Woman Sells Ring Gifted by Her Ex - Then Jeweller Tells Her : "You're not Supposed To Have This"
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 มิ.ย. 2024
- With a heavy heart, she walked into a renowned jewellers shop, hoping to part with the ring and maybe get some money in return.
As the jeweller took a closer look, his eyes widened in disbelief.
Join Our Family For More Exclusive Content and Perks :
/ @duk
You Can Also Watch:
-Man Walks 20 Miles To Work Until One Day Cop Follows Him And Sees Why
• Man Walks 20 Miles To ...
#did_you_know #viral_stories #wonderbot
If someone says to you, you’re not under arrest don’t go to the police station
Exactly. If he wants to question her, do it at the shop.
Did she have a choice? I'm asking bc I don't know. Wait.. I guess so based on cop dramas "Am I under arrest? Am I free to leave?" And the interrogators say no arrest, you can go. "But dont go out of toewwn! 💪" 😂
Exactly
@@C.Church you have rights under the US constitution
@@sheilalindauer248 That doesn't answer my question.
You never ever let any jeweller walk away with your item unless its fully documented
CORRECT! NEVER LET JEWELRY LEAVE YOUR SIGHT!!
i know i may sound a bit thick being from the UK but according to the story the cop says "if you can prove you haven't done anything wrong" surely it is up to the police to prove you have done something wrong.
This is the USA. (From Australia.) Even there, innocent until proven guilty.
Yes. There are a couple of procedural errors in the story.
I know of a case where a woman wanted to sell a diamond ring her X-Husband gave to her. He told her it was a 2 Karat diamond. She found out it was a 2 Karat Zircon worth a lot less than an actual 2 Karat Diamond of the same looking purity and clarity. The breakup with her X was because he cheated on her with her sister. She found out he even cheated her with the ring.
Thought it was innocent until proven guilty.🤔
That was the original idea, now, not so much.
So, the officer asks: "How did you get this ring?" Really? Inspector Clouseau at his finest.
Why do these story drag on and on, half of it is rubbish
Boy have you got it right
Ill take idiotic stories that never happened for $200 alex
😆😂
Here's the dead giveaway; they never told us what made this ring historically significant, or who it had once belonged to. Why would that important and interesting information have been left out of the story?
Opening words of the arresting police officer: "... can prove your innocence ..."
Since when is it up to the defendant to prove his innocence? In a correctly functioning judicial system, it is the job of the public attorney, aided by the police, to prove the defendants guilt, while always taking all evidence into consideration, that point towards his innocence.
The police officer should be seriously reprimanded for his attempt to unduly pressuring the arrestee.
And, if the defendant is forced accompany the officer to the station, it is an arrest.
She should have insisted on either a warrant or a formal summons for questioning.
"... can prove your innocence ..." < yes, I noticed that as well.
If they don't Mirandize you but force you to accompany them, then you have lawful grounds for a lawsuit. Also in a case like this, the police behavior is very aggressive. I wouldn't accompany them unless I had my attorney present. Remember that it's legal for the police to lie to you and do a number of aggressive things during questioning in order to trip you into confessing. They are NOT always the good guys and will try to make you believe that "lawyering up" is a sign of guilt. Nope, just good common sense. Also if you do choose to go voluntarily, insist on recording everything with your smartphone. They may try to resist that but just ask what they have to hide.
@@laurenrose2895 And about recording, it's not like they won't be recording you themselves.
"In a correctly function judicial system." That was the original idea, now, not so much.
Innocent till proven guilty that’s how it works. Not guilty till proven innocent.
The probability of her walking into a high end jewellery store that knew there was a problem with who owned the ring is off the charts. Common on, write your stories with a little research.
IF this story is true, it would make sense that high-end jewelry stores would BOLO for certain stolen property.
If she can PROVE, what country are we in!
I'd like to know a few things - how did this theft occur at THE Met?
And exactly what IS the "historical" significance of this ARTIFACT?
Questions ... questions ...
A good bench jeweler can remove a diamond and replace it with a CZ in less than 45 seconds if the stone is mounted in a tiffany setting as first illustrated in this presentation.
eight and a quarter minutes that could have been told in two.
One
Steve is screwed
She should have decently returned it to her boy friend.
Tell that cop where to go !!!!!!
You are Innocent until proven guilty When did this twist around!!
Actually, he could have asked for the ring back when they broke up. In most states an engagement ring only becomes the “property” of the woman after the wedding. It is considered a conditional gift and remains the property of the giver until the marriage contract is signed !
It was never stated that it was an engagement ring, just a gift.
Actually (perhaps in certain states?) ownership of a ring is dependent on the circumstances of the breakup. If the woman initiated the split, she has to give back the ring, although if she dumps him because of his infidelity that may be different. If the man decides on the breakup, then the woman can keep the ring. As I said, this may differ from state to state.
I kept my 1 Diamond because it was a Birthday Present and if I gave it back all I woulda gotten was a Plastic bunch of Roses and a Roasting Pan. As you can tell his Theme was the Letter R like Sesame Street. I still wear that Ring and found an Exact ring only Bigger at a Pawn Shop for 400. My Original Smaller ring was 2700.00 New Imagine the price of the second one I found and I only paid 400.
If the man breaks off the engagement the ring is hers.
@@alittlewheiser521 Actually, no.
What is with "you have to prove you didnt do
anything so you don't be arrested "
Awesome🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
Take ring to another jeweler.
Are you awake?
Lots of men and women are the same, its not just men
Wrong‼️ THEY need proof of guilt, it’s next to impossible to prove your innocence.💜👿
First of all I wouldn't trust anyone to just walk off with my ring not knowing where he is going with it or what he is doing with it!
Heard this exact story on another YT or some video. Copied!
How does a person prove that they haven't done anything wrong?
That's not what she said! She said "So you'll help me get revenge?".
Entertaining little short story. I would advise the author to change the scene in which the police come for Melissa. The statement that she must prove her innocence to them isn't right. There is such a thing as presumption of innocence and saying something like that could cause problems if the matter went to trial. I also believe that they would have let the recorded conversation go on longer to see if they could get more information. And finally, there is no reason to burst in to arrest him. Just signal her to leave and arrest the guy in the parking lot nice and easy.
Tripe.
U r obsessed with her... S t o p...let it go its not healthy u can do it and have a happier life
The pictures aren't remotely relevant to the story.
Dumb!
You tried, and tried to manage a longer video...
These stories are so dumb it takes forever to get to the point
3:20 min
Really?
Boring.
is that it???? what a weak video!! this sounds like a mills and boon gone wrong..
That ring was NOT her property anymore...had she been a person of integrity she wouldn't have found herself in that situation...
I hate her ex
It’s just a story, you get that right?