Behind the scenes at NASA's Artemis Mission Control
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ส.ค. 2022
- Ahead of its historic launch, Mark Strassmann goes inside NASA's Artemis Mission Control in Houston, Texas.
#news #nasa #artemis
Each weekday morning, "CBS Mornings” co-hosts Gayle King, Tony Dokoupil and Nate Burleson bring you the latest breaking news, smart conversation and in-depth feature reporting. "CBS Mornings" airs weekdays at 7 a.m. on CBS and stream it at 8 a.m. ET on the CBS News app.
Subscribe to “CBS Mornings” on TH-cam: / cbsmornings
Watch CBS News: cbsn.ws/1PlLpZ7c
Download the CBS News app: cbsn.ws/1Xb1WC8
Follow "CBS Mornings" on Instagram: bit.ly/3A13OqA
Like "CBS Mornings" on Facebook: bit.ly/3tpOx00
Follow "CBS Mornings" on Twitter: bit.ly/38QQp8B
Subscribe to our newsletter: cbsn.ws/1RqHw7T
Try Paramount+ free: bit.ly/2OiW1kZ
For video licensing inquiries, contact: licensing@veritone.com
Why does this only have 76 likes!? This needs more attention! Space is awesome!
Not when nasa is behind it ! Wasting our tax dollars! Space x blows garbage nasa away!
Yeah we might fail, but better to fail while trying to bring humanity to the stars instead of fighting pointless wars
There's nothing worth visiting for humans within light years from here.
Look at all the internet “experts” saying space isn’t real, too expensive, etc 🤣
Meanwhile, the roads where I live are riddled with potholes.
Nasa is completely useless! Space x blows the away!
Is CBS News Covering this live?
I'm sure
1:40 Console computers running Windows 10 but main screen of control room running Windows XP?
IT WAS FINE TO MEET YOU SIR THANKS FOR ALL YOU. DO THERE AT NASA AND. FOR giving us. Information on what. Its. All. About have a great weekend and. A. Great. MONDAY. AS WELL. ROBBIE PHILADELPHIA PA. FISHTOWN
We did this before, and then our politicians didn't care and scrapped a very good program. We could have done all this and more 40 years ago. It is exciting that we are doing it again though, probably with a non-existent budget.
They have spent billions upon billions on the Artemis program. Total waste of money.
@@povertyspec9651 Artemis program cost $53 billion in 2021-2025.
US defence budget just in 2023 $816.7 billion.
mhm, i can't believe they're wasting so much taxpayer money in going to space, no wonder there's so much poverty in america.
It's FLAT!
Ad Astra
Yeah, those Missies are some pretty 'arty' people. Can they cook or can they cook?
awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww I miss Uncle WALTER CRONKITE
1916 - 2009
His child-like enthusiasm for the space program was contagious. Mercury, Gemini, Apollo - he explained it all so well and made you feel like a part of it.
I was just reading more about Mr Cronkite. His last night as CBS Evening News anchor was March 6, 1981. Believe it or not, they had a mandatory retirement age of 65 at that time.
I DO AS WELL I REMEMBER THE GENTLE MAN AS WHEN HE ANNOUNCED THE NEWS. NO MATTER WHAT THE TOPIC MAY BE HE TOLD IT TO US AND YOU FELT IT IN SLRT OF A WAY. ROBBIE PHILADELPHIA PA FISHTOWN
🥺
Start date: August 29, 2022
Rocket: Space Launch System, Block 1
Location: Kennedy Space Center
Names: Artemis I; Exploration Mission-1 (EM-1)
Manufacturer: Boeing; Airbus Defence and Space; Lockheed Martin; Northrop Grumman; Aerojet Rocketdyne; Jacobs
Spacecraft: Orion CM-002
Mission duration: 39-42 days (planned)
Same big players that procrastinate and over charge for materials. Waste of time and money if you ask me
Thanks
L'uomo non è mai stato sulla luna, andare sulla luna è come finire nelle sabbie mobili : è impossibile decollare dalla luna perché col vuoto (quasi) assoluto il sistema propulsivo una volta finito l'appoggio del suolo non avrebbe dove appoggiare la spinta, la navicella rimarrebbe ferma .la gravità lunare è tutt'altro che debole (vediamo con le maree che vengono alzate enormi masse d'acqua), dunque un decollo dalla luna risulta materialmente e scentifcamente non possibile
Ma c'è un altro problema che è la lentezza con cui la luna ruota su se stessa , 28 giorni per una rotazione attorno al proprio asse ,in pratica il campo gravitazionale lunare prevale abnormemente sulla forza centrifuga molto debole fornita dalla rotazione , la lentezza con cui ruota su se stessa frena praticamente tutti gli oggetti catturati,che finiscono prima o poi per impattare al suolo,che è il motivo per il quale vediamo sulla luna un infinità di crateri, in pratica il vettore dovrebbe rimanere nell'orbita più esterna possibile ed entrarvi alla velocità maggiore possibile e rimanerci quanto meno tempo possibile per non essere rallentato troppo e rischiare di precipitare, sganciare il modulo di atterraggio e ripartenza che una volta sganciato inizierebbe esclusivamente causa assenza di un'atmosfera ad accelerare finché i retro razzi non interagiranno con il suolo in pratica quanto più sarà pesante il modulo tanto maggiore sarà l'accelerazione, essendoci il vuoto quasi assoluto qualsiasi timone o sistema propulsivo non ha ragione di funzionare ,in pratica il modulo di atterraggio potrebbe ribaltarsi ,piegarsi di lato ,iniziare a roteare etc senza che nulla possa essere fatto dall'equipaggio per rimediarvi , per questi motivi mandare degli uomini sulla luna vuol dire mandarli incontro a morte certa
Get help
@@ExposeAntarctica studia!
