Did A CSI Commit The Perfect Murder
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 ต.ค. 2024
- On tonight's episode of Prime Crime, a private investigator named Taylor Wright suddenly goes missing. Authorities have several different theories, persons of interest in mind, and even considered whether Wright disappeared on her own. Yet, it's the police interviews of Wright's friend, crime scene technician, Ashley McArthur, that changes the whole game. As we weigh how strong the evidence is against the government's main suspect, we also hear from the prosecutor and defense attorney in this case.
#TaylorWright AshleyMcArthur #PrimeCrime
HOST: #JesseWeber @JesseCordWeber
You may already have access to the Law&Crime Network! Find out here: lawandcrime.co...
No access? That’s okay! Subscribe direct to Law&Crime here: lawandcrime.co...
Watch Us Live On Peacock Daily Free: www.peacocktv....
Click on Channels & Scroll Down to Law & Crime Network
I always shake my head when someone says, " They didn't look like a person that would murder someone " . So, what does a murderer look like? 😒
Like your friendly neighbors.
John Wayne Casey- appeared to be a model citizen
Ted Bundy- Law student & loving boyfriend
Susan Smith - killed her kids
B. T. K. - had a family lived a life that appeared mostly normal.
Jasmiyah and Tasmiyah Whitehead- twin teenagers that killed their mother .
Robert Thompson and Jon Venables-
10 year old boys they kidnapped & killed a 3 year old boy.
It's terrifying that it's impossible to know who could be a killer.
There's absolutely no way to know
Face tats
@Gregor Samsa ...kinda missing the point. A murderer can look like anyone.
@@cctomcat321
I know. It was just a joke
Charming and scheming like Ted Bundy Lol. One would have never known! Murders have no face!
Wow. Her boyfriend was quick to say he doesn't trust her at all. I don't get people. If thats the way you feel about this person, then why is she still your girlfriend. I'd rather be by myself than be with someone I don't trust. Weird.
Probably had great "head game"
Good kitty
Pathetic
Open relationship/marriage. McArthur was married, so the boyfriend is her side piece. 🙄 He was merely enjoying all the gifts and freebies she was giving him.
Amazing head is the only answer.
Can you imagine your best friend betraying you like this. The last moments must have been horrifying.
Yes she is a real betrayal
she probably ran off to south america
I don’t think she thought much, she was shot in the head.
@@Eclipse1369 yeah but we have no idea what that conversation was like on their ride to the farm when she was still alive.
@@priceandpride You are not in the least bit funny. Go watch cartoons.
She could have just said " i spent it. Im sorry. I will pay you back get another job dont report me. " even if she had to go to jail for larceny or robbery she would have had so many less years! People are so dumb. Just be honest. We all suck and make mistakes but dont kill people.
This is my favorite comment. It wouldn’t have KILLED her to have to swallow her pride and admit that she didn’t have the money. I don’t think she could even have gone to jail, because the money was a loan. My mom lent someone her car once, who didn’t bring it back, and the police said if she allowed him to use it, there was nothing they could do. I called him a bunch of times, bluffing about how much trouble he could be in and he brought it back after like 4 days. But if he hadn’t, nothing would have happened because he could just say that she gave it to him and it would be his word against hers. No one could have actually made McArthur pay it back. If the loan agreement was in writing, there may have been a case in small claims court, but they don’t jail you for noncompliance. You can’t squeeze money out of a rock. You’d think she would have known that, with any career involved in the CJS. Did she not want to lose face with her friends that bad? Or did she hate her? Because her motive was useless. She ended a life, for nothing. She wouldn’t have been in trouble, but she’s in trouble now! Your moral argument is far stronger than any stupidity argument, though. We have to be able to love and forgive ourselves to avoid taking out our insecurities and self-hate on someone else.
@@heidiho5179 so true. Exactly why Jesus gave us love your neighbor as you love yourselves as the second commandment and He also says to forgive others and do good to those who hurt you and pray for your enemies..it is for spiritual reasons but also for emotional and peaceful reasons. So many of these crimes are out of unforgiveness or jealousy.since i gave my life to Jesus Christ years ago He healed so much in me that i dont feel overwhelming emotions like i used to that are negative like jealousy and never hate. It is so freeing to actually feel love for people even when they hurt you. God is amazing!! I think she needed some Jesus! ❤
@@elsablue3646 It really is freeing to know that you’re not alone and, no matter what you did wrong, even if everyone you know on earth hates you, you are still loved. I do have mercy, even for people like this woman, because without faith, the world is a scary place. Blessings to you!
