A Beginner's Guide to the Fourth Dimension

แชร์
ฝัง

ความคิดเห็น • 7K

  • @elijahthompson7049
    @elijahthompson7049 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17850

    Imagine 4d creatures using 3 dimensional screens to convey theories on 5 dimensions

  • @col7937
    @col7937 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6814

    fun fact:
    If you watch all of the dimension videos on TH-cam, you become crazy and still don't get it.

    • @randomonio
      @randomonio 4 ปีที่แล้ว +351

      I did and I wanted to shoot myself from comprehending and mentally and physically visualizing the 4th dimension. Currently writing a book titled "How I Nearly Broke The Current Universe"

    • @That_One_Guy...
      @That_One_Guy... 4 ปีที่แล้ว +78

      What if you get it and you become crazy ?

    • @col7937
      @col7937 4 ปีที่แล้ว +98

      @@That_One_Guy... I guess I would want that because I didn't get it and I feel kind of dumb

    • @777holy67
      @777holy67 4 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      Oh god thank you ! i still dont get it too i feel stupid ...

    • @XnazxulX
      @XnazxulX 4 ปีที่แล้ว +76

      We can’t comprehend it, don’t even try. It makes me sick the more and more i try to get my brain to see it. I’ll just stick to 3D thanks.

  • @effyiew7318
    @effyiew7318 ปีที่แล้ว +337

    I've watched many videos trying to understand 4D and this one has gotten me the closest. Well done.

    • @codesymphony
      @codesymphony ปีที่แล้ว +15

      the shadow example made so much sense. never seen that comparison before

    • @bobbafett1971
      @bobbafett1971 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You should give credit to the creator 9f flatland.

    • @AlbertoGomez-oi5ou
      @AlbertoGomez-oi5ou 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      x2

    • @Gamefan86
      @Gamefan86 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There is no 4th dimension. It doesn't exist.

    • @vibecat7101
      @vibecat7101 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Gamefan86 but you can imagine it

  • @justjimmy765
    @justjimmy765 2 ปีที่แล้ว +415

    Just a suggestion: Turn on the Phase Reverse on your Preamp/ DAW for your microphone to eliminate the "underwater" out-of-phase sound, and turn your compressor to at least 4:1 to level out the constant change in distance from the mic. The presentation itself is good.

    • @thecianinator
      @thecianinator 2 ปีที่แล้ว +43

      Bro that's good advice but this video is 5 years old, this guy has improved dramatically

    • @shannonmccarthy7094
      @shannonmccarthy7094 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Flipping phase on a single source of audio ahieves nothing lol phase is only relative when listenin to 2 different sources simultaneously.

    • @SmokeyRoseWolf
      @SmokeyRoseWolf ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@thecianinator 😂 my first time finding this channel ever

    • @lackokalman
      @lackokalman ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Actually, this is from using a stupid noise cancellation plugin.

    • @Terra101
      @Terra101 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@lackokalman Yeah we cancel out the background hum that would bother no one to completely mess up the voice of the speaker while adding weird underwater noises.

  • @SyriusStarMultimedia
    @SyriusStarMultimedia 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5407

    I love it when the smart people talk to the rest of us like we are people.

    • @jonb6417
      @jonb6417 3 ปีที่แล้ว +49

      Maybe so, on different subjects - but this guy is not smart. He's talking trash, I'm afraid.

    • @bobstringer9809
      @bobstringer9809 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      👽 hmmmm

    • @jonb6417
      @jonb6417 3 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      @you tube Because he's making up theories - which is fine - and pretending that they relate to reality - which, unless that is proven, is not fine. In my humble opinion, anyway. I want proof, or at least very strong circumstantial evidence that can be demonstrated in repeatable and potentially-falsifiable experiment.

    • @fatemaessam3737
      @fatemaessam3737 3 ปีที่แล้ว +206

      @@jonb6417 how tf are u supposed to prove that? its obviously all h theories cos we will never ever be able to prove the existence of other dimensions (why? we can’t even see them, our minds cannot even imagine how they look like)

    • @robertbadger147
      @robertbadger147 3 ปีที่แล้ว +108

      @@jonb6417 he just explained it using the logic of math

  • @prestonh113
    @prestonh113 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4768

    You're explaining 4D to me
    In my 3D world
    On my 2D screen
    And I'm trying to understand with my 1D brain... and this comment is original in 0 dimensions.

  • @cara.leo_
    @cara.leo_ 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Not sure if I completely understand the fourth dimension yet but I feel like this video has gotten me closer to it. Thank you.

  • @yoyoschmo1
    @yoyoschmo1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    This was by far the best explanation I’ve seen. So good that I scoured the internet to find it again. Now if you can just get me to understand 11 dimensions

    • @Waerom1
      @Waerom1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I have no idea but could it be the ability to perceive the entirety of the multiverse at once

    • @frankdimeglio8216
      @frankdimeglio8216 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@Waerom1 Consider WHAT IS THE EYE ON BALANCE. (Notice the associated black “space” of WHAT IS THE EYE ON BALANCE, AS BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand.) WHAT IS E=MC2 is gravity. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE !! TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. INDEED, consider what is the fully illuminated AND setting/WHITE MOON ON BALANCE; AS it IS the SAME SIZE as what is THE EYE. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense ON BALANCE. INDEED, consider, ON BALANCE, why and how it is that there is something instead of nothing. Great. LOOK at what is the TRANSLUCENT AND BLUE sky ON BALANCE !!(THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE.) Consider what is the ORANGE AND setting Sun. Magnificent. Notice that, ON BALANCE, the curvature or shape of WHAT IS THE MOON matches that of WHAT IS THE EARTH/GROUND. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. INDEED, consider WHAT IS THE EYE ON BALANCE. NOW, consider what is THE SUN along WITH the fact that the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. A given PLANET (including WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out equal area in equal TIME. Great. WHAT IS E=MC2 IS WHAT IS GRAVITY (ON/IN BALANCE). Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE !! INDEED, consider, ON BALANCE, why and how it is that there is something instead of nothing. Great. Consider WHAT IS THE EYE ON BALANCE. c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE (ON BALANCE). Magnificent. I have CLEARLY proven and explained what is the fourth dimension. WHAT IS GRAVITY is, ON BALANCE, an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked. Great.
      By Frank Martin DiMeglio

  • @AR-xq7nh
    @AR-xq7nh 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5792

    Are we shadows of our 4d selves ?

