SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE VIDEOS: th-cam.com/channels/LkN9aa7m2J4PKtSTs4DrlQ.html MORE RECREATIONS: Charles Ii of Spain recreated in real life: th-cam.com/video/36hM5bfLCI8/w-d-xo.html Is Keith Habersberger from the Try Guys a Habsburg?: Louis XIV in Real Life: th-cam.com/video/TXZkXW5DL54/w-d-xo.html Phillippe duc d'Orleans in Real Life: th-cam.com/video/I_xOakfoagw/w-d-xo.html King Tut's INbred Family Tree: th-cam.com/video/LU_6F6ZQMGA/w-d-xo.html The Whittakers Inbred Family Tree: th-cam.com/video/cwCJ0kuoyxo/w-d-xo.html Leopold I: The Habsburg Jawed Glamour Boy in All His Handsomeness: th-cam.com/video/fR6H0nk-YUw/w-d-xo.html
These three are some of the only royalty for whom I have any sympathy. The women did have any choice, especially Marie, and Carlos absolutely didn't ask to be born as he was.
Marie Louise died too young. I know most royal members' lives were full of comfort and privilege but still, poor woman, couldn't enjoy her life at all.
Such a cool channel! In these paintings, We only see what the royals wanted us to see. I can imagine being a portrait painter for them was an extremely stressful job!
I’m surprised that the second wife, having known the history of the first wife didn’t… well… get herself pregnant by another man after a couple years of unsuccessful efforts. Surely back then there would be no proof that she’d been disloyal provided nobody witnessed the deed. You can’t tell me a young stable boy or someone like that couldn’t have been bribed to discreetly provide what her husband could not.
Ie King Henry the VIII Not only so many unsuccessful pregnancies but he only had 2 daughters live also Barren. I wonder if there was a bigger health issue
@@eburel506 Oh I know, Lately I have seen a theory Henry was Kell positive. At the moment I can't recall if any of Henry's other wives were related to him. It's a given he never "bed" Anne of Cleves. He never got Catherine Howard or Katherine Parr pregnant
You’re saying that medical evidence is propaganda? You know something you can present scientific proof of a claim with? Were your parents related to each other too?
@@bennu547coroners can be paid off in any time period, my brother. "Medical evidencd" is only as reliable as the author and circumstance like any other source of information.
@@erdood3235 exactly 😂 Schools need to teach how to critically think about and question the sources of info they receive... but then the people funding the schools might be questioned and we can't have that. But that's another debate altogether lol
If Mortal Faces wants a challenge, he can try to find out my family tree. My mother's side is from Spain and my father's side is from Iraq (they never used last names until they immigrated to the US 40 years ago) and my father's side are indigenous people so they have 9000 years of history in the region. lol
Its puzzling why Charles II was not declared unfit to rule, whereas Juana of Castille (Catherine of Aragon's sister) was when Philip of Burgundy her husband and co-ruler died. I think a possible reason is that the Spanish wouldnt have wanted Charles's sister Marie Theresa to become Queen because she was married to Louis XIV of France, and anyway, her claim to the throne of Spain was supposed to have been surrendered under the 1659 Treaty of the Pyrenees between France and Spain. The failure of Spain to pay the massive dowry became an excuse by Louis XIV to invade the Spanish Netherlands as his wife's inheritance. Charles II had an illegitimate halg brother John of Austria who was a fairly successful soldier in the Thirty Years War but he was at odds with the Queen Mother Mariana Victoria, who probably wanted to rule through her incompetent son, Charles II.
