Channel Update on Unifying Theory and a Little Rant
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 ก.ย. 2024
- Thank you to my audience and all of you who have reached out and encouraged me (or are bugging me to add more content). Ultimately, my plans for jumping the gun on being a "TH-camr" have derailed a bit, but my commitment to the content itself has not waivered.
I have had a great time getting to know a lot of different people through both the science enthusiast community, and in academia. It has boosted my confidence that we are on the right track, and the answers are all ready and waiting for someone to tie them all together.
As I mentioned in my video as well, my daughter/editor has been doing some her own work, which I encourage you to checkout here:
• Feed The Machine (Unof...
I am confident the next video will be worth the wait. In the meantime, my video on "How Words Get Their Meaning" was just as important a project as my science videos, and I want to encourage all of you (especially the science fans) to check that out as well (or just leave it on while you poo) to help be breakthrough some algorithm stagnation. Thanks!
How Words Get Their Meaning
• How Words Get Their Me...
- I am patient. Based on what I have seen, I expect this will be worth the wait.
Thank you!
Yep
You are my HERO right now, man. It's like you said, there are geniuses, "Einstein's", everywhere, everyday. Picking tomatoes and mopping floors or something.
The barriers that keep the genius in the "average joe clothes" are THE greatest obstacle between us and advancements at truly blazing speeds. I'm beyond glad that you are your theory are getting the respect that you deserve for pursuing this, and I will be cheering you on as the journey continues. Godspeed, Chris.
Wow, thanks!
The obstacles that are holding Einsteins from doing their theories of relativity are actually two things: the capitalism and the class-based society made by capitalism.
No need to be sorry in the slightest Chris.
You've got a patient and thoughtful audience who don't mind waiting.
Your work is just brilliant, so look after yourself.
I'm excited for you and the next instalment.
Im glad you are making the effort to collaborate with your daughter. Working with people you love can really amplify and showcase strengths that could be under utilized by each individual. I love the informal tone paired with your no-nonsense ontology. I hope you continue to create what you think is good, rather than chasing numbers. You've got something unique that's hard to quantify but it comes through loud and clear. It would be a shame to lose that.
Take as much time as you need. You've picked a tough subject. I wait patiently to hear what you come up with.
Keep kickin’ butt Chris! ^.^
In fact, sometimes we need "outsiders" to bring new life and new thoughts to disciplines
Good call on "class-based gatekeeping of scientific brilliance". Been advocating that same idea, for years. Looking forward to the next video!
Looking forward to your video and I support you as well.
I’d also like to add that it’s hard to find people that “think outside the box” and don’t limit themselves to what “everyone thinks” is the correct thing.
A lot of people limit themselves because they believe it’s important to conform to the general consensus and like you said, that “general consensus” also limits itself because it makes people conform to itself.
There is a lot of security in conformity and everyone just wants to be a peace and then there’s that rare person like you who is willing to step out of the box and start throwing chairs. I like it.
Ive been wondering about updates on your mind blowing theory for a while now and just for the first time got a notification, despite having you set on ALL...... Im glad this one showed up eventually.
You are so so so right, especially about how we should diversify thinking.
I cannot wait to hear more from you, altho I happily will as long as it takes!!
Great things take time, and this has been, to me at least, one of the greatest and most logical theories I ever got presented with..!
Really, wtf with yt notifications? I'm don't getting them for Chris videos neither.
@@true_xander I guess THEY dont want to let you know about the TRUE physics of the universe 😳😅😂
Not only I'm checking regularly your channel to get any update on your ideas, but I'd also like to thank you for being so open-minded and propositive. I totally agree on your Many Einsteins Interpretation (even if one doesn't have the proper tools to investigate and refine an hypothesis, maybe he could still have great intuition that others would want to address): thank you again for all your work, I can't wait to hear from you more on the topic.
I don't want to spoil anything, but I am so excited about the potential of you collaborating with other science youtubers or even other academics. I won't pretend to understand everything about your theory, but your description of gravity as a dimension has already taken hold in my brain. Glad to hear you continue to develop this.
Thanks for the update. I find your theory the most interesting and compelling idea I've seen in a long time. Take your time, I look forward to your next video.
