RARE F-117 Nighthawks at Duluth!!!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 265

  • @baero5
    @baero5 ปีที่แล้ว +119

    Such a legendary aircraft, it still amazes me every time I see one, it looks like a spaceship!

    • @JBBost
      @JBBost 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Except spaceships don't need aerodynamics

    • @ConjointVR
      @ConjointVR 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      if I Did not know of the NightHawk, and you told me Darth Vader Flew one of these, I'd believe it.@@JBBost

    • @saintuk70
      @saintuk70 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@JBBost and neither did the F-117 ;)

    • @MavHunter20XX
      @MavHunter20XX 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      was gonna say, what aerodynamics @@saintuk70

    • @oiesen2112
      @oiesen2112 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Looks like a flying tent😐

  • @kinch613
    @kinch613 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    Man that brings back memories. Love that theyre sporting the TR tailcodeand the Nighthawk . My days with the jet at TTR were some of my most cherished! And knowing that I worked on both of those 34 years ago is crazy. Keep em flying boys!

  • @wtfmimshag
    @wtfmimshag 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Incredible. I was a little kid simulating these in microprose's game in 1991. Now an old man and they still rip. What a legacy.

  • @paulmca8514
    @paulmca8514 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    Offically the F-117 fleet retired in 2009, but As of 2016, the retired fleet comprised over 50 airframes, with some of the aircraft being flown periodically.
    In March 2019, it was reported that four F-117s had been secretly deployed to the Middle East in 2016 and that one had to make an emergency landing at Ali Al Salem (OKAS), Kuwait
    64 (5 YF-117As, 59 F-117As) were built
    I remember seeing these on a visit outside of Nellis AFB in Nevada, they are every it as weird looking as they appear in photos or video, if that makes sense.
    I think it was 2002, sadly I didn`t have a digital camera then, but I got some great shots on 35mm film, they also sound odd, great looking machine.

    • @thezfunk
      @thezfunk 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I thought one of the defense bills from Congress required so many to be destroyed every year. I am not sure how they are defying that. Well, the Pentagon is supposed to pass an audit every year and we see how well that is enforced.

    • @paulmca8514
      @paulmca8514 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@thezfunk I don`t think they destroy them as such, but they are decomissioned , or mothballed if you prefer.
      Doubtless if look on Wiki something you will find more info.
      I doubt there is more than 10 airworthy at anytime, and they would need to keep flightcrew current on them as well.

    • @EliTheCryptoAndAiGuy
      @EliTheCryptoAndAiGuy 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Any clue why these ones are being flown? Does USAF just maintain a couple of these for fun or do you think these ones are also being deployed as you said in the Middle East?

    • @paulmca8514
      @paulmca8514 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@EliTheCryptoAndAiGuy Most of the aircraft have been moutballed/ put in storage, the story about a small number being sent to middle east was in a airforce magazine I subscribe to, I suspect they are based Saudi Arabia.
      The F-117 is a specialised aircraft, so the USAF would be keen to keep a pool of pilots qualified to operate them, should the need arise.
      It`s fairly standard in aviation you need to fly certain aircraft for a number of hours to keep your type rating on a particular aircraft, otherwise the skill set required could be compromised.
      It`s pretty certain that it is what we are seeing here, training flights, to keep aircrew, and groundcrew up to speed with operating the type.
      I hope this helps.

    • @dukeford
      @dukeford 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Probably down to around 40 airframes at this point. Several have been put on static display since 2016, and a couple have been scrapped.

  • @randygravel2057
    @randygravel2057 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Just love the hidden intake and especially the hidden exhaust

  • @barryrodgers3039
    @barryrodgers3039 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Makes me happy to still see these flying. Wish they had kept a few Tomcats airworthy as well.

    • @OGdoorstop
      @OGdoorstop 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Any of the ones you see in museums have their parts stored away and can be made airworthy in case of the sudden need for more aircraft.