That is because he was fit to rule. I would like to inform you that every negative thing you learned about Charles is Bourbon propaganda that Philip of Anjou made. Because they want to make himself look good so that the Spanish people will take his side. It is sad to think of it because Charles gave him the throne because he was his half sister's grandson and he is the only one who can unite the empire. Most videos about him did not explain his good contributions as a monarch just talk about the inbred stuff and the Eugenia bullying story. I would like to remind you that this is the 1600's it is a different time period that does not accept anyone who is disabled. He himself faces scrutiny just because of his jaw. about him and reads books about him. By the way every royal family back then is a wreath so he is not the only one to perform this. Why do people act as if it was his fault. It is sad that little was discussed about his personality and resiliency. He was a nice man who was deeply patriotic who defended his nation from France at the time. France was always waging war on him and tried taking his throne. The incompetent description of Charles is false as I read books and videos on TH-cam where Spanish historians talk about him. He fixed the problems he inherited from his father. Imposed laws protecting natives ( It is true Spanish documents confirmed this) I was surprised when I found out. He was described to be a good musician who can play the clavichord, loves hunting especially in colder months, and he can dance. Charles is not so useless as history portrays him. He is just a victim of Bourbon propaganda and modern bullying is ironic for people calling out Charles for bullying Eugenia yet they bully Charles too. The level of hypocrisy is just unbelievable. Bullying still exists in this century and it is sad Eugenia deserves better literally the village treated her like garbage who tried to trespass at her house to just laugh at her at least in the palace she gets respected at the end. No one deserves to experience that not even Charles II. By the way Eugenia's nude painting is meant to symbolize a goddess and it is a tremendous honor at the time. To Spain he is not their worst king one of the best and it is sad that Bourbon propaganda brainwashed people into believing such myths. I am simply defending him because people need to learn the truth about him.
About his mother Mariana of Austria. She was not as incompetent as history always painted her to be. She was incredibly smart and tried her best with the situation she was given. She faced challenges like the war of devoIution where Louis XIV tried to take Spain. Mariana of course had to defend her and her son's position. She succeeded in defeating Louis. Made peace negotiations but overtime she was getting unpopular because she wanted to extend her regency. Another reason is because her priminister Valenzuela was not liked. After her downfall and exile she still wrote to Charles and 3 years later she returned to Court even with limited influence she still managed to run the empire efficiently. I recommend reading Queen Mother stateswoman by Silvia Mitchell.
Poor Charles, he had a miserable and painful life. Had a good heart and have one of the best love stories in history. He loved Marie Louise and gave her support and comfort dsspite her stress and grief. He was the only joy Marie Louise had. She also learned to love Charles and treated him motherly. Which Charles liked. His second wife was the opposite she was ambitious, cold and harsh. She was only nice to Charles when she needed something. Which lead him to distrust her completely. Charles tried his best with his second wife yet she disliked him and judged him for his apperance. Charles not as bad of a king, as history writes him, he was a victim of propaganda trying to exagerate how bad he was, even though a good king of spain. His bullying toward eugenia was terrible but at his time is completely normal and he doesn't know it wrong because his ancestors and the entire court was doing it. It is also sad this man is only known for inbreeding and is ugly apperance. Some poeple just love to make fun of him without knowing more about him. 😢😢
@@spider-internet9782 I would like to first inform you that every negative thing you learned about Charles is Bourbon propaganda that Philip of Anjou made. Because they want to make himself look good so that the Spanish people will take his side. It is sad to think of it because Charles gave him the throne because he was his half sister's grandson and he is the only one who can unite the empire. Most videos about him did not explain his good contributions as a monarch just talk about the inbred stuff and the Eugenia bullying story. I would like to remind you that this is the 1600's it is a different time period that does not accept anyone who is disabled. He himself faces scrutiny just because of his jaw. about him and reads books about him. By the way every royal family back then is a wreath so he is not the only one to perform this. Why do people act as if it was his fault. It is sad that little was discussed about his personality and resiliency. He was a nice man who was deeply patriotic who defended his nation from France at the time. France was always waging war on him and tried taking his throne. The incompetent description of Charles is false as I read books and videos on TH-cam where Spanish historians talk about him. He fixed the problems he inherited from his father. Imposed laws protecting natives ( It is true Spanish documents confirmed this) I was surprised when I found out. He was described to be a good musician who can play the clavichord, loves hunting especially in colder months, and he can dance. Charles is not so useless as history portrays him. He is just a victim of Bourbon propaganda and modern bullying is ironic for people calling out Charles for bullying Eugenia yet they bully Charles too. The level of hypocrisy is just unbelievable. Bullying still exists in this century and it is sad Eugenia deserves better literally the village treated her like garbage who tried to trespass at her house to just laugh at her at least in the palace she gets respected at the end. No one deserves to experience that not even Charles II. By the way Eugenia's nude painting is meant to symbolize a goddess and it is a tremendous honor at the time. To Spain he is not their worst king one of the best and it is sad that Bourbon propaganda brainwashed people into believing such myths. The fact that you just comment and make fun of people is beyond him. I am defending him because people need to learn the truth about him.