    • @svetlinsofiev6729
      @svetlinsofiev6729 5 ปีที่แล้ว +409

      Good question

    • @greatvib3s
      @greatvib3s 5 ปีที่แล้ว +700

      If it were true, your 'shadow' would invert itself inside out every time your real body rotated... I don't think most people sleep normally until they turn over and have all of their innards pop out and wrap around them! But those are still the right types of questions to ask

    • @AngelRuiz-ec5qy
      @AngelRuiz-ec5qy 5 ปีที่แล้ว +150

      Question blew my mind

    • @jthb
      @jthb 5 ปีที่แล้ว +93

      When i thought i finnally understood it. I could almost interact with 4d in 3d imaginary
      But it just got so complicated

    • @jthb
      @jthb 5 ปีที่แล้ว +60

      Btw what dimension is light

  • @mobamba8265
    @mobamba8265 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3155

    is there a beginners guide for this beginners guide this shit too confusing for me

    • @moneyfu5989
      @moneyfu5989 5 ปีที่แล้ว +132

      It's trapped in the fourth dimension. Go ahead, rEacH iN

    • @purp.mp3
      @purp.mp3 5 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      I'll explain it

    • @purp.mp3
      @purp.mp3 5 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Shit

    • @purp.mp3
      @purp.mp3 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Shit

    • @purp.mp3
      @purp.mp3 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Shit shit shit

  • @reginaldthunderfuck4832
    @reginaldthunderfuck4832 2 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    I read a book called Hyperspace by Michio Kaku once. There was a passage where someone proposed thinking of a cube, unfolding it into a 2d series of squares, making the squares into cubes and then refolding them into a cube as a means of picturing a hypercube.
    Also, I may be misinformed but I thought spacetime was a dimension.

  • @baronvg
    @baronvg 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    I’ve watched many videos explaining 4D, some very good. This explained things I haven’t heard before.

  • @asingularcheesepuff6383
    @asingularcheesepuff6383 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2637

    Here's fuel for thought: as 3D beings, we can fully perceive anything and everything on a 2D plane (as demonstrated by the circle-in-the-box scenario), however due to the lack of the third dimention, a (theoretical) 2D person would find it impossible to look "up" and see us, as we simply exist above their dimension.
    Taking this one step further - if a 4D person was to look at a 3D plane, they too would be able to perceive everything at once - you, the house you're in, the plumbing of the house, your organs digesting your last meal... anything. And the scary part is, as we exist on a 3D plane, we would be completely unable to look "out" to see these 4D people. They could exist, and be watching you read this, right now, but you wouldn't be able to tell. ;)

    • @daysetx
      @daysetx 5 ปีที่แล้ว +104

      @@datashe yup, more random unique data is better for them

    • @ModSquads
      @ModSquads 5 ปีที่แล้ว +201

      Blessed are those who cannot see and still believe!

    • @millenniumhandandshrimp2610
      @millenniumhandandshrimp2610 5 ปีที่แล้ว +175

      That's the kind of thoughts Lovecraft pleasured himself to on lonely nights.
      Also, if you ever encounter a color you've never seen before, don't go near it.

    • @cb1671
      @cb1671 5 ปีที่แล้ว +114

      Well, you'd see something, right? You'd see a 3d cross section of them. Although we wouldn't really be able to know what the true shape is

    • @asingularcheesepuff6383
      @asingularcheesepuff6383 5 ปีที่แล้ว +83

      @@cb1671 Would you though? Go back to the example I gave about a 2D plane - how would a 2D human be able to look "up", and see us? They simply can't, as they're restricted in what they can see by the plane on which they exist. They could probably see our shadow, if we were to cast it over them, but that's about it.
      In terms of 3D observing 4D, I see no reason as to why we wouldn't be able to see the shadow of a 4D person, but we wouldn't be able to directly observe them.

  • @CyberQuickYT
    @CyberQuickYT 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1986

    to make 4d just add water, some shaking and air.
    (Cinemas would agree)

    • @brysonsirus7747
      @brysonsirus7747 4 ปีที่แล้ว +84

      Took me 2 seconds too long to get the joke lol

    • @MrDonut-ch8dr
      @MrDonut-ch8dr 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Ralsei yeah i dont get it too

    • @dminecraft999
      @dminecraft999 4 ปีที่แล้ว +128

      Ralsei, have you been to those “4D cinemas” if you haven’t, it’s basically 3D but your chair shakes and when there is like a water effect on screen, they will spray water on you

    • @evanshelton6808
      @evanshelton6808 4 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      @Augusto Cejas nah your iq is just too high to belive that the cinema fakery is acctually 4D

    • @WombatSteve
      @WombatSteve 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @Augusto Cejas Don't be so tough on yourself mate, it's alright :)

  • @NathanDraxter
    @NathanDraxter 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I really like how you rotate the tesseract to show that all squares inside are the same size, that really gives me a better understanding of its nature

  • @livsmitty
    @livsmitty ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The 3D image of the moving tesserac really helped me understand things a lot better. It's like life blooms around you. You can open 3d objects up and around and back into themselves. Think flipping a doughnut inside out and back again.

  • @______3058
    @______3058 3 ปีที่แล้ว +934

    Fourth Dimension: Spectator Mode

    • @zohaibgulawan9070
      @zohaibgulawan9070 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Fax😂😂😂

    • @charlotttej
      @charlotttej 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      But 5th dimension?

    • @MrSirSquishy
      @MrSirSquishy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@charlotttej that's where Sci Craft come in

    • @BoomBoomMushroom
      @BoomBoomMushroom 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@MrSirSquishy lmao

    • @ThawBerry
      @ThawBerry 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@charlotttej noclip

  • @destroyishere4655
    @destroyishere4655 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3292

    It's interesting because we can't see 4D objects because we live in a 3D universe, however, hypothetically speaking, we could see the 3D shadows of 4D objects if we found some.

    • @jonb6417
      @jonb6417 3 ปีที่แล้ว +181

      No we can't. because there are no 4D objects.

    • @anuragsingh9847
      @anuragsingh9847 3 ปีที่แล้ว +205

      I get you, your logic is same as how we view 3D objects in 2D (Front, Top and Side View) but the thing is we haven't really seen a 4D object.

    • @snipingmango841
      @snipingmango841 3 ปีที่แล้ว +101

      @@anuragsingh9847 we can see what the shadow of the of a 4d object in a 3d universe

    • @elnurgadirli1013
      @elnurgadirli1013 3 ปีที่แล้ว +56

      @@jonb6417 maybe there are andour eyes cant

    • @jonb6417
      @jonb6417 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      @@elnurgadirli1013 I agree that is a possibility; you make a good point!

  • @angeldude101
    @angeldude101 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    I liked seeing the 2D shadow of a rotating cube behaving exactly the same way as the 2D shadow of the 3D shadow of the rotating tesseract. It really isn't as strange as it's usually claimed to be.

  • @Shaolinjake08
    @Shaolinjake08 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just discovering this video now, but it definitely helped me understand 4 dimensional space better. The revolving/rotating tesseract was most helpful! Thank you!

  • @perison4611
    @perison4611 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1436

    "You can see all sides of the box and the sphere inside. Now doesn't that freak you out?"
    Glass boxes: *am I a joke to you*

    • @TheWeen344
      @TheWeen344 4 ปีที่แล้ว +72

      Anything Transparent: am I a joke to you?

    • @Loo_Kah
      @Loo_Kah 4 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      @@TheWeen344 so transparent thimgs are 4D?

    • @Noobnormality
      @Noobnormality 3 ปีที่แล้ว +80

      @@Loo_Kah no. The 4th dimensional cube that we all call "tesseract" is the equivalent of a glass box in our dimension. It is made for us to understand how cubes work on 4 dimensions. The real terrasact is a "closed" object in our perspective, we will still be able to see all it's sides but we will need to walk around the box to see it. However, as for 4d beings, they will be able to see it's "shadow" as a 3d object, but will still be able to see all it's sides even if they looked at it in one perspective. Basically, it's similar on how "glass" cubes are made for nursery students to understand how a box works, and how the shadow of a box works, we will be able to see all sides of it as a line at an upper perspective, but 2d beings will need to walk around to see all of it's sides. I hope your mind doesn't shut off simultaneously after reading this...