I'll take that time to re -watch all previous videos couple time more to wrap my head around it better. Despite my understanding of the topic is far beyond street's average, I'm still need it. Thank you, Chris, again for your titanic work. It's very important and we appreciate it. Who knows, maybe it will lead us to the stars with antigravity or teleportation at hand.
Thanks for all you do (and put up with.) Your videos are certainly worth waiting for. Keep up the good work!
Dude thanks for linking you kiddos work. Its wonderful.
Hey dude you are awesome ..
I hope many blessings on you and your daughter! ... thanks for your work!
Love your channel ❤keep going . You've got this. Take your time . Your content is amazing.
Love your channel. I believe in what you're doing and how you're doing it.
Keep up the good work, very excited for when its ready :)
Take care man! I would like to voice my support, and say I look forward to your future videos.
Wow a paper is actually very exciting! I look forward to sinking my teeth in 😆
I wait patiently as well. Love your videos and thoughts. Hopefully it hasn't been too stressful. Would be cool to just have a conversation with you one day.
we taking bets? i'm guessing some kind of hidden variable aspect? especially with the talk in the other videos of higher dimensions and how to detect them.... I waited 13 years "fear inoculum" and that was well worth it... i'll wait for the next in this series as well....! ;)
There is one thing I agree with you very much and that is what you talked about from about the middle. I have felt it myself. When I comment about some thing I think I know a little about I also run into that people justify their statements and ideas by their education and other achievements. I do it a little my self too in justifying why my idea may have some weight but all that shouldn't have any influence. An idea should be tested for what it is and not for who brought it up. An idea may be right although the person bringing it up does it for totally wrong reasons and justifications as well. I am an electronic engineer and I dabble in many things but I am yet to find anything that there isn't some body else that knows more about - except being me as nobody else can be me.
I did a PhD in physics, and your insight and arguments is way (way) beyond what I managed. This is a brilliant channel, thank you.
Thank you very much
First off, quality takes time. I'd rather you take your time and put out the best video you can.
Second, Feed the Machine rocks. Your daughter is good people.
This is awesome! Love your rant, couldn't agree more.
Keep up the great work and make sure you enjoy yourself.
Great to hear! Looking forward to it!
take care of yourself man.
i can see the stress on you.
we physicist have a knack for lack of self care
some of the comments here are pretending the video is about them when theyre saying absolutely nonsense
No one would ever project on the Internet.
The channel Dialect is filling the void 😊
If we keep thinking about things the way we've always have, and can only think about them in the ways mainstream science has always accepted, then how are we going to solve the quantum and dimensionality questions? We require a new way of thinking and percieving, to pull back the curtain of mystery about the fundamentals of our universe, and hopefully it will in turn help us achieve a better level of consciousness, we most certainly need right now.
I can't ..oh actually I definately can wait the next video. Take the time it takes to perfect it, or actually near perfet it, never try to perfect anything unles it surely is possible 😜
The answer could likely involve having a strong understanding of black holes and likely wormholes.
I think your light compass requires a measurement system for the one-way speed of light, and you seem to believe you have figured that out. So, I'd suggest that you simply start small and write your paper on how you intend to accomplish this (measuring the one-way speed of light). Assuming you have solved this dilemma, you'd easily be able to claim your Nobel prize.
Not as simple as that, but yes that's still in the works. There is a chance we might be able to do a "small scale" version that validates the mechanics. Still.... money.
The path forward right now is to focus on smaller, cheaper, and more accessible ideas and experiments and work our way up.
I give Einstein all the respect he deserves as a bright mind. But how could I forget Newton?, or Archimedes? or Pythagoras? or Leonardo? (yes, that one!) or ... you get the idea.
Then, it occurred to me that if "ONE IN A MILLION" human beings are extreme geniuses, then we have at least 8,000 LIVING GENIUSES as we speak. If we count the one in one hundred thousand intellects of superior reach, then we have 80,000 such people and if we go to the one in one thousand (not a hundred, but a thousand) then we reach the not shabby figure of EIGHT MILLION already superlative minds. ... So much for the theory of the "one" mind in a Century that changes the Universe, completely forgetting that we live in a "continuum" intellectual development and accumulation of knowledge.
