"Don't believe everything you see on the internet" - Mark Twain "Mark Twain didn't say that!" - Genghis Khan "How could Genghis Khan even know who Mark Twain is?" - Julius Caesar "Other than Mark Twain, why are any of us even speaking English?" - Socrates
Anyway your Mark Twain quote doesn't actually apply to this situation since his killing move was completely rational. The queen was attacking his knight and bishop at the same time and he had no way to save them both. It makes perfect sense he would take a pawn and check him with the bishop, giving him a move to bring the knight to safety, as that saves one of them and gets him as much material as he could have gotten for the other. The final move should have been completely expected.
@@joshuahietala5174 you, maybe, me as Russian - ain't gonna 🤣 🇷🇺🍸 However, your surname sounds kinda Finnish, in this case you might be as well good at drinking.
Chess, but whenever your opponent moves a piece, you have to move the next piece alphabetically. Bishop, King, Knight, Queen, Rook. Pawn moves give you free choice.
I looked up en passant after this and holy crap how does a move that insanely complicated exist. Can't wait to blow my dad's mind when I use it in our next chess game :)
It started when they changed the rules so that pawns could move 2 spaces their first move to speed up the start of the game. This had the side effect that an aggressive pawn's threatened square can get skipped, en passant allows you to take the pawn anyway, basically undoing the rule change in this instance to not upset older strategies.
that literally means that he will have to find a way to mate with only his pawns edit: nvm, i didnt read it right, he said to sacrafice the minor pieces, so simp can keep his queen and rook, it will be an easy checkmate
I interpreted this ruleset as “you must move the same piece unless you can’t, which then you can move any piece” as that makes the game winnable. The problem with this version is piece advantage actually negatively impacts you and endgames become draws. Would have been more interesting to see the other way.
The person realized you were moving the same pieces as them for the entire game, so it made sense he used his bishop at the end to capture the pawn and check your king, as you didn't have a bishop to capture that bishop that means he won as the 3rd victory condition is... if your opponent cannot move the same piece as you they also lose on top of all the current standard rules.
However if you want... you can make "King" always trump the rule if checked but only if checked! Otherwise "Any Piece" that can check your King, if you don't have the same piece to remove that piece well... it always will be lost...
@@sarainiaangelsong440 I think you're giving the 235 from Uruguay too much credit. Imo, it's more likely that he simply saw both his bishop and knight were attacked so he decided to sacrifice one.
When I was a child I had a friend who always beat me at chess. The only time I won was when I wanted to annoy him by copying his movements for 10 or so turns at start. He got confused and couldn't figure out a strategy to win.
I don't think that is so much of a "what the f..." this time. It's certainly not the best move but he doesn't want to lose a piece for free so he fires off the desperado bishop. Pretty decent response from a 200!
The "what the f..." came because he needs to move a bishop, but the only legal moves are with the king, so the only option was to resign or loose the challenge.
@@JDAxonn Yes I'm aware of how the challenge works. The point that I'm making is that Simp says "what the f..." when the opponent makes a move that makes no sense at all. This one isn't a great move but it still makes some kind of sense so it's probably not the most "what the f..." you're going to see on the channel.
I'm not sure it's not the best move. I think it in fact is. He has no way to save the knight AND the bishop, so he did what allowed him to save one of them, and get the most valuable material possible for the other. I don't know if it's really the best, you could feed the position into stockfish, but I wouldn't be a bit surprised if it turned out that WAS the best move.
This is a ridiculously easy challenge. Against an opponent with only a 100 rating, it's really easy to get a material advantage, and then just offer a draw.
it's actually quite easy to do. if you take all their pieces then you can corner the king and stalemate or just lose on time or just feed the other king
I think the spirit of this challenge was missed on this one. Should read "move the piece the opponent moved unless it's check or you don't have that piece". This makes much more sense and doesn't force you into an auto-loss, which would defeat the purpose of even positing the challenge in the first place
Unfortunately I don't think that was the spirit of the challenge. It says "have to" and didn't leave room for any other interpretation. I am confident the poster was perfectly happy posting an unwinnable challenge.