    • @michiganmike7167
      @michiganmike7167 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@OGdoorstopI’ve heard , and I don’t know if this is true or not , all the museum f-14s had some kind of important hardware taken out , and instead of keeping that hardware, the government destroyed it all to keep it out of the Iranians hands

    • @slickstrings
      @slickstrings 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@OGdoorstop Incorrect, f14's in museums had all their gear stripped out and scrapped to stop black market supplies to iranian f14's. Even our australian f111's were required to be disposed of thoroughly to prevent the Tf30 parts making their way there.
      The problem with this idea of using old, retired aircraft in emergencies is there is far more than just spare parts required to keep them flying.
      All these modern fighters need special maintenance facilities and knowledge. Thats one of the reasons they are so expensive. The f111 for example needed cold proof testing facilities for the wings to identify fatigue cracks. The f14 would need its own diagnostic equipment etc that probably dont exist anymore, the training programs for maintenance workers doesnt exist anymore... when the aircraft type is retired it all gets taken out and the space is used for new types. You would not believe how much stuff there is for each jet type. Cabinets full of manuals, special jigs and engine stands, portable start carts which i doubt the navy use anymore since the hornet and f35 have apu's...
      i dont think the f14s missiles even exist anymore. the f14 has sparrows and old aim 9ms. the navy uses AMRAAM and aim-9x which the tomcats were never upgraded to use.
      There is no chance an f14 will fly again.

    • @AtheistOrphan
      @AtheistOrphan 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Iranian Air Force still has quite a few operational Tomcats. Great aircraft.

    • @anotherHelldiver
      @anotherHelldiver 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@AtheistOrphan "Quite a few" I'd say maybe 20. Which is still more than the entire Russian Su-57 Fleet.

  • @phillipdavis3316
    @phillipdavis3316 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Wobbly Gobblins!

  • @mt5144
    @mt5144 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    These F-117's are an amazing Aircraft, always remember them coming to the UK Airshows at RIAT England the last time was in 2007 When a Pair arrived for the weekends show, Love to see them again in action especially with the TR Tail Codes.

  • @g2145cal
    @g2145cal 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    this video made my day...i was in the Air Force as a jet engine mechanic and often i would volunteer to fill in for a crew chief on our KC-10's. one of my TDY's was taking 3 of these from Nellis to Andrews in june of 1991 for the National Victory Celebration Parade flyover. I have pics of refueling these several times as we went...very awesome

  • @redtopodom5790
    @redtopodom5790 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    Such an amazing video. The super close taxi shots are awesome 🔥🔥

    • @BlueRockerPR
      @BlueRockerPR  ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Thank you very much, was hoping I could get those close-ups.

    • @jesphillips2193
      @jesphillips2193 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@BlueRockerPR FBI, OPEN UP! lol

  • @danburkland
    @danburkland 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    One of my all time favorite aircraft!

  • @johnzillah
    @johnzillah 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I seen one of these in the 80's taking off at the Myrtle Beach SC airport. I had the T-tops out cruising in my 86 Mustang GT. When I seen this thing come off the runway I about ran off the road. It is such a cool plane!

  • @craiglizt8074
    @craiglizt8074 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Very cool. I'd see these flying near Edwards AFB when I was growing up. So cool to see them flying again post "retirement."

  • @spencerthu2956
    @spencerthu2956 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Idc I love this design. For me it looks like a space fighter. From the side back and bottom they look so cool

  • @billirvin9057
    @billirvin9057 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I was in the Senior Trend program from Mar 86 until I retired in Nov 1989. Thanks for bringing back an old memory. When I retired, I was presented with a flag that Col Tolin took on the first daylight flight.

  • @globalwillh
    @globalwillh 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Wow Nice!! Speaks to the F117's longevity. To get a quick peak behind the curtain would be something out of this world. The NGAD is likely flying already. American innovation and airpower are unmatched.

  • @ChrisVanMiddelkoop
    @ChrisVanMiddelkoop 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I think it is so cool seeing these old planes fly again

    • @SEO122
      @SEO122 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      They never stopped flying. Their retirement was a façade.

