I was just made aware that I forgot the Corythosaurus in this video.... That one would sit at C tier for me. Sorry bout that. Also keep in mind, these are my *subjective* opinions. No need to get hostile in the comments- stay respectful please.
yea the tarbo is so underrated...just because it has a pose that lifts slightly upwards and promos are mostly from the front it looks very fat but in hand the fat even if clearly makes it more bulky than skeletals it feels natural and something that i bet we would be able to see in *some* living tarbosaurus in my opinion its my most favourite theropod figure from pnso it doesnt just represent tarbosaurus as species but with the fat and stuff it also makes it look like one certain individual not just any tarbosaurus and i love this so much because no animal is perfect especially older aged ones you can have deformities, scars, fat level depending on how lucky the animal was in meals recently etc etc meanwhile the skeletals first they focus only on the skeleton not soft tissue and third they depict the shape of the skeleton at its healthiest shape and normal walking horizontal pose which definitely could not be so perfect in a living animal for the reasons i stated above
broo i think the helicoprion is simply amazing in hand, the details are amazing, the color has a really nice shine, and sure, it's pretty weird, but the helicoprion itself is pretty weird
yes. chuanzis skull is just ARHGAHRHAH cancer. essien barely knuckle walks, in fact it can be played off as just a movement that happened to have a claw on the ground.
@@kwaziness The skull is... fine though? It lines up with what we have and the proportions are perfect. It’s one of the most accurate PNSO figures to date
i agree with everything although i think tarbo should be B tier based on discussions i had with many people it is not impossible for a tarbosaurus to get this bulky therefore its a good figure when trying to represent an individual but bad when trying to show the general appearance of the species also i would put pinaco in A tier only because there are better figures in S
How does the PNS0 T-Rex have problems My only problem is that when you open it smells it looks like it’s muscle gels are bleeding but that’s pretty much it I do than that it’s still the best looking Rex in my opinion
Well this was a good tier list on all of the PNSO figures so far,but personally I for my tier list,the lowest PNSO figure would be around D tier for me,but this was a very funny & great SpinoDude video. And I wish you awesome people a great day.
Love the vid, agree with most, but you did the tarbo dirty man :( It's great in hand. Even the proportions make a lot more sense. edit: helicoprion, nooooo! It's beautiful and unique!
Interesting tierlist, I respect your opinion and taste, I wasn't agree on all your choices but in many cases I was hella agree with you, like with those two useless rexes 😩
my opinion on a couple of the most memorable ones 😀: huge agree on the tarbosaurus, seeing him with his binocular vision is just no pinacosaurus at d tier because of paint but borealopelta at s tier even with its paint 🧐 i'd switch their roles around yay miragaia at s tier!! stan rosana the miragaia!! effortless queen!! i like the sinoceratops more than the pachyrhinosaurus as a model but not as species always wanted a carnotaurus that was as accurate as CollectA's but not as 2-Dimensional, PNSO almost hit the nail on the head but the SCALES AARGH B-Tier yeah the helicoprion is just off wilson goes to A i still need a definitive rex figure 😩 parasaurolophus would be S tier but i want my paras to be graceful more than CHONCCY so A IM SO CONFLICTED ON THE PACHYCEPHALOSAURUS he aint thicc enough in so many spaces but just LOOK AT HIM AJRBRNEKSJ I DONT KNOW dear stego pair: why are you 60 dollars screw you best spino available!! instant S i like the gr toys carchar more than pnso's sorry not sorry torvo has the best overall body but the worst head for a theropod that pnso gave us qianzhousaurus has the second worst head, too long which isnt something complained about often dear "nAnOtYrAnNuS": why are you 30 dollars screw you somethings off about the allo i cant pinpoint it he gets D okay das all i can comment on with good enough judgement toodles
tarbosaurus DOES have binocular vision...it's just not as good as t rex in fact if you watch dinodragon's review the skull matches perfectly from above
@@kwaziness still it's not impossible considering tyrannosaurids were heavy and tarbosaurus would need speed due to the prey it hunted plus the fat that all animals have to some level and the skeletal they made for it is not too far off from a real skeletal other than the gastralia is just too small but if you ignore the bones on the skeletal it's just some more bulk over an original accurate skeletal
@@firegator6853 the gastralia/the gut shouldn't be dipping down so diagonally. it makes the transition from the neck to the chest to the stomach look horrendous. if the gastralia were more horizontal as it should be, it'd look more like wilson who is WAY more visually appealing.
