Horten 9 V3, Horten IX V3 Modell, 229

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 60

  • @frro28
    @frro28 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    77 years later it still looks futuristic!

  • @leokimvideo
    @leokimvideo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Incredible how advanced Germany was with aircraft designs during WW2, decades ahead of any other country.

    • @themechbuilder6171
      @themechbuilder6171 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      indeed

    • @bobmetcalfe9640
      @bobmetcalfe9640 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Not so much in engine design though.

    • @themechbuilder6171
      @themechbuilder6171 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bobmetcalfe9640 they had JET ENGINES! no one had those right?

    • @bobmetcalfe9640
      @bobmetcalfe9640 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@themechbuilder6171 Er ... In fact yes, the British and German jet engines were developed at roughly the same time, but the British jet engines were far more reliable than the German ones by 1945 anyway.The British had operational jet fighters, (The Gloster Meteor} but they were not allowed to fly over Germany in case they fell into German hands, although it wouldn't have mattered at that stage.

    • @Slo-ryde
      @Slo-ryde 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Luckily all these weapons came out too late in the war for the Nazis….Hitler put the cart ahead of the horse.

  • @kampfkater8503
    @kampfkater8503 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ganz Klasse! Ich bewundere euch Modellbauer. Bei Modell-Flugtagen in Oberseifersdorf bin ich immer dabei!

  • @gunterbreitfeld6421
    @gunterbreitfeld6421 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Das schwierigste ist da die Schränkung der Flügel, da es die Roll geschw. u.a. beeinflusst und hatten die Hortens nicht auch Störklappen eingebaut. Jedenfalls meisterhaft berechnet und nachgebaut. 👍

  • @stumac869
    @stumac869 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Imagine seeing one of those flying around during the war, you'd have thought aliens were invading.

  • @yelleryoung5870
    @yelleryoung5870 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What a wonderful aircraft.

  • @rangermcq6802
    @rangermcq6802 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That was great! Thank you gentlemen.

  • @neboskii8756
    @neboskii8756 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    It's cool how a plane can still be maneuverable with multipurpose ailerons only its just the controls are different and the internal systems are different

  • @marienfeld07
    @marienfeld07 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Beeindruckend und wunderbar, nur in Deutschland. Es sieht aus wie ein aktualisierter Jäger.

  • @MrAviatorr
    @MrAviatorr 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    i hoff i gseh das tolle projekt mol live super sach Fred

  • @reineroel77
    @reineroel77 10 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Klasse gemacht

  • @pascalfust1035
    @pascalfust1035 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Ohne Seitenruder muss das Flugzeug aerodynamisch perfekt konstruiert sein - ich hoffe, dass dies die einzige Bauchlandung dieses schönen Modells geblieben ist

  • @stevenheller1978
    @stevenheller1978 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Wow Respekt

  • @adamgardiner5869
    @adamgardiner5869 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Tiny 1/12 scale England was looking very nervous when this took off.

    • @SpaceTravel1776
      @SpaceTravel1776 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Eh, it wasn’t enough to stop the 1/12 scale Russian army so doesn’t matter anyway.

    • @steffenrosmus9177
      @steffenrosmus9177 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@SpaceTravel1776 without lend and lease the Red Army would have been nothing.

  • @Bayan1905
    @Bayan1905 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I would like to see a larger scale RC like this tested to see kind of radar signature it has, to see if it really was the first stealth aircraft.

    • @atomicskull6405
      @atomicskull6405 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They don't need to computer modeling would do a much better job of that.

    • @Murphy5-5
      @Murphy5-5 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Northrup Grumman did build a 1:1 dummy and actually tested the remains of the original prototype and it is infact much harder to detect by radar than any other plane from that era. I don't know the radar signature but they compared it to getting detected 2:30 minutes before reaching britain oposed to the 19 minutes of the actual planes that fought in the battle of britain

    • @georgechristoforou991
      @georgechristoforou991 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      It wasn't stealth by design. It was only stealth by lack of metal to build planes at the end of the war.

    • @Murphy5-5
      @Murphy5-5 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@georgechristoforou991 Infact it was, they used carbon between the wood layers to refract the radar waves

    • @TinyBearTim
      @TinyBearTim 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It was it had a smaller radar because it’s a flying wing

  • @Zhonguoria
    @Zhonguoria 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Schöne flugzeug

  • @johnutting9615
    @johnutting9615 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great attempt,just the landing gear to have fully operational

  • @mickcarson8504
    @mickcarson8504 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    What happened to the wheels?

