They were state of the art then too. It was peak design during their time, but the needs of teams and the fans changed. Just how it goes, and it'll happen again.
*Why do all new stadiums have roofs? They are turning all stadiums into indoor arenas. Into halls. Football is an outdoor sport and stadiums are supposed to be outdoor arenas. When you play football you want to be playing outside in the fresh air not indoors in a hall. You need the air and oxygen to feel lively. It also keeps you cool.* *I dislike roofs on stadiums. They are doing the same thing to soccer stadiums in Europe. They are turning iconic soccer stadiums into indoor arenas.* *It doesn't feel the same anymore with roofs. When the crowd chants, it feels like they are indoors and in a hall, because they actually are. It doesn't feel like football or soccer anymore. It ruins it.* *At least the roofs are transparent in the USA, so it lets in natural light. In the Santiago Bernabeu stadium in Madrid, Spain. The roof is not transparent. It blocks all the natural light. They have ruined that stadium. It was my favourite stadium.* *at least make the roofs retractable to let in fresh air so you can still play with the roof open.*
Yup it’s stupid and it’s one of the only things that baseball has over other sports, iconic ballparks and the only teams that have roofs actually needs them because it’s eaither to hot or too cold there for a majority of the season
Because they also want to have the stadium and the city to be able to host a NCAA college basketball final 4, big rodeos, biger concerts without worrying about whether delay and a Super Bowl. And basically the only way a city can host a Super Bowl that doesn't have nice weather to play outdoors like California and Florida is unless they do have a indoor stadium. Remember they're making these stadiums multi-use all year round besides just football.
@@bushgreen260 NFL have a rule ,i forgot the time limit.If the roof is open before a certain time to start of the game it remains open even if a blizzard starts
I still can not wrap my head around the idea of the Chicago bears playing their home games at a dome stadium on artificial turf. For certain teams I feel like playing in the outdoors and in the elements is in their DNA. The Chicago bears are one of those teams that should always be playing home games outdoors...
It's American Football. They don't give a damn about history. It's always about greed and money. The NFL is the most slimeball sport organization in the world after FIFA and the Olympics. All that matters is money. Not history. Not the fans. Not even the pieces of metal they give to owners at the end of the Super Bowl. Pro sports is a BUSINESS.
I think fans won’t give a damn about any of this really. It’s only so much you can do without mimicking something else. US Bank Stadium is the best in the league and that’s coming from a Bears fan.
I want more retractable roofs. I get that they’re more expensive but at least they allow for actual outside football. Hoping the Commanders or Browns consider a retractable roof.
The chance that Chicago gets a new stadium is basically nil. The park district, and friends of the park, both are opposed to anything being built there. Parking is bad enough, even for the off season for the museums. Parking on game days is a nightmare already. The museums need most of the parking that is there now.
@@thephantomeagle2 Another thing I don't understand is why people refer to the current Soldier Field as a "renovation." It is not. They tore down the old stadium and totally replaced it. The only part left is the columns.
My favorite stadium is rogers place in edmonton. Was watching hockey there the other day and man is it an amazing experience. I like the open bars to go chill with friends for drinks during the period. It has such a well thought out design. Ever seat in the venue is a good view
Crazy to think now that in terms of the NFC north, that once Chicago has their new stadium, Green Bay will be the only team in that division that doesn’t have a domed stadium
I think the cool feature about the last few stadiums was the scoreboard. Each one had a different, unique main scoreboard. It looks like the new Bears stadium has a typical rectangle scoreboard. We need more crazy scoreboard designs.
Parts of the NFL season takes place during the cold months, with the playoffs taking place throughout January, so it does make sense for the NFL stadiums that are located in cold weather cities to be indoors.
Also, since when has football become a game that should be played indoors?? I know there have always been some teams that have always played indoors, (ATL,NO,DE, IND,) but it seems like every new NFL stadium getting built Now are all indoors?? Wtf is up with that?? Football is supposed to be played outdoors in the elements. Cleveland, Chicago, Tennessee, all moving indoors. Tarrable
Now, all of those might not happen. Chicago wanted a dome stadium for both the Bears and the White Sox in the 80s and instead ended up with Guaranteed Rate Field and Post-2002 Soldier Field. Whole idea is making money and hosting year round events. I could see the logic in it. Stadiums are already super expensive, even w/o a dome. Best to build a year-round venue so that it has the ability to host all kinds of events, regardless of the weather. That'll help make money back and generate revenue. Especially if their is some type of public assistance to building the stadium.