  • @ethantaylor5001
    @ethantaylor5001 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Saw one at Patrick Henry/Williamsburg-Newport News airport back around 2007, strange that they would be there with Langley AFB just a few miles away. I also saw some Blue Angels at Richmond.

  • @johnblizard
    @johnblizard 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Great video. Its been a long time. As an F-117A maintainer from 1982 until 1988, i love these videos.

  • @McRocket
    @McRocket 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great job of filming, imho.
    Thanlk you.

  • @urdnal
    @urdnal 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

    I like that their angular shape is an artifact of the limited computing power calculating their radar cross section when they were designed. Like early 3D games/sims, low-poly physically manifested.
    Ed. This may be wrong, I can't remember where I read it. I don't like spreading misinformation, but I'll leave it up because it's an interesting concept if true.

    • @Anubis78250
      @Anubis78250 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Coatings were not as advanced in the early days, their stealth is primarily based on their geometry. With new coatings these are actually more stealthy than the modern iterations. It's actually why you see them still around here and there today despite having severely limited capabilities.

    • @Aeronaut1975
      @Aeronaut1975 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Essentially, yes, you are absolutely correct. That IS the reason why.

    • @PurpleDreki
      @PurpleDreki 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Pure speculation by you. You play too many video games.

    • @waterlife.1905
      @waterlife.1905 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Speculation at its best though. Makes so much sense. Interesting. Might be on to something.

    • @urdnal
      @urdnal 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@PurpleDreki I swear I read this somewhere legitimate, I just can't remember where.

  • @d3ath8ybac0n4
    @d3ath8ybac0n4 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    The plane that shocked the world in the Gulf War. I remember as a kid watching CNN during the initial air strikes in disbelief that this plane was real. At that time our airbase had F4's and F-15's, and on rare occasions an SR-71 would land.

    • @egooidios5061
      @egooidios5061 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Those who have seen a flying SR-71 up close, deserve special honor!!

  • @shelleibach20
    @shelleibach20 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great catch...Dont see many of them on this site...tks much

  • @SlipFitGarage
    @SlipFitGarage 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This video is 4 months old at the time of this comment.... so I am sure the 117's are no longer stationed in Duluth...... I wish I would've seen this video sooner. I could have easily been in Duluth during the time they were there. That would be AWESOME to see a 117 in person, and actually flying in 2023. Not bad for an aircraft that's been "retired" for 15+ years. lolol. Great video.... and it's in 4K60, too! Thanks.

    • @bigboots6114
      @bigboots6114 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      when i was in the military i got to see one on the flight line and it was amazing to think it could fly

  • @jpatt1000
    @jpatt1000 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I do hope the air force will do one last round of air show visits with the Nighthawk before it's put to be for good. Would love to see it at EAA one last time. (I did go to western Wisconsin in the hopes of catching one in the air in the Volk MOA, but no joy.)

  • @columnedfox5508
    @columnedfox5508 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    some people may have thought the Nighthawk was retired in 2008, but as of 2010 more F-117 spotting's became more frequent, so they was placed on a status where they could be re-called back into service when needed...

    • @SimonEdwards-f6j
      @SimonEdwards-f6j 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The reason the F-117s have been more active is because they are low-observable and this has training value for F-22 and other pilots. The F-117, however, is not comparable, in terms of signature, to late-model Russian and Chinese stealth fighters, which are much more advanced than the 1979 F-117. The actual motive for this activity, which is concentrated at Tonopah, is to aid in the testing of the new helical EM radars which can cut through radar absorbent material and is largely agnostic to the angular facets of the F-117. It is not, as many have speculated, related to training pilots to get used to seeing low-observable aircraft, but is rather for testing the helical EM radars which are borderline experimental.
      For those who are uninitiated, helical EM is capable of penetrating materials that would ordinarily immediately reflect EM. In the case of a piece of metal at a 45-degree angle, rather than bouncing at that angle, the beam's angular momentum is simply inverted (or at least part of its energy is) so that a RADAR return can still be generated. This is possible because of the magnetic self-reinforcement of photons in the helical EM, which means that solids, liquids, and atmosphere have less ability to scatter or redirect this form of electromagnetism. For visible light LASERs, this means an unprecedented ability to deliver focused energy to incoming missiles, but for RADAR band, it means the ability to get detectable returns from aircraft such as F-117. The technology doesn't work so well against platforms like F-22 which featuring overlapping variable-spacing copper meshes, but should work well against platforms like F-35 which use high-temperature low-density ionized plasmas in the skin. F-35 would be lit up like a Christmas tree by the helical EM RADARs.

