Types of Nuclear Radiation

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 783

  • @llpqazz
    @llpqazz 7 ปีที่แล้ว +324

    Clear... concise... well presented and informative. Great video as usual.

    • @Cythil
      @Cythil 7 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      And I do like that he talked about the Q factor. People often gets the notion that Alpha radiation is next to harmless as even paper can stop that type of radiation. But the reality is that this type of radiation is the one you should be the most careful about. Radon is so scary because it is a Alpha emitting gas. (Beyond the fact that the decay chain can also produce some nasty elements)

    • @Cythil
      @Cythil 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yep

    • @Bodyknock
      @Bodyknock 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Only thing missing was Imagine Dragons' "Radioactive" at the credits. :)

    • @SpotterVideo
      @SpotterVideo 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules:
      When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. (More spatial curvature). What if gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks. (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are actually a part of the quarks. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Force" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" make sense based on this concept. Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons.
      Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons.
      Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron.
      Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves.

  • @trueopsimath
    @trueopsimath 5 ปีที่แล้ว +474

    Fermilab: "The technician doing the demos was not in an danger."
    Technician: "I'm 23 years old and had a full head of hair last week!"

    • @nicku1
      @nicku1 5 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      Fermilab: "The technician doing the demos was not in an danger." Technician: (wags friendly his tail)

    • @georgecristache5931
      @georgecristache5931 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Technician : "we did everything right"

    • @stevesmith9447
      @stevesmith9447 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Also he didn't mention that the technician is actually a Japanese woman.

    • @SumoLife
      @SumoLife 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Its only 3.6 roentgen. Not great, not terrible.

    • @ilovecops5499
      @ilovecops5499 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      They use the same radiation poreoof materisl they used when they landed mens on th emoons. Cotton with a light coatings o flkean and irons-copper malloys. Thanslkm Yous!

  • @MisterTutor2010
    @MisterTutor2010 5 ปีที่แล้ว +207

    Radiation gives you superpowers in comics and cancer in real life :)

    • @kevinmoore2501
      @kevinmoore2501 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Unless you get radiation therapy 😜

    • @Revan_258
      @Revan_258 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Or both if ur deadpool

    • @itsahurricane
      @itsahurricane 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Superpowers in death, perhaps...

    • @anothershowcaser
      @anothershowcaser 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      yep... kinda depressing

    • @user-wb7nv9ht1g
      @user-wb7nv9ht1g 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That's what they want you to believe

  • @dodger1x
    @dodger1x 5 ปีที่แล้ว +333

    HBOs Chernobyl series just gave radiation videos on TH-cam a spike in their views 😅

    • @Shadow77999
      @Shadow77999 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Lmao

    • @gbibhav
      @gbibhav 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      V86 i just came from Chernobyl

    • @Rich-hy2ey
      @Rich-hy2ey 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Too bad it was so full of BAD science.

    • @musiccellarmillerton
      @musiccellarmillerton 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Rich any examples?

    • @Rich-hy2ey
      @Rich-hy2ey 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@musiccellarmillerton How about electronic disruption caused by radiation?

  • @yunusemreozmen9160
    @yunusemreozmen9160 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    I' ve looked into lots of videos about radiation but this video is the most informative and easiest to understand so far. Thank you so much for your great efforts.

  • @nachannachle2706
    @nachannachle2706 7 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    I LOVE this man. His sense of humour and mannerisms crack me up every.single.time.
    Great videos with superb to-the-point presentation.
    You have become my favourite Physics channel!

  • @chuckles0692
    @chuckles0692 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Oh my goodness, thank you for including neutron radiation! No one ever talks about it! This has been so informative

  • @Maadhawk
    @Maadhawk 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    In the Nuclear Navy we had a saying, "You have 4 cookies. One cookie is made of alpha particles. A second is made of beta particles. A third is made of gamma rays. And the forth is made of neutrons. Which cookie do you eat? Which cookie do you hold in your hand? Which cookie do you put in your pocket? And which cookie do you throw away?" This was test knowledge of dangers of the various types of ionizing radiation. The answer is, "You hold the alpha cookie in your hand, the dead skin cells will stop the radiation. You put the beta cookie in your pocket, your clothes will stop the radiation. You eat the gamma cookie, the extreme majority of it will fly away before it can interact with the cells of your body. And finally, you throw away the neutron cookie, they have enough energy to penetrate into your body and cause harm simply by slamming the atoms in your cells."

