Thank you ... I am taking this course now and your videos were very helpful to me ...keep on :) P.S. I took 16 out of 20 in my midterm exam because of your help
At 17:12, why is it understood that the truth value of the conjoined system is true, rather than, let’s say, non-applicable if the antecedent is false? Sorry, I don’t have any background in logic.
I would understand the proposition in terms of "implication", that is "if...then...". Antecedent is also called "premise". The premise could be false, but the outcome nonetheless true, because the "consequence" does not so much depend on the falsity of the premise as much as on the presumed truth value with a false outcome. The later would be nonsensical. But if "I don't jump of the building -> I (still could) die (after all)". The false premise just doesn't negate the outcome. You could also take an example of a promise. "If I promise to do my homework -> I do my homework" "If I promise -> I don't do" - that's a broken promise! "If I don't promise -> I (still might) do" "If I don't promise -> don't do"
![BOWKYLION - วิงวอน (ex-change) [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/cLdnZWDaO-w/mqdefault.jpg)
This makes so much more sense than my current class. thank you!
Well done
LISANICS is also helpful for the learners of Linguistics th-cam.com/video/hhBaa27bWno/w-d-xo.html
Thank you ... I am taking this course now and your videos were very helpful to me
...keep on :)
P.S. I took 16 out of 20 in my midterm exam because of your help
Excellent!
This course is very helpful to me. Thank you very much.
Well done
LISANICS is also helpful for the learners of Linguistics th-cam.com/video/hhBaa27bWno/w-d-xo.html
thanks a lot
Thank you very much for the video, its very helpful. but i still have one question; what is the difference between truth and non-truth conditional.
an interesting question. I was able to find answers by searching for "truth and non-truth conditional" right away.
thanks, the video is useful.
very nice lecture
Well done
LISANICS is also helpful for the learners of Linguistics th-cam.com/video/hhBaa27bWno/w-d-xo.html
Which one is true?
1) ~ p INTRODUCE qr
2) ~ p BETWEEN q
3) p GIVE q
4) p BESIDE qr
im so glad ,was so much more than water
Well done
LISANICS is also helpful for the learners of Linguistics th-cam.com/video/hhBaa27bWno/w-d-xo.html
Than you so much I learnt alot
Well done
LISANICS is also helpful for the learners of Linguistics th-cam.com/video/hhBaa27bWno/w-d-xo.html
At 17:12, why is it understood that the truth value of the conjoined system is true, rather than, let’s say, non-applicable if the antecedent is false?
Sorry, I don’t have any background in logic.
Is this simply how the connective is defined?
Well done
LISANICS is also helpful for the learners of Linguistics th-cam.com/video/hhBaa27bWno/w-d-xo.html
I would understand the proposition in terms of "implication", that is "if...then...". Antecedent is also called "premise". The premise could be false, but the outcome nonetheless true, because the "consequence" does not so much depend on the falsity of the premise as much as on the presumed truth value with a false outcome. The later would be nonsensical. But if "I don't jump of the building -> I (still could) die (after all)". The false premise just doesn't negate the outcome.
You could also take an example of a promise.
"If I promise to do my homework -> I do my homework"
"If I promise -> I don't do" - that's a broken promise!
"If I don't promise -> I (still might) do"
"If I don't promise -> don't do"