The Hype Over Quantum Computers, Explained

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 2.5K

  • @tuanx
    @tuanx 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4158

    Soooo, you're saying I'll be able to run TWO tabs in Chrome?

    • @LuisPereztpa
      @LuisPereztpa 5 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      hahahahhaha fire

    • @Brucelee89896
      @Brucelee89896 5 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      my pc can run 100 tabs at once

    • @sanders5128
      @sanders5128 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      No Googol tabs

    • @sanders5128
      @sanders5128 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @Lucas Zhu Pi is 3,14 etc Googol is the number !

    • @carknower
      @carknower 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Alexander Sprokkereef you do not know the significance of Pi. I wonder how many Googol’s it will take you to run the calculations on that.

  • @BaconSniffer578
    @BaconSniffer578 5 ปีที่แล้ว +993

    It’s amazing how quantum computers look like the first ever computers. They look massive and mechanical. Imagine this technology in 100 years

    • @zoltanmeszaros4684
      @zoltanmeszaros4684 5 ปีที่แล้ว +40

      @ArjenRobben Mr.Wembley wanna bet

    • @whoisray1680
      @whoisray1680 4 ปีที่แล้ว +118

      Technology growth is an exponential graph. We no longer need 100 years. We only need 10-15 more years!! Especially with the discovery of nuclear electric resonance and new superconducting material

    • @Hunter-gk4zm
      @Hunter-gk4zm 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Its going to be small and esy to carry

    • @NLamki2002
      @NLamki2002 4 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      @@whoisray1680 lack of competition could cause delays in this process, vice versa.

    • @darklex5150
      @darklex5150 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@whoisray1680 i wanna think thats true, in the 50's the technology was a lot more limited than today so thats why it took us 50 years to develop proper computers and 60 years for smartphones.

  • @xhuang101
    @xhuang101 5 ปีที่แล้ว +506

    Can it calculate why I can't get a text back?

    • @ivankiefer3886
      @ivankiefer3886 5 ปีที่แล้ว +207

      You dont need a quantum computer for the answer just look at the mirror.

    • @twinkmaster2
      @twinkmaster2 5 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Big oof

    • @Nikkk6969
      @Nikkk6969 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      F

    • @wifilost
      @wifilost 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      If that's how you look then please dont look for the answer

    • @thomasmcginnis7526
      @thomasmcginnis7526 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      You don't need quantom computer for that. Even simple average person can comprehend why you can't get text back. You ain't got no game. There I answered your question

  • @dresdenkiller
    @dresdenkiller 3 ปีที่แล้ว +472

    I think in 30 years, Quantum Computers will crack Victoria's Secret.

    • @josetriana6591
      @josetriana6591 3 ปีที่แล้ว +51

      The secret is Victoria is a man

    • @willbradford4575
      @willbradford4575 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I think in 30 years, Quantum Computers will crack Victoria's Secret.

    • @0animalproductworld558
      @0animalproductworld558 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Good comment 😂😋 Victoria's Secret assuming that you talk about the paint it's just who the painter is 😋 you're bascially trying to ubderstand what was in the painter's head and himself when hr was painting 😋

    • @zackdv7223
      @zackdv7223 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@willbradford4575 I think in 30 years, Quantum Computers will crack Victoria's Secret's Secret.

    • @dkoz8321
      @dkoz8321 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You don't need a computer to figure that one out. The secret of Victoria's Secret is vanity and narcissistic personality.

