, too, with their respective religions! Are there any examples our there?
@@maloxi1472 WHY AND HOW E=MC2 IS F=MA, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY: Time DILATION ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, as E=mc2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. Ultimately and truly, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. OVERLAY what is THE EYE in BALANCED RELATION to/WITH what is THE EARTH. Notice the black space of THE EYE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. THE DOME of a person's EYE is ALSO VISIBLE. Now, carefully consider what is the semi-spherical, translucent, QUANTUM GRAVITATIONAL, AND BLUE SKY. Great. E=mc2 IS F=ma. It is CLEAR. Time DILATION ULTIMATELY proves (ON BALANCE) that E=mc2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of what is THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light; as E=mc2 IS F=ma; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. The EARTH and the Sun constitute and comprise the MIDDLE AND THE FULL DISTANCE in/of SPACE (IN BALANCE) in full and BALANCED compliance and conformity with the CLEAR and universal fact that E=mc2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Great !!!!!! Hence, it is CLEARLY proven, in fact, that the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON NECESSARILY matches it's revolution. Great. Obviously, what is THE MOON is subject to and constitutive of both E=mc2 AND F=ma. E=mc2 IS CLEARLY proven to be F=ma. "Mass"/energy involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. This CLEARLY explains why objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. THE EARTH is ALSO F=ma AS E=mc2. The Sun is both F=ma AND E=mc2. The BLUE SKY is E=mc2 AND F=ma. What is THE MOON is NECESSARILY F=ma AS E=mc2. THINK. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. (BALANCE and completeness go hand in hand.) VERY IMPORTANTLY, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. Great !!! INSTANTANEITY is thus FUNDAMENTAL to what is the FULL and proper UNDERSTANDING of physics/physical experience, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. The INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of THOUGHT (AND description) is improved in the truly superior mind. (THOUGHTS ARE INVISIBLE.) GREAT. THE DOME of a person's EYE is ALSO VISIBLE. The balance of being AND EXPERIENCE is essential. The EARTH is ALSO BLUE (as water). Alas, the ULTIMATE unification of physics/physical experience combines, BALANCES, AND INCLUDES opposites; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. By Frank DiMeglio
"You cant even compute the standard models but we cant either" Lmfao. Amazing line right there. Dhows why both of these are still in their infantile stages of development and not quite full blown scientific theories yet.
"...because you are a bunch of ignorant particle theorists who don't understand general relativity..." The hipster dude, in full uniform even including sunglasses poked into thinning hair, thinks that that's a joke. Plain statement of fact actually....
Maybe they're both correct, like how light is a particle but also a wave. I personally prefer String Theory because it "could" elagantly describe everything in the universe. If it actually provided testable predictions. Or they could both be wrong, who knows?
So true. Physicists have funneled down current theories so much that even when someone creates something new, people dismiss it because it doesn't match up with what Einstein said.
"What to make of quantum gravity?" If X is to quantum gravity as Kepler's laws are to Newtonian mechanics, then what is X? "Everything happens as if MOND were the effective force law." - Stacy McGaugh www.astro.umd.edu/~ssm/mond/burn1.html "The MOND pages, Why Consider Mond?" www.astro.umd.edu/~ssm/mond/moti_bullet.html Milgrom's perspective on the Bullet Cluster "I was quite happy with the CCM, as everyone else ..." - Pavel Kroupa www.astro.uni-bonn.de/~pavel/kroupa_cosmology.html Pavel Kroupa: Dark Matter, Cosmology and Progress According to the work of Milgrom, McGaugh, and Kroupa, there are 2 possibilities: (1) Newton-Einstein gravitational theory is 100% correct but appears to be slightly wrong for some unknown reason. (2) Newton-Einstein gravitational theory really is significantly wrong. In case (1) I think there might be dark matter fermions which exhibit bizarre Fermi pairings across alternate universes. In case (2) what is the simplest way that general relativity theory can fail? In the standard form of Einstein's field equations replace the -1/2 by -1/2 + dark-matter-compensation-constant. Google "space roar dark energy".
