I PLAYED Gray Zone Warfare, Here Are My Thoughts...
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 พ.ค. 2024
- 🔔 Subscribe for MORE ► bit.ly/karmasub
🎮 Official Karmakut Store (10% off merch with code "MILSIMP") ► karmakut.com/
🤜 Join as a Channel Member ► bit.ly/joinkarma
I PLAYED Gray Zone Warfare, Here Are My Thoughts...
00:00 The Good
02:08 The Issues
- - - - -
LINKS:
⌨️ Discord ► / discord
📸 Instagram ► / karmakut
🔴 Twitch ► / karmakut
🐤 Twitter ► / karmakut
👓 Reddit ► / karmakut
🖥️ Specs and Gear ► www.amazon.com/shop/karmakut
- - - - -
👏 Special thanks to my General Channel Members (bit.ly/joinkarma):
- - - - -
#karmakut #milsim #grayzonewarfare - เกม
![🔴 🅻🅸🆅🅴 - Thorsday [PS5]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/f2gLNAKClo4/mqdefault.jpg)
![[UNCUT] ฝันรักห้วงนิทรา | EP.1 (1/4)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/g7F6i0ganRU/mqdefault.jpg)
Gray Zone Warfare has an EXTREMELY promising foundation, but we definitely need to see/hear more about what the core of the game will be like!
Dear karmakut, please try to push the idea of shrapnel to these developers.
Would also love to see proper trenches.
Will be a huge flop
@@ROYAL_KRTL I doubt it gonna be good just need to add more chaos
way too overhyped just watch the flop lmfao @@twopiness
The graphics feel deeply immersive.
Love how after The Day Before scam, clarifying that the product is actually a real game is a legitimate item on a list of pros.
Great vid Karma!
What's that to love? I think it's sad
@@alextheautonomousman8709 That's fair. Can see the increased awareness to scam tech demos as a silver lining tho
@@alextheautonomousman8709 That's fair. Can see the increased awareness to scam tech demos as a silver lining tho
its a low bar to clear
What I appreciate sm about the foliage is the amount of smaller shrubs and taller grasses. Too many games make forests arguably worse to traverse through because the foliage either doesn’t render far enough to provide ample concealment or immersion. Plenty of games as popular as tarkov or squad have a pretty big problem with yhis
This could be part of the reason that the performance has been inconsistent with this game.
My personal opinion on the gameplay loop should be basically arma 3 antistasi mixed with helldivers, the basis of the game is 3 pmc factions fight over control over the exclusionary zone....so control of POIs would be important and those POIs should grant buffs to your supply lines and capability. Is rolling 4 deep in a toyota hi lux doing hoodrat shit too much to ask for?
Ya pvp and teamwork would be balanced very well if they did that. The game already gives off heavy arma vibes.
amen
@@isaakfaulk8067 would be cool if you get overwhelmed you can request a friendly faction QRF and the call goes out to any players on the map of the same faction which would be their mission to escort you to the LZ or keep you alive for a set period of time.
Oh my Arlit Toyota from Arma 3. Damn...
Convince the devs to add a mission EDITOR and modding tools and we are good to go!
Thats the dream for me. I edit for mt group on arma 3, and thats definitelly is the biggest dream for this game!
Why is the editor capitalized
@@woolytemple3667 because boy howdy we don't get EDITORs anymore. I always wanted to map for Titanfall and Respawn said they wanted to release tools but it never happened
I really appreciate how and short and simple this vid was.
Was gunna say the same thing. Quick explanation videos, to the point. Curious if there will be a gameplay vid
Gray Zone Warfare, main reason to play this game is TACTICAL SHOOTINGS IN JUNGLE !!! We are tired fighting in sand and yellow sand again and again in a circle of tons of time.
Arma 3 Apex anyone?
@@XmarcX92just finished my group campaign in Boreal Tanoa, month ago. That map is a blast.
Crazy how much realistic foliage makes a difference.
Your niche problems section, i feel like has already been addressed. The three factions are not dropping in together at all, each faction will have a Base near the "zone" and when you join you will select your faction. Players who "Grief" or team kill, will be heavily punished, and as they have said in previous videos, potentially be kicked out from the faction, If you are kicked from the faction you will have to do missions to regain favor with the faction that youve been removed from. This means that if you team kill enough, you may be left SOLO, and theyve talked about how this could open the doors to playing alongside the bandit factions within the game, but they have not fleshed that out at all yet. Traders are locked to factions, and as such, your equipment availability will be highly dependent on being in a faction. Making it much less likely that griefers will be actively ruining the experience.