Exactly, I don't get it either, the worst would have been, you go to court and you pay the money back, if you can't you go bankrupt and after 7 years it's over, no killing no jail time. 🤔🤷🏽♂️
A humans Killer Instinct can't be stopped.
It's only a perfect murder if you are never even suspected of it.
Well, some people are auto-suspects. You can’t always avoid it
Ain't it lol.
That is so true! How often you hear a crime is a perfect murder during a trial!
it's a perfect murder if you murder someone and never face consequences for it. most people wind up being suspects even for a short time based solely on their adjacency to the victim, regardless of their innocence.
Yeah, this was the furthest thing from the perfect murder. There was documentation of a motive (the bank statements), and she let herself be seen with Taylor right before Taylor "disappeared."
Brings to mind two things I was taught: 1-people are rarely who they appear to be, and never who you want them to be. And 2-only the people you trust can betray you.
That’s exactly why I don’t trust anyone!
Good points 🤔
@@catherinesyme901 0
Well said
The most important one for me was watch a person's actions, not their words.
This is disgusting. She killed her FRIEND for a lousy $34k. You can’t put a dollar amount on a life. It’s priceless! Like, you really can’t trust anyone or anything but The Most High. This is absolutely DISGUSTING!
The most high😂😂😂
I heard on another coverage of this case it was over 100k total.... but you're right this chick was only holding 34k
Shortly before she went missing, Wright took $100,000 out of her and her ex-husband’s joint bank account. When she got the money, she ended up splitting it and giving it to some different friends to hold for her until she needed it. One of the friends Wright gave part of the money to was a woman by the name of Ashley McArthur,
sounds worth it to me
@@wazaagbreak-head6039 Walk a mile in Ashley's shoes now :)
A dead friend & life in prison for only 34K . Not worth it
Dude... she was a terrible csi if she didn't know about cell phones, bank records and leaving a body of a person you murdered, on your own property...
👍🏾
Actually, CSIs never get involved with bank records, cell phone tracking, and stuff like that. CSIs do the crime scene and they're done. Other than depositing the body on land her family owned, she did a pretty good job of not connecting herself physically to the murder -- which is what CSIs are looking for, physical evidence.
@@LeeBv9983 but they would know about it all tho. That makes no sense. Clearly she was a very stupid person.
@@chrissymeri4957 Nope. CSIs collect evidence at the scene and then give it to the crime lab. The lab does the testing and writes the report to the detectives. A CSI may see the detective at the crime scene, but that's it. The TV portrayals of CSIs are just fiction to create drama.
I don’t think she worked much
Apparently she didn’t know how cellphone towers could be used to track her movements so much for a CSI. FDLE should look at the cases she worked on for any potential miscarriages of justice.
A CSI does the crime scene only, police / FBI investigators do the actual investigation as a whole. They would get evidence from a CSI to build their case. But yes, for a CSI she doesn't seem to even have the scene 100% fool proof, she may have even inadvertently put a target on her if the CSI on this case had said, "this crime scene seems too perfect, checks all the boxes on what I'm looking for is missing here".
CSI's are civiliian's and NOT Police
No you’re wrong. ALL CSI’s are not civilians. It depends on the department actually
@@kentmaggio2581 I am not wrong. Go do some real research
@@gavincrouch if you work in law enforcement, you should know the basics of investigations. If you're CSI, you definitely should know what police look for, because you're the one to deliver that to them. There's no excuse for a CSI not to know that police track suspects via cellphone towers. Most civilians know that
as soon as this video states that ashley got taylor's money, I knew ashley had something to do with taylor's disappearance
Same.
Right
She’s a CSI and yet didn’t know about the info that could be found on her phone, so she blithely hands it over to detectives? What a dummy.