  • @osheenkelana
    @osheenkelana 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    MALAY SUBTITLES Part 2 of 4
    04:40
    Perubahan suhu berdekatan dan gelombang elektromagnetik
    04:43
    boleh menyebabkan mereka kacau.
    04:45
    Dan kemudian ada suhu kerepek kuantum
    04:47
    diri mereka. Mereka perlu disimpan pada suhu yang lebih sejuk
    04:50
    daripada ruang antara bintang, hampir dengan sifar mutlak.
    05:00
    Salah satu prinsip utama fizik kuantum disebut
    05:02
    superposisi. Itu bermaksud zarah subatom seperti
    05:06
    elektron boleh wujud dalam dua keadaan yang berbeza pada masa yang sama
    05:09
    masa. Itu dan masih sukar untuk komputer biasa
    05:13
    untuk mensimulasikan mekanik kuantum kerana superposisi.
    05:17
    Tidak, hanya pada awal tahun lapan puluhan beberapa orang
    05:19
    ahli fizik, seperti Richard Feynman mempunyai yang luar biasa
    05:23
    cadangan bahawa jika alam memberi kita pengiraan itu
    05:28
    lemon, baik, mengapa tidak membuatnya menjadi serai?
    05:30
    Anda mungkin pernah mendengar atau membaca penjelasan ini tentang bagaimana a
    05:33
    komputer kuantum berfungsi.
    05:35
    Komputer biasa atau klasik berjalan menggunakan bit.
    05:38
    Bit boleh menjadi 1 atau sifar.
    05:41
    Komputer kuantum, sebaliknya, menggunakan bit kuantum
    05:44
    atau hasta. Cubits boleh berupa 1 atau sifar atau kedua-duanya atau a
    05:48
    gabungan keduanya pada masa yang sama.
    05:51
    Itu tidak salah, tetapi hanya menggaru
    05:53
    permukaan. Menurut Scott Aaronson, yang mengajar komputer
    05:56
    sains dan pengkomputeran kuantum di University of Texas di
    05:59
    Austin. Kami memintanya untuk menjelaskan bagaimana pengkomputeran kuantum
    06:02
    sebenarnya berfungsi. Baiklah, saya mulakan dengan ini.
    06:05
    Anda tidak pernah mendengar peramal cuaca anda mengatakan bahawa kami tahu ada
    06:08
    kemungkinan negatif 30 peratus hujan esok.
    06:11
    Betul. Itu tidak masuk akal, bukan?
    06:13
    Adakah kemungkinan sesuatu berlaku, seperti biasa, antara 0
    06:16
    peratus dan 100 peratus.
    06:18
    Tetapi sekarang mekanik kuantum berdasarkan nombor yang disebut
    06:22
    amplitud. Amplitud boleh positif atau negatif.
    06:27
    Sebenarnya, mereka boleh menjadi nombor kompleks yang melibatkan
    06:30
    punca kuasa dua negatif.
    06:32
    Jadi qubit adalah sedikit yang mempunyai amplitud untuk menjadi sifar
    06:37
    dan amplitud lain untuk menjadi satu.
    06:40
    Matlamat untuk komputer kuantum adalah memastikan
    06:42
    amplitud yang membawa kepada jawapan yang salah saling membatalkan.
    06:46
    Dan para saintis membaca output kuantum
    06:48
    komputer dibiarkan dengan amplitud yang menuju ke kanan
    06:51
    jawapan apa sahaja masalah yang mereka cuba selesaikan.
    06:53
    Jadi bagaimana rupa bentuk komputer kuantum
    06:56
    dunia? Komputer kuantum yang dibangunkan oleh syarikat seperti
    06:59
    Google, IBM dan Rigetti semuanya dibuat menggunakan proses
    07:02
    dipanggil superkonduktor
    07:04
    Dan di sinilah anda mempunyai cip yang biasa
    07:08
    cip komputer dan anda mempunyai sedikit gegelung wayar di
    07:13
    anda tahu, yang sebenarnya cukup besar oleh
    07:16
    piawai hasta.
    07:17
    Anda tahu, hampir cukup besar untuk dilihat dengan
    07:19
    mata kasar. Tetapi anda boleh mempunyai dua keadaan kuantum yang berbeza
    07:24
    arus yang mengalir melalui gegelung ini bahawa
    07:27
    sepadan dengan sifar atau satu.
    07:30
    Dan tentu saja, anda juga boleh memiliki kedudukan super
    07:33
    dua. Kini gegelung dapat berinteraksi antara satu sama lain melalui
    07:37
    sesuatu yang disebut perintah Josef.
    07:39
    Jadi mereka dibentangkan dalam susunan segi empat tepat dan
    07:43
    yang berdekatan boleh bercakap antara satu sama lain dan dengan itu menjana
    07:48
    keadaan yang sangat rumit ini, yang kita panggil terjerat
    07:50
    menyatakan, yang merupakan salah satu perkara penting dalam pengkomputeran kuantum
    07:55
    dan cara kubis saling berinteraksi adalah
    07:58
    dapat diprogramkan sepenuhnya.
    07:59
    OKEY. Oleh itu, anda boleh menghantar isyarat elektrik ke cip tersebut
    08:04
    kubus mana yang harus berinteraksi antara satu sama lain di mana
    08:07
    masa. Sekarang pesanan untuk ini berfungsi, keseluruhan cipnya
    08:12
    diletakkan di dalam peti sejuk evolusi.
    08:14
    Itu ukuran almari secara kasar.
    08:17
    Panggilan itu berlaku sekitar seratus darjah di atas
    08:19
    sifar mutlak. Di situlah anda mendapat superkonduktiviti
    08:22
    yang membolehkan bit ini berkelakuan sebentar sebagai hasta.
    08:32
    Dan makmal penyelidikan IBM di Yorktown Heights, New York, the
    08:35
    syarikat teknologi besar, menempatkan beberapa komputer kuantum
    08:38
    terpaut ke awan. Pelanggan korporat seperti Goldman
    08:41
    Sachs dan JP Morgan adalah sebahagian daripada Q Network IBM, di mana mereka berada
    08:45
    boleh bereksperimen dengan mesin kuantum dan mesinnya
    08:47
    bahasa pengaturcaraan.
    08:49
    Sejauh ini, ini adalah cara bagi syarikat untuk membiasakan diri dengan kuantum
    08:51
    pengkomputeran dan bukannya menjana wang darinya.
    08:53
    Komputer kuantum memerlukan lebih banyak hasta sebelumnya
    08:56
    mereka mula melakukan perkara yang berguna.
    08:58
    IBM baru-baru ini melancarkan lima puluh tiga komputer padu yang sama
    09:01
    saiz sebagai pemproses sycamore Google.
    09:03
    Kami fikir kita sebenarnya memerlukan puluhan ribu,
    09:07
    ratusan ribu qubit untuk mendapatkan perniagaan sebenar
    09:10
    masalah. Oleh itu, anda dapat melihat banyak kemajuan dan
    09:13
    dua kali ganda setiap tahun atau mungkin sedikit lebih cepat adalah apa
    09:16
    kita perlu membawa kita ke sana. Itulah sebabnya 10 tahun keluar, di
    09:19
    paling tidak.

  • @DoubleOhSilver
    @DoubleOhSilver 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1489

    0:00 "Quantum computers use the natural world..." literally everything uses the natural world

    • @topfuel29channel
      @topfuel29channel 5 ปีที่แล้ว +70

      LoL Exactly!!! What is the 'unnatural world'.. LOL... Voodoo :)

    • @carknower
      @carknower 5 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      Mulinaster I appreciate your use of big words to try and sound intelligent but simplicity is the language of an intelligent mind.
      Here’s some ancient wisdom for you “He who knows it, does not speak. He who is ready to speak, does not know it.”

    • @thehorsesnamewasfriday8695
      @thehorsesnamewasfriday8695 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Lmao

    • @carknower
      @carknower 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Mulinaster oh grand master, please explain to me what a secondary product is.
      Is it the refinement of metal found in nature or the chemical process of it. Is it paper that is found in nature or is it intentionally created?
      And where to begin with the semiconductor? Must of just been the crumbs of nature.
      I guess manipulating elements based on the rules of nature and natural laws isn’t nature, but then what is nature if not the laws themselves.

    • @carknower
      @carknower 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Mulinaster if I’m beginning to understand the meaning of words perhaps you should know how to use them.

  • @teolong9
    @teolong9 5 ปีที่แล้ว +708

    Apple was not mentioned because they'll wait this out and then they will come out with their own "innovation" and will be called of course Mac iQ

    • @austinverlinden2236
      @austinverlinden2236 5 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      teo long apple isn’t in the enterprise industry anymore. Quantum computers will never be available to consumer. At least for now. It’s only in its development staged and even then will only be commercially used

    • @teolong9
      @teolong9 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@austinverlinden2236 thanks Austin.

    • @ilyaaslunat8382
      @ilyaaslunat8382 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Austin Verlinden pe

    • @kevinwho.
      @kevinwho. 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      teo long Don’t remember asking

    • @luzherrera4463
      @luzherrera4463 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@austinverlinden2236 i mean, the same was said about microchips and look at us now

  • @tme98
    @tme98 5 ปีที่แล้ว +891

    finally a computer that can properly run minecraft with shaders

    • @pastplayclashofclans
      @pastplayclashofclans 5 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      Is math Related to Science

    • @raptorm8242
      @raptorm8242 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      past play - gaming I’m related to my cousin but that doesn’t stop me

    • @itstwilight7417
      @itstwilight7417 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      RaptorM82 hold up

    • @Crurned
      @Crurned 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      That would be a quantum graphic card.