Why should we as taxpayers pay for a multipurpose stadium when these owners make millions of dollars? Seems to me like they should put down 100% of the cost.
@@Mrcharles. Because it's a public private partnership. The owners aren't your parents giving you a Christmas present. They're making something that will be used by the entire region for things that won't have anything to do with the NFL (concerts, political conventions, etc.). I understand it's super expensive, but this is something big league cities do. As long as it's not extremely onerous on the taxpayers, I'm like why not? Mentality of telling them they should pay for it themselves is going to send the Bears across stateliness into Northern Indiana, where the statehouse would be happy to have them.
That's a good point! The Raiders, Bears, and Titans owners don't have the same net worth as Arthur Blank or Stan Kroenke, so it would make since that they would look for something that could be both nice and cost effective.
One thing I worry about that could be an unintentional consequence... IF the vast majority of NFL teams have indoor stadiums, wouldn't that potentially lead to the vast majority of future Super Bowl winning teams being from mostly outdoors? Historically, almost all of the good NFL teams have been from inclement weather areas. Weather has been a factor, particularly if they're cold weather teams, in having a home-field advantage in the playoffs. We could have a future w/ most of these stadiums being indoors, but Green Bay, Buffalo, Kansas City (if they're still outdoors), Cincinnati, Pittsburgh, Baltimore, potentially Seattle, and a good number of the warm weather teams that still play outdoors or in a canopy stadium, winning all of the Super Bowls.
NFL is probably fixed anyway with it's inconsistent rules and arbitrary referring where one play can influence an entire game outcome. So who cares? The majority of the globe doesn't.
@@29Texan They are bland and uninteresting. Indoor or outdoor. Baseball stadiums have different dimensions and distinctive features. If you seen one outdoor Padded Rugby, excuse me, American Football stadium you basically seen them all. If you seen one indoor American Football stadium you basically seen them all too.
@@HoshizakiYoshimasa wow. Ignorant AND snobbish. I knew I'd get at least one of those. I don't think you need to explain to me how baseball dimensions work. But saying ALL indoor or retractable roof NFL stadiums look the same is false. You're taking from 3 renderings of stadiums that haven't even broken ground yet. Chances are, they change before the final design.
Besides domes, all nfl stadiums are going to have real grass, or at least that is what the players want. That's a big expense to have real grass fields at every nfl stadium.
I still think Buffalo should host Super Bowl LXII (2028), Nashville should host Super Bowl LXIII (2029), Chicago should host Super Bowl LXIV (2030) and Jacksonville should host Super Bowl LXV (2031)
They look like a cross between SoFi and Allegiant honestly. And considering that the two are the most expensive and state-of-the-art venues, it's no wonder other NHL teams want to hop on the bandwagon.
I wonder if any teams will look at these new stadiums and price tags and decide to go with a major renovation like Hard Rock stadium? Frankly HR doesn't look that bad in comparison to the modern cookie cutters -from the inside anyway.
I honestly kinda hate the new mega stadiums, I prefer unique stadiums that can actually hold history like Lambeau, these new mega ones feel so corporate
blame the dallas cowboys. they all follow the same internal pattern ESPECIALLY sofi stadium. the only difference between cowboys stadum and these new ones are the translusent roof.
I want a stadium with a bunch of LED ribbon boards and a lot of big screens that show the action on the field. They need to take a page out of WWE’s production and replicate that for a stadium.
The biggest disappointment for me, is if the Buccaneers decide they want a new stadium, and it gets another copy and paste. The ship made the raymond james unique and its going to last longer then its sister stadium Nissan.
I have a hunch that the Bucs will do what the Jags did. So, RayJay will still exist, just with a canopy and an updated plush interior...with the pirate ship still there!
@@maxkeebs4425 Best cast scenario... But you never know, owners can be dirty. Nissan stadium was made by the same people who did raymond james, and they said they would need billions to make it structually safe, (which i do NOT believe at all) Hope that it just gets a canopy, maybe a nicer exterior, realisticly better club seats.
I don’t understand this criticism. Nobody goes to a game and thinks “the inside of this stadium is unique!” They care about their seat, the amenities and the view. And if those are good, literally nothing else matters.
With all due respect, this has been one of the MLB's greatest strengths for generations. It's harder to do that with NFL, NBA, and NHL stadiums. But, as AT&T in Dallas first showed, it can be done.
who cares about NFL stadiums.. Make the teams build them... for 8-9 games /year... Taxpayers should NEVER build it.. Not enough $$$$ in return for a mere 9 games... MLB, NBA or NHL... much better return and the latter two are arenas that are great for both and concerts.
