Electrical Engineering: Basic Laws (12 of 31) Kirchhoff's Laws: A Harder

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ส.ค. 2024
  • Visit ilectureonline.com for more math and science lectures!
    In this video I will use Kirchhoff's law to find the currents in each branch of multiple-loop and voltage circuit.
    Next video in this series can be seen at:
    • Electrical Engineering...

ความคิดเห็น • 351

  • @BentHestad
    @BentHestad 7 ปีที่แล้ว +216

    Sir! There should be a Nobel price for excellence in teaching! And You should get the first!

  • @buffysummers1177
    @buffysummers1177 3 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    I was stuck on this topic for such a long time and in only 9 minutes I understood it, you really saved me an all-nighter. Thank you so much. Your teaching is phenomenal.

  • @ii_ragee752
    @ii_ragee752 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    this professor saved the day. I spent hours trying to understand this stuff till I watched this thanks PROFESSOR. 9 minutes saved 24 hours.

  • @ladyvader4358
    @ladyvader4358 5 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Nobel prize for teaching!You are a great teacher, sir!Thanks for all the tutorials!

  • @philipjohn1338
    @philipjohn1338 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    You, Sir, are the kind of professor I need.

  • @melissapardo2688
    @melissapardo2688 6 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    You're the best! I wish you were my professor.

  • @jacobb7379
    @jacobb7379 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Bruh this is so beautifully smooth. I was literally melting my brain before but not I can answer these questions in 2 seconds.
    Also, I’m not at university yet, but I can still understand this because of the really easy method of assuming the direction of current. Thank you so much sir

  • @thapedimahapa2564
    @thapedimahapa2564 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    You out of all the videos I have seen have made me understand kirchoffs rule. Especially when it comes to the direction convention for voltages. Keep it up sir

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Glad you found our videos and you found them helpful. 🙂

  • @chinny3393
    @chinny3393 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I really recommend this proffesor. Ive been struggling to anwer my homework for 3 hours but within just 9 minutes I manage to finish it with the help of this video. THANK YOU VERY MUCH SIR!!

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thank you. Glad you found our videos. We have covered all topics in physics on this channel.

  • @enviivalentin9403
    @enviivalentin9403 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I just wanted to say THANK YOU! I've watched like 10 videos trying to understand this Law and honestly, you've made it so easy to understand!! In very short steps which I love!

  • @sudheerm.s6792
    @sudheerm.s6792 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Only this guy in TH-cam clearly got an idea about kirchhoff's law.

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Glad you like the videos on Kirchhoff's laws.

  • @sleeping4cat
    @sleeping4cat 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Not gonna lie! I missed some lectures of my Electrical Physics class. And I tried to make it up using Khan Academy and other videos and online resources unfortunately all pf them were crappy except this guy! He made Kricchoff's rule sound so easy now I can easily take nap knowing I'm prepared for my exams! Thanks Man!

  • @abdussalamadeagbo7441
    @abdussalamadeagbo7441 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    After watching your videos I actually have confidence for my exams. You are truly a great teacher. Thank you.

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Happy to hear that! Good luck on your exams.

  • @apangmasan346
    @apangmasan346 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I love your precise teaching. Straight and clear. Appreciate your intelligence

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Thank you. Glad you found our videos!

  • @spartacusferdo1178
    @spartacusferdo1178 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thank you very much..honestly..I went through several videos...but you gave me the enlightenment..even in school, this went terribly wrong! especially the direction of the flow, you mentioned it clearly! just fafded away my doubts! thank you, Sir!

  • @zerograv
    @zerograv 6 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    thank you ...you saved me because i just couldn't wrap my head around it ... now i only need to find out how to put it in a matrix and i'll be set ^^

  • @flitzert3716
    @flitzert3716 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The World need people like you profesor

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you, we appreciate your comment.

  • @maxima4116
    @maxima4116 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    im back on your channel again for our last quiz and the hardest one yet (all about kirchhoff's law). i understood this very quickly thank you for ur tutorials!

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Welcome back! Good luck on your exam!