  • @AS-yf4jr
    @AS-yf4jr 5 ปีที่แล้ว +269

    But its just 3.6 roentgn

    • @FutureMartian97
      @FutureMartian97 5 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Not great, not terrible

    • @volka2199
      @volka2199 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @Strelok COMRADE MY HAIR AND SKIN IS FALLING OFF!!

    • @coolwhip455
      @coolwhip455 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You don't see it because its not there!!!!!!!

    • @monsta1503
      @monsta1503 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      This man is delusional.

    • @samarthkambli
      @samarthkambli 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It's not 3.6, it's 15000

  • @jonatanpatino7164
    @jonatanpatino7164 7 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    Don, I love your videos. Don't ever stop making them!

  • @StanleyKowalski.
    @StanleyKowalski. 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Dr Lincoln never fails to keep me hooked on his lectures. great educator

  • @landwand
    @landwand 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I adore your dorky humour. Keep up the fantabulous work!

  • @BangMaster96
    @BangMaster96 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This was such a great video for a non-physicists who wanted to know the summary of types of radiation.
    Clear and to the point.

  • @ajmjabir1061
    @ajmjabir1061 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The Most underrated channel on youtube!
    Dr.Don Lincoln is great and should be appreciated by everyone~

  • @Lucius_Chiaraviglio
    @Lucius_Chiaraviglio 5 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Would have like to have seen positron (beta+) mentioned as well, since this is medically relevant (such as for positron emission tomography).

    • @SpotterVideo
      @SpotterVideo 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules:
      When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. (More spatial curvature). What if gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks. (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are actually a part of the quarks. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Force" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" make sense based on this concept. Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons.
      Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons.
      Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron.
      Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves.

  • @lancelot1953
    @lancelot1953 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Excellent presentation, thank you to Dr. Lincoln and the Fermi Labs for producing these videos - these are great refreshers for older engineers like me. Peace be with you, Ciao, L (FoMoCo Engineering)

  • @mbelof57
    @mbelof57 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Fantastic vídeo. Thanks for the comprehensive insight on this subject.

  • @lessacto
    @lessacto 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thank you, doctor. I’m taking a hazmat class right now and we’re on radiation. I found your explanation of the different types of radiation to be the easiest to understand so far.

  • @TM-et7wi
    @TM-et7wi 5 ปีที่แล้ว +91

    when you are the alpha radiation and have to be 20 times more dangerous to keep your status

    • @volka2199
      @volka2199 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @Strelok Not trying to fuck up the joke but the dead protective layer of your skin stops a vast majority of them so only extremely high alpha emitters in prolonged close contact can pose serious but localized harm, same thing if you inhale except you need less material because everything the Alpha particle will hit is living thus exposing you to constant damage to living tissue.

    • @user-mfsc-2024
      @user-mfsc-2024 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@volka2199 In what situation or scenario we will inhale alpha particles ?

    • @Hmuk09
      @Hmuk09 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@user-mfsc-2024 as was said in the video, radioactive dust, for example.

  • @samarthsai9530
    @samarthsai9530 7 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    We want more videos Sir. You are awesome.

  • @dhertsens5617
    @dhertsens5617 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You have a very calm and clear voice and you explain things really nicely. Thank you.

  • @stanimirivanov4052
    @stanimirivanov4052 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    God bless people like Doctor Lincoln.

  • @jimhenry6844
    @jimhenry6844 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks greatly for this video.
    I got to work with Milt Finger and Don Kennedy at the old Lawrence Livermore Labs on various ballistics and dirty bomb threats.
    We came up with new types of shielding for gamma and neutron radiation,at lower cost,weight, and less toxicity than lead.

