Kardeşlerim burada bizim Iskit atalarimiza Hun atalarimiza sahiplenmeye çalışıyorlar onlara kaynaklarla atasız olmadığımızı gösterelim yaşasın Türk milleti yaşasın Turan birliği ❤
Umarım bu görüş 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖐 𝕯𝖚𝖓𝖞𝖆𝖘ı𝖓𝖉𝖆 her geçen gün büyür . ki büyümekte, sizin gibi atalarını korumaya çalışan 𝓣𝓾𝓻𝓴𝓵𝓮𝓻 sayesinde. Video çok güzel fakat İskitlerde 50 ila 100 yıllık bir kayma olmuş yinede muhteşem uğraşılmış emek verilmiş bir video elinize sağlık efenim.
yorumlarda avrupalı ve ortadoğulu eziklerin türk tarihini fakirleştirmeye çalıştığını çok net görüyoruz. kendi ezik tarihleri kukla olmaktan öteye gidemediği için tabii.
My favorite top 10 turkic empires 1. Ottoman empire 2.Mamluk sultanate 3.Mughal empire 4.Seljuk empire 5. Delhi Sultanate 6. Gaznavid empire 7.Timured empire 8.the golden horde empire 9.Zengid Dynasty 10.seljuk of Rum Big respect to my turkish friends❤
Zhongshan not. The "Beidi" mentioned is different from the Northern Barbarian one. But there are many missing like Kingdom of Yiqu, Odoacer Kingdom, Second Bulgar Empire, Tang Dynasty and Muhammad Ali Dynasty. There are also some states/Confederations that weren't Turks like Scythians, Xianbei and Rourans.
Big respect from Tatarstan! It's sad that we are not an independent country, unlike other kipchak or turkic people. But i wish we joined the Turkic club and Turan Union one day.
Rusya Türklerinin bağımsız olmak istediğini görüyorum. Eğer durum böyle ise Rusya için çanlar çalıyor :) Ayrıca Rusya'daki Türklerin bağımsız olması ile Kürdistan'ın bağımsız olması aynı şey değildir.
The Xianbei & Rourans likely were Para-Mongolic speakers related to the Khitans, the Northern Wei might've been Oghur Turkic, nonetheless brilliant work !
The first Turkic-speaking community appeared between 10,000 BC. and 9,000 BC. in South Central Asia (in today's Turkmenistan, near the Iranian border), namely Anav culture. Part of this community remained in this area until around 1,000 BC. while another part of the community around 5,000 BC. was distributed in the northern part of Central Asia and another part was distributed in regions such as Mesopotamia and Anatolia. The name of one of these communities in Anatolia and Mesopotamia was even called Turukku.
Bu turukku boyu işte sonra bu romalilarla falan savaşa savaşa baya insan kaybettiler ve göç etme zorunluğuna kalarak büyük taŋrı dağlarına sığınırlar ve orda kurt ile olan efsane ortaya çikar bu turukku yani artık özlerine turuk diyen bu boy sonra Göktürk kuracak olan boydur bu çinli Kaynaklarinda var lakin Turk diyecek yerine bunlar Aşina ismi vermişdirler aslinda aşina deyil Türktür bu boyun ismi. Bunlar türk ismini diğer Türkî kavimlere yani akrabaları Hun ve Iskit ogur boylarına vermiştir ve herkez Türk ismini benimsemiştir.
Bu turk isimleri zaten tarih boyunca çok değisik versiyonlarla iskit kavimleri bile kulanmiştir mesela Torquay kavmi Etruskler yani Etraak bugun araplar bile bize etraak derler. Turek toruk gibi bu isimler mevcutdu. Ama gelde tarihini ingilizin iranlinin eline veren türkiyeli tarihçilere anlat. Azerbaycanli turkler çok ileriye araştirmiştir sağ olsun
@@eren.mapping evet kardeşim. Birde gelelim türkiye meselesine. Bunlar sanarlar ki 1071'de türkler türkiye bölgesine ilk defa gelmişler. Fakat öyle değil. Binlerce seneler önce orta asya (anav) kökenli türk kavmi o bölgeye yerleşmiştir. Fakat birgün persler, romalılar ondan sonra yunanlılar bölgeyi ele geçirdiklerinde oradaki türkler çok uzun zamandır düşman kontröl altında yaşamışlardır. Ondan sonra başka bölgelerde yaşayan türklerin bazıları (mesela avrupa hunları) o bölgenin bir kısmını almıştır fakat birgün yine kaybetmişlerdir. Birgün sene olmuş 1071. Selçuklu türkleri bizanslılara karşı savaşıyor. Bizanslıların savaşta 4 kat fazla savaşçısı olduğu halde selçuklu türkleri savaşı kazanıp o bölgeyi resmen TÜRK YURDU yapmışlardır. Peki şimdi aklımızda bir soru var: "Türkler o az askerlerle nasıl kazandılar?" Ben size söyleyim efendim. Bizanslıların aralarında türkçe konuşan kişiler vardı ve onların ataları zaten binlerce seneler önce orta asyadan türkiye bölgesine gelmişlerdir. Selçuklu türklerinin türkçe konuştuğunu öğrenince ve dilleri onların dillerine andırdığını öğrenince, onlara yardım ettiler.
*_Hello! I am an Avar by nationality, I live in Dagestan! My great-grandmother on my mother’s side was an Ilisu Turkish (Azerbaijani!) Аnd my great-grandfather’s ancestors came from Turkey (Ottoman Empire!) I convey Salam to all Turcik from Avar!_* *_Здравствуйте! Я по национальности Аварец, живу в Дагестане! Моя прабабушка со стороны матери была Илисуйской Турчанкой (Азербайджанкой!) А предки моего прадеда были выходцами из Турции (Османской Империи!) Передаю Салам всем Тюркам от Аварца!_*
They got slavicized in time, Initially they were as turkic as the Göktürks. Turkic men have a crush on foreign women, and they were in no means rassist, the destiny of most of the empires they have built, was to mix up with its population if there was no turkic majority. Their warrior mentality was also a reason, why they got decimated .
ara sıra gelip videonu izliyorum atalarımla gurur duyuyorum ve tarih bilgimi esnetiyorum birkaç hata eksik var ama çokta önemli değil haritaların geneli çok iyi yapılmış araştırılmış eline sağlık esenlikler
For kind information, it is true that the Volga Bulgarians (Bolghar) were the first Turks to accept Islam, but the time of their acceptance was in 922. But your video is very wonderful and informative.
The video is fine, but just as a heads up for people not in Turanist/Pan-Turkic circles who stumbled on this, it is based in HEAVY historical revisionism. For example, if the Scythians were Turkic, as the video claims, then why did they speak what was unquestionably an Indo-European language? The evidence given (DNA, horse-milk, etc.) can easily be explained by the fact that the Proto-Indo-Europeans and Proto-Turkic peoples lived in the same area (the Eurasian steppe), probably intermingled, and likely practiced many of the same customs, given their environment.
Bro Scythians wear pants they was the first people to wear pants why romans and greeks or gaulish didnt wear it? They didnt know pants. And scythians was on horse and they was horse archers just like turkic People there is no other people who do that so why Romans or Germans didnt do the Horse archery ? Bro there is no Indo european language in the scythians why european historians says that scythians was the ancestor of magyars and Turkic people from 19th century to 1950s but after invented some bullshit aboute. Finno ugors and Turkic arent indo european they are both lied to the scythian civilisation if scythians was persian bro why they allways do war with median and persians why ? Why herodotes mentioned scythians as very différent people to them ? The scythians clothing is litteraly the todays kazakh and Tatars turkic traditional outfits especialy kazakhs. Show me one persian or one european civilisation that is war Lovers that is horse archers. No nothing. Scythians are our ancestor its make ridiculous when we heard that european or non civilised persian to tryng to apropriate these scyths. And the scythians artwork is the SAME with Gokturk golden artwork or steel works. But nothing to do with europeans. Scythians was nomadic show me one European or persian or indian nomadic civilisation (NOTHING) scythians was white yes was mixed with Q haplogroups when some of theme migrated to todays Mongolia to become Huns. Bro Turks have nothing with mongolians even our language have nothing but with Finno-ugriatic people we have a lot of commons. Bro Xiongnu's war style is the same with Scythians theyr clothing the way that they do Horse Archery etc.. etc.. even if europeans continue their bullshit aboute scythians we dont care bcz all of the response of these questions is front of your eyes. Scythians = Ancestor of Turkic people.....