    • @danielh1708
      @danielh1708 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Some people would be correct. They remain fully retired from the combat component into the status the Air Force placed them in at the time. Flyable storage. Its no surprise they're using them for training/test still.

  • @drmarkintexas-400
    @drmarkintexas-400 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you to Lt. Col. Ken Dyson for being one of the test pilots for the Have Blue or this plane would not have been possible. 🙏⭐🎖️🎖️🎖️

  • @atreyuprincipalh4043
    @atreyuprincipalh4043 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow what superb video

  • @fgm1197
    @fgm1197 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It's amazing that such a geometric nightmare even flies.

  • @vladpootin5973
    @vladpootin5973 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    These magnificent machines look like they are from a distant feature still…..
    🇺🇸🫡

  • @sirswerve2493
    @sirswerve2493 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Its funny when you look back and think I use to think these where like clear and couldn't see them. My mom had us thinking that the stealth tech worked like that. That's my mom.

  • @lukaspuente5765
    @lukaspuente5765 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You going to William tell in Savannah sept-11-15 ?

  • @dougsydnes8047
    @dougsydnes8047 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Such a cool sight to see. I'm amazed they can even fly given their shape just AMAZING!

  • @erik198
    @erik198 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Such a rad plane. And what a well done catch of them doing their thing 🙌

  • @Epicaviation47
    @Epicaviation47 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Epic video broo

  • @nathanfisher1826
    @nathanfisher1826 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    These babies are upgraded

  • @SirScottland
    @SirScottland 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Awesome video! My buddy is a controller there and you totally got him talking to them!! Heck yeah!

    • @BlueRockerPR
      @BlueRockerPR  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you very much! Glad your buddy got to hear himself talk to them, those are bragging rights right there!

  • @atthefence111
    @atthefence111 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Awesome video dude!! Happy you were able to catch these guys up there!!

    • @BlueRockerPR
      @BlueRockerPR  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks dude! Really glad I was able to get some good shots of them.

  • @footix72
    @footix72 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Incredible !

    • @BlueRockerPR
      @BlueRockerPR  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks for watching!

  • @KRITORISS
    @KRITORISS 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Testing upgrades for future fighters

  • @barrycoomer8137
    @barrycoomer8137 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Outstanding ! 👏👏👏

  • @toadelevator
    @toadelevator 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What a fine video! I especially like the break for landing.

  • @bobzuidema3560
    @bobzuidema3560 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Amazing aircraft, it looks like it's not supposed to fly but it does anyway.

  • @Skywatchersx
    @Skywatchersx 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That’s probably the coolest looking retired plane to date!!!! One that we would know about anyway. lol

  • @Cinemashow78
    @Cinemashow78 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I knew it! I saw a group of 2 F-117s fly overhead in Bigfork Minnesota. I’m guessing that they were coming from Duluth heading to an AFB in North Dakota. So cool !! Woulda been summer 2023

  • @bwest6275
    @bwest6275 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    ‘Murica F’ YEaahhh!!!! 🇺🇸

  • @magicman08
    @magicman08 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Well done!

  • @dhomasdjeffersson
    @dhomasdjeffersson ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Absolutely fantastic video, well done!

  • @vaughnbluejr5960
    @vaughnbluejr5960 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wasn't this the plane that was used in Operation Desert Storm (Persian Gulf War) in 1991?

