Tonight it will be 40 years from this moment. Thanks for posting. Guys, just feel sorry for the folks who believe this was a hoax. Some of them will have a chance to change their minds over time.
@@kennethkeen4988 No. There are millions that believe. They just all don't feel the need to come onto TH-cam to argue with in-bred, attention-seeking trolls .
Yes clearly a hoax to say they landed on the moon. Few believe 'the moon landing' today as no evidence has been produced except nasty films of 'rockets' popping off the surface made by 'radio-controlled' remote (super high power transmission) cameras stationed on the moon, which despite the transmission time lag managed to send images showing how they tracked the 'ascent' all the way to the mother ship. Awesome eh? 2023 01 19 05:26
Wow! perfect video and audio in realtime from 230,000 miles away In 1969, here it is 50 years later and we can't even get constant cell phone service coverage when talking to someone 20 miles away.. Communications were so much better back then. Boy I can't wait , another 30 years we"'ll be using a telegraph.
The average daytime temperature of the moon is 224.6 degrees Fahrenheit (107° C). Keep in mind that water boils at 212 degrees Fahrenheit (100° C). The average temperature of the far/dark side of the moon is -243.4 degrees Fahrenheit (-153° C). Water freezes at 32 degrees Fahrenheit. Such an obvious lie. Really? They can't even keep A/C working properly in our automobiles! LMAO
@@Tmhen NO ONE, let me repeat "NO ONE" on earth uses the antiquated system of measure TEMPERATURE , except "Americans". Now why it is they cling to this forgotten method of expressing temperature is simply due to the FACT that Americans are to be KEPT BLIND AND DUMB, regarding ANYTHING SCIENTIFIC, because if they were to understand SCIENCE they would very quickly come to the conclusion that they have been CONNED by an establishment, which keeps them fed with nonsense to this very day. But dream on - as George CARLIN said ""The American dream" - you have to be asleep to believe it" !
+Francesco Rizzo (Soft Musix) pay close attention to prior to 0:45 starting at 0:31 seconds.. he is transparent there too..I searched the comments to see if anyone else noticed that as well!
+Francesco Rizzo (Soft Musix) Good observation friend the reason that is well because the camera they used during the filming of the landing is called a Video camera tube(vidicon tube) which holds an image for seconds after and gives off a transparent look.
Sadly @@nickyn4076 is right. Bluntly speaking, it was all a fake but many people believed the film at the time. It was not clearly explained that this was a PR necessity at the time.
1. the flag is waving because he had to twist the two pieces of the pole together. 2. if the were filming this in a CLOSED filming studio how could there be wind to make the flag wave.
@@andrewkozintsev6823 Who said that the studio had all the doors closed? Who said that some scenes were not to be filmed outside? Who believes this crap from nasa, when they don't have the evidence? This is just an amusing stunt pulled off risking no lives, costing very little money and achieving lots of public respect "if it is believed", but unfortunately - people across the globe are educated and don't work with fahrenheits and horses and feet and pounds and yanky wanky trash movies that could be outdone by a ten year old with a half decent Macbook and two days of free time from TV!
If they landed on the moon surface! Which is not, how on earth they managed to come back to earth?!! If they went in 1969 why they didn’t manage to get back to the moon again after all these years and advanced technology.?
@@hypefogg9790 Weird how Neil is so transparent. I can see right through him the whole time almost as good as I can see through this "moon landing" nonsense.
Next-generation cameras provided by Stanley Kubrick were installed on the lander and there were a few handhelds for photos. The footage was automatically taken The camera was retrieved before returning to earth.
There could be many reasons why Neil Armstrong had issues with being a "people person." But, the lack of eye contact HAD to be because he was lying about walking on the Moon... The conspiracy theories are entertaining, if nothing else.
Best is when Americans are trying to appear serious, and then talk about 'a foot and six eights of an inch', just 'awesome' that 330 million suckers can be persuaded to watch this crap!
Where'd you come up with that? The radiation you speak of is in the Van Allen radiation belts above earth's atmosphere. The moon is about 10x higher than that. The amount of ionizing radiation on the Moon's surface is not excessive and would not fog film. Heat on the daytime moon surface would have been a bigger problem, except for no atmosphere, so the heat is not transferred to the film unless the camera is in direct physical contact with the lunar surface, which it never was.
Sunshine without atmosphere creates a temperature of 150˚C on any surface such as a camera, but Mr Harris thinks that 150˚C would not fry his skin nor a celluloid film, he is exceptional - an American education. Whao..... Americans are clearly lost using their 'feet' and 'pounds' and 'Fahrenheits' and "horsepowers' etc Give them a break, decimal is the next stage they will have to deal with if they are to reach the rest of us in the 21st century. Not a chance.
@@kennethkeen4988 Yeah and the Van Allen Belt is what protects us on earth from that very radiation from the sun yet astronauts walk in granny stitched space suits exposed to solar radiation.
@@hypefogg9790 What space shuttle? We are talking about the first so-called trip to the moon. There was no space shuttle with radiation tiles. The space shuttle travels in space it does NOT go to OUTER space. Michio Kaku tells you HIMSELF they have no OUTER SPACE TRAVEL ABILITY. So they NEVER went to the moon (aka outer space) Michio Kaku Tells Us We HAve No Outer Space Travel Ability th-cam.com/video/G3cNBXXsVrE/w-d-xo.html Catch a wake up NASA in Hebrew sounds the same as "deception"
could anybody please explain me how is it possible that without atmosphere - where gravity acceleration should apply equally to objects of any size and mass - sand from the astronauts' boots falls back on the ground faster than the astronauts themselves? ...I also don't understand where the fill-light is coming from since the astronauts are standing in the shadow of the Sun? ....and what are those 3 light sources reflecting on the helmets? thank you!