@@eren.mapping "Bro Scythians wear pants they was the first people to wear pants why romans and greeks or gaulish didnt wear it? They didnt know pants." - Because the Scythians were not the ancestors of those groups, but they did share ancestry with them. "And scythians was on horse and they was horse archers just like turkic People there is no other people who do that so why Romans or Germans didnt do the Horse archery ?" - The Mongols were also horse archers, are they Turks? Also, the Parthians were undeniably Iranic and they were horse archers. "Bro there is no Indo european language in the scythians why european historians says that scythians was the ancestor of magyars and Turkic people from 19th century to 1950s but after invented some bullshit aboute." - The older scholars identified the Magyars and Turks as Scythians was due to geographical reasons, not linguistic ones. "Finno ugors and Turkic arent indo european they are both lied to the scythian civilisation if scythians was persian bro why they allways do war with median and persians why ?" - The Ottomans and the Afsharids were also at war various times yet both were of Turkic origin. Most of the other evidence you put can be easily explained by similar lifestyles and contact between the Scythians and the Turks. Anyways, Scythians = Genetic, but not linguistic ancestors of some Turkic peoples And Turan is an Iranic name, it's named after the mythical Tur, who was a son of the (also mythical) Iranian king Fereydun Diakonoff, I. M. (1999). The Paths of History. p. 100. "Turan was one of the nomadic Iranian tribes mentioned in the Avesta. However, in Firdousi's poem, and in the later Iranian tradition generally, the term Turan is perceived as denoting 'lands inhabited by Turkic speaking tribes.'"
The first Turkic Hydronyms we obtained from Chinese sources point to Scythian-Siberian cultures. The early Xiongnu and the Sakas are genetically close to this culture. This culture most likely comes from Andronovo. As Y-DNA, R1a M517 / Z93 is more and in the Q haplogroup there is a branch coming from botai, so it did not come from the east either. Scythians are a people who inherited Andronovo cultures, while Saka and Xiongnu came from Scythian Sibir. There are many Turkish words that we have obtained from the Scythians. There is a Turkish writing on the Esik Kurgan belonging to the Sakas. Sakas are also the Turkish people living in Yakutia today. The familiar dynasty that founded the Gokturk State is R1a-Z93 and Chinese sources say that they came from around the Caspian Sea, they came from the Turcai tribe of Sarmatian origin in that region. The Scythian alphabet (Esik Kurgan) is similar to the Turkish alphabet, and the Byzantine Historian Zemarkhos also says this. Not all Scythian and Saka tribes were Turks, there were also Iranians, and these Iranians were small tribes like Osseget. You cannot call the huge Scythian people Iranian by looking at these tribes. This does not mean that the Scythians in the Tarim Basin region were also Iranian. There is no direct y-DNA relationship between the Andronovo ancestor Corded Ware culture and the first Indo-European culture Yamnaya. It is true that Etruscan / Tyrrhenian languages are not Turkish, but there are words similar to Turkish. They most likely came from Corded Ware. The first Turks are the Sintaşta culture, the descendant of Corded Ware.
A good video though I have quite a few criticisms. I would leave out the Anav culture, Mannaeans and the Kelteminar as there is not enough evidence to show who these groups were. The Afanasievo were proto-Tocharians. The Andronovo Culture was Proto Indo-Iranian, though there may have been non Indo-Iranian groups in the northern peripheries. The Scythians, though there would’ve been Turkic elements in the wider cultural sphere, when talking about the Scythians as a ethnolinguistic group it is referring to a mostly east Iranic speaking population who have modern day descendants such as the Ossetians who are descended of Alans, Yagnobi who are descended of Sogdians and the Wakhi who speak a east Iranian language in the Pamir grouping (a grouping that is purely geographical) that is probably descended of Khotanese Saka. The Etruscans belong to a small language family including Rhaetic and the poorly attested Lemnian. The Cimmerians were an Indo-European group, most likely Iranic. The Sarmatians were an Iranic group. The Massagetae were also an Iranic group along with most of the Saka. The Wusun were most likely Indo-European. The Xiongnu were never that large. The Iazyges were Sarmatians. A few things around 3:17, the Wuhuan were Para-Mongolic, the Wusun were once again an Indo-European people and for some reason the Tarim basin is now Turkic. The Xianbei were Para-Mongolic though with large Turkic components. Tuyuhun was Xianbei could have been a Turkic Xianbei clan Could have been a Para-Mongolic one. The Donghu were also a Para-Mongolic group and they appeared much earlier than 238CE. The Rouran were a Para-Mongolic people. Former Liang was founded by a Han Chinese statesman. Later Zhao was founded by the Jie people whose ethnic and linguistic background is unknown. Now the Yeniseian are also being claimed as a Turkic group even though their language is completely unrelated. Magyars are a Uralic group not a Turkic one. 876 the kingdom of Khotan, an Iranic kingdom of Saka Scythian origin appears though it existed for much longer before being shown. Guiyi circuit is a Han Chinese state. The Sajids were most likely not Turkic though this is unclear. The Merkids were Mongols not Turkic. The Shirvanshahs were Iranic for most of their history; they only were Turkified later on. No more complaints and besides these points the video is excellent.
@@demirlord7817 Relying on genetic evidence to prove the cultural identity of a people group is stupid. While there can be and is crossover between the two it is not reliable. For instance most of my ancestors are Irish but I speak English, according to your reasoning the Irish are actually English and spoke English hundreds of years ago. While no one would deny that there is genetic and some cultural continuity between Turks and Scythians it can not be used to prove Scythian linguistic identity.
İskitler sadece Türkî kavimlerden oluşmuyor.Slavlar ve İraniler de var.Sadece Sakalar Türk.İlaveten Göktürklere "Turkish Khaganate" değil "Turkic Khaganate"demen gerekirdi zira "Turkish" ifadesi sadece Türkiye Türkleri için kullanılır.Onun haricinde güzel olmuş emeğine sağlık.
Sakalar ile İskitler arasında kültürel ve genetik fark yok ve bir sürü makale okudum batıdaki iskitlerden elde ettiğimiz Türkçe kelimeler var. Bu kadar nasıl net konuşabiliyorsunuz anlamıyorum ama İskit saka konfederasyonu içinde irani olabilir lakin slavic yok bunu savunanlar Ruslar gibi beyaz tenli olduğu için uyduruyor.
Batıdaki İskitlerin lideri Madyes Türk destanlarında ki Alp Er Tunga ve İran destanında Afrasyab dır. Afrasyab etimolojik olarak Alp Er Tunga iranileşmişi. Batıdaki İskitler genetik olarak ve y-dna olarak sakaları oluşturan İskit Sibir kültürlerine genetik yakınlık ve ortak soyluk çok yüksek
Chinese Northern Qi was not Turkic because the founder of Northern Qi was the Han (Chinese of local origin) Gao clan and even earlier, before the division of the unified Northern Wei, its Emperor Xiaowen, who ruled at the end of the 5th century, designed, that is, completed the Sinification of the north of modern China begun by his predecessors by adopting Chinese names (the ruling clan of the Tuoba tribe became the Yuan clan) *The affiliation of the Xianbei people to the Turkic peoples also causes a lot of controversy - rather, it was a somewhat separate pan-tribal formation
I like too correct you there was actually a brief Bulgarian state in Italy ruled by altsek for 20 years you could've add it that it would've been interesting there were as well as in Macedonia and Armenia
I think Genghis khan's empire should have been included. As it is part of our history. Especially considering that second person of the Empire Muqali was from Jalair tribe (which is Turkic). He received title Gowan or Goyon (great king in chinese). Also Uyghurs (turks) were given command over imperial bureaucracy. That is why cultural language of Yuan empire was Uyghur. "Mongol" khanates spoke to each other in Turki language (also known as Chagatai language). The letter of Guyuk khagan is a great example he sent a letter to Pope. The letter was in persian (for translation convenience) but preamble was in Turkic (official imperial language). Also Kipchak guard for several decades earned key power and influence over state matters in Yuan ulus during Tutuha and El Timur. After they were depraved of rights the Yuan empire collapsed instantly. The nationality of dynasty does not determine the identity of empire. If you look at Russian empire you will see they pretty much never had ethnically russian rulers. They had prussian, swedish, german dynasties, but it was always called Russian empire. Same principle should be applied here. Even though Genghiskhan did not speak Turki he pretty much forced his sons to learn it and he made Turki imperial language and chose Turki as imperial script (mongol script is Turkic naiman-uighur script actually).