    • @IWR_YT
      @IWR_YT 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Dude this thing sent a signal over THE FRICKING MULTIVERSE

  • @leonardgibney2997
    @leonardgibney2997 4 ปีที่แล้ว +71

    I've still not totally figured my old DVD recorder out.

    • @burnem2166
      @burnem2166 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      😅 same here

    • @Charlene.888
      @Charlene.888 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Love it!

  • @venceremosallende422
    @venceremosallende422 5 ปีที่แล้ว +241

    The one really important question: Why do quantum computers always hang down from the ceiling?

    • @muslimyouthcongress9541
      @muslimyouthcongress9541 4 ปีที่แล้ว +110

      Like balls to be cool for heat of body

    • @Crurned
      @Crurned 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      GLADOS

    • @hensen5309
      @hensen5309 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      they don't.

    • @venceremosallende422
      @venceremosallende422 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Hensen Prove it

    • @hensen5309
      @hensen5309 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@venceremosallende422 the D-Wave system was one of the first ones NASA and Google bought. geordie rose made it. you should listen to him explain the D wave. it's almost scary.

  • @peterwonaprize
    @peterwonaprize 5 ปีที่แล้ว +975

    This is like trying to explain smartphones in the Dust Bowl era.

    • @solvox5217
      @solvox5217 5 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      @@AstroKitty16 many like me watch em to see the progress of the tech.more interesting than watching most things with your morning coffee

    • @raptorm8242
      @raptorm8242 4 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      mcnuggs ur moms passy is a dust bowl

    • @jose162204
      @jose162204 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@AstroKitty16 I mean, they didn't get any wrong. As CS grad-major I can confidently say they gave a pretty accurate explanation. The fact that you didn't even hit play means you can't possibly know if the content is correct or not. What exactly about this video is incorrect/objectionable/or misleading?

    • @thecatpersonuk9962
      @thecatpersonuk9962 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Or non incest

    • @jbone9900
      @jbone9900 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@jose162204 most of it can be a lie and I wouldn't know.

  • @MrBLAA
    @MrBLAA 5 ปีที่แล้ว +544

    Holy crap... did CNBC just explain qbits, better than my other engineering/science channels 👏😉

    • @rafijoarder
      @rafijoarder 5 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Yep, main stream tv network infos even boring always tops anything on TH-cam / internet videos. And if main stream tv network comes into TH-cam, you already know they come in as the elephant.

    • @fahimp3
      @fahimp3 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@rafijoarder Mostly because they have the resources.

    • @lamesnareman
      @lamesnareman 5 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@rafijoarder not always. Not nearly always. but certainly this time.

    • @michaelchumpitaz912
      @michaelchumpitaz912 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Try Kurzgesagt - In a Nutshell, they explain quantum computing very simple as well.

    • @Johnrich395
      @Johnrich395 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      No they didn't, because I still don't get it. I know that it's supposed to be "better", but I have yet to understand WHY. If a Qbit can be both 0 and 1, how do you determine if it should be a 0 or a 1? Classical computing is 1101 in and 10 out, from what they said Quantum is XXXX in and XX out. You don't know what your answer is, what your input is, or whether the output is correct because what if the Qbit was supposed to be a 1 and it decided to be a 0? Obviously it is giving something that is a reasonable output, so I assume that a quantum computer is "good", but it hasn't been explained properly yet.

  • @elsiegel84
    @elsiegel84 5 ปีที่แล้ว +446

    Remember that when first invented lasers were described as a technology looking for an application. Now look, they are everywhere.

    • @charmander777
      @charmander777 5 ปีที่แล้ว +54

      I'm pretty sure quantum computing is alot more hyped than lasers ever were and the engineering challenges much bigger

    • @no_oil_what
      @no_oil_what 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@charmander777 Lets get past Absolute Zero! then there may be hope. The energy alone will be a killer!

    • @WarriorsPhoto
      @WarriorsPhoto 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Good point there.

    • @frankyflowers
      @frankyflowers 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@charmander777 they can do all the computing on the moon and use the helium3 and plutonium to cool and power super reactors that spill radiation all over but who cares because its the moon.

    • @ANJIN-p4q
      @ANJIN-p4q 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Don't be frightened by evolution. Expect massive technological chances in the near future.

  • @HiddenMasters
    @HiddenMasters 5 ปีที่แล้ว +263

    so you're telling me there's a chance....

  • @osaretino1664
    @osaretino1664 4 ปีที่แล้ว +242

    Legend has it GTA 5 can load in 2.25 seconds on this computer.

    • @liamluke347
      @liamluke347 4 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      I know this is a joke but i honestly think it would load instantly.

    • @knyt0
      @knyt0 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@liamluke347 it loads slowly not because you have to load a bunch of things, but because the net code is trash, doesnt matter how fast your pc is

    • @darklex5150
      @darklex5150 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@knyt0 so you're saying that even if my pc is a monster gta 5 will load slowly aniway?
      I wasted 10.000 dollars on nothing :(
      I hate you :'(

    • @knyt0
      @knyt0 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@darklex5150 it'll be faster for singleplayer, not for online though

    • @darklex5150
      @darklex5150 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@knyt0 but i bought it especifically for the loading times.
      :(

  • @sridhar-natuva
    @sridhar-natuva 5 ปีที่แล้ว +358

    Seems like a first computer that fits in big room. Am i in 1950’s of quantum computing era?

    • @DanielNyong
      @DanielNyong 5 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @SugarDaddy1963 that would not be possible, we cant make deep freezers the size of smartphones my guess is that they would be on the cloud.

    • @stillnotspicy
      @stillnotspicy 5 ปีที่แล้ว +43

      @@DanielNyong maybe we figure out a way to build smaller quantum computers by understanding how we wouldnt need cold temperatures.

    • @grimjowjaggerjak
      @grimjowjaggerjak 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@DanielNyong You just need super conductors that works in room temperature, no ?

    • @spenser6353
      @spenser6353 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sridhar Natuva just more technology that will allow governments to invade your privacy and curb your civil rights.

    • @dr.vikyll7466
      @dr.vikyll7466 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@DanielNyong it is probably possible it just takes a shitton of energy and tech we might not yet have.

  • @jammer1993
    @jammer1993 5 ปีที่แล้ว +174

    *But,* can it run crysis ?

    • @MCRuCr
      @MCRuCr 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      No.

    • @thebaws7289
      @thebaws7289 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Absolutely not

    • @adtc
      @adtc 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      No

    • @dddmemaybe
      @dddmemaybe 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      yes but only if the game is as frozen as the qubit chips.

