Old school tie is still the most important aspect. Two examples: my former father-in-law had a lot of pressure put on him to join MI5 when he was a student at Oxford, despite the fact that he was a useless posh drunk. And a friend of mine who attended Eton school was recruited solely for that reason, and only afterwards were his MI5 handlers flabbergasted to learn that he could speak fluent Russian.
That was true in the past and both a strength and weakness (Philby etc), but no longer true. For example when I was a civil servant I had to undergo a day long security interview before I was allowed to work in a ministers office. The guy who interviewed me wasn't a posh boy from Oxbridge, but a charming fellow from the Irish Republic.
@@stevebarlow3154 Fair enough there, Ted. Although whatever the accents of the powers that be, I'm still not sure that they're all that reliable. For example, how was it possible for the UK security services NOT to foresee and prevent the recent racist riots? The people involved were hardly dastardly masters of disguise. Unless of course, it suited them for the riots to happen. That's possible, but on the road to conspiracist madness.
yeah the guy they interviewed is good but this channel is b grade af, messy setup, bad lighting, colour grading issues especially with the b roll. No love put into this at all, pump and dump effort.
@@holobolo1661 not what pump and dump means at all - you are literally on the internet, look it up. This is a fascinating interview with a dedicated public servant, and all you numpties make note of is the questionable stylistic decisions of the set and the quality of a 70 year old man's dry cleaner..?
@@RadagastTheBrwn It's called an analogy pal, "look it up, you're literally on the internet". Also look up "literally" while you're at it. We are not literally on the internet, we are browsing/accessing the internet. You clearly know very little about video production or interviewing techniques, nor much else apparently as you didn't even read the comment you replied to correctly. Just another moron with more mouth than brains, Dunning-Kruger in full effect. You are the target market of quantity over quality media like this.
@@RadagastTheBrwnhere’s a fact for you. People who work in intelligence are not public servants nor are they civil servants. They’re actually servants of the crown and work for the King. Same with Police too, it’s only civil servants who are public servants.
The 'situational awareness test' is very difficult. Add to that all the other parts of the initial application process and the background checks along the way. One isn't allowed to tell anyone about your application. One isn't told how you've done on each part of the tests, only 'you're on to the next part' or 'you've not been successful'. There are English, maths and reasoning tests, all to be done in a time sensitive manner. One also has the video questionaire phase, observational skills and a mixture of other tests. If you get through all that, you're invited to Thames House or MI6's HQ for interviews and further group test scenarios. Even if you pass all that and are invited to become an IO, you're under probation and part of a small team within a department. There are a plethora of roles within 5 and 6, from data analysis, auditors, electronics, security, language experts, carpentry, right to field operatives. Expect much paperwork and little in the way of car chases.
You do need several people to act as referees for you and obviously they have to know who you are applying to join. I think your wife/husband is allowed to be told, but they have to keep it secret.
One is only allowed one trusted person whom 5/6 may contact during the applications stages, to verify one's character/non drug usage/ personal details are correct (i.e. actually British etc) That person could be a long term partner, personal doctor etc. but even so, they aren't told who is contacting them, nor for what purpose. The applicant cannot tell anyone else about their application, ongoing stages or if/when one is given a role within the organisation. After becoming an IO, in any role, one is not allowed to discuss any manner of one's work, from colleagues to actual operations. The OSA should be adhered to at all times, even after leaving the service.
Fascinating interview but hard to follow. The answer starts before I even get a chance to read the question and I can’t have subtitles on cause it gets obstructed.
You guys remembered his shirt lapel and "untidy" appearance in more details than any other visual clues. He couldn't be bothered sorting them for a reason. Even if he doesn't need it now, the old habit of distracting people is still there 😊
You asked the question wrong: You needed to ask instead, "What's the operation you ran that was closest to a James Bond movie?" That's worth another video.
