@4:52 you say that results are a combination of how much pressure you have, how much O2 you have, and how much time you spend in the chamber. I also just heard you say in another video (or was it your zoom session?) that shorter, more frequent sessions are more effective than longer sessions in the chamber (‘frequency trumps duration’). So two 1-hour sessions are better than one 2-hour session, because certain benefits are gained as the body reacclimates to atmospheric pressure. Correct me if i’m wrong..
Both are true..... the equation for dosage is pressure, oxygen and time, yes. And frequency/duration is another tool to manipulate the benefits. Does that help?
@@HBOTUSA Is the risk of cataract formation the same for two 1-hour sessions, as it is for one 2-hour session? Is the risk of cataract formation worse for 100% oxygen compared to mildly enriched oxygen?
There are certainly reasons to believe that there are many regenerate qualities of mild hyperbaric therapy as well. To date the Telemere study i think you are referring to was done at 2 ata. There is no research to say that it would or would not do the same.
To get full benefits use the hard chamber, there are many studies we're conducted and proved that soft chamber is never meant to be used as oxygen therapy
@@manofsan There is not a tremendous difference between 95 or 100%. These chambers create up to a 2.5x increase in oxygen exposure which is significant and can help many things. Certain infections should have higher pressure, as should wound care and burn treatment, air embolism and a handful of other severe conditions. Most other cbronic conditions or inflammatory issues seem to do well with this levels of oxygen exposure
@@HBOTUSA I have not yet tried HBOT, and am in the process of researching it, because I think it's a good fit for my needs. I'm glad that companies like yours are bringing this technology to the home consumer market, so that more people can reap the benefits. Is 1.3 ATA the limit for home systems?
Reason I wont use soft one again: while filling with air to test, heard a large explosion! Turned around with a start to find window flown out in a corner-if I had been in chamber good chance I would have damaged my hearing-am getting a metal chamber,lol
Hey Byron white formulas, absolutely, like any device there are inherent risks. Soft and hard chambers need to be manufactured to certain specs and need to be inspected regularly for and defects. We have used hard and soft chambers for well over a decade. I am very aware of certain chambers out there not being built to proper specifications which adds a whole other level of unnecessary risk. Was this a new or used chamber? PS we use your formulas regularly in our clinics.
Both could help, but higher pressure for this might be more effective depending on the extent of the issue. Shockwave and hyperbaric seem to be very effective for ED.
What about a holistic clinic that advertises HBOT but they do not use 100% oxygen in the chambers but room air pumped in and then you wear an oxygen mask - is this a true HBOT treatment then? Much safer but….
Great question Caroline! The short answer is yes, that is still HBOT. We did a video recently about the differences in equipment types, including chambers that are pressurized with air (and the patient gets supplemental oxygen) vs. pressurized with 100% oxygen. You can view that video here: th-cam.com/video/GBgt7ugaujQ/w-d-xo.html
people who have a hard shell deep dive at a hospital for major medical problems should convert to a soft shell for maintenance after recovery with hard shell
Finally an explanation I can run with.
Perfect! Thank you.
Thank you!! You earned another subscriber!!!
Awesome, glad to have you!
What is good for valley fever
Nodules in lungs
I need one of these for my house
@4:52 you say that results are a combination of how much pressure you have, how much O2 you have, and how much time you spend in the chamber.
I also just heard you say in another video (or was it your zoom session?) that shorter, more frequent sessions are more effective than longer sessions in the chamber (‘frequency trumps duration’). So two 1-hour sessions are better than one 2-hour session, because certain benefits are gained as the body reacclimates to atmospheric pressure. Correct me if i’m wrong..
Both are true..... the equation for dosage is pressure, oxygen and time, yes. And frequency/duration is another tool to manipulate the benefits. Does that help?
@@HBOTUSA yes, as long as i’m correct in thinking two 1-hour sessions are more beneficial than one 2-hour session...🤔
@@HBOTUSA Is the risk of cataract formation the same for two 1-hour sessions, as it is for one 2-hour session? Is the risk of cataract formation worse for 100% oxygen compared to mildly enriched oxygen?
@@manofsan it is more a function of pressure than oxygen level. This has only been seen in the research at high pressure hbot.
Can you get the aging reversal effects as shown in new studies with soft chambers?
There are certainly reasons to believe that there are many regenerate qualities of mild hyperbaric therapy as well. To date the Telemere study i think you are referring to was done at 2 ata. There is no research to say that it would or would not do the same.
To get full benefits use the hard chamber, there are many studies we're conducted and proved that soft chamber is never meant to be used as oxygen therapy
You've said that soft-shelled chambers can only go to mildly elevated pressures, like 1.3 atmospheres. What oxygen levels can they reach?
You can use an oxygen concentrator which is capable of.up to about 95% O2
@@HBOTUSA So medically/physiologically, is there a tremendous difference between 95% and 100% O2? Which conditions might usually require 100%?
@@manofsan There is not a tremendous difference between 95 or 100%. These chambers create up to a 2.5x increase in oxygen exposure which is significant and can help many things. Certain infections should have higher pressure, as should wound care and burn treatment, air embolism and a handful of other severe conditions. Most other cbronic conditions or inflammatory issues seem to do well with this levels of oxygen exposure
I appreciate all of your interest in our videos. Are you using a chamber or looking into it?
@@HBOTUSA I have not yet tried HBOT, and am in the process of researching it, because I think it's a good fit for my needs. I'm glad that companies like yours are bringing this technology to the home consumer market, so that more people can reap the benefits. Is 1.3 ATA the limit for home systems?
Can you do, maybe you have, a discussion on Macular degeneration please 🙏
Reason I wont use soft one again: while filling with air to test, heard a large explosion! Turned around with a start to find window flown out in a corner-if I had been in chamber good chance I would have damaged my hearing-am getting a metal chamber,lol
Hey Byron white formulas, absolutely, like any device there are inherent risks. Soft and hard chambers need to be manufactured to certain specs and need to be inspected regularly for and defects. We have used hard and soft chambers for well over a decade. I am very aware of certain chambers out there not being built to proper specifications which adds a whole other level of unnecessary risk. Was this a new or used chamber?
PS we use your formulas regularly in our clinics.
What would you recommend for someone who is trying to increase blood circulation or improve ED
Both could help, but higher pressure for this might be more effective depending on the extent of the issue. Shockwave and hyperbaric seem to be very effective for ED.
Have they tried divers mixture for cov19 if not why what max pressure human can take what long term side effects
Which is better for post C shortness of breath? I’m having gas exchange issues for 5mths now.
What about a holistic clinic that advertises HBOT but they do not use 100% oxygen in the chambers but room air pumped in and then you wear an oxygen mask - is this a true HBOT treatment then? Much safer but….
Great question Caroline! The short answer is yes, that is still HBOT. We did a video recently about the differences in equipment types, including chambers that are pressurized with air (and the patient gets supplemental oxygen) vs. pressurized with 100% oxygen. You can view that video here: th-cam.com/video/GBgt7ugaujQ/w-d-xo.html
In spine
people who have a hard shell deep dive at a hospital for major medical problems should convert to a soft shell for maintenance after recovery with hard shell