I know a female who is fighting for the right to have sex with her cousin , im waiting for her , to get pregnant and see how they will handle it. Also i want how she would look pregnant
She'll look the same as if pregnant from someone else. That obsession against marrying cousins is an American thing, in Europe and the Middle East was quite common. If it's once in a few generations it won't be very significative, unless highly damaging recessive genes run in the family. My grandparents were 1st degree cousins, my mother was perfectly normal. Died at 72 because she quitted wanting to live, but had no health issues whatsoever.
SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE VIDEOS: th-cam.com/channels/LkN9aa7m2J4PKtSTs4DrlQ.html
MORE RECREATIONS:
Charles Ii of Spain recreated in real life: th-cam.com/video/36hM5bfLCI8/w-d-xo.html
Is Keith Habersberger from the Try Guys a Habsburg?:
Louis XIV in Real Life: th-cam.com/video/TXZkXW5DL54/w-d-xo.html
Phillippe duc d'Orleans in Real Life: th-cam.com/video/I_xOakfoagw/w-d-xo.html
King Tut's INbred Family Tree: th-cam.com/video/LU_6F6ZQMGA/w-d-xo.html
The Whittakers Inbred Family Tree: th-cam.com/video/cwCJ0kuoyxo/w-d-xo.html
Leopold I: The Habsburg Jawed Glamour Boy in All His Handsomeness: th-cam.com/video/fR6H0nk-YUw/w-d-xo.html
how did they even… complete the process with him gosh i feel sorry for them that’s miserable 😭
As if they had any choice, they probably were just as disgusted as you but were raised & brought up for one purpose.
Blow them candles out!
@@orangemanok5800apparently he could barely even get it up and it was painful for him 😕😕😕 I just assume it was a stinky mess in that bed
@@BlackRose-rp7kv 🤢
They women just have to wait for him to finish.they don't have to do anything
2:41 The reason why nothing “popped out”, was probably due to the fact that “nothing popped in”?
Oh, dear 🫣
These three are some of the only royalty for whom I have any sympathy. The women did have any choice, especially Marie, and Carlos absolutely didn't ask to be born as he was.
Marie Louise died too young. I know most royal members' lives were full of comfort and privilege but still, poor woman, couldn't enjoy her life at all.
I love how this channel drags the Habsburgs.
just facts. lol
Such a cool channel! In these paintings, We only see what the royals wanted us to see. I can imagine being a portrait painter for them was an extremely stressful job!
I’m surprised that the second wife, having known the history of the first wife didn’t… well… get herself pregnant by another man after a couple years of unsuccessful efforts. Surely back then there would be no proof that she’d been disloyal provided nobody witnessed the deed.
You can’t tell me a young stable boy or someone like that couldn’t have been bribed to discreetly provide what her husband could not.
Wasn’t Charles II of Spain impotent, though?
Amongst other things lol.
Yeah but unfortunately back then woman were blamed for not being able to have kids.
Ie King Henry the VIII
Not only so many unsuccessful pregnancies but he only had 2 daughters live also Barren.
I wonder if there was a bigger health issue
@@stephaniehowe0973 well inbreeding can cause higher infant deaths, miscarriages, stillbirths, and fertility problems.
@@eburel506
Oh I know, Lately I have seen a theory Henry was Kell positive.
At the moment I can't recall if any of Henry's other wives were related to him.
It's a given he never "bed" Anne of Cleves.
He never got Catherine Howard or Katherine Parr pregnant
i’m just wondering how did his wives communicate with him? there seemed to be no common language…
Royality back then all spoke French
It was the nobility’s language
Latin was the common language as well, it was part of their education for royalty to be fluent in many languages.
@@canaryjulia ooh, i see. thanks!
@@anngcampbellbower4385 ooh, i see. thanks!
She learned Spanish, but at first there was someone translating to one another
I was so pleasantly surprised to hear you drop the H in Henrietta's name when saying her name à la française Bravo! 👌🙏
She was half-English. Her brother was Charles 11 of. Britain. He called her Minette
awww. i love your longer videos.
His autopsy cannot be relied upon; it was clearly propaganda amongst people who had no respect for him.
You’re saying that medical evidence is propaganda? You know something you can present scientific proof of a claim with? Were your parents related to each other too?
@@bennu547coroners can be paid off in any time period, my brother. "Medical evidencd" is only as reliable as the author and circumstance like any other source of information.