  • @chrisgmelch1479
    @chrisgmelch1479 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wow! Have Blue...

  • @bagoistvan3182
    @bagoistvan3182 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi. Is this video recently taken ? I was under the impression that the 117 is retired to the desert storage together with the BlackBird.....🤔🤔🤔

  • @iceman_fox1
    @iceman_fox1 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Man I would love to use this footage somehow on my channel...

  • @bigtex4790
    @bigtex4790 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Still one of the coolest planes ever built!

  • @WorksOnMyComputer
    @WorksOnMyComputer 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fantastic footage.

    • @BlueRockerPR
      @BlueRockerPR  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you very much!

  • @Manny32V
    @Manny32V 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    awesome video. what is the heat thats coming off right behind the cockpit? apu?

    • @BlueRockerPR
      @BlueRockerPR  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Quite possibly the APU. Thanks for watching!

  • @gregertman6497
    @gregertman6497 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The TR tail designation . Interesting

    • @BloodhoundVX30
      @BloodhoundVX30 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I believe that tailcode is for Tonopah Test Range (TTR).

  • @aliensporebomb
    @aliensporebomb ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Absolutely fantastic video!

  • @deniscortes9200
    @deniscortes9200 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    WHAT A WARBIRD!, JUST LOVE IT.

  • @Bsquaredplus2
    @Bsquaredplus2 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    SR-71, BONE, F-117, three of the most ba planes ever

  • @TASTEGROUND
    @TASTEGROUND 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    youre so lucky

  • @32tfs
    @32tfs ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Wow great catches there and an excellent video 👍

  • @paulbennett8516
    @paulbennett8516 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Another excellent video a superb aircraft great catch👍🏻👍🏻

  • @andreasgroeller1083
    @andreasgroeller1083 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome. ❤

  • @jouhannaudjeanfrancois891
    @jouhannaudjeanfrancois891 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fly high Duluth!

  • @NovusDundus
    @NovusDundus 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'll never unsee them looking like tiny birds with their tails up mid glide

  • @Dutchie66
    @Dutchie66 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Are they based at DLH? Would love to see them. Last time was in 1993 in Holland.

  • @ams1500
    @ams1500 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    These guys have been doing almost daily flyovers/landing approaches over my house. Much louder than the usual F-16s.

    • @shawnomack45
      @shawnomack45 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      F117s are not louder than f16s. They don't have a afterburner. Have seen them multiple times at airshows.

    • @ColonelJohnmatrix1000
      @ColonelJohnmatrix1000 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Not true. Spend a lot time involved with both.

    • @jacob1423
      @jacob1423 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      f16 is way louder

    • @ams1500
      @ams1500 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      to @@shawnomack45 and the rest of you - on those days in the summer, in the same tandem formation at landing approach speeds, the F-117s were louder than the usual MN ANG F-16s

    • @Chris11249
      @Chris11249 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Makes sense on them being very loud, they're pushing out a lot of thrust through narrow flat exhausts. But an F-16 in afterburner is louder, but without the F-117 is louder.

  • @DJAYPAZ
    @DJAYPAZ 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    The not so retired F117 maybe has a new role.

    • @ItsMeMikey998
      @ItsMeMikey998 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Heard it’s in testing to be put back into service use

  • @misterx8592
    @misterx8592 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The “Wobbly Goblin” is still flying!

  • @JK-td4hi
    @JK-td4hi 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When the Soviets learned of its existence, it was like rubbing salt in an open wound for them. Not only had the USSR just collapsed, but they learned they never stood a chance again the US had an actual war broken out. This stealth fighter proved the US was decades ahead of them.

  • @lacosanostra20
    @lacosanostra20 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Duluth Minnesota?

