@@alexdavison2978 is that for edexcel? how long would you spend actually reading/analysing the text before writing the essay? i'm sorry to ask, my teacher was never clear regarding timings lol. also nice liam gallagher profile pic :)
@@idoru43 yes for edexcel. It’s different for each person but I’d say 15-20 mins reading and analysing and the rest writing. And thank you :) good luck
my little list of things polite turn taking mean length utterance - no dominate - she waits nicely for him to question (discourse interesting) standard English - it was Noam Chomsky in his nativist model - adult speak fragmentary language poverty of stimulus make children impossible learn - mom perfect English there's many chickens - copying - repetition 'many chickens primary auxiliary form different not just copy' beyond telegraphic stage events two years old tom can count she's not going NO LISTEN TO ME COUNT she'slisten to me count pragmatic skinner negative mom positive permission she's asking permission SHALL pause abstract perfect standard English many ways affirming statement pause in each number CDS cognitive stretch remember chicken morning tag question not adjacency pair sort of scaffolding skinner say he copy copy repetition stroke is pretty impressive 2.5 no past tense inflection stroke no stroked and reRECAST you did dint you - you stroked it model what is discourse-way of speaking (dominance, narrative, argumentatory) we did is quite interesting not yes CONTEXT has have has we dk without context didactical
Please make a correction that Skinner argues that children learn through " positive reinforcemnet" and not the "negative reinforcemnet" as you mentioned in the above video. X
I think he argues for both. He argues that operant conditioning shapes future language choices in children and in general behaviour, which involves rewarding behaviour you want to be repeated and punishing behaviour you don't. New studies prove that negative reinforcement (punishing wrong behaviour through "no" or obviously correcting a child's language, which is also a form of punishment) does not work and slows down progress, but it is still involved in the original theory.
![CAMPปลิ้น | รวม Highlight 2024! PART [1/2]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/6hnvNnvYloU/mqdefault.jpg)
Cheers Paul, That was enlightening and was very informative.
cheers Paul, this video helped me to annotate my own transcript for a past paper :)
how long should I spend on this question
The whole paper is 1 hour 15 minutes. And it’s only 1 question
@@alexdavison2978 is that for edexcel? how long would you spend actually reading/analysing the text before writing the essay? i'm sorry to ask, my teacher was never clear regarding timings lol. also nice liam gallagher profile pic :)
@@idoru43 yes for edexcel. It’s different for each person but I’d say 15-20 mins reading and analysing and the rest writing. And thank you :) good luck
@@alexdavison2978 thats great thank you! i appreciate it. good luck to you too :)
my little list of things
polite turn taking
mean length utterance - no dominate - she waits nicely for him to question (discourse interesting)
standard English - it was Noam Chomsky in his nativist model - adult speak fragmentary language poverty of stimulus make children impossible learn - mom perfect English
there's many chickens - copying - repetition 'many chickens
primary auxiliary form different not just copy'
beyond telegraphic stage events two years old
tom can count
she's not going NO LISTEN TO ME COUNT she'slisten to me count pragmatic skinner negative mom positive
permission she's asking permission SHALL
pause
abstract perfect standard English
many ways affirming statement pause in each number CDS
cognitive stretch remember chicken morning tag question not adjacency pair sort of scaffolding
skinner say he copy copy
repetition
stroke is pretty impressive 2.5 no past tense inflection stroke no stroked and reRECAST you did dint you - you stroked it model
what is discourse-way of speaking (dominance, narrative, argumentatory)
we did is quite interesting not yes
CONTEXT has have has we dk without context didactical
Please make a correction that Skinner argues that children learn through " positive reinforcemnet" and not the "negative reinforcemnet" as you mentioned in the above video. X
I think he argues for both. He argues that operant conditioning shapes future language choices in children and in general behaviour, which involves rewarding behaviour you want to be repeated and punishing behaviour you don't. New studies prove that negative reinforcement (punishing wrong behaviour through "no" or obviously correcting a child's language, which is also a form of punishment) does not work and slows down progress, but it is still involved in the original theory.