Get your head out of the sand
From July of 1969 to December of 1972, the USA sent 6 missions to the Moon and 12 men walked there. Four of those men are still alive.
Tell nasa to hire you
There are abundance richness , all the planets, sun, moon, belongs to my mighty father the king of the universe, without my permission i wouldn't let anyone to grab it.
If they fail, everyone is gonna ask the question why did we spend $22 Billion for a rocket that doesn't work? Or $26 Billion for a spacecraft that doesn't work... even if they succeed, people are already asking this question and those voices will become very loud after Artemis 3 when SpaceX eclipses everything NASA ever did by landing a full fledged Starship on the Moon with Humans.
Might be why NASA is partnering-up with SpaceX to handle the service station and lander bits of the mission. Working independently, SpaceX would probably have mining ops and condos on the Moon before NASA got there.
As it is, I wouldn't be surprised if SpaceGomer and SpaceGoober wind up sitting at Elon's Grocery, Gas, and Lander Rental waiting for Artemis III's 2025 arrival that ultimately happens in 2032, if not canceled entirely.
Because space isnt real.
@@ExposeAntarctica You reckon Artemis is gonna punch a hole in the firmament and let the Upper Sea drown the lot of us?
Maybe if you stop invading and wasting so much on the military
The Starship you see in concept art will not be landing on the Moon. It's clickbait that goes viral among people who know nothing about micro-g fluid dynamics. NOBODY has transferred hundreds of tons of propellant in LEO, and SpaceX has done nothing to demonstrate this. Their lander will be derived from the Dragon capsule. It will use expendable ascent and descent stages that need to be replaced for each landing. And they will be launched on a version of Starship with an expendable upper stage. If SpaceX had not flown astronauts to the ISS on Crew Dragon by the end of 2020, they would not have received the lunar lander contract. Nothing I have said is false. If you feel otherwise, it is because you are too high on Elon's tweets to see sense.
Looking forward to the launch Monday. I did see Kamala Harris will be there... I am sure she will bring some luck to the launch. (sarcasm)
The flight director seemed very concerned about the heat shield, like he didn't have confidence in the shield. We've been returning spacecraft for decades and I would think that technology would be sound. The capsule design is quite similar to the Apollo design. I don't know, now I'm worried 😕
Good point. But it's their job to worry about everything. I think the heat shield will be just fine. It'll be interesting to see. Can't wait for Monday.
I think the Orion capsule is a good bit bigger than the Apollo capsules. This changes it's terminal velocity and creates new engineering challenges.
Coming back from the Moon is harder then coming back from low earth orbit. The velocity is much higher.
@@JohnnyThund3r At least nine Apollo capsules made it back from the Moon.
@@rajvader and Orion is not Apollo
The guy who is leading this launch back to the moon doesn’t sound right !!!
Lol people still think space and all of this nonsense is real.
Artemis fartemis
Space is not real? Do you believe in the sky? The Moon, the stars, the planets?
Stop saying you have exclusive access many TH-camrs have already had exclusive access to starship and Artemis CBS is not important news anymore
CBS has exclusive access to NASA, always has. In fact CBS is the only TV space news worth watching. Do you even know who Walter Cronkite is? Because Everyday Astronaut is the Walter Cronkite of are generation.