  • @nicholasjaikeran5041
    @nicholasjaikeran5041 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Best mathematics and physics teacher in the world

  • @mathiasgrenacs3680
    @mathiasgrenacs3680 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    3 unknown currents. Use Kirchoff's laws (1st law once, 2nd law twice) and Ohm's law to establish system of 3 algebraic equations. Put that in any math software or any TI, HP pocket calculator and it's done.

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yes indeed, solving the 3 equations 3 unknowns type of problem can be done with any app or program or calculator which has that programmed. But it is important that we learn how to do that.

  • @rollandjeffersonmejia5983
    @rollandjeffersonmejia5983 7 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Thank you so much sir. I will recommend you to all of my friends. Keep on making tutorial! By the way you look like Steve Jobs :)

  • @savahnnacunningham7463
    @savahnnacunningham7463 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    THANK YOU! You are a gifted teacher and I learn so much from watching your videos.

  • @Lew.6
    @Lew.6 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Just left this open on my laptop for revision tomorrow. I bet it will help more than any of my dumb lecturers

  • @dinusiva3019
    @dinusiva3019 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Sir ur a great teacher......u deserve a hatts off......

  • @em-cee1057
    @em-cee1057 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Thank you so very much!! Have been of immense help with my Physics classes! Thumbs up, keep up the good work.

  • @RickoRiak
    @RickoRiak 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Finally i understand it,
    After long time

  • @RayleenSevua
    @RayleenSevua ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir! You are the best professor I need.

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you. Glad you found our videos. 🙂

  • @mmabathomakhura2381
    @mmabathomakhura2381 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    After watching multiple videos over a few months , i got even more confused but today i stumbled upon this video and i understand this topic. Thank you sir for the great work

  • @TheCeremoniesOfIsrael
    @TheCeremoniesOfIsrael 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    U are brilliant God has designed u perfectly to help humanity God bless u

  • @hrithikkhemani3230
    @hrithikkhemani3230 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    amazing thank you i wish i had him has a teacher.

  • @christophersparkes2986
    @christophersparkes2986 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank god for this video. I was about to lose my mind.

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Glad you found it, 🙂

  • @taiwoonasanya2746
    @taiwoonasanya2746 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you sir,I wish you were my professor

  • @danielgray2280
    @danielgray2280 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks a lot, I am a senior high student and I have been facing problem but becus of you I now understand it well

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Great! Glad you found our videos. 🙂

  • @yohanneskebede2323
    @yohanneskebede2323 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you sir, you are really the best teacher ever.

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Wow, thanks. We appreciate your comment. 🙂

  • @Drone360pilot
    @Drone360pilot 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Bravo! Mr. Michel !!! Brilliant and clean explanation ! Deep respect ! 🤓

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you. Glad you found it helpful. 🙂

  • @setenaysimsek4667
    @setenaysimsek4667 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I LOVE YOU SO MUCH.You are the best teacher ı have ever seen.I don't have to memorize everthing no longer

  • @bobsual3912
    @bobsual3912 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank u helps a lot. Im a grade12 students for the Philippines

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Great! Glad you found our videos. Welcome to the channel! 🙂

  • @vigorixx
    @vigorixx ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You have my appreciation.

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you. Glad you found our videos. 🙂

  • @joannabaidoo331
    @joannabaidoo331 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    THANK YOU SO MUCH ! I WISH I KNEW YOUR ADDRESS TO SEND YOU LOADS OF GIFTS. YOU ARE GIFTED ! PLEASE KEEP DOING WHAT YOU ARE DOING
    GOD BLESS YOU !

  • @purixlupa1
    @purixlupa1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sir thank you for always posting helpful videos. 🙏

  • @jonathana9236
    @jonathana9236 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have a problem similar to this except with different numbers and have had trouble with the currents. Major Thank you for this

  • @cosmocelli
    @cosmocelli 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you for this! I've learned so much from watching you videos. Kudos to you sir!

  • @PatchFact
    @PatchFact 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Awesome video, thanks

  • @successmotivation2997
    @successmotivation2997 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Please dont stop teaching your a expert

  • @austinfritzke9305
    @austinfritzke9305 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You need a nobel prize for teaching just for that bow tie

  • @wendymari8504
    @wendymari8504 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks, this really helped me to understand it easier

  • @OmarAhmed-sr2bt
    @OmarAhmed-sr2bt 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nice explanation Profesor!