This is what happens when stadiums are designed to maximise revenue rather than fan experience. These new ones are built with luxury suites prioritised
Taxpayers getting their money's worth by hosting a greater variety of events year round is more important than Padded Rugby fans and their 10 home games a year
? It's the only one with anything unique about it, it has a seating bowl in the second and third deck that is fully wrap around and the wrap around video board. And it's by far one of the most unique exteriors not only in the league but in the entire world with that square design. Meanwhile Chicago is literally allegiant 2.0. with more suites making the second seating bowl smaller but that's the only change pretty much and on the outside they copied the Titans by adding a useless balcony. Titans balcony is supposed to be open year around as a public space and a bar to fit in with all the rooftop bars they have in Nashville ( being unique to the city). Bears one is just there. nothing on that building's renders are a new thought at all. But I will admit all 3 do look too similar on the inside
Well, its a stadium its a place of abode for the teams, performers and there fans, plus the are not domes they are flat roofs with translucent ceilings, I would like to see a sunroof which would let in enough natural light to grow grass which could use anti glare technology like they do on sunglasses
If taxpayers are paying for these facilities that cost billions upon billions of dollars, might as well get your money's worth by hosting a variety of events besides 10 Padded Rugby home games a year. Roofs make that possible.
THIS IS WHY I DONT KNOW WHAT THEY ARE THINKING BUILDING ANOTHER OPEN AIR STADIUM IN BUFFALO. THIS IS THE LICK. THIS IS WHAT U BUILD IF YOU WANNA HOST A SUPERBOWL AND OR HOST EVENTS YEAR ROUND. THESE NEW AND FUTURE STADIUMS IS WHAT U GET BUILT. ANOTHER “OPEN AIR” HIGHMARK STADIUM? THEY ARE LEAVING MONEY ON THE TABLE IN BUFFALO.
I don't know. The Super Bowl used to be played in the South (Miami or New Orleans) or in college football stadiums. When everyone has the same thing, what value does each individual city have?
If taxpayers and cities are paying for these billion dollar facilities, they might as well get their money's worth by hosting a variety of events besides 10 Padded Rugby home games a year. Roofs make that possible.
But how creative can you get? At some point things will eventually start looking similar, there has to some sort of ceiling in stadium design for the interior. I believe you can be far more creative with the exterior vs the interior, but you probably can only go so far with the interior. As long as the exterior stands out, then that's all you can really expect.
I think you can reflect the team more in the interior. Atlanta did a great job of this in their stadium (one of the end zone seating areas looks like the wing of a falcon). You can also place the upper suites closer to the field, and have all the suites and club seating at field level, and the rest of the seats above the suites going into the rafters. Floating sections is also a cool idea, too.
@@MentorlZoryea MetLife was regarded as a very modern and great stadium when it opened but it's aged like milk. It was supposed to have a canopy too (making it even more like SoFi) but I think they held off due to the cost. Besides the roof and the round screen (which won't be state of the art in 10 years) it's just another stadium.
If taxpayers are paying for these billion dollar facilities that only are used for 10 home games, they might as well get their money's worth by hosting a variety of events besides American Football. Roofs make that more possible
The problem is manica, they designed all three of these stadiums and they are just too lazy to think outside of the box on the inside and then they just copy unique features like Nashville's bar/balcony that fits the city of Nashville with all the rooftop bars( that they specifically asked for so it can be the stadium of Nashville), like why the hell does bears stadium have the same damn thing on the sides. Nashville has it for a reason, bears just have it. It's all manica's fault. Like HKS designed sofi, us bank, Lucas oil and at@t stadium other than all 4 being domes they all look nothing alike and all are unique. I hope manica doesn't get picked anymore in the future.
I'm not sure why their interiors are similar. My guess is that Manica think this works the best for ingress/egress and viewing. While HKS is great, I personally am partial to HOK and Populous. Populous is doing the new Bills stadium (also did State Farm Stadium). HOK is doing the Jags and they did Mercedes-Benz Stadium. Populous does a great job of building a nice looking facility that feels both practical to its market, fits its market, and making a stadium that's primary function is sports. HOK is able to build stadiums that are both beautiful and unique, like HKS, but also like practical to the city's metro area, like Populous. HOK's stadium interiors also usually have some type of diversity compared to the other firms.