Im curious if the opponent noticed it The king at the beginning was a bit hinting but to be honest I wouldnt have figured that out if I had no other clue
I really like watching these challenges, the change in thinking with different rules is very interesting. Like with this challenge, you can't just play like normal - you have to consider what your moves will make the opponent do, and then plan your future moves depending on what you predict your opponent will move.
Since the video ended when he was checked, i can't imagine how bad of a beating the opponent took after that as payback for all the suffering chess shrimp went through
As long as it lives and can be moved legally. And with exception for the king. But it applies to pawns. Optionally - to make it harder - if a pawn, bishop, knight or rook is gone or can no longer be moved, then if another piece or pawn of the same type can be moved, it must be. Pawn promotion counts as a move by the post-promotion piece.
What was Simp's win condition, anyway? The only two ways Simp could've captured a piece in theory was if white moved that piece onto a square controlled by its counterpart or if white blundered a piece for multiple turns. If Simp captured white's pieces, he would've lost the ability to move those pieces. So at best Simp is functionally hoping for a trade. If Simp starts closing in on white's king, his turn economy goes away since Simp would end up moving his own king. Seems to me that the only was Simp was going to win is if white blundered a checkmate in 1 or got intimidated and resigned. I guess the theory of it, a paid actor who was aware of the challenge and trying to lose could've played: W: F3, B: E4, W: G4, B: G6, W: C3, B: B6, W: QC2, B: QE2, W: QD1, B: QH4. IE they would've had to modify the Fool's Mate in order to get it to work.
Chess, but you have to to move the piace a generator says in the next move (on the first move you can choose what you have to move) And if you can't move the piece TH-cam dies.
@2:44 If he had done Bishop B4 instead of Bishop F8, then he could have gone Pawn B5, making it so if White captured the bishop, he'd capture the queen
At first, I didn’t understand why the video ended but then I realized that it was check and he has to move his king and can’t move his bishop legally and even if he does, the king gets captured which is basically checkmate lol 😂
“The best swordsman does not fear the second best. He fears the worst since there’s no telling what that idiot is going to do.”: Mark Twain
But then if the worst beats the best who is truly the best?
"As with every other clever quote, it is attributed to Mark Twain" -Mark Twain
"Don't believe everything you see on the internet" - Mark Twain
"Mark Twain didn't say that!" - Genghis Khan
"How could Genghis Khan even know who Mark Twain is?" - Julius Caesar
"Other than Mark Twain, why are any of us even speaking English?" - Socrates
Anyway your Mark Twain quote doesn't actually apply to this situation since his killing move was completely rational. The queen was attacking his knight and bishop at the same time and he had no way to save them both. It makes perfect sense he would take a pawn and check him with the bishop, giving him a move to bring the knight to safety, as that saves one of them and gets him as much material as he could have gotten for the other. The final move should have been completely expected.
@@catlover.triangleheadprod4887 The best of course
Fun drinking game: take a shot every time he says “is kinda forced”
Lmfao
You would die
@@joshuahietala5174 you, maybe, me as Russian - ain't gonna 🤣 🇷🇺🍸
However, your surname sounds kinda Finnish, in this case you might be as well good at drinking.
Now liking your comment is kinda forced
That's very agressive
chess, but everytime your opponent moves a piece, you also have to move a piece.
idk man, seems kinda tough
Chess, but every time your opponent makes a move, you also have to make a move.
chess, but if your opponent wins you have to lose, and if you win you have to make the opponent lose (unless its a tie).
@@towelfn4320 this is actually a legit rule, if pawn =/= piece
@@mareksroka5629 I know but it just doesn’t seem very tough compared to some other limitations
Let's let him play normal chess for once. If simp loses, the video ends.
Yes please
He is playing vs 100 elos and is clearly 1000-1400 rated... he isn't going to lose
@@blueplayer6197 hes not gunna smurf then
@@blueplayer6197 He has a win against 1900 elo player
@@blueplayer6197 he will eventually
"and with that i have castled my king with my queen"
this absolutely killed me
How was he in mate at the end there was so many options
He didn’t lose the game, he lost the challenge. There’s no way to move a bishop and get out of that check.