@@eren.mappingYeah, that is why it should be included. If you look at Russian history they do not stop considering Russia is russian when Catherine the Great (german) or Peter Ulreich (german) or Stalin (georgian) rules Russia. I hope you got my point. Dynasty is german but empire is russian. Same here Genghis empire was turkic but dynasty was mongol am I clear? Genghis did not speak Turki but Ogedei did and later on moğol emperor's spoke Turki. I mean Turks have more to do with Mengü Ulus than with Avar or Xianbei.
There is no nation as brave and brave as the Turks. I respect them very much. Their history and achievements amaze me. I wish I were a Turk. Please don't forget to subscribe to this friend and press the like button.
I have two questions by watching the video; 1. Were Scythians Türkic? 2. Were the Alchon and the Hephthalite shared same rulers? Please share me if there are any sources can afford my curiousity. Rest of the video was totally amazed me greetings from S. Korea 🇹🇷❤🇰🇷 İnşallah!
1 - Only a few regions in the far east of the Scythian horizon spoke Turkic, the vast majority of the Scythians as a whole spoke Eastern Iranic 2 - Probably not
@@Nastya_07 i think there was 2 language speaking the proto Iranic and Proto turkic for being honest but the scythian culture was used by all Turkic States after
Eliniz sağlık güzel olmuş fakat belirtmek isterimki Altınorda haritası hatalı 9:07 çünkü o yıllarda kuzeykafkasyada volga nehri - kafkasdağları arasında Çerkesya ülkesi hakimdi (1427 - 1458) altınorda hakim değildi, Ayrıca Nogayların olduğu yerde yanlış! Batı kolu sadece kuban nehrinin güneyine küçük bir yere yerleşmişlerdir öyle Adigelerin yaşadığı yerlere hakim olmamışlardır! 1500 lü yıllarda balkar türklerinden ziyade Kabardeyler Kuzeykafkasyada en güçlü prenslikti balkarlar daha güneyde sarp dağlarda küçük bir bölgede yaşıyordu.
Kimmerlere takıldım. Bunlar ilk başta Türk değiller, İskitlerin geldiğini duyunca kendi aralarında iç savaş çıkıyor ve sonra İskitler tarafından asimile ediliyorlar diye biliyordum.
Hayir o halkların türkî halklarla pek bir baği yok biz moğollarla tunguzlarla Xamçadal'larla aslinda pek karışmiyoz iki teori var ya batıdan doğuya geldik yada gunumuzun urmu gölü çevredinden orta asya ya. Aksi halde moğolistanda boyle şıp diye ortaya çikmamiz çok buyuk bir saçmaliktir. Lakin şuda var eskimoların iglu dedikleri kardan evlerine baksak bizim klassik türk çadirlarina baya andırıyo öte yandan giyimleri filanda andırıyo kürklü filan. Bi tek onlarda at kültürü yok
@@eren.mapping Tanrı aciz değildir fakat insanlığa da etkisi yoktur. Milletimi asla Tanrılaştırmam çünkü temelinde bir insanız, demek istediğim gücümüzü ve kudretimizi kaybedip Türk devletlerinin yolsuzluk, yobazlık, cahillik ile mücadele etmeye çalışacak kadar aciziyete düşmesi acıdır.
Kardeşim history of Turanids every year yaparmısın? 1.) Turanid ırkın ortaya çıkması (Turanidler Caucasoid ve Mongoloid ana ırkların Orta Asya'da karışmış alt türüdür) 2.) Turanid ırkın bugüne kadar var olmuş iki kolu = Altay ve Ural 3.) İki kolun Milletleri. Altay = Türk, Moğol ve Tungus. Ural = Macar, Fin, Eston... ve diğerleri) ( 4.) Ve istersen Kenger, Etrüsk, Manna, Turukku, Kimmer... gibi eski Turani kavimleride koyabilirsin. Bu saydıklarım sadece Türklere yakın olanların birkaçtanesiydi.)
This list of qualities reads like a catalogue of all that he found wanting in the Persians he met.29 His view was that Persia had no real nobility; by that he ruled out the Turkman military élite which had monopolized all the pro- vincial governments and most of the important offices since Safavid rule began at the beginning of the sixteenth century. He was contemptuous of their aristocratic pretensions; their coarse, ignorant behaviour confirmed their origins as mere soldiers of fortune and Turkish at that. Persians-real Persians who lived under that intolerable subjection, and could trace their descent back beyond the Turkman supremacy-he saw in a different light.30 This was not simply a reflection of della Valle's snobbish concern with pedigree; there was still a marked distinction between these different elements in Safavid society. Pietro della Valle: The Limits of Perception J. D. Gurney Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London Vol. 49, No. 1, In Honour of Ann K. S. Lambton (1986), pp. 103-116 (14 pages) Published By: Cambridge University Press
Great, nevertheless, it still has a lot of mistakes, a lot of them shared with Kayra Atakan's video 1- We know nothing about the languages of the Anav and Kelteminar cultures. 2- The Mannaeans were probably Hurro-Urartian, maybe with some Kassite influence, nevertheless, nothing Turkic about them. 3- Despite it's proximity to the Proto-Turkic homeland, the Afanasievo culture was actually an Indo-European culture, proven by genetic connections between them and the Yamnaya, and it is likely that the Afanasievo brought the Proto-Tocharian language. 4- The consensus about the Andronovo culture is that they were Indo-Iranic, proven by ties with the Yamnaya and Corded Ware cultures. 5- The modern consensus is that the Scythians were in fact, Iranic, proven by Scythian names (of people, gods, places, etc.), medieval texts from Hotan and Tumxuk also prove that the Scythians were Iranic, similarities between the Scythians and the Turks could be explained by similar environments, contact and the fact that most Scythians were eventually assimilated by Turkic-speaking peoples. 6- The only accepted theory about the origin of the Etruscan is the Tyrsenian language family, which connects Etruscan with Rhaetian, Lemnian and possibly also Camunic. 7- The Wusun are generally regarded as an Indo-European people, most scholars seem to support the idea that the Wusun were Iranic, though others have also claimed that they were Tocharian or Indic. 8- Like the Scythians, the Sarmatians and their Iazyges tribe were Iranic, in fact, the modern Ossetian language is a descendant of the Sarmatian language, as the Alans were originally a tribe of the Sarmatians. 9- The Xianbei (except the Tuoba) were Khitano-Mongolic. 10- The Wuhuan were also Khitano-Mongolic, since they, like the Xianbei, descended from the Donghu. 11- The various city-states of the Tarim Basin were of Indo-European origin, the western ones spoke Scytho-Khotanese (Iranic) and the eastern ones spoke Tocharian (independent branch of IE). 12- The Shiwei were Khitano-Mongolic since they descended from the Xianbei and the Mongols derive from a Shiwei tribe. 13- The Tatabi were closely related to the Khitans, thus they were also Khitano-Mongolic. 14- Despite possible connections with the Turkic Pannonian Avars, the Rouran likely spoke a Khitano-Mongolic language, since they descended from the Donghu. 15- The Northern Yenissei and Assan Yenissei (I'm *not* referring to the Yenisei Kyrgyz btw) spoke Yeniseian languages, which are completely different from Turkic ones, also, the Northern Yenissei still exist as the Ket and Yugh (though the Ket language is moribund and the Yugh language is extinct). 16- The Arins and Pumpokols were also Yeniseian. Other than that, I would say some borders are a bit exaggerated, the First Bulgarian Empire and the Arpad dynasty could have been showed longer, the Alchon Huns were probably independent from the Hephthalites, the Zhongshan and state could have been included.