@@maxkeebs4425 I loved what hok did in Atlanta especially considering it was their first ultra modern stadium they did. They have some nice designs. Yea I don't know what manica are thinking but it starts to look basic. They can at least change the roof design to be different
@@Donster2 Manica also designed the Chargers desired downtown stadium when they were in San Diego. It wasn't built, obviously, but if you look at the design, it looks very similar to these other stadiums, too. The only thing that is different is it was outdoors with a retractable roof.
I can see a future within the next 30 or 50 years. 80% of more Stadiums will have a dome roofs. which i don't have a issue with them. If i live in a state that has NFL team. i would love to have a dome roof at the stadiums
![Abandoned NBA Arena Where Lebron Made His Debut [Part 3]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ptQgTG6Wno4/mqdefault.jpg)
![Abandoned NBA Arena Where Lebron Made His Debut [Part 3]](/img/tr.png)
Turn down the unnecessary background music.
Interesting how this same thing happened in the 70’s with the famous “cookie cutter” stadium era.
That’s exactly what’s happening now!! The modern day version of cookie cutter stadiums
You beat me to it...this trend reminds me way too much of the circular multi-use stadiums built in the 70s.
They were state of the art then too. It was peak design during their time, but the needs of teams and the fans changed. Just how it goes, and it'll happen again.
I was thinking the same thing. Phil, Cin and some of the others were all generally the same. At least MLB has gotten away from that trend.
I thought the exact same thing. Also, the indoor stadiums with the inflatable roofs.
Why is this dude all the sudden putting shitty music in his vids????
For the culture
Because people are falling asleep watching his channel.
@@marblox9300I do put these videos on right before falling asleep. It's interesting and calming
*Why do all new stadiums have roofs? They are turning all stadiums into indoor arenas. Into halls. Football is an outdoor sport and stadiums are supposed to be outdoor arenas. When you play football you want to be playing outside in the fresh air not indoors in a hall. You need the air and oxygen to feel lively. It also keeps you cool.*
*I dislike roofs on stadiums. They are doing the same thing to soccer stadiums in Europe. They are turning iconic soccer stadiums into indoor arenas.*
*It doesn't feel the same anymore with roofs. When the crowd chants, it feels like they are indoors and in a hall, because they actually are. It doesn't feel like football or soccer anymore. It ruins it.*
*At least the roofs are transparent in the USA, so it lets in natural light. In the Santiago Bernabeu stadium in Madrid, Spain. The roof is not transparent. It blocks all the natural light. They have ruined that stadium. It was my favourite stadium.*
*at least make the roofs retractable to let in fresh air so you can still play with the roof open.*
Yup it’s stupid and it’s one of the only things that baseball has over other sports, iconic ballparks and the only teams that have roofs actually needs them because it’s eaither to hot or too cold there for a majority of the season
Because they also want to have the stadium and the city to be able to host a NCAA college basketball final 4, big rodeos, biger concerts without worrying about whether delay and a Super Bowl. And basically the only way a city can host a Super Bowl that doesn't have nice weather to play outdoors like California and Florida is unless they do have a indoor stadium. Remember they're making these stadiums multi-use all year round besides just football.
@@lucasjames5187 *at least make the roofs retractable to let in fresh air so you can still play with the roof open.*
@@bushgreen260 Oh I agree. But building a stadium with a retractable roof would be even more expensive.
@@bushgreen260 NFL have a rule ,i forgot the time limit.If the roof is open before a certain time to start of the game it remains open even if a blizzard starts
I still can not wrap my head around the idea of the Chicago bears playing their home games at a dome stadium on artificial turf. For certain teams I feel like playing in the outdoors and in the elements is in their DNA. The Chicago bears are one of those teams that should always be playing home games outdoors...
It's American Football. They don't give a damn about history. It's always about greed and money. The NFL is the most slimeball sport organization in the world after FIFA and the Olympics. All that matters is money. Not history. Not the fans. Not even the pieces of metal they give to owners at the end of the Super Bowl. Pro sports is a BUSINESS.
I think fans won’t give a damn about any of this really. It’s only so much you can do without mimicking something else. US Bank Stadium is the best in the league and that’s coming from a Bears fan.
I want more retractable roofs. I get that they’re more expensive but at least they allow for actual outside football. Hoping the Commanders or Browns consider a retractable roof.
They are hardly ever open. Not worth the expense.
Good - you pay the extra money for them.
I’d rather have a football stadium be outside instead of inside. Sometimes going to a game with the elements is actually fun.
@@Mrcharles. I was once at a Bears Game at night. It was SOOOO freaking Cold.