    • @JuneJulia
      @JuneJulia 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      The idea of 4th dimension beings can see inside the box is not correct.
      If there's actually a fourth dimension then there could be another part of the box that we didn't know which could block the view to see the sphere.

    • @solarbanana652
      @solarbanana652 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@Noobnormality thx now i can finish my science project

  • @lordfinn2632
    @lordfinn2632 5 ปีที่แล้ว +770

    Now watch what happens when it starts spinning
    Me:it's not already spinning

  • @adamb7088
    @adamb7088 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is soooooo exciting. Especially when on considers using quaternions for rotations in higher dimensional spaces.

  • @tumbador662
    @tumbador662 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I couldn't wrap my head around regarding this matter until now. Thank you! You've gained another subscriber.

  • @monsieur.Chipmunk
    @monsieur.Chipmunk 4 ปีที่แล้ว +501

    Imagine the horror Mario felt, being controlled by someone to smash objects with his heads, and can only see lines along his way, the horror is giving me anxiety.

    • @criscoil5679
      @criscoil5679 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@ItsMeMissV369 holy shit stfu

    • @mateuszszulecki5206
      @mateuszszulecki5206 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      If 3D beings see in 2D
      2D being in 1D
      And 1D being in 0D
      Then are 0D beings blind?
      Edit: btw mario hits blocks *with his fists.*

    • @Xnoob545
      @Xnoob545 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      100th like

    • @trickzclipz5910
      @trickzclipz5910 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@ItsMeMissV369 the stars and planets don't affect your life in any way. Astrology is stupid and pointless.

    • @lullabypoppera3914
      @lullabypoppera3914 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@trickzclipz5910 you aren't wrong

  • @mlowe787
    @mlowe787 3 ปีที่แล้ว +820

    "I know what some people are thinking, couldn't you consider time a dimension?"
    No, my dumb ass was not thinking that at all.

    • @rioksek8930
      @rioksek8930 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      4D is time doesn't rly make sense every demension has time in it, being able to go in the past when you existed let's say exactly 10seconds and then you go in the future also exactly 10seconds does not make sense if you think about it like there should be a difference even so close to zero that could be considered negligible so well you didn't exist in that time. When we take 4d as time you existing in the past present and future doesn't really make sense since 4D is just 3D with more perpendicular lines or more planes that makes the 4D somewhat special so just so you know time is not 4D

    • @rioksek8930
      @rioksek8930 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Infamous Comment Stealer add *Me Incredible meme here*
      Dimension is dimension

    • @masonwade9924
      @masonwade9924 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rioksek8930 The way I see it, just because an object can only move on a 2D plane, does that magically mean the third dimension doesn’t exist for it? Of course not, just because you can’t observe something from one perspective doesn’t nullify it’s existence. And your example relies heavily on time TRAVEL, instead of what time is supposed to be: a measurement system. Just like length, width, and distance. Sound familiar? Let’s try something, say we have a ball and a box. You take the ball and put it in the box. Where’s the ball? In the box, of course. You watched it go in there, you remember it. You can envision it in there. Hell, here’s an extremely convenient visual for what you’re probably thinking of: 3:35 . This is a little something called object permanence, the one thing we use to identify intelligence in organisms, and surprisingly ignore it everywhere else.
      Honestly, I’m just tired of seeing these geometry buffs insisting that anything “4D” has to still be something you can see, taste, and put your dick in. These are just 3D constructs that can be inverted on themselves, get your head out of the tessaract.

    • @theplacebeyondthelies2429
      @theplacebeyondthelies2429 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      time Is 2d. space is 3d. a single atom is 1d. 4d might be spiritual realm but not spacial because space is already at 3d. Deal with it.

    • @Delta9Church
      @Delta9Church 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@theplacebeyondthelies2429 but what if time isn't a dimension. What if an atom is a 3dimensional representation of a higher dimensional object. As explained by Da Shi, a cigarette filter is a small thing, but if you were to unroll it and spread it out as a 2d object, it would fill a whole room. As dimensionality rises, physical presence would diminish. Earth, unfolded entirely into a 2d plane would be infinitely larger, but as the speed of light is a constant, on this hypothetical 2d plane, light would take longer to cross the same distance, so time would also move relatively slower due to absolute constraints.

  • @Brahvim
    @Brahvim 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you! As a 12 year old I never understood much of this, and now as a 15 year old, I did through this video. Thank you, thank you.

  • @Shift18
    @Shift18 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    4:30 this part is one of the most useful visualizations I've ever seen. I don't know why they aren't showing the 4D shadows rotating like this in every video about the 4th dimension!

  • @shinazbakar
    @shinazbakar 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1808

    I appreciate the way you explain it but the audio is giving me a migraine.

    • @BURRDAWG_
      @BURRDAWG_ 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      True

    • @seth4298
      @seth4298 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Same

    • @riturajnavindgikar1529
      @riturajnavindgikar1529 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      true bro..
      !

    • @MrSnakexxxx
      @MrSnakexxxx 4 ปีที่แล้ว +68

      Audio is from the 4th dimension. He is on a whole another level of existence...

    • @andrewdavies1312
      @andrewdavies1312 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Me too. Sounds like a bad Skype call

  • @pikakirbyyy
    @pikakirbyyy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +512

    "Here's where things get tricky."
    me who didnt understand most of the stuff he talked about beforehand: *_IT WAS ALREADY TRICKY_*

    • @reneejohnson6944
      @reneejohnson6944 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I really do want to understand this stuff but its driving me crazy 1d,2d,3d,4d,and 5d how far do these Dimensions go is there a 1d

    • @pikakirbyyy
      @pikakirbyyy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@reneejohnson6944 yes, there is a 1d, its called a line
      and yeah, this is driving me crazy too 😵

    • @OddZodd
      @OddZodd 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Imagine being on a plane (graph paper, or even just plain old line paper), and you are a line on the 2-D surface X,Y. The paper represents where (You) are and what (You) can percive. If, let's say we have a circle on the paper as well, it would look like a line, save for when it moves either farther, or closer, on the two planes of existence. If we took a shpere, a 3-D object and tried to move it on said 2-d plane, it would be confined to the rules of said dimensional plane. Since the Shere would be able to move in three different dimensions, X,Y,Z The object would appear to be 2-D to you.
      As the object moves side to side on the x and y scales, it would look normal. Things get weird when you start moving on an axis that doesn't exist. The shpere, while moving on the Z axis passing through the 2-D plane would appear to shrink until it looks like nothing is there, before suddenly popping back up and growing in size.
      This is a really compact version of things I've been thinking about and am not really sure if its correct.