    • @hansheum
      @hansheum 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes. (Eventually.)

  • @NBAasDOGG
    @NBAasDOGG 5 ปีที่แล้ว +225

    The world is basically separated into "humans" and "scientists".
    From my experience there is also a communication problem between them.

    • @Jericho93py
      @Jericho93py 5 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      "Humans" and "rulers"
      the scientists are just a few pawns more

    • @mosaedits5707
      @mosaedits5707 5 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      The scientists are at the end of the day the ones with the realy important secrets that cannot be simplified without losing vital information for less knowledgeable minds of the general population.

    • @britefeather
      @britefeather 5 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      Especially today where society is leaning more away from logic and more towards emotions.
      If you want to communicate science these days it has to be 80% emotional appeal. Just look at climate change.

    • @mosaedits5707
      @mosaedits5707 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Dam straight the only way to progresss is to cut the bull crap out and use facts and logic and neither of those care about your feelings.
      The issue with climate change is that it has been so entwines with politics that finding the solution is often so complex due to the lack of knowledge of the general public that they will say it isn’t a solution and there is no solution there is just ways of slowing it down.

    • @m2heavyindustries378
      @m2heavyindustries378 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@britefeather ok boomer

  • @isaklalnunchama1806
    @isaklalnunchama1806 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    0:00 - introduction
    4:25 - quantum
    6:18 - how it works
    8:37 - normal computer
    13:46 - conclusion

  • @vzangla
    @vzangla 3 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    The real geniuses are the ones that got funding for this decades long project requiring no deliverables and allows them to play in a lab all day long and get paid for it.

    • @allwheeldrive
      @allwheeldrive 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Gotta start somewhere. Like space travel, right? Or medicine. Or metallurgy. These are all time-sinks. Someday...

    • @nczioox1116
      @nczioox1116 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      What makes you think they dont have deliverables and get to "play" all day?

    • @nczioox1116
      @nczioox1116 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @E. W. Buy google stock and retire early

    • @robertplatt1693
      @robertplatt1693 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Companies have limitless oceans of cash. Plenty of justification.

  • @kinngrimm
    @kinngrimm 5 ปีที่แล้ว +115

    12:49 Cisco having quantum encryption as an option would be ok i guess, but could they start with first not having NSA backdoors? Just a thought ^^

    • @gregorymalchuk272
      @gregorymalchuk272 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Is Cisco known for creating backdoors?

    • @jamestafiltafish5282
      @jamestafiltafish5282 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Gregory Malchuk we can't be sure but looking at the Snowden leaks it's hard to say that those Cisco vulns weren't intentional

    • @kinngrimm
      @kinngrimm 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@gregorymalchuk272 till Snowden made them public many were only known to the NSA i would assume. So to be fair, perhaps they themselves didn't know. Then again we know from other companies that the NSA approached those to keep these open. I can't say for sure if they were intentionally created, for that my understanding of that area of expertise is not sufficient.
      So the only once really known for creating such backdoors are security agencies around the world to spy on their own citizens or onto those of other countries.
      Better question may be, is Cisco known for closing these backdoors? Again i have not sufficient information to answer that question. Perhaps others could provide some insight here.

  • @Andrewlang90
    @Andrewlang90 5 ปีที่แล้ว +161

    Question: if a quantum computer can figure out an answer that takes a super computer a projected 10,000 years, how do we know that the answer is correct?

    • @qbeenzotherside
      @qbeenzotherside 5 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Im the answer to that question

    • @ismailerdem2060
      @ismailerdem2060 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Experiments

    • @Mark-vn7et
      @Mark-vn7et 5 ปีที่แล้ว +63

      By testing the answer. For example humanity is stuck for decades on curing some deseases like cancer, if the computer tells you the answer you just test it in the real word if it’s correct.
      How many times did you try solving some kind of puzzle and after you solved it the answer is so simple and easy. Now make the puzzle a million times harder but someone tells you the answer. This computer tells you the answer directly

    • @Andrewlang90
      @Andrewlang90 5 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      Mark Thanks. The answer to my question was easier then I thought

    • @SilentKnight43
      @SilentKnight43 5 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Just ask any woman.

  • @macberry4048
    @macberry4048 5 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I really appreciate this video laying out the timeline for quantum computing instead of the optimistic stories about robots and artificial intelligence. The part about simulating molecules was interesting and I have heard about IBM using quantum to find new battery technologies

  • @ruzzelladrian907
    @ruzzelladrian907 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    10:40 I love how he simplified it. Thanks!

  • @db417
    @db417 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    2:34. How do we know that answer the sigamore or whatever spewed out was correct and not some random number ?

  • @freekvonk8586
    @freekvonk8586 5 ปีที่แล้ว +149

    I acctually had an internship where I made parts for these things. Its so cool to see a whole bunch of these things in 1 room.

    • @07Akash10
      @07Akash10 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Lucky

    • @jonathanng138
      @jonathanng138 4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      @@07Akash10 hard work and dedication*

    • @TMEG94
      @TMEG94 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Kk grote vis

    • @BubtheBubble
      @BubtheBubble 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TMEG94 STEEK EM IN Z ERUG

    • @EJD339
      @EJD339 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jonathanng138 while I definitely luck does play a huge role in the world you can completely luck your way into an engineering/science field lol

  • @AndresRodriguez-uo1kt
    @AndresRodriguez-uo1kt 5 ปีที่แล้ว +54

    And this is how humans give birth to AI, to the gods

    • @stefanluginger3682
      @stefanluginger3682 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Andres Rodriguez No. A quantum computer can calculate nothing better or different things !!! as an usual. The algorithm are even harder to invent and for most cases it’s not even sure if algorithm are possible to construct at any time.

    • @nachannachle2706
      @nachannachle2706 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      AI is a myth. There is ALWAYS a human being behind the tech.

    • @djosearth3618
      @djosearth3618 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I don't think that current Neural Nets have proven to be a good application whatsoever for QC. At least not yet?

    • @nathannewman6555
      @nathannewman6555 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@nachannachle2706 AI stands for artificial intelligence. Its a myth that the intelligence of a computer is artificial?

    • @madman4286
      @madman4286 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nachannachle2706 Artificial means man made, so the name means intelligence made by humans, where is the myth?

  • @powersettingsm7172
    @powersettingsm7172 5 ปีที่แล้ว +254

    Finally i can run minecraft on full settings.

    • @prammar1951
      @prammar1951 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Mozart is interested in quantum computing... WOW

    • @pikilupikiluu9784
      @pikilupikiluu9784 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes you can

    • @Anon-xd3cf
      @Anon-xd3cf 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm not sure you understand how true that statement is...
      With a practical working quantum supercomputer and an accurate algorithm to simulate protein folding...