  • @paulhathaway578
    @paulhathaway578 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So cool

  • @DelsquarePhotovideo
    @DelsquarePhotovideo ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Dude, 2:47 is the money shot

  • @jonbolen7169
    @jonbolen7169 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    beautiful

  • @Pico_444
    @Pico_444 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Cybertruck of the sky

  • @project182r3
    @project182r3 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I thought these were decommissioned now?

  • @allenmoses110
    @allenmoses110 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The cyber truck airplane, before there ever was a cyber truck!

  • @Sp1n3c
    @Sp1n3c 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What better way to make something secret than reveal it, operate , decommission it and excelerate the development

    • @bigboots6114
      @bigboots6114 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      i would bet they have been upgraded to the new tech to test it out for future stealth

  • @TrippyNoodles
    @TrippyNoodles 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks. Great footage 😎

    • @BlueRockerPR
      @BlueRockerPR  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for watching!

  • @btaylo24
    @btaylo24 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wow! Good catch!

  • @VictoriaWargaming
    @VictoriaWargaming 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I thought they had been retired? being brought out again?

  • @JustReed
    @JustReed ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love my country America!

  • @boondockduane
    @boondockduane 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The Tonopah Twins. We had them training with our 144th Fighter Wing two years back. They have been training all over. Let’s just say “Chinese Cruise Missiles” F-117 still a stealthy little beast. What’s funny is it looks small but is larger than a F-15
    Fresno footage from two years ago
    th-cam.com/video/X8f4r7L691o/w-d-xo.htmlsi=olp4R0BVkCMHM9Wl

  • @NoteSmoking
    @NoteSmoking ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This looks like a plane watchers dream video.

    • @BlueRockerPR
      @BlueRockerPR  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It sure was for me, thanks for watching!

  • @calypso2niner
    @calypso2niner 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Not so retired, indeed. Lookin' good to me.

  • @DigitalNomadOnFIRE
    @DigitalNomadOnFIRE 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Still look more futuristic than anything fighting today

  • @haunter_1845
    @haunter_1845 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I would jump out of my seat if I saw an F-117 out the window at a commercial airport. You can see that one of these F-117s have Luneburg lenses attached over the wings allowing it to be visible on radar. I'm not sure why the other one doesn't have them equipped.

  • @BrokenWrenches
    @BrokenWrenches 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    that’s awesome. really cool seeing those retired aircraft still doing the thing. hopefully the usaf will put them on the airshow circuit before real retirement.

  • @scotsmanofnewengland7713
    @scotsmanofnewengland7713 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Where is this Duluth ?

  • @tombeck2792
    @tombeck2792 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It sounds like a DC-9

  • @bagoistvan3182
    @bagoistvan3182 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    8:30...👍🍺🍺🍺🍺🍺😁😁😁

  • @AlexerclexerAlexer-oh6er
    @AlexerclexerAlexer-oh6er 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Like F- 117

  • @adam9315
    @adam9315 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Amazing design. Considering that it defies the laws of aerodynamics. F-117A has no right to fly. This shows what computer control means, flight by wire. Greetings from Poland.

  • @timw483
    @timw483 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Looks like they completely removed the tail numbers. Pity, I wonder if one of them is my old jet. DAMN I miss working on those things!

  • @aaronmiller5012
    @aaronmiller5012 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I thought they were retired!

  • @kilosierra6763
    @kilosierra6763 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Am I blind or are there No tail numbers?

  • @bradcasstevens5626
    @bradcasstevens5626 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Don’t understand why they retired that plane. It’s an amazing piece of equipment!!

  • @kevinsavard5998
    @kevinsavard5998 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    They are weird looking for sure. They are "retired" however other places I have seen they used them for testing new radars and other flight components. However they are sometimes doing some missions we won't here about I'm sure. They also fly them to keep them from degrading.

  • @biscuit4836
    @biscuit4836 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Where do you go to get these videos? I’ve been trying to find a good place to watch but I’ve just been settling with watching from by the cirrus buildings

  • @mosshark
    @mosshark 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So this thing can still drop bombs on the bad guys?

    • @bigboots6114
      @bigboots6114 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      if need be yes