@@kwaziness i have that figure in hands and i can say the "triangle" look is narrower than the upper side of the body if you look from the front of the figure which means it's fat and skin if it was gastralia it would form a perfectly round look on the belly from the front view, plus the gastralia on tyrannosaurids like trex and tarbosaurus is not completely horizontal it still dips down a little bit diagonally with specimens like stan having this feature more obvious so it looks more naturally applied and not deeping down as diagonally as many people think and the addition of fat which is present in both crododilians and big lizards of today the skeletons of which are way skinnier than the living specimens, more suggested to base it off a komodo dragon due to their more active lifestyle (birds are more closer related to dinosaurs yes, but they evolved to be as skinny as possible for flight and land birds like ratites evolved from flying ancestors as result still having the skinny bodyplan and use it for speed) , i thought that too when the figure was first announced so this is the reason i believe it's alright as a specific specimen at a specific time of it's life not just a general reconstruction of the animal
I said it before and I'll say it again: that Torvosaurus head without lips looks like Dag from beaver brothers! Nice to hear its strange head sculpting being mentioned 😅
2:55 please Enlighten me which figures are better than pnso kronosaurus? Pnsos kronosaurus is the definitive kronosaurus. That’s a fact. No other figures top it, please tell me which company makes ‘better’ kronosaurus
Both Safari Ltd and CollectA have better Kronosaurus models that exhibit better proportioning and anatomy. PNSOs Kronosaurus isn't the worst thing ever, but it struggles in plenty of areas that sets it back from consideration as a good interpretation of the animal.
I dont really like the stego but i do like its *bebe* the *bebe* is cool what about a botm tier list if that would work (if you cant tell botm is my favorite company)
Everyone is rating them based on price???🤣 idk I love everything pnso does compared to other companies their style is unique it’s like a way more accurate Papo anything they make would be s tier for me
@@firegator6853 Skeletals do not equal evidence, but there's lacm 23845, you can find skeletal of that. And there's BMPR2002.4.2, not much information on it but you can find in on display at the Black Hills Institute.
I'm just not a fan of their rexes. At all. Wilson looks alright, but theres something about the posture and the head shape that isnt right to me and I cant put my finger on it. The juvenile just doesnt look like a juvenile or a nanotyrannus, end of and Andrea is just so......broken. When animals sit they dont just remove their bones and let their legs go all wibbly wobbly.
@@dinoxels Nanotyrannus's teeth are nothing like a Tyrannosaurus tooth and no other large theropod dinosaur changes tooth shape with age like that, and we've found Juvenile Tyrannosaurus fossils and they don't match Nanotyrannus.
@@The_PokeSaurus ikr, that’s like actually a really decent figure. And ik this might be a hot take, but the tarbo is literally my favorite figure from any company
@@blobfishiant8487 tarbo is not as bad as people say...just compare stan the t rex to sue and others and then compare pnso skeletal shape (ignoring the bones just the shape) next to a franoys tarbosaurus...you will notice tyrannosaurids have a very big variety of individual variation based on the individual variation we see on t rex its not impossible for it's closest relative to also have this much individual vairation...the snout may seem narrow but there is a whole skeletal of tarbosaurus that got narrow skull, the stereoscopic vision is perfect next to the t rex one...the bulkyness is the big discussion, it may look bad and for a general representaiton of tarbosaurus AS SPECIES it is but if you think of it as a certain, powerful individual that just finished having a big meal like a dead sauropod it's not implausible it may sound surprising for many people but as individual tarbosaurus figure is awesome...maybe the feet are a little bigger than what they really are but it's a tiny detail that no one cares about the tierlist is based on his own opinion so if he says he doesn't like something it's personal thing it doesnt mean it's inaccurate or bad and stuff
![I MADE A DINOSAUR BOOK WHEN I WAS 5 YEARS OLD [Casual SpinoDino]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/lU_PNkiJZTg/mqdefault.jpg)
I was just made aware that I forgot the Corythosaurus in this video.... That one would sit at C tier for me. Sorry bout that.
