The Accuracy of the Gospels - Dr Bart Ehrman

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 13

  • @zahara6355
    @zahara6355 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    His books list all historical facts and documents. That info is taught at all bible colleges, all pastors know it, but no one telling the truth to their church.

  • @danmurphy988
    @danmurphy988 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Jesus can't be god. He had a god, Elah. And god never died nor was he born. People just follow blindy thinking their forefathers can't be wrong.

  • @scottmenzies2263
    @scottmenzies2263 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    the only evidence he claims to have is no evidence at all. This is all assumptions. The thing is he talks as if he is right and the bible is wrong but still without any evidence that he is right or the bible is wrong.

    • @cyberjayhd7051
      @cyberjayhd7051 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He clearly points out contradictions. Stop lying to yourself

    • @scottmenzies2263
      @scottmenzies2263 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@cyberjayhd7051 so what does a contradiction mean. It doesn't prove or disprove anything 2 people witness a car accident I can guarantee you they will have differing versions of what happened.

    • @cyberjayhd7051
      @cyberjayhd7051 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@scottmenzies2263 If the Gospels are contracting on Historical events they cannot be Historically accurate. That's the argument. It can be true. Jesus can be God. It doesn't matter. The fact is that the Gospels are NOT Historically accurate.

    • @scottmenzies2263
      @scottmenzies2263 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@cyberjayhd7051 What do you call accurate when it comes to events over 2000 years. Most people couldn't read or write back then but I do know the Papacy has evidence from records kept by the Romans that a man they labelled as the King of the Jews was crucified by them on the Jewish passover. Anyway why would 12 people get together to make up such a story when all they gained from it was persecution and death unlike Bart Eshram who has made considerably large amounts of wealth from his rather questionable claims, assumptions and point of view. Bart Eshram thinks Jesus came from the home of David which is incorrect Jesus came from the HOUSE OF DAVID meaning his Blood line, the same with Joseph and he's also incorrect about King Herod.

    • @scottmenzies2263
      @scottmenzies2263 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@cyberjayhd7051 I hope your going to be working over Christmas. Being a Godless Atheist and all even though Christmas only has a Christian flavour it's actually Pagan and Pagans have Gods as well. Don't be a hypocrite and have a holiday

  • @maryjocookson7156
    @maryjocookson7156 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    There is a book called "Evidence that demands a Verdict" BY Josh Mcdowell, its worth reading if you need real evidence for the authenticity of the gospels. You can split hairs till kingdom come, Jesus died to reconcile us to God, nobody has impacted history as he has, to get into debate does not ever achieve much other than confuse the real message of the Gospels.

    • @logicsetsyoufree9052
      @logicsetsyoufree9052 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      In a few hundred years no body will care about these myths