  • @lightsidemaster
    @lightsidemaster 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    That was one of the best summaries about Radiation I have ever read or seen. Very well done!

  • @GottfriedLeibnizYT
    @GottfriedLeibnizYT 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    GREAT!
    Make a part 2 of this, please.

  • @gwyllymsuter4551
    @gwyllymsuter4551 7 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Good science communicator. keep it up

  • @pixxelwizzard
    @pixxelwizzard 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you for this well thought out video. I really enjoy how everything is put together and presented.

  • @DanceGeekRob
    @DanceGeekRob 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This has been my favorite video on this channel so far....

  • @dtmty
    @dtmty 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Totaly love the Fermilab does and answers a very nice question

  • @teenanguyen623
    @teenanguyen623 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    4:18 am and you learn something new every day 😂

  • @dpbpd
    @dpbpd 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I've worked in a nuclear power plant. I had to learn all of what was mentioned in this video, and more, before starting. Craziest job I've ever had by far. I have seen nuclear fuel rods get moved from the reactor to the spent fuel pool, and the new ones added. One of the coolest things was to see what happens when a particle moves faster than the speed of light (in the medium of water). They used a steel tube to remove the rods from the reactor, and you could see how far in the tube the rod was by the blue glow on the outside of the steel tube. It was relatively safe to work there. Per my dosimeter I only received an extra 100 mrem. For those who don't know the average person receives about 550-650 mrem a year from background radiation. On the final day of work before you could leave the facility you had to stand in a machine that checks for internal contamination. If one ate a banana during lunch that day there would be enough radiation in the potassium to set off the machine. The bad thing about that is they wont let you leave with, what has to be assumed as, their radioactive particle. Anyway, I love your videos! Keep them coming.

    • @dirty9358
      @dirty9358 ปีที่แล้ว

      Didnt knew you could work in a NPP at the age of 14

  • @johnpeterson7264
    @johnpeterson7264 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Could you talk about electromagnetics ?- some of us are amateur radio operators (Hams) and would love to hear some discussion . Perhaps some talk about antenna theory ?

    • @PawsleyDirt
      @PawsleyDirt 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      And how 5G is going to fry our brains!
      73

  • @KarbineKyle
    @KarbineKyle 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I'm guessing the sources used in order are: Americium-241, Strontium-90, Cesium-137, and Californium-252 (stored in that big polyethylene moderator). The 1st is a Ludlum model 43-92 alpha scintillation detector (Zinc Sulfide: Silver-activated). The 2nd is a gas-filled Eberline HP-210 Geiger-Muller tube. I'm not sure what the next two detectors are, but probably a beta/gamma gas-filled G-M tube and a proton recoil neutron scintillation counter.

  • @sitarnut
    @sitarnut 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dr. Don...So glad you showed Zilla...and gave a nod to the Sci-Fi comics...many of us grew up in the 1950's when we had real Science Fairs in Jr. High. Many of us read Sci-Fi comics..especially "Journey Into Space" with Adam Strange. Inside, there was always the "Scien-ti-fact" strip which explained something cool, like the aberration of Starlight. Thanks to those comics and "Mr. Wizard" we learned lot. Some of us are so daft, we're still waiting for "Gamera Rays" to be charted from our favorite Rocket Turtle. Love your presentations.. wish you had been our physics teacher in High School. Peace from TX.

  • @bbadrmoon
    @bbadrmoon 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dear Professor >>>>>>>> from middle east I send to you sincerely thanks and appreciation

  • @christopherfernandes4401
    @christopherfernandes4401 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very well explained. Easy to grasp the understanding of the different types of radiation.

  • @shadow404atl
    @shadow404atl 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Another great video. Thank you Dr. Lincoln.