Also keep in mind, these are my *subjective* opinions. No need to get hostile in the comments- stay respectful please.
T. rex: sits
Spinodude: NO 😤
Yeah, and the nanotyrannus, I know that it’s not a real species anymore, but I still like it, everything pnso has done is great
@@CatholicaVeritasIndonesia also the nanotyrannus is named logan. how ironic
@@ButterLoticus4044 pnso knew what they were doing
The Pachycephalosaurus is just full on my most wanted one at this point.
it is raising on ma list fast boi
That's a really good figure but I don't know why its tail is so skinny, shouldn't it be more bulky?
In my opinion no pnso figure you showed here deserves to be ranked lower than D tier. I mean compared to other brands they are pretty solid.
@Prehistoric Tank Studios yeah
Ankylosaurus? I love it but the paint quality dropped when I got mine unfortunately
I had the same issue. Ruined my day lol. Looked like someone left it in a closet and forgot about it
only included their new sculpts which started with the Tuojiangosaurus. The ank def took a quality dip which is too bad.
I want to get the Miragaia too
A piece of me died when tarbosaurus went in F tier
ED THE BADASS
@@Cdr2002 Patches & Spekels strange uncle
2:50 What’s wrong with the sitty-good girl?
It's cool but it's expensive. That's what goes for every PNSO figure. I got the Wilson after so much pain. I like the Tarbo though.
yea the tarbo is so underrated...just because it has a pose that lifts slightly upwards and promos are mostly from the front it looks very fat but in hand the fat even if clearly makes it more bulky than skeletals it feels natural and something that i bet we would be able to see in *some* living tarbosaurus
in my opinion its my most favourite theropod figure from pnso it doesnt just represent tarbosaurus as species but with the fat and stuff it also makes it look like one certain individual not just any tarbosaurus and i love this so much because no animal is perfect especially older aged ones you can have deformities, scars, fat level depending on how lucky the animal was in meals recently etc etc meanwhile the skeletals first they focus only on the skeleton not soft tissue and third they depict the shape of the skeleton at its healthiest shape and normal walking horizontal pose which definitely could not be so perfect in a living animal for the reasons i stated above
@@firegator6853 Absolutely agree. It depicts more of an individual with personality from the species and not one general piece.
Him: puts tarbo in f tier
Tarbo community (if it exists): His RACIST!
Tyrannosaurus rex: Imma just sit.
Spinodude: *breathes heavily*
broo i think the helicoprion is simply amazing in hand, the details are amazing, the color has a really nice shine, and sure, it's pretty weird, but the helicoprion itself is pretty weird
Agree with most, but Paul, being my first pnso model is s tier for me. Great video. Please make this a series.
Who is Paul?
Knuckle dragging Essien in S but the phenomenal Tarbosaurus in F?
yes.
chuanzis skull is just ARHGAHRHAH cancer. essien barely knuckle walks, in fact it can be played off as just a movement that happened to have a claw on the ground.
@@kwaziness The skull is... fine though? It lines up with what we have and the proportions are perfect. It’s one of the most accurate PNSO figures to date
@@happymoomoocow Yea, it’s an A tier in my opinion
honestly im all for chonky tyrannosaurs, but they overdid it with the tarbosaurus. not to mention the fact that the head is so goofy looking
Im glad Carchar and Spino is up there :). Great vid.
