No international exposure. Doesn't that go against your core tenet of home country bias and also given that Internat has outpaced US in specific periods of time.
I modified this portfolio for a sinking fund used for intermediate term goals. I substituted short term treasuries for half of the bonds and added TIPs exposure. Thanks for the idea!
The Desert portfolio is quite a sensible portfolio for someone who either pre-retirement (40’s, 50’s) or risk averse. I’d prefer a little less gold exposure but one could add a slice of TIPS or utilities and be just fine.
Hey! I saw my comment up there! Haha. I'm just not sure about all those bonds tbh. This recent crash shows to me that bonds aren't that reliable either. If I put money into bonds in January 2021, I will still be at a loss over 3 years later.
Thanks for commenting again, Josh! What recent crash? ;) 2022 was more of a slow bleed. Look at any major sudden crash in history like '08 to see treasuries' "crisis alpha." Depends on what bonds you bought. That's why we say match duration to the investing horizon. But remember this is also supposed to be a long-term portfolio.
It's a good point about knowing your risk tolerance. People always worry about how to maximize returns, but rarely think about how they will behave in a big/long drawdown. I go with the Boglehead's Three Fund Portfolio with a small cap value tilt.
Thanks for posting this vid with the rationale. I have been thinking about VT 50%, GLD 5% and Income Bond ST, MT 20% and Income Lower Risk ETFs 25% for sometime now. I am really struggling with a higher return lower risk ETF funds. Right now I have a mixture of CEF, BDC, MLP, REIT, PFF, DIV, etc., It's been hard to find an etf that has lower risk ~.5 beta and 6% annual returns.
@@OptimizedPortfolio Likewise! I’ve started reading the Gyroscopic forum discussions you mention in this video and it will be a lot of fun to go over in-depth over the next few days. Out of curiosity, what’s your sentiment on this portfolio’s high allocation to ITT/bonds?
"You're probably thinking of popular names like the Ginger Ale portfolio." I have been investing since 2003, and I've never heard of the "Ginger Ale" portfolio before.
I can't wait for margin to become more efficient and comprehensible for retail investors over time I feel like that's really the main thing holding people back, is that many of us have higher risk tolerances which would be better served by just adding margin to a portfolio like this The hassle, perceived complexity and risk prevent us
Good point. Would probably agree. I think with newer platforms like M1 and newer products emerging like NTSX, RSSB, etc., it has definitely become more accessible in recent years.
To be completely honest, I never really understood the purpose of gold in a portfolio. But this portfolio has gotten me interested, so I'll look for more details about it.
Basically, A) gold tends to be uncorrelated to both stocks and bonds, offering a potential diversification benefit, and further, if stocks and bonds are both down, gold is usually up, and B) some use it as a purported "inflation hedge." Its reliability as such is debatable: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2078535
Very nice analysis and rational. Have you considered a market portfolio that included 56% Bonds, 43% stocks and 1% of commodities? based on statistical analysis of the past this one has the highest Sortino based on R.Doeswijk and T.Lam calculations (idea first revealed by J.Tobin and W.Sharp. More precise allocation looks as follow: 20 (USA Large cap), 15 (develop market equity ex US), 4 (emerging market equity) 17 US treasury bonds, 20 US enterprise bonds, 1 commodities, 4 real estate, 17 develop market treasury bond ex US, US bonds linked to the infliation.
GA portfolio is still my preferred core. Interesting to see how the small-cap value components contribute under different market conditions. Still, good to learn about risk parity. Thanks.
@@OptimizedPortfolio Been meaning to ask, would you still go with DGS over AVES in the GA portfolio? According to the Morningstar fund analyzer, AVES looks to be heavier in mid-caps compared to DGS; so, I've stuck to the original ETF line-up.
Interesting. Could you compare to the 2 Larry Portfolios that are "kind of" in same style of what you are doing here? (the 70 bonds -30 SCV) and the other (70 bonds and 30 w/3 stock funds).
Nice video. The main problem with bonds is that it’s impossible to know where they are heading. The data on which we all rely comes from a period during which we had a secular decline in interest rates. Right now no one knows which way the secular trend will go because so much depends on geopolitics. Most likely rates are heading higher as we have deglobalisation combined with unfavourable demographics. On the other than AI points the other way. Long term that means we can’t really measure risk.