When people have to keep up with so many lies and are hide so much they often overlook some obvious evidence that can take them down. Any half decent criminal would account for not using a personal phone or even having it with them. She knows the forensic evidence that leads to arrests and interrogation tactics so well she was probably confident/cocky walking into that room. Right until the detective asked for the phone records, how can she go from fully cooperating to not allowing fellow law enforcement access to her phone. That would b a huge red flag. People should never talked without legal counsel but I’m sure idiots who murder she do.
*@elstungunn* - it’s always so easy to figure things out when they’re figured out for us, right??? Many people who’ve never murdered anyone seem to have a hard time understanding how much fear, adrenaline, maybe lack of sleep, definitely terror of mixing up her lies while being interrogated by police....all of these factors make guilty people prone to making mistakes. There can be many points during a murder investigation when the murderer is being questioned and has presented herself as an innocent party....the major points in this case were McArthur’s bank records and her cell phone records, as well as Taylor’s.....where, if she refused to give detectives her phone on the spot, she would look guilty, and if she DID turn the phone over, all she could hope for was that the detectives might not scrutinize the records too closely, or that they might not figure out what she was doing. If you watched the trial, you’ll remember how crazy-making it was listening to the asst prosecutor as she went through those records point by point by confusion point, bc they were extremely complicated. The assistant prosecutor actually apologized for this testimony during her closing argument. Anyway, it may have seemed easy for you to figure out, but you totally have the benefit of hindsight.
@@voraciousreader3341 We’ll have to agree to disagree. This was a carefully planned murder and she managed to get rid of a lot of other forensic evidence, right? If she was a regular citizen not aware of investigative techniques, I might agree with you. However, she was a Crime Scene Investigator familiar (I would hope/think) of forensic evidence collection protocol which includes cell phones. I would assume part of her training would include that cell phones found at the scene of a crime are to be collected not only for organic evidence: i.e. prints and fluids, but also digital information to track where that cell phone has been during the period in question.
No, I did not watch the trial; only this upload. And no, I’ve never had enough sympathy for murderers to wonder if they were terrified, not sleeping well, fearful of police during or after they murdered. But history is full of cold-blooded murderers who felt none of that. I wouldn’t be surprised if this wasn’t her only crime as she seemed to so readily and easily steal from “her friend.” That’s very cold-blooded, in my opinion.
Good for people to know: If detectives bring you in for questioning, you need to get a lawyer and not talk to the police. Forget what other people might think. CLUE: if detectives ask you to “come downtown to answer some quick questions,” that is a HUGE RED FLAG. And if they ask to have your phone for “forensic examination,” do not give them permission and make them get a warrant. That is your right, who cares what they might think because guess what: if you are called in not only once, but twice “for detectives to clarify a couple of things,” you are in their crosshairs and they are closing in.
So no, this is not a case of “20/20 Hindsight,” or “armchair quarterbacking” or whatever you are suggesting. It is very basic knowledge.
@@elstongunn4277 Crime-scene investigators aren't detectives. I could be wrong, but I think McCarthy was a technician. There's a lot more involved in detective work than just the evidence collected at the scene.
If she did it, which seems likely, she saw the phone records as part of her plan, including texting from the victim's phone. It's entirely possible that a CSI would overlook the fact that the victim's phone would ping off a cell tower if it weren't in use. It's an easy thing to overlook. Maybe she thought she turned it off. Maybe she forgot to turn it off. Maybe it didn't occur to her that leaving it on would leave a footprint.
When you're trying to commit a perfect crime, there's any number of ways you can get tripped up. I imagine you probably can't possibly foresee all the different ways you might be exposed. Murder for money or revenge is pretty hard to cover up. Serial killers who kill strangers are the toughest to track down, because there's no clear connection between victim and murderer.
I'd keep in mind too, that your average sociopath thinks everybody else is stupid, because they're CONSTANTLY lying and gaslighting others, sometimes just for their own amusement, and they rarely, if ever, get caught if they keep their misbehavior below a certain threshold. Honest people assume others around them are honest, because living in truth is just a much better way to live your life. Surrounding yourself with trustworthy people and TRUSTING them is a good way to live.
Here is my point: The problem with so called knowledgeable or intelligent criminals is they over do things, because of this their brain are overcompensating and over thinking things, that common normal people unconsciously do without thinking too much or even not remembering most details they do daily. That is why psychopath and sociopath is the authorities worst type of criminals. In this case the accused over compensate how things happen.