James Bond never worked for intelligence. He was an agent. That means he operated as he wished. So for instance if he was meant to acquire, gain access or sabotage he would be given a slush fund in order to make it happen. In the event he is killed it would not officially lead back to MI6. That is why you would see Bond Shmooze in Monte Carlo with an Aston Martin and dressed to the nines. Bond never really owned any of those things, they were all just material resources in order to penetrate a target. Someone who worked in intelligence is never going to tell you of any operational situations AKA Bond and they will say its all Hollywood but it isn't. Fact is stranger than fiction, Many successful business men today are not there for their smarts, they are capable assets.
@@strictlyyoutube6881 Ian Fleming, in real life, was in the SAS, the precursor to MI-6 (outside UK). He was "officially" assigned to the Royal Navy as a Commander (O5). Then recall before every "mission" Bond saw "M" who was head of MI-6 for his assignment. And, when Bond was not happy with certain directives from "M", he'd be told, if he did Not wish to do the particular mission, he could be reassigned to "the Fleet". As for Bond and Vegas or Monte Carlo, the series Always showed him winning tens of thousands, plus picking up a woman at the casino. (those tens of thousands in the 60's would be more like 500K plus today. The idea: Bond had extremely good luck. Perhaps his deceased parents were helping him at the casinos and from getting shot.
@@briandrake6881 Bezos is an asset due to national strategic importance to the American economy but he isn’t a James Bond type. In fact he is considered a vulnerable target. A James Bond type would be someone who can get on a business class flight without an entourage and security detail, someone if you saw you would forget.
@@TesterAnimal1 BBC: "A man has described how he fought off the London Bridge knifeman with a narwhal tusk before pinning him to the ground to help end the attack. Darryn Frost, 38, was seen in pictures confronting Usman Khan, 28, who was armed with two knives." I also know of Hezbollah agents in London. Not that MI5/6 want to know, but whatever.
Is this John Cleese from Monty Python ? His edge from his shirt is going upwards. Maybe a secret signal ? What does it mean ? 😂 Is it about shirt integrity ? Give me an appointment. So funny 😂😊
I have meditated on this for 20 years and when I tell you this you will not unsee it. There are no such thing as terrorists, everyone is a state actor.
Graduated Hopkins in 1988 and all the intelligence agencies DIA CIA, DISA, NSA, etc. were on campus trying recruit. I asked what the starting salary was at the time, and I think one of the recruiters said you'll start at a GS14, which at the time was $60 some K a year. I chuckled and walked away.
Service is the reward not the money. Although it would be nice if Governments worked harder to thank you by taking better actions rather than work to label you and undermine the sacrifices witnessed.
That was at least partly true, but personal qualities are what counts now. A lot of the staff at MI5 are female now, which wasn't the case in the past.
it's dumb to have very set very strict criteria on the "type" of history and characteristics a person should have, to be working on problem solving.. it's been proven that it is really good to get people from OUTWITH s field to look at problems as they think outside the box, and can see, or do, things that people within the field can't see/think like/do.. and people change through time.. People who were punks 20 years ago can be conservative now.. i bet loads of people who could be Great in those roles get rejected when really they'd be great assets to a company
We know. They roll through disaster after disaster and only secrecy protects them from the consequences of their extreme incompetence. Right through the Cold War the KGB headed up MI5 counter-intelligence section, for example (source: Peter Wright).
They don’t have a strict criteria on the type of person some should be. Only a base couple of things that most people in the industry have. There are people with all sorts of specialties and skills in intelligence agencies.
@@alannorthdevonuk763 The issue is, they've got blackmail material on recruits (because of this, none of them can go into politics "oh you like flight attendants tied up don't you") while the recruits have no blackmail material on THEM. That means the recruit's life is a daily reality of coercion and threat at the hands of their employer. Imagine you're in a DV interview. Guy's asking you questions and you're expected to answer them truthfully. You can't expect the same from him! So only a complete idiot or an academic would be suckered into this as a career. Result: recruit leaves after 5 years with real experience and knowledge of all sorts of things, with a fake CV about his history at an investment bank (while he knows nothing about investment banking but knows Arabic/Persian, uselessly).