Nah, decline in interest rates wasn't as much of a tail wind as people make it out to be: blog.thinknewfound.com/2017/04/declining-rates-actually-matter/ Starting rates are the best predictor for a bond's total return over its duration. For a bond FUND, that's [2n-1] years. The investor whose bond duration matches their investing horizon should be indifferent to interest rate changes, as doing so eliminates interest rate risk. Though of course in this specific instance with an intermediate fund that's harder to do.
@@OptimizedPortfolio thanks for replying and esp for taking the time to link to the article; it's much appreciated. As to you other point, you are 100% right of course that if bonds are held to maturity there is no interest rate risk. However, there is inflation and opportunity cost risk. If interest rates rise long term from here because inflation is higher than expected then bonds will turn out to have been a bad investment (at least in relative terms). My point was that unlike equities - which generally drift upwards - we don't know which way rates will go because of geopolitics. That makes them riskier than in the past when the secular trend was downwards.
@@stephengerrard6412 Interest rate changes and even directions are hard to predict. One study from Jim Bianco found that among top economists, their direction predictions twice a year from 1982 through 2006 were right less than 1/3 of the time. Bond markets also aren't as cut and dry as rates up = bonds down. For 1992-2000, interest rates rose by about 3% and long treasury bonds returned about 9% annualized for the period. Short bonds returned 6% annualized. For 2003-2007, interest rates rose by about 4% and long treasury bonds returned about 5% annualized for the period. Short bonds returned 3% annualized. For 2015-2019, interest rates rose by about 2% and long treasury bonds returned about 5% annualized for the period. Short bonds returned 1% annualized. Mark Hulbert once said: "If you think successfully timing the stock market is difficult - and it is - timing the bond market is virtually impossible."
Thanks for the detailed reply. The key takeaway is that predicting bond return is very very hard. As such over the long term this type of portfolio may be riskier - relative to inflation - than for example your Ginger Ale. Fair summary?
Both, I suppose, though objectively speaking, more the former. Gold technically has no implicit value so we'd expect it to have a real return (return adjusted for inflation) of around zero. It has been a bit more than that historically at about 7% nominal, 4% real IIRC.
Problem is, long-term bonds crashed HARD 3 years ago and while they have a higher yield now, that's not much of a consolation when they are down like 40-50% (like TLT etf) and are waiting for those rate cuts and/or major stock market crash. While in the mean time stocks are on all time highs.
@@AK-47ISTHEWAY how much will they skyrocket? The TLT etf needs to DOUBLE, 2x, just to get back where it WERE before the crash. Not talking about a new all time high. In 2020 during Covid it rallied briefly for 40%. In 2008-2009 - about the same. And this is excluding the credit risk - shor-term or long-term of specifically US bonds. May be irrelevant today, but most agree - the path with debt right now is unsustainable. And there is little sign of it correcting.
1. This portfolio doesn't use long bonds. 2. Current yield is the best predictor of a bond's return over its duration. 3. By definition, a long bond that has dropped in price must now make up for that with greater yield over its lifetime of 20+ years. As the name suggest, long bonds are for long horizons. One shouldn't be concerned with their behavior over only 3 years. Don't play short-term games with long-term investments.
@@OptimizedPortfolio " This portfolio doesn't use long bonds." - My bad, I missed the "interim bonds" because of the comparison to the all weather portfolio, which is overweight in long term bonds. HOWEVER - interim bonds suffer from the exact same problem as long term bonds but on a smaller scale due to duration - take BIV etf, its down 25% from its peak in 2020, you need a 50% upside to come back to that, historically in 2008-2011 it rose at best about 20%. As for your 2. and 3. - if we are talking about 20+ year investment horizon how is the expected return here comparable to stocks? By all metrics, average historical return on stocks havs been higher than any type of bonds. There is no rational point for a buy and hold investor for 20+ years to thus hold any bonds. This is a portfolio for a potential panic seller/beginner, who is afraid of volatility. As for the "only 3 years" - I stated there Great Financial crisis crash as an example here, both TLT and BIV performed poorly compared to the SP500 otherwise. There is a looming threat over bonds in the long-run which is not being addressed properly right now on top of all that. Not to mention long-term sticky inflation fears, which destroy bond etf value. There is just so much against bonds right now and even worse for the future...to recommend a 60% allocation.