Nice address to the Critique point 4:10 from the video 👍
its only address if its implemented, which we just haven't seen yet. its the same thing as tarkov devs saying how they want to add in PMC karma, but haven't yet. the implementation is incredibly difficult. what happens if i'm a good boy all the time, and then teamkill a single time either by accident or on purpose? how do you tell if it was accidental or not? even the SCAV karma punishment in EFT isn't enough to dissuade someone from scav killing you if they watch you pick up incredibly valuable loot
Just go back to simple Team kills within a certain time frame gets you booted.
Karma systems are overly complicated for what needs to be done here. I understand that Karma can be well done, and be super complicated. But for the fact of controlling griefers the code basically needs to say If player kills x teammates in x time, boot from pmc group.
Getting back in should not be easy, i would say minimum like a 3 mission quest line to get back in, something like an hour and a half to 4 hours gameplay to rejoin your pmc group. This way the number of people who are just griefing to grief would get reduced significantly.
Karma is complicated, but i dont think that you need karma to address griefers.
In tarkov if your a smart scav, you can still get around the karma system by baiting another player, and once they hit you, its open season.
appreciate the honest review
i heard about this game literally last week and have been super hyped for it. this was a fun vid to watch
Setting the bar for the tactical FPS genre is HUGE
I watched this in Drewski’s POV and in his video it does bring up a good point, ngl this does feel reminiscent to Arma 3 Watseland or rather Exile, where 3 factions do PvE related quests, and it’s not as PvP focus but the option is there… rn based on the footage the game looks like Ground Branch and Arma 3 Exile made a baby
i loved early sandstorm PVE
there's enough pvp focused games this one doesn't need pvp to be its primary thing to succeed
100% agree. So tired of toxic ppl around dictacting games road maps
theres also plenty of pve focused games, but those aren't played as much as the PvP ones for a reason. I have no problems with PvE, it means that the E must be incredibly believable and challenging, which is just not the case at this point in time in GZW. i am hoping they can significantly improve this, but you can look at teams like RoN who have spent plenty of time and effort in AI, but still have issues. not to mention AAA studios that spend millions of dollars in development, still have issue with AI
@@karmakut AI is the most challenging part of a game development. Arma 3 is the only game I can actually modifiy to the point you have rrally bad time against AI, nowadays. Even Tarkov has a really bad AI. Still Id rather for PvE because of the comunity.
@@karmakut I mean do you want AI to behave like humans? then whats even the point of AI? Why not have players instead of AI if AI is 1:1 like players
@@karmakut love pvp but we have to many pvp games as long as the game is good I could care less if there dumb it's funny sometimes arma 3 is the only one where you can actively make players hate how good the ai is enjoy those moments to
PVP should be secondary. There are already far too many games focused on PVP, which destroys games. No one talks about this. Too much focus goes to metas, grinding to get access to metas, and than people who no life the game for years.....shouldn't have to constantly deal with that...just my opinion
I fully agree with this
I'm playing SP Tarkov and it's a night and day difference.
I despise Tarkov and I'm enjoying it so much this way.
Not saying Tarkov should change, but we need more variety in the genre.
Killing bots gets much more repetitive than killing players.
Thats sometimes true, depending on the AI, where as dealing with metas never stops, ever, in regards to PVP@@kakmaster6945
I feel that would get boring really quick, specially if bots are barebones. I'd rather play other humans that can out think me, and I can out think them even when having lesser gear. That's the thrill of it, this isn't supposed to be casual, but the other way.
It would be kind of cool concept of this game to turn into a giant Antistasi like in arma all pvpve, civs, and a constant battle for resources
Great video! Gameplay has and always will be the most important element of any game... take the countless fails of AAA titles compared to many indie titles...there is something unique in those player interactions ala Dayz, if balanced with immersion.
Excellent breakdown!
To me, squad based PvE with the added spice of a chance of squad to squad PvP (easily managed with any shared objective missions) is FPS gaming nirvana. The game as it is right now would pretty much satisfy. Looking forward to fleshed-out AI and sounds :)
one of the few things I noticed early on is how choppy and rough the movement is. It's giving me a nasty freaking headache, but it looks promising, and I can't wait to buy it.!
Good vid man. Game has a lot of potential, and the issues you brought up are exactly what I hope the devs will pull through on. Really hoping they do because if anything the foundation they've laid seems really solid.
I think if they introduce a ware between two factions, that is constant and ever changing regardless of you being in the server or not, and than you and your faction can either side with one side or the other. Each side having its own storyline, or go rouge and only loot and shoot. It would give the player more room to explore. However problems with games like ghost recon is once you beat it. Than you’ve beat it. Games like tarkov were you can’t technically win you just grind, retain players. So maybe instead of just a loot and shoot, you introduce objectives that must be taken as well and if you are killed not only do you loose gear but you loose territory. I think that would cause a huge amount of intricate problem solving requirements and tactical gaming as well as the loot and shoot.