The chance that Chicago gets a new stadium is basically nil. The park district, and friends of the park, both are opposed to anything being built there. Parking is bad enough, even for the off season for the museums. Parking on game days is a nightmare already. The museums need most of the parking that is there now.
They don't need a new stadium.
@@davidlafleche1142 yeah, but they’ve had so many new “plans” over the decades, it’s hard to get excited.
@@thephantomeagle2 Another thing I don't understand is why people refer to the current Soldier Field as a "renovation." It is not. They tore down the old stadium and totally replaced it. The only part left is the columns.
@@davidlafleche1142 very sad.
This was how domed stadia was built 40 years ago with the inflatable domes.
My favorite stadium is rogers place in edmonton. Was watching hockey there the other day and man is it an amazing experience. I like the open bars to go chill with friends for drinks during the period. It has such a well thought out design. Ever seat in the venue is a good view
Everybody Want to Have a Super Bowl Stadium, Welcome to the 21st Century? Show Me the Money, Duh?
Crazy to think now that in terms of the NFC north, that once Chicago has their new stadium, Green Bay will be the only team in that division that doesn’t have a domed stadium
Which is great for me because I know how much Packers fans hate domes.
@@dvferyanceI don't know much about Padded Rugby. But it seems those fans hate being sober as well.
Thoughts on Ford Field? Unique design.
Been there for a few Vikings vs lions games love that stadium
Rfk ,busch stadium and veterans stadium are similar. It's the sign of The Times the era
Yeah, Three Rivers, Riverfront Stadium, and the old Fulton County Stadium all fit that mold too
The Cookie cutter stadiums are BACK!
No. Stadiums giving taxpayers their money's worth by hosting a variety of events besides 10 Padded Rugby home games is back
I like the trend. They are beautiful and they have natural light which give the stadium an outside feel without the elements affecting them
I think the cool feature about the last few stadiums was the scoreboard. Each one had a different, unique main scoreboard. It looks like the new Bears stadium has a typical rectangle scoreboard. We need more crazy scoreboard designs.
Parts of the NFL season takes place during the cold months, with the playoffs taking place throughout January, so it does make sense for the NFL stadiums that are located in cold weather cities to be indoors.
Tell that to Green Bay or New England or Kansas City or Pittsburgh...
@@TJR93Chiefs wanna build a new domed stadium as well. Guess their fans couldn’t handle the cold against Miami.
I would like to see a stadium design that you personally come up with and make a video about it
Also, since when has football become a game that should be played indoors?? I know there have always been some teams that have always played indoors, (ATL,NO,DE, IND,) but it seems like every new NFL stadium getting built Now are all indoors?? Wtf is up with that?? Football is supposed to be played outdoors in the elements. Cleveland, Chicago, Tennessee, all moving indoors. Tarrable
Now, all of those might not happen. Chicago wanted a dome stadium for both the Bears and the White Sox in the 80s and instead ended up with Guaranteed Rate Field and Post-2002 Soldier Field.
Whole idea is making money and hosting year round events. I could see the logic in it. Stadiums are already super expensive, even w/o a dome. Best to build a year-round venue so that it has the ability to host all kinds of events, regardless of the weather. That'll help make money back and generate revenue. Especially if their is some type of public assistance to building the stadium.
Why should we as taxpayers pay for a multipurpose stadium when these owners make millions of dollars? Seems to me like they should put down 100% of the cost.
@@Mrcharles. Because it's a public private partnership. The owners aren't your parents giving you a Christmas present. They're making something that will be used by the entire region for things that won't have anything to do with the NFL (concerts, political conventions, etc.).
I understand it's super expensive, but this is something big league cities do. As long as it's not extremely onerous on the taxpayers, I'm like why not? Mentality of telling them they should pay for it themselves is going to send the Bears across stateliness into Northern Indiana, where the statehouse would be happy to have them.
Developers use similar designs to control costs. Wealthier owners get to go crazy.
That's a good point! The Raiders, Bears, and Titans owners don't have the same net worth as Arthur Blank or Stan Kroenke, so it would make since that they would look for something that could be both nice and cost effective.
It’s like the Concrete Doughnut Stadiums, Attack of the Clones.😂
The Little Caesars Arena In Detroit Might Have A Roof Than The Next NFL Stadiums Out There , Nowadays!
One thing I worry about that could be an unintentional consequence...