Could you consider increasing the font size of the subtitles? That would be helpful.
@Ano Nymous Sarcaustic ! I agree, though
Perfect murder ? she was found guilty I think we have different definition of perfection
Are you talking about the title? It’s a question not a statement
@@laure26 there shouldnt be any question about it its nowhere near perfect
Absolutely not. I replied to the question in the title. She was so sloppy. Horrible at her job!
Thats what I was thinking. They should of stuck up a question mark cause obviously not we are here to talk about it lol
Lol yes it sounds like it's written in sarcasm or it's written as a question without the question mark lol 😂
If I were LE in Pensacola I would go back and be reevaluating any case this woman was involved in as a CSI tech. If she could do this, God knows what she could have done on other cases.
Amen to that !!!!!
It will be. That's protocol.
Would have to be linked to motive though, her motive here was money, I think the only motivation to botch any case would be by bribe only.
@@UnderTheMillkyWay right. But considering her propensity to throw money around, according to her boyfriend. It would make one wonder if there had been bribes in her cases
She was a tech, not an investigator.
Someone would have to be blind to look at the chain of events and think that anyone else could’ve done it!
Total waste of tax payers money, I believe the case cost over US$7ml
Money is root of all evil this lady took another persons life over $34k man we live in a sad sad world
Greed is evil. Money is benign.
The LOVE of money is the root of all evil..
Money that wasn’t even hers too
I agree, but the quote is the "love of money" is the root of evil. Not the money itself but the love of it. She saw dollar signs! Such a betrayal.
My time in law enforcement and my incessant watching of true crime shows/dateline etc. has shown that when it comes to murder there’s always a small grain of truth in each lie. The moment she said “we went to the farm” I instantly thought “she is there or evidence to her murder can be found there. The devil is in the details.
"The devil is in the details".... What does that even mean ?
@@adambane1719 it means that from the perspective of the suspect, her own words will ultimately be her demise. All it takes is a vigilant officer to see clues buried deep in a sea of lies.
But she didn’t say she went to Britt farm
@@ronedgington2179 she said they went to her family’s property to ride horses. The very same property where her body was found.
@@adambane1719 it’s a VERY, VERY old saying, Adam. Almost as old as your name.
This case was many things...the perfect murder wasn't one of them.
What does a murderer look like? Never judge a book by its cover goes both ways.
It doesn't matter if she's a CSI. When emotions are high, they overtake the person. So, with her emotions out of control, Ash probably got sloppy. Especially if it was her first time. This is definitely not a perfect murder. She deserves a life in prison, if not the death penalty.
I disagree. She is a scientist. Logic should have prevailed because this was premeditated. She could have promised to make a payment plan not a murder plan.
@@sunrae7680 She's not a scientist. A CSI takes photos of crime scenes. They have a background in photography.
CSIs do not only take photographs at a scene. They have a background in forensics.
Was a ‘perfect murder’ really a question here…? The suspect is quite dense.
How did she not know about the way a phone pings? Everything she did was something a stupid criminal would do. Everything. I mean, she even left the body on her family property. For this to be premeditated…man, she’s dumb.
I know…disappointed.
Love the Prime Crime, love the host. Wish we could see more of him, Jesse Webber, He’s awesome, like the good ole days. As for Jensen in Florida. She is an awesome prosecutor. Very professional. She handles herself. very well.
good piece but the sound quality is all over the place
😆😆😆😆😂😂😂
Taylor’s girlfriend, at the time of her murder, is sitting right behind her in court. When she broke down crying it made me so upset. I’ll never understand people killing one another for ANYTHING OTHER THAN messing with a minor… But it’s not fair she will live a long, simple and rather easy life in prison, while her loved ones have to swallow their hearts and grieve a beautiful soul the rest of theirs!!
So you are the authority on when murder is justifiable? 🤡
@@lacymacdougall9660 Since when does sharing an opinion on when they think murder is justifiable mean she's claiming to be an authority on the matter?
isabel lind I didn't say she said she was. If you read my comment again, you will see that I asked her a question. I didn't make a statement.
She went from showing lots of skin and belong flirty to covering up all her skin and being somber and sad… guilty as charged
Can't stop watching this channel..love it 💕😘
I don’t understand how people can be so confident in thinking they won’t be caught in a crime. Blows my mind.