Zero to hero and than once your a hero you have to lead. You get killed you loose it all and have to pick up the pieces of your failure and continue to figure out the climb.
Dude, there is even foliage collision at 1:16, nice!
This stuff was present in the original Crysis back in 2007 -- plus you could completely level entire forests in that game, which was awesome. It's kind of sad how we still don't have a proper tactical FPS game that surpasses those features even to this day.
Depending on the weapon caliber, the gas from the weapon will move vegetation that can be noticed by the AI. Devs mentioned this in another vid.
I wouls love to see this take a ghost recon like direction. Doing missions, discovering secrets, having to choose between helping your company or doing the right thing. I'm not sure what the point of the 3 way pmc thing is unless they're going for a heavy pvp focus.
If the devs take your advice... this will be an amazing game. They already did the right thing by inviting you this early...
Kind knocked the hype down for me still have hope for it
Think if they add more bots an make the smarter an more accurate think this can be great game
well no shit its a very early pre alpha of course its going to be smarter thats what they are advertising
I think they focused way too much on the weapons systems and kinda forgot about everything else but now thanks to the feedback i bet they’ll try to improve in those areas as well.
I think death from friendly fire could be countered with not losing your items, idk just a thought
Or it could be a punishment for, yaknow, not working as a team.
thank you
1:39 all well and good having a network run smoothly under controlled conditions. How it’s does under reality conditions is the true test. (Not like I expect the devs to have it figured out just a point of consideration)
This whole test was under "real" conditions. They even patched the pre-alpha as they went due to AMD issues discovered.
Holster weapon would be very nice
Stalker gamma is the pve king of tactical shooters
Hell yeah
Idk why but that's the first time I heard/noticed Madfinger was the Devs😮. They deserve more prospects in the future of this game at the very least, ok now I'm interested ✅
looks like the ghost recon game we need!
In my very honest opinion, and I mean NO offense at all, Dev studios should stop listening to the opinions of "content creators".
There will be too many different interests at play when they do.
Devs should listen to the players and to ppl with real world knowledge, be it about the game's theme, be it about game development.
Content creators do NOT represent players, nor were they appointed to such.
They could help with digital marketing, but not so much with the devving. There are exceptions though. There are CC's WITH those aformentioned kinds of knowledge.
But still... the interests will be there anyway.
Stop listening to CCs.
Make your own damn mind, and take your own damn chances.
There's a reason contemporary games have been failing, right along with the rise of the CCs.
100% agree And Tarkov is one of the best examples out there.... What was supposed to be a realism based game, now is just a hardcoreish nobrain pvp game...
If you look collectively at the test videos for GZW, you can tell 90% of these content creators have no idea how to play a tactical shooter. It's almost laughable when you see some of them. All trying to push through doorways together, into alleys, running backwards and forwards into each other.
@@OllieVK exactly. Theyd die so fast on a good edited arma 3 mission with lambs creep activated throughout AIs...
I've seen the same critics for other games where the gunplay is cool, graphics are good, etc but there's no game to be played. It's just a cool demo to showcase one or two features. I hope gray zone can bring something different. Since there's seem to be a single large map with 3 factions I think it'd be cool to have some base mechanics, more like dayz and rust than tarkov. I really think tarkov would benefit from something similar with bear/usec but now the game is pretty much a solo experience.
I hope they drop this for next-gen. Console.
Nah I love the PvE aspect. As someone who's tired of having to be 100% serious about each raid in Escape from Tarkov, this would be a great balance between that game and something like Ghost Recon Wildlands (something the developer made very clear are his two favorite games & main inspiration for this one). Its suppose to be a more casual and friendly experience.
I agree, I absolutely love tarkov but it gets really tiring after a few raids because of how on your toes you need to be constantly, casual gameplay feels impossible because you're always listening for footsteps and shit lol. PvE is awesome as long as the AI are well done and with occasional player combat
from what ive seen from other people the AI is amazing...
4:35 in tarkov its line go up
Six days in Fallujah has the best most realistic bots in my opinion
Not all of us want to play PvP, play stalker gamma all the way through and you will quickly realize you don't even need PvP to have a good game.
Also, the fact you fight players is not what pumps your adrenaline, it's knowing if you die you lose everything.
Thanks for respecting my time and not making this video 20-30 minutes long like every other TH-camr covering this game right now.