'They' only signed-off on this interview because they knew he wouldn't reveal any national secrets because he couldn't. Why? Because I'm sure they knew from day one, as he seems like such a steady and 'nice' guy that he is the type they would make sure isn't told any national secrets.
This is the only place I find this information. For one moment, I thank you for providing. I'm looking for a British male or female pen pal through you tube that knows about the SAS involvement in the U.S. right now. I can't say much more.
@@CaboloNero simply not true, myths like these keep good people out of important jobs. Stop writing what you believe to be true, as if it was a fact you could prove with certainty.
@@CaboloNero100% not true. Most people that work in these agencies (especially the actual operators) are mostly from the military (SAS/SBS) who definitely wouldn’t of done Oxbridge.
MI5 would never put their agents at risk by putting them in a visible building where you can see them they hide away that's why they built this building because the enemy would say they would not spend all of that money building this building if they were not going to work there so they do and they put agents in there who are all enemy agents mostly Germans with British accent
tbh ............i can hardly stand the long history of war all round the world Britain has been given for centuries............... for the terrible state of our cuntrees now ................
Most of what Mr Bickford goes on about is internal security and counter-intelligence work. Either he was the legal director of MI5 for much longer than for MI6 or what MI6's does has a higher security clearance level and he cannot talk about it.
I wonder how the old hypocrite justified subcontracting the torture of suspects to less squeamish intelligence services. The famous quote: "Put plenty of sugar in your tea, you'll need it where you're going..."
Domestic security is in the toilet. Police say violent crime isn't their issue any more. mi? I'm not even getting started on what they're doing. Then there's the rest of the military and private actors and companies and political ones before even worrying about foreign ones. Agree that the world is more dangerous than at any point in my lifetime. Defend the state is now the wrong starting point; defend the people.
With due respect sir, I would like to drag your attention to the fact that NATO is the reason behind this war, Russia’s request to join NATO was declined everyone knows under who’s constant pressure, Russia is using Ukraine as a buffer state between NATO & Russia, the way China did with Tibet for India, speaking of China the west is failing to understand the fact that China is an economical supporter of this war so I think west should focus on supporters than on leader.
Old school tie is still the most important aspect. Two examples: my former father-in-law had a lot of pressure put on him to join MI5 when he was a student at Oxford, despite the fact that he was a useless posh drunk. And a friend of mine who attended Eton school was recruited solely for that reason, and only afterwards were his MI5 handlers flabbergasted to learn that he could speak fluent Russian.
That was true in the past and both a strength and weakness (Philby etc), but no longer true. For example when I was a civil servant I had to undergo a day long security interview before I was allowed to work in a ministers office. The guy who interviewed me wasn't a posh boy from Oxbridge, but a charming fellow from the Irish Republic.
@@stevebarlow3154 Fair enough there, Ted. Although whatever the accents of the powers that be, I'm still not sure that they're all that reliable. For example, how was it possible for the UK security services NOT to foresee and prevent the recent racist riots? The people involved were hardly dastardly masters of disguise. Unless of course, it suited them for the riots to happen. That's possible, but on the road to conspiracist madness.
@@stevebarlow3154yep much changed now. Got squaddies in 😅
@@stevebarlow3154 Yeah, probably a graduate of Trinity College, they have red brick universities there too.
@@RossBradley-vd5rc Very likely!
You could have straightened his shirt lapel before filming !
yeah the guy they interviewed is good but this channel is b grade af, messy setup, bad lighting, colour grading issues especially with the b roll. No love put into this at all, pump and dump effort.
@@holobolo1661 not what pump and dump means at all - you are literally on the internet, look it up. This is a fascinating interview with a dedicated public servant, and all you numpties make note of is the questionable stylistic decisions of the set and the quality of a 70 year old man's dry cleaner..?
@@RadagastTheBrwn It's called an analogy pal, "look it up, you're literally on the internet".