@@OptimizedPortfolio YT not letting me post a link… google it - The Fund: Ray Dalio, Bridgewater Associates, and the Unraveling of a Wall Street Legend
Insert "You probably never heard of it." hipster dog meme here. Honestly, this is interesting, I might have to look at it further. but 30% equities sounds like a tiny allocation. How did this weather recent inflation?
Ginger Ale Portfolio is here: www.optimizedportfolio.com/ginger-ale-portfolio/ I don't have a video on it yet. If you think 60% bonds is "unthinkable," you might be in for a rough retirement via sequence risk. Thanks for watching.
@@OptimizedPortfolio haha.ok it is “thinkable” but there’s such a downturn on bonds recently. You would have kicked yourself during this rally. ….ok ok it is meant to be never adjusted, I get it. Again I thank you.
@@genorgeanaplaszio1246 Recency bias, outcome bias, and tracking error regret should not inform portfolio construction. Maybe you missed my video a couple weeks ago ;) th-cam.com/video/xgWYvVhiL4E/w-d-xo.html
We don't know that with certainty. That's sort of the entire point of this portfolio - to avoid making guesses about an unknowable future. Plenty of extended periods where bonds - and more importantly, a diversified portfolio of stocks AND bonds - beat stocks. This portfolio doesn't use long bonds, but long bonds just beat stocks for the 2-decade period 2000-2019. We can only know the optimal portfolio in hindsight. That's why, again, this one stays pretty agnostic toward 3 different uncorrelated assets.
This would be a terrible portfolio for a long term buy and hold investor. Considering the behavioral risk of drawdowns but not considering the behavioral risk associated with watching every other "lazy investor" portfolio out gain you (which creates serious FOMO) is a disastrous oversight. Yes, most younger folks (started investing last decade or so) investors have yet to live through a real, prolonged bear market, but assuming that freaking out when one happens and thus making bad timing decisions but not considering the tracking error (to an SP or Total market portfolio)? Probably my hardest, vehement disagree with you so far, but still - great website and channel!
You sort of make my point for me. "Terrible" is subjective. As noted, there would be extended periods where this portfolio beats 100% stocks. I'm a fan of simplicity to prevent tinkering. Tracking error regret is real, certainly, but so is risk tolerance, and most severely overestimate it. Not an oversight at all. I would submit the latter is potentially far more detrimental. An investor may panic sell during a crash, fear re-entry, and then be afraid of stocks entirely thereafter. I maintain that most are better suited with a well-diversified, multi-asset portfolio. Does that mean it has to be this one? Of course not. But I'm actually surprised that this portfolio - and Dalio's All Weather - has performed as well as it has historically relative to 100% stocks.
I didn’t hear him mention an age range. Yes, young people would probably be best served with a more aggressive mix but it’s a solid portfolio for someone in their 40’s, 50’s, 60’s.
@@OptimizedPortfolio You would have gotten me to be less skeptical if you said this was more of a wealth preservation portfolio. Something to use IN retirement... :-) Besides, last I looked, Ray Dalio's biggest position was Emerging Markets... So I don't think he uses "his own" all weather portfolio.
@@Omar-et7sb I suppose one can use it how/when they want. But you perhaps continue to forget that young investors can still have a low emotional tolerance for risk, in which case this may be a perfectly suitable portfolio. Dalio's proposed All Weather Portfolio from the Tony Robbins interview is not meant to perfectly match Bridgewater's All Weather Fund. Bridgewater also offer other hedge funds.
@@OptimizedPortfolio How would you measure that risk vs the risk of a portfolio not compounding/growing enough to replace income in the future? Even heavy-bond users like Larry Swedroe do it with a counter-weighted risky position with high expected returns (in his case, SCV).