@@Nastya_07 btw the theory about the tuoba origin of Tang is actually not a theory but a historical fact. The tomb of Li Xian which was discovered in late 1980s or 1990s chanced everything For example Chen, Sanping (1996). "Succession Struggle and the Ethnic Identity of the Tang Imperial House". Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society. 6 (3): 381. ISSN 1356-1863. The official histories compiled during the Tang had been subjected to much political doctoring in order to mask and conceal the imperial house's "barbarian" background. The newest proof is the recent archaeological discovery showing that another contemporary prominent Li clan, namely that of Li Xian, the Northern Zhou Grand General with the same Longxi ancestry claim, was in fact of unmistakable Tuoba Xianbei descent.
![ลองสุ่มไอโฟน 990 โกงมั้ย? [ โกงมั้ยครับ ep.101 ] | DOM](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/bfsWe0j492k/mqdefault.jpg)
![[TH] 2024 PMGC League | Survival Stage วันที่ 1 | PUBG MOBILE Global Championship](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/FVFT-PFwU80/mqdefault.jpg)
Kardeşlerim burada bizim Iskit atalarimiza Hun atalarimiza sahiplenmeye çalışıyorlar onlara kaynaklarla atasız olmadığımızı gösterelim yaşasın Türk milleti yaşasın Turan birliği ❤
Tengri Türkü korusun 🇹🇷🇦🇿🇰🇿🇺🇿🇹🇲🇰🇬
İskitler İran'ın bir halkıdır. Türk değil
Umarım bu görüş 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖐 𝕯𝖚𝖓𝖞𝖆𝖘ı𝖓𝖉𝖆 her geçen gün büyür . ki büyümekte, sizin gibi atalarını korumaya çalışan 𝓣𝓾𝓻𝓴𝓵𝓮𝓻 sayesinde. Video çok güzel fakat İskitlerde 50 ila 100 yıllık bir kayma olmuş yinede muhteşem uğraşılmış emek verilmiş bir video elinize sağlık efenim.
Abi baştaki ilk müzik çok güzel ismi ne?
yorumlarda avrupalı ve ortadoğulu eziklerin türk tarihini fakirleştirmeye çalıştığını çok net görüyoruz. kendi ezik tarihleri kukla olmaktan öteye gidemediği için tabii.
Aferin kardeşim baya iyi iş çıkarmışsın, videoda bir az hatalar var ama yinede kaliteli ve mükemmel olmuş 👍
🇦🇿🇹🇲🇺🇿🇰🇿🇭🇺🇰🇬🇹🇷❤
Sağolasin kardaşim🇦🇿🇹🇷🇰🇬🇰🇿🇺🇿🇰🇿🇹🇲
Afshar səni hər yerdə görürəm 😎🤘
My favorite top 10 turkic empires
1. Ottoman empire
2.Mamluk sultanate
3.Mughal empire
4.Seljuk empire
5. Delhi Sultanate
6. Gaznavid empire
7.Timured empire
8.the golden horde empire
9.Zengid Dynasty
10.seljuk of Rum
Big respect to my turkish friends❤
Thank you 🤌🏻 where are you from ?
@@eren.mapping Im from Palastine 🇵🇸
@@harshusien5382 good 🤝💚
Gerçekten mükemmel bir video kardeşim❤
selijuk and gaznavid is iranian turk wtf not turkish
Selam aleyküm oğuz kardeşler ... başkurt'tan🇹🇷
Ve aleykum selam
aleyküm selam kan kardeşim. Türkiye'den
Uğraşını büyük bir içtenlikle tebrik ediyorum, inanılmazsın 👏👏👏
Çok sağolun
Salam Aleikum har Türk karnashlarima Karaçay milletden✋
Va aleikum Salam kardashim
İnşallah İran Türkleri bağımsızlığına kavuşur
@@toprakturan4290 inşallah
Yeni Kayra Atakan olabilecek kalitede bi kanal hemen takip ediyorum cok iyi video
The states of Zongshan and Yueban were also among the early Turkic polities
Zhongshan not. The "Beidi" mentioned is different from the Northern Barbarian one. But there are many missing like Kingdom of Yiqu, Odoacer Kingdom, Second Bulgar Empire, Tang Dynasty and Muhammad Ali Dynasty. There are also some states/Confederations that weren't Turks like Scythians, Xianbei and Rourans.
Abi güzel olmuş,ellerin dert görmesin, bi dahakine Alternatif Türk Tarihini bekleriz veya Mapping videolarının yapımını....
Sağol Can
its about time. and it is next level. this is amazing
Thank youu
Love from Pakistan
Turks are also in Pakistan hazara community and in kpk and Punjab ❤
Please make video on Gujjars
Video cok guzel ellerine saglik
Türkmenistandan selam
Ve aleykum selam gardaşım 🇹🇲🇦🇿🇹🇷
Türkenistanda youtube yok💀
n*
Big respect from Tatarstan!
It's sad that we are not an independent country, unlike other kipchak or turkic people. But i wish we joined the Turkic club and Turan Union one day.
I wish too brother
All that from the second kaganate is the Mongols, not the Kipchaks. Modern Central Asia is empty.
Rusya Türklerinin bağımsız olmak istediğini görüyorum. Eğer durum böyle ise Rusya için çanlar çalıyor :) Ayrıca Rusya'daki Türklerin bağımsız olması ile Kürdistan'ın bağımsız olması aynı şey değildir.
Are you volga Bulgars or tatars?
@@originalw01theonlyone no, i am volga tatar. I live in Kazan
çok güzel olmuş ellerine sağlık
The Xianbei & Rourans likely were Para-Mongolic speakers related to the Khitans, the Northern Wei might've been Oghur Turkic, nonetheless brilliant work !
The first Turkic-speaking community appeared between 10,000 BC. and 9,000 BC. in South Central Asia (in today's Turkmenistan, near the Iranian border), namely Anav culture. Part of this community remained in this area until around 1,000 BC. while another part of the community around 5,000 BC. was distributed in the northern part of Central Asia and another part was distributed in regions such as Mesopotamia and Anatolia. The name of one of these communities in Anatolia and Mesopotamia was even called Turukku.
Işte buuu aslanım benim
Bu turukku boyu işte sonra bu romalilarla falan savaşa savaşa baya insan kaybettiler ve göç etme zorunluğuna kalarak büyük taŋrı dağlarına sığınırlar ve orda kurt ile olan efsane ortaya çikar bu turukku yani artık özlerine turuk diyen bu boy sonra Göktürk kuracak olan boydur bu çinli Kaynaklarinda var lakin Turk diyecek yerine bunlar Aşina ismi vermişdirler aslinda aşina deyil Türktür bu boyun ismi. Bunlar türk ismini diğer Türkî kavimlere yani akrabaları Hun ve Iskit ogur boylarına vermiştir ve herkez Türk ismini benimsemiştir.