WHY AND HOW E=MC2 IS F=MA, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY: Time DILATION ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, as E=mc2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. Ultimately and truly, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. OVERLAY what is THE EYE in BALANCED RELATION to/WITH what is THE EARTH. Notice the black space of THE EYE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. THE DOME of a person's EYE is ALSO VISIBLE. Now, carefully consider what is the semi-spherical, translucent, QUANTUM GRAVITATIONAL, AND BLUE SKY. Great. E=mc2 IS F=ma. It is CLEAR. Time DILATION ULTIMATELY proves (ON BALANCE) that E=mc2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of what is THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light; as E=mc2 IS F=ma; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. The EARTH and the Sun constitute and comprise the MIDDLE AND THE FULL DISTANCE in/of SPACE (IN BALANCE) in full and BALANCED compliance and conformity with the CLEAR and universal fact that E=mc2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Great !!!!!! Hence, it is CLEARLY proven, in fact, that the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON NECESSARILY matches it's revolution. Great. Obviously, what is THE MOON is subject to and constitutive of both E=mc2 AND F=ma. E=mc2 IS CLEARLY proven to be F=ma. "Mass"/energy involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. This CLEARLY explains why objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. THE EARTH is ALSO F=ma AS E=mc2. The Sun is both F=ma AND E=mc2. The BLUE SKY is E=mc2 AND F=ma. What is THE MOON is NECESSARILY F=ma AS E=mc2. THINK. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. (BALANCE and completeness go hand in hand.) VERY IMPORTANTLY, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. Great !!! INSTANTANEITY is thus FUNDAMENTAL to what is the FULL and proper UNDERSTANDING of physics/physical experience, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. The INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of THOUGHT (AND description) is improved in the truly superior mind. (THOUGHTS ARE INVISIBLE.) GREAT. THE DOME of a person's EYE is ALSO VISIBLE. The balance of being AND EXPERIENCE is essential. The EARTH is ALSO BLUE (as water). Alas, the ULTIMATE unification of physics/physical experience combines, BALANCES, AND INCLUDES opposites; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. By Frank DiMeglio
"Nothing is too wonderful to be true if it be consistent with the laws of nature" -Michael Faraday You see, at the end of the day, the theory that is correct is not the most believable one, the Universe doesn't care about our beliefs. The one that prospers is the one that can explain the Universe and its phenomenons with the most accuracy. It's the one that has more proof sustaining it and the one that can explain every single quirky aspect of its field. It doesn't matter what our human brain perceives as "believable" or "plausible", what it matters is the response we get from the experimental results and the mathematical consistency of the theory itself. Remember, Albert Einstein refused to accept the theoretical foundation of Quantum Mechanics because he BELIEVED nature could be predicted without resorting to probability. He was wrong because he believed... In science, we have to cast our beliefs aside, shut down our "common sense" (which is our perception of the everyday world) and focus on the proof, nothing else.
"It's true by definition." You just can't argue with that. Flawless.
First time seeing this. I had to comment, “Have you heard of the string landscape? Also known as the end of science.” That was funny.
"True by definition" is one of my favorite punchlines ever
This is one of the funniest videos I've seen in a long time, relaxes the tension a bit in the argument
Simply superb. I just can't stop laughing. Such awesome sports. "True by definition" ; "we were on the verge and we are more on the verge now" .. hilarious. 😂
More conferences should have this kind of finale.
Cool - on many levels! A dialogue like this shows that there is hope for humanity. I'm always very glad to find people who are open-minded enough to do this - between 'rivals' and even in front of an audience. I would love to see strongly religious people do this, too, with their respective religions! Are there any examples our there?
Jordan Peterson, Fr M. Goring, Jonathan Pageau, John Lennox ...
@@maloxi1472 WHY AND HOW E=MC2 IS F=MA, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY:
Time DILATION ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, as E=mc2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. Ultimately and truly, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY.
OVERLAY what is THE EYE in BALANCED RELATION to/WITH what is THE EARTH. Notice the black space of THE EYE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. THE DOME of a person's EYE is ALSO VISIBLE. Now, carefully consider what is the semi-spherical, translucent, QUANTUM GRAVITATIONAL, AND BLUE SKY. Great. E=mc2 IS F=ma. It is CLEAR.
