This performance in my opinion is better than the EMI studio recording years later.I have listened this variation performed by over 500 pianists. Gilels is the BEST of all.
I heard him playing 1969 and it was stupendous. Hear he bangs and plays dispirited. You didn't hear me-I own this piece because was coached by Karl Schnabel
Потрясающе! И ведь надо же, кому-то не понравилось! Удивляюсь. Не сравнить со студийной записью. Гилельс вживую всегда играл вдохновенно. Токи идут в зал, испепеляющая энергия! А как проникновенно и глубоко звучат лирические эпизоды! Неповторимый тембр его звука! Спасибо! Thank you! Grazie! GILELS is the BEST!
Мария Юдина играла тоже превосходно , и также в вживую , но , несмотря на то , что я россиянка , стоит послушать Гленна Гульда , он играл эти вариации блестяще , ни с чем не сравнить
@@elenakadlecik6665 , ну так, может, и не стоит сравнивать? Замечательно, что есть разные интерпретации, было бы невероятно скучно, если бы был один-единственный, хоть и идеальный вариант. Гульда обязательно послушаю, очень люблю. Он многое делает совершенно неповторимым - например, 3-х голосную ля минорную инвенцию или гайдновскую сонату Ми-b мажор. Послушала после него великого Рихтера - хорошо, правильно, но после Гульда скучно. )))
I really love the serious and in a certain sense dramatic way he plays Beethoven! I don't know how many hundreds times I heard this already but it's always an experience. Every single time!
oh my god, i was impressed from the first note on! the theme was played so passionate, it was heart-breaking! each variation had its own personality, it was such a pleasure to hear that! he was truly a genious..
When I heard this piece for the 1st time, it was Gilels, I thought how crazy is Beethoven? 32 variations in such short time. Something must be wrong with this crazy WoO
there's an even more hair-raising live version from Gilels from 1969, I like that one best. He really owns this piece, I haven't heard anyone else who comes close.
@darkblueangel1956 "The ideal interpreter should have a gift of divination, it is so difficult to explain, is a process I would say... is magical because the Interpreter becomes Beethoven and without that magical process can not interpret it, one has to become Beethoven. The score is just a skeleton to be filled with the life of one, with the blood of oneself " (Claudio Arrau) "Conformity, conformity is one of the most horrible things in our world ..." (Claudio Arrau)
@darkblueangel1956 "In approaching to a work I try to deepen and understand, of course, the general atmosphere at the moment they were created... and where was the composer's life. I try to understand the general time in their literature, painting , sculpture, architecture ... in general I try to understand how people lived at that time, and the rest is creative intuition. " (Claudio Arrau)
La versión más bella de esta tremenda obra, de todas las que he escuchado es la del maestro Claudio Arrau... es simplemente magna e inolvidable, me pone los pelos de punta... creo que no está en TH-cam, por lo que quiero subirla (espero, porque me da lata hacer clips). La versión de Gilels tiene partes bien logradas y otras no tanto, está un poco desbalanceada...
Certainly a highly virtuosic approach that may -- or may not -- have been fully intended by Beethoven (We'll never know, of course! ;-) but it's artististic and sensitive where sensitivity is needed, and it certainly holds our attention. One of those cases, however, where it becomes a bit too tempting to value speed over authenticity. An approach like this to any of the great Viennese classicists always prompts me to think "Just because you CAN, doesn't necessarily mean you SHOULD, does it?" Pianism as exemplified by Russians in the last century seems always to want interpret "Allegro" as "Presto"and "Vivace" as "Prestissimo Possible." I, personally, believe it has had a deleterious effect on ARTISTRY among too many of the more prominent entrants into International Competitions, which more and more came to resemble HORSE RACES as the influence of such as Horowitz, and Richter set in.
Useless to argue authenticity if Beethoven's intent is unknown (as you admit in your post). Say you don't like this version and that you prefer another; that's all right. But trying to posit some objective standard of artistry because of your subjective evaluation of virtuosity smacks of hubris.
@Bret6464 Disculpen pero voy a escibir en español porque así me puedo expresar mejor. Gilels en cuanto a Beethoven no tiene ni la comprensión ni la sensibilidad necesarias, su Beethoven no se compara con el de Arrau.. Beethoven fue un compositor clásico-romántico, con un complejo mundo interior que reflejaba en su música y el cual sólo Arrau muestra en toda su dimensión. No olvide que Arrau no sólo se formó en la escuela romántica alemana, sino que provenía de la casta beethoveniana.
En general buena interpretación.. pero .... no tiene nada que ver con el espíritu que anima esta obra. Algo desequilibrada y descontrolada la encontré, como "Arrebatos de Gilels sobre una obra de Beethoven" podría haberse titulado esta interpretación. Emil Gilels es uno de mis pianistas favoritos , pero como la mayoría, frecuentemente se deja llevar por sus impulsos emocionales y no puede sobreponerse al carácter más introspectivo de la obra. De 1 a 10 => 7 El mejor para esta bella obra: Arrau.
