@@MovingPicsOfficial I actually do judge people based on their relationship to the National Socialist party of Germany, guess I'm weird!!! I should be sucking off inbred royals like you guys
"I'm sure talking to a guy about how his grandfather was assassinated, how his family had to flee their country under threat of being murdered, how his mom was put into a psych ward, his father abandoning his family and say his sisters were Nazis, won't make him upset at all"
why would she be trying not to make him upset? making him upset is far more interesting journalism for such a stoic family not to mention hes a piece of shit royal so he doesn't exactly deserve kindness
He had a difficult past, and this insensitive reporter wants to talk and release private information to the public. Anyone would be pissed off at her, especially since she was friendly to him at first, and then she turned out to be a total bitch
Her point was that if someone has influence, fame and power, especially at a state level, then them not wanting to talk about something is tough beans because the people who are affected by their decisions have a right to know the genesis of those decisions.
@@MEMUNDOLOL Do you consider yourself a Chicken? Because personally i'm a thinking human being at the whim of these peoples decisions and i think we should absolutely know why they make the decisions that affect us, you know as thinking feeling humans capable of higher thought than a fucking farm animal.
@@voxnewmanwhat utter nonsense. My boss has far more direct influence and power over my life then Phillip ever had over the average Brit, that doesn't make me entitled to invade his privacy and dig up his personal trauma to "know the genesis of his decisions." All human beings are entitled to the same degree of respect and privacy, there are no exceptions to this.
@BushnoSkillzz what a stupid comparison. You can quit your job and remove his influence. Not so with an unelected hereditary member of the state. And if you believe that a small business owner has more influence over your life than the state or even a large corporation does, then you're delusional.
That is not the journalist's fault. He is a public figure, if he can't take that kind of interviews he is not very good in his job, assuming you can consider a job having no real political power and just living in a big palace thanks to the people's taxes.
@@LorsciaVery true, especially with his personality about being all tough and un intimidated, yet he couldn’t maintain decorum with personal questions? I think the reporter knew what she was doing; that she was impertinent , as it to get a rise out of Philip. However, Philip did not have the emotional intelligence to simply rebuff her intentions, and as the episode showed, his agreement to an interview was not out of honorable intentions. They’re both in the wrong.
Are we really supposed to accept every word spoken in 'The Crown' as the truth? Even one of the producers - in response to criticism of the scripts as opposed to history - 'the viewing public are not stupid - they will know they are watching an adaption of how things could have happened, not necessarily how they did actually happen' - so there you have it from one of the sources - no - 'The Crown' was not a true depiction of history
Holy cow the body language change. The change from open and in her space to incredibly closed off and with a Sir. And note how the bedroom door was open. I highly doubt that would be open.
@@elliotdavies1418that’s the problem with people. Know her place? His sisters were all nazis but, don’t look behind the curtain. The plebs must know their place.
Anne ur clearly fucking delusional why would u not want the world to know the truth that our own royal family has deep ties to fascist regimes which want to EXTERMINATE CERTAIN DEMOGRAPHICS u fucking tool
![ILLSLICK X YOUNGOHM - We're The same [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/yUJNkobYR0E/mqdefault.jpg)
What a great scene! Do you judge a book by its cover?
That the only way to first judge something, by his cover.
@@MovingPicsOfficial I actually do judge people based on their relationship to the National Socialist party of Germany, guess I'm weird!!! I should be sucking off inbred royals like you guys
"I'm sure talking to a guy about how his grandfather was assassinated, how his family had to flee their country under threat of being murdered, how his mom was put into a psych ward, his father abandoning his family and say his sisters were Nazis, won't make him upset at all"
Journalists ask the hard questions. It's quite literally their job
@appocalypsechild Yeah but those were really fucking personal weren't they
why would she be trying not to make him upset? making him upset is far more interesting journalism for such a stoic family not to mention hes a piece of shit royal so he doesn't exactly deserve kindness
Because it's the decent human thing to do, to not remind someone of countless traumatic events of their life
@@limerency5834
@@limerency5834 You seem horribly butthurt. Cry more
Philip looks like he wants to hit this reporter, that look and the blinking, he has quite a temper I heard. I love the first season of The Crown.
He had a difficult past, and this insensitive reporter wants to talk and release private information to the public. Anyone would be pissed off at her, especially since she was friendly to him at first, and then she turned out to be a total bitch
You heard 😂 like personally 😂 it’s well known. There is lots of footage of him losing her patience
She's lucky, Daemon wouldn't have taken that so well.
Matt Smith playing the honorable an honorable version of Daemon.
She was so rude. Not everyone wants to talk about their trauma for the world to know.
Her point was that if someone has influence, fame and power, especially at a state level, then them not wanting to talk about something is tough beans because the people who are affected by their decisions have a right to know the genesis of those decisions.
