Nice work. But arent me suppose to use +ve lens in case of eso deviation, as to compensate eso we need to bring in divergence. If we add -ve lens, the eso will increase... End up having a pseudo high ac/a
In the gradient method at first we find 8 △esophoria at distance, and when adding -2.00D phoria will increase, but in this video phoria shown 2△ esophoria when -2.00D added. How kindly solve my doubt?
I agree. Typically the patient would become more eso if adding a minus lens in front, correct? What could cause this abnormality in a real-life scenario?
Nice video 👍
This is the best video ! Bestest of the best !
I like this kind of practical demonstrations. Bcz it made me to easy understanding❤
nice video 👌👌
Thank you so much 🙏
Really helpful video
Good 👍
Nice work. But arent me suppose to use +ve lens in case of eso deviation, as to compensate eso we need to bring in divergence. If we add -ve lens, the eso will increase... End up having a pseudo high ac/a
Nice video
As usual, great work 👍
cylindrical power : 1.25
IOL readings were :
k1 axis : 5
K2 acis : 95
---------
Automated refraction axis : 5
which axis should we consider for disposing prescription axis k2 - 95 (or) K1 - 5 ?
Good
Thank you 🙏
verry nice video thank u so mutch and good luck
Nicely explained
In the gradient method at first we find 8 △esophoria at distance, and when adding -2.00D phoria will increase, but in this video phoria shown 2△ esophoria when -2.00D added. How kindly solve my doubt?
It is just an example.
I have the same doubt
I agree. Typically the patient would become more eso if adding a minus lens in front, correct? What could cause this abnormality in a real-life scenario?
How to measure prism diopter
Why 6 mètres
Sir please reply