Bu turk isimleri zaten tarih boyunca çok değisik versiyonlarla iskit kavimleri bile kulanmiştir mesela Torquay kavmi Etruskler yani Etraak bugun araplar bile bize etraak derler. Turek toruk gibi bu isimler mevcutdu. Ama gelde tarihini ingilizin iranlinin eline veren türkiyeli tarihçilere anlat. Azerbaycanli turkler çok ileriye araştirmiştir sağ olsun
@@eren.mapping evet kardeşim. Birde gelelim türkiye meselesine. Bunlar sanarlar ki 1071'de türkler türkiye bölgesine ilk defa gelmişler. Fakat öyle değil. Binlerce seneler önce orta asya (anav) kökenli türk kavmi o bölgeye yerleşmiştir. Fakat birgün persler, romalılar ondan sonra yunanlılar bölgeyi ele geçirdiklerinde oradaki türkler çok uzun zamandır düşman kontröl altında yaşamışlardır. Ondan sonra başka bölgelerde yaşayan türklerin bazıları (mesela avrupa hunları) o bölgenin bir kısmını almıştır fakat birgün yine kaybetmişlerdir. Birgün sene olmuş 1071. Selçuklu türkleri bizanslılara karşı savaşıyor. Bizanslıların savaşta 4 kat fazla savaşçısı olduğu halde selçuklu türkleri savaşı kazanıp o bölgeyi resmen TÜRK YURDU yapmışlardır. Peki şimdi aklımızda bir soru var: "Türkler o az askerlerle nasıl kazandılar?" Ben size söyleyim efendim. Bizanslıların aralarında türkçe konuşan kişiler vardı ve onların ataları zaten binlerce seneler önce orta asyadan türkiye bölgesine gelmişlerdir. Selçuklu türklerinin türkçe konuştuğunu öğrenince ve dilleri onların dillerine andırdığını öğrenince, onlara yardım ettiler.
No they didnt, proto turkic people came from Ancient North East Asians in modern day manchuria
Çok kaliteli olmuş. Umarım hak ettiğin yerlere gelirsin.
*_Hello! I am an Avar by nationality, I live in Dagestan! My great-grandmother on my mother’s side was an Ilisu Turkish (Azerbaijani!) Аnd my great-grandfather’s ancestors came from Turkey (Ottoman Empire!) I convey Salam to all Turcik from Avar!_*
*_Здравствуйте! Я по национальности Аварец, живу в Дагестане! Моя прабабушка со стороны матери была Илисуйской Турчанкой (Азербайджанкой!) А предки моего прадеда были выходцами из Турции (Османской Империи!) Передаю Салам всем Тюркам от Аварца!_*
Hello moy avar brada
@@eren.mappingЧто?
Привет. Приятно видеть Авара
That means you are half-Turkic and half-Caucasus Native (your Avar side isn't Pannonian Avar).
Aleykümselam my brother ❤
@@WorldHistory_Game I already said you are not Pannonian Avar :D
Super vidéo !
Proposition pour une vidéo alternative: sur les Occitans/Provençaux voire même les Catalans.
Biensure pourquoi pas
Video çox gözəl alınıb həqiqətən əməyinə sağlıq Azərbaycanlısan bu arada?
Çox sağ olun Yox Türkiyeliyəm Qardaşım
Çok yardımcı olan bu şeyler için teşekkür ederim❤
great video as always
sonunda iskitleri de ekleyen birini gordum. gercek Turk tarihini yaymaya devam dostum. helal olsun
Baya kaliteli ve güzel. emeğine, ömrüne sağlık, esenlikler
Sağol canim benim şeref verdin, allah da seni mutlu etsin....
Despite the fact that Bulgaria is not considered turkic it can't seem to escape it
The name only. But Bulgarians are very différent from other south slavic group they have their own culture
@@eren.mapping as bulgarian we have our own culture, but i say we consider as: Slavic and Turkic!
@@BRP_Does_IDK 🤝💙
@@eren.mapping 🇧🇬🤝💙
They got slavicized in time, Initially they were as turkic as the Göktürks. Turkic men have a crush on foreign women, and they were in no means rassist, the destiny of most of the empires they have built, was to mix up with its population if there was no turkic majority. Their warrior mentality was also a reason, why they got decimated .
Hello from Azerbaijan 🇦🇿
I am half Turkish and half Italian but my heart only beats for the Turkish flag 🇹🇷
🇹🇷🇮🇹🇹🇷🇮🇹
ara sıra gelip videonu izliyorum atalarımla gurur duyuyorum ve tarih bilgimi esnetiyorum birkaç hata eksik var ama çokta önemli değil haritaların geneli çok iyi yapılmış araştırılmış eline sağlık esenlikler
@@ORHAN-g5w esenlikler sağolasin can aqayım
Çok başarılı harita ve grafikler de harika. Ama müzik seçimi daha iyi olabilirmiş, daha ağır ve daha Türki müzikler mesela
Nice ❤😊
Love your videos man 🤩
*Çok zahmetli iştir Tebrikler*
Good 👍😊👏👏👏👏
I am Hazara from Afghanistan ,I love all of turkic people
❤
Tebrikler Eren Abi. Harika Olmuş ❤
Çok Güzel Bir Video Alınmış!👍
Alinmiş?
Sağol can
@@eren.mapping Yani Azerbaycancada Olmuş Demek
@@azerbaijanmapper6658 pek ala sağolun qardaşim 💚💚💚
Salam olsun Bütün Türk qardaşlarıma 🤘🐺🇦🇿🇹🇷🇰🇿🇺🇿🇰🇬🇭🇺🇹🇲🐺🤘
For kind information, it is true that the Volga Bulgarians (Bolghar) were the first Turks to accept Islam, but the time of their acceptance was in 922.
But your video is very wonderful and informative.
Çok kaliteli olmuş umarım hak ettiği yerlere gelirsin
MÜKEMMEL❤
Damn Bro Very good video, You're New Kayra Atakan 💖
Sağolasin bu arada bende türküm
Galiba yanıtım Silinmiş, Sana Kendi Discord Sunucumdan Ufak bi Yardım gönderdim (:
@@EnfeMapping çok sağolun tek gayemiz türklük için 😊
Maşa Allah
Kardeşim harika bir video olmuş eline sağlık ama keşke Rusya içerisindeki Türk cumhuriyetlerini de koysaydın
Çok iyi olmuş eline sağlık
Profil resmin fena guzelmis ❤
@@eren.mapping 2 yıldır öyle. Seninde iyi altın orda mı seninki ?
The video is fine, but just as a heads up for people not in Turanist/Pan-Turkic circles who stumbled on this, it is based in HEAVY historical revisionism.
For example, if the Scythians were Turkic, as the video claims, then why did they speak what was unquestionably an Indo-European language? The evidence given (DNA, horse-milk, etc.) can easily be explained by the fact that the Proto-Indo-Europeans and Proto-Turkic peoples lived in the same area (the Eurasian steppe), probably intermingled, and likely practiced many of the same customs, given their environment.
Bro Scythians wear pants they was the first people to wear pants why romans and greeks or gaulish didnt wear it? They didnt know pants. And scythians was on horse and they was horse archers just like turkic People there is no other people who do that so why Romans or Germans didnt do the Horse archery ? Bro there is no Indo european language in the scythians why european historians says that scythians was the ancestor of magyars and Turkic people from 19th century to 1950s but after invented some bullshit aboute. Finno ugors and Turkic arent indo european they are both lied to the scythian civilisation if scythians was persian bro why they allways do war with median and persians why ? Why herodotes mentioned scythians as very différent people to them ? The scythians clothing is litteraly the todays kazakh and Tatars turkic traditional outfits especialy kazakhs. Show me one persian or one european civilisation that is war Lovers that is horse archers. No nothing. Scythians are our ancestor its make ridiculous when we heard that european or non civilised persian to tryng to apropriate these scyths. And the scythians artwork is the SAME with Gokturk golden artwork or steel works. But nothing to do with europeans. Scythians was nomadic show me one European or persian or indian nomadic civilisation (NOTHING) scythians was white yes was mixed with Q haplogroups when some of theme migrated to todays Mongolia to become Huns. Bro Turks have nothing with mongolians even our language have nothing but with Finno-ugriatic people we have a lot of commons. Bro Xiongnu's war style is the same with Scythians theyr clothing the way that they do Horse Archery etc.. etc.. even if europeans continue their bullshit aboute scythians we dont care bcz all of the response of these questions is front of your eyes. Scythians = Ancestor of Turkic people.....
Bro even Medians called scythians as "Turans" word used today for the Turk countries union name
@@eren.mapping "Bro Scythians wear pants they was the first people to wear pants why romans and greeks or gaulish didnt wear it? They didnt know pants."