Now, you’re doing a tier list on the Dinosaur models from PSNO, awesome partner.
The stego is based upon a fossil that is in a Colorado museum. Pretty dang cool!!
“Dragon head Torvosaurus”
Hey guys, I want to let you all know that tomorrow my project (Sea monsters of the Caribbean) will be premiering soon.
“Probably”
Should I get the zhuchengtyrannus? Is it good?
PNSO is certainly an interesting company, to say the least.
Essien is neat
Torvo is wheat
Brian is Chad
And Nanotyrannus I scream, "Egad!"
Can you update that list
i agree with everything although i think tarbo should be B tier based on discussions i had with many people it is not impossible for a tarbosaurus to get this bulky therefore its a good figure when trying to represent an individual but bad when trying to show the general appearance of the species
also i would put pinaco in A tier only because there are better figures in S
I really hope to get the Tuojiangosaurus. It’s my favorite because of the amount of coins it gave you in Jurassic park builder.
RIP JPB
2:53 that ‘no’ had me laughing way too hard
W vid G
Does the megalodon not count?
Why was the cretoxyrhina not here? is it that new?
How does the PNS0 T-Rex have problems My only problem is that when you open it smells it looks like it’s muscle gels are bleeding but that’s pretty much it I do than that it’s still the best looking Rex in my opinion
What would the vinyl meg be in?
Well this was a good tier list on all of the PNSO figures so far,but personally I for my tier list,the lowest PNSO figure would be around D tier for me,but this was a very funny & great SpinoDude video.
And I wish you awesome people a great day.
Could you please do a tylosaurus review? I just love the monitor lizard look to it.
dude! please make another worst dino toys video. the last one made me fall out of my chair!!!!!!
Is Deng fish there
Love the vid, agree with most, but you did the tarbo dirty man :( It's great in hand. Even the proportions make a lot more sense.
edit: helicoprion, nooooo! It's beautiful and unique!
Prehistoric fish ugly caca poopoo peepee design
Interesting tierlist, I respect your opinion and taste, I wasn't agree on all your choices but in many cases I was hella agree with you, like with those two useless rexes 😩
Where’s Patton the Megalodon
my opinion on a couple of the most memorable ones 😀:
huge agree on the tarbosaurus, seeing him with his binocular vision is just no
pinacosaurus at d tier because of paint but borealopelta at s tier even with its paint 🧐 i'd switch their roles around
yay miragaia at s tier!! stan rosana the miragaia!! effortless queen!!
i like the sinoceratops more than the pachyrhinosaurus as a model but not as species
always wanted a carnotaurus that was as accurate as CollectA's but not as 2-Dimensional, PNSO almost hit the nail on the head but the SCALES AARGH B-Tier
yeah the helicoprion is just off
wilson goes to A i still need a definitive rex figure 😩
parasaurolophus would be S tier but i want my paras to be graceful more than CHONCCY so A
IM SO CONFLICTED ON THE PACHYCEPHALOSAURUS he aint thicc enough in so many spaces but just LOOK AT HIM AJRBRNEKSJ I DONT KNOW
dear stego pair: why are you 60 dollars screw you
best spino available!! instant S
i like the gr toys carchar more than pnso's sorry not sorry
torvo has the best overall body but the worst head for a theropod that pnso gave us
qianzhousaurus has the second worst head, too long which isnt something complained about often
dear "nAnOtYrAnNuS": why are you 30 dollars screw you
somethings off about the allo i cant pinpoint it he gets D
okay das all i can comment on with good enough judgement toodles
tarbosaurus DOES have binocular vision...it's just not as good as t rex
in fact if you watch dinodragon's review the skull matches perfectly from above
@@firegator6853 i know it does, but the way they reconstructed it is just really, *really* ugly
@@kwaziness still it's not impossible considering tyrannosaurids were heavy and tarbosaurus would need speed due to the prey it hunted plus the fat that all animals have to some level and the skeletal they made for it is not too far off from a real skeletal other than the gastralia is just too small but if you ignore the bones on the skeletal it's just some more bulk over an original accurate skeletal
@@firegator6853 the gastralia/the gut shouldn't be dipping down so diagonally. it makes the transition from the neck to the chest to the stomach look horrendous. if the gastralia were more horizontal as it should be, it'd look more like wilson who is WAY more visually appealing.