Also where is the lunar lander rocket blast ? If a landing craft were to land on the moon with all that fine dust and rocks you should have one heck of a blown out crater. Another thing "Where are tall the stars"? We don't see stars while standing on the moon. There is no atmosphere to block them out. The whole thing stinks of one massive cover-up. You know what NASA stands for..... Never A Straight Answer
+D. Hansel - All landing Crafts start the landing burn several meter above the ground, the thruster force would was not able to make a significant impact. And all stars are there, we just can't see it due to the exposure. On the Moon, due to no shadow from mountans or light filtering by a atmosphere the whole Surface is basically a huge lightbulb, the reason the astronauts can see is because they have a secondary visor on their helmets that is tinted (like sunglasses) and for us to not see a huge White glow throught the recording the exposure limit was increased. Basically the video is a few times darker than what it is on the Moon, this covered up all the stars - if you increase the exposure limit on a normal pcicture from the Moon landing the stars return but the Moon and the Astronauts are covered in a Bright light. You know what Google is meant for?Toallowidiotslikeyoutoquicklyfind this information, if you only had looked thorougly.
1. You're an idiot. Try Google. Try learning. Jesus! The Moon is a fucking ROCK! WHY would there be a crater? You're expecting 'top soil' to be blown away? It's.. ROCK! Blow out crater... moron! Another thing... where are all the stars? DUMMY! WATCH a Space Shuttle EVA (walk)... guess what... NO STARS! In that case light reflected from the Earth washes out (over-exposes) the star fields... they wash out. On the Moon... the light reflecting up from the Moon's surface, from the Sun and reflected light from the Lunar Lander WASH OUT the star fields. Take a fucking photography course. What stinks of a cover-up is your complete ignorance of anything you talk about. Go read a book, go play in traffic... make yourself useful.
And dipshit... before you go on about the waving flag on the Moon (so there had to be wind, so they had to be in a studio)... the flag along the top was hung by a ROD... and the bottom of the flag was weighted. The waving was KINETIC ENERGY from the Astronauts having to FORCE the pole into the Moon (it's ROCK, remember?) and it 'waved in the wind' for a while. Do you think (rhetorical... of course you don't) that if they wanted to FAKE the Moon landing they would have intentionally forgot to put up star lights in the sky? Do you think they'd be blowing a flag around? Oh... and there are SEVERAL light sources on the Moon (in case you ask about shadows going in different directions). There's the SUN, the EARTH and reflections of light from the Lunar Lander. Go... run your car in the garage or something. After 50 years with the internet and the sum of human knowledge at your fingertips, if you're too fucking lazy to learn anything... you best go eat a bullet.
@@hypefogg9790 There's no risk, not these days. We have computers - technology and dedication - something that they didn't have in the 1960s. They don't even have a rover - yanks are lost and can't even offer a defence to why they are the biggest losers on the planet.
@@kennethkeen1234 I am guessing you might be Serbian. You salty, I am sorry baby boy? I am sorry that we effortlessly destroyed your pathetic asses to stop your genocide. Oh, not Serbian. Huh, you should be grateful, y'all would be freezing to death without our LNG. Can my big strong boy say thank you?
@@boydrobertson2362 Save your country from obliteration boyd, forget about a 'moon landing' the 31 trillion dollars are to be repaid. PAY UP NOW!!!! 2023 01 19 06:27
@@realmoonknight No. You can't see stars at any time in cities because of light pollution. The light of street lights, house lights, car headlights, etc, bounce off the ground, and into the air. These light waves overpower the light of stars. You can't see stars on the moon because there is 100% reflection of light waves from the sun off the moon surface. The ultimate source of light. These far outpower the starlight. You can see stars during the day, but it is extremely difficult. The difference is that the atmosphere blocks most of the suns light before it reflects off of the earths surface, not allowing an overpowering of similar degrees.
Even if you're joking. To those that (still may) not know... the flag along the top was hung by a ROD... and the bottom of the flag was weighted. The waving was KINETIC ENERGY from the Astronauts having to FORCE the pole into the Moon (it's ROCK, remember?) and it 'waved in the wind' for a while. Try Google... instead of playing your video games doubting accomplishments that are way beyond you awaiting the release of a new iPhone. Moron.
Sure @@vincef.5378 you know what happened, the wind was magnetic. FORCING a pole into ROCK is what Americans try. The cameraman who was there for the arrival was not named, was he later paid at all?
@@kennethkeen4988 there’s no cameraman you nut job there’s a camera that came out of the side of the lunar lander to film neils first steps. Quick google search away
@@jjonahjameson8934 Sorry, but everything I found looked like some teenagers had been given a large mechano set and were told it could be painted grey when finished, but they only had green paint in the end. All the mechanical parts perform absolutely no function, except to fool the viewer into thinking this was a technically advanced ding dong. How the metal parts fit together! It really looks like they could on ly buy the parts in a cheap extinct DIY outlet in Colerado and thought no one would notice! Just cheap and shoddy. 2021 01 22 20:29
Pretty good phone reception from 200,000 plus miles away in 1969. I want to see more of this footage? Why only two minutes of incredible history of landing on the moon? My uncles wedding was like 9 hours plus worth of footage. But I hate it when Nasa only shot a few minutes of video. sad.
They shot a lot of video. This is a montage. I remember watching the landing and every second of them on TV (yes, I'm old). There are literally hours of footage. You could find out more by a simple google search, but I'm sure you're happy in your ignorance.
