Doku absolutely does kick the ball away. Michael Oliver isn’t pointing to where the foul occurred for one, so he’s already mucked that up, but then Doku kicks the ball so that it winds up a good 5 yards back from where the referee is indicating, nowhere near an Arsenal player and miles off from where the foul occurred (which is just inside the City half). It has to be a yellow for consistency, but it isn’t because they don’t actually give a goose’s bollocks about consistency
@@DanMartinez-qu2iw and you personally guarantee that city ownership, the saudis are not at all corrupt ? Do you happen to know anything about saudi at all mate
You can say that he stuck to the rules but last season kovacic should've been sent off, Howard Webb said afterwards that Oliver didn't send him off as he didn't want to ruin the game. So why did he want to ruin this game? Why didn't he stick to the rules last time? Also, the trossard thing happened right before half time, they was already passed the 45 minutes so who's to say he wasn't kicking it away thinking the ref had blown for half time.
@@Agency_AnonThat's without even going into the whole thing about the same ref being paid 10x the normal amount a ref is paid to officiate games for city's owners back home. They don't see that as a problem, he's obviously gonna have a slight bit of favouritism towards the team who's paying him big bucks.
Y'all are so blinded by your gooner worship. Trossard booting it towards moon. Doku passing it towards where free kick should be taken. Because you gooner dumbasses always attempt to take free kicks from way ahead of where it should be taken from
I know Mark is afraid to criticize the league of being corrupt. But the regular viewer is not a sheep. We can see it clear as day that some refs are bought.
@@bakailfrozen1944bruv don’t be daft. City did so just as much. It was a cagey affair. Halland decked and arsenal player, akanji gave gabriel a shove shortly before the red card. Etc etc
'a referee is there too entertain' - this is mad. As a neutral fan, the referee is there to enforce the rules and officiate the game. The rules are the rules, if that should've been a card per the rulebook they were right to give the card, end of.
@@ItsAv3rageGamer I have more of a problem with him saying that at the time than with him actually not doing that and enforcing the rules properly as he did here. Unfortunate there is inconsistency, but I think this is the correct approach, not back then.
I disagree with some of what Mark is saying. The job of a referee is to enforce the rules in a manner that is fair to both teams. They are not there for entertainment. That’s the players job. The only reason the match official should not have given a second yellow card to Trossard is that he might not have heard the whistle. There was only a fraction of a second between the whistle and his kick of the ball. Under those circumstances, the referee should have exercised his discretion and not shown the yellow card. But that is a judgment call. This is a case where the call was likely correct but the result was wrong. Lastly Erling should have received a straight red card for his violent conduct. Smashing the ball off an opponent’s head must be considered violent conduct. If he is not suspended, the league is saying that this behavior is legal and acceptable. To me, this issue is a much bigger issue than the second yellow to Trossard.
Just like the Rice call, would anyone have cared if they DIDN'T get carded? If no card comes out, is everyone talking about no cards coming out?!? NO! They're talking about the game. Instead, both get carded, and now the entire season will be defined by 2 games in which the refs took a possible 4 points. We'll be talking about this in May. Those 4 points will be huge by the end of the year.
The point of the ref is to let the game flow? So when there's an obvious foul on United and the ref lets the game go on I'm sure Mark would be fine with it
What I can’t get my head around is why it should be ok to break the rules in a ”massive game” compared to other games wich is what Goldbridge says. Blame the rulebrakers for ”ruining” the game!
''Entertainment Sport'' Mark this is not the WWE, football is a competitive real sport and referees are there to enforce the rules! If you want an entertainment sport go watch the WWE.
Wrong... its pure entertainment. If you think 'the fans make the game' then it IS entertainment. If you're one lf those people (like me) who thinks COVID proved that fans DONT matter, then it isn't entertainment. I have a feeling you are on the side of 'the fans make the game'..
@nhd6128 Execpt the ref isn't meant to be the entertainment, that's the players job to be entertaining, if the ref is not enforcing the rules it will be just chaos and you have no game at all.