![[TH] 2024 PMSL SEA Finals D1 | Fall | ยิงต้องโหด ให้เหมือนโกรธกันมาก่อน](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/OnTdfGySmds/mqdefault.jpg)
Do you have a favorite lazy portfolio?
What do you think of the Desert Portfolio? Invest in it here: optimizedportfolio.com/go/desert-global
No international exposure. Doesn't that go against your core tenet of home country bias and also given that Internat has outpaced US in specific periods of time.
@@couldbe8348 I would use global stocks for the stocks piece, which is the one I linked.
@@OptimizedPortfolio Ah got it
I modified this portfolio for a sinking fund used for intermediate term goals. I substituted short term treasuries for half of the bonds and added TIPs exposure. Thanks for the idea!
Thanks for sharing!
The Desert portfolio is quite a sensible portfolio for someone who either pre-retirement (40’s, 50’s) or risk averse. I’d prefer a little less gold exposure but one could add a slice of TIPS or utilities and be just fine.
Well said. Thanks for watching and commenting!
Hey! I saw my comment up there! Haha. I'm just not sure about all those bonds tbh. This recent crash shows to me that bonds aren't that reliable either. If I put money into bonds in January 2021, I will still be at a loss over 3 years later.
Thanks for commenting again, Josh!
What recent crash? ;) 2022 was more of a slow bleed. Look at any major sudden crash in history like '08 to see treasuries' "crisis alpha."
Depends on what bonds you bought. That's why we say match duration to the investing horizon.
But remember this is also supposed to be a long-term portfolio.
It's a good point about knowing your risk tolerance. People always worry about how to maximize returns, but rarely think about how they will behave in a big/long drawdown. I go with the Boglehead's Three Fund Portfolio with a small cap value tilt.
Indeed. Investing for retirement is about aiming for a high probability of a good outcome, not a low probability of a great outcome.
Thanks for posting this vid with the rationale. I have been thinking about VT 50%, GLD 5% and Income Bond ST, MT 20% and Income Lower Risk ETFs 25% for sometime now. I am really struggling with a higher return lower risk ETF funds. Right now I have a mixture of CEF, BDC, MLP, REIT, PFF, DIV, etc., It's been hard to find an etf that has lower risk ~.5 beta and 6% annual returns.
Thanks for watching!
It’s a good feeling watching a video discussing the “best portfolio” and it’s your DIY portfolio exactly 😂
Doubles every 48 years?
Love it, Aidan! Thanks for sharing.
@@grigorirasputin425 If it was any quicker, I’d be displeased
@@AidanJeavons 😂😂😂👍🏻
@@OptimizedPortfolio Likewise! I’ve started reading the Gyroscopic forum discussions you mention in this video and it will be a lot of fun to go over in-depth over the next few days. Out of curiosity, what’s your sentiment on this portfolio’s high allocation to ITT/bonds?
As a retiree, I like this.
Thanks for watching!
Sadly, my 401k account do not have option to invest Gold. Thanks for your information
T.I.P.S. (Treasury Inflation Protected Securities) are a good alternative to gold. See if you have a T.I.P.S fund in your 401k.
Makes sense. I don't think mine does either. You could maybe put the gold in an IRA.
@@OptimizedPortfolio Yes, I have #IAUM in IRA due to the lowest fee.
May be a blessing in disguise since gold is a terrible investment for your accumulation phase (and I'd argue, like Warren Buffet, for any phase).
@@Omar-et7sb I do agree gold makes little logical sense for a young accumulator with a long horizon.
"You're probably thinking of popular names like the Ginger Ale portfolio." I have been investing since 2003, and I've never heard of the "Ginger Ale" portfolio before.
I think that’s a joke. It’s what he calls his personal portfolio because there happened to be a can of ginger ale on his desk or something like that.
I just wrote it up several years ago: www.optimizedportfolio.com/ginger-ale-portfolio/
I can't wait for margin to become more efficient and comprehensible for retail investors over time
I feel like that's really the main thing holding people back, is that many of us have higher risk tolerances which would be better served by just adding margin to a portfolio like this
The hassle, perceived complexity and risk prevent us
Good point. Would probably agree. I think with newer platforms like M1 and newer products emerging like NTSX, RSSB, etc., it has definitely become more accessible in recent years.