The evil and hatred that just came out of her eyes is enough to make me believe .
for me it was the resoluteness of the boyfriend :D "nope, wouldn't trust her ever."
Ash gives off Nicole Kessinger vibes imo
For real! LoL
I thought that same thing 🤔
I agree!
Ya confident in that room she’s getting off and showing hardly any emotion aside from nervous giggles. This woman’s demeanor changes a lot in the second interview. Once her phone got taken during the first interrogation an excuse/story was needed to explain the towers her cell pinged. That nervous giggle is so infuriating when she agrees to hand the phone over willingly. Though it’s satisfying that in those few seconds she lost all confidence of getting away with killing someone who trusted and loved her. She most likely started to think of lies to spin her way out of whatever the phone proved.
The truth is humans often think they’re smarter than they are. That’s why I’m a murder case a team of law enforcement and forensic experts all work together. It’s easy for one person to over look something, but not when it’s a team who is all open with each other against one or a few guilty liars who usually burry themselves.
Yes !!
Good Lord, the deception and greed for money will never end, rest in peace until we see each other again 🌿🌹
I live in Pensacola, met Ashley once at a bar. She seemed nice but I knew she had enemies. I’m also not her age, about 15 yrs younger. Never met Taylor though. This case really creeped us all out, she had sociopathic tendencies. RIP Taylor.
Lol
Stop the cap!
No she is dead serious. I can back that statement up because I was the BARTENDER at the time!! So wierd how all this turned out!
That's why you can't trust ANYONE!
It stands to reason that someone w/a personal connection to any given story will share their experiences. There aren't many people who don't. When people don't believe them I wonder how they go through life telling people who they may not know personally and who share a connection w/any given story/event that they're either lying or laugh at them in disbelief. They must be suspicious by nature, afraid of being duped over nothing, lol!
Imagine, that woman must have seen Taylor with her son, or at the very least, heard Taylor talk about her little boy. That evil woman robbed that little boy of his mother over greed 😡 disgusting
What exactly was she wiping from her eyes? I certainly didn't see any tears. I hate when people fake cry and wipe away invisible "tears." Glad she wasn't as smart as she thought she was. She was so confident in the beginning..loved watching all of that confidence fade! RIP Taylor.
Not the best use of her CSI experience, she even went to Home Depot!
She is specialised in forensics maybe,because she look like she was more focused on not leaving trails of DNA, instead of skills of profiling and investigation real police work
🤣🤣🤣
You can’t trust anyone these days. Narcissism is all around us.
A CSI didn’t know the pings would screw up her plans & talked to law enforcement without an attorney?! 😂 Far from the “perfect” murder
It always amazes me when the murderer starts crying after sentencing.
I mean seriously what did she expect?
Who else would murder your co-worker and then go bury the body on your property.
Never trust people with your money
😮Wow! I live in the small town of Milton, FL & I don't remember ever hearing about this!
I think Ashley got her out there by telling her the money in a lock box buried on her familys property. She gave her a shovel and pointed where it was supposed to be. While Ashley pretended to be on her phone Taylor was kneeling down trying to dig up a lockbox, Ashley shot her in the back of her head. That was the only way to get her in a vulnerable position.
This what I think too.
I had a gf that acted like ashleys bf. Always badmouthing me to everyone then acted all lovey dovey when we were together. I had literally 20 people telll me and say"why are you together"? I finally dumped her.
He was telling the truth
Thank you. Very satisfying ending.
The jury got it right which is not a sure thing especially in Florida. They let Casey Anthony walk.
Her face during the verdict, yeah let it sink in!! You’re going to the big house greedy!!!!
I feel sorry for her girlfriend. You can see her crying behind Ash during jury reading. Totally heartbroken
This is why I don't have or want any friends.
Everybody wants friends.
No friends like this
Can you imagine trying to blame someone else for something you did? I cannot.
Taylor was an awesome person. She was always way to nice to people the world will be a better place bow that her killer is behind bars.
"Did a CSI commit the perfect murder?" - she doesn't even know how cell phones work, what a terrible title.
She stole that money so she could buy her boyfriend toys. Or buy a place in his bed.
Most people would be upset if their best friend disappeared!?! My best friend is literally like a sister to me, like a twin. I worry if she forgets to text me that she got home safely after hanging out.