    • @theplacebeyondthelies2429
      @theplacebeyondthelies2429 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      don't worry, it's bs anyway, so you didn't miss out on anything

  • @darkwave957
    @darkwave957 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    THIS IS THE ONE. THIS IS IT. after watching 5 other videos (not kidding) at my work desk trying to understand what the fuck a “4D” is, I came across this last video. And now I finally understand. I finally understand how 4D would or should work and why we can’t comprehend or access this “space”. This was a perfect video. Truly educational thank you for dumbing it down for us whom don’t understand

  • @hrishishirke5461
    @hrishishirke5461 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What a splendid and spot on explanation! Your every was matching with my present state of mind

  • @wither5673
    @wither5673 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1890

    i always imagined 4d as being able to perceive things from all directions at once in and out, if that makes sense.

    • @someone-en1gg
      @someone-en1gg 3 ปีที่แล้ว +44

      No in and out exits in 3D. If you take their components out it would only be in X Y and Z axis there is no extra axis.

    • @LEVEL_TUBER
      @LEVEL_TUBER 3 ปีที่แล้ว +63

      @@someone-en1gg he said abt 4d not 3d

    • @DickShlongJohnson
      @DickShlongJohnson 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @Wither take a look at Carl Sagan explaining the 4th dimension. It’s perfect.

    • @deathchilde
      @deathchilde 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      View of a fly?

    • @wedontwantwar71
      @wedontwantwar71 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Looked like a rotating taurus field.

  • @ssophiax9076
    @ssophiax9076 5 ปีที่แล้ว +401

    I've been watching a lot of these videos where ppl explain the 4th dimension and in every single one the top comment always is "You're explaining a 4D in 2D to my 1D brain" lmao everyone thinking they original

    • @princeofallnegros4035
      @princeofallnegros4035 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Im the original creator of that phrase. You may now give me praise.

    • @K.B.Williams
      @K.B.Williams 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@princeofallnegros4035 TK Kirkland?

    • @kinsas
      @kinsas 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      not everyone. its the same person typing same text in a different dimensions lol

    • @dunkdunkin669
      @dunkdunkin669 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Ssophiax Well they did say they have a 1d brain

    • @aryyancarman705
      @aryyancarman705 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dunkdunkin669 lol

  • @Drew_Hurst
    @Drew_Hurst 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    First time seeing @The Science Elf channel and I'm impressed because I feel adding time
    as the 4th dimension is a ruse to halt imagination of higher dimensions.
    I have seen examples of these kinds of roadblocks in chemistry, electronics, physics, medicine, and more.
    I love Your explanation of why; mine simply is that, time also exists in 2D space, as well, and in 4th, and no doubt, in 5th, 6th, etc.
    Great work Friend! Subbed
    👍👍

  • @bluebini279
    @bluebini279 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This has been the best video to explain 4 dimensions thank you my dude

  • @Unit-mh2sx
    @Unit-mh2sx 5 ปีที่แล้ว +800

    The 4 dimensions:
    D1: Length
    D2: Width
    D3: Depth
    D4: ERROR 307:
    PHYSICS NOT FOUND.....

    • @snoopdogg9490
      @snoopdogg9490 5 ปีที่แล้ว +51

      Actually dimensions are
      1:length
      2:width
      3:how high is the object
      4:in and out of it self

    • @Kuma_zou
      @Kuma_zou 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      No

    • @Kuma_zou
      @Kuma_zou 5 ปีที่แล้ว +57

      The 4 dimensions:
      D1:length
      D2:width
      D3:height
      D4:trength

    • @snoopdogg9490
      @snoopdogg9490 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@Kuma_zou what is the trenth

    • @Kuma_zou
      @Kuma_zou 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      x I.R.G_HERO x look it up in Google

  • @siddheshgawali7764
    @siddheshgawali7764 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3871

    U are explaining 4D in this virtual 3D world on a 2D sceen and im trying to understand through my 1D brain... 😂😂😂

    • @waterrail_
      @waterrail_ 6 ปีที่แล้ว +123

      Which you see thanks to your 1D brain.

    • @rwbmal
      @rwbmal 6 ปีที่แล้ว +86

      Sciencephile the A.I.

    • @waterrail_
      @waterrail_ 6 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      Oh so somebody actually knows him here

    • @rwbmal
      @rwbmal 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Maksymilian Król hey

    • @waterrail_
      @waterrail_ 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      HELLO

  • @8platypus
    @8platypus ปีที่แล้ว +1

    so 4D is being able to see the front and back of something, like a medical scan. that kinda makes sense cause you don't see them at the same time but time isn't a spacial dimension. when you see a shape you are always seeing a max of three sides (ex. top, left, right, in isometric), but a cube has 6 sides so you need to see the other three sides to see the full shape ( += bottom, back-left, back-right). So having a fly-through/walk-around image scan is another dimension than a regular "3d" jpeg image.

  • @cristianestrada708
    @cristianestrada708 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your video is one of easiest to understand regarding 4d. Thanks for making it.

  • @RoninYeti
    @RoninYeti 2 ปีที่แล้ว +754

    Here's a fun thought: what if "shadow people" are just the 3D shadow of a 4D being chilling out around you???

    • @abbiepancakeeater52
      @abbiepancakeeater52 2 ปีที่แล้ว +81

      Okay but i feel like stuff like ghost orbs is fourth dimensional (or higher) beings passing through this dimension so we only see what we can perceive.

    • @blackmoth2595
      @blackmoth2595 2 ปีที่แล้ว +81

      i agree, i sometime think that ghosts are 4 dimension beings where we can't see it clearly but can sense them in our 3d senses only... and when we see them, the image is scary because the distortions and errors in our 3d senses ...

    • @bigpapa21tx1
      @bigpapa21tx1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      Interesting but wouldn’t the 4d being have mass? You can’t clearly see them but you would know something is there because you hit them but wouldn’t be able to determine what it was. Similar to the ball and box in the 2d plane. You see a line but couldn’t see that it is a box with a ball inside but you know it is something because you hit the box. Maybe you could determine there is something in the box because of experiments like banging on the box and hear that it is hollow.

    • @RoninYeti
      @RoninYeti 2 ปีที่แล้ว +40

      @@bigpapa21tx1 I'm wondering if a 3D being could even physically interact with a 4D entity.

    • @camrynf8926
      @camrynf8926 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@abbiepancakeeater52 that is exactly what goes on in my mind every day

  • @xw591
    @xw591 4 ปีที่แล้ว +392

    "Let's just dip our toe in"
    Shows picture of cursed bathtub

    • @vvioIet
      @vvioIet 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      How is it cursed

    • @llotb9628
      @llotb9628 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@vvioIet how's it not

    • @ederbanks
      @ederbanks 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      How is it cursed?

    • @chatois9378
      @chatois9378 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Most psychopaths will kill in them

    • @fitlexyt2600
      @fitlexyt2600 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Time stamp

  • @percycho
    @percycho 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Definitely one of my favorite explanations of the fourth dimension!