Genuine question for anyone who thinks Mark is right, if Mark's point is the ref should let the game flow then wtf wouldn't he punish Trossard for not letting the game flow by kicking the ball away
Honestly Mark, you're talking out of your arse. Trossard was lucky not to go for the foul, kicking the ball away was plain stupid. If you had been talking about Declan Rice's red against Brighton the other week, you'd have been bang on, but you're not talking from a neutral point of view, you're talking from the view of someone who hates City. If the match had been Man United vs Arsenal, you'd be buying the ref flowers.
@@tom11mansfield Oliver was just rubbish. Haaland had like 4 offences that you could at least consider a yellow card (and that throwing ball into Arsenal play could have been red), but also Olivier is basically responsible for Calafiori goal. You just cannot call team captains, instructed them to calm their players, and restart the game when Walker did not got back onto his position, because he was instructing City players to calm down. He even did not look if Walker is anywhere near the place he should have been. If Oliver is corrupted City fan then he is extremely incompetent in his corruption, because if he really would favour City he would check five times if Walker is on his position.
What is the point of having another person with you if you don't let them talk when they're trying to and are just stubborn with your unreasonable opinions
So another new rule only for city? The ref must make sure city are fully prepared before allowing play to continue? Bear in mind walker was back in position but too busy shouting at his team mates rather than watching the game
@davederave134 exactly if were being fair then we don't wait for city to be ready.. when has that ever been a rule? Liverpool barca and origi springs to mind but had that been against city, it'd be labelled as unfair cause they weren't ready
100% a second yellow. Yes it ruined the game but if this was man city v southampton nobody would even be on about it. You can't give the ref any reason to give you a yellow when you're already on one, trossards mistake. BUT I will say he didn't dish out yellows when city kicked the ball away
It's very hypocritical to complain about injustice in the refereeing decisions yesterday without talking about how Arsenal got into the game because Michael Oliver allowed a quick take of the free kick 10 yards from the initial foul and having pulled Walker from his position. I agree it's unfair that one team gets punished for an offence while the other team doesn't. But that doesn't take away the fact that Trossard still committed the offence. It's like complaining to a judge that you were caught stealing but the other perpetrator stole but didn't get caught, don't do the crime and you won't do the time. Simple!
Will mate, trossard kicked the ball 0.2 seconds after the whistle was blown… that’s not exaggerating, that’s factual. 0.2 seconds…. 0.2 you’re a muppet, what about haaland blowing through saliba? What about haaland throwing the ball at the back of gabi’s head? What about haaland plowing into partey after the equaliser? You absolute muppet
I like Will but he's totally wrong. Arsenal were setup to counter, so obviously the millisecond Trossard gets the ball his aim is to look up and pass forward. It's like these joker refs think footballers have the reflexes of flies
So you’re a muppet as well, he kicked it 0.26 seconds after the whistle was blown, I’d give you £5000 if you can go to boot a ball, I’ll blow the whistle and you have 0.26 seconds to stop your full power kick… and see how well that works. Plus, silva and Doku both did the exact same thing well well after the whistle… nothing happened to them. 🤡
@@RafaelSantos-di5yw yeah good advice, give it to city. None of you bots will ever admit that city committed way than double the fouls that Arsenal did, except whenever Arsenal slightly looked the wrong way, Oliver booked them yet haaland committed about what 4-5 serious fouls, man walked off the pitch with no card. Be quiet little one
@@Wolf-1211 selective reality! Ignoring the clear red card that you have no argument against which is why you completely ignored my argument and then waffling about Haaland? You're a certified yapper, constantly changing arguments to stuff that doesn't matter! What's next? You think Haaland should get whole season ban because he told Skelly "who tf are you?" Do yourself a favour and don't argue you div, literally none of what you said is relevant to my argument
Both of arsenal’s goals shouldn’t of counted either clearly blocking the goalkeeper and pulling the defender out of position to have a chat then allowing a quick restart so City would’ve still won
Look i’m trying to be as unbiased as possible here. Oliver had an absolute rotter for both teams, however i think the trossard yellow is the correct decision. First he elbows Silva in the back, which in some cases have been given a yellow, and then he kicks the ball away when Walker is going to get it wanting to take a quick free-kick. If you look back to when Silva and Doku kicked the ball away, no Arsenal player was intending to take a quick one so Oliver probably didn’t see it as a yellow card offense. All that being said however, i understand why fans are angry, the refs 1000% need to be more consistent And a word on the added time. Only 7 mins I thought was a joke but, Arsenal players were down with ‘cramp’ which lasted 2 mins (90-92) so the ref was most likely instructed to play 2 extra minutes over the allotted time because thats the amount of time the arsenal players were down for. Alas, Arsenal gave us a good test and we’ll see if this is a potential title deciding game.
