Does this reporter do no investigating? No due diligence? She goes to a small QC company, and doesn't even report on other ways to achieve a QC only the superconducting mode which requires the cryogenics. IONQ doesn't require them! The use lasers to cool the qubits in the trap.
Commercial viability in very small consumer space, with a substantial equipment and operation cost. Would anyone operating or using quantum computing break even?
15-30 years is what Jensen said not 30 years. Literally its like CNBC thinks anyone who watches this will not do their research.
Does this reporter do no investigating? No due diligence? She goes to a small QC company, and doesn't even report on other ways to achieve a QC only the superconducting mode which requires the cryogenics. IONQ doesn't require them! The use lasers to cool the qubits in the trap.
Agreed, she did not do enough due diligence. I hold ionq stock and they are most likely to do it before all others.
2021 vibes
Do more DD, don't go off of what they are reporting. There are at least 6 different ways to get a qubit.
Commercial viability in very small consumer space, with a substantial equipment and operation cost. Would anyone operating or using quantum computing break even?
You haven't done enough DD. Learn about the companies not requiring it (IONQ).
Moore's Law is real. Coming faster than most believe
Rigetti more like Rigretti
$CBDC $Vechain
QUANTUM COMPUTERS IS BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING 👀 YOU
SURVEILLANCE AND CONTROL