  • @andyhughes8315
    @andyhughes8315 ปีที่แล้ว

    I watched a similar like 10 video years ago. I'm just now starting a undergrad math degree. Cool stuff.
    In mathematics, something in dim 4 depends on how the coordinate system vectors and variables are defined. A function of 2 vars is a 3D surface essentially where z = f(x,y). One application is apparent temp as a function of windspeed vs actual temperature. Then in machine learning its even more flexible, where any coordinate vectors / variables can be defined as anything. Different ML algorithms will optimize the higher dimension equations.
    However, in basic Physics, vectors are restricted to the 3 spatial dimensions, time, or noncontact field forces. And every law of conservation is essentially both a scalar potential function and composition of functions. So there can be different force fields embedded in 3D space. And a higher dimension function can model the system.

  • @adamv242
    @adamv242 2 ปีที่แล้ว +332

    This is the closest I've come to getting my head around a tesseract. Thank you.

    • @marcuspi999
      @marcuspi999 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Me too. I've seen a hundred videos about them, but never the shadow analogy. That was great.

    • @JupiterBoy100
      @JupiterBoy100 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wdym "closest you've come?" A tesseract is probably the easiest 4d object to understand.

  • @Matt-fm1wo
    @Matt-fm1wo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +827

    This was actually a really good visualisation of the 4D shape through shadows...the weird animations they throw at us for tesseracts without any real explanation never made sense until I watched this, so thanks! Another one I really liked was an interactive experience someone made of 4D objects slicing (the best way to describe it I think) 'into' 3D space, much like how a 3d object would look to a 2D space person if it went through their space.
    You were talking about time and space, do you know if people have looked at time as it's own dimensions? A point in time (1D), linear time (2D) and probability (3D)? If so, know any good links?

    • @PunamKumari-rc7md
      @PunamKumari-rc7md 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      You got it slightly wrong... A point in time is 0D just like it is in space you can't move. linear time is 1D since you can move forward. Probability is 2D so there are multiple simple timelines parallel stacked one over the other. The question is... what is the Third dimension in time?
      Theory about the 2nd dimension of time : The laws of physics in the world remains same. It is the natural selection factors that differs. Let's say in a world you toss a coin. No matter how many timelines you see the outcome will be the same if the surrounding conditions are. Now let's say there is another Earth where dinosaurs aren't dead. Why? Because of the law of natural selection. There is always a tiny randomisation in every world. For example, you can have a new element in some other world. Now let's say the meteor that was supposed to hit Earth was made up of a certain element but it doesn't exist in another universe, how will there be a meteor then? Or what if the meteor was made up of some other element and it never came to Earth due to that. Therefore, we can conclude that probability can only be altered by factors such as chemical reactions and the randomness of consciousness....

    • @chickenboss9952
      @chickenboss9952 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I figured 4D dimensional vision is very similar too having the vision of an MRI machine.

    • @nudlee1219
      @nudlee1219 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@PunamKumari-rc7md If i imagine 2d time as a sheet of paper, and i can move freely up and down, forward and (possibly) back, that means if i move up and down its like a multiverse thing? It would be pretty awesome..

    • @robertoherkules8109
      @robertoherkules8109 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      here is the example how can your own mind be your biggest enemy

    • @alexolle9088
      @alexolle9088 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@PunamKumari-rc7md it’s almost 1 am, the night before my exam and due to not having able to sleep, I have in the rap understanding the fourth dimension and dimension of time. Also i’m thinking that the 3D dimension of time could be the different probabilities that can make 1 y 2 happen

  • @GachaWolf81900
    @GachaWolf81900 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    What if 4th dimension isn’t a spatial dimension but a literal mirror dimension of our world where things are similar but different, that means stranger things is 4d and stuff, but it would make sense as a 4th spatial dimension couldn’t fit in with the other three and it’s not time because we live in a 3D world with xyz coords but we also have time so obviously that can’t be it so maybe it’s a literal dimension that’s mirrored or something of our world?

  • @meljusttalent1
    @meljusttalent1 ปีที่แล้ว

    This might be the best explanation I've seen. Brilliant.

  • @smora6054
    @smora6054 3 ปีที่แล้ว +95

    Dude: "Explains 4d" like he has experience it and knows it A to Z
    Same dude towards the end: This does things that we can't even imagine.

    • @seanleith5312
      @seanleith5312 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      No matter how hard he tries, it is just not so convincing. There is something wrong in that 4D logic.

    • @carlos-ej3sv
      @carlos-ej3sv 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@seanleith5312 not really. We just can't understand it. If we pick something up from a 2d world, a 2d being would witness it disappear right in front of them since they can't see up or down. You can't explain how it happened to a 2d being. If a 4d being was to move an object to the extra dimension that they have access to, we would witness it disappear. For us it's impossible, but for them its not.

    • @ThaAwesome10
      @ThaAwesome10 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@seanleith5312 it’s just that us 3D humans are not in 4d.

    • @theplacebeyondthelies2429
      @theplacebeyondthelies2429 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@seanleith5312 because 4d is not spacial, when 3d is already space. 2d is time, and 1d is a single atom. 4d must be something else, I'd say spiritual, in other words: GOD.

    • @ImaPizzaK
      @ImaPizzaK 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@theplacebeyondthelies2429 omg

  • @deusexaethera
    @deusexaethera 6 ปีที่แล้ว +500

    For anyone wondering, the difference between a true 4D Klein bottle vs. the 3D facsimile is: The 4D version doesn't need to pass through itself in order to connect its inside surface to its outside surface.

    • @moofymoo
      @moofymoo 6 ปีที่แล้ว +49

      but does it hold more beer than regular 3D bottle?

    • @deusexaethera
      @deusexaethera 6 ปีที่แล้ว +78

      If you're talking about normal 3D beer, then it would hold an infinite amount.

    • @iamprodigyable
      @iamprodigyable 6 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      This is so hard to wrap my mind around.

    • @redbeardnc6684
      @redbeardnc6684 6 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      That's the best explanation I've seen of this. Thanks!

    • @deusexaethera
      @deusexaethera 6 ปีที่แล้ว +65

      I agree, it's hard to wrap my mind around too. We don't have the mental capacity to directly visualize 4D objects, because our capacity for visualization is learned from what we can see in the outside world. (hence why people born blind have non-visual dreams.) But the concept is similar to this: A figure-8 is the 2D facsimile of a Moebius strip, but a real 3D Moebius strip doesn't need to pass through itself to connect its two ends together like a figure-8 does, because a real 3D Moebius strip has that extra degree of freedom provided by the Z axis. Similarly a real 4D Klein bottle has an extra degree of freedom provided by the W axis, allowing the little connecting tube to wrap around its main body instead of having to pass through it.

  • @user-xw9ro6ge1m
    @user-xw9ro6ge1m 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I’m fascinated with the 4D concept. Unfortunately we 3d creatures will never be able to grasp how a tesseract actually looks and make sense of it visually.

    • @OkSear
      @OkSear ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I think it would look scary

    • @RideAcrossTheRiver
      @RideAcrossTheRiver 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Now you know how flat Earthers feel.

    • @Sniped137
      @Sniped137 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@RideAcrossTheRiverflat earthers could just fly up into space or view a picture of the earth online

    • @RideAcrossTheRiver
      @RideAcrossTheRiver 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Sniped137 They don't understand what they are seeing.