@@bbofun is twisted from day one. NASA don't make the "hours of footage" available - since they managed to "lose" the originals and no one made a copy - typical YANKY conn-men tricks like a travelling salesman selling snake oil!
@@kennethkeen1234 Speed of light determines the exact amount. If you don't believe in basic science, you are probably a part of the population that would be better of darwined of the face of earth.
the sky? they had to decrease the bright because the sun was too strong cuz no atmosphere, but it happened to "delete" the stars also, the camera is old
@@random3857 dreams -the American dream. You have to be asleep to appreciate it. The robot was in the cabin, another on the outer leg and a third in the rocks as the spaceship took off for earth, sure buddy, they stopped making those robots as they were often mistaken for humans and that was not cool.
It would be too difficult to try to fool people in this day and age. People are no longer as gullible as then and are all keen to spot all the signals of fakery going on. It would really have to happen and NASA explains that today it is impossible as they no longer have the technical ability.
Nasa are not able to explain so don't embarrass the poor men - they are all retired and tired of trying to explain why they were paid so much to tell lies.
@@big4330 And that could handle 230,000 miles away in realtime 720p high-quality refresh, video, and sound FROM 1969. Where would the radio dishes connect. If we had that kind of technology, we could always call with perfect, smooth, crisp video calling and sound.
@@kennethkeen1234 MP4 files do the exact same thing to reduce data usage. I presume NASA wanted to make the signal to earth as data efficient as possible. It sometimes leads to distortion/artefacts on MP4s, so it's not surprising when it lead to the same thing here.
My only concern is that right before he jumps off latter you can see the edge or horizon of the moon through his leg/knee and when he jumps the line/edge/horizon goes through his body almost like it was filmed in front of green screen like a news/weather screen 😂
The US flag unfurled on the Moon was a specially crafted banner designed to stand upright in the low gravity lunar environment. One pole shaft was firmly planted into the ground and held the flag upright. Another pole extended perpendicularly from the top and made sure the flag was fully extended and stretched out. :)
***** Because they were twisting it back and forth to get it to stay in the ground and since there's no air resistance in space it takes longer than normal for the flag to stop moving from the twisting motion
***** because the astronaut was moving its stick. there is no air on the moon so the flag has to overcome less resistance. "Myth busters" made an experiment about it.
The flagpole has a rod at the top, holding the flag straight out. When the astronauts twist and move the flagpole, they're moving the rod relative to the flag and the flag will lag behind the rod, even without an atmosphere.
One does not "believe" science unless they are living in a brain washed cult. The Bible understands the scientific method more than you: "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good."
The problem is - scientists, do NOT work with NASA - no scientist on earth works with fahrenheit, no scientist uses "inches" to describe distance, no scientist uses "horses" to indicate power. In fact NOTHING that NASA claims has any basis in scientific fact. Sorry to be so up front with my statement.
I want to moonwalk(michael jacson moonwalk - not that actually boncing thing) on the moon... SOOOOOO bad!!!! you know when ever traveling to the moon becomes commen that joke's gonna be soo outdated and over done.. but imagine how funny it is the first time anybody does that... ps. the moon landing was technologically too soon. any agree?
It's been so long that we'll need archaeologist to come along on the next lunar landing mission... #MoonwalksInMyLifetime (damn if anything that is worth living for!) Go Nasa! :)
Plenty of light sources on the Moon. Only a complete idiot couldn't figure that out. 1. The Sun. 2. The Earth. 3. Light from the Moon surface (60% glass). 4. from all the angles bouncing off the Lunar Lander. School is out. You're welcome. Try Google next time.
I know its hard to figure out, But Earth has a atmosphere unlike the moon And atmospheres tend to make light a little weird So light principles on earth don't really matter on the Moon
@@hypefogg9790 such a bullshitter - zero science - all just bullshit. "the principles of light" do not apply on the moon. Sure buddy - go back to your Thunderbird Show.
hahah I love how people from european countries say that the moon landings are fake because they are so jealous that there shitty countries have never landed on the moon ^_^ I'm proud to be american !!
We love people like you in Europe. It rescues us from making jokes about others who are simply less fortunate. You had the chance and squandered it, so we laugh at your arrogance. " proud to be american"
And the wanker hadn't even the sense to write in English as Americans just can't manage to get their grammar right - no, that would be too much for their little narrow minds. "we is the bestest" = sure phuck head - you is the greatest 😉
By white you mean German? Or Britain? American? Irish, Iceland, Australian, Russian, Swedish, Norwegian, Hungarian, Belgian, French, or Czech? Oh wait... Those are nationalities... Which means USA is not, and never has been a "White" country because "white" is an exaggerated adjective of a person's skin color. So if you have a nationalty problem, remember, that race has nothing to do with it, especially America.
0.46 the 'astronaut' jumps down, as the 'ladder' has been made too short. We all jump down onto foreign surfaces when on serious missions to moons. Sure buddy. We don't move carefully and prefer to just hope the surface is smooth not soft or uneven so can risk jumping so that we look 'brave' when the 'eagle' has landed. Such a load of crock! 2023 01 19 06:51
Look at photos of the LM. He jumped down onto the LM footbed, not onto the lunar surface. Also he was jumping in 1/6th gravity, so there would be have been little impact. They rehearsed this 100s of times of earth, nothing was spontaneous or careless
😎🤘👍🌟☮️❤️🔥🌐🫡🇺🇸✨️🚀 awesome! Preserve all cultures, ways of doing, expressing, learning, living & all walks of life. #WorldMagicMusicMakers #Maker #Independent #MusicLoversBlockchain it's more than music. Much more. Congrats to all connected. #SpreadTruth #Love be #Grateful #Joyful #Peaceful 😊 #NASA
Tonight it will be 40 years from this moment. Thanks for posting. Guys, just feel sorry for the folks who believe this was a hoax. Some of them will have a chance to change their minds over time.
