I am so grateful to have found your Channel. This video alone within the first four minutes has been such a help for me and dealing with my current staff. Thank you thank you thank you for such amazing tips!!!!
Does she equate wishing to provide feedback with not buying in? What if employees have valid questions or valuable input that could make the idea even better? The implication is that not being 100% on board with a management idea automatically means that one is not buying in. I think this is a dangerous precedent to set.
I have a friend who loves Cy Wakeman's ideas. I've listened to many of her talks now and can appreciate much of what she says, but I also believe there's something of a cold wall put up against employees. I can imagine that a business like Amazon, that demands peak performance in demanding 10 hour shifts probably uses these same methods of "come in joy of leave in peace." Not everyone who feels like the workplace can be improved is being a "victim" or a negative person. It's more likely that being on the floor gives them an insight that management does not have.
What if the "rock star employee" is actually the only person willing to speak up for the indignities that many or even most of their coworkers (including themselves) experience on a daily basis dealt to them by their higher ups? I believe that there are definitely "victims" but I'm also very aware that there's employee abuse rampant in the workplace on the grounds that employees are highly replaceable. This doesn't make genuine buy-in very feasible.
Yes! I think the same. The issue is that it's a constant drama when the issue is management because then the team won't be as engaged and this lack of engagement shows up in the results of the team, and in turn management won't bat an eye to help when they are struggling or to take them seriously, and in turn this aids in the lack of engagement from the team and it's a no-end situation, you know? It's very difficult to properly deal with a team when the issue of lack of engagement is caused by poor management.
I disagree. Rock stars sometimes think they are "untouchable" and want to bully sideways and upwards doing what they want and not the vision of the company.
Introduce me. My name is teleng. I am boss of catering. But the is one, i can't give strategy developed my company including make situation happy my co- workers, becausr i could not divide my workers workinv hours. Thar is one of my weakness and ignorance.
I am so grateful to have found your Channel. This video alone within the first four minutes has been such a help for me and dealing with my current staff. Thank you thank you thank you for such amazing tips!!!!
Low drama = high value. Love this formula!!
Does she equate wishing to provide feedback with not buying in? What if employees have valid questions or valuable input that could make the idea even better? The implication is that not being 100% on board with a management idea automatically means that one is not buying in. I think this is a dangerous precedent to set.
Great advise, thank you for the video.
I have a friend who loves Cy Wakeman's ideas. I've listened to many of her talks now and can appreciate much of what she says, but I also believe there's something of a cold wall put up against employees. I can imagine that a business like Amazon, that demands peak performance in demanding 10 hour shifts probably uses these same methods of "come in joy of leave in peace." Not everyone who feels like the workplace can be improved is being a "victim" or a negative person. It's more likely that being on the floor gives them an insight that management does not have.
It may not be the right work place if one can't buy in. Buy in is still not optional not to have drama
No buy in is negative. Grumblers
What if the "rock star employee" is actually the only person willing to speak up for the indignities that many or even most of their coworkers (including themselves) experience on a daily basis dealt to them by their higher ups?
I believe that there are definitely "victims" but I'm also very aware that there's employee abuse rampant in the workplace on the grounds that employees are highly replaceable. This doesn't make genuine buy-in very feasible.
Yes! I think the same. The issue is that it's a constant drama when the issue is management because then the team won't be as engaged and this lack of engagement shows up in the results of the team, and in turn management won't bat an eye to help when they are struggling or to take them seriously, and in turn this aids in the lack of engagement from the team and it's a no-end situation, you know?
It's very difficult to properly deal with a team when the issue of lack of engagement is caused by poor management.
I disagree. Rock stars sometimes think they are "untouchable" and want to bully sideways and upwards doing what they want and not the vision of the company.
This is a long explanation of ‘its my way or the highway’
How do you get long time union employees to buy in instead of stiring the pot?
Union employees are taught to be mediocre as not to advance to management. Making them due payers forever
Introduce me. My name is teleng.
I am boss of catering. But the is one, i can't give strategy developed my company including make situation happy my co- workers, becausr i could not divide my workers workinv hours.
Thar is one of my weakness and ignorance.