A SONORIDADE ESTÁ UM TANTO METÁLICA, OU ESSE PIANO ESTÁ MUITO VELHO PRECISANDO DE REFORMA, OU O PIANISTA ESTÁ APLICANDO MUITA FORÇA NAS TECLAS. OU ISSO OU AQUILO!!!
now that is a good point. personally, i'm regret that coughing in gilels' concerts was not punishable by law! i love his hammerklavier too and i hate to see that fantastic third movement ruined by a bunch of spitters who had the privilege of being there.
Listening now after 1969 Gilels performance in Odessa disappointment. Like George Czifra , Boris Bloch. Myself had great success, some say that I reinvented this piece. I think, I owned it. Gilels so pedestrian. Sorry!
i am sorry i played this piece on my digital piano with this video opened in order to play the piece simultaneously but this video has pitch problem it sounds bad both my piano and video plays together
Потрясение! феноменально!❤❤❤❤❤
This performance in my opinion is better than the EMI studio recording years later.I have listened this variation performed by over 500 pianists. Gilels is the BEST of all.
I heard him playing 1969 and it was stupendous. Hear he bangs and plays dispirited. You didn't hear me-I own this piece because was coached by Karl Schnabel
Полностью с вами согласен. Гилельс лучший из всех
Yes, Gilels is the BEST of all !!!
Потрясающе! И ведь надо же, кому-то не понравилось! Удивляюсь.
Не сравнить со студийной записью. Гилельс вживую всегда играл вдохновенно. Токи идут в зал, испепеляющая энергия! А как проникновенно и глубоко звучат лирические эпизоды! Неповторимый тембр его звука!
Спасибо! Thank you! Grazie! GILELS is the BEST!
It's dispirited-I play it better
Мария Юдина играла тоже превосходно , и также в вживую , но , несмотря на то , что я россиянка , стоит послушать Гленна Гульда , он играл эти вариации блестяще , ни с чем не сравнить
@@elenakadlecik6665 , ну так, может, и не стоит сравнивать? Замечательно, что есть разные интерпретации, было бы невероятно скучно, если бы был один-единственный, хоть и идеальный вариант.
Гульда обязательно послушаю, очень люблю.
Он многое делает совершенно неповторимым - например, 3-х голосную ля минорную инвенцию или гайдновскую сонату Ми-b мажор. Послушала после него великого Рихтера - хорошо, правильно, но после Гульда скучно. )))
Ещё, для меня, Анатолий Ведерников, Александр Гольденвейзер, Мария Юдина.
Глубочайше.
Ммммм, шизофрения с объектами что имплаинг(включают) ощущения сами по себе же. Таблетки быра пей старикашка
Ingrediply brilliant...wonderful interpretation..enchanting !! The best Of All..absolutely!
I really love the serious and in a certain sense dramatic way he plays Beethoven! I don't know how many hundreds times I heard this already but it's always an experience. Every single time!
Didn't expect this piece can be played to this level. Stunning!
Fenomenal pianist!
What fire! Such a brilliant, miraculous playing! Thank you Maestro...
oh my god, i was impressed from the first note on! the theme was played so passionate, it was heart-breaking! each variation had its own personality, it was such a pleasure to hear that! he was truly a genious..
Слов нет! Это нечто запредельное!!!
Excellent!!!
much better than anyone else playing this piece
whoever has put together this playlist has really good taste. A lot of "new" delicious pieces!
Which playlist? Could you please paste the URL of the playlist?
Фантастическая интерпретация
ПОЖАЛУЙ,ЛУЧШАЯ ИЗ ВСЕХ ВОЗМОЖНЫХ!!
Энергетика войны или противостояния...
Вы играть умеете?
When I heard this piece for the 1st time, it was Gilels, I thought how crazy is Beethoven? 32 variations in such short time. Something must be wrong with this crazy WoO
Emil, where have you been ? Where are you going ? When will you arrive ? Bravo !
greatest beethoven interpreter ever....
every time i listen to him i think: wow that's the way it must be played
This is an absolute best performance of this piece!
The best I have heard
Simply magnificent!!!!!!!
Thank you!
this is it. Grasping by the heart. Passionate at times, then reflective, as are these variations.
I have that version. And I share his option, it's really the best version by far of this piece!!!
Fantastico
there's an even more hair-raising live version from Gilels from 1969, I like that one best. He really owns this piece, I haven't heard anyone else who comes close.
OH M-Y G-O-D !
Самое потрясающее исполнение данного шедевра Бетховена!!Лучше никто не исполнит!Какая глубина чувств,драматизм,прочувствованность!
Наверное, это самое ценное в музыке.
Убеждена, что Бетховен-исполнитель нашел своего продолжателя в Гилельсе.
Спасибо!!я с Вами абсолютно согласен!!!
согласна)) именно Бетховена больше всего люблю у Гилельса)
Я просто тоже это произведение люблю теперь очень!
@darkblueangel1956
"The ideal interpreter should have a gift of divination, it is so difficult to explain, is a process I would say... is magical because the Interpreter becomes Beethoven and without that magical process can not interpret it, one has to become Beethoven.