IF the vast majority of NFL teams have indoor stadiums, wouldn't that potentially lead to the vast majority of future Super Bowl winning teams being from mostly outdoors? Historically, almost all of the good NFL teams have been from inclement weather areas. Weather has been a factor, particularly if they're cold weather teams, in having a home-field advantage in the playoffs. We could have a future w/ most of these stadiums being indoors, but Green Bay, Buffalo, Kansas City (if they're still outdoors), Cincinnati, Pittsburgh, Baltimore, potentially Seattle, and a good number of the warm weather teams that still play outdoors or in a canopy stadium, winning all of the Super Bowls.
NFL is probably fixed anyway with it's inconsistent rules and arbitrary referring where one play can influence an entire game outcome. So who cares? The majority of the globe doesn't.
With the music added, I can tap my toe while I listen to you talk!
LETS GO BEARS NEW STADIUM 💙🧡⬇️🏈🐻💯
You should talk about the “entertainment district” part of stadium development
I'm terrified of these collapsing. 😨 I don't think that I'll ever go to one. 😢
nfl stadiums are so trash compared to baseball stadiums
"Trash" is a very odd choice of words...
@@29Texan They are bland and uninteresting. Indoor or outdoor. Baseball stadiums have different dimensions and distinctive features. If you seen one outdoor Padded Rugby, excuse me, American Football stadium you basically seen them all. If you seen one indoor American Football stadium you basically seen them all too.
@@HoshizakiYoshimasa wow. Ignorant AND snobbish. I knew I'd get at least one of those.
I don't think you need to explain to me how baseball dimensions work. But saying ALL indoor or retractable roof NFL stadiums look the same is false.
You're taking from 3 renderings of stadiums that haven't even broken ground yet. Chances are, they change before the final design.
mlb has the best cathedrals out of any sport
This is why Lambeau Field is and will forever be the best stadium of all time in the NFL.
Stadium only used for 10 padded Rugby games a year, during awful US Midwest winter weather, and can't host Final Fours or WrestleManias.
I’m okay with that.
I dont like the closed roof trend.
Same.
The new era of cookie cutter stadiums.
Besides domes, all nfl stadiums are going to have real grass, or at least that is what the players want. That's a big expense to have real grass fields at every nfl stadium.
As a jets fan I’d kill for one of these cookie cutter new stadiums, MetLife is a shit heap waste of money
I still think Buffalo should host Super Bowl LXII (2028), Nashville should host Super Bowl LXIII (2029), Chicago should host Super Bowl LXIV (2030) and Jacksonville should host Super Bowl LXV (2031)
The Browns, Commanders etc should just avoid hiring Manica Architecture.
As a Commanders fan, any stadium will be better than Fed Ex.
They all want super bowls…plain and simple.
They look like a cross between SoFi and Allegiant honestly. And considering that the two are the most expensive and state-of-the-art venues, it's no wonder other NHL teams want to hop on the bandwagon.
Anything is better the the old stadium
I wonder if any teams will look at these new stadiums and price tags and decide to go with a major renovation like Hard Rock stadium? Frankly HR doesn't look that bad in comparison to the modern cookie cutters -from the inside anyway.
Music is too high in the mix. It distracts from the video’s message.
I honestly kinda hate the new mega stadiums, I prefer unique stadiums that can actually hold history like Lambeau, these new mega ones feel so corporate
blame the dallas cowboys. they all follow the same internal pattern ESPECIALLY sofi stadium. the only difference between cowboys stadum and these new ones are the translusent roof.
it would be nice if you could do a breakdown of where the money came from for SoFi Stadium
Does anyone remember the days when nfl teams shared a stadium with mlb teams (those stadiums were known as multi-purpose stadiums)?
I want a stadium with a bunch of LED ribbon boards and a lot of big screens that show the action on the field. They need to take a page out of WWE’s production and replicate that for a stadium.
How would that look, though? It sounds novel, but placing the seats in certain areas is key.
At least buffalo didn't follow this trend.
Or the packers, 49ers, Steelers and ravens. Hopefully it doesn’t happen to Tampa but I could see it happen there as well.
@Mrcharles. unfortunately it happened it happened to my titans
The biggest disappointment for me, is if the Buccaneers decide they want a new stadium, and it gets another copy and paste.
The ship made the raymond james unique and its going to last longer then its sister stadium Nissan.
I have a hunch that the Bucs will do what the Jags did. So, RayJay will still exist, just with a canopy and an updated plush interior...with the pirate ship still there!
@@maxkeebs4425 Best cast scenario...
But you never know, owners can be dirty.