I'd rather see my portfolio go down than invest in gold. At least stocks tend to go up in the long run, unlike gold which underperforms for decades 😅
Fair enough. I'm not a big fan of gold either, but it has delivered about 8% annualized over the past half century.
To be completely honest, I never really understood the purpose of gold in a portfolio. But this portfolio has gotten me interested, so I'll look for more details about it.
Basically, A) gold tends to be uncorrelated to both stocks and bonds, offering a potential diversification benefit, and further, if stocks and bonds are both down, gold is usually up, and B) some use it as a purported "inflation hedge." Its reliability as such is debatable: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2078535
Very nice analysis and rational. Have you considered a market portfolio that included 56% Bonds, 43% stocks and 1% of commodities? based on statistical analysis of the past this one has the highest Sortino based on R.Doeswijk and T.Lam calculations (idea first revealed by J.Tobin and W.Sharp. More precise allocation looks as follow:
20 (USA Large cap), 15 (develop market equity ex US), 4 (emerging market equity)
17 US treasury bonds, 20 US enterprise bonds, 1 commodities, 4 real estate,
17 develop market treasury bond ex US, US bonds linked to the infliation.
Thanks.
Sounds like overfitting. I certainly wouldn't get that specific with MVO to inform future allocations. 1% anything is doing basically nothing.
GA portfolio is still my preferred core. Interesting to see how the small-cap value components contribute under different market conditions. Still, good to learn about risk parity. Thanks.
Thanks, Greg! Indeed, we'll see what the future holds.
@@OptimizedPortfolio Been meaning to ask, would you still go with DGS over AVES in the GA portfolio? According to the Morningstar fund analyzer, AVES looks to be heavier in mid-caps compared to DGS; so, I've stuck to the original ETF line-up.
@@GregK235 Yes. If I change my opinion on it, I'll post about it and update my "best in class ETFs" list.
@@GregK235 I also discussed this here if you haven't seen it: www.optimizedportfolio.com/aves/
Interesting. Could you compare to the 2 Larry Portfolios that are "kind of" in same style of what you are doing here? (the 70 bonds -30 SCV) and the other (70 bonds and 30 w/3 stock funds).
Thanks for the suggestion.
Nice video. The main problem with bonds is that it’s impossible to know where they are heading. The data on which we all rely comes from a period during which we had a secular decline in interest rates. Right now no one knows which way the secular trend will go because so much depends on geopolitics. Most likely rates are heading higher as we have deglobalisation combined with unfavourable demographics. On the other than AI points the other way. Long term that means we can’t really measure risk.
Nah, decline in interest rates wasn't as much of a tail wind as people make it out to be: blog.thinknewfound.com/2017/04/declining-rates-actually-matter/
Starting rates are the best predictor for a bond's total return over its duration. For a bond FUND, that's [2n-1] years.
The investor whose bond duration matches their investing horizon should be indifferent to interest rate changes, as doing so eliminates interest rate risk. Though of course in this specific instance with an intermediate fund that's harder to do.
@@OptimizedPortfolio thanks for replying and esp for taking the time to link to the article; it's much appreciated. As to you other point, you are 100% right of course that if bonds are held to maturity there is no interest rate risk. However, there is inflation and opportunity cost risk. If interest rates rise long term from here because inflation is higher than expected then bonds will turn out to have been a bad investment (at least in relative terms). My point was that unlike equities - which generally drift upwards - we don't know which way rates will go because of geopolitics. That makes them riskier than in the past when the secular trend was downwards.
@@stephengerrard6412 Interest rate changes and even directions are hard to predict. One study from Jim Bianco found that among top economists, their direction predictions twice a year from 1982 through 2006 were right less than 1/3 of the time.
Bond markets also aren't as cut and dry as rates up = bonds down.
For 1992-2000, interest rates rose by about 3% and long treasury bonds returned about 9% annualized for the period. Short bonds returned 6% annualized.
For 2003-2007, interest rates rose by about 4% and long treasury bonds returned about 5% annualized for the period. Short bonds returned 3% annualized.