For example, I think you, Chris, are such a man. I can't wait for your Treatise on the question of Quantum Mechanics...
Thank you for your insights.
Much appreciated. I like those odds!
I knew from the start it would be long time waiting in between
Maybe if the videos were 15 minutes long, but you choose the 1hour+ format. I don't see how people could expect anything else (without being quite entitled), honestly
👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼
Looking forward to your video and especially your perspective of HOW you will show to us the way YOU see that QM and Gravity can be unified.
While trained as an engineering person to the MS level, and all my professional life having worked in the engineering field, I am also a biblical Christian, and thus I have come to understand and know that the Universe was created about 6000 years ago (rounding) in a series of six days (24 hours rounding). Recall, I am not a history or arts or commerce major, and so I KNOW WHAT science entails and requires TO BE science, and what its limits are.
I say this because there are reasons Gravity and QM will not ever be fully unified SUCH THAT we can have a ToE. While there can be some effects of gravity on QM, I am unable to see HOW the reverse is even possible.
There is ONE and ONLY ONE reason people. nearly doggedly, want to make the two be unified. I'll get into it after you post the video.
Nevertheless, I look forward to your video and seeing what I might learn in this coming one; I have learned a lot from your earlier ones.
Einstein would be happy with only 1 person with a valid argument against his theory, be it a scholar or an outsider. Your theory is better than the ones being parrotted by all the scholars only interested in securing funding if only if it is independent thinking, so free of predetermined logic, to solve current state some free-form thinking is essential, something academia has forgotten how to do that. Thank you.
can you name some of these theories being parroted by scholars only to secure funding?
@@lindsayweir4931 Sure but I name only one and "leave the rest up to the reader", because you should be able to recognise plenty of them. The "Spooky action at a distance".
People scream for MORE!
Einsteinian gravity's predictions match observations better than Newtonian gravity's predictions. Similarly, the standard model - imperfect as it is - has better predictive power than any alternative explanations. While your ideas are interesting and compelling, unless your ideas result in more accurate predictions some aspect (or aspects) of reality than general relativity or quantum mechanics, then your ideas will simply remain fringe curiosities and not become a generally accepted scientific theory. The current academic system - again, imperfect as it is - is the best approach humanity has found for advancing knowledge. If you look closely, you'll find that no one's ideas are ignored if (and only if) they can demonstrate that their ideas have greater predictive power than the ideas in textbooks.
I certainly agree that is the standard for science and my goal. (Just a note, my theory rules out wormholes and time travel, so far so good. Although, negatives make for poor predictions)
I don't think that standard is applied equally as I see plenty of "meritless" and outright misleading papers get lots of coverage, while I got a stack of dusty academic papers (not mine) in my research pile that meet that standard quite well and just went without much attention.
Look at how much attention string theory has gotten.
That said, my current issue is not a lack of predictions/experiments but rather the cost of them. So, the next goal is cheaper experiments.
@@ChrisTheBrain Thanks for replying. I have really enjoyed your videos and I generally agree with your arguments. The light compass is very cool. I hope that experiment is carried out, although I imagine that this is still an expensive experiment given the precision required. Research in string theory was necessary; perhaps, physicists have persisted with string theory for too long. However, my point is a "grand prediction" that is subsequently supported by new evidence is needed to cause a paradigm shift in science. Quantum mechanics can't be dismissed without that occurring. Anyway, I'm looking forward to your next video! Best wishes.
I think your videos are interesting. I think I'm pretty knowledgeable about physics, compared to the average person, but I'm not knowledgeable enough to analyze your ideas well enough to figure out if they are nonsense or not. I wish this channel would get the attention of someone who knows how to do that better than I can, like @lukasrafajpps has done for some other physics channels.
You do seem to know your stuff, at least to the point where I don't think you're a complete crackpot like Terrence Howard. I'm sure there are bound to be flaws in your ideas though. I say that because even the Einsteins of the world made mistakes, and benefited from having other scientists scrutinize his theories and sometimes they even proved him wrong. Even if your ideas turned out to be wildly wrong, they are different enough, that it would be very informative to have someone explain why.