Nissan stadium was made by the same people who did raymond james, and they said they would need billions to make it structually safe, (which i do NOT believe at all)
Hope that it just gets a canopy, maybe a nicer exterior, realisticly better club seats.
I don’t like this one bit. I like when there is innovation.
Music is annoying
I don’t understand this criticism. Nobody goes to a game and thinks “the inside of this stadium is unique!” They care about their seat, the amenities and the view. And if those are good, literally nothing else matters.
With all due respect, this has been one of the MLB's greatest strengths for generations.
It's harder to do that with NFL, NBA, and NHL stadiums. But, as AT&T in Dallas first showed, it can be done.
Why not just make it outdoors lol
Because cold weather areas outdoors stadiums can't host Final Fours or Superbowls.
Firework shows and flyovers may be a problem for games that are played in dome stadium.
.... So?
Taxpayers get their money's worth by having stadiums host a variety of events year round. Especially in cold weather areas..
NFL teams want a new stadium every five years now it’s getting ridiculous
Kinda like madden selection options for new stadiums
who cares about NFL stadiums.. Make the teams build them... for 8-9 games /year... Taxpayers should NEVER build it.. Not enough $$$$ in return for a mere 9 games... MLB, NBA or NHL... much better return and the latter two are arenas that are great for both and concerts.
This is what happens when stadiums are designed to maximise revenue rather than fan experience. These new ones are built with luxury suites prioritised
Taxpayers getting their money's worth by hosting a greater variety of events year round is more important than Padded Rugby fans and their 10 home games a year
@@HoshizakiYoshimasa I can assure you these stadiums aren’t designed to benefit the taxpayers…
The bears stadium renderings and allegiant stadium look unique enough, the Titans stadium renderings is the only one that looks bland imo
? It's the only one with anything unique about it, it has a seating bowl in the second and third deck that is fully wrap around and the wrap around video board. And it's by far one of the most unique exteriors not only in the league but in the entire world with that square design. Meanwhile Chicago is literally allegiant 2.0. with more suites making the second seating bowl smaller but that's the only change pretty much and on the outside they copied the Titans by adding a useless balcony. Titans balcony is supposed to be open year around as a public space and a bar to fit in with all the rooftop bars they have in Nashville ( being unique to the city). Bears one is just there. nothing on that building's renders are a new thought at all. But I will admit all 3 do look too similar on the inside
Its a giant oval sloped inwards with 40,000 chairs attached to it. How much variation do you expect out of it?
I don't know if you noticed, but the Bears stadium has the C logo on the roof of it
The music is a bit much lol
Well, its a stadium its a place of abode for the teams, performers and there fans, plus the are not domes they are flat roofs with translucent ceilings, I would like to see a sunroof which would let in enough natural light to grow grass which could use anti glare technology like they do on sunglasses
Yeah nothing unique or different. This is 2024 teams should be coming out with a variety of unique designs to there stadiums smh
I hate this trend. I want to see football in football weather.
If taxpayers are paying for these facilities that cost billions upon billions of dollars, might as well get your money's worth by hosting a variety of events besides 10 Padded Rugby home games a year. Roofs make that possible.
nice
Don't Forget Dallas Cowboys "AT & T Stadium "Jerry's World"
Only thing missing in bears new stadium the AL Davis torch.
THIS IS WHY I DONT KNOW WHAT THEY ARE THINKING BUILDING ANOTHER OPEN AIR STADIUM IN BUFFALO. THIS IS THE LICK. THIS IS WHAT U BUILD IF YOU WANNA HOST A SUPERBOWL AND OR HOST EVENTS YEAR ROUND. THESE NEW AND FUTURE STADIUMS IS WHAT U GET BUILT. ANOTHER “OPEN AIR” HIGHMARK STADIUM? THEY ARE LEAVING MONEY ON THE TABLE IN BUFFALO.
can you not put backround music? It's way too distracting and loud
It sucks NFL football is moving 100% indoors. No wonder the running back is a dying breed... Rip full backs I remember you..
NFL is a one player league. Has been for about twenty-five years. I am not saying I like that, but that is how it is.
I don’t care for the background music on the video.
How lucrative will these super bowl hosting stadiums be once everyone has one?
I don't know. The Super Bowl used to be played in the South (Miami or New Orleans) or in college football stadiums. When everyone has the same thing, what value does each individual city have?
Green Bay will never host one.
What if you got rid of the middle deck in the endzones and had a window and the upper and lower decks went all the way around instead?
Loud ass music, I picked up I think 3 words in this video.
You're killing me with the mispronunciation of Jaguars.