Escape from Tarkov in this engine would be insane.
bot didn't seem to notice being shot in the back of the head lol
The Question is, will be there more fundamental updates in GZW?
PvP should not be a major mode in this game
PvP should be a major mode in this game.
its like ghost recon wildlands but for adults
Ghost recon Wildlands if it was made by a good development team instead of Ubisoft
Can you comment PC specs and graphics settings? Are PC specs as in Amazon am i right?
The visuals look fantastic. The gun audio is very very underwhelming. Looking forward to see how the development progresses.
Hey all, OG Gamer here. I know not much of all this "pvppe", "pvpe", or whatever "pvpvpve" talk is, but I have one question and one question only that Im hoping someone knowledgeable can answer with a simple yes or no respectively, followed by whatever explanations which may be relevant secondary:
WILL I BE ABLE TO PLAY MY SQUAD (OF REAL PEOPLE) VS OTHER REAL SQUADS ( OTHER REAL SQUAD AS DEFINED BY ANOTHER SQUAD OF REAL PEOPLE - AKA NOT AI AKA BOTS) ?
Disclaimer: Mature and straight forward answers only, plz
P.S. Im simply trying to figure out whether this is just not a real squad vs bots only kind of game
'Preesh
I’m playing a fun game today of, who of my subscriptions got to play GZW lol it’s popping up everywhere!
Imo games geared toward realism should have minimal amounts of pvp mainly because people will purposely try to break the game to win. I wish more effort was put Into AI and bot behavior in PvE games. Ready or not is the best I've seen in any game, they don't feel cheap and easy to fight against and their movement seems so fluid and not scripted at all.
Can't wait to play it on low everything lol
I hate the PvP, we need intelligent AI and co-op more often. PvP just gets hackers and modded hardware to get an advantage. There needs to be more biomes to fight in as well, not just jungle which is all I’ve seen thus far.
Dude u Drewski and Jackfrags all released the same video at the exact same time 🤣🤣
The gun youtubers do the same thing with products. That way advertising is slammed to the forefront to the audience.
car reviewers as well
Its this thing called a release embargo. They cant release footage until a certain date and time provided by the publisher/developer
BigfryTV as well
Of course you did
I appreciate this video and the time it took you to put it together! Having said that you keep referencing Tarkov as something to be aspired toward without dealing with the elephant in the room, the massive CHEATING in Tarkov! Please be clear to viewers that if the creators of Tarkov were taking care of business with regard to the MASSIVE cheating problem endemic to the game then no one would be interested in playing any of these other games!
U don’t have to join a random team u can play by urself or with ur friends
damn i really hope my potato will run this game, it looks awesome!
My only problem is the lack of performance. You literally need a nasa pc for this
Wish it had more squad and arma 3 features
I mean its UE5 + insane graphics, ofc you need a nasa pc, but you can also turn down graphics
Needs at least Crysis 1 level of physics...
you've not followed along with the development process of GZW have you? the goal of the game is to reveal what happened on the island, by doing missions and finding in-game information you get to piece together a story with deep lore that is (according to the devs) intriguing and will pull you in to find out more and more. you played 1 mission from, which is gonna be the 4th or 5th mission you can undertake in when EA releases, this means you're still being sent to the starter/easy area to get to grips with game mechanics. the AI there is the easiest of the entire game and they get smarter, more accurate, and better equiped the more inland you go. don't get me wrong it's cool to see someone disagree with 95% of the other youtubers who participated in this playtest, but to me it feels like you are uninformed and just got to play a game out of the blue without any prior knowledge about what that game aims to be. i still liked the video, since i respect your opinion and the time you spent voicing that opinion. you've also played the game and i have not. therefore i'd agree to disagree and leave it at that.
Greatly written and expressed, I completely agree with you... I've already seen several videos where they question or don't know things that were confirmed by the developers themselves and were also in the version that the person tested... Then I don't understand what to think about the whole video, because I think the creator doesn't even know what the video was about.
Nope. Still not onboard, and not sure I will be anytime soon. Thanks to GB, Six Days, and RoN, I've learned my lesson that a pretty game means absolutely nothing to me anymore. I wish them good luck I guess, but unless it releases and becomes a shock hit like Helldivers 2, I won't be wasting my money.
I played couple thousands of hours of hunt showdown since beta. I really liked how they made that game in terms of pvpve.
After all these years and crysis still looks better.