@@bennu547The autopsy description is the most ridiculous thing ever. It's not reliable.
@@youwhat.And it's from 1700.
Objectivity didn't exist in Europe then
@@erdood3235 exactly 😂
Schools need to teach how to critically think about and question the sources of info they receive... but then the people funding the schools might be questioned and we can't have that. But that's another debate altogether lol
Marie herself was the product of a marriage of first cousins.
I swear they all look like Elden Ring humanoids.
No way they were all this ugly 😂
LMAOAOAOAO THAT MADE ME GO INTO A WHEEZING FIT THATS CRUEL
I never thought I would say it's too bad she couldn't marry her first cousin. Ugh.
same 😂
Poor guy!!! 🥺
I have a hard time believing the people back then DIDN'T realize the perils of inbreeding
Charle II was the wake up call for a lot of the Royal houses. The French Bourbons went to Poland for an unrelated bride for Louis XV.
I wander what she would tell everyone but everyone knows about so called secret relationship even the cousin wife to be and her boyfriend.
If Mortal Faces wants a challenge, he can try to find out my family tree. My mother's side is from Spain and my father's side is from Iraq (they never used last names until they immigrated to the US 40 years ago) and my father's side are indigenous people so they have 9000 years of history in the region. lol
Hope they liked drool.
I think I read somewhere that Charles II’s infertility may not have even been due to his being inbred, but due to congenital syphilis.
Which makes the family even more disgusting. I didn't think that was possible.
Which was most likely a result of inbreeding. As being inbred does make you more susceptible to things. But we can't say for sure.
Isn’t 72 ANCIENT in 1740?! 🤯
Why don't you show the men in animation?
Its puzzling why Charles II was not declared unfit to rule, whereas Juana of Castille (Catherine of Aragon's sister) was when Philip of Burgundy her husband and co-ruler died. I think a possible reason is that the Spanish wouldnt have wanted Charles's sister Marie Theresa to become Queen because she was married to Louis XIV of France, and anyway, her claim to the throne of Spain was supposed to have been surrendered under the 1659 Treaty of the Pyrenees between France and Spain. The failure of Spain to pay the massive dowry became an excuse by Louis XIV to invade the Spanish Netherlands as his wife's inheritance. Charles II had an illegitimate halg brother John of Austria who was a fairly successful soldier in the Thirty Years War but he was at odds with the Queen Mother Mariana Victoria, who probably wanted to rule through her incompetent son, Charles II.
That is because he was fit to rule. I would like to inform you that every negative thing you learned about Charles is Bourbon propaganda that Philip of Anjou made. Because they want to make himself look good so that the Spanish people will take his side. It is sad to think of it because Charles gave him the throne because he was his half sister's grandson and he is the only one who can unite the empire. Most videos about him did not explain his good contributions as a monarch just talk about the inbred stuff and the Eugenia bullying story. I would like to remind you that this is the 1600's it is a different time period that does not accept anyone who is disabled. He himself faces scrutiny just because of his jaw. about him and reads books about him. By the way every royal family back then is a wreath so he is not the only one to perform this. Why do people act as if it was his fault. It is sad that little was discussed about his personality and resiliency. He was a nice man who was deeply patriotic who defended his nation from France at the time. France was always waging war on him and tried taking his throne. The incompetent description of Charles is false as I read books and videos on TH-cam where Spanish historians talk about him. He fixed the problems he inherited from his father. Imposed laws protecting natives ( It is true Spanish documents confirmed this) I was surprised when I found out. He was described to be a good musician who can play the clavichord, loves hunting especially in colder months, and he can dance. Charles is not so useless as history portrays him. He is just a victim of Bourbon propaganda and modern bullying is ironic for people calling out Charles for bullying Eugenia yet they bully Charles too. The level of hypocrisy is just unbelievable. Bullying still exists in this century and it is sad Eugenia deserves better literally the village treated her like garbage who tried to trespass at her house to just laugh at her at least in the palace she gets respected at the end. No one deserves to experience that not even Charles II. By the way Eugenia's nude painting is meant to symbolize a goddess and it is a tremendous honor at the time. To Spain he is not their worst king one of the best and it is sad that Bourbon propaganda brainwashed people into believing such myths. I am simply defending him because people need to learn the truth about him.