  • @davidmyhrahistorian
    @davidmyhrahistorian 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Gothaer Waggonfabrik was bombed twice in 1944 by the USAAF's 8th Air Force B-17s and B-24s. First in February 1944 and then again in July 1944. So after it was bombed back to the stone age where were the Ho 229's built? Evidence shows that the three prototypes were built in one of Dr.-Ing. SS General Hans Kammler's caves and that he canceled the entire Horten project on 17 March 1945. There was never a Gotha Go 229. Check it out.

    • @porterfred
      @porterfred  8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi David, Thank you for your comment. I belive the same that the GO229 was never a project name of this plane. But many documentation name the Horten IX as GO 229. This title are only because to have this name also in the youtube search string.

    • @andik859
      @andik859 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Die Prototypen wurden in den Hallen der Göttinger Autobahnmeisterei gebaut.

    • @valiant-thor-24
      @valiant-thor-24 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes David, we checked it out. After your heroic pilots made their excellent job bombing Germany - especially the centers of all german cities - "back to the stone age" there was nothing. Never. There were never the best tanks of the world, there were no Type 21 U-boats, never A9 up to A15 rockets, of course there was never an atomic bomb, no nuclear reactor, no flying discs, no gigantic underground-facilities where american soldiers never put even one step inside - until TODAY. And they never will. And so on.... Yes, dear american buddy David, all that NEVER happened. - Last notice: Ho IX and Go 229 means the same warplane. Check it out. The next Horten-plane they worked at was the Ho 18 AMERICA-bomber. Lucky United States. This of course never happened too.

  • @wolfganggugelweith8760
    @wolfganggugelweith8760 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Mann! Wenn das der dicke Hermann wüsste oder sooooo!!! 👆👆👆👆👆

  • @norberthofer5830
    @norberthofer5830 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Super cool

  •  9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Das wunder!

  • @geoffballe8766
    @geoffballe8766 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent

  • @АлександрБурсин-п7м
    @АлександрБурсин-п7м 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Что, при посадке у него шасси не вышли и поэтому сел на брюхо?

  • @reconforsales7708
    @reconforsales7708 ปีที่แล้ว

    What possessed these builders to make such an ugly plane- no wonder the sightings of UFOs has increased.

  • @Minong_Manitou_Mishepeshu
    @Minong_Manitou_Mishepeshu 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    3-D print that for a drone, only with turbo props. 😜

  • @hanskurtmann6781
    @hanskurtmann6781 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Well its how the yanks made the B2.

  • @escanor2405
    @escanor2405 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Schöne ackerlandung^^

  • @frankhernandez6883
    @frankhernandez6883 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    ]3eautiful

  • @SuperTrumpMAGA
    @SuperTrumpMAGA 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    German Engineering !!!!😀

  • @benediktolgun2690
    @benediktolgun2690 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    sieht nicht wirklich aus wie das original..

  • @vitorhorter3307
    @vitorhorter3307 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Design hihspeed

  • @CarlosFuentes-fk8md
    @CarlosFuentes-fk8md 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Problemas con el tren de aterrizaje

  • @Tbonyandsteak
    @Tbonyandsteak 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Bad balancing, others had done it better

  • @marcysss93
    @marcysss93 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Amerikabomber

    • @in1213
      @in1213 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      marcysiek schönes Flugzeug, aber Krieg ist ein Verbrechen. Übrigens, wenn der Krieg etwas länger gedauert hätte, wären die Atombomben hier runtergekommen.

    • @sachse_855
      @sachse_855 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ney ney das haben die Nazis damals 1945 schon gehabt. Die scheiß Amy haben es nur kopiert. Wäre dieses Flugzeug in Serie gegangen hätten die Nazis eine Megawaffe gegen die Engländer gehabt. Es war auch in Plan noch ein größeren Typen zu bauen und ihn mit Atombomben zu bestücken die über New York abgeworfen hätte können. Also nix Amerikabomber. Diese Pisser können nur kopieren mehr nicht.

    • @Marco187Polo
      @Marco187Polo 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Deutscher Patriot Die Horten 18, eine größere Version der Horten 9 wurde Amerikanomber genannt, weil der Amerika bombardieren sollte. Deswegen hieß er Amerikabomber und nicht weil die Amis Nurflügler-Bomber haben.

    • @georgechristoforou991
      @georgechristoforou991 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The RQ-170 Sentinel

    • @wilfriedhaas4127
      @wilfriedhaas4127 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@in1213 tja, siehst Du, und hätten wir die Horten 3 Jahre früher gehabt hätte sich kein Amibomber mehr hergetraut, aber was soll die Diskussion? Aber vielleicht findest Du B17 Modelle besser, weil die das mit Flüchtlingen vollgestopfte Dresden abgefackelt haben,, obwohl dieses bekannt war. Verschon die Leute doch mit deinen Belehrungen.