@@MEMUNDOLOL Do you consider yourself a Chicken? Because personally i'm a thinking human being at the whim of these peoples decisions and i think we should absolutely know why they make the decisions that affect us, you know as thinking feeling humans capable of higher thought than a fucking farm animal.
@@MEMUNDOLOL We're not chickens mate
@@voxnewmanwhat utter nonsense. My boss has far more direct influence and power over my life then Phillip ever had over the average Brit, that doesn't make me entitled to invade his privacy and dig up his personal trauma to "know the genesis of his decisions." All human beings are entitled to the same degree of respect and privacy, there are no exceptions to this.
@BushnoSkillzz what a stupid comparison. You can quit your job and remove his influence. Not so with an unelected hereditary member of the state. And if you believe that a small business owner has more influence over your life than the state or even a large corporation does, then you're delusional.
This does not ring true for its time. No journalist then would have been so brazen and disrespectful of a Royal.
Clearly you don't know Republicans (no not those ones, but yeah also those ones), they've been staunch anti-monarchists for decades.
Yeah, they may have worded it differently and come off more friendly
Like they wouldn't to Trump?
@@Twentythousandlps Can we suppose the screenwriters took some inspiration from the sleazier tabloids?
You were alive back then?
She’s not much of a journalist. All she does is put his walls up rather than get information out
That is not the journalist's fault. He is a public figure, if he can't take that kind of interviews he is not very good in his job, assuming you can consider a job having no real political power and just living in a big palace thanks to the people's taxes.
@@Lorscia Well, if he could take it, he just would avoid the questions. I.e either way the journalist wouldn’t get information i.e bad journalist
@@LorsciaVery true, especially with his personality about being all tough and un intimidated, yet he couldn’t maintain decorum with personal questions? I think the reporter knew what she was doing; that she was impertinent , as it to get a rise out of Philip. However, Philip did not have the emotional intelligence to simply rebuff her intentions, and as the episode showed, his agreement to an interview was not out of honorable intentions. They’re both in the wrong.
Are we really supposed to accept every word spoken in 'The Crown' as the truth? Even one of the producers - in response to criticism of the scripts as opposed to history - 'the viewing public are not stupid - they will know they are watching an adaption of how things could have happened, not necessarily how they did actually happen' - so there you have it from one of the sources - no - 'The Crown' was not a true depiction of history
@@susanlockyer1192 What are you ranting about?
I didn’t say it was real. I said she’s a sucky journalist.
an extremely unlikely conversation
better than expected
Matt is so good
Holy cow the body language change. The change from open and in her space to incredibly closed off and with a Sir.
And note how the bedroom door was open. I highly doubt that would be open.
She should know her place.
@@elliotdavies1418that’s the problem with people. Know her place? His sisters were all nazis but, don’t look behind the curtain. The plebs must know their place.
@@elliotdavies1418 that's what you took away from this? Yikes!
@ she is Australian.
@@elliotdavies1418 ? Explain yourself
She is not a very good Journalist
I’ll take journalists from back then over ITV and BBC news left wingers have destroyed journalism
The royals aren’t very good people so it fits
Why? Because she asked questions hard to answer for the other person. If you are not asking hard questions you are not doing your job as a journalist.
@@Lorscia and whose a good journalist? It certainly isn’t any of the mainstream news medias in the world
Anne ur clearly fucking delusional why would u not want the world to know the truth that our own royal family has deep ties to fascist regimes which want to EXTERMINATE CERTAIN DEMOGRAPHICS u fucking tool
He something else ❤🔥
Reporters are just DISGUSTING
He was so good in this role.
Has a certain reputation as a serial philanderer - sailing in the South Seas with young ladies aboard, allegedly 🤔
@@robertdoyle687 Are you pointing the finger at Rice Krispies, Froot Loops or Lucky Charms? 😁
It must’ve been uncomfortable for the actress
@@PatrickStephens-hc5sp Both could be having the time of their lives; with skill and good direction we might never be the wiser.
Why?
@ saying such things in all seriousness
So do we have to feel sorry for him now??? Oh poor man he lived in the most priveleged best Places of the world and was served his every wim,....😅😂
It wouldn't be a female interviewer in the 1950s, not for anything serious
From one take to the next someone wasn’t paying attention. Way to much difference between takes.
Sounds like a typical Fox News interview
How about cnn nbc msnbc or BBC
Is this Lord Mountbottom?
This is the same kind of tactless crap Trump faces daily...
Imagine defending a pedo.
Leaders deserve hard questions considering they hold our lives in their hands
And tRump doesn’t deserve it because he’s the epitome of tact and diplomacy?
And he doesn’t deserve it because he’s the epitome of tact and diplomacy?
It's amazing to see a Trump supporter use the word "tact." I don't think you know what that means. Or, you only apply it when it's to your benefit.
I dont know what this shit is, I just know im happy its not something I watch 🤣