Also look up "literally" while you're at it. We are not literally on the internet, we are browsing/accessing the internet.
You clearly know very little about video production or interviewing techniques, nor much else apparently as you didn't even read the comment you replied to correctly. Just another moron with more mouth than brains, Dunning-Kruger in full effect. You are the target market of quantity over quality media like this.
@@RadagastTheBrwnhere’s a fact for you. People who work in intelligence are not public servants nor are they civil servants. They’re actually servants of the crown and work for the King. Same with Police too, it’s only civil servants who are public servants.
Cinéma vérité...lol...
I wish the questions were read out loud so I can listen to this without having to look at the screen.
It spoils the whole interview
UK - REFERENDUM ON MASS IMMIGRATION
@@mogadon7 Russia out of Ukraine and Syria.
The game is called - guess the question
Made me look. I was focusing on the 🎧
Don’t be so sad man, at least we have something to watch ❤
The 'situational awareness test' is very difficult. Add to that all the other parts of the initial application process and the background checks along the way. One isn't allowed to tell anyone about your application. One isn't told how you've done on each part of the tests, only 'you're on to the next part' or 'you've not been successful'. There are English, maths and reasoning tests, all to be done in a time sensitive manner. One also has the video questionaire phase, observational skills and a mixture of other tests. If you get through all that, you're invited to Thames House or MI6's HQ for interviews and further group test scenarios. Even if you pass all that and are invited to become an IO, you're under probation and part of a small team within a department. There are a plethora of roles within 5 and 6, from data analysis, auditors, electronics, security, language experts, carpentry, right to field operatives. Expect much paperwork and little in the way of car chases.
You do need several people to act as referees for you and obviously they have to know who you are applying to join. I think your wife/husband is allowed to be told, but they have to keep it secret.
"one".....lolol.
One is only allowed one trusted person whom 5/6 may contact during the applications stages, to verify one's character/non drug usage/ personal details are correct (i.e. actually British etc) That person could be a long term partner, personal doctor etc. but even so, they aren't told who is contacting them, nor for what purpose. The applicant cannot tell anyone else about their application, ongoing stages or if/when one is given a role within the organisation. After becoming an IO, in any role, one is not allowed to discuss any manner of one's work, from colleagues to actual operations. The OSA should be adhered to at all times, even after leaving the service.
@@TheOfficialMinistryOfTruth "one"....lololol
Bugger all that then … best picking a jail bird. Or a junkie. I’ve met a real spy and he was a lying manipulative nasty man!😮
Fascinating interview but hard to follow. The answer starts before I even get a chance to read the question and I can’t have subtitles on cause it gets obstructed.
That’s cause he’s too busy reading them 😭😭
He’s clearly still at it!!
You may retire, but you never leave the intelligence services.
@@johnwright9372 I’m getting frightened now as you tell me this having watched the near senile gentleman struggle his way through a short chat…
@@DaveSCameronhe’s not struggling he’s just choosing his words wisely
IDk man ....
He didnt mention how the mythical "far right" are the "biggest threat to the UK"....so probably not.
You guys remembered his shirt lapel and "untidy" appearance in more details than any other visual clues. He couldn't be bothered sorting them for a reason. Even if he doesn't need it now, the old habit of distracting people is still there 😊
You asked the question wrong: You needed to ask instead, "What's the operation you ran that was closest to a James Bond movie?" That's worth another video.
James Bond never worked for intelligence. He was an agent. That means he operated as he wished. So for instance if he was meant to acquire, gain access or sabotage he would be given a slush fund in order to make it happen. In the event he is killed it would not officially lead back to MI6.
That is why you would see Bond Shmooze in Monte Carlo with an Aston Martin and dressed to the nines. Bond never really owned any of those things, they were all just material resources in order to penetrate a target.
Someone who worked in intelligence is never going to tell you of any operational situations AKA Bond and they will say its all Hollywood but it isn't. Fact is stranger than fiction, Many successful business men today are not there for their smarts, they are capable assets.