"Cramp" all the players that went down were subbed off, and the goalkeeper was limping after. Rodri faking an injury 3 seconds into the game it's fine cause it's man city
Walker wasn't taking a quick free kick. In the frame where Trossard kicks it, the whistle is still in Oliver's mouth and Silva is on the ground. Walker was going to take a free kick with Silva still on the ground? While Arsenal already had ten men behind the ball?
Mark thinks it's the WWE, the premise for football is not entertainment football is a sport people play football in grounds with no fans and no tv coverage but would you still call that entertainment. No it's a sport that is played competitively and the entertainment part comes with it. Just because your not entertained mark doesn't mean they have to cater to your needs hahaha but I know your ego won't like that fact.
Then why are there fans there? Why do fans complain when a team 'doesn't play attractive football'... get a grip on reality, my friend, it is Sport & Entertainment.
A second yellow and sending a player off just isnt fair. A first yellow is fine but they need a different rule if already on a yellow, 5 minute sin bin or something like that. It's a stupid rule and refs should use common sense and try avoiding sending a player off due to a poor rule!
Why? Everyone knows that a second yellow means you get sent off. This isnt some brand new rule that they introduced yesterday. If you don't wanna get sent off for a second yellow then don't do something stupid whilst on a yellow card...
@ka5333 Never said it was a new rule but like every year they decide to enforce certain rules and the impact has been harsh in some instances. Like you said its not a new rule but to start sending people off this season is just ridiculous
Trossard should have received a yellow for the challenge alone deliberately and recklessly charged a player in the back never mind kicking the ball away
He lost his argument at the doku one Even contradicts himself saying ref pointed to the wrong place Then why should doku get a card for following ref instructions then
@francishammond9791 it's hilarious that city fans are so catered to by the refs that they've made an issue from something that happens to all other teams without a thought. It's only with city that the ref has to wait for them
Whinge whinge whinge always from the red teams it happens to all teams every week not just your lot but because other teams are not part of the so called big six it is ignored get over it and move on 😭😭😭😭
Not really, if you look back on it Trossard is ahead of the referee and doesn't know that the play stopped, he was trying to find the pass to Martinelli for the counter attack.
@@VelicoFides Relax Arsenal fan. He only gets payed millions a week to do his job as a professional. yet he fails at one of the most simplest of things. Not my fault.
![F.HERO Ft. JSPKK x ลำไย ไหทองคำ x M-PEE - ไม่สนิทบิดหมด (Thai Riders Anthem) [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kPJZ0UihBfk/mqdefault.jpg)
Who's the muppet in the black sweater? The time between the referees whistle and Trossard passing the ball to Martinelli is less than a second.
😂😂😂😂 literally smashed into Bernardo than kicks it away hoe is that not a yellow
I think hes trolling or he and goldbridge had an agreement that he always the opposite of goldbridge in the podcast to make it interesting
No need for name calling you lose your argument
Michael Oliver blew the whistle for the foul on Bernardo then gave trossard the 2nd yellow for kicking the ball away
@@Leon-ue5zeyellow card for both then 😂
How can you say Leo kicked the ball, but Doku didnt just piss off
Just say you didn’t watch the match you cry baby spastic 😂😂😂
Cuz that's what happened flick off
Considering it's clean on camera that kind of overrules your need to be the victim 😂
@@DanMartinez-qu2iw look at u replying everywhere defending city, jesus that is sad
Doku absolutely does kick the ball away. Michael Oliver isn’t pointing to where the foul occurred for one, so he’s already mucked that up, but then Doku kicks the ball so that it winds up a good 5 yards back from where the referee is indicating, nowhere near an Arsenal player and miles off from where the foul occurred (which is just inside the City half). It has to be a yellow for consistency, but it isn’t because they don’t actually give a goose’s bollocks about consistency
Oliver was paid 20000 pounds to officiate a man city owners friendly, if thats not a conflict of interest i dont know what is
City didn't play that friendly
Try harder😂
@@DanMartinez-qu2iw OK correction. Man city owners paid him. Still conflict of interests
@@rogerparker9228 and yet cleared by all organisations.... No difference to united giving refs Rolex watches for no real reason
@@DanMartinez-qu2iw and you personally guarantee that city ownership, the saudis are not at all corrupt ? Do you happen to know anything about saudi at all mate
@@whyhow4383 you lost your arguement at referencing the Saudis alongside city 😂 .... What you think is the issue 🤔
Most fans are sick of this favourable officiating, it's a disgrace
How was City v Arsenal favourable in anyway?