@@kwaziness i have that figure in hands and i can say the "triangle" look is narrower than the upper side of the body if you look from the front of the figure which means it's fat and skin if it was gastralia it would form a perfectly round look on the belly from the front view, plus the gastralia on tyrannosaurids like trex and tarbosaurus is not completely horizontal it still dips down a little bit diagonally with specimens like stan having this feature more obvious so it looks more naturally applied and not deeping down as diagonally as many people think and the addition of fat which is present in both crododilians and big lizards of today the skeletons of which are way skinnier than the living specimens, more suggested to base it off a komodo dragon due to their more active lifestyle (birds are more closer related to dinosaurs yes, but they evolved to be as skinny as possible for flight and land birds like ratites evolved from flying ancestors as result still having the skinny bodyplan and use it for speed) , i thought that too when the figure was first announced
so this is the reason i believe it's alright as a specific specimen at a specific time of it's life not just a general reconstruction of the animal
Why nanotyranous? Wasn't it proven to be a juvenile t-rex like years ago?
Some decisions PNSO makes are just beyond explanation lol
I love tierlists :)
I said it before and I'll say it again: that Torvosaurus head without lips looks like Dag from beaver brothers! Nice to hear its strange head sculpting being mentioned 😅
Do you think about getting papo brachiosaurus?
Hahahaha, nice. I wished I had a PNSO figure but they are too pricy and I do want to get one especially the Sinoceratops.
2:55 please Enlighten me which figures are better than pnso kronosaurus? Pnsos kronosaurus is the definitive kronosaurus. That’s a fact. No other figures top it, please tell me which company makes ‘better’ kronosaurus
Both Safari Ltd and CollectA have better Kronosaurus models that exhibit better proportioning and anatomy. PNSOs Kronosaurus isn't the worst thing ever, but it struggles in plenty of areas that sets it back from consideration as a good interpretation of the animal.
I thought there were 52 pnso prehistoric figures now? Or is this just the ones available in the states?
He just did the newer ones for this video.
We need an updated list! ;)
Me after seeing my fav(Torvo) on e tier : *sadness*
What about the Dakosaurus?
BOTM tier list-NOW!
Now do a schliech tier list 😏
I dont really like the stego but i do like its *bebe* the *bebe* is cool what about a botm tier list if that would work (if you cant tell botm is my favorite company)
“Nannotyrannus.”
*silence.*
*F*
>:( you stole this tier list from someone on my groupchat
It was me
What would you rank their olorotitan at? :)
A tier for me- I'm gonna have to make a part 2 to this video with the new additions :)
@@TheSpinoDude Cool thx! :) Personally I would probably even give him the the S-tier just because of how beautiful I think his face is
tier list other figure brands old or modern.
Dimetrodon: FFFFF!!!!!
Everyone is rating them based on price???🤣 idk I love everything pnso does compared to other companies their style is unique it’s like a way more accurate Papo anything they make would be s tier for me
Was fan of Papo.... until I found this brand recently and got mine delivered yesterday. Way better than Papo!
Poor torvosaurus he's was my favorite dino he is lonely in E😞
My favorite is also the spinosaurus
i missed cretoxyrhina, mosasaurus and levyatan too
How about Ron the mosasaurus
Me: Yes 🦈🦷🦎 is S Tier 😆
Also Me: Torvosaurus E Tier 🥲
cool roller! but i think tarbosaurus is much better
WHY IS TARBOSAURUS IN F TIER I LIKE CHUNKY DINO
2:10 yes thankyou
You do realize Juvenile Tyrannosaurus have been found, and they don't look like Nanotyrannus?