I get what you're saying about the system of gatekeeping for ideas to be taken seriously. The Terrence Howards of the world show why it is necessary to have some form of gatekeeping. There are genuinely crackpots who are completely clueless, but don't realize it, and there does need to be a way to filter these people out. I also think in the information age that knowledge is freely available to people who have not gone down a traditional academic route, and there is the potential for people outside of that system to have good ideas. They won't have the same guidance as in an academic route, which could be a double edged sword. They are free to blaze their own path, but are also more likely to get lost. I'm not really sure what the solution is for opening up science to more people but still filtering the crackpots out
Terrance Howard certainly hasn't done the amateur physicists of the world any favors.
There is a difference between gatekeeping to filter out irrational ideas versus allowing only those ideas that already agree with the established status quo. Science today seems A LOT like a popularity contest and you can belong just as long as you don't rock the boat. Seems most interesting science books I've read recently were authored by PhDs in astronomy or physics (those are the topics I tend to gravitate towards) whose ideas are considered laughable by the establishment. Often these marginalized scientists are only guilty of NOT ignoring the data which suggests there may be a problem with the status quo. The purpose of peer review is to filter out the crackpots, not to ensure the status quo is maintained.
Is there no updates on the Words Matter series.
They are "in line" behind the next science video for now.
@@ChrisTheBrain that's good, please tell your daughter her music video is awesome.
@@shaunmodipane1 thanks!
You strike me as a guy with lots of reason. Something I rarely see on TH-cam, sadly.
Do what you think is the best. My take on Einstein is that he is not just wrong, but that he is completely wrong. His basic illusion is the postulate of the equivalence of acceleration and gravity. Once you understand this flaw you will release and move on to better things such as the scalar waves which, incidentally, resolves/relates time and gravitation and energy. What helps are the advances Vik Grebennikov made with real results. The theories are okay but they can be challenged by just another theory, and another, and... Once you see what Grebennikov has done you will not need the theory. Good luck.
youre a quack.
if you were correct we'd have already detected the discrepancies youre describing
Bud, I get your point for the class system but we cant give flat earthers the same voice that is how we got in this position of science denials and people not understanding basic concepts because they believe they are better than the centuries of knowledge built on by millions of people.
Good god man, I had a 33-year-old flat earther try to argue the sun isn't real because he couldn't understand how it was on fire without any oxygen. 🙄
Two ends of a problem, and I only addressed the one. I think it's a false choice to say we must choose between the ivory tower and the looney bin.
Also, I think they feed off each other.
@@ChrisTheBrainOk, looking at it from 2 ends.
Looking at one end the looney bin is from the want to believe group, I don't know if there is way for them to understand/ work with a different viewpoint which aren't their own therefore they aren't at most times able to build off other people's ideas and end up making basic errors and then the rest of us have to waste time listening to them or implement some idea because dumb people (politicians, dictators, mangers, CEOs....) are in power.
The ivory tower asks you to prove yourself before you can talk, which itself is akin to the situation of getting your first job.
The system may not be perfect but it is in the right direction maybe? not trying to take a side I am just having a hard time picturing a world where we don't need some sorta system to tell the eye(s) of the morons apart. Humans are illogical tribal creatures... we always make ingroups and then we are back at or on the path of the Ivory Tower again.
Einstein gave his child away and his wife did his mathematics.
Life can get in the way. Hahaha.
Keep the family first and build your theory. 😊
Pythagoras > Einstein
IDK He had very useful thoughts, were those greatee tho?
Dude, I’ve got an equal chance of proving the P equals or not NP conjecture as you do to unifying quantum gravity. Dunning-Kruger. The difference is is that I recognize my profound and I mean profound deficit in both intelligence and education to achieve that goal. You do not.