Time DILATION ULTIMATELY proves (ON BALANCE) that E=mc2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of what is THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light; as E=mc2 IS F=ma; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. The EARTH and the Sun constitute and comprise the MIDDLE AND THE FULL DISTANCE in/of SPACE (IN BALANCE) in full and BALANCED compliance and conformity with the CLEAR and universal fact that E=mc2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Great !!!!!! Hence, it is CLEARLY proven, in fact, that the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON NECESSARILY matches it's revolution. Great. Obviously, what is THE MOON is subject to and constitutive of both E=mc2 AND F=ma. E=mc2 IS CLEARLY proven to be F=ma. "Mass"/energy involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. This CLEARLY explains why objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. THE EARTH is ALSO F=ma AS E=mc2. The Sun is both F=ma AND E=mc2. The BLUE SKY is E=mc2 AND F=ma. What is THE MOON is NECESSARILY F=ma AS E=mc2. THINK. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. (BALANCE and completeness go hand in hand.) VERY IMPORTANTLY, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. Great !!! INSTANTANEITY is thus FUNDAMENTAL to what is the FULL and proper UNDERSTANDING of physics/physical experience, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. The INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of THOUGHT (AND description) is improved in the truly superior mind. (THOUGHTS ARE INVISIBLE.) GREAT.
THE DOME of a person's EYE is ALSO VISIBLE. The balance of being AND EXPERIENCE is essential. The EARTH is ALSO BLUE (as water). Alas, the ULTIMATE unification of physics/physical experience combines, BALANCES, AND INCLUDES opposites; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy.
By Frank DiMeglio
"You cant even compute the standard models but we cant either"
Lmfao. Amazing line right there. Dhows why both of these are still in their infantile stages of development and not quite full blown scientific theories yet.
"...because you are a bunch of ignorant particle theorists who don't understand general relativity..."
The hipster dude, in full uniform even including sunglasses poked into thinning hair, thinks that that's a joke. Plain statement of fact actually....
I am looking forward to more discussions as such, very entertaining yet insightful.
Maybe they're both correct, like how light is a particle but also a wave. I personally prefer String Theory because it "could" elagantly describe everything in the universe. If it actually provided testable predictions. Or they could both be wrong, who knows?
This is the strangest rap battle I have ever seen.
This was great :) thanks for the post. You guys should post some more more often
This is the best thing i've seen all week.
Rovelli definitely won that one.
More like lost, but won because we know he was vouching for the opposite topic and hilariously.
@@HimanshuRohela he lost winningly and won in losing fashion
We are on the verge of discovering it for 25 years but now, now we are more on the verge of discovering it. LOL
Falsifiability? Fie!
real life sheldons and leonards! love it! :)
physics is really tough. we have reached a stage where doing something new is not easy.
So true. Physicists have funneled down current theories so much that even when someone creates something new, people dismiss it because it doesn't match up with what Einstein said.
So fun!
"What to make of quantum gravity?" If X is to quantum gravity as Kepler's laws are to Newtonian mechanics, then what is X?
"Everything happens as if MOND were the effective force law." - Stacy McGaugh
www.astro.umd.edu/~ssm/mond/burn1.html "The MOND pages, Why Consider Mond?"
www.astro.umd.edu/~ssm/mond/moti_bullet.html Milgrom's perspective on the Bullet Cluster
"I was quite happy with the CCM, as everyone else ..." - Pavel Kroupa www.astro.uni-bonn.de/~pavel/kroupa_cosmology.html Pavel Kroupa: Dark Matter, Cosmology and Progress
According to the work of Milgrom, McGaugh, and Kroupa, there are 2 possibilities:
(1) Newton-Einstein gravitational theory is 100% correct but appears to be slightly wrong for some unknown reason.
(2) Newton-Einstein gravitational theory really is significantly wrong.
In case (1) I think there might be dark matter fermions which exhibit bizarre Fermi pairings across alternate universes.
In case (2) what is the simplest way that general relativity theory can fail? In the standard form of Einstein's field equations replace the -1/2 by -1/2 + dark-matter-compensation-constant. Google "space roar dark energy".
Guys, what does Carlo Rovelli say exactly at 6:24? "Imagine..." what?