  • @Spawnatron
    @Spawnatron 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm not in any classes that talk about this sort of stuff but I just wanna watch videos like these for the fun of it and learning a thing or two

  • @circeciernova1712
    @circeciernova1712 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "YOU are radioactive!"
    Dang, how did he find out about me vaping Americium

  • @markchadwick77
    @markchadwick77 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I've been looking for this explanation for some time. Thanks.

  • @AntoshaPushkin
    @AntoshaPushkin 7 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    Why are alpha particles emitted, but not single protons? How does it happen so that only two protons + two neutrons get emitted?

    • @tonytomov4553
      @tonytomov4553 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      "How does it happen so that only two protons + two neutrons get emitted?" -
      two protons + two neutrons are alpha particle. connections between nucleons IN alpha particle are more strongly than connections between alpha particles IN atom core.

    • @sidewaysfcs0718
      @sidewaysfcs0718 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      there are situations where protons can be emitted, but this is much rarer because free protons actually have a lot of free energy, alpha particles are more stable.

    • @Delfigamer1
      @Delfigamer1 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      They feel more comfortable that way, so when a nucleus wants to shed mass, it tends to do that in whole alpha particles rather than in separate protons and neutrons. By "more comfortable" meaning "there's a greater increase in entropy because less energy is left condensed in nuclei".

    • @KarbineKyle
      @KarbineKyle 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Alpha particles are quite massive and positively charged (+2). It's a much more stable mode of decay for heavier elements. Heavy elements consist of many more neutrons than protons, and alpha decay becomes the more dominant mode of decay for heavy elements.

    • @Richard-rp4bm
      @Richard-rp4bm 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think I understand your question. Since with other types of decay energy is also released, so why not this time. Well, I believe energy is released, but it's minor. . . . electromagnetic energy in the range of heat, light or radio waves, but nothing with more energy like x-rays or gamma rays.

  • @vikrantprakash3678
    @vikrantprakash3678 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    You are doing well .... please maintain it😇😇😇...

  • @thormath6991
    @thormath6991 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Watching in 2020... Corona time. And free at home. And get the best knowledge from you sir. Thank you. 😊🙏🏻🇮🇳

  • @cosmicphoto05
    @cosmicphoto05 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks so much for this clear, concise explanation!

  • @dunnokki
    @dunnokki 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    These videos are great! Informative and entertaining. And the theme song is catchy :)

  • @jorgebueno233
    @jorgebueno233 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    The greatest explanation about radiation ever!!!

  • @nojabformeeducateyourself3393
    @nojabformeeducateyourself3393 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    That is some scary stuff for sure. Thanks for explaining that in such details.

  • @fft2020
    @fft2020 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Greetings from portugal Dr. Don ! you are the coolness incarnated :) great videos and great humor!

  • @joetwicerat4521
    @joetwicerat4521 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    this is my comfort video

  • @RandyVictory420
    @RandyVictory420 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Should be required viewing in high school science classes.

  • @chemistryscuriosities
    @chemistryscuriosities 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    X-rays= Gamma's "Younger and less successful sibling". I love that analogy 👍

  • @rui2565
    @rui2565 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Professor Lincoln, I guess I am addicted to your videos

  • @Zainabz005
    @Zainabz005 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    i was shocked by the fact that alpha radioation is more dangerous than gamma and beta ! , thanks for explaining ❤️

  • @indiraupadhya4724
    @indiraupadhya4724 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very well explained sir, thank you...
    1. what is the example of neutron decay ?.. how is it used by humans?
    2. when it is said slow or fast neutrons, what is the demarkation for slow and fast ?

  • @amphibiousone7972
    @amphibiousone7972 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Simple and easy to understand. Great video.

  • @dibakarray5442
    @dibakarray5442 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    HONORS TO YOU SIR, DR DON LINCOLN AND FERMILAB.

  • @richardjanowski7219
    @richardjanowski7219 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I would have liked to see what types of shielding DON'T work against different types of radiation.
    For example, paper stops alpha rays, but see how it doesn't stop beta rays. A thin metal plate stops beta rays, but...