    • @Sniped137
      @Sniped137 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@RideAcrossTheRiver You can look at a tennis ball right now or hell even the moon with a telescope to understand what a Sphere looks like. Your point doesn't really make sense mate

  • @Esquizit
    @Esquizit ปีที่แล้ว

    This is 6 years ago and I just figured this out on my own without even seeing this video. I also tried solving time travel, but it seems no one has got to that yet, so I will have to await my predictions. 4D is basically like a void. you cant hide anything, nor collide with anything. you did a good job on explaining it.

  • @arranhc
    @arranhc 5 ปีที่แล้ว +499

    Who else is still trying to imagine the 4th dimension?

    • @SakisTotsikas
      @SakisTotsikas 5 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      This is quantum rocket surgery sir. Five nobel prizes for you if you make it happen.

    • @caio-jl6qw
      @caio-jl6qw 5 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      gave it up already

    • @Deathnotefan97
      @Deathnotefan97 5 ปีที่แล้ว +51

      I got close once, I attempted to visualize wormholes connecting 2 points in 3D space
      I started with the 2D projection of a gravity well and slowly expanded that out in to 3 dimensions (this is already hard enough, as an accurate 3D portrayal of gravity wells requires an inside out sphere) then I spent half an hour trying to move that into some form of 4D approximation
      I reached a point where I swear I almost had it, only to suffer a sudden headache (which went away just as suddenly) and lose it
      That was a few years ago, I have not been able to reach that point since

    • @roberttail1676
      @roberttail1676 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      God, yes.. 🧠

    • @bleach4052
      @bleach4052 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I can do that

  • @izaixspace
    @izaixspace 4 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    BOY, since when do I have this much interest in the fourth dimention!?

  • @mercatero13
    @mercatero13 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very simple and thorough explanation. Good educating

  • @NKWTI
    @NKWTI 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fantastic video, best I've seen on the topic.

  • @endinguniverse0175
    @endinguniverse0175 5 ปีที่แล้ว +191

    Wow this video has the best explanation of the 4th dimension I’ve ever seen so far!

    • @Joezxc872
      @Joezxc872 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I agree, I'm glad he put some stuff into simple terms for my simpleton mind to understand. Great idea of using commonalities from a lower dimension to help visualize a higher dimension.

    • @pyrotechnick420
      @pyrotechnick420 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      He literally copied the Carl Sagan explanation. Wtf?

    • @bigwig2659
      @bigwig2659 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@pyrotechnick420 its way better. He used simple visual examples to explain it.

    • @pyrotechnick420
      @pyrotechnick420 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@bigwig2659 CARL SAGAN USED THE SAME VISUALS THATS WHAT HE COPIED. I mean ffs go watch the Carl Sagan 4d explanation and come back and tell me I'm wrong. This guy is a rip off artist

    • @doclee8755
      @doclee8755 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      pyrotechnick Agreed! And not only that, Carl Sagan based his explanation on the book by Edwin Abbot called, “Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions” and gives Abbot the properly deserved credit, because Sagan was a gentleman and a scholar and respected the scientific community.

  • @n.ribeiro569
    @n.ribeiro569 5 ปีที่แล้ว +287

    on magic mushrooms i witnessed more than the 4th dimension.

    • @asuichan8436
      @asuichan8436 4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Nikole Ribeiro nigga you a 3rd dimensional object. It’s blastphemy to say you can comprehend what we will never comprehend in this 3D world.

    • @Skelterbane69
      @Skelterbane69 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      One day, I'll build up the courage to watch a Tool music video. while I'm on shrooms

    • @shawshamsudinhairi6098
      @shawshamsudinhairi6098 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Damm high for sure

    • @jeelpatel231
      @jeelpatel231 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@asuichan8436 r/wooshed

    • @hesham2964
      @hesham2964 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Dmt

  • @tzero66
    @tzero66 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Me nodding along: "Ah yes, I understand"
    Inside my brain: "I have no clue..."

  • @leocorbino2922
    @leocorbino2922 24 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    i like the concept that we are shadows of a 4 dimension , like ancient greek filosophers thought

  • @dennyel2849
    @dennyel2849 4 ปีที่แล้ว +361

    When you die, you go to the 4D plane. There, you will be able to perceive everything in the 3D plane still, just as we can perceive anything in the 2D plane.
    However, just as anything in the 2D plane would not be able to perceive anything in the 3D plane (us), we are unable to perceive anything in the 4D plane. When you die, you become less of an astral being and more of a light source able to see everything.
    To take it one step further, maybe we're all already dead while our relatives from the 2D plane continue to mourn us...
    idek what im saying

    • @vbgvbg1133
      @vbgvbg1133 4 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      Holy shit this makes sense in a way.

    • @sarah12232
      @sarah12232 4 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Makes sense but you have no physical power in 3D plane after death

    • @samuelveytia8049
      @samuelveytia8049 4 ปีที่แล้ว +103

      You may have just created a religion

    • @siyacer
      @siyacer 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      What if you die when you're in the 4D plane

    • @sarah12232
      @sarah12232 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@siyacer well you go to heaven

  • @reallynow5357
    @reallynow5357 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1405

    After about a hundred videos on 4D *I STILL DON'T GET IT!!!*

    • @paolotondo2463
      @paolotondo2463 6 ปีที่แล้ว +79

      Really Now it s impossible..for humans think in 4d is not pissible we are in a 3 d world

    • @reallynow5357
      @reallynow5357 6 ปีที่แล้ว +203

      then how are these people able to explain these things, did they just pull these out of their ass?

    • @neoncity1557
      @neoncity1557 6 ปีที่แล้ว +192

      Maths explain them, we on the other hand visualize things with respect to other things we have seen before, there is nothing for reference when visualizing 4th dimension hence we fail to understand it visually.

    • @tyb.c.4332
      @tyb.c.4332 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      same

    • @funky555
      @funky555 6 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      just imagine a texture malfunction in a game that you can see through and not throug hat the same time

  • @Totallynotcharlestheabsurd
    @Totallynotcharlestheabsurd 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    this raised more questions than it solved and now i am interested good job

  • @dandelatorre1870
    @dandelatorre1870 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This will take my mind a while to digest what I just saw. Thank you for this.

  • @KrantiSalvi
    @KrantiSalvi 6 ปีที่แล้ว +47

    A 4D tesseract is basically a net made from cubes, like a 3D cube is made from a net of 2D squares.

    • @theout90
      @theout90 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Simply clever way of SEEING it. Thanks!

    • @timhallas4275
      @timhallas4275 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Kranti S : Interestingly enough, we can only visualize the 4d version of the 3d cube in 2d. Strange, isn't it?

    • @Son-Of-Gillean
      @Son-Of-Gillean 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Cubeception

    • @doclee8755
      @doclee8755 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      No. It’s not like that at all.