Sadly today there is only a minority of people who believe this was real.
@@kennethkeen4988 No. There are millions that believe. They just all don't feel the need to come onto TH-cam to argue with in-bred, attention-seeking trolls .
hi im from the future
@@kennethkeen4988 No. 95%+ believe it is real.
Yes clearly a hoax to say they landed on the moon.
Few believe 'the moon landing' today as no evidence has been produced except nasty films of 'rockets' popping off the surface made by 'radio-controlled' remote (super high power transmission) cameras stationed on the moon, which despite the transmission time lag managed to send images showing how they tracked the 'ascent' all the way to the mother ship. Awesome eh?
2023 01 19 05:26
Wow! perfect video and audio in realtime from 230,000 miles away In 1969, here it is 50 years later and we can't even get constant cell phone service coverage when talking to someone 20 miles away.. Communications were so much better back then. Boy I can't wait , another 30 years we"'ll be using a telegraph.
george vila ..yeah.. Not for the better apparently.
The average daytime temperature of the moon is 224.6 degrees Fahrenheit (107° C). Keep in mind that water boils at 212 degrees Fahrenheit (100° C). The average temperature of the far/dark side of the moon is -243.4 degrees Fahrenheit (-153° C). Water freezes at 32 degrees Fahrenheit. Such an obvious lie. Really? They can't even keep A/C working properly in our automobiles! LMAO
@@Tmhen NO ONE, let me repeat "NO ONE" on earth uses the antiquated system of measure TEMPERATURE , except "Americans".
Now why it is they cling to this forgotten method of expressing temperature is simply due to the FACT that Americans are to be KEPT BLIND AND DUMB, regarding ANYTHING SCIENTIFIC, because if they were to understand SCIENCE they would very quickly come to the conclusion that they have been CONNED by an establishment, which keeps them fed with nonsense to this very day. But dream on - as George CARLIN said ""The American dream" - you have to be asleep to believe it" !
@@Tmhen moon landing wasnt faked. this is billion dollar equipment not a few thousand dollar equipment.
They filmed this in a New Mexico desert, we haven’t been to the moon
I do remember watching these Apollo missions in my 1st and 2nd grade classrooms. The good ole days!
As someone who actually watched the landings in real time (I am very jealous) How do you feel about all the conspiracy theorists nowadays?
@slobodan knezevic That's great, conspiracy theorist. Put your tin foil hat back on
Uhh, he never said he watched them live.
Shyam Santhanam Your exactly right.
I'm in 8th grade watching them...
''That's one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind.''
😂
One small step for Kubrick.
why is the astronaut transparent while climbing down the ladder? there are two black lines through his leg at 0:45
+Francesco Rizzo (Soft Musix) pay close attention to prior to 0:45 starting at 0:31 seconds.. he is transparent there too..I searched the comments to see if anyone else noticed that as well!
+Francesco Rizzo (Soft Musix) Good observation friend the reason that is well because the camera they used during the filming of the landing is called a Video camera tube(vidicon tube) which holds an image for seconds after and gives off a transparent look.
Nashfan13fl
got it
Larry Knight
Sadly @@nickyn4076 is right. Bluntly speaking, it was all a fake but many people believed the film at the time. It was not clearly explained that this was a PR necessity at the time.
1. the flag is waving because he had to twist the two pieces of the pole together.
2. if the were filming this in a CLOSED filming studio how could there be wind to make the flag wave.
"if"
@@kennethkeen4988 what about it
Exhaust from the ship landing created the force for the flag to wave.
@@andrewkozintsev6823 Who said that the studio had all the doors closed? Who said that some scenes were not to be filmed outside? Who believes this crap from nasa, when they don't have the evidence?
This is just an amusing stunt pulled off risking no lives, costing very little money and achieving lots of public respect "if it is believed", but unfortunately - people across the globe are educated and don't work with fahrenheits and horses and feet and pounds and yanky wanky trash movies that could be outdone by a ten year old with a half decent Macbook and two days of free time from TV!
th-cam.com/video/We1HqGQRXkE/w-d-xo.html. This explains it all.
Amazing footage, btw who was the camera man for the first 10 seconds of the video before it stopped moving?
Stanley Kubrick
It was operated remotely
so the flag is not waving. Why are there so many theories that says its fake cuz the flag is waving, its clearly not
I'm one of those conspiracy nuts who believes we DID land on the moon!
Aw I'm hurt
I think the flag is moving
No rocket sounds when they were landing... Are you serious?
@@고기명-v1r I think you should Google why and educate yourself, before you do anymore 'thinking.'
@@NamaSika
There you go.
Why ???
Here for the 50th anniversary of the Moon Landing!
We haven’t been to the moon
& 54 years of indoctrination
If they landed on the moon surface! Which is not, how on earth they managed to come back to earth?!!
If they went in 1969 why they didn’t manage to get back to the moon again after all these years and advanced technology.?
My younger brother was born about 2 hours after they stepped foot on the moon Happy B-Day!!
This is so cool
(its awesome)
Could you imagine being in such a place. So surreal
what, you mean in a tv studio duping the whole world?