@@The_PokeSaurus show us two complete skeletals of them and we will trust you
@@firegator6853 Wait, Nanotyrannus or Juvenile Tyrannosaurus?
@@firegator6853 Skeletals do not equal evidence, but there's lacm 23845, you can find skeletal of that. And there's BMPR2002.4.2, not much information on it but you can find in on display at the Black Hills Institute.
@@The_PokeSaurus both...one nanotyrannus and one juvenile t rex so the differences appear visible
on my opinion pinaco looks like a squished pineapple tbh lol
Poor Nanotyrannus
Dumengo is the 2 best carnotaurus but is the best is carnotaurus rex crimson king recream
I don’t like pnso very much which is a shame because they have so many unique dinosaurs and prehistoric animals
Большинство фигурок расставлены неправильно.
Do the other companies too
I just got the carcharodontosaurus!!!
I'm just not a fan of their rexes. At all. Wilson looks alright, but theres something about the posture and the head shape that isnt right to me and I cant put my finger on it. The juvenile just doesnt look like a juvenile or a nanotyrannus, end of and Andrea is just so......broken. When animals sit they dont just remove their bones and let their legs go all wibbly wobbly.
Actually, it does look like a Nonotyrannus. It looks like the Holotype of Nanotyrannus.
meanwhile wilson matches the accurate skeletals perfectly
Pancake boi
Maybe wait to rank them until you actually have them all.
Safari Ltd triceratops vs pnso torosaurus
2:11 I'm willing to kick a hornet's nest.
Nanotyrannus is not a Juvenile Tyrannosaurus, and I am happy to see PNSO challenge that myth.
Why?
@@dinoxels Nanotyrannus's teeth are nothing like a Tyrannosaurus tooth and no other large theropod dinosaur changes tooth shape with age like that, and we've found Juvenile Tyrannosaurus fossils and they don't match Nanotyrannus.
You crack me up man
@@smokecity6889 Do you know how many Museums and Paleontologists are on the side of Nanotyrannus being real?
@@The_PokeSaurus teeth change as an animal grows lol. Curious what specimens you are referring too “are Nanotyrannus” and aren’t.
Everything released after the small Spino is F tier because of the asinine prices they made them
There tarbosaurus is #1, in my opinion
Chomnk
I count 4 baby
I have the char char I did do a review oh it and I love it
Bebe points
BEBE
Moist
How could he do this to Nanotyrannus?!
@@The_PokeSaurus ikr, that’s like actually a really decent figure. And ik this might be a hot take, but the tarbo is literally my favorite figure from any company
@@blobfishiant8487 Yeah, ether he was afraid to talk about it, or, you know.
@@The_PokeSaurus yea lol
@@blobfishiant8487 tarbo is not as bad as people say...just compare stan the t rex to sue and others and then compare pnso skeletal shape (ignoring the bones just the shape) next to a franoys tarbosaurus...you will notice tyrannosaurids have a very big variety of individual variation
based on the individual variation we see on t rex its not impossible for it's closest relative to also have this much individual vairation...the snout may seem narrow but there is a whole skeletal of tarbosaurus that got narrow skull, the stereoscopic vision is perfect next to the t rex one...the bulkyness is the big discussion, it may look bad and for a general representaiton of tarbosaurus AS SPECIES it is but if you think of it as a certain, powerful individual that just finished having a big meal like a dead sauropod it's not implausible
it may sound surprising for many people but as individual tarbosaurus figure is awesome...maybe the feet are a little bigger than what they really are but it's a tiny detail that no one cares about
the tierlist is based on his own opinion so if he says he doesn't like something it's personal thing it doesnt mean it's inaccurate or bad and stuff
Hello, Your opinion is flawed in irrelevant layers of
nonsensical nuance.
ok
ok
Νo
Yes.
ok