- Because the Scythians were not the ancestors of those groups, but they did share ancestry with them.
"And scythians was on horse and they was horse archers just like turkic People there is no other people who do that so why Romans or Germans didnt do the Horse archery ?"
- The Mongols were also horse archers, are they Turks? Also, the Parthians were undeniably Iranic and they were horse archers.
"Bro there is no Indo european language in the scythians why european historians says that scythians was the ancestor of magyars and Turkic people from 19th century to 1950s but after invented some bullshit aboute."
- The older scholars identified the Magyars and Turks as Scythians was due to geographical reasons, not linguistic ones.
"Finno ugors and Turkic arent indo european they are both lied to the scythian civilisation if scythians was persian bro why they allways do war with median and persians why ?"
- The Ottomans and the Afsharids were also at war various times yet both were of Turkic origin.
Most of the other evidence you put can be easily explained by similar lifestyles and contact between the Scythians and the Turks.
Anyways, Scythians = Genetic, but not linguistic ancestors of some Turkic peoples
And Turan is an Iranic name, it's named after the mythical Tur, who was a son of the (also mythical) Iranian king Fereydun
Diakonoff, I. M. (1999). The Paths of History. p. 100. "Turan was one of the nomadic Iranian tribes mentioned in the Avesta. However, in Firdousi's poem, and in the later Iranian tradition generally, the term Turan is perceived as denoting 'lands inhabited by Turkic speaking tribes.'"
The first Turkic Hydronyms we obtained from Chinese sources point to Scythian-Siberian cultures. The early Xiongnu and the Sakas are genetically close to this culture.
This culture most likely comes from Andronovo. As Y-DNA, R1a M517 / Z93 is more and in the Q haplogroup there is a branch coming from botai, so it did not come from the east either.
Scythians are a people who inherited Andronovo cultures, while Saka and Xiongnu came from Scythian Sibir.
There are many Turkish words that we have obtained from the Scythians.
There is a Turkish writing on the Esik Kurgan belonging to the Sakas.
Sakas are also the Turkish people living in Yakutia today.
The familiar dynasty that founded the Gokturk State is R1a-Z93 and Chinese sources say that they came from around the Caspian Sea, they came from the Turcai tribe of Sarmatian origin in that region.
The Scythian alphabet (Esik Kurgan) is similar to the Turkish alphabet, and the Byzantine Historian Zemarkhos also says this.
Not all Scythian and Saka tribes were Turks, there were also Iranians, and these Iranians were small tribes like Osseget. You cannot call the huge Scythian people Iranian by looking at these tribes. This does not mean that the Scythians in the Tarim Basin region were also Iranian.
There is no direct y-DNA relationship between the Andronovo ancestor Corded Ware culture and the first Indo-European culture Yamnaya.
It is true that Etruscan / Tyrrhenian languages are not Turkish, but there are words similar to Turkish. They most likely came from Corded Ware. The first Turks are the Sintaşta culture, the descendant of Corded Ware.
eline koluna sağlık kardesim texastan selmalar sevigller
@@ilker5710 sağol canim benim cansin
Thankfully History ❤👍😊👏👏👏👏
I had no idea that the avars had a nation in Mongolia first before arriving in Europe
Ther is à lot of prononciation like Apar, Ruan Ruan Yuan Yuan Rouran or just asian Avars
Aga bir de hunlar iki romayi vassal yapıyor, akhunlar ise sasanileri ve guptalari vassal yapıyor. Onlarida koysan güzel olurdu.
gerçek türk tarihi budur evet selam olsun turana🐺🤘🏻
A good video though I have quite a few criticisms. I would leave out the Anav culture, Mannaeans and the Kelteminar as there is not enough evidence to show who these groups were. The Afanasievo were proto-Tocharians. The Andronovo Culture was Proto Indo-Iranian, though there may have been non Indo-Iranian groups in the northern peripheries. The Scythians, though there would’ve been Turkic elements in the wider cultural sphere, when talking about the Scythians as a ethnolinguistic group it is referring to a mostly east Iranic speaking population who have modern day descendants such as the Ossetians who are descended of Alans, Yagnobi who are descended of Sogdians and the Wakhi who speak a east Iranian language in the Pamir grouping (a grouping that is purely geographical) that is probably descended of Khotanese Saka. The Etruscans belong to a small language family including Rhaetic and the poorly attested Lemnian. The Cimmerians were an Indo-European group, most likely Iranic. The Sarmatians were an Iranic group. The Massagetae were also an Iranic group along with most of the Saka. The Wusun were most likely Indo-European. The Xiongnu were never that large. The Iazyges were Sarmatians. A few things around 3:17, the Wuhuan were Para-Mongolic, the Wusun were once again an Indo-European people and for some reason the Tarim basin is now Turkic. The Xianbei were Para-Mongolic though with large Turkic components. Tuyuhun was Xianbei could have been a Turkic Xianbei clan Could have been a Para-Mongolic one. The Donghu were also a Para-Mongolic group and they appeared much earlier than 238CE. The Rouran were a Para-Mongolic people. Former Liang was founded by a Han Chinese statesman. Later Zhao was founded by the Jie people whose ethnic and linguistic background is unknown. Now the Yeniseian are also being claimed as a Turkic group even though their language is completely unrelated. Magyars are a Uralic group not a Turkic one. 876 the kingdom of Khotan, an Iranic kingdom of Saka Scythian origin appears though it existed for much longer before being shown. Guiyi circuit is a Han Chinese state. The Sajids were most likely not Turkic though this is unclear. The Merkids were Mongols not Turkic. The Shirvanshahs were Iranic for most of their history; they only were Turkified later on. No more complaints and besides these points the video is excellent.
Arpad Dynasty 🇭🇺= Turks / Hunnic
Şaka - Scythian= İranic 😂, Propaganda
Scythian= %70+ R1a-Z93
R1a-Z93 ≠ Yamnaya
Saka, Early Xiongnu= Scythian Sibirian Culture ( Y-DNA R1a M517 / Z93 , Q ,N Haplogroup)
R1b = Yamnaya
@@demirlord7817 Relying on genetic evidence to prove the cultural identity of a people group is stupid. While there can be and is crossover between the two it is not reliable. For instance most of my ancestors are Irish but I speak English, according to your reasoning the Irish are actually English and spoke English hundreds of years ago. While no one would deny that there is genetic and some cultural continuity between Turks and Scythians it can not be used to prove Scythian linguistic identity.
@@spacebunny4335
Bro they are pan turkist people try to claim mystery civilizations because they are without civilization among history
"Yay tutan bütün budunları(halk) Hun yaptım!"
~Metehan
Gerçekten güzel eline sağlık
Top 5 my favourite Turkic empire
1.xiongnu
2.hephtalites
3.asian avar khaganate
4.uyghur khaganate
5:Kyrgyz khanate
Alt köşedeki animasyon nedir? Muhteşem görünüyor 9:35
İskitler sadece Türkî kavimlerden oluşmuyor.Slavlar ve İraniler de var.Sadece Sakalar Türk.İlaveten Göktürklere "Turkish Khaganate" değil "Turkic Khaganate"demen gerekirdi zira "Turkish" ifadesi sadece Türkiye Türkleri için kullanılır.Onun haricinde güzel olmuş emeğine sağlık.
Sakalar ile İskitler arasında kültürel ve genetik fark yok ve bir sürü makale okudum batıdaki iskitlerden elde ettiğimiz Türkçe kelimeler var.
Bu kadar nasıl net konuşabiliyorsunuz anlamıyorum ama İskit saka konfederasyonu içinde irani olabilir lakin slavic yok bunu savunanlar Ruslar gibi beyaz tenli olduğu için uyduruyor.
Batıdaki İskitlerin lideri Madyes Türk destanlarında ki Alp Er Tunga ve İran destanında Afrasyab dır.