@@nachtundnebel3175 If I had a powerful enough telescope, I could literally show you where they landed and you would be able to see the lunar module
@@hypefogg9790 Weird how Neil is so transparent. I can see right through him the whole time almost as good as I can see through this "moon landing" nonsense.
@@hypefogg9790NASA said the same thing
@@hypefogg9790😂
Who filmed this?
All automated from Houston - NASA are real experts in manipulation.
Next-generation cameras provided by Stanley Kubrick were installed on the lander and there were a few handhelds for photos. The footage was automatically taken The camera was retrieved before returning to earth.
@@boydrobertson2362 "retrieved", and sent by fax or email to Denver.
Why can we see through Neil? What kind of wizardry is this?
American Horor Story bought me here
that video was awsome
gee whizz, it was a fake? But why?
amazing
it never happened, it was all produced in a studio basement!
@@nachtundnebel3175 - Highschool Dropout
my favorite
You "see it in his eyes"? Yeah. That's solid science.
There could be many reasons why Neil Armstrong had issues with being a "people person." But, the lack of eye contact HAD to be because he was lying about walking on the Moon... The conspiracy theories are entertaining, if nothing else.
conspiracy theorists will believe the moon landing was fake, but think that there is a child slave colony on mars lol.
b r u h
@george vila b r u h
@Du Zau b r u h
@Du Zau what, so you think he's a ghost? That happens plenty of times with cameras that are older or worse in quality
@Du Zau this was on a completely different terrestrial body, in 1969.
Why can you see through the astronaut on the ladder?
fake graphics were bad at the time... .
Where?
@@hypefogg9790 dream on Foggy. Some day it will all be true.
@@hypefogg9790 You can see the horizon line right through his knee as his leg dangles right before he jumps onto the moon.
@@hypefogg9790 in fact you can see that thick black horizon line through the whole entire astronaut
the only strange thing it's that nobody have been to the moon since 1972... i mean come on with all the new technology that we have today
No one would believe it to be possible except some old Americans, hanging on to their one claim to fame.
We've been to the Moon multiple times. There's no need to spend all that money to do it again. The next destination is Mars.
Why go back? Money is now spent making wars and defense contractor's and politicians rich. There is no money for them to make going back to the Moon.
@@vincef.5378 bro i love you
NASA said they don't have the required technology anymore.
Happy Anniversary!!!
They just cancelled a over budget Moon rover in 2024, but in 1969 in just 10 years we had people walking on the moon live on tv.
Ha ha, you guys are always good for a laugh.
Best is when Americans are trying to appear serious, and then talk about 'a foot and six eights of an inch', just 'awesome' that 330 million suckers can be persuaded to watch this crap!
Congrats NASA, on the landing anniversary on this day.
Where'd you come up with that? The radiation you speak of is in the Van Allen radiation belts above earth's atmosphere. The moon is about 10x higher than that. The amount of ionizing radiation on the Moon's surface is not excessive and would not fog film. Heat on the daytime moon surface would have been a bigger problem, except for no atmosphere, so the heat is not transferred to the film unless the camera is in direct physical contact with the lunar surface, which it never was.
Sunshine without atmosphere creates a temperature of 150˚C on any surface such as a camera, but Mr Harris thinks that 150˚C would not fry his skin nor a celluloid film, he is exceptional - an American education. Whao.....
Americans are clearly lost using their 'feet' and 'pounds' and 'Fahrenheits' and "horsepowers' etc Give them a break, decimal is the next stage they will have to deal with if they are to reach the rest of us in the 21st century. Not a chance.
@@kennethkeen4988 Yeah and the Van Allen Belt is what protects us on earth from that very radiation from the sun yet astronauts walk in granny stitched space suits exposed to solar radiation.
@@Mr2TIMOTHY4V2 You know that they would've been in a space shuttle designed to handle radiation right?
@@hypefogg9790 What space shuttle? We are talking about the first so-called trip to the moon. There was no space shuttle with radiation tiles. The space shuttle travels in space it does NOT go to OUTER space. Michio Kaku tells you HIMSELF they have no OUTER SPACE TRAVEL ABILITY. So they NEVER went to the moon (aka outer space)
Michio Kaku Tells Us We HAve No Outer Space Travel Ability th-cam.com/video/G3cNBXXsVrE/w-d-xo.html
Catch a wake up NASA in Hebrew sounds the same as "deception"
could anybody please explain me how is it possible that without atmosphere - where gravity acceleration should apply equally to objects of any size and mass - sand from the astronauts' boots falls back on the ground faster than the astronauts themselves? ...I also don't understand where the fill-light is coming from since the astronauts are standing in the shadow of the Sun? ....and what are those 3 light sources reflecting on the helmets? thank you!
Also where is the lunar lander rocket blast ? If a landing craft were to land on the moon with all that fine dust and rocks you should have one heck of a blown out crater.
Another thing "Where are tall the stars"? We don't see stars while standing on the moon. There is no atmosphere to block them out.
The whole thing stinks of one massive cover-up.
You know what NASA stands for.....
Never
A
Straight
Answer
+D. Hansel - All landing Crafts start the landing burn several meter above the ground, the thruster force would was not able to make a significant impact. And all stars are there, we just can't see it due to the exposure. On the Moon, due to no shadow from mountans or light filtering by a atmosphere the whole Surface is basically a huge lightbulb, the reason the astronauts can see is because they have a secondary visor on their helmets that is tinted (like sunglasses) and for us to not see a huge White glow throught the recording the exposure limit was increased. Basically the video is a few times darker than what it is on the Moon, this covered up all the stars - if you increase the exposure limit on a normal pcicture from the Moon landing the stars return but the Moon and the Astronauts are covered in a Bright light. You know what Google is meant for?Toallowidiotslikeyoutoquicklyfind this information, if you only had looked thorougly.