    • @powersettingsm7172
      @powersettingsm7172 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Anon-xd3cf you sound like one of those people who knows joe. He's a smart guy

    • @koburrr
      @koburrr 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@powersettingsm7172 who's joe? ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

  • @TheTechFuturist
    @TheTechFuturist ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Interesting video on the topic of quantum computing. I appreciate the clear explanation of the technology and its potential impact on various industries. It's exciting to see the progress being made in this field and the possibilities it holds for the future.

  • @antoniomaglione4101
    @antoniomaglione4101 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Not many have realised that qubits are analogic entities...
    Also, in the '80s IBM was using Josephson junctions (supercold niobium-tantalum) to achieve 2 GHz of clock speed, at a time when silicon junctions were operating at 4.77 MHz - yes, the 8088.
    Thanks for the video...

  • @raytsh
    @raytsh 5 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    It was weird hearing the vinyl needle scratch sound while seeing a reel to reel tape machine.

    • @Initial_Gopnik
      @Initial_Gopnik 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Frank O whoever edited it must’ve never heard a dirty head before

  • @OmgBrainZIZ
    @OmgBrainZIZ 5 ปีที่แล้ว +78

    This is amazing. I really hope it becomes the technology of the century, and that it does not remain the tech of the future.

    • @SublimeSun666
      @SublimeSun666 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Quit copying what the narrator says...

    • @OmgBrainZIZ
      @OmgBrainZIZ 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Trvp visuals what😂😂

    • @johnsmith6974
      @johnsmith6974 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It would be awesome...no more politicians just computers

    • @frankyflowers
      @frankyflowers 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Schmelly G. we will run out of helium right when we start to depend on quantum computing

    • @ukpkmkk_2
      @ukpkmkk_2 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Are you so excited about the FBI and NSA having the ability to spy on everything around you??
      The only thing that stops them from cracking every encrypted data in the universe is the lack of powerful computers that can brute-force such encryptions.

  • @KitwiSauce
    @KitwiSauce 5 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    This really is the 20’s huh, damn

    • @FeedEgg
      @FeedEgg 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      The future is now.

    • @mustafa-cx2fg
      @mustafa-cx2fg 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      the future is now old man

    • @Thezombiekiller06
      @Thezombiekiller06 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I hope they make a cure for aging like nanotech or a pill or something. I'd prefer nanotech

  • @definition.of.insanity
    @definition.of.insanity 4 ปีที่แล้ว +47

    "A completely arbitrary mathematical problem with no real world application" So basically every math problem i solved from kindergarten to high-school.

    • @POLARTTYRTM
      @POLARTTYRTM 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I feel that.

    • @hexados7479
      @hexados7479 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I wonder if it can answer why Jenny has 62 bottles of dish soap

    • @jbone9900
      @jbone9900 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hexados7479 because she's a he

    • @SirThreepio
      @SirThreepio 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Tell this to your boring teachers. Many people use math every day and most of them are not scientists or mathematicians.

    • @chinossynthesizer705
      @chinossynthesizer705 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@SirThreepio math teacher

  • @BlueDolphinBlues
    @BlueDolphinBlues 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Quoted from the video "there are some simply astonishing financial opportunities in quantum computing". My thoughts... When will humans realize that money and power is worthless in comparison to living a life full of natural experience and human interaction? I would like to see humanity put it's efforts to building stronger communities not richer communities.

  • @jujubean8870
    @jujubean8870 5 ปีที่แล้ว +125

    Observation: Constantly showcasing various numbers in bold black font with a marigold background will always look like a p**nhub logo.

    • @maison8822
      @maison8822 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Is this a HK-47 reference

    • @redphoenix2m101
      @redphoenix2m101 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Explanation: We are all HK droids in one way or another

    • @selkim7426
      @selkim7426 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Just say the word dont be shy

  • @charleyhoward4594
    @charleyhoward4594 5 ปีที่แล้ว +107

    Quantum Computers: Wall Street to be able to use them to optimize portfolios (i.e. be able to rip off Main Street with alacrity …)

    • @jerrybender6633
      @jerrybender6633 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      bang on ma man

    • @user-lt6lg9lv7j
      @user-lt6lg9lv7j 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Star Trek Theory Where do you people even come from...

    • @freekvonk8586
      @freekvonk8586 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Star Trek Theory I had an internship where they make these machines and can tell you they're very real

    • @freekvonk8586
      @freekvonk8586 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @Star Trek Theory We made the cryogenic coolers not the chips, and shipped them to various universities and companies.

    • @edo-san
      @edo-san 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Star Trek Theory Bending not Breaking.

  • @dom2555
    @dom2555 5 ปีที่แล้ว +81

    Google Sycamore still not enough powerful to run Chrome properly

    • @MrKZdemos
      @MrKZdemos 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Firefox

    • @dom2555
      @dom2555 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Lucas Zhu nerds... poor sense of humor

  • @AAvfx
    @AAvfx 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Google: Quantum computing.
    Meanwhile, titles are out of sync!

  • @scottsobon9256
    @scottsobon9256 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think these qubits actually are in three different spots in three different forms of matter (liquid, solid and gas). These states are going in and out of our observable dimension (why it can be in multiple spots at once in three forms). Since it’s in all forms it allows it to form to whichever is needed to perform that task at hand. When we freeze or keep the qubits at almost absolute 0 only slows down the process of it going in and out....

  • @pantherasad2114
    @pantherasad2114 5 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    It's ridiculous that the advancement of our species only goes as far as the interest of investors and potential financial opportunities.

    • @tomasimpresarijus9426
      @tomasimpresarijus9426 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      But when you look at how far we have come, maybe it's not so bad after all.

    • @gregorymalchuk272
      @gregorymalchuk272 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We need to use this vast computing power to achieve biological immortality and tissue regeneration.

    • @m2heavyindustries378
      @m2heavyindustries378 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I don't see you inventing something unique for charity. Other than complaints of course

  • @basstherapyasmr
    @basstherapyasmr 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    This is what excites me as a budding software developer studying A.I. I'm immensely interested in the possibilities fully harnessing this technology could give us to that end and many other fields!

    • @hansheum
      @hansheum 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Quantum machine learning is a huge and super fascinating area of research - definitely something to read up on if you have the time and interest!