@@strictlyyoutube6881 Ian Fleming, in real life, was in the SAS, the precursor to MI-6 (outside UK). He was "officially" assigned to the Royal Navy as a Commander (O5).
Then recall before every "mission" Bond saw "M" who was head of MI-6 for his assignment. And, when Bond was not happy with certain directives from "M", he'd be told, if he did Not wish to do the particular mission, he could be reassigned to "the Fleet".
As for Bond and Vegas or Monte Carlo, the series Always showed him winning tens of thousands, plus picking up a woman at the casino. (those tens of thousands in the 60's would be more like 500K plus today. The idea: Bond had extremely good luck. Perhaps his deceased parents were helping him at the casinos and from getting shot.
@@strictlyyoutube6881 Bezos?
@@briandrake6881 Bezos is an asset due to national strategic importance to the American economy but he isn’t a James Bond type. In fact he is considered a vulnerable target. A James Bond type would be someone who can get on a business class flight without an entourage and security detail, someone if you saw you would forget.
Deconstructing your life is a large segment of the recruitment process 👊🏻👊🏻👊🏻
Jackson Lamb’s proper older brother. 😂
It seemingly cuts out important bits like "will the UK experience another war"
Because the answer is obvious. Of course we will and we need him to tell us.
Told us nothing new!
UK is weak 😂😂😂😂😂
Brilliant interview
Love this.
"The target you lost sight of goes ahead and succeeds" oh yes, that RINGS A BELL. You want names?
Yes?
@@TesterAnimal1 BBC: "A man has described how he fought off the London Bridge knifeman with a narwhal tusk before pinning him to the ground to help end the attack. Darryn Frost, 38, was seen in pictures confronting Usman Khan, 28, who was armed with two knives."
I also know of Hezbollah agents in London. Not that MI5/6 want to know, but whatever.
Were you at Eton and then Oxbridge?
Yes.
When could you start?
Is this John Cleese from Monty Python ? His edge from his shirt is going upwards. Maybe a secret signal ? What does it mean ? 😂 Is it about shirt integrity ? Give me an appointment. So funny 😂😊
Anonymous, unremarkable, every day guy.
I have meditated on this for 20 years and when I tell you this you will not unsee it.
There are no such thing as terrorists, everyone is a state actor.
"Terrorists weren't being prosecuted". I can believe THAT bit. Nothing has changed.
For legal reasons, nothing to do with their religion.
He's no Jackson Lamb.
Graduated Hopkins in 1988 and all the intelligence agencies DIA CIA, DISA, NSA, etc. were on campus trying recruit. I asked what the starting salary was at the time, and I think one of the recruiters said you'll start at a GS14, which at the time was $60 some K a year. I chuckled and walked away.
Why did u walk away, isn’t that an amazing starting salary?
@eatsleeprunrepeat Nope, you'll never get wealthy working for the government.
@eatsleeprunrepeat US vs UK, the UK is paid very poorly & the US paid amazingly.
@@diesel92kj1 that’s true I think, I’m in the UK and being a civil servant no matter high up you are you won’t be very wealthy
Service is the reward not the money. Although it would be nice if Governments worked harder to thank you by taking better actions rather than work to label you and undermine the sacrifices witnessed.
Deeply troubling.
No discrimination but an old school tie helps
That was at least partly true, but personal qualities are what counts now. A lot of the staff at MI5 are female now, which wasn't the case in the past.
@@stevebarlow3154 thats their downfall.....
I'd actually do it, I might put an application in. I'd be really into it
Special man with alot of secrets!!
Fixes his mic but not his collar….for fucks sake what about when they framed the podium?
How is this helping the agencies.
Helps by - Building an Algorithm which allows the security boffins to track and profile who is watching this vlog
That shirt lapel is messing with my feng shui
Amazing
Wonder if he kept his OMEGA watch 😁
His collar is a decoy 🧐
Interesting...