For 2015-2019, interest rates rose by about 2% and long treasury bonds returned about 5% annualized for the period. Short bonds returned 1% annualized.
Mark Hulbert once said: "If you think successfully timing the stock market is difficult - and it is - timing the bond market is virtually impossible."
Thanks for the detailed reply. The key takeaway is that predicting bond return is very very hard. As such over the long term this type of portfolio may be riskier - relative to inflation - than for example your Ginger Ale. Fair summary?
@@stephengerrard6412 Riskier relative to inflation, possibly. As you can see, depends on one's definition of "risk."
Is gold in the portfolio for the diversification benefit or does it actually have a real return?
Both, I suppose, though objectively speaking, more the former. Gold technically has no implicit value so we'd expect it to have a real return (return adjusted for inflation) of around zero. It has been a bit more than that historically at about 7% nominal, 4% real IIRC.
There's a reason China are buying up all the Gold...
Great video!!!👍 How would you do a 80/20 on a 3 fund portfolio??
Do you mean the Bogleheads 3 Fund Portfolio? I explained that in that video: th-cam.com/video/w36sJdbsBhA/w-d-xo.html
Problem is, long-term bonds crashed HARD 3 years ago and while they have a higher yield now, that's not much of a consolation when they are down like 40-50% (like TLT etf) and are waiting for those rate cuts and/or major stock market crash. While in the mean time stocks are on all time highs.
Don't worry, there's going to be a correction soon, and stocks are going to crash hard, and treasury bonds will skyrocket.
@@AK-47ISTHEWAY how much will they skyrocket? The TLT etf needs to DOUBLE, 2x, just to get back where it WERE before the crash. Not talking about a new all time high. In 2020 during Covid it rallied briefly for 40%. In 2008-2009 - about the same. And this is excluding the credit risk - shor-term or long-term of specifically US bonds. May be irrelevant today, but most agree - the path with debt right now is unsustainable. And there is little sign of it correcting.
1. This portfolio doesn't use long bonds.
2. Current yield is the best predictor of a bond's return over its duration.
3. By definition, a long bond that has dropped in price must now make up for that with greater yield over its lifetime of 20+ years. As the name suggest, long bonds are for long horizons. One shouldn't be concerned with their behavior over only 3 years. Don't play short-term games with long-term investments.
@@OptimizedPortfolio " This portfolio doesn't use long bonds." - My bad, I missed the "interim bonds" because of the comparison to the all weather portfolio, which is overweight in long term bonds. HOWEVER - interim bonds suffer from the exact same problem as long term bonds but on a smaller scale due to duration - take BIV etf, its down 25% from its peak in 2020, you need a 50% upside to come back to that, historically in 2008-2011 it rose at best about 20%. As for your 2. and 3. - if we are talking about 20+ year investment horizon how is the expected return here comparable to stocks? By all metrics, average historical return on stocks havs been higher than any type of bonds. There is no rational point for a buy and hold investor for 20+ years to thus hold any bonds. This is a portfolio for a potential panic seller/beginner, who is afraid of volatility.
As for the "only 3 years" - I stated there Great Financial crisis crash as an example here, both TLT and BIV performed poorly compared to the SP500 otherwise. There is a looming threat over bonds in the long-run which is not being addressed properly right now on top of all that. Not to mention long-term sticky inflation fears, which destroy bond etf value. There is just so much against bonds right now and even worse for the future...to recommend a 60% allocation.
Have you read 'The Fund'? It paints Dalio in a very different light... Even if you don't believe everything in it, it's still a great read.
I haven't. Can you link me?
@@OptimizedPortfolio YT not letting me post a link… google it - The Fund: Ray Dalio, Bridgewater Associates, and the Unraveling of a Wall Street Legend
Hi, I am very interested in that portfolio.
How did you manage to backtest so far, before the IAUM fund that's listed in your M1 link?
Using older mutual funds for the same asset classes.
@@OptimizedPortfolio thank you.
@@Michael-DS Anytime! :)
Insert "You probably never heard of it." hipster dog meme here.
Honestly, this is interesting, I might have to look at it further. but 30% equities sounds like a tiny allocation.
How did this weather recent inflation?