  • @hirunrashentha1082
    @hirunrashentha1082 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks alot sir 😊
    Excellence teaching

  • @domfackloic8930
    @domfackloic8930 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir I just want to say am very happy with the explanation it going to help alot and I also want say keep up

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Glad you found our videos. 🙂

    • @domfackloic8930
      @domfackloic8930 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MichelvanBiezen yes sir and hope to see more

  • @mubarakrikiji6548
    @mubarakrikiji6548 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice job sir . Indeed i enjoyed the lecture . Keep on making life easy for us

  • @paulperriman9144
    @paulperriman9144 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I had an issue understanding how to do this..well.. not any more great teaching.. still not sure of the math procedure but very good.

  • @sunnysun6358
    @sunnysun6358 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Hi, is there any other way u could explain the general sign convention when applying KVL? And in the case of loop 2, why is the equation 8 i2+ 6 i3 -4=0 instead of 8 i2+ 6 i3 +4=0. Isn't the current flow opposite to direction of loop for 4V voltage source? Many thanks :)

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Since you are going around loop 2 in a counterclockwise direction, you cross the battery from the positive end of the battery to the negative end, thus there is a 4V voltage drop. When picking current directions in each branch it doesn't matter if the directions are correct. (The assumed directions could be opposite to the real directions). Then work out the problem as is shown. If you picked the incorrect direction, your answer(s) will come out negative.

  • @vinoriawareba9438
    @vinoriawareba9438 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks for the help sir ☺️.. great explaination 🤌🏼

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you. You are welcome.

  • @yeonieee1
    @yeonieee1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sir, In getting the I2 why 6(-0.308)-4 becomes 4+6(0.308). I'm confused. It should 4-6(0.308), right?

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      We moved the two terms to the other side and therefore the sign changes. A - B - C = 0 becomes A = B + C

  • @lounesbenali4889
    @lounesbenali4889 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    THANK YOU SO MUCH !

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You are welcome. Glad the videos are helpful.

  • @anhdo6351
    @anhdo6351 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    very good and helpful lectures from you. Hope all the best for you.

  • @dynamic_jameson
    @dynamic_jameson ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Awesome work 😃

  • @Dhaarshini2210
    @Dhaarshini2210 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    omggg ....my life saver , thank you so much

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Glad you found our videos and that they were helpful. 🙂

  • @mike-yp1uk
    @mike-yp1uk 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great teaching

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Glad you think so! 🙂

  • @anisa676
    @anisa676 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    thank you very much

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      You are welcome. Glad you found our videos. 🙂

  • @ngetichvictor-7901
    @ngetichvictor-7901 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It's really impressive,,

  • @mahlatsesteam3670
    @mahlatsesteam3670 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank u so much sir for your tutorials..means a lot to me

  • @ngetichvictor-7901
    @ngetichvictor-7901 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice work sir,,,it is understandable sir 🎉

  • @sangeethatatineni6214
    @sangeethatatineni6214 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you soo much sir, it was soo helpful. Good job !!

  • @ShlomsDaGangSta
    @ShlomsDaGangSta 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    When you find the other currents, why do you plug in -.0308 Amps for I3. What if i assumed the correct direction for I3 at first, and got a positive value, then my I1 and I2 would be different values

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      +Shlomo No, you would get the same values for I1 and I2, no matter what direction you assume for any of the currents.

  • @abdullahibello349
    @abdullahibello349 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    God bless you❤

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you. God bless you as well! 🙂

  • @terencewright2223
    @terencewright2223 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you very much for the excellent video.

  • @chinwubaamadi
    @chinwubaamadi หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I don't seem to get it.
    Why are we multiplying it by 2 and 3? Is it because of the equation tag (Equation 2 & Equation 3).

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It is an algebra technique to solve the two equations two unknowns type of problem.

  • @christopherwilkins8954
    @christopherwilkins8954 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Surely there's a better way to do these problems... Been stuck on these Loop and Junction rules all semester. How do you know which variable to solve for first for?

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This is a very classic example of the use of Kirchhoff's rules. Hopefully after watching a few examples it will make sense. (We have similar examples in the physics playlists as well which is a prerequisite to this course).