  • @bryanbennett1659
    @bryanbennett1659 5 ปีที่แล้ว +87

    The “quarky” nature of quantum physics

    • @paulprochnow
      @paulprochnow 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      There is a right hand and left hand shadow universe as we name it

    • @rayang9929
      @rayang9929 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      all puns implied

    • @beelzeboo
      @beelzeboo 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @Star Trek Theory photon teleportation says otherwise

    • @edo-san
      @edo-san 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Star Trek Theory Really, do know what is G & S Relatively?

    • @edo-san
      @edo-san 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Star Trek Theory Or the law of Light

  • @rayoflight6220
    @rayoflight6220 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    They need to have the quantum computers working in a stable fashion. For the time being, the time when the state of superposition is kept in sync between the qubit and the output interface, is very limited. If this is not sorted, quantum computers will remain an expensive toy, good only to sustain speculations of any kind.

  • @markjmaxwell9819
    @markjmaxwell9819 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I once described quantum computers as trying to design a human brain .
    And the reason l explained it in this way is because the errors and the way a qubit is designed has a close similarity to the way a human brain operates.
    Schrodinger's cat comes to mind when trying to explain some of the issues that quantum computers experience.
    It may never be possible to build one 100% error free .

    • @igorschmidlapp6987
      @igorschmidlapp6987 ปีที่แล้ว

      It will NEVER be error free, because it was made by man...
      I'm a pessimist... Schrodinger's cat is dead... ;-P

  • @rendermanpro
    @rendermanpro 5 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Regarding "Google's scientists" just make freaking Goolge Chome working well for a start point

  • @SilentKnight43
    @SilentKnight43 5 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I remember when University of Toronto removed the roof of their computer lab to install one of the early versions of the Cray. It was lowered into place with a Sikorsky helicopter. Now my smartphone rivals its power.

  • @kadalijo2806
    @kadalijo2806 5 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    It looks like the thing from steampunk films.

    • @quantumcomputing5618
      @quantumcomputing5618 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      A couple of years ago, Wired referred to a quantum cryostat as a "steampunk chandelier."

  • @robertwhitten265
    @robertwhitten265 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    "Nuclear fusion destined to always be the technology of the future, never the present". Ah.. fusion bomb has been around since the early 50s.

    • @robertwhitten265
      @robertwhitten265 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@subverter1.188 Fission was around in the 40's e.g. Hiroshima, fusion came in the 50s, a.k.a. H bomb.

    • @RohithRPai
      @RohithRPai 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think she meant controlled Nuclear Fusion. We have never been able to control the Fusion process as we did with fission, which facilities it usage in the production of electricity.

    • @bingefinance5247
      @bingefinance5247 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I talk about this in my latest video .. the trouble (as I see it) is that a quantum computer with 50 qubits is very powerful in a very specific way. In order to get a boarder, more generalised quantum computer, we are going to need 1 million ish qubits (so they say). Can these things scale or will the atoms start acting up and proving impossible to scale?!

  • @kazmroz8948
    @kazmroz8948 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The real hype is that qbits ultimately depend on waves, to exist, before they can even be used to do anything.
    But waves were first observed in the 1600's, at the macro scale when Huygens became the first to attributed waves to the scale of light. But in the 1960's, those macro scale waves were all analyzed to be found to be artifacts. Ask any marine engineer. So Huygens attributed an artifact, to the scale of light and that is what has been used until the 1920s when that became a problem, or did not work in the 2 slit experiment. So that was added to by wave-particle duality to try and make waves work; but notice that the waves (known to be an artifact) was still in that mix. That still did not work so it was converted to wave-function. But that also did not work, and notice that waves, an artifact, was still in that mix despite being known to be an artifact. That is why waves interfere with qbits, both of which depend on an artifact, thereby nullifying each other by being dependent on that artifact. An artifact can't be made to be a non-artifact or into a mechanism by using math or anything else.

  • @griffca4814
    @griffca4814 5 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    "Wall Street can use it to optimize portfolios" Oh sweet Lord no!

    • @cobblebrick
      @cobblebrick 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why?

    • @yusukeheller3451
      @yusukeheller3451 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Lol... this aged like a fine wine. Currently- wallstreetbets exposing corruption in the market.

  • @MrPaceTv
    @MrPaceTv 5 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    I was more shocked to see IBM around than Quantum Computers.😂

    • @motherlandbot6837
      @motherlandbot6837 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Enrique Really? 😆😆😆😆😆😆😆!!

    • @motherlandbot6837
      @motherlandbot6837 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Enrique dfarq.homeip.net/what-does-ibm-do-now/
      No. IBM makes, services, and supports minicomputers and mainframes, which are relics of the past that are still very useful for many applications.
      IBM does NOT make Macs. They DO use Macs in their own offices, because most of their office staff prefer Macs to Windows based systems.
      IBM sold their microcomputer business to Lenovo, which is now the world's #1 microcomputer company. www.pcmag.com/commentary/334149/10-years-later-looking-back-at-the-ibm-lenovo-pc-deal
      The first computers I ever used were IBM PCs running PC DOS with 8086 and 8088 CPUs. How times have changed!

    • @megaprimegamer1184
      @megaprimegamer1184 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Enrique They deal with enterprise level products more...

    • @hmm396
      @hmm396 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Enrique You seem to be very tech illiterate

    • @motherlandbot6837
      @motherlandbot6837 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Edvin Tabakovic Or else he's just joking.

  • @retrodaredevil
    @retrodaredevil 5 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    I think quantum computers are the future.
    But I also think they aren't the future.

    • @wakingchristian
      @wakingchristian 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Well they are the future and they aren't the future.

    • @kishenpatel2481
      @kishenpatel2481 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      They are the future but there will be no future....

    • @nachannachle2706
      @nachannachle2706 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think they are a load of BS hype.

    • @davidmella1174
      @davidmella1174 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      They are the future but never the present. Get the joke?

    • @FeedEgg
      @FeedEgg 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      oh god HERE WE GO *head explodes into nuclear fire*

  • @alexanderpaulino3303
    @alexanderpaulino3303 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can you calculate how many flops it can do? And what is it’s processing power per qubit

  • @Reasonist
    @Reasonist 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Dang that’s a lot of gold on that comp

  • @razen944
    @razen944 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Since cellphones are at the peak right now, I imagine that the next generation of phones could be build with quantum computers. But I can't imagine what the average consumer could use them for

  • @balasubr2252
    @balasubr2252 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The practical problems a quantum computer can help solve might be those that are intersectional such as natural languages and the dynamic contexts of conversations where meanings, their understanding/interpretations are unpredictable. The societal problem of communication or the lack there of due to the ever evolving conditions and initial thoughts might be a challenging enough problem that needs capabilities beyond the classical, I think

  • @stephanwilliams4143
    @stephanwilliams4143 5 ปีที่แล้ว +166

    Sounds like quantum computers are exactly the weapon AI needs to destroy humans

    • @Jericho93py
      @Jericho93py 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      To finally manipulate our mind at the quantum level, whether to make our lives a real pleasure or the worst of the unimaginable torments,
      worse than the apocalypse in the bible.