About his mother Mariana of Austria. She was not as incompetent as history always painted her to be. She was incredibly smart and tried her best with the situation she was given. She faced challenges like the war of devoIution where Louis XIV tried to take Spain. Mariana of course had to defend her and her son's position. She succeeded in defeating Louis. Made peace negotiations but overtime she was getting unpopular because she wanted to extend her regency. Another reason is because her priminister Valenzuela was not liked. After her downfall and exile she still wrote to Charles and 3 years later she returned to Court even with limited influence she still managed to run the empire efficiently. I recommend reading Queen Mother stateswoman by Silvia Mitchell.
Click more and he explains all of that.
To be fair... they aren't much better. 😂
Wow really
Poor Charles, he had a miserable and painful life. Had a good heart and have one of the best love stories in history. He loved Marie Louise and gave her support and comfort dsspite her stress and grief. He was the only joy Marie Louise had. She also learned to love Charles and treated him motherly. Which Charles liked. His second wife was the opposite she was ambitious, cold and harsh. She was only nice to Charles when she needed something. Which lead him to distrust her completely. Charles tried his best with his second wife yet she disliked him and judged him for his apperance. Charles not as bad of a king, as history writes him, he was a victim of propaganda trying to exagerate how bad he was, even though a good king of spain. His bullying toward eugenia was terrible but at his time is completely normal and he doesn't know it wrong because his ancestors and the entire court was doing it. It is also sad this man is only known for inbreeding and is ugly apperance. Some poeple just love to make fun of him without knowing more about him. 😢😢
Wait, why are you defending him as if he was your dad or something?😂
@@spider-internet9782 I would like to first inform you that every negative thing you learned about Charles is Bourbon propaganda that Philip of Anjou made. Because they want to make himself look good so that the Spanish people will take his side. It is sad to think of it because Charles gave him the throne because he was his half sister's grandson and he is the only one who can unite the empire. Most videos about him did not explain his good contributions as a monarch just talk about the inbred stuff and the Eugenia bullying story. I would like to remind you that this is the 1600's it is a different time period that does not accept anyone who is disabled. He himself faces scrutiny just because of his jaw. about him and reads books about him. By the way every royal family back then is a wreath so he is not the only one to perform this. Why do people act as if it was his fault. It is sad that little was discussed about his personality and resiliency. He was a nice man who was deeply patriotic who defended his nation from France at the time. France was always waging war on him and tried taking his throne. The incompetent description of Charles is false as I read books and videos on TH-cam where Spanish historians talk about him. He fixed the problems he inherited from his father. Imposed laws protecting natives ( It is true Spanish documents confirmed this) I was surprised when I found out. He was described to be a good musician who can play the clavichord, loves hunting especially in colder months, and he can dance. Charles is not so useless as history portrays him. He is just a victim of Bourbon propaganda and modern bullying is ironic for people calling out Charles for bullying Eugenia yet they bully Charles too. The level of hypocrisy is just unbelievable. Bullying still exists in this century and it is sad Eugenia deserves better literally the village treated her like garbage who tried to trespass at her house to just laugh at her at least in the palace she gets respected at the end. No one deserves to experience that not even Charles II. By the way Eugenia's nude painting is meant to symbolize a goddess and it is a tremendous honor at the time. To Spain he is not their worst king one of the best and it is sad that Bourbon propaganda brainwashed people into believing such myths.
The fact that you just comment and make fun of people is beyond him. I am defending him because people need to learn the truth about him.
Ví byla rasa ste strašňe z mutovanay toje strašný a prcaj se nazajem
Bro these faces are...
I think the second wife was much prettier.
They must have needed ye olde Cosby Cocktail 😂
Gross, they had to boink a monster
They dranked enough wine to take the edge off. 😂😂
☠️
Ugh! Royals!
I know a female who is fighting for the right to have sex with her cousin , im waiting for her , to get pregnant and see how they will handle it. Also i want how she would look pregnant
Her kids will not necessarily look odd or have problems. It’s just that the chance is higher.
She'll look the same as if pregnant from someone else. That obsession against marrying cousins is an American thing, in Europe and the Middle East was quite common. If it's once in a few generations it won't be very significative, unless highly damaging recessive genes run in the family.
My grandparents were 1st degree cousins, my mother was perfectly normal. Died at 72 because she quitted wanting to live, but had no health issues whatsoever.
😂😂😂😂😂