Afrasyab etimolojik olarak Alp Er Tunga iranileşmişi. Batıdaki İskitler genetik olarak ve y-dna olarak sakaları oluşturan İskit Sibir kültürlerine genetik yakınlık ve ortak soyluk çok yüksek
@@demirlord7817 alp er tunga öz türktür
Türk çoğunluklu diyelim biz ona. Özellikle Herodot'un söylediklerine bakarsak batı kanadı kesinlikle Türk.
Sakalar İrani
Before kubrat There were other rulers like Albury Hudbard and Organa But i understand why you didn't include them
Chinese Northern Qi was not Turkic because the founder of Northern Qi was the Han (Chinese of local origin) Gao clan and even earlier, before the division of the unified Northern Wei, its Emperor Xiaowen, who ruled at the end of the 5th century, designed, that is, completed the Sinification of the north of modern China begun by his predecessors by adopting Chinese names (the ruling clan of the Tuoba tribe became the Yuan clan)
*The affiliation of the Xianbei people to the Turkic peoples also causes a lot of controversy - rather, it was a somewhat separate pan-tribal formation
Siyenbes were a Turkish tribal state, I have evidence, don't talk,
The Northern Wei Dynasty has no relations with the Chinese because they are of Tabgach origin.
Sit at home and watch your anime, brat, because you don't understand history..
They are pan turkists bro they have nothing to konw about history
Can you do history of the world every year please
I like too correct you there was actually a brief Bulgarian state in Italy ruled by altsek for 20 years you could've add it that it would've been interesting there were as well as in Macedonia and Armenia
Wow in armenia too ? Interesting
@@eren.mapping Khan Vund
@@originalw01theonlyone i heard about yes interesting
@@eren.mapping you should contact hetmate mapping for information on that
@@eren.mapping You don't know about Bulgarian commanders right? Like Marmais Iratais Sigritsa Sursuvul And Ahtum?
I understated the Turkish history
🇹🇷💙🇮🇹 sto molto piace il populo Italian
Kardiş helal et Lejant'ını çalıyorum .d
Çal yeğenim
Sen bu işte marka haline gelmeden önce iyiki bulmuşum seni. 🐺🤘
Çok başarılı video
I think Genghis khan's empire should have been included. As it is part of our history. Especially considering that second person of the Empire Muqali was from Jalair tribe (which is Turkic). He received title Gowan or Goyon (great king in chinese). Also Uyghurs (turks) were given command over imperial bureaucracy.
That is why cultural language of Yuan empire was Uyghur. "Mongol" khanates spoke to each other in Turki language (also known as Chagatai language).
The letter of Guyuk khagan is a great example he sent a letter to Pope. The letter was in persian (for translation convenience) but preamble was in Turkic (official imperial language).
Also Kipchak guard for several decades earned key power and influence over state matters in Yuan ulus during Tutuha and El Timur. After they were depraved of rights the Yuan empire collapsed instantly.
The nationality of dynasty does not determine the identity of empire. If you look at Russian empire you will see they pretty much never had ethnically russian rulers. They had prussian, swedish, german dynasties, but it was always called Russian empire.
Same principle should be applied here. Even though Genghiskhan did not speak Turki he pretty much forced his sons to learn it and he made Turki imperial language and chose Turki as imperial script (mongol script is Turkic naiman-uighur script actually).
Genghis khan is mongolian and à great mongol national hero doesnt have nothing with turk only in army turks was dominantly
@@eren.mappingYeah, that is why it should be included. If you look at Russian history they do not stop considering Russia is russian when Catherine the Great (german) or Peter Ulreich (german) or Stalin (georgian) rules Russia. I hope you got my point.
Dynasty is german but empire is russian. Same here Genghis empire was turkic but dynasty was mongol am I clear?
Genghis did not speak Turki but Ogedei did and later on moğol emperor's spoke Turki.
I mean Turks have more to do with Mengü Ulus than with Avar or Xianbei.
In the first half of 19 century kokand khante was the biggest state in central asia but here is probalbly smallest one
Reis senin yanlış hatırlamıyorsam osmanlı her yıl videon vardı baya ayrıntılıydı o. Onu tekrar yükleyebilirmisin?
There is no nation as brave and brave as the Turks. I respect them very much. Their history and achievements amaze me. I wish I were a Turk. Please don't forget to subscribe to this friend and press the like button.
Thank you Hazbik 💙🤍💙
There seems to be a lot less turk nations now than in the past
Thanks to Russia and china 😢
Siyenpileri ve Rouran Kağanlığını Moğol olarak biliyorum.
I have two questions by watching the video;
1. Were Scythians Türkic?
2. Were the Alchon and the Hephthalite shared same rulers?
Please share me if there are any sources can afford my curiousity. Rest of the video was totally amazed me greetings from S. Korea 🇹🇷❤🇰🇷
İnşallah!
Come to instagram eren.map im gonna say you 🇰🇷💚🇹🇷🤝
1 - Only a few regions in the far east of the Scythian horizon spoke Turkic, the vast majority of the Scythians as a whole spoke Eastern Iranic
2 - Probably not
@@Nastya_07 i think there was 2 language speaking the proto Iranic and Proto turkic for being honest but the scythian culture was used by all Turkic States after
Super
Kaşgar Emirliği Osmanlının bir vassalı idi Açe gibi Heşaş olsun ellerine sağlık
😊
Alternativ türk tarihide yaparsan iyi olur bunun üzerine iyi gider
Every shanyu of scythians
Alp er tunga,tomris hatun
Most of the cultures you showed weren't Turkic or Proto-Turkic. Here are the real Turkic/Proto Turkic cultures;
Serovo Culture
(BC3500-BC2500)
Khemsteg Culture
(BC2600-BC2000)
Glazkov Culture
(BC2200-BC1200)
Sjiverskaya Culture
(BC2000-BC1000)
Munkhkairkhan Culture
(BC1800-BC1600)
Sagsai Culture
(BC1500-BC1000)
Ulaanzukh-Tevsh Culture
(BC1450-BC1000)
Deer Stones-Khirigsuur Culture
(BC1400-BC700)
Slab Grave Culture
(BC1300-BC300)
Majemir Culture
(BC900-BC??)
Tasmola Culture
(BC800-BC300)
Pazyryk Culture
(BC500-BC200)
Korgantas Culture
(BC400-BC113)
Kokel Culture
(100-400)
Eliniz sağlık güzel olmuş fakat belirtmek isterimki Altınorda haritası hatalı 9:07 çünkü o yıllarda kuzeykafkasyada volga nehri - kafkasdağları arasında Çerkesya ülkesi hakimdi (1427 - 1458) altınorda hakim değildi,
Ayrıca Nogayların olduğu yerde yanlış! Batı kolu sadece kuban nehrinin güneyine küçük bir yere yerleşmişlerdir öyle Adigelerin yaşadığı yerlere hakim olmamışlardır!
1500 lü yıllarda balkar türklerinden ziyade Kabardeyler Kuzeykafkasyada en güçlü prenslikti balkarlar daha güneyde sarp dağlarda küçük bir bölgede yaşıyordu.
underrated
muq olmus👍
Azerbaycandan Salamlar.Yasasin Azerbaycan Tarixi.Yasasin Turk tarixi!
@@ddraigexe yaşasın bizi qardas eden qanimiza can
Kimmerlere takıldım. Bunlar ilk başta Türk değiller, İskitlerin geldiğini duyunca kendi aralarında iç savaş çıkıyor ve sonra İskitler tarafından asimile ediliyorlar diye biliyordum.
I have learned so many new things my brain might pop
Mehmet reşat ın resmini bana bir yerden yollama şansın varmı?