The score is just a skeleton to be filled with the life of one, with the blood of oneself " (Claudio Arrau)
"Conformity, conformity is one of the most horrible things in our world ..." (Claudio Arrau)
this is great
Sublime
Bravo!!
Гениально!
stunning!
@darkblueangel1956
"In approaching to a work I try to deepen and understand, of course, the general atmosphere at the moment they were created... and where was the composer's life. I try to understand the general time in their literature, painting , sculpture, architecture ... in general I try to understand how people lived at that time, and the rest is creative intuition. " (Claudio Arrau)
Thank you.
Mientras Arrau estudiaba la biografía y el contexto histórico de Beethoven, Giles lo regresaba de la muerte en esta sesión espiritista
The most awesome for me is 08:02! Beware, your ears are gonna explode!
gilels > richter :) his touch is unbelievable.
La versión más bella de esta tremenda obra, de todas las que he escuchado es la del maestro Claudio Arrau... es simplemente magna e inolvidable, me pone los pelos de punta... creo que no está en TH-cam, por lo que quiero subirla (espero, porque me da lata hacer clips).
La versión de Gilels tiene partes bien logradas y otras no tanto, está un poco desbalanceada...
I thought the same thing...and the D958 sonata is in the same key of C minor. And written over 20 years later. Hmm....
I very much prefer Rachmaninoff's recoring to all others, but this one comes closest. Bravo Gilels!
This is such a nice recording, but jesus it hurts my head a little with the key change ;-;
I guess , best or different ?
@zhangshinyi They are all masters,can't compare
@bachkwt true!
Hold tight to your chairs! Hoomeyow!!
Yes, I think it's rather high.
Dieses Klavierspiel ist nur mit einem Superlativ zu beurteilen!
Certainly a highly virtuosic approach that may -- or may not -- have been fully intended by Beethoven (We'll never know, of course! ;-) but it's artististic and sensitive where sensitivity is needed, and it certainly holds our attention. One of those cases, however, where it becomes a bit too tempting to value speed over authenticity. An approach like this to any of the great Viennese classicists always prompts me to think "Just because you CAN, doesn't necessarily mean you SHOULD, does it?"
Pianism as exemplified by Russians in the last century seems always to want interpret "Allegro" as "Presto"and "Vivace" as "Prestissimo Possible." I, personally, believe it has had a deleterious effect on ARTISTRY among too many of the more prominent entrants into International Competitions, which more and more came to resemble HORSE RACES as the influence of such as Horowitz, and Richter set in.
Useless to argue authenticity if Beethoven's intent is unknown (as you admit in your post). Say you don't like this version and that you prefer another; that's all right. But trying to posit some objective standard of artistry because of your subjective evaluation of virtuosity smacks of hubris.
Russian pianism is very difference. Check Schubert's Sonata by Richter - th-cam.com/video/lncNcNtGkJY/w-d-xo.html
That is funny :)
je ne sais pourquoi Beethoven renia cette composition.et vous?merci
@Bret6464 Disculpen pero voy a escibir en español porque así me puedo expresar mejor.
Gilels en cuanto a Beethoven no tiene ni la comprensión ni la sensibilidad necesarias, su Beethoven no se compara con el de Arrau.. Beethoven fue un compositor clásico-romántico, con un complejo mundo interior que reflejaba en su música y el cual sólo Arrau muestra en toda su dimensión.
No olvide que Arrau no sólo se formó en la escuela romántica alemana, sino que provenía de la casta beethoveniana.
En general buena interpretación.. pero .... no tiene nada que ver con el espíritu que anima esta obra. Algo desequilibrada y descontrolada la encontré, como "Arrebatos de Gilels sobre una obra de Beethoven" podría haberse titulado esta interpretación.
Emil Gilels es uno de mis pianistas favoritos , pero como la mayoría, frecuentemente se deja llevar por sus impulsos emocionales y no puede sobreponerse al carácter más introspectivo de la obra. De 1 a 10 => 7
El mejor para esta bella obra: Arrau.
Listen for Rachmaninoff
the only bad thing about this is the audience ....... they just wouldnt shut up
A SONORIDADE ESTÁ UM TANTO METÁLICA, OU ESSE PIANO ESTÁ MUITO VELHO PRECISANDO DE REFORMA, OU O PIANISTA ESTÁ APLICANDO MUITA FORÇA NAS TECLAS. OU ISSO OU AQUILO!!!
now that is a good point. personally, i'm regret that coughing in gilels' concerts was not punishable by law!
i love his hammerklavier too and i hate to see that fantastic third movement ruined by a bunch of spitters who had the privilege of being there.
xD déjalo las drogas y la vida como foreveralone le cagaron la cabeza irremediablemente
yes, furry
Listening now after 1969 Gilels performance in Odessa disappointment. Like George Czifra , Boris Bloch. Myself had great success, some say that I reinvented this piece. I think, I owned it. Gilels so pedestrian. Sorry!
i am sorry i played this piece on my digital piano with this video opened in order to play the piece simultaneously but this video has pitch problem it sounds bad both my piano and video plays together
DEAR FRIENDS!
WELCOME to MY NEW CHANNEL -
MY BELOVED WORLD
EvaHartwig