  • @AG-cx1ug
    @AG-cx1ug 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    When we draw the Loop 2 - its in the opposite direction to I3 - I didn't understand this part. Thank you.

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The arrows in the center of the loops, simply show the direction of "travel" around the loop (which is independent of the current direction) in order to add up all the voltages. KVL

  • @sarah53062
    @sarah53062 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The loops must be in the same direction? Both clockwise, or both anti-clock. Or can I do ine clock and the other anti-clock?

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They do not need to be in the same direction. You can go around each loop in any direction you like.

  • @siddheshsatam1520
    @siddheshsatam1520 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks Man you rock

  • @abioladivine-peaceokikijes1657
    @abioladivine-peaceokikijes1657 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you
    Please will changing the position of any one voltage source change any of the equation

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Not if the voltage source remains oriented the same way and stays on the same branch. Once it is moved to a different branch, it will change the equations.

    • @abioladivine-peaceokikijes1657
      @abioladivine-peaceokikijes1657 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MichelvanBiezen you actually replied. I love you Siirrr.
      Thank you, I understand

  • @sufian4094
    @sufian4094 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thank you Mr. Michel !

  • @orthogonal9159
    @orthogonal9159 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The video is indeed helpful☺👏

  • @maeregbeyene8635
    @maeregbeyene8635 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you so much 😢

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You are welcome. Glad you found our videos. 🙂

  • @carlosmiguelbarros
    @carlosmiguelbarros 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    6.24 - why do you add the equations instead of subtracting? According to my notes we have been subtracting in class… I’m confused

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You can do it either way. The algebraic method of elimination can be done either way.

  • @rahulbhat8518
    @rahulbhat8518 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you sir

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You are welcome. Glad it was helpful. 🙂

  • @davidmwansa1187
    @davidmwansa1187 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Why was equation one changed to negative ? It was I1 +I3 = I2 what happens when you solve it directly?

  • @benitayuson2968
    @benitayuson2968 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent job

  • @shnurik01
    @shnurik01 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    why did you multiply the 1st equation by 2, and 2nd equation by 3? is that just random?

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      That is an algebraic method of solving 2 linear equations. (method of elimination)

  • @MG-vb6ms
    @MG-vb6ms 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Can we apply Ohm's law for 4 ohm resistance and 10 v voltage? In that case current I1 will be equal to
    10/4=2.5amp.which does not match with our I1.

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No, you can't use the simple Ohm's law equation here because you have multiple voltage sources. Each source affects each branch in a way that is difficult to predict, unless you use Kirchhoff's rules.

    • @MG-vb6ms
      @MG-vb6ms 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@MichelvanBiezen Thanks a million for the fast reply.

  • @aderajewkumie-so2bs
    @aderajewkumie-so2bs 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    thanks

  • @azenethgarcia4570
    @azenethgarcia4570 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    you are literally my life saver! thank you so much!

  • @biridun9999
    @biridun9999 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why I1 and I2 goes down together instead of them splitting some of their currents to the both resistors i did not get that.

    • @biridun9999
      @biridun9999 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Oh i get it now, divided the problem into two sections and calculated the currents of each voltages then combined them together and got the same results.

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Great. Glad you figured it out.

  • @cosmos8366
    @cosmos8366 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    At 7:50 when you moved 6(-0.308) to the other side you changed te negative sign to a positive which i get but why didn't the positive 6 change to a negative. I'm still learning algebra so I'm still learning all the tricks of moving everything around. Thanks David.

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      - 6 (0.308) = 6 (- 0.308) but that is NOT equal to -6 (- 0.308) = 6 (0.308)

    • @cosmos8366
      @cosmos8366 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MichelvanBiezen looking at your answer I couldn't figure out but after doing the calculations now it makes sense. doing it your way gets a positive1.848 which is right. doing it my way would have resulted in a -1.848 which is wrong. As a beginner I would not have known that and would have changed the 6 to a negative. Is that allways the case, if a number is multiplied by a number in brackets you change the sign of the numbers in the brackets but the number outside the bracket you don't change. Isthere some kind of albebra rule that states that. Thanks for your help David

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, you have to be VERY careful with the signs doing these types of problems.