    • @chasedavis2358
      @chasedavis2358 ปีที่แล้ว

      Aluminum or beryllium foil will stop an alpha particle but will kick off neutrons, also alpha particles can induce fission which releases neutron and gamma

  • @akkatfiresafety8567
    @akkatfiresafety8567 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir, Your explnations are very clear and highly appreciated. Thank you sir.

  • @m.a.t.a.s
    @m.a.t.a.s 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    One of few videos, that I understood 100% But great as always :)

  • @ΔημητρηςΜπεκιαρης-μ2κ
    @ΔημητρηςΜπεκιαρης-μ2κ 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Please make a video on the observable universe and also one on the holographic universe would be great.

    • @IntraFinesse
      @IntraFinesse 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why is it a dead idea? I thought it had gained popularity a few years ago.

    • @locutusdborg126
      @locutusdborg126 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      It was a hypothesis believed by naive millennials based on The Matix movies.

    • @kindlin
      @kindlin 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      The AdS/CFT wants to have a word with you Ninja and Locutus. To quote wikipedia:
      "[The AdS/CFT correspondence] represents a major advance in our understanding of string theory and quantum gravity... and is the most successful realization of the holographic principle, ..."
      Basically, the entire formulation of the correspondence depends on the holographic principle.

  • @ZoruaZorroark
    @ZoruaZorroark 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    knew the information, still watched and also learned a few new things

  • @lmiranda8437
    @lmiranda8437 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome explanation sir! Hats off to you!

  • @EarlWallaceNYC
    @EarlWallaceNYC 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    As always: clear and concise with a cute ending. (I agree with Alex D. below)

  • @craiggodfrey639
    @craiggodfrey639 5 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    3.6 Roentgen, not great but not terrible.

    • @jamesp4521
      @jamesp4521 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No worse than a chest x-ray

    • @lyrimetacurl0
      @lyrimetacurl0 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      What about an x-ray to the knee?

    • @keepermovin5906
      @keepermovin5906 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Stay cheekie breekie

  • @Jonathan-ii3ty
    @Jonathan-ii3ty 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very interesting keep up the good work

  • @tahirsaleem123
    @tahirsaleem123 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please do a video on Medical Physics and the use of various radiations used for medical purposes (Diagnostic and Therapeutic Radiations), little bit of the role of medical physicist, and the diseases which are cured by radiation.
    What are radiopharmaceuticals ?
    What measures should one take if we have a spill of radioactive material in a hospital. Etc.

  • @johnbauerle9567
    @johnbauerle9567 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    As always, well done.

  • @rickkwitkoski1976
    @rickkwitkoski1976 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    THANK YOU! I was unaware of the Q factor. I will add that to my own 'splainers"!

  • @zubmit700
    @zubmit700 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for an informative video.
    As always great work!

  • @smartannu
    @smartannu 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love the way you are explaing things.
    I am feeling like new love for physics and science.

  • @East43359
    @East43359 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    0:42 Radiation is the emission of energy by a substance. But somebody using the toilet ... isn't nuclear radiation, right?

    • @acmefixer1
      @acmefixer1 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      East43359
      All horses have four legs, but that doesn't mean that all four legged animals are horses. Duh. 😂😂😂

    • @stargazer7644
      @stargazer7644 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@acmefixer1 I refute your assertion. Sea horses don't have 4 legs.

    • @devin3156
      @devin3156 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No it’s not nuclear radiation but it is radiation. “Radiate” means exactly what he said. Energy from one place to the next. It’s entropy at work.

  • @heliomartins6681
    @heliomartins6681 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Another great video, Doc!

  • @tresajessygeorge210
    @tresajessygeorge210 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    THANK YOU PROFESSOR LINCOLN...!!!

  • @KarbineKyle
    @KarbineKyle 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I love to study radioactivity! I have loads of sources. Uranium, Thorium, Radium-226, Strontium-90, Cesium-137, Cobalt-60, Krypton-85, Lead-210, Americium-241, Americium-241/Beryllium neutron sources, X-ray tubes, etc. It's a great subject to study! Always have a Geiger Counter and/or a scintillation counter!