Actually, i think you have yet to comprehend the tiniest fraction of your ignorance
It’s taken me more than forty years to realize that 1x1=2. Expanding the mind beyond learned and preconceived notions is a trek.
bro your brain is cooked
1 is one
1x1 means one;once
which is one
2x2 is two, twice
which is four
Terrance vibes here too
Let me share my perspective, and then, if you're comfortable, I can hear yours. So one times one means you have one row and one column of something. Let's imagine a farmer grouping their cattle off with fences for this thought experiment, and they put one sheep/cow/goat/whatever per area. Let's say within this grouping they had two rows of cattle, and two columns of cattle. If we count that up into total, we would get four animals. Let me demonstrate below, with "O" representing an animal. This is what it would look like:
O O
O O
As you see, it has two rows, two columns, and four animals altogether. Let's say they had three rows, and three columns. Counting that up, we would see they have nine animals, no more, no less. This is what it would look like:
O O O
O O O
O O O
That's what multiplication means. So if they had one row, and one column of cattle, you'd count and see there's only one animal. It would just be this:
O
There's one row, and one column. If we added a second animal, there would be another row, or another column. I hope this information has helped:
Bonus: What happens when you multiply by zero? Well, lets say we have one row, and zero columns of animals. So I'd start out by drawing one row, but then when I would draw the column I realized I drew too many, and I'd have to erase all columns. This would leave me with nothing (the drawing of such is below). I hope this has helped!
@@yehudadavis3235 omg I was just trolling. Didn’t expect anyone to respond so thoughtfully. I appreciate the time and care you took in crafting such a kind and patient reply!
@@jacobmalof Lol, all good! That's on me for falling for the bait, glad you enjoyed my response. I appreciate your kind words, and I hope you have a great day!
Love your content. Would you watch a video of mine if it furthered the goal of unifying the fields and/or letting me know if im crazy? I have a video exclaimig 1/27 to be the 3D rate of gravity , and i truly believe in the concepts at hand but im weighed down by lack of proper professional physics communication and education.
Alot of the stuff you have especially about c not being the speed of light but of evolution i think connects. Thank you if you read this man!
You should check out @ArchMic44660667 and @Cure_The_CDC on X (Twitter). Nice guys, chasing similar rabbits. See if anything they got "clicks" for you, and feel free to reach out. I stay in touch, but they are more active.
@@ChrisTheBrain wow thank you so much for responding. Yeah the constants I can't get out of my head. Especially Koide's Equation turning out the way it does while using 1/4 as the 2D rate and 1/27 as the 3D rate. Once again thanks for even reading and responding
it's not that the only smart people are those with qualifications. it's that you need to understand the background before 'teaching' why einstein was wrong. you can self-study this, but it's apparent from your videos that you haven't even covered these topics at an undergraduate level. also, einstein was a patent clerk, but he was also formally educated in physics and very much a once in a century genius. don't forget, his nobel prize wasn't even for relativity. when you spend a lot of time studying physics you realize einstein's name shows up everywhere because he was an unbelievably creative and rigorous thinker, WITH the appropriate background to think about these problems coherently. you deny things like the relativity of simultaneity which is a core tenet of one of our best-tested theories with no empirical or mathematical reason to do so, so people are going to be a little irritated when you present yourself as an authority that knows more than the guy who literally invented relativity. there are many people alive who do know more about relativity than einstein ever did (since we've learned so much about it since he passed) but i don't think you are one of them. be humble about this subject because understanding it is no joke.
ps: there are many different ways of thinking in the scientific community, if you've ever been to a conference you'd immediately recognize that scientists are generally people who love to challenge each others and prove their weird ideas right (sometimes to a fault). you're assuming otherwise because you haven't taken part in the community.
No he's entirely right. The "meritocracy" of liberal capitalist academia is entirely based on class exceptionalism. The ideology of liberalism in general was created with class exceptionalism baked in.
One of Marx's main critiques & insights was how it just continues with the class distinctions & differentiations set when humans first became "civilised" by settling. They then began claiming ownership over land, crops, livestock, slaves & the produce of the slaves labour. All the way back in antiquity 6000 years ago.
He took an academic look & concluded that most differences between people are socially constructed idealism. But differences in our material conditions are objective truths.
@@randomizer2240 none of this matters insofar as you are extremely unlikely to come up with groundbreaking physics until you understand what we already know (which is a lot). i don't care if someone goes to university or not, it's besides the point.