Already hired by interpol in Europe 🇪🇺 after successful assessment and assignment. I don't know how MI 5/ MI6 related to interpol and FBI?
"Putin has his eye on Ukraine" - prescient.
Integrity: needed to bug a house. Got it
Five years waiting list to join unless they actually want you to join
If you actually want to be an agent you’re better off going through the military.
Evidence?
it's dumb to have very set very strict criteria on the "type" of history and characteristics a person should have, to be working on problem solving.. it's been proven that it is really good to get people from OUTWITH s field to look at problems as they think outside the box, and can see, or do, things that people within the field can't see/think like/do.. and people change through time.. People who were punks 20 years ago can be conservative now.. i bet loads of people who could be Great in those roles get rejected when really they'd be great assets to a company
We know. They roll through disaster after disaster and only secrecy protects them from the consequences of their extreme incompetence. Right through the Cold War the KGB headed up MI5 counter-intelligence section, for example (source: Peter Wright).
Do you want to employ a person in a sensitive position who, due to past indiscretions, could be compromised or open to blackmail?
They don’t have a strict criteria on the type of person some should be.
Only a base couple of things that most people in the industry have. There are people with all sorts of specialties and skills in intelligence agencies.
@@alannorthdevonuk763 The issue is, they've got blackmail material on recruits (because of this, none of them can go into politics "oh you like flight attendants tied up don't you") while the recruits have no blackmail material on THEM. That means the recruit's life is a daily reality of coercion and threat at the hands of their employer. Imagine you're in a DV interview. Guy's asking you questions and you're expected to answer them truthfully. You can't expect the same from him! So only a complete idiot or an academic would be suckered into this as a career. Result: recruit leaves after 5 years with real experience and knowledge of all sorts of things, with a fake CV about his history at an investment bank (while he knows nothing about investment banking but knows Arabic/Persian, uselessly).
@@RealMalta-fx4sx That was later proven false, though possibly successful Russian black propaganda. Peter Wright was a paranoid right winger.
It’s worth reading the book called The Big Breach on this topic.
Greetings
Sometime is good to be the Bear and feel you are in Alaska!
Back in the 70’s Bodie & Doyle had things under control.
I would dearly love to ask a question or two.
I see what you did there.
Hardly the Times crossword but OK.
Mi6❤
Big hands.
Nice freudian slip there, buddy. What United Kingdom do you refer to, five eyes?
'They' only signed-off on this interview because they knew he wouldn't reveal any national secrets because he couldn't. Why? Because I'm sure they knew from day one, as he seems like such a steady and 'nice' guy that he is the type they would make sure isn't told any national secrets.
That's a nice word. I would call it being nosey .
For me,
the movie [Spooks] was fantastic!
🇬🇧🛡
This is the only place I find this information. For one moment, I thank you for providing. I'm looking for a British male or female pen pal through you tube that knows about the SAS involvement in the U.S. right now. I can't say much more.
probably training with Delta Force, I mean they do it often and its not really a secret
@@willevans429 Thanks for the quick response. I appreciate the tip. I know that SFOD is no secret anymore either. They've become more transparent.
Why can’t you say more
Putin not going to stop at Ukraine 😂😂😂😂 keeping the war machine going..
10:07 Could be a 'post edit' to what he actually said!
in parts, what he says and what we hear, do not match.
Someone fix his collar please
THEY WOULD LOVE ME
He can’t even get his collar straight 😂
Couldn't lie straight in bed.
Does that matter? Really matter?
God can make you see nothing ahead of you when there's a whole battalion of soldiers there
Adjusts the mic & i am still straining to hear. Pity
If you want to join MI5 or MI6 you can simply apply on their website.
It isn't their website - it belongs to a front company. Their recruitment is also outsourced.
@@RealMalta-fx4sx OK. You can apply on the website.
If you want to be one you best get to Oxford or Cambridge
@@CaboloNero simply not true, myths like these keep good people out of important jobs. Stop writing what you believe to be true, as if it was a fact you could prove with certainty.