Cry more 😂
“The job of a referee is to entertain”- Mark Goldbridge
Once again Goldbridge is 100% common sense correct
You can say that he stuck to the rules but last season kovacic should've been sent off, Howard Webb said afterwards that Oliver didn't send him off as he didn't want to ruin the game. So why did he want to ruin this game? Why didn't he stick to the rules last time? Also, the trossard thing happened right before half time, they was already passed the 45 minutes so who's to say he wasn't kicking it away thinking the ref had blown for half time.
this needs to be at the front of the conversation
@@Agency_AnonThat's without even going into the whole thing about the same ref being paid 10x the normal amount a ref is paid to officiate games for city's owners back home. They don't see that as a problem, he's obviously gonna have a slight bit of favouritism towards the team who's paying him big bucks.
Everyone says that’s the rules , but the point is only consistency…. When Arsenal does it its a card , when City does it its just “move on”.
Y'all are so blinded by your gooner worship. Trossard booting it towards moon. Doku passing it towards where free kick should be taken. Because you gooner dumbasses always attempt to take free kicks from way ahead of where it should be taken from
Thank you Mark❤️👍
I know Mark is afraid to criticize the league of being corrupt. But the regular viewer is not a sheep. We can see it clear as day that some refs are bought.
Who’s the goober in black? His mom does his hair
Well said Goldbridge...👍
I challenge anyone to react in less than 1 second and pull out of a kick. Trossard kicked the ball 0.84 seconds after the whistle
0.26 seconds
@@Wolf-1211 behave
@@rogerparker9228 I’m just saying, been seeing people time it and most have shown as 0.26 seconds. I’m backing up your point
@@Wolf-1211 appologies
@@rogerparker9228 all good brother
Why did Haaland not get sent off for bouncing the ball of Gabriel's head, it's a joke
Yes its was funny as hell 😂
Arsenal should have won tbh
Nope. Arsenal had many dirty tackles
No way
@@bakailfrozen1944bruv don’t be daft. City did so just as much. It was a cagey affair. Halland decked and arsenal player, akanji gave gabriel a shove shortly before the red card. Etc etc
It’s crazy hearing city owners paid 20k to referee that the premier league then allowed him to ref how in all means that city fault?
mark is at his worst when he goes out of his way to say something controversial just to trend... '"the referee is there to entertain"... what????????
'a referee is there too entertain' - this is mad. As a neutral fan, the referee is there to enforce the rules and officiate the game. The rules are the rules, if that should've been a card per the rulebook they were right to give the card, end of.
Yet this same referee didn’t send off Kovacic last season because ‘he didn’t want to ruin the game.’
@@ItsAv3rageGamer I have more of a problem with him saying that at the time than with him actually not doing that and enforcing the rules properly as he did here. Unfortunate there is inconsistency, but I think this is the correct approach, not back then.
@@hg8300 very convenient for Man City that he chose to have two different approaches that just so happened to benefit them each time.
@@ItsAv3rageGamer He also didn't rule out either of the two Arsenal goals despite both of them being more then a little shady
@@todd1928Care to explain how they were shady? I’d love to hear the cope.
Thank u mark for being fair, only fair pundit on TH-cam. Well done🙌🙌
Anyone that has half a mullet needs ignoring. FACT
I disagree with some of what Mark is saying. The job of a referee is to enforce the rules in a manner that is fair to both teams. They are not there for entertainment. That’s the players job.