Mate
or ☑
He finally made the 200IQ move predicting your rules
200elo*
@@divergentclouds 40elo*
Chess, but whenever your opponent moves a piece, you have to move the next piece alphabetically. Bishop, King, Knight, Queen, Rook. Pawn moves give you free choice.
Then you get a guy like this that only moves pawns lmao
The video will end immediately if he is Black and opponent leads with a Knight
@@DharshM0 He always makes allowances for if the video would end before it's physical possible for him to follow instructions
o god
@@DharshM0 Game starts
White: starts with Knight
Black: resigns
I expected the opponent to randomly move their king when yours was totally blocked in :D
Same :)
I expected the opponent to end the video on move 5 by developing their bishop right after Simp blocked his in with the queen.
"The french move" is one of my favorite maneuvers in chess, its so highly specific but still manages to be very useful in many games
I just wish it wasn't forced
holy hell
google the french move
All gangsta, until the opponent gives a check with a knight
I looked up en passant after this and holy crap how does a move that insanely complicated exist. Can't wait to blow my dad's mind when I use it in our next chess game :)
It started when they changed the rules so that pawns could move 2 spaces their first move to speed up the start of the game. This had the side effect that an aggressive pawn's threatened square can get skipped, en passant allows you to take the pawn anyway, basically undoing the rule change in this instance to not upset older strategies.
I’m slightly disappointed that you went with “holy crap” and not “holy hell” in this comment.
@@GrizonII it’s the game that keeps on giving!
@@Mrvin5434 holy fucking shit balls
Google castling
I was honestly expecting all of the moves to be mirrored, but this actually turned out to be more entertaining
You have to sacrifice all your minor pieces whenever possible, only after that may you check or mate the opponents king
that literally means that he will have to find a way to mate with only his pawns
edit: nvm, i didnt read it right, he said to sacrafice the minor pieces, so simp can keep his queen and rook, it will be an easy checkmate
I would like but its at 69 so my hands are tied..
Damn, ngl the run was absolutely FORCED
Fr
Not that I enjoyed you losing, but how it ended was fantastic. Definitely got a good laugh out of me.
I interpreted this ruleset as “you must move the same piece unless you can’t, which then you can move any piece” as that makes the game winnable. The problem with this version is piece advantage actually negatively impacts you and endgames become draws. Would have been more interesting to see the other way.
so what happens after every "wtf" moment? do you resign so you stay at low elo? or do you play on anyway?
Asking real questions
Obviously he resigns so that his elo remains near to 100
I'd say half the time he tries to win and half the time he resigns. Like that he stays around 100
@@londegel 100 is the lowest, you cannot go below it
@@indiegala281 so?
The person realized you were moving the same pieces as them for the entire game, so it made sense he used his bishop at the end to capture the pawn and check your king, as you didn't have a bishop to capture that bishop that means he won as the 3rd victory condition is... if your opponent cannot move the same piece as you they also lose on top of all the current standard rules.
However if you want... you can make "King" always trump the rule if checked but only if checked! Otherwise "Any Piece" that can check your King, if you don't have the same piece to remove that piece well... it always will be lost...
@@sarainiaangelsong440 I think you're giving the 235 from Uruguay too much credit. Imo, it's more likely that he simply saw both his bishop and knight were attacked so he decided to sacrifice one.
When I was a child I had a friend who always beat me at chess. The only time I won was when I wanted to annoy him by copying his movements for 10 or so turns at start. He got confused and couldn't figure out a strategy to win.
The answer to that is to just make a move that can't be copied.
Someone did that to me so i led them to one of the simplest mates in chess
@@bendaonfire0078 scholars mate?
@@shiv-em-all most likely cus it was my fav as a kid i dont remember which one was it
I don't think that is so much of a "what the f..." this time. It's certainly not the best move but he doesn't want to lose a piece for free so he fires off the desperado bishop. Pretty decent response from a 200!
The "what the f..." came because he needs to move a bishop, but the only legal moves are with the king, so the only option was to resign or loose the challenge.