Is it me of do the rifles look a little on the thin side. Also I think the thing that you are missing is while yes PvP is going to be less in this game than say tarkov. It means that when it happens it's going to be a more impactful fight. Now that means the adrealin junkies might get more bored with GZW, but for me I can only play tarkov for small bits at a time as it really starts to wear on my nerves since I'm constantly on edge. The AI definietly needs to be improved but I don't think that it needs to be more PvP focused. Plus if they add in more survival elements or a really robust injury system and make gun fights very intense and impactful then I think it will do well. Time will tell.
I totally agree! It is a game studio that has the means and knowledge, and they clearly know what they want from the game and why they are making it.
Lovely
Ghost Recon Wildlands in first person, wow what an innovation
Subed..
to be fair , i agree. if madfinger games don't want PvP to be the core experience the PvE AI need to start being on par with a player. If i had to play Single Player Tarkov with their default braindeath AI , i would have quit months ago but the SAIN mod makes it insanely hard , unique and fun. But this , if the AI stays this dumb as shown in the video i will very much not buy it cause this would be boring within two weeks no matter how great it looks.
for the sake of a holy FAK when will these games offer a SP campaign?
They should learn form ReadyorNot
It definitely wouldn't hurt to make it a PVP experience first. I would play the shit out of Tarkov if it had squads of 4
Did the devs talk anti cheat in the game at all???
Best analysis so far. PPL think AI is an easy fix. It takes years to develop AI. This game is overhyped and in trouble. They are a mobile game developer. Good luck to them.
There's nothing hardcore about Tarkov, the game is way too easy and most people are multimillionaires a few weeks into the wipe, thicc cases full of armor, loot doesnt even matter anymore.
I'm hopin Gray Zone doesn't implement a scav system, but instead forcing us to always use our PMC's.
Tarkov lost the hardcore feel when ratting in corners and bushes became the "meta" since then it just plays boringly
AI hasn't really improved much since SWAT 3 did it?
You, bigfry, and drewski all have basically the same thumbnail for your respective videos on this game.
I can barely run tarkov don’t wanna think about my gameplay
On this game😭
its really sus when someone has to say "yes its a real game" guess we'll wait
well it is a real game the video is proof lmao are you blind
The only reason it's mentioned is because of games like the day before. You literally just watched a video of the gameplay there's nothing sus lmao
We do not care about PvP. We do not have to entertain a public, we are not streamers.
No we are sick of PVP too many hackers, PVE all the way!
This game dies if its only PvE
@@danielm2213 BS
@@danielm2213 One word Division!
@@danielm2213There is a PvP mode as well as a PvE mode, so you don't have to worry. And no, it won't die without PvP. Just look at Ghost Recon: Breakpoint.
if you tk too much you get kicked out of your faction and become a rouge
We need blood and exit wounds and limbs.
PvP need to be insane to kill arma3 / dayz
its not about killing those games
if this will real more immersive and realistic and unforgiveble than tarkov, i will leave tarkov immediatly.
I wish Tarkov looked like this.
Woah its really out now huh? Pre-Alpha graphs looks pretty beautiful!
Is it on any console yet or just pc?
PvP isn’t the goal here
PvP will be secondary. Always. This is not your another EFT game Karmakut. If you want true PvP I suggest you should look for something else.
ARMA is not going to a direction I like, so I hope this game aims to replace ARMA 3 and, potentially, 4.
This better be coming out for next-gen console otherwise it's going to be an extreme missed experience.
We are freaking tired of Call of Duty junk.
this looks more like arma than arma
"Remember this is a pre-alpha version"
Then rant for 5 minutes straight at stuff you do not care when you're playing a pre-alpha release.
Nice job.
PVP will not be 2 . the people will not allow it...
PvE games have to worry about griefers. PvP games have to worry about cheaters.
nice to see some honest thoughts on this game. the PR push seems iffy, not saying anyone's been paid but reaching out to certain content creators does skew the videos to be more positive
In my experience i saw more of a genuine opinion. Seems that they just gave away access to tactical gamer channels
i really hope the performance would be good when it releases unlike ready or not
ready or not plays fine, what are you talking about?
@@SpaceMissile not really, the performance is really terrible
@@plutoisnormal runs fine for me and my pc isn't even that beefy.
@@SpaceMissile I do feel like FPS is much better with the latest few updates but at launch some maps with certain sections (mostly glass) like valley of the doll, Lethal Obsession, the hospital etc. had (and still kinda do have) major random FPS drops due to, from my guess lighting conditions.
@@noobguy9973 touché. admittedly, i have experienced some stuttering periodically, but it's definitely still playable.
the subreddit especially makes it seem like the game is garbo though, and I just don't see it that way.
PVP being a small chance encounter is amazing. I stopped playing tarkov because of the PVP.. SPT is waaay more my thing.
Feel you bro.