  • @ICEMAN-fp9zn
    @ICEMAN-fp9zn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    I imagine 4 or more dimensions as connecting two parts of the room that do not normally connect in 3 dimensions but can also connect in 3 dimensions. It is also like having an invisable space directly next to you that you can't see but you know is there. Almost like seeing something out of the corner of your eye but when you look at it it is gone. Also I imagine 4 or more dimensions almost like a room of mirrors where the reflected images actually connect even though an image reflected through two mirrors does not touch the image still appears in the second mirror. Now imagine that a 4th dimensional object can pass through what would seem like a solid object in 3 dimensions and be viewed as a 3 dimensional object. What would happen if you touched a 4 dimensional object passing through a 3d plane? Well I imagine it would feel like "pins and needles" since this object does not actually exist in 3 dimensions. However it would be very interesting to note how 4th dimensional objects can interact with 3 dimensional objects in unseen ways like from the invisible space that I mentioned earlier. For example if you knock an object off the table it falls to the floor. In this example if you were to knock an object through 4 dimensions it would disappear, bump your arm from an unseen direction and then land in the corner of the room. Hypothetically speaking of course 😅😅😅

  • @nerdbros1015
    @nerdbros1015 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good job you did such a good job explaining it all just makes sense to me

  • @penguinista
    @penguinista 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very helpful. Thank you!

  • @yoshi_ninja0533
    @yoshi_ninja0533 6 ปีที่แล้ว +86

    You think this is confusing. Try watching a video called "imagining the 10th dimension."

    • @ethancollins704
      @ethancollins704 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's not spatial that's talking about time

    • @monkeyrobotsinc.9875
      @monkeyrobotsinc.9875 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      those videos are ghey

    • @cleiven3533
      @cleiven3533 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @DJ FX Even in 0-dimensional space, there remains to be a point! It is not pointless, especially in higher dimensions!
      Please correctly perceive my comment as a joke.

    • @stonefaceBRC
      @stonefaceBRC 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      One step at a time buddy!

    • @zeeshanmehmood4522
      @zeeshanmehmood4522 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Let me work my way up, man

  • @cha2007
    @cha2007 5 ปีที่แล้ว +632

    did you just assume my dimension?

    • @laykantheealien5722
      @laykantheealien5722 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I'm dead 💀⚰️🥀

    • @deedotjonezee6114
      @deedotjonezee6114 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Nooo! I'd give you a 2! But 1 is as high as you got!
      .
      .
      #sarcasmtoo

    • @zym3148
      @zym3148 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      cathal m 有点意思

    • @LowProfile0247
      @LowProfile0247 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      One joke.

    • @dgtrap1
      @dgtrap1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yooooooooo....... you've destroy everyone with this comment... 😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😭😭😭😭🧨💥

  • @whisperingsquid5630
    @whisperingsquid5630 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like good content. This packaged it so many visual learners can understand physic’s better.

  • @DJSI3434
    @DJSI3434 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    this is the best video introducing someone to the topic.

  • @vanslededesign3386
    @vanslededesign3386 3 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    Man I used to watch 4D dimension videos on youtube since my 15 years old, im 22 years old now still watching 4D dimension videos and i still don't get it.. lmfao

  • @EobardFerguson
    @EobardFerguson 6 ปีที่แล้ว +512

    So... we could be the shadow of a 4-dimensional universe?

    • @fredriddles1763
      @fredriddles1763 6 ปีที่แล้ว +118

      Eobard Ferguson Thats...pretty deep when you think about it.

    • @pronounjow
      @pronounjow 6 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Or we could be holograms.

    • @BRAWGWill
      @BRAWGWill 6 ปีที่แล้ว +68

      No. Shadows are not made of matter.

    • @EobardFerguson
      @EobardFerguson 6 ปีที่แล้ว +47

      It's a metaphor, Any Old Biscuit.

    • @carver7954
      @carver7954 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Why can't I travel thru time? Or why hasn't the person I'm shadowing for travelled through the fourth spatial dimension

  • @aaronfledge
    @aaronfledge ปีที่แล้ว

    This is the first time I've got a small glimmer of understanding about how mathematicians can theorise about how many dimensions there are and what their properties are using just maths.

  • @aaronmichaud1
    @aaronmichaud1 25 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    The Carl Sagan approach… imagine the 4th dimension as though it were the 3rd dimension if all you knew was in the 2nd dimension…

  • @Mr6Sinner
    @Mr6Sinner 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2186

    Did you record this in the bottom of a full bathtub?

    • @truexenith8596
      @truexenith8596 6 ปีที่แล้ว +95

      +Uriah Siner
      How about you focus on the content of the video, you moron.

    • @Mr6Sinner
      @Mr6Sinner 6 ปีที่แล้ว +260

      Its difficult to focus when it sounds like the info is being delivered via a spongebob-esk bubble system.

    • @ApeToot
      @ApeToot 6 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      BRA YOU MADE MY NIGHT

    • @JP-wf3rd
      @JP-wf3rd 6 ปีที่แล้ว +57

      Uriah Siner- I was thinking the same thing. Hard to focus on the info when it sounds like it was recorded in the 1930s

    • @KinneKitsune
      @KinneKitsune 6 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      Hard to focus on something when an absurdly annoying voice makes you close the video

  • @mybad4101
    @mybad4101 6 ปีที่แล้ว +167

    Is your voice trapped in the fourth Dimension?

    • @roberttail1676
      @roberttail1676 5 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      It's trapped in a 1992 floppy disk.

  • @ariana1499
    @ariana1499 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i watched some other video on a 4d explanation and realized how amazing it is. Our dimension can see all the other dimensions before us and inspect them. If you move to the next dimension, they would be able to view us like an object as well and inspect us. As the dimensions multiply, you cant even imagine how complex it would be.

    • @panpunkt5185
      @panpunkt5185 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Stupidity from beginning to end.
      In the absence of one of the three dimensions you can't look at anything. That's the thing about existing objects requiring three dimensions. How can an eye with a thickness of zero look at a line with a thickness of zero? A line with ZERO thickness does not exist. So does the eye.
      Are you guys on psychotropic drugs?
      If you want to dig yourself out of the muck of Flatland's absurdity then do one thing - eat ZERO slices of, for example, a banana.
      Enjoy!

  • @belindabrown8693
    @belindabrown8693 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If you guys are wondering the fourth dimension is a world were you can see everything and shapes with a cube you see every side so there will be more sides and you can see all of the cube even inside the cube will be inside and outside so this cube will be a while different shape

    • @YourboyGun
      @YourboyGun 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I still don't get It

  • @MazzieAlizae184
    @MazzieAlizae184 3 ปีที่แล้ว +138

    "This 2 dimensional bubble casts a 1 dimensional shadow. A 3 dimensional bubble casts a 2 dimensional shadow. A 4 dimensional bubble casts a 3 dimensional shadow. It is beyond comprehension!"
    -that one episode of adventure time

    • @mateuszszulecki5206
      @mateuszszulecki5206 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Episode name?

    • @jayrolleful
      @jayrolleful 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      A 5d dimensional object Casts a 4th dimensional shadow

    • @myriam2178
      @myriam2178 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I was thinking about that the whole time i watched thisss

    • @SS-gt8sy
      @SS-gt8sy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jayrolleful a x dimensional object cast x-1 dimensional shadow where x€N

    • @FC-ic7gt
      @FC-ic7gt 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      We are living in the 3 dimensional shadow. Plato

  • @thefrub
    @thefrub 6 ปีที่แล้ว +421

    This is the sixth video about 4D I've watched. I understand NOTHING. My brain is just too visual, if I can't picture something then I can't process it.