1. You're an idiot. Try Google. Try learning. Jesus! The Moon is a fucking ROCK! WHY would there be a crater? You're expecting 'top soil' to be blown away? It's.. ROCK! Blow out crater... moron! Another thing... where are all the stars? DUMMY! WATCH a Space Shuttle EVA (walk)... guess what... NO STARS! In that case light reflected from the Earth washes out (over-exposes) the star fields... they wash out. On the Moon... the light reflecting up from the Moon's surface, from the Sun and reflected light from the Lunar Lander WASH OUT the star fields. Take a fucking photography course. What stinks of a cover-up is your complete ignorance of anything you talk about. Go read a book, go play in traffic... make yourself useful.
And dipshit... before you go on about the waving flag on the Moon (so there had to be wind, so they had to be in a studio)... the flag along the top was hung by a ROD... and the bottom of the flag was weighted. The waving was KINETIC ENERGY from the Astronauts having to FORCE the pole into the Moon (it's ROCK, remember?) and it 'waved in the wind' for a while. Do you think (rhetorical... of course you don't) that if they wanted to FAKE the Moon landing they would have intentionally forgot to put up star lights in the sky? Do you think they'd be blowing a flag around? Oh... and there are SEVERAL light sources on the Moon (in case you ask about shadows going in different directions). There's the SUN, the EARTH and reflections of light from the Lunar Lander. Go... run your car in the garage or something. After 50 years with the internet and the sum of human knowledge at your fingertips, if you're too fucking lazy to learn anything... you best go eat a bullet.
I bet you will vote for Hildabeast too :-)
stop asking questions guys, it's anti semantics!!!
why is that astronaut transparent? begin at 31 sec of the video: th-cam.com/video/hxPbnFc7iU8/w-d-xo.html
Crazy
Need answer r
Do they have 60 hz to 120 hz free change
Camera's back then weren't the greatest
@@hypefogg9790 Fantastic scientific explanation. 🤣
Still the most metal thing humans have ever done.
Holy cow.. you can see through the space suit and see the background!
It’s called «moon phenomenon”
oi
After a half century why no one go to moon after them why even now world have such a technology
No reason too
Just send a rover no reason to risk Human lives
@@hypefogg9790 There's no risk, not these days. We have computers - technology and dedication - something that they didn't have in the 1960s.
They don't even have a rover - yanks are lost and can't even offer a defence to why they are the biggest losers on the planet.
@@kennethkeen1234 Your bias is clear.
@@kennethkeen1234 I am guessing you might be Serbian. You salty, I am sorry baby boy? I am sorry that we effortlessly destroyed your pathetic asses to stop your genocide. Oh, not Serbian. Huh, you should be grateful, y'all would be freezing to death without our LNG. Can my big strong boy say thank you?
@@boydrobertson2362 Save your country from obliteration boyd, forget about a 'moon landing' the 31 trillion dollars are to be repaid. PAY UP NOW!!!!
2023 01 19 06:27
It's because they're moving it. just because it's in a vacuum doesn't mean the flag will stay perfectly stiff.
💓❤️💓❤️💓 NASA
We wanted a good place to stage it, so we went on location.
Who held the camera? If it's a tripod, who brought it there?
um... they probably brought the camera with them in the rocket. If it was not a tripod, another astronaut was probably holding the camera.
Probably either the person who was still on the shuttle or Buzz Aldrin
this was 1969, you pile of dehydrated meat particles.
@@Tired_Coffee But that would mean Neil Armstrong was not the first on the moon, because the camera man was there before him.
@@raketexyz I see your point, but the camera could have started to record after Armstrong set foot on the Moon.
I remember it well...I believe...
How long before the astronauts did the production crew arrive?? this is hilarious..
There were cameras on the Lunar Module
"the simplest explanation is usually the best one."
@@hypefogg9790 You mean the moon rocket? The rocket that took off from the moon? Yeah, jump in boys - we're going to earth in 20 seconds! Ha ha ha.
2020
Such a low quality fake. You can see horizon right thru the body
what a troll!
dang humanity wild
Im here cause i wanna know why there was two minutes of radio silence
See all the answers you got?.........
2023 01 19 06:00
Why is there wind on the moon?
@@poopa2319 indicates a FORCE in one direction which continues to operate unless acted upon by another FORCE!
why aren't there any stars in the background EH
There isn't any atmosphere to block the light from the sun and earth
Same reason why you don't see many stars in well lit cities
@@hypefogg9790 you see stars on a sunny day ? what did you have for lunch today ?
@@realmoonknight No. You can't see stars at any time in cities because of light pollution. The light of street lights, house lights, car headlights, etc, bounce off the ground, and into the air. These light waves overpower the light of stars.
You can't see stars on the moon because there is 100% reflection of light waves from the sun off the moon surface. The ultimate source of light. These far outpower the starlight.
You can see stars during the day, but it is extremely difficult. The difference is that the atmosphere blocks most of the suns light before it reflects off of the earths surface, not allowing an overpowering of similar degrees.
Which side did you guys land on anyway?
what is that like a white dot right side of the video screen?
Try Google.
It's a star lol
Wow. It's really windy on the moon!
Even if you're joking. To those that (still may) not know... the flag along
the top was hung by a ROD... and the bottom of the flag was weighted.
The waving was KINETIC ENERGY from the Astronauts having to FORCE the
pole into the Moon (it's ROCK, remember?) and it 'waved in the wind' for
a while. Try Google... instead of playing your video games doubting accomplishments that are way beyond you awaiting the release of a new iPhone. Moron.
