"Revocation of Will Case" | Supreme Court Judgment 2021 | Indian Succession Act 1925.

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 34

  • @lawyerjituburman1527
    @lawyerjituburman1527 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    No Will would be treated as revoked if not superseded by similar Will/ codicil witnessing by two persons as mandated. Will is a single' man's deed/ act and therefore no agreement where other parties sign any document with testator for effecting property distribution later (without witnesses as madated in Will making) can not be treated as new Will/ codiil.

  • @Fuddu668
    @Fuddu668 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir tastator unknown person ka nam will bana sakta hei

  • @boi295
    @boi295 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Akhil bhaiya jord o wot....from samarth 😘😘❤️🎉

  • @sahilarora5319
    @sahilarora5319 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have a doubt. At 0:30 vaha aapne subsequent agreement ke according kaha ki will revoke nhi ho skti, pr end pe 3 methods jo aapne batae uske according 1st method mai aapne likha execute another will ho to old wali will revoke ho jaegi....ye dono same lg rhe. Plzz clear the doubt

    • @legalabstract6187
      @legalabstract6187  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It is not the same in case of WILL it is permitted that another WILL can revoke the previous WILL. But section 70 did not talk about any revocation which can be done with the help of a subsequent agreement and that's why revocation through subsequent agreement is not possible.

    • @sahilarora5319
      @sahilarora5319 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@legalabstract6187 new WILL aur subsequent AGREEMENT alag alag hai kya....yahi samaj nhi aa rha

  • @srimathurasundarajan3393
    @srimathurasundarajan3393 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    it will be more useful to understand when you add english captions or use more english words.

  • @nishataneja5822
    @nishataneja5822 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir can you pls clear whether succession act supersedes the 2015 amendment in Insurance act. Or not.

  • @pavip3099
    @pavip3099 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What if during the senile age period which is between 65 to 75 years, if the testator is a female and often not well due to recurrent parallysis, dementia, brain haemorrhage - stroke, is on frequent blood transfusions, undergone brain surgery, has diabetes, blood cancer, severe anaemia, thrice leg fracture but still insists the care taker to get will deed from her and as medical fitness is a must to write a will, care taker waits for good health of testator to do a will but testator after 3rd time leg fracture expires at the age of 72? But testator had given complaint in taluka magistrate who is called tahasildar on stamp paper that during 1st leg fracture, twi daughters had forcefully taken her signatre on sm papers during her admit state in a hospital, carried on stretchers to an office on first floor

  • @vaishalitrivedi611
    @vaishalitrivedi611 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir I want to know about ancestral property divison ...would u plz tell about it .🙏

  • @स्वागत-द2घ
    @स्वागत-द2घ 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    please give me information about what is the Time limit for challenging the will deed in the court?

  • @sahilarora5319
    @sahilarora5319 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Plzz make a video on the re beru beri case

  • @sanudas9187
    @sanudas9187 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can the viewers hear the lectures in English

  • @vasudhakattenagaraj5582
    @vasudhakattenagaraj5582 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    How can a registered will be revoked,

  • @pavip3099
    @pavip3099 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome.

  • @parminderkaur3434
    @parminderkaur3434 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    🙏❣️🙏

  • @samarjeetdwibedy370
    @samarjeetdwibedy370 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I want to know why will a person be giving the will on any other person,s name if his own family members are trying to steal the property on grounds of fake accussations for helpings drugy sons and daughters who are frivolously inclined as per their professional careers in their entire life , and there are sons and daughters of that person who are the main property holders ,of that person , and why will a person be giving his own property to some other person , rather than giving it to his own sons and daughters , and talks are going on about will , I know how people started this conversation and why this topic now , I want to know why people from judiciary not penalising people who had ruined their husband,s property , on account of saving drugy sons and nasticily inclined daughters as per their behavioural attires are concerned , for faking the property papers and for not giving to sons who need that property , they are not dividing it ,they are not putting any names of the sons and the daughters , and why will any daughter be given the property , if daughters have bank accounts with huge amount of corrupt money ,black money transacted into their account for fake accounts , transactions coming from hawala accounts , relationships with ministers , people have money in their accounts from fraudulent activities linked to looting banks , financial organizations , on account of so many financial policies given on account of low waged people under slum category , why such daughters are given property , why these checks are not done , whose taking the money , and what all things those people are doing , on account of what , are they taking that money , on what basis , these fucking details are not intervened by people from law boards , why daughters , who had married one person thrown out on roads , without a divorce case , why that girl ,or lady is harrassed by law authority also in a nasty manner , why these things are not discussed in an open manner , people doing drug activities , taking monetary loan ,from banks of urban areas ,not paying it at all , do not have their own money , spending a lot for showing lavish attires to family members , then asking for property papers on account of will , this is hikes if people are speaking on account of these cases in supreme court , it is highly shameful for supreme court for dealing with these case , when so many criminal cases are pending , I literally shit on to the faces of supreme court chief justice face , and dislike his honourary interventions . This is ridiculous.

  • @priyarombade557
    @priyarombade557 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Give case law on marriage act

  • @CkvenkatesanCkVenkatesan
    @CkvenkatesanCkVenkatesan ปีที่แล้ว

    Will power detail.

  • @csnimeshanand3102
    @csnimeshanand3102 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    कुछ भी समझ नही आया

  • @jaikrishnan227
    @jaikrishnan227 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Court case y goin 25 years ? Doin business

  • @perceptionofpublic4848
    @perceptionofpublic4848 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    चार भाई की सम्पति बाटने के लिए क्या कागजात जरूरी हैं, चारों भाई मर गये, लेकिन कोई वशीयत नही बना है?

  • @pavip3099
    @pavip3099 ปีที่แล้ว

    A complaint by a 72 years old lady on stamp paper with an affidavit addressed to taluka magistrate done saying forceful signatures taken by her twin daughters on some papers during her fractured leg condition. Any papers on properties having so and so nos. should be considered as cheating is written in it. Also they have snatched away gold taken out from back locker and one of them has not given money of 1/2 ( 6) plots inspite of sale deed done...is also written in it. But the Original remained inside house and we were dragged out of house saying Will deed is on their name. It was a regd. Will. How can I revoke it? Please guide me. When it was got done late brother's name was there on property card of revenue city survey office but in municipality, her nm was there on prprty card. It was prprty of my two unmarried late brothers who had received it through partition deed betwn father and his two sons when sons were minor and one daughter elder to these sons and three daughters were born to father after the partition. Will 1 st daughter get prprty? How? How much? Guide me to revoke Will. The original above said stamp paper complaint is snatched. Certified copy of complaint to tahasildar on stamp paper with affidavit from tahasildar office is obtained. Guide me to revoke the Will. Mother was staying with me and inspite of getting done Will, twin sisters had gone to court andhadfiled suit against mother that she was unsound and surrouding public may deceive her.