The only reason the match official should not have given a second yellow card to Trossard is that he might not have heard the whistle. There was only a fraction of a second between the whistle and his kick of the ball. Under those circumstances, the referee should have exercised his discretion and not shown the yellow card. But that is a judgment call. This is a case where the call was likely correct but the result was wrong.
Lastly Erling should have received a straight red card for his violent conduct. Smashing the ball off an opponent’s head must be considered violent conduct. If he is not suspended, the league is saying that this behavior is legal and acceptable. To me, this issue is a much bigger issue than the second yellow to Trossard.
Just think how much howard webb used to charge each game he fixed back when he used to reff
Just like the Rice call, would anyone have cared if they DIDN'T get carded? If no card comes out, is everyone talking about no cards coming out?!? NO! They're talking about the game. Instead, both get carded, and now the entire season will be defined by 2 games in which the refs took a possible 4 points. We'll be talking about this in May. Those 4 points will be huge by the end of the year.
The point of the ref is to let the game flow? So when there's an obvious foul on United and the ref lets the game go on I'm sure Mark would be fine with it
What I can’t get my head around is why it should be ok to break the rules in a ”massive game” compared to other games wich is what Goldbridge says. Blame the rulebrakers for ”ruining” the game!
''Entertainment Sport'' Mark this is not the WWE, football is a competitive real sport and referees are there to enforce the rules! If you want an entertainment sport go watch the WWE.
Wrong... its pure entertainment. If you think 'the fans make the game' then it IS entertainment. If you're one lf those people (like me) who thinks COVID proved that fans DONT matter, then it isn't entertainment. I have a feeling you are on the side of 'the fans make the game'..
@nhd6128 Execpt the ref isn't meant to be the entertainment, that's the players job to be entertaining, if the ref is not enforcing the rules it will be just chaos and you have no game at all.
Genuine question for anyone who thinks Mark is right, if Mark's point is the ref should let the game flow then wtf wouldn't he punish Trossard for not letting the game flow by kicking the ball away
I think each manager have 1 request for VAR check and ref need to answer to both manager
Honestly Mark, you're talking out of your arse. Trossard was lucky not to go for the foul, kicking the ball away was plain stupid. If you had been talking about Declan Rice's red against Brighton the other week, you'd have been bang on, but you're not talking from a neutral point of view, you're talking from the view of someone who hates City. If the match had been Man United vs Arsenal, you'd be buying the ref flowers.
The same unpunished foul haaland did on saliba early on? And there is the issue my friend
@@tom11mansfield Oliver was just rubbish. Haaland had like 4 offences that you could at least consider a yellow card (and that throwing ball into Arsenal play could have been red), but also Olivier is basically responsible for Calafiori goal. You just cannot call team captains, instructed them to calm their players, and restart the game when Walker did not got back onto his position, because he was instructing City players to calm down. He even did not look if Walker is anywhere near the place he should have been. If Oliver is corrupted City fan then he is extremely incompetent in his corruption, because if he really would favour City he would check five times if Walker is on his position.
@@Hadar1991 seems to be a running theme here with whoever is opposing city 🤔
What did trossard not foul silva on a yellow card, then kick the ball away?
as a neutral i turned off the game after the red no point of watching
What is the point of having another person with you if you don't let them talk when they're trying to and are just stubborn with your unreasonable opinions
Mark you clearly have an agenda. City have more of a case over Arsenal’s first goal. The red card is a simple application of the rules.
Haaland should have been booked and sent off himself
So man utd have 30 years of refereeing bias…. Silence. Bless.
Doku has no right touching the ball as per Howard Webb
Will is taking the piss
To be fair Oliver also cost Man city a goal when he took walker out of position to talk to him and let Arsenal take a quick free kick to cost city.
So another new rule only for city? The ref must make sure city are fully prepared before allowing play to continue? Bear in mind walker was back in position but too busy shouting at his team mates rather than watching the game
@@ashwilliams4959 Ash, I’m not a city fan but in trying to be fair to both sides, Oliver had a dreadful game and cost both teams.