Sure @@vincef.5378 you know what happened, the wind was magnetic. FORCING a pole into ROCK is what Americans try. The cameraman who was there for the arrival was not named, was he later paid at all?
@@kennethkeen4988 there’s no cameraman you nut job there’s a camera that came out of the side of the lunar lander to film neils first steps. Quick google search away
@@jjonahjameson8934 Sorry, but everything I found looked like some teenagers had been given a large mechano set and were told it could be painted grey when finished, but they only had green paint in the end. All the mechanical parts perform absolutely no function, except to fool the viewer into thinking this was a technically advanced ding dong. How the metal parts fit together! It really looks like they could on ly buy the parts in a cheap extinct DIY outlet in Colerado and thought no one would notice! Just cheap and shoddy. 2021 01 22 20:29
Pretty good phone reception from 200,000 plus miles away in 1969. I want to see more of this footage? Why only two minutes of incredible history of landing on the moon? My uncles wedding was like 9 hours plus worth of footage. But I hate it when Nasa only shot a few minutes of video. sad.
They shot a lot of video. This is a montage. I remember watching the landing and every second of them on TV (yes, I'm old). There are literally hours of footage. You could find out more by a simple google search, but I'm sure you're happy in your ignorance.
@@bbofun is twisted from day one. NASA don't make the "hours of footage" available - since they managed to "lose" the originals and no one made a copy - typical YANKY conn-men tricks like a travelling salesman selling snake oil!
why does the flag have a reflection under the ship ?
Why no communication lag?
Because its fake
There is a communication lag of around 2-3 seconds.
@@boydrobertson2362 2 or 3 or more or less or maybe or not. Sure 'boyd' defends his right to keep his illusion strong.
@@kennethkeen1234 Speed of light determines the exact amount. If you don't believe in basic science, you are probably a part of the population that would be better of darwined of the face of earth.
Where is all the space stuff? Why is it all black?
the sky? they had to decrease the bright because the sun was too strong cuz no atmosphere, but it happened to "delete" the stars
also, the camera is old
Is this the restored footage that Lowry did?
who did record the video then?
External camera; internal mic
They had attached a camera onto a moving robotic arm that extended Before Neil A. existed.
@@random3857 dreams -the American dream. You have to be asleep to appreciate it.
The robot was in the cabin, another on the outer leg and a third in the rocks as the spaceship took off for earth, sure buddy, they stopped making those robots as they were often mistaken for humans and that was not cool.
Why nobody since 1969 - 7X go again on the Moon ?
Because the public got bored with it. And because there was no pressing scientific reason to.
It would be too difficult to try to fool people in this day and age. People are no longer as gullible as then and are all keen to spot all the signals of fakery going on. It would really have to happen and NASA explains that today it is impossible as they no longer have the technical ability.
Why go back? Money is now spent making wars and defense contractor's and politicians rich. There is no money for them to make going back to the Moon.
from 1:30
0:36 min.: Atronauts get transparent when they are on the moon.
Yep.. isn't it weird?
It’s this little known thing called a crappy camera
Nasa are not able to explain so don't embarrass the poor men - they are all retired and tired of trying to explain why they were paid so much to tell lies.
@@jjonahjameson8934 Made in the great usa no doubt - lets you do all sorts of tricks.
It's a fake hoax
its mounted on one of the moonlanders arms
sure. one of many.
Congratulations for the WHOLE humanity. We're growing up fast, and the space will be our last frontier. that God help us on it.
We did.
We didn't.
It's incredible how the NASA was the first to rickroll the mankind
How did the telephones and CB radios communicate with earth? Have you ever lost signal while you were on planet earth?
massive radio dishes besides since space is empty there is nothing to interfere with the signal
Never, American phones work everywhere!
@@kennethkeen1234 T-mobile in Nebraska: DO I LOOK LIKE I EXIST TO YOU?
@@big4330 And that could handle 230,000 miles away in realtime 720p high-quality refresh, video, and sound FROM 1969. Where would the radio dishes connect. If we had that kind of technology, we could always call with perfect, smooth, crisp video calling and sound.
@@kennethkeen1234Thats not true lol.
Nobody moonwalks like Jacko.
Where is his famous line?
does anyone know the mirroring on the helmet?
Can anyone please respond ? why is he transparent ?
It's due to the type of video camera they used- it holds onto images, so there's brief moments of "overlap."
Try Google.
@@bbofun And if you believe this then you'll believe ANYTHING!
@@kennethkeen1234 MP4 files do the exact same thing to reduce data usage. I presume NASA wanted to make the signal to earth as data efficient as possible. It sometimes leads to distortion/artefacts on MP4s, so it's not surprising when it lead to the same thing here.
My only concern is that right before he jumps off latter you can see the edge or horizon of the moon through his leg/knee and when he jumps the line/edge/horizon goes through his body almost like it was filmed in front of green screen like a news/weather screen 😂
Such a low quality fake thing
why the flag moves when in the moon has no air
The US flag unfurled on the Moon was a specially crafted banner designed to stand upright in the low gravity lunar environment.
One pole shaft was firmly planted into the ground and held the flag upright.
Another pole extended perpendicularly from the top and made sure the flag was fully extended and stretched out. :)
ITS HARDENED CLOTH. there should be some gravity based on their pseudoscience.
He's still adjusting it lol
this is fake, where is the camera man?
Somebody watching??☔☔☔
Nasa slightly missed 1st of April
Why is the flag waving?