Not great, not terrible. I'll leave you to backtest for yourself if you want. Thanks for watching.
My favorite lazy portfolio is 70% VOO and 30% AVUV
Thanks for sharing.
Nice. Mine is 50% NTSX and 50% AVGV. But I will consider RSSB to replace NTSX... going to give it a few years.
@@Omar-et7sb Niccce. 😎
70% VFV 30% VCE here
Where is your ginger ale portfolio? Btw thank you for the desert portfolio presentation but I would never go 60% bonds, unthinkable, respectfully.
Ginger Ale Portfolio is here: www.optimizedportfolio.com/ginger-ale-portfolio/
I don't have a video on it yet.
If you think 60% bonds is "unthinkable," you might be in for a rough retirement via sequence risk.
Thanks for watching.
@@OptimizedPortfolio haha.ok it is “thinkable” but there’s such a downturn on bonds recently. You would have kicked yourself during this rally. ….ok ok it is meant to be never adjusted, I get it. Again I thank you.
@@genorgeanaplaszio1246 Recency bias, outcome bias, and tracking error regret should not inform portfolio construction.
Maybe you missed my video a couple weeks ago ;) th-cam.com/video/xgWYvVhiL4E/w-d-xo.html
@@OptimizedPortfolio no I didn’t miss it. I understand recency bias (problem is, I guess I am a slave to it).
@@genorgeanaplaszio1246 Fight against it, brother! 💪
60% bonds is death to great returns over the long term.
We don't know that with certainty. That's sort of the entire point of this portfolio - to avoid making guesses about an unknowable future.
Plenty of extended periods where bonds - and more importantly, a diversified portfolio of stocks AND bonds - beat stocks.
This portfolio doesn't use long bonds, but long bonds just beat stocks for the 2-decade period 2000-2019.
We can only know the optimal portfolio in hindsight. That's why, again, this one stays pretty agnostic toward 3 different uncorrelated assets.
This would be a terrible portfolio for a long term buy and hold investor. Considering the behavioral risk of drawdowns but not considering the behavioral risk associated with watching every other "lazy investor" portfolio out gain you (which creates serious FOMO) is a disastrous oversight.
Yes, most younger folks (started investing last decade or so) investors have yet to live through a real, prolonged bear market, but assuming that freaking out when one happens and thus making bad timing decisions but not considering the tracking error (to an SP or Total market portfolio)?
Probably my hardest, vehement disagree with you so far, but still - great website and channel!
You sort of make my point for me. "Terrible" is subjective. As noted, there would be extended periods where this portfolio beats 100% stocks. I'm a fan of simplicity to prevent tinkering.
Tracking error regret is real, certainly, but so is risk tolerance, and most severely overestimate it. Not an oversight at all. I would submit the latter is potentially far more detrimental. An investor may panic sell during a crash, fear re-entry, and then be afraid of stocks entirely thereafter.
I maintain that most are better suited with a well-diversified, multi-asset portfolio. Does that mean it has to be this one? Of course not. But I'm actually surprised that this portfolio - and Dalio's All Weather - has performed as well as it has historically relative to 100% stocks.
I didn’t hear him mention an age range. Yes, young people would probably be best served with a more aggressive mix but it’s a solid portfolio for someone in their 40’s, 50’s, 60’s.
@@OptimizedPortfolio You would have gotten me to be less skeptical if you said this was more of a wealth preservation portfolio. Something to use IN retirement... :-)
Besides, last I looked, Ray Dalio's biggest position was Emerging Markets... So I don't think he uses "his own" all weather portfolio.
@@Omar-et7sb I suppose one can use it how/when they want. But you perhaps continue to forget that young investors can still have a low emotional tolerance for risk, in which case this may be a perfectly suitable portfolio.
Dalio's proposed All Weather Portfolio from the Tony Robbins interview is not meant to perfectly match Bridgewater's All Weather Fund. Bridgewater also offer other hedge funds.
@@OptimizedPortfolio How would you measure that risk vs the risk of a portfolio not compounding/growing enough to replace income in the future? Even heavy-bond users like Larry Swedroe do it with a counter-weighted risky position with high expected returns (in his case, SCV).
…. Steepling too much
What?