    • @KarbineKyle
      @KarbineKyle 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Of course!

    • @RoboBoddicker
      @RoboBoddicker 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ScienceNinjaDude, are you telling me I should stop wearing this Cesium-137 eye shadow? But it glows so pretty!

    • @estelja
      @estelja 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You must also like being on Govt. watch lists

    • @dankole307
      @dankole307 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      KarbineKyle. You do have proper licenses. I pray. You must or the feds would be knocking. We were only able to get Promethium from Russia back 25 years. Any new sources? Been retired for a while.

    • @ErenYeager-bd5zp
      @ErenYeager-bd5zp 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Dealing

  • @ProducerX21
    @ProducerX21 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I had no idea alpha particles were more dangerous than Gamma. Thanks for the knowledge

  • @marktruong2803
    @marktruong2803 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    very comprehensive and intersting. Thanks

  • @passedhighschoolphysics6010
    @passedhighschoolphysics6010 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent video. Can you make another video explains what happens to the mass and energy in nuclear radiation? For example what happens tot he He nuclei when it hits the piece of paper or your skin. Does the paper weigh more as in the weight of a He nucleus? Do the paper now have a He atom embedded in the paper of does it bounce off after losing all of it’s energy? Does it just float away into space because it is so light>. As the He nucleus travels through the air toward the target won’t is try and grab 2 electrons and become change neutral? Or when it hits the paper target does it grab 2 electrons from the paper thus ionizing the paper?
    Please we need more videos like these. They are wonderful.

  • @Stilllife1999
    @Stilllife1999 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    "this isn't a radiation safety video."
    Thanks for the heads up.

  • @omarvela3154
    @omarvela3154 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    what radioactive source did they use for the neutron emitter at 6:08 i cant think of any isotopes that emit neutrons

  • @renatad712
    @renatad712 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    this man is goals; i love these videos, congrats to the team!

  • @MistressGlowWorm
    @MistressGlowWorm 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video and leaves me wanting to learn more!

  • @user-ct2mm8if6w
    @user-ct2mm8if6w 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    ending made me crack up haha, also well put together informative video

  • @lifeofseptic
    @lifeofseptic ปีที่แล้ว

    5:42 what material are you using here that shoots out gamma rays like that?

    • @karhukivi
      @karhukivi 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Probably Ba-133 or Cs-137, but there are lots of other sources including a piece of pitchblende mineral.

  • @1st_ProCactus
    @1st_ProCactus 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow, Good timing.
    I was wondering if it would be worth making a video on how things can be made radio active. Like the walls of a reactor.

    • @puncheex2
      @puncheex2 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      It is done by absorption of neutrons, called neutron activation. While uranium atoms absorb neutrons and the fission, other smaller nuclei also absorb neutrons and change to isotopes of their original elements. Sometimes those isotopes are radioactive, sometimes not.

  • @naggorski
    @naggorski 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Question about Gamma radiation properties: From my understanding, gamma radiation = high energy photon = EM wave. So why is it so difficult to stop? I'm thinking back to your video "why does light bend when it enters glass" and i'm thinking simply use a material with a high permittivity to stop? the EM wave

  • @dodongbalolang389
    @dodongbalolang389 ปีที่แล้ว

    @Fermilab, do you have any idea about chiral radiation?

  • @_Longwinded
    @_Longwinded ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank You 🙏

  • @arindam7demon
    @arindam7demon 5 ปีที่แล้ว +74

    HBO's Chernobyl brought me here... 😏

  • @cranjismcbasketball2118
    @cranjismcbasketball2118 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    awesome and simple as always, for us slow folk!

  • @DrRich-mw4hu
    @DrRich-mw4hu 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow!!!! Well done 👍

  • @Kingstanding23
    @Kingstanding23 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The chart at 6:33 suggests that Neutrons are the most dangerous. But what if water was at the front of the line?