@davederave134 exactly if were being fair then we don't wait for city to be ready.. when has that ever been a rule? Liverpool barca and origi springs to mind but had that been against city, it'd be labelled as unfair cause they weren't ready
@@ashwilliams4959 Ash, very good point mate, totally agree with you on that one.
@@ashwilliams4959you’re just pretending to not understand how football works 😂😂 get a grip you lunatic 😂😂
🙏🏿
100% a second yellow. Yes it ruined the game but if this was man city v southampton nobody would even be on about it. You can't give the ref any reason to give you a yellow when you're already on one, trossards mistake. BUT I will say he didn't dish out yellows when city kicked the ball away
He was passing to martinelli as soon as the whistle blew
Will has to be trolling
Mark was literally singing when arsenal scored. He's got no room to talk about bias 😂
You can favour one side while also being objective about the situation. It’s called integrity.
@@holdtightadele8017 having a rapist play in your midfield while constantly talking about City's 115 charges is an example of integrity
@@holdtightadele8017which he has none, he is fakest youtuber in football community so what's the point?
Mate, Arsenal haters like this muppet in the black hoodie don’t have a clue do they, get over your hate
It's very hypocritical to complain about injustice in the refereeing decisions yesterday without talking about how Arsenal got into the game because Michael Oliver allowed a quick take of the free kick 10 yards from the initial foul and having pulled Walker from his position.
I agree it's unfair that one team gets punished for an offence while the other team doesn't. But that doesn't take away the fact that Trossard still committed the offence. It's like complaining to a judge that you were caught stealing but the other perpetrator stole but didn't get caught, don't do the crime and you won't do the time. Simple!
Will mate, trossard kicked the ball 0.2 seconds after the whistle was blown… that’s not exaggerating, that’s factual. 0.2 seconds…. 0.2 you’re a muppet, what about haaland blowing through saliba? What about haaland throwing the ball at the back of gabi’s head? What about haaland plowing into partey after the equaliser? You absolute muppet
NFL & NBA have fixed matches.
I like Will but he's totally wrong. Arsenal were setup to counter, so obviously the millisecond Trossard gets the ball his aim is to look up and pass forward. It's like these joker refs think footballers have the reflexes of flies
Saying that trossard didn't boot it is so embarrassing, it was a back and forth game with both getting dodgey decisions but it was Defos a red
So you’re a muppet as well, he kicked it 0.26 seconds after the whistle was blown, I’d give you £5000 if you can go to boot a ball, I’ll blow the whistle and you have 0.26 seconds to stop your full power kick… and see how well that works.
Plus, silva and Doku both did the exact same thing well well after the whistle… nothing happened to them. 🤡
@@Wolf-1211how about win the ball clean, don't foul Silva in first place or don't kick the ball knowing that was a clear foul
@@RafaelSantos-di5yw yeah good advice, give it to city. None of you bots will ever admit that city committed way than double the fouls that Arsenal did, except whenever Arsenal slightly looked the wrong way, Oliver booked them yet haaland committed about what 4-5 serious fouls, man walked off the pitch with no card. Be quiet little one
@@Wolf-1211 selective reality! Ignoring the clear red card that you have no argument against which is why you completely ignored my argument and then waffling about Haaland? You're a certified yapper, constantly changing arguments to stuff that doesn't matter! What's next? You think Haaland should get whole season ban because he told Skelly "who tf are you?" Do yourself a favour and don't argue you div, literally none of what you said is relevant to my argument
Both of arsenal’s goals shouldn’t of counted either clearly blocking the goalkeeper and pulling the defender out of position to have a chat then allowing a quick restart so City would’ve still won
Look i’m trying to be as unbiased as possible here. Oliver had an absolute rotter for both teams, however i think the trossard yellow is the correct decision. First he elbows Silva in the back, which in some cases have been given a yellow, and then he kicks the ball away when Walker is going to get it wanting to take a quick free-kick. If you look back to when Silva and Doku kicked the ball away, no Arsenal player was intending to take a quick one so Oliver probably didn’t see it as a yellow card offense. All that being said however, i understand why fans are angry, the refs 1000% need to be more consistent
And a word on the added time. Only 7 mins I thought was a joke but, Arsenal players were down with ‘cramp’ which lasted 2 mins (90-92) so the ref was most likely instructed to play 2 extra minutes over the allotted time because thats the amount of time the arsenal players were down for.