@@CaboloNero100% not true. Most people that work in these agencies (especially the actual operators) are mostly from the military (SAS/SBS) who definitely wouldn’t of done Oxbridge.
You get 7 chakras and the 3rd eye
I heard humans are more motivated by curiosity rather than fear. I wonder if that is true?
Ask him about " E Squadron "
shhhhhhhhhh
And when you’ve finished , they “bump-you-off” : like the ones in the Diana operation
Lol, one is living in Hereford 😊
It’s les Paterson !
MI5 would never put their agents at risk by putting them in a visible building where you can see them they hide away that's why they built this building because the enemy would say they would not spend all of that money building this building if they were not going to work there so they do and they put agents in there who are all enemy agents mostly Germans with British accent
These guys are never truly out of office, who at Joe is his mark? 😂
“Putin has his eye on Ukraine”
Shit Dave, you don’t say
ya and MI6/CIA/MI6/et al. have their All Seeing Eye on Ukraine too
Agree - talk about stating the obvious 🤨🤨👊🏻
MI5 is looking for potential spies with just one GCSE, providing the qualification is in English and it's a grade 4 or above.
“Labour-intensive” not “Labour-intense”
no discrimination whatsoever so long as you went to public school and studied at Oxford or Cambridge 🤣
brilliant so many levels 6.55 clothes adjustment for example
Huh?
Some cheap grammar mistakes on the written questions. Combined with cheap production, you’ve done this guy dirty.
100% agree. Could have been much better.
I wanna be a spy when I'm older if it's like tv
Do these people really work for ordinary folk or the status quo?
Got to 3.09 and shut down. I couldnt follow it.
Integrity 😂
Bueni, yo soy deselectira
What it would be like to be a fly on the wall and privy to such things.
mi5 dont know what a terrorist is these days. a big joke
I don't know how many of them have full compass, vertical and horizontal threat awareness I possess(ed). And it shows.
tbh ............i can hardly stand the long history of war all round the world Britain has been given for centuries............... for the terrible state of our cuntrees now ................
Most of what Mr Bickford goes on about is internal security and counter-intelligence work. Either he was the legal director of MI5 for much longer than for MI6 or what MI6's does has a higher security clearance level and he cannot talk about it.
Mi 5 help
Poor editing, LadBible do thees 10 minute interviews much better
I wonder how the old hypocrite justified subcontracting the torture of suspects to less squeamish intelligence services. The famous quote: "Put plenty of sugar in your tea, you'll need it where you're going..."
They are not agents, they are officers. This doesn't smell right..
What no double 0
Domestic security is in the toilet. Police say violent crime isn't their issue any more. mi? I'm not even getting started on what they're doing. Then there's the rest of the military and private actors and companies and political ones before even worrying about foreign ones. Agree that the world is more dangerous than at any point in my lifetime. Defend the state is now the wrong starting point; defend the people.
MI7
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Exactl
Somebody straighten his collar please! 🤨
Relax....for your operations : I am analyzing this video, and it seems to be heavily instrumentalized. Also, I noticed ,I've heard that voice twice!
Can't stop channel Dinghies
You get what you pay for, nothing more nothing less.
You can get more or less depending on the purchase. Beyonce's poo costs more than plain Jane's from next door but shit's still shit.
Just maths not psychological factors
No mention of Russian honey pots/traps
So many lies. Spooks NEVER change.
The Recruitment departments are as woke as fuck..that is the issue.
Looks like Maggie Smith.
Mi 5 come
Those random jump cuts from front on to profile shots is bloody annoying, and very amateurish.
With due respect sir, I would like to drag your attention to the fact that NATO is the reason behind this war, Russia’s request to join NATO was declined everyone knows under who’s constant pressure, Russia is using Ukraine as a buffer state between NATO & Russia, the way China did with Tibet for India, speaking of China the west is failing to understand the fact that China is an economical supporter of this war so I think west should focus on supporters than on leader.