Classical & Positivist Schools of Criminological Thought

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 44

  • @connorfranklin2035
    @connorfranklin2035 4 ปีที่แล้ว +54

    I’ve currently got this for my university module and this video has helped out massively by making it clear so thank you

  • @eduardbatres1447
    @eduardbatres1447 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    I have to say, I’ve been studying psychology and criminology, but the way you break it all down is AMAZING, for lack of a better word, sometimes I feel academic studies, while amazingly informative and enlightening can also be deterring due to the complexity of the language which when one thinks about, should be the other way around.... Thank you for your work.

  • @laurawiseman3931
    @laurawiseman3931 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    This is a very clear cut and upbeat representation of the classical and positivist schools of criminology and has really helped consolidate my understanding, thank you!

  • @ellenevo6802
    @ellenevo6802 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hello Dr. Silva, Looking forward to the semester!

  • @natalieteale4153
    @natalieteale4153 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Currently studuing my bachelors in Criminology and this helped me understand so much! Thank you!

  • @tentanghukumkita6381
    @tentanghukumkita6381 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Classical & Positivist Schools of Criminological Thought
    Thank you, very useful.

  • @heatherstonebrook9787
    @heatherstonebrook9787 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This video helped me to understand how the different theories are offering reasons for criminal behavior and why people commit crimes. The way you explained the different concepts and reasons for criminal behavior was GREAT. Thank you I will be searching for other videos you have.

  • @za6188
    @za6188 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This break down is great! thanks

  • @annaenigma9673
    @annaenigma9673 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you! So clear.

  • @larosekevin945
    @larosekevin945 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video and very clear explanation thank you

  • @JRFShashank
    @JRFShashank 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Delightful session!! 🌸🌸

  • @Livingtruth2024
    @Livingtruth2024 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent explanation, easily understood

  • @chelsiesmith
    @chelsiesmith 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    thank you! helping my with my uni essay!

  • @OLacoste
    @OLacoste หลายเดือนก่อน

    great 👍

  • @DrPerlyl
    @DrPerlyl ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent presentation.

  • @lanehunters_uk
    @lanehunters_uk 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is amazing! Thank you!

  • @que_siba
    @que_siba 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you Dr for summarising it for us.

  • @noorazam2287
    @noorazam2287 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thankyou so much for this video. I was confused when i started to learn these theories but now i have a very clear concept. Please keep it up

  • @MakeBetterStuff
    @MakeBetterStuff 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great explanation of these two schools of thought. I find aspects of both interesting. The main issue I see with the Positivist School is that it could lead to lesser punishments for people from low income communities of color VS their white peers. While sociological factors and learned behavior are important considerations, there is something about giving a lesser sentence based on life circumstances that I see as problematic. Equally problematic is tying the judge's hands to mandatory minimum sentencing laws. A catch-22 that warrants a lot more conversation.

  • @ellieroberts5520
    @ellieroberts5520 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    So so so helpful thank you ! Made it so clear

  • @leissgTV
    @leissgTV 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    GREAT VIDEO

  • @somtouwazie504
    @somtouwazie504 ปีที่แล้ว

    Brilliant delivery

  • @nontobekomthembu4180
    @nontobekomthembu4180 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Criminology and Psychology major over here. I'm having these chapters for school, thanks for breaking it down.😊

  • @dranuragdeepiliindianlawin1168
    @dranuragdeepiliindianlawin1168 ปีที่แล้ว

    good one, the example of robbery is appreciable

  • @kanishktewari9854
    @kanishktewari9854 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you so much!

  • @kajalchawla8864
    @kajalchawla8864 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for explaining

  • @morlaisawaneh1684
    @morlaisawaneh1684 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello Dr. Jason,
    Thank you for such an explicit summary of Criminological theories, what book will you recommend to me for criminology theory? And can you please make a video that shows the difference between Criminology theories and Criminal Justice theories. Thank you.

  • @ritchelazarcon4336
    @ritchelazarcon4336 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    this help making my modules

  • @Sonia4uuu
    @Sonia4uuu 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you so much

  • @trashpanda5869
    @trashpanda5869 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice

  • @ChimozuFu
    @ChimozuFu 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    11:42 does anyone know where this statistic comes from?

    • @stardustfactory8311
      @stardustfactory8311 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      type the stat into google and the engine will match it to the right source for you. Works for lyrics to songs too.

    • @ChimozuFu
      @ChimozuFu 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@stardustfactory8311 thank you.

  • @kinzaahmed3857
    @kinzaahmed3857 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you!

  • @RinzSach
    @RinzSach 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sigmund Freud is the father of psychoanalysis not psychology, that's William Wundt

  • @bosconator
    @bosconator 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Exemplary 👍🏻

  • @carolyngordon6454
    @carolyngordon6454 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great presentation but Freud is not the father of psychology. He is the father of psychoanalysis

  • @vinayajoseph7025
    @vinayajoseph7025 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Who are criminaloids?

  • @RiccardoandCoral
    @RiccardoandCoral 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I often heard this theory that he was racist but I have to disagree. He made the mistake, as you mentioned already, of studying criminals in prison. That also means that he did not have control over who went to prison or not. At that time, the 800s, in Italy there was still a lot of racism and there will continue to be up until after the fascism period. This means that he studies only those put into prison by the police officers which means that if anyone was racist it would have been the police and not necessarily him. He might have been racist too but we cannot theorise it from the fact that he said that all black people were criminals basically as it was beyond his control.

    • @highb33kay
      @highb33kay 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The video says his ideas are rooted in racism not that he was racist.

  • @dpear387
    @dpear387 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Side note** I'm gonna need you to blink a little bit more in your videos.
    I did like your video, very good information.

  • @makubianfantasy
    @makubianfantasy ปีที่แล้ว

    be-CAH-rya

  • @zubairkhan1439
    @zubairkhan1439 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Could you kindly mention your email address please ! Need some assistance in the research