+Кин Кост +ENiGMA Imagine Chemistry did not exist..... He follows Dirac equation with chemistry, for obvious reasons
When brilliant minds screw around!!! Hilarious! :)
Extraordinary!
Yikes. Leonard didn't age well!
Sheldon's cool now? And funny?
He's worked on his humour.
Who was that in the photo?
Looked like Depak Chopra 😱
Guilherme Sadovski lol, so it is. Really didn't look like him but now I see it plain as day. My bad!
I simply loved this.
Hahahah love this format
this is beauty
o my god, the best laugh I've had in years.
Epic.
This is just too much fun!!!
Wow yo momma has changed
WHY AND HOW E=MC2 IS F=MA, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY:
Time DILATION ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, as E=mc2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. Ultimately and truly, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY.
OVERLAY what is THE EYE in BALANCED RELATION to/WITH what is THE EARTH. Notice the black space of THE EYE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. THE DOME of a person's EYE is ALSO VISIBLE. Now, carefully consider what is the semi-spherical, translucent, QUANTUM GRAVITATIONAL, AND BLUE SKY. Great. E=mc2 IS F=ma. It is CLEAR.
Time DILATION ULTIMATELY proves (ON BALANCE) that E=mc2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of what is THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light; as E=mc2 IS F=ma; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. The EARTH and the Sun constitute and comprise the MIDDLE AND THE FULL DISTANCE in/of SPACE (IN BALANCE) in full and BALANCED compliance and conformity with the CLEAR and universal fact that E=mc2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Great !!!!!! Hence, it is CLEARLY proven, in fact, that the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON NECESSARILY matches it's revolution. Great. Obviously, what is THE MOON is subject to and constitutive of both E=mc2 AND F=ma. E=mc2 IS CLEARLY proven to be F=ma. "Mass"/energy involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. This CLEARLY explains why objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. THE EARTH is ALSO F=ma AS E=mc2. The Sun is both F=ma AND E=mc2. The BLUE SKY is E=mc2 AND F=ma. What is THE MOON is NECESSARILY F=ma AS E=mc2. THINK. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. (BALANCE and completeness go hand in hand.) VERY IMPORTANTLY, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. Great !!! INSTANTANEITY is thus FUNDAMENTAL to what is the FULL and proper UNDERSTANDING of physics/physical experience, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. The INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of THOUGHT (AND description) is improved in the truly superior mind. (THOUGHTS ARE INVISIBLE.) GREAT.
THE DOME of a person's EYE is ALSO VISIBLE. The balance of being AND EXPERIENCE is essential. The EARTH is ALSO BLUE (as water). Alas, the ULTIMATE unification of physics/physical experience combines, BALANCES, AND INCLUDES opposites; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy.
By Frank DiMeglio
Thanks Frank I feel my mind expanding already
I love this idea. Lol I wanna watch this for every possible debate
hilarious😅😅😅
#Stringtheory vs #LQG / #loopquantumgravity REVERSED.
:)
Not my forte but..
String Theory or bust!
Boobs it is
never thought i'd laugh so hard at a science-y video!
i respect string theorists but i think personally string theory is a load of hooha and loop quantum gravity is just a little more believable
"Nothing is too wonderful to be true if it be consistent with the laws of nature"
-Michael Faraday
You see, at the end of the day, the theory that is correct is not the most believable one, the Universe doesn't care about our beliefs. The one that prospers is the one that can explain the Universe and its phenomenons with the most accuracy. It's the one that has more proof sustaining it and the one that can explain every single quirky aspect of its field. It doesn't matter what our human brain perceives as "believable" or "plausible", what it matters is the response we get from the experimental results and the mathematical consistency of the theory itself. Remember, Albert Einstein refused to accept the theoretical foundation of Quantum Mechanics because he BELIEVED nature could be predicted without resorting to probability. He was wrong because he believed... In science, we have to cast our beliefs aside, shut down our "common sense" (which is our perception of the everyday world) and focus on the proof, nothing else.
Thx ^^ this made me laugh :-D
That was just hilarious 😂
no such thing as hilariox or not, say any nmw s ok
Thumbs up!
lol, pretty nice imo
string theory is only game in town...
hahaha