  • @helicocktor
    @helicocktor 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dear Fermilab, dooo youuu remember.... ACCELERATING SCIENCE!

    • @helicocktor
      @helicocktor 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      SCIENCE!!!!!!!!!!
      PEOPLE!!!!!!!!!!!
      TECHNOLOGY

    • @helicocktor
      @helicocktor 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      dO yOu eVeR wOnDeR hOw iT aLL bEgAn
      Time
      Space
      Energy
      &
      THE BIG BANG!

  • @tomtommyl805
    @tomtommyl805 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Question: If a neutron gets stopped by hydrogen nuclei (in any kind of matrix (concrete, plastic etc). and that nuclei "knocks them out".
    First, what do you mean by "knock them out". Out of what? (since the hydrogen nuclei is just a proton. or a deuterium nuclei.)Next question: why wouldn't the neutron hit any other kind of nucleus ??
    ..
    Doc: Thanks for a great video! this was cool !

  • @andreranulfo-dev8607
    @andreranulfo-dev8607 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Man How I love these videos!

  • @VapidSlug
    @VapidSlug 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have a conceptual question. In space, alpha particles are so high energy they can go straight through thick shielding. Theoretically, if we are eventually able to achieve light-speed, we would then become the fast moving thing colliding with stationary particles. If we traveled through a helium cloud at light speed, our DNA and other cell structures would be shredded. A stationary helium cloud would become alpha particles relative to the fast moving human--how much shielding would be required to survive? How many other molecules then become ionizing and penetrate shielding at light speed?

  • @BobDiaz123
    @BobDiaz123 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    So I assume that a high level exposure of Alpha radiation would damage the skin and a little under the skin. Correct???

    • @Jesusisyhwh
      @Jesusisyhwh 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Well, think about it like a bullet. A bullet thrown at you by someone might give you a bruise, but you are unlikely to die. A bullet fired by a rifle can blow a hole through you and the person behind you. It depends on the kinetic energy of the bullet and the alpha particle.

    • @mitchelllanahan2651
      @mitchelllanahan2651 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      depends on energy and time.

  • @chemistryscuriosities
    @chemistryscuriosities 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What was your neutron source just out of curiosity? Was it an assembly utilizing the Alpha N reaction, using a sufficient alpha emitter and Beryllium? I know you need at least something like 5.4 mCi, (I think) to have enough energy to overcome Beryllium's nuclear bond energies to knock off a Neutron. No?

  • @anothershowcaser
    @anothershowcaser 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    this was very helpful, I have recently been doing research on radiation.

  • @feelingzhakkaas
    @feelingzhakkaas 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks for the Very nice and informative video.
    Q : In our daily life how much Alpha radiation we receive from common objects around us? is it dangerous in long term?

    • @hadrianopolis1968
      @hadrianopolis1968 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Where I live, the vast majority of houses have a basement which tends to accumulate Radon 222. Radon decays through a series of metallic radio-isotopes (Polonium 218 and Po 214). Those isotopes are Alpha emitters and fixate on dust and contaminate the lungs and can cause lung cancer on long term. I had such a problem in my home and had to mitigate.

    • @stargazer7644
      @stargazer7644 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Radon is the biggie because its a gas and you can inhale it. Alpha radiation is stopped by just about everything, including a few inches of air. So long as you keep it outside of your body, alphas aren't of much concern.

  • @24hourgmtchannel64
    @24hourgmtchannel64 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I restore vintage wrist watches and given its half life of 12.5 years, most have dead tritium paint that no longer visibly glows unless in pitch dark and after your eyes adjust you can still see a faint glow in most 90's tritium paint watches. As a separate interest from Horology, I have become fascinated with the study of radio luminescence. In trying to legally (tritium salts can no longer be obtained) duplicate zinc sulfide tritium luminescent paint I am wondering if one can still create a mixture similar to old tritium paint (not current gas tubes) with zinc Sulfide and some low level radioactive emitter salts in fine powder form that has glow like old tritium paint did when new.