***** Because they were twisting it back and forth to get it to stay in the ground and since there's no air resistance in space it takes longer than normal for the flag to stop moving from the twisting motion
***** because the astronaut was moving its stick. there is no air on the moon so the flag has to overcome less resistance. "Myth busters" made an experiment about it.
The flagpole has a rod at the top, holding the flag straight out. When the astronauts twist and move the flagpole, they're moving the rod relative to the flag and the flag will lag behind the rod, even without an atmosphere.
And if you believe @@Crlarl' limp explanation you can also buy a suicide suit in ebay for $20
@@veemoose GOOGLE why if you really want an answer. It's been explained for 50 YEARS.
Neil Armstrong
Buzz Aldrin
Michael Jackson
My son I will name "Buzz" because I am out of my mind on drugs and don't care at all. You can't make this stuff up!
We all want our money back.
space's hall of fame!
And still believe. Moving on flat earthers.
the astronaut looks like a ghost and it sounds like theres air but there isnt
The "Air" you hear are Radio Background Noises
first comment in three years!
Congratulations. You should set higher goals for yourself.
Walt Disney < NASA
Walt wins!
Wow look at that moon landing that never happened so cool everybody say wowwww
1:10the suit looks so curious it hilarious
I feel sorry most of you do't believe in science. I do believe!
One does not "believe" science unless they are living in a brain washed cult. The Bible understands the scientific method more than you: "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good."
@@sumbodyshero science is what bring us closer to gods, don't be stupid and start the science vs religion debate
The problem is - scientists, do NOT work with NASA - no scientist on earth works with fahrenheit, no scientist uses "inches" to describe distance, no scientist uses "horses" to indicate power. In fact NOTHING that NASA claims has any basis in scientific fact.
Sorry to be so up front with my statement.
It's a hollywood set !
Can't wait for you to post your proof. Looking forward to it. Thx. in advance.
@@vincef.5378 th-cam.com/video/Ka98bnP97Ew/w-d-xo.html , All this is known to intimidate the Soviet Union
or there is an AutoFocus on the camera ... ;)
Ask Google.
I want to moonwalk(michael jacson moonwalk - not that actually boncing thing) on the moon... SOOOOOO bad!!!!
you know when ever traveling to the moon becomes commen that joke's gonna be soo outdated and over done.. but imagine how funny it is the first time anybody does that...
ps. the moon landing was technologically too soon. any agree?
It's been so long that we'll need archaeologist to come along on the next lunar landing mission... #MoonwalksInMyLifetime (damn if anything that is worth living for!) Go Nasa! :)
Pas si longtemps que cela car il y a eu 6 alunissages, avec des humains à bord, depuis Apollon 11 🤔
Ayo s 2022 soon
omg how
Neil Armstrong
*Fakeeee*
2 different angles of shadows... means 2 different light sources.. craft in shadows.. but astronaunts in light .. doesnt work that way...
Plenty of light sources on the Moon. Only a complete idiot couldn't figure that out. 1. The Sun. 2. The Earth. 3. Light from the Moon surface (60% glass). 4. from all the angles bouncing off the Lunar Lander. School is out. You're welcome. Try Google next time.
@@vincef.5378 YESSSIRRER SHUT THESE IDIOTS DOWNNNN
I know its hard to figure out, But Earth has a atmosphere unlike the moon
And atmospheres tend to make light a little weird
So light principles on earth don't really matter on the Moon
@@hypefogg9790 such a bullshitter - zero science - all just bullshit. "the principles of light" do not apply on the moon.
Sure buddy - go back to your Thunderbird Show.
I guess space makes you fade away cause i clearly see the backround of the "moon" throught the actornaut Neil Armstrong in 0:33
This big fake
hahah I love how people from european countries say that the moon landings are fake because they are so jealous that there shitty countries have never landed on the moon ^_^ I'm proud to be american !!
We love people like you in Europe. It rescues us from making jokes about others who are simply less fortunate. You had the chance and squandered it, so we laugh at your arrogance.
" proud to be american"
@@kennethkeen4988 Says the Countries who were losing in ww2 and we had to save your asses
And the wanker hadn't even the sense to write in English as Americans just can't manage to get their grammar right - no, that would be too much for their little narrow minds. "we is the bestest" = sure phuck head - you is the greatest 😉
By white you mean German? Or Britain? American? Irish, Iceland, Australian, Russian, Swedish, Norwegian, Hungarian, Belgian, French, or Czech? Oh wait... Those are nationalities... Which means USA is not, and never has been a "White" country because "white" is an exaggerated adjective of a person's skin color. So if you have a nationalty problem, remember, that race has nothing to do with it, especially America.
0.46 the 'astronaut' jumps down, as the 'ladder' has been made too short. We all jump down onto foreign surfaces when on serious missions to moons. Sure buddy. We don't move carefully and prefer to just hope the surface is smooth not soft or uneven so can risk jumping so that we look 'brave' when the 'eagle' has landed. Such a load of crock!
2023 01 19 06:51
Look at photos of the LM. He jumped down onto the LM footbed, not onto the lunar surface. Also he was jumping in 1/6th gravity, so there would be have been little impact. They rehearsed this 100s of times of earth, nothing was spontaneous or careless
😎🤘👍🌟☮️❤️🔥🌐🫡🇺🇸✨️🚀 awesome! Preserve all cultures, ways of doing, expressing, learning, living & all walks of life. #WorldMagicMusicMakers #Maker #Independent #MusicLoversBlockchain it's more than music. Much more. Congrats to all connected. #SpreadTruth #Love be #Grateful #Joyful #Peaceful 😊 #NASA