👍👍👍👍👍
Bir videoda da Eftalitlerin Sasani vassallarını ekleyin be artık
Yorumunuz için sağolun bu konu hakinda araştirma yaparim
@@eren.mapping kaynak atabilirim iserseniz kaliteli üniversiteler ve yabancı kaynaklardan
@@eren.mapping Hocam Tanshihuai’ın fotoğrafını nereden buldunuz lazım bana?
reis buralarda mıydın :)
@@mergen_kagan yok canim degildim
Abi eksik tarih olmuş Kuzey amerikaya bir ara ayak bastık koysan iyi olurdu
Hayir o halkların türkî halklarla pek bir baği yok biz moğollarla tunguzlarla Xamçadal'larla aslinda pek karışmiyoz iki teori var ya batıdan doğuya geldik yada gunumuzun urmu gölü çevredinden orta asya ya. Aksi halde moğolistanda boyle şıp diye ortaya çikmamiz çok buyuk bir saçmaliktir. Lakin şuda var eskimoların iglu dedikleri kardan evlerine baksak bizim klassik türk çadirlarina baya andırıyo öte yandan giyimleri filanda andırıyo kürklü filan. Bi tek onlarda at kültürü yok
Ama evet bu Kuzey amerika yerli halkları bizim sibir türklerine baya benzeyir
0:31 Manna🇦🇿❤💪
In Bulgaria we still remember mete khan and call him mode Mod-Eh
Interesting yes in some source his name is Modun, Modu, maodun, Mete,
@eren.mapping Have you ever heard of Ziezi Ahil Peperud Ildirik, Bladilii Kolad Brem and Lado?
@@originalw01theonlyone nope ? Dont know
@@eren.mapping these are mythical Bulgarian rulers
@@originalw01theonlyone so if they are existed in east asia they aren't mythical 😂 they are real.
YES BOIIIII LETSSSSSSSD GOOOOO
Tarihte şöyle bir alana yayılıp Asya, Avrupa ve Afrika kıtasında sayısız devlet kurup yönetmiş milletin aciziyette olması harbi üzücü.
Insan acizdir hiç bir millet kutsal tanrisal değildirki aciz olmasin aciz olmayan bir tek vardır bilen bildi
@@eren.mapping Tanrı aciz değildir fakat insanlığa da etkisi yoktur. Milletimi asla Tanrılaştırmam çünkü temelinde bir insanız, demek istediğim gücümüzü ve kudretimizi kaybedip Türk devletlerinin yolsuzluk, yobazlık, cahillik ile mücadele etmeye çalışacak kadar aciziyete düşmesi acıdır.
Very cool👍👍👍👍👍
Can you make history of slavs?
10:46 Қазағымның әнұраны 😊😊
Kardeşim history of Turanids every year yaparmısın?
1.) Turanid ırkın ortaya çıkması (Turanidler Caucasoid ve Mongoloid ana ırkların Orta Asya'da karışmış alt türüdür)
2.) Turanid ırkın bugüne kadar var olmuş iki kolu = Altay ve Ural
3.) İki kolun Milletleri. Altay = Türk, Moğol ve Tungus. Ural = Macar, Fin, Eston... ve diğerleri)
( 4.) Ve istersen Kenger, Etrüsk, Manna, Turukku, Kimmer... gibi eski Turani kavimleride koyabilirsin. Bu saydıklarım sadece Türklere yakın olanların birkaçtanesiydi.)
This list of qualities reads like a catalogue of all that he found wanting in the Persians he met.29 His view was that Persia had no real nobility; by that he ruled out the Turkman military élite which had monopolized all the pro- vincial governments and most of the important offices since Safavid rule began at the beginning of the sixteenth century. He was contemptuous of their aristocratic pretensions; their coarse, ignorant behaviour confirmed their origins as mere soldiers of fortune and Turkish at that. Persians-real Persians who lived under that intolerable subjection, and could trace their descent back beyond the Turkman supremacy-he saw in a different light.30 This was not simply a reflection of della Valle's snobbish concern with pedigree; there was still a marked distinction between these different elements in Safavid society.
Pietro della Valle: The Limits of Perception J. D. Gurney Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London Vol. 49, No. 1, In Honour of Ann K. S. Lambton (1986), pp. 103-116 (14 pages) Published By: Cambridge University Press
Great, nevertheless, it still has a lot of mistakes, a lot of them shared with Kayra Atakan's video
1- We know nothing about the languages of the Anav and Kelteminar cultures.
2- The Mannaeans were probably Hurro-Urartian, maybe with some Kassite influence, nevertheless, nothing Turkic about them.
3- Despite it's proximity to the Proto-Turkic homeland, the Afanasievo culture was actually an Indo-European culture, proven by genetic connections between them and the Yamnaya, and it is likely that the Afanasievo brought the Proto-Tocharian language.
4- The consensus about the Andronovo culture is that they were Indo-Iranic, proven by ties with the Yamnaya and Corded Ware cultures.
5- The modern consensus is that the Scythians were in fact, Iranic, proven by Scythian names (of people, gods, places, etc.), medieval texts from Hotan and Tumxuk also prove that the Scythians were Iranic, similarities between the Scythians and the Turks could be explained by similar environments, contact and the fact that most Scythians were eventually assimilated by Turkic-speaking peoples.
6- The only accepted theory about the origin of the Etruscan is the Tyrsenian language family, which connects Etruscan with Rhaetian, Lemnian and possibly also Camunic.
7- The Wusun are generally regarded as an Indo-European people, most scholars seem to support the idea that the Wusun were Iranic, though others have also claimed that they were Tocharian or Indic.
8- Like the Scythians, the Sarmatians and their Iazyges tribe were Iranic, in fact, the modern Ossetian language is a descendant of the Sarmatian language, as the Alans were originally a tribe of the Sarmatians.
9- The Xianbei (except the Tuoba) were Khitano-Mongolic.
10- The Wuhuan were also Khitano-Mongolic, since they, like the Xianbei, descended from the Donghu.
11- The various city-states of the Tarim Basin were of Indo-European origin, the western ones spoke Scytho-Khotanese (Iranic) and the eastern ones spoke Tocharian (independent branch of IE).
12- The Shiwei were Khitano-Mongolic since they descended from the Xianbei and the Mongols derive from a Shiwei tribe.
13- The Tatabi were closely related to the Khitans, thus they were also Khitano-Mongolic.
14- Despite possible connections with the Turkic Pannonian Avars, the Rouran likely spoke a Khitano-Mongolic language, since they descended from the Donghu.
15- The Northern Yenissei and Assan Yenissei (I'm *not* referring to the Yenisei Kyrgyz btw) spoke Yeniseian languages, which are completely different from Turkic ones, also, the Northern Yenissei still exist as the Ket and Yugh (though the Ket language is moribund and the Yugh language is extinct).
16- The Arins and Pumpokols were also Yeniseian.
Other than that, I would say some borders are a bit exaggerated, the First Bulgarian Empire and the Arpad dynasty could have been showed longer, the Alchon Huns were probably independent from the Hephthalites, the Zhongshan and state could have been included.
What’s your background? You now Turkic history very well 🙃
@@AltaicGigachad I'm Portuguese
And yeah I'm really interested in history and linguistics, especially around Eurasia.
@@Nastya_07 that’s cool :) you should study European huns and there successors; Bolgars, Avars, Arpads etc..
@@AltaicGigachad Yeah I already do that
@@Nastya_07 btw the theory about the tuoba origin of Tang is actually not a theory but a historical fact. The tomb of Li Xian which was discovered in late 1980s or 1990s chanced everything
For example
Chen, Sanping (1996). "Succession Struggle and the Ethnic Identity of the Tang Imperial House". Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society. 6 (3): 381. ISSN 1356-1863. The official histories compiled during the Tang had been subjected to much political doctoring in order to mask and conceal the imperial house's "barbarian" background. The newest proof is the recent archaeological discovery showing that another contemporary prominent Li clan, namely that of Li Xian, the Northern Zhou Grand General with the same Longxi ancestry claim, was in fact of unmistakable Tuoba Xianbei descent.
History Turkishs very good ❤👍🤘🤘🤘🤘🤘🤘🤘🙏😎
As a Tatar I can confirm that Turks are real
Barcha Turkiylarga Assalamu Alekum
Merhaba kardeşim çok başarılı olmuş. Dc ismini verir misin? Bir kaç şey sormam gerekiyor.
Weren't scythians and sarmats indo-iranian?
They were,the video is just 60% turanist wank-off,claiming mongol,chinese or other cultures as Turkic,and the captions are basically propaganda 1-1