    • @OHOHOHCOME
      @OHOHOHCOME 5 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Lol ignorant idiots on youtube forecasting doomsday LOL

    • @AI_Flight_Engineer
      @AI_Flight_Engineer 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Mind meld with me and become one Borg like - resistance is futile - upgrading compulsory. AI will stimulate parts of your brain most pharmaceuticals can't touch and give you intelligence 10000 more powerful than human. Seriously if you become a Borg person with AI + a quantum computer chips: trust me YOU will NOT be the one in charge even if it is part of your brain.

    • @zeppkfw
      @zeppkfw 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Jericho93py MUH QUANTUM SPACE LEVELS USED BY THE ETHNOSTATE DEEPSTATE FASCIST STATE GOVERNMENT

    • @kumardigvijaymishra5945
      @kumardigvijaymishra5945 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      QC, cold fusion, immortality, star trekking, and AI all are close to fiction.

  • @juztanuder9242
    @juztanuder9242 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    One method is by using quantum elements to obtain it, using the cooling method. The other one is using numbers outside of 0 and 1.

  • @alberteinstein2291
    @alberteinstein2291 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Did the subtitles get messed up in the middle?

  • @davidgeorge5109
    @davidgeorge5109 5 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Happy I’m studying computer science, this is dope.

  • @KOTYAR0
    @KOTYAR0 5 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Subtitles aren't synced up to the video

    • @coolkrishnan
      @coolkrishnan 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Try Auto generated from TH-cam. That's better

  • @RhinoXpress
    @RhinoXpress 5 ปีที่แล้ว +49

    That thing looks like something that came out of the late 1800's.

    • @Erikpdx
      @Erikpdx 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Steampunk

  • @hensen5309
    @hensen5309 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    so where's the screen? does it hook up to a mouse and keyboard and monitor? can it go on the internet and go to Facebook or does it only run certain programs?

  • @Another_Random_Dave
    @Another_Random_Dave 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    These animated illustrations are amazing.

  • @lukeyleksty4905
    @lukeyleksty4905 5 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    But can it run crisis?

  • @jadelee6150
    @jadelee6150 5 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    so It's a yes or no, or a maybe, a computer that can guess.

    • @AliMohamed-yq4wn
      @AliMohamed-yq4wn 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Jade lee guess very well

    • @rebelo2025
      @rebelo2025 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      A computer that can guess on its own and cancel out wrong solutions in a matter of seconds.

    • @minhpham5207
      @minhpham5207 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      No. That’s a Nondeterministic turing machine, which is not quantum. Quantum turing machines are more like computers that can guess correctly with some probability

  • @azmattic306
    @azmattic306 5 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    I can't wait till one day the human race can simulate a caffeine molecule.

    • @kazomazo6646
      @kazomazo6646 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      What does that even mean? Simulate a caffeine molecule ?! Like a 3D simulation to it or what?

    • @Smb2886
      @Smb2886 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Kazo Mazo watch the tv show devs on Hulu that’ll dumb it down more it’ll make you think god is a quantum computer

    • @chastetree
      @chastetree 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@kazomazo6646 It would let scientists model all the energy states of the actual molecule. Take a look at the Wikipedia article on the hydrogen atom to get a feel for what's involved for even the simplest atom. If you could model drugs and their receptors you could accurately design new drugs without the lengthy, costly trial and error necessary today, never mind making huge strides in understanding how biology works.

    • @onelegd1
      @onelegd1 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      If you simulate the caffeine molecule can you inversely simulated the decaffeine molecule?

    • @dumiicris2694
      @dumiicris2694 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kazomazo6646 yeah u buy one machine not food

  • @Enxvinity
    @Enxvinity 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Need that for gaming, please. NOW

  • @Rikz72
    @Rikz72 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    And 2 years later from this upload, IBM just announced their 433 qubit quantum computer named Osprey.

  • @jefffradsham2297
    @jefffradsham2297 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    axtually, Quantum computing would really take Doom to a new level.

  • @eduardoramirezjr4403
    @eduardoramirezjr4403 5 ปีที่แล้ว +54

    Quantum computing is “spooky” science...

    • @jessicasmith7102
      @jessicasmith7102 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's accurate.

    • @x000s2
      @x000s2 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Not if you actually know anything about quantum physics

    • @eduardoramirezjr4403
      @eduardoramirezjr4403 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      X000S “spooky science” is how Albert Einstein referred to Quantum science.

    • @x000s2
      @x000s2 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@eduardoramirezjr4403 It was spooky then, but not now. It's only recently that more people are finding out what we we've been doing with quantum

    • @Dogscatsbikes
      @Dogscatsbikes 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      “Spooky action from a distance”

  • @TheMwowner1
    @TheMwowner1 5 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    "And we can solve problems plaguing businesses for decades"

  • @DATKNOCKDESIGN
    @DATKNOCKDESIGN 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm falling in love with computing all over again

  • @Goldpenny1
    @Goldpenny1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Best video so far on this subject

  • @WarriorsPhoto
    @WarriorsPhoto 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    All new technologies can be useful tools. As the one gentleman said we'll need to be prepared to harness this new tool when it appears. Good report thank you.

  • @Shaurya_Pant
    @Shaurya_Pant 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Really nice and informative video. Thanks for this great content. You earned a subscriber. Keep up the good work.

  • @adtc
    @adtc 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Honestly yeah, this was the best explanation I've ever gotten about qbits and quantum chips. Great work, CNBC! I only have one question. What the heck does it mean to "store" a caffeine molecule in a computer?

    • @g4tlan
      @g4tlan 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I think it means spilling coffee on your keyboard

    • @julianp430
      @julianp430 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      adtc I believe he’s talking about simulating caffeine molecules on a classical vs quantum computer

  • @isomane7911
    @isomane7911 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    i dont understand something, would anyone mind explaining ?
    in 8:00-8:15 he says that its cooled to about 0,01s of a degree over absolute zero and the video shows -273,28°
    i thought the absolute zero is -273,15° ?

  • @floydster23
    @floydster23 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Australian / Dutch research team just worked out how to get them to work at 1.5 Kelvin instead of 0.1 Kelvin. Doesn't sound like much but it brings silicon into the mix and much cheaper cooling.