@@JDAxonn Yes I'm aware of how the challenge works. The point that I'm making is that Simp says "what the f..." when the opponent makes a move that makes no sense at all. This one isn't a great move but it still makes some kind of sense so it's probably not the most "what the f..." you're going to see on the channel.
Exactly simp big mistake was pushing the guy
I'm not sure it's not the best move. I think it in fact is. He has no way to save the knight AND the bishop, so he did what allowed him to save one of them, and get the most valuable material possible for the other. I don't know if it's really the best, you could feed the position into stockfish, but I wouldn't be a bit surprised if it turned out that WAS the best move.
If it's "certainly" not the best move, by all means, tell me what you think was the best move from the position at 5:51.
Chess but every move with a Knight on the a-file, Simp eats a spoonful of salt
100 rated chess, but you have to get a draw by any way. Draw by agreement is allowed
That's pretty easy right? Just win all your opponents pieces and then feed all of your pieces to their king
This is a ridiculously easy challenge. Against an opponent with only a 100 rating, it's really easy to get a material advantage, and then just offer a draw.
Even if by agreement is not allowed, you can still eat all the oponent pieces and stalemate, 100's do that all the time
it might be hard on a 3 minute blitz game since the opponent can run out of time faster than stalemate
it's actually quite easy to do. if you take all their pieces then you can corner the king and stalemate or just lose on time or just feed the other king
"And with that, I have castled my king with my queen" -- Simp, Sep 2021
I think the spirit of this challenge was missed on this one. Should read "move the piece the opponent moved unless it's check or you don't have that piece". This makes much more sense and doesn't force you into an auto-loss, which would defeat the purpose of even positing the challenge in the first place
Unfortunately I don't think that was the spirit of the challenge. It says "have to" and didn't leave room for any other interpretation. I am confident the poster was perfectly happy posting an unwinnable challenge.
Im curious if the opponent noticed it
The king at the beginning was a bit hinting but to be honest I wouldnt have figured that out if I had no other clue
I love how the music in the beginning is perfectly in time with the pictures switching
I really like watching these challenges, the change in thinking with different rules is very interesting. Like with this challenge, you can't just play like normal - you have to consider what your moves will make the opponent do, and then plan your future moves depending on what you predict your opponent will move.
Finally, a format where bongcloud is the best move!
I'd love a full soundtrack of the la la la lalala la la
google "at the fair- the green orbs"
@@Lance0 thank you
Man that was brutal to watch. I was wincing when he captured with his bishop haha
Chess, but your every alternate move is a pawn move
Chess, but all your pawns and opponent's pawns have to be gone from the board, before the checkmate.
You can only do 1 move checkmates LMAO
The subtitles think about pawn p***
Lol
I love how searching music matches the face changing speed on the right
"but there's a chance he knows about the french move"
I did this a while back. Opponent said “this is ridiculous” and quit.
Chess, but oppenent move pawn, you move piece. Oppenent move piece, you move pawn
Chess but u can only move ur Queen
Since the video ended when he was checked, i can't imagine how bad of a beating the opponent took after that as payback for all the suffering chess shrimp went through
If your opponent plays e4 the video ends
I think check should have been granted an exception
Chess, but when you move a piece, you have to move that same piece once again next turn
As long as it lives and can be moved legally. And with exception for the king. But it applies to pawns. Optionally - to make it harder - if a pawn, bishop, knight or rook is gone or can no longer be moved, then if another piece or pawn of the same type can be moved, it must be. Pawn promotion counts as a move by the post-promotion piece.
I really enjoy how he missed that move when it was legitimately mate in 1. But when it blundered a bishop instead he was all over it.
100 rated chess but every piece can only move one square (except for the knight)
"the French move"
Having trouble getting En Passant in the TTS?
5:54 the *happy music stops* moment there, was perfection
You have to alternate between moving a pawn and moving something other than a pawn.
You can only move your pawns the first 10 moves
If you can capture opponent's piece (or a pawn), you must make a capture.
That’s just how I play chess
the fact that he still made the request say "or pawn," despite the request already saying it applies to pawns
It was actually longer than I was expected! Great job Simp! :D
Chess but you cannot capture any pawns
Cheeky parashockx music in the queue
Chess Simp: Everything is going as planned
*Knight moves*
Chess Simp: That's not in the plan.
the music at the start is called "at the fair"
TH-cam reccomend me to watch bongcloud opening after watching this video.