    • @lackingpotatoes
      @lackingpotatoes 6 ปีที่แล้ว +86

      That's the thing about visualizing higher dimensions, it's impossible. No matter what way you try to visualize moving in a fourth direction, it will always be a three dimensional movement because we live in a three dimensional space, luckily we can theorize a two or one dimensional space to help us better understand the space around us.

    • @carver7954
      @carver7954 6 ปีที่แล้ว +77

      This is like trying to imagine what blind people see. They don't see what we see when we close our eyes, they see what we see when we try to see outta our elbows, or back of our head.

    • @lackingpotatoes
      @lackingpotatoes 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Carver Ivens Exactly

    • @tacticalchunder1207
      @tacticalchunder1207 6 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      Unfortunately we cannot comprehend it, only speculate.

    • @lackingpotatoes
      @lackingpotatoes 6 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Diamond Beau I'm a sophomore, what's your point.

  • @nottechytutorials
    @nottechytutorials ปีที่แล้ว

    This was very educational. Thank you.

  • @amirfatemi8317
    @amirfatemi8317 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Therapist: "4D object are hypothetical. They don't exi-"
    Gaia BH1: "Hold my graviton beer."

  • @epictoasttm
    @epictoasttm 6 ปีที่แล้ว +153

    Wait... then is there a whole new world we can’t see because our brains can’t comprehend the other dimensions?

    • @asylvis3311
      @asylvis3311 6 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      EpicToast Animations not necessarily, it IS our world...kinda. Reality is simply what we perceive as reality

    • @asylvis3311
      @asylvis3311 6 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      So, it’s the same world, but a different perspective

    • @carver7954
      @carver7954 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      If we suddenly could see higher dimensions, we could tell the future, and maybe travel thru it. So, yes and no.

    • @davecrupel2817
      @davecrupel2817 6 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      AssassinCraft7 -A.D. An ant can't see outer space. It isnt a part of their reality.
      But that doesnt mean it doesnt exist....

    • @lilypad1501
      @lilypad1501 6 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      EpicToast Animations he didn't really explain it fully.. our world is more then what we can see.. if we could see in 4d, then you would be able to see yourself in every time frame. You could see yourself being born or you could see yourself dying..your whole life would be in front of you. That is what 4d is..

  • @halluminium
    @halluminium 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Thank you for this.
    I was finally able to leave this plane of existence and trancend.

  • @God-yb2cg
    @God-yb2cg 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Apart from bad audio, this was the best video explaining 4D I've ever watched.
    (And I still don't understand it)

  • @mcnole25
    @mcnole25 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Meanwhile in another universe:
    A 2-dimensional being goes on his 1-dimensional computer to describe 3 dimensions.

    • @romantum
      @romantum 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      ..then goes to youtube and complaints in the comments about why even bother, because clearly time is the 3d dimension!

  • @jlvchhh
    @jlvchhh 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    this is actually a good explanation. i really cant imagine a 4d before because we clearly cant perceive 4d things in our 3d world but this vid helps me a lot to understand. Thank u so much. and no, this isnt for my science project. i just love learning new interesting things wieeee

  • @cyoksu
    @cyoksu 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    this is like the only video that helps me understand 4d. it's such a mystical concept and i love it

  • @dirtbagpoteddirt8202
    @dirtbagpoteddirt8202 ปีที่แล้ว

    i remeber watching this when i was new to the 4th dimension now i look back and see how far ive come

  • @ViewMyChannelAndBeBlessed
    @ViewMyChannelAndBeBlessed 5 ปีที่แล้ว +134

    Play SIMS. You'll understand what it's like to live in the 4th dimension

    • @vbgvbg1133
      @vbgvbg1133 4 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      Technically speaking, the screen is still 2D with graphics emulating 3D

    • @jacobmiller3933
      @jacobmiller3933 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      We need holograms before we can understand it

    • @nedwizard
      @nedwizard 4 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      Nah. 4D creatures are able to see our organs, brains and lungs just as fine as we can see internals of 2D creatures. They perceive 3D volume as a whole just as we perceive plane as a whole.

    • @frogman9753
      @frogman9753 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@nedwizard bruh freaky

    • @atrudokht
      @atrudokht 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I play SIMS from version 1 to 4 but still don't get it.

  • @Ducksauce33
    @Ducksauce33 6 ปีที่แล้ว +402

    That made your day drawing that exploding cube flip book didn't it?😁

    • @e13cess
      @e13cess 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      and the duck in your sauce made yours
      .lol

    • @saaketdayal4281
      @saaketdayal4281 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It’s night time here…

    • @jonarbuckle980
      @jonarbuckle980 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      it's not a cube it's a tesseract

    • @sabatino1977
      @sabatino1977 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I think he means the ones drawn on the yellow sticky notes. The flipbook.

    • @juggernaut3338
      @juggernaut3338 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Måns Spång no shit. Tell me you did not see the Avengers ! COME ON!!!

  • @Matthew-jr9sf
    @Matthew-jr9sf ปีที่แล้ว

    You are the box. And the circle, that's your spirit, your essence, your consciousness

  • @victorl225
    @victorl225 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I like to watch videos like this from time to time to remind myself how dumb I am.

  • @webgpu
    @webgpu 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    0:52 that animation alone deserves a like ;-)

  • @M1551NGN0
    @M1551NGN0 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    1:11 that 4D tesseract diagram on a 2D plane is the most neat i have ever seen.
    Plus it baffles my mind in the sense that we already see 3D objects on our 2D screens or pages. But here, we are seeing a 2D representation of a 4D object on a 2D plane inside a 2D screen!

  • @mrsteve-yg7fu
    @mrsteve-yg7fu ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Now I can know how my dog feels like when im talking to him.

  • @bschneidez
    @bschneidez 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    My main take-away was that if you could see in 4d, then no clothing could ever hide sweet bazongas from my view..... I now have a new dream.
    Ironically, this line of thinking is basically how life perpetuates itself and facilitates evolution. You are all very welcome.

  • @c412b
    @c412b 5 ปีที่แล้ว +285

    Are ghosts shadows of 4D beings? 😮

    • @Manzo__
      @Manzo__ 5 ปีที่แล้ว +55

      A month late, but they could technically be 4D beings a shadow leaking over to our dimension

    • @Juanmoneche
      @Juanmoneche 5 ปีที่แล้ว +38

      Tecnically a shadow of a 4d ghost should be a 3d object not a 2d

    • @CaptainZombiee
      @CaptainZombiee 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@Juanmoneche could a ghost just be a 2d being breaking into our 3d world?

    • @_neophyte
      @_neophyte 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      so you're just gonna assume ghosts actually exist

    • @alexanderfagerdal8195
      @alexanderfagerdal8195 5 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Sosig Not the ghost as we know it, you know the way people think it’s a spirit from a dead body that’s stuck between worlds because those things don’t exist in science, but instead ”ghosts” would be 4D entities that we somehow can sense but not see. But in instances when we do see them would probably be because they somehow got into our 3D world and my personal explaination based on theories of when people hear ”ghosts talk” is that sound can bounce through levels of different dimensions so it passes though our level sometimes, so we can’t see the entities talking because they exist on another level, however, we can hear the sound waves made by them because it bounces to our level