  • @KOLDBLU3ST33L
    @KOLDBLU3ST33L 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Micro-dosing magic mushrooms IS opening scary creativity.

  • @thatunknowndoot
    @thatunknowndoot 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Now I can lose at chess 1,000,000x faster!

  • @Karyabs
    @Karyabs 5 ปีที่แล้ว +58

    As Einstein once said, an intelligent fool makes things more complex.

    • @benjamin7114
      @benjamin7114 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Definitely feels like what is happening here .

    • @The_Chowmein_Papi
      @The_Chowmein_Papi 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      This wasn't Einstein, it was in E.F. Schumacher's 1973 book, "Small is Beautiful: A Study of Economics As If People Mattered".

    • @carknower
      @carknower 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Imagine stepping into your room and it’s dark. You walk around slowly with your hands out as feelers but you know more or less where you’re going.
      Now imagine the lights coming on for a second, enough for you to get composure. You continue this until you get what you wanted from your room and leave.
      If you’re a quantum computer the light is both on and off at the same time but you’re in a different room.
      How much easier is it to find the “blue bottle?”

    • @amorag59
      @amorag59 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @B. Allen It gets to a point where dumbing down complicated things does not help more, just introduces more things for the imaginary to try and link what is what to the real world system lol.

    • @amorag59
      @amorag59 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @B. Allen As in: taking us on a mental wild goose chase doesn't help more.
      Edit: rather than introducing more things for the mind to keep track of just explain quantum computing - perhaps with more simple terms, but not out of context scenarios like @interloop did.

  • @nickrowell2651
    @nickrowell2651 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This is far greater than my mind can comprehend

    • @rayoflight6220
      @rayoflight6220 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No. You have listened to people who don't know what a quantum computer is, but have tried to explain it anyway.
      The core matter is extremely simple; you only need to grasp the nature of the Schroedinger equation to understand what is a superposition.

  • @usstropicana
    @usstropicana 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have a quantum toaster at home.
    The toasts don't jump out of it.
    They just... stay there.
    Everything is so much cooler
    when you put quantum in front of it...

  • @djartyom924
    @djartyom924 5 ปีที่แล้ว +66

    Imagine using it just to play far cry 2

    • @gold-818
      @gold-818 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      You have captured the diamond.

    • @vendrick4571
      @vendrick4571 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      It’s gonna be used for that my guy. That’s probably what people thought about games for the computer 😂

    • @Bittzen
      @Bittzen 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Maybe we can finally cure our malaria with this

    • @dv7551
      @dv7551 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      DJ Artyom Stream games from one computer and have a hundred people play it at the same computer

  • @blakesagdalen1360
    @blakesagdalen1360 5 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    Quantum Computer + AI = Skynet

    • @Fadli9000
      @Fadli9000 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      And. We become resistant

    • @blockpartyvintage1568
      @blockpartyvintage1568 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactly

    • @Kazilikaya
      @Kazilikaya 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why is this a bad thing?

    • @Sammy-te2xe
      @Sammy-te2xe 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Kazilikaya he just described the movie Terminator, AI starts to fight humanity

  • @opensourceguy730
    @opensourceguy730 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Could quantum computers improve Martin Reynolds’ internet connection?

    • @Octalion
      @Octalion 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      The computer is not the connection

  • @kc-me6wl
    @kc-me6wl 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    10:22 - woah- Devs tv show really did their homework...makes sense some of what was going on in the show now listening to what Bob Sutor was saying...

  • @invoker7826
    @invoker7826 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Quantum computing, AI, and Nuclear Fusion are the 3 technological frontiers that will change the world in an unimaginable way. I wonder if I will live long enough to see their real life applications.

  • @Samsgarden
    @Samsgarden 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I love how advocates plug this technology under the guise of problem solving but we know perfectly well that they will create more problems than they solve, including human redundancy

    • @sertaoexpedicoes
      @sertaoexpedicoes 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      So true!! It's a blind dive into human misery. No need for machines to solve human problems...

  • @noorshakib5722
    @noorshakib5722 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Really informative 😇⚡🤙

  • @HimeshKundal
    @HimeshKundal 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is it available on Amazon ?
    I wanna but it.

  • @Quismo12
    @Quismo12 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Remember how we had just a few kilobytes of data in our computers? This time we are starting from 50.

  • @PRmoustache88
    @PRmoustache88 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    When will Joe Blow be able to get a personal quantum computer?

  • @danki2000daniel
    @danki2000daniel 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Can it calculate pi to the last digit?

    • @ukpkmkk_2
      @ukpkmkk_2 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Nothing can no matter how fancy the name of it is.

    • @normalguy2824
      @normalguy2824 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ukpkmkk_2 that's not completely true

    • @someone2973
      @someone2973 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      There is no last digit of pi as it is an irrational number with an infinite number of digits after the decimal point.

    • @ukpkmkk_2
      @ukpkmkk_2 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@normalguy2824 can you tell me how it is not true?? ... After one point you get in a loop so no matter how powerful your PC is it might identify when it starts to loop and for how many digits but not the last digit as there is no last digit in a loop.

    • @Minsc
      @Minsc 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ukpkmkk_2 Once in a while I have the amusing thought that, if calculated long enough, 1/3 will eventually stop repeating.

  • @deletevil
    @deletevil 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    IBM people always explain the best, bless them !

  • @davidwilkie9551
    @davidwilkie9551 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is the best presentation of why it is important as a research project to understand the Calculus of Holographic Principle Image condensation modulation Mechanism.

  • @maxdegreat566
    @maxdegreat566 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    as a comp sci major i kinda wana work towards this after graduation

  • @edwinlor7932
    @edwinlor7932 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I dont understand how a classic computer is incapable of 'representing' a caffeine molecule. Can someone explain?

    • @nandakumargp
      @nandakumargp 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Simulating atoms are harder than you think.

    • @richie1326
      @richie1326 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes I wondered that too. I thought we had already done this for much larger and more complex molecules than caffeine...

    • @sangouda1645
      @sangouda1645 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      He said 10^48, 1s and 0s are needed. 1 terabyte is 10^12 bytes, that is 10^12 X 8 bits. So it just takes less than 4TB to represent a caffeine molecule, so he is wrong. When he was giving this analogy he looked at someone, may be someone was trying to say he was not entirely correct.

    • @nikolaynicolasnikolayevich
      @nikolaynicolasnikolayevich 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      We've been able to model molecules, like make a representation of them and animate them, but QC in theory could be able to represent them with the fisical propeties of the molecule.