The NFL and it's fans are soft. Domes were terrible. Translucent roofs are terrible. Football should be played outside.
If taxpayers and cities are paying for these billion dollar facilities, they might as well get their money's worth by hosting a variety of events besides 10 Padded Rugby home games a year. Roofs make that possible.
@@HoshizakiYoshimasa I was unaware that it was impossible to hold concerts, monster truck events, and other sporting events outdoors.
If it looks good, who the hell cares if it looks the same as something else
But how creative can you get? At some point things will eventually start looking similar, there has to some sort of ceiling in stadium design for the interior. I believe you can be far more creative with the exterior vs the interior, but you probably can only go so far with the interior. As long as the exterior stands out, then that's all you can really expect.
I think you can reflect the team more in the interior. Atlanta did a great job of this in their stadium (one of the end zone seating areas looks like the wing of a falcon). You can also place the upper suites closer to the field, and have all the suites and club seating at field level, and the rest of the seats above the suites going into the rafters.
Floating sections is also a cool idea, too.
@@maxkeebs4425 That's true.
That background music hurts my ear. Turn it off.
SoFi is going to age like MetLife Stadium. Come back to this comment in 10 years.
Will do but elaborate what you mean
@@MentorlZoryea MetLife was regarded as a very modern and great stadium when it opened but it's aged like milk. It was supposed to have a canopy too (making it even more like SoFi) but I think they held off due to the cost. Besides the roof and the round screen (which won't be state of the art in 10 years) it's just another stadium.
SoFi was build by the same firm that made AT&T Stadium. AT&T is still heralded, and it's like 15 years old.
@@maxkeebs4425 AT&T is a much better design than SoFi. It'll probably end up being a future classic venue being the first super stadium and all.
@@91_C4_FL Curious, why do you think the design is better?
Depressed Ginger, you're an exceptional commentator... please do away with the irritating background music.
Please lower the music. By a lot
Please get the music out of the videos. I liked the old style bro
Fuck those roofs. It should be limited to one team a division with permanent roofes
If taxpayers are paying for these billion dollar facilities that only are used for 10 home games, they might as well get their money's worth by hosting a variety of events besides American Football. Roofs make that more possible
The problem is manica, they designed all three of these stadiums and they are just too lazy to think outside of the box on the inside and then they just copy unique features like Nashville's bar/balcony that fits the city of Nashville with all the rooftop bars( that they specifically asked for so it can be the stadium of Nashville), like why the hell does bears stadium have the same damn thing on the sides. Nashville has it for a reason, bears just have it. It's all manica's fault. Like HKS designed sofi, us bank, Lucas oil and at@t stadium other than all 4 being domes they all look nothing alike and all are unique. I hope manica doesn't get picked anymore in the future.
I'm not sure why their interiors are similar. My guess is that Manica think this works the best for ingress/egress and viewing.
While HKS is great, I personally am partial to HOK and Populous. Populous is doing the new Bills stadium (also did State Farm Stadium). HOK is doing the Jags and they did Mercedes-Benz Stadium. Populous does a great job of building a nice looking facility that feels both practical to its market, fits its market, and making a stadium that's primary function is sports. HOK is able to build stadiums that are both beautiful and unique, like HKS, but also like practical to the city's metro area, like Populous. HOK's stadium interiors also usually have some type of diversity compared to the other firms.
@@maxkeebs4425 I loved what hok did in Atlanta especially considering it was their first ultra modern stadium they did. They have some nice designs. Yea I don't know what manica are thinking but it starts to look basic. They can at least change the roof design to be different
@@Donster2 Manica also designed the Chargers desired downtown stadium when they were in San Diego. It wasn't built, obviously, but if you look at the design, it looks very similar to these other stadiums, too. The only thing that is different is it was outdoors with a retractable roof.
Don’t lump the Raiders into this, it’s not their fault other teams want to copy them
Nothing is unique anymore.
Everything is gentrified and made to look the same.
Damn :(
THE MUSIC MAKES IT THAT MUCH MORE EPIC DG!
I miss the identity /:
Neo-cookie cutter
Bears is not $2.2 bil . That's just bears share . It's well over $ 4 billion
What’s with the music😂
Music is too loud DG
Buffalo stadium is the only one that sucks
All boring cookie cutter crap.
I can see a future within the next 30 or 50 years. 80% of more Stadiums will have a dome roofs. which i don't have a issue with them. If i live in a state that has NFL team. i would love to have a dome roof at the stadiums
Stop that stupid, distracting background music.
Stop woth the music