Bizarre behavior was a huge tell. Very interesting, I've never heard it this case. Thanks for uploading!
So sorry for your lost sending my condolences
I love lawyers professional bull shitters . “I know she was buying potting soil and concrete and that’s what we found the victim buried with but she didn’t do it “😂😂😂
My condolences to the family..
Come on. On her own families property? Lmao omg. I can’t get over the evidence in this case, Considering her Profession. (Or lack there of).
Wow, they better relook all the cases she’s ever worked on. 🤦🏻♀️ so glad she was caught!
Yep talking about someone in the past tense is certainly a "dead" giveaway.....
Thanks for the quality upload . Tragic story . Justice prevailed .
great report
she says ya you can look in my phone. immediately locks phone.
Background music was louder than interview footage which was barely audible and commentary was very loud by comparison. Please adjust audio levels to make it more enjoyable
21:15 look how she tries to act like she's wiping tears but her face is bone dry with no emotions
Strangely I watched that scene right after reading your comment, she's tripping
She not too bright, didn't show any concern for her friend and where she might be, and then proceeds to complain about how inconvenient it is to have all her stuff, what a narcacist.
Why did Miss Hollywood, CSI, bury a body on her family property?
How stupid!!!?😏
Arrogance, she tought nobody would suspect her.
Her eyes told the story. She killed her; she had no empathy in that interview room and none in that courtroom. Justice was swift and right.
Ugh, I hate it when the perpetrator flirts with law enforcement during questioning. Gross. How low can you get?
The commentary is great
Love this prosecutor amazing Miss Jensen!
Not saying she ain't guilty, but I hate it when investigators try to say the suspect isn't behaving the way someone should under similar circumstances. Not everyone responds the same way to stress and loss. There is no one way people behave. Only a behavioral psychologist can tell you that. And even they have to spend a good amount of time with them to determine that. It's one of those areas the criminal justice system is imperfect in and prosecutors will double down on those imperfections in trials. It's one of the reasons I think there should be at least one behavioral psychologist on every jury.
Good point about the behavioural psychologist. I do think there are things that are expected from innocent and guilty people though particularly in terms of language used. For example this woman showed concern for herself and not for her missing friend. If the police told an innocent person that they believe something bad had happened to a friend it would be appropriate to expect them to show concern. And clearly the police were correct about her behaviour being off because her “friend” was found dead on land belonging to her family etc. Are you aware of the channel JCS? You might enjoy it as it analyses interrogations and suspects behaviour. It’s really interesting.
Wrong!!! Normal people don’t talk crap about someone who’s missing!!! They are showing empathy and concern. You need to get a clue ! You don’t need to be a psychologist to see if someone is being genuine: it’s obvious! And she’s guilty!!! She shot her because she spent her $:
Oh Please! it was obvious she did the deed, find the remains on her family property you don't need no behavioral psychologist to tell you that. The evidence speaks for itself.😁
@@alanmoore2897 You completely missed the point of what I was saying.
@@gabrielamartiniuc6322 You missed the point of the comment...
The pathetic flirting in the interrogation room 🤦♀️
With a ‘friend’ like that who needs enemies.
When someone is sentenced to life, it should mean just that. Not sentenced to life but can get out in 25 yrs
In this case she was already currently in Prison for the embezzling and arson of her family's business, so she will not start serving the 25yrs to life until after that sentence factor in her age she was 41yrs old at the time...she will be over 70yrs old IF she gets out. The possibility of parole and getting granted parole are two VERY different things.
I think the judge said concurrently, though, not consecutively. I think.
She thought she was smarter than karma she spent her money the day she got it instead of paying it back she killed her guess being trained in forensics does not make you an expert in cell phone technology. Good job on solving this terrible crime.
For a moment while watching the vid, I thought "OMG she will get away wt it". Thank God she was sentenced to life in prison. No remorse whatsoever on her face. Cold.
Good job
The only evidence that wasn't there was the evidence Ashley would know how to collect. Literally, every other form of evidence was there. What are the odds. Smh
Taking away a young womans life for 34 thousand dollars.. such a small amount of money. We have to be better people.
Yea, it should be $100,000 minimum, to be good people.