  • @myzahra4029
    @myzahra4029 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thank you

  • @yusufmustafa7323
    @yusufmustafa7323 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir , I have a question
    What will happen if we take one loop clock wise and the other one anti clockwise
    Or one of them anti clockwise and the other clockwise.

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It doesn't matter. You will get the same result. (but you have to keep track of your voltage rises and drops according to the direction you choose. Note by reversing direction, you'll get the negative result of the result you got from your original direction.

  • @treemanfan7718
    @treemanfan7718 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Could you correct me? I put i3 as clockwise which created i1 = i2+ i3. I moved the terms to get i1-i2 = i3. I plugged this into resistor 6 creating 6(i1-i2). Doing the system of equations I get an i1 of -0.18 which is different from your answer.

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The answers in the video are correct. 6(i1 - i2) is not correct as a voltage drop

  • @cepha30
    @cepha30 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks alot

  • @amadusbah8770
    @amadusbah8770 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Excellent

  • @NkemkaGentle
    @NkemkaGentle 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thanks so much sir for this 💯it made me understand better as beginner,
    But where my problems lies now is at your final answer in I2 i couldn't understand how you got 0.731A
    Pls sir can you explain it to me
    I'm just a beginner 🙏🏾

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Use equation 3 which only contains I2 and I3 and I3 is known. So substitute for I3 and now you have an equation with only 1 variable I2.

    • @NkemkaGentle
      @NkemkaGentle 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MichelvanBiezen thank you so much sir I've gotten it
      I really appreciate, you're one in a million teachers 💯

  • @pradipbista607
    @pradipbista607 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    sir, why did you assume loop2 in a clockwise direction?

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      It doesn't matter. You can assume either direction and it will work.

  • @xcarnage8632
    @xcarnage8632 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    sir you are god in disguise... thank you

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Not in the least. Just another person trying to do his little part in the world.

  • @woodychelton5590
    @woodychelton5590 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    is it correct to say that the voltage in that bottom node that I2 passes into via the 8 ohm resistor is 0?

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Since the node is not connected to ground we don't know. Only if that section of the circtuit is connected to ground do we know that the voltage is zero.

  • @deadbunnyeyes190
    @deadbunnyeyes190 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is it possible to obtain the currents in a situation exactly like this but with another resistor at the second loop? I reckon it wouldn't be since there'd be 4 unknowns but only 3 equations...

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You can have any number of resistors in any of the loops and this method will still work. We have examples like that.

  • @user-mt7if9ru3w
    @user-mt7if9ru3w ปีที่แล้ว +1

    should I get the same result if I used the mesh analysis method?

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, you should obtain the same result no matter what method you use.

  • @rowendylcasta3465
    @rowendylcasta3465 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thankyou sir! Now I already understand it.

  • @elsaberespoder5035
    @elsaberespoder5035 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love you Sr. Thanks so much.

  • @vedangisekra9399
    @vedangisekra9399 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sir, do we have any short trick to solve these types of problems?
    I am preparing for NEET ( medical entrance exam in India ), so we have very little time to solve such problems...
    It would be great if you can tell a short trick. please

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      For this type of problem there is really no short cut. But that said, it does depend a lot on how the questions are asked on the exam. We are currently making a number of videos on the JEE advanced tests and often you don't have to work out the problem in detail to find the correct answers. We illustrate that in those videos. We haven't looked at the NEET exam yet. But we will and we'll try to determine how to best prepare for that. Our time is very limited, so we don't know when we can get to it.

    • @vedangisekra9399
      @vedangisekra9399 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MichelvanBiezen oh ok thank you, sir

    • @carultch
      @carultch ปีที่แล้ว

      @@vedangisekra9399 There is a shortcut. It's the method of superposition.
      To give an overview, you "turn on" one source at a time, and "turn off" the other sources.. Voltage sources become shorts when "turned off", and current sources become open gaps when "turned off".
      You then assign a point, or several points at which it is of interest to find the voltage, and would help you solve for everything else you'd like to know. Then you find the voltage at that point, exclusively due to each individual source. Then you add up the partial voltages, to find the total voltage at the waypoint you assigned. You then have the voltage at that point, which you can use to solve for everything else.
      This turns algebra into plug-and-chug arithmetic.