Alas, Arsenal gave us a good test and we’ll see if this is a potential title deciding game.
Ruben Diaz using the actual elbow (and not the shoulder) didn't got a yellow for that. "Rules for me, but not for thee" eh.
"Cramp" all the players that went down were subbed off, and the goalkeeper was limping after. Rodri faking an injury 3 seconds into the game it's fine cause it's man city
Walker wasn't taking a quick free kick. In the frame where Trossard kicks it, the whistle is still in Oliver's mouth and Silva is on the ground. Walker was going to take a free kick with Silva still on the ground? While Arsenal already had ten men behind the ball?
Brilliant Mark keep doing what you are doing.... Dont Relent...
Mark its pure Man City hate.🤬🤬 You can break someones leg but don't sent him off, you're ruining the game.
Most obvious kick of the ball after the foul you’ll ever see, sorry Mark. Will is right.
A clear second yellow and people wanna complain lmao
No
Will is an employee of the PGMOL 😆 sack him.
Referee doesn’t ruin the game by correctly sending someone off. The player does. The refs job isn’t to be entertaining, it’s to enforce the rules
Mark thinks it's the WWE, the premise for football is not entertainment football is a sport people play football in grounds with no fans and no tv coverage but would you still call that entertainment. No it's a sport that is played competitively and the entertainment part comes with it. Just because your not entertained mark doesn't mean they have to cater to your needs hahaha but I know your ego won't like that fact.
Then why are there fans there? Why do fans complain when a team 'doesn't play attractive football'... get a grip on reality, my friend, it is Sport & Entertainment.
@@nhd6128entertainment is subjective, ask any Mourinho fan if they give a shit about entertaining football when he wins a trophy
Top man Mark 👏
A second yellow and sending a player off just isnt fair. A first yellow is fine but they need a different rule if already on a yellow, 5 minute sin bin or something like that. It's a stupid rule and refs should use common sense and try avoiding sending a player off due to a poor rule!
Why? Everyone knows that a second yellow means you get sent off. This isnt some brand new rule that they introduced yesterday. If you don't wanna get sent off for a second yellow then don't do something stupid whilst on a yellow card...
@ka5333 Never said it was a new rule but like every year they decide to enforce certain rules and the impact has been harsh in some instances. Like you said its not a new rule but to start sending people off this season is just ridiculous
Trossard should have received a yellow for the challenge alone deliberately and recklessly charged a player in the back never mind kicking the ball away
I absolutely agree with Will
Will is right on this one.
Clownbridge 🤡🤡🤡
He lost his argument at the doku one
Even contradicts himself saying ref pointed to the wrong place
Then why should doku get a card for following ref instructions then
These refs play a huge role, and it's always in city's favour
😂😂😂 yeah that’s why he gifted arsenals first goal
We always get told its inconsistent but they're 100% consistent in aiding city
@@ashwilliams4959 😂😂 ref literally was against city you mong
They aided the Arsenal goal. The outrage if he gifted City a goal
@francishammond9791 it's hilarious that city fans are so catered to by the refs that they've made an issue from something that happens to all other teams without a thought. It's only with city that the ref has to wait for them
black sweater's brain is turned off for this conversation. He clearly is attempting the pass to the outlet Martinelli, obvious to anyone who watches
Whinge whinge whinge always from the red teams it happens to all teams every week not just your lot but because other teams are not part of the so called big six it is ignored get over it and move on 😭😭😭😭
Everyone has been saying it for the past few years... obvious to everyone and their mother that the refs are on city's payroll..
Trossard knew what he was doing..
Not really, if you look back on it Trossard is ahead of the referee and doesn't know that the play stopped, he was trying to find the pass to Martinelli for the counter attack.
@@alexandermcbrien264 He should have known.
@@chypres89 he kicked the ball half a second after the whistle, what the fuck are you talking about?
@@VelicoFides Relax Arsenal fan. He only gets payed millions a week to do his job as a professional. yet he fails at one of the most simplest of things. Not my fault.
@@chypres89 as I suspected you have nothing of value to say
First