We’re im from ppl get killed for a pair of jordans or bag of weed
Ridiculous
This is just one more reason why I don’t like having a cell phone. I don’t wanna be found! End of story!
A crime scene investigator and a private investigator that's a weird combination. May her soul rest in paradise 🙏
Watch who you call your friends
Dear Ms Ashley, why would you think you could get away with this? Privilege? You disgust me
Ashley MacArthur worked as a crime scene technician for about a year or less, many years before this happened. To keep referring to that as her profession is rather disingenuous. Please get the facts right.
Those are the facts.
To Laura Marie Helena: Not sure what your point is here, or why you seem so bothered. It really is irrelevant. You see, most people have enough logic and common sense about them, that they'd be quite aware of the existance of CCTV in stores and practically everywhere (indoors and out) these days, and as far as cellphones pinging off different cell towers as you move about through time and space, is old news. Your average 12 yr old would be able to be mindful of that. So simply put, the "fact" that she has had training in the CSI field, no matter how long ago, only shows how stupity reigns in her mind. That became quite obvious when she spent $34,000 that she was to hold for a friend. So, the way most of us see it, they are not referring to CSI as her prfession, but that she has had training here, that most have not, and even with that, she still has no logic and common sense. Could this be why she held the CSI job less than a year, as you tell it Laura?...... These are "THE FACTS"..........
@@trly3074 Being that your, um, wall of text, er, I mean your *post* is approximately thrice the length of my own, I dare say you seem much more "bothered" than I.
Contained within the brevity of my post is the fact that Ms. MacArthur worked long ago, and quite briefly, as a Crime Scene Technician. I stated this because her *former* and *very brief* stint as such was made so much more central in the video than warranted. Nowhere did I refer to the layperson's awareness of cameras, DNA, or any other forensic tool utilized in Crime investigation. That wasn't the point. Rather, I was simply pointing out something reported in the content of the video that could have been misleading. That is all.
Wow, well this is interesting 😳
She still has some kind of training and would or should be well aware of what was gonna happen. It doesn't matter how brief or long it was still stupidity as she knew they were going to find out she did it.
That's cold.
There's genuinely an ad every 90 seconds?
😩
Its always shocking how poorly the killer planned this: you hide the body in your own property? You go buy concrete on a big store with cameras?
Despicable crime.
Great Video👌
Bridgett Jensen is a fantastic prosecutor.
Yes! Beautiful and Smart!
She leaves a trail of evidence leading towards her then leaves her body on her family farm and she was resourceful? Pretty amateur
18:45 She didn't look like the type of person who is going to kill somebody - well maybe she doesn't for most people, but she absolutely does look like the killer to me, right there, the editor caught her facial expressions perfectly!
So much incompetence, they should all be fired.
They're a disgrace...🤮
Sounds like she has issues with lies & I believe she always got away with her lies & really believed she could pin this on her friends ex husband so glad they saw the truth
Please cover the Daniel Hotzclaw sham trial in Oklahoma City
There's no such thing as perfect crime...same thing there's no perfect person living in this world!...watching from Philippines...
How exactly was that a circumstantial case?
I believe when you give people, loan it with the belief that you won't give back.
What would have happened if she didnt allow access to her phone? Lets say she threw her cellphone. Would the police still be able to track her movements?
Yes.
The defence tried his best to have a cold blooded killer set free and he smiles and feels proud of himself what a father he would be
Lawyers have to defend ALL their clients with the same tenacity and devotion regardless whether or not they believe they are innocent or guilty. It’s what makes a good attorney. Plus if he doesn’t defend his client to the best of his/her abilities.. it brings up cause for appeals and for the right conviction to be thrown out, and a retrial set.
@@NORTAH85 actually nobody has to defend anyone guilty or innocent....get another job perhaps if your job requires you to try every evil trick in the book to get murderer's off free to kill again
@@craighall689 refer to the previous comment. Yes they do. Inadequate defense is grounds for an appeal and a mistrial. You’re an idiot!
I was in Milton but i was really alone murdering my 'friend!' Very sad story! 😔
If it was a perfect murder we wouldn’t be seeing anything about a case 🤨
One life expired one life wasted and many other lives ruined for less than $40k! No amount makes sense but given such a small amount it’s a ridiculous motive.