Chess, but if you have less than 5 possible moves, the video ends
Make it 10
What was Simp's win condition, anyway? The only two ways Simp could've captured a piece in theory was if white moved that piece onto a square controlled by its counterpart or if white blundered a piece for multiple turns. If Simp captured white's pieces, he would've lost the ability to move those pieces. So at best Simp is functionally hoping for a trade. If Simp starts closing in on white's king, his turn economy goes away since Simp would end up moving his own king. Seems to me that the only was Simp was going to win is if white blundered a checkmate in 1 or got intimidated and resigned.
I guess the theory of it, a paid actor who was aware of the challenge and trying to lose could've played: W: F3, B: E4, W: G4, B: G6, W: C3, B: B6, W: QC2, B: QE2, W: QD1, B: QH4. IE they would've had to modify the Fool's Mate in order to get it to work.
Good points! Must be pinned
Imagine he resigned and that guy was like:Yea;that was a good move.
every time your opponent moves a pawn you have to move a piece < not pawn> every time they move a piece you have to move a pawn < not piece>
I genuinely think this guy actually caught on to the gimmick
I think he might have realized what you were doing.
Chess, but you have to to move the piace a generator says in the next move
(on the first move you can choose what you have to move)
And if you can't move the piece TH-cam dies.
He did something like this in a previous video
@@joaooliveira9852 bug whit the generator he know the next move not te present move.
@@rinni8157 That's what you mean by next? I wasn't clear.
Wow I almost forgot the original soundtracks you used. Throwback
LMAOOO The pain 😂😂 all those tactics only to get checkmated in the end WOW!
"finally, my experience playing at 100 elo rating paid off !" lmao this line killed me
that final move makes no sense whatsoever, low elo is comedy gold
I did this challenge before this video existed.
Chess but you're copycatting your opponent for 3 moves, then a free move, repeat.
This is REALLY gonna effect my recommendations lol
1:22 was a good laugh. oh my. I'm dying.
Chess but whenever your opponent moves the video ends
That anemy last move is kinda stupid but smart in the same time
Should have played knight a5 to put pressure on the queen
Chess but you move only the king
Here's a challenge for you: play prohibition chess: no checks allowed, only checkmate
Chess, but you can only move your knights and pawns.
@2:44 If he had done Bishop B4 instead of Bishop F8, then he could have gone Pawn B5, making it so if White captured the bishop, he'd capture the queen
Chess, but if you don't move your pawns, you move your queen
Chess, but every time your opponent blunders, you have to blunder too.
"So Hanging mate is kinda forced..."
"King e1 is forced, since I have the black pieces."
I think it worked, I think he got so scared by both your move and the time ticking down that he totally blundered his bishop
Chess but if a peice is hung and stockfish thinks it is a blunder , you switch to lichess
Chess, but if you lose your opponent wins, and vice versa
The amount of time you can play something very good but you can't
New challenge:if you get checked,the video ends
I love how he says “again… aggressive
so basically the game ends when he gets a check
Chess but you have to be 1 piece (or pawn) up every 5 moves
I’m gonna use your name for a project
@@Kippi9o7... Ok ? I hope your project doesn't involve identity thief lmao
chess but you have to resign if your opponent moves a pawn
A pawn is a piece... A minor piece, but a piece.
I like how you erased part of the proposal lol
Woah ! Move 2: you must move the d-pawn.
After he stopped recording, he started to beat the shit out of his opponent
No one:
This guy every move: This is kinda forced
You play normal chess, but you can't smurf
At first, I didn’t understand why the video ended but then I realized that it was check and he has to move his king and can’t move his bishop legally and even if he does, the king gets captured which is basically checkmate lol 😂
5:55 Mission failed, we’ll get them next time.
Wait I don't get it, can't they still move the king?
@@littleshell7335 but he have to move bishop that he can't move
@@crazyedit1499 Ooohhh, I see. -I forgot there's supposed to be a challenge there-