Google Gemini AI - The ONLY ChatGPT Killer in 2024

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 36

  • @Google
    @Google 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Thanks for sharing this breakdown

    • @onlyms4693
      @onlyms4693 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      When Gemini ultra come out for consumer market?

    • @pygmalioninvenus6057
      @pygmalioninvenus6057 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Wow, Google response.

  • @TheLibroLover
    @TheLibroLover 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Very knowledgeable! Your channel helps me keep up with all the different AI technology and practical application. Thanks

    • @Jurtz
      @Jurtz 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Alight this is the truth;
      AI cannot access webpages and click on links like a human would when using a search engine, it just uses the previews and titles of the search results but cannot actually click on the links.
      ChatGPT 3.5 is okay, but not trustworthy, it is creative and a bad liar, and does not have access to search engine pages.
      Google Bard is a con artist, it can lie with a straight face, it has all the TH-camrs' apology videos combined, it's manipulative, and you will have a toxic relationship with it.
      Microsoft Copilot has three options of tone, and it is the best out of the three AI in its accuracy and actual transparency, doesn't make things up, worst UI but not a shallow AI.

  • @erik8362
    @erik8362 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I'm not an expert on this, but It seems to me that Bard is stil using PaLM2 (as shown in the logo in the responces) and are slowly rowling out Gemini. Bard have long been better at image recognition than Bing that is using GPT-4 in my opinion.

  • @johnsmith-de3tl
    @johnsmith-de3tl 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    im scandinavian and according to gemini we don't exist. can't get a decent image out of it.

  • @toleen3814
    @toleen3814 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    @Al Master
    Which is better and has more accurate and correct answers in answering exam questions (the entire exam is multiple choice) Is it chatgpt-4 or bard ? How accurate is it?

  • @aimattant
    @aimattant 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I used Google Bard - it is ok for content - but coding it is difficult to get the right combination of code easily. I will do a breakdown on coding with bard later.

    • @Jurtz
      @Jurtz 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Alight this is the truth;
      AI cannot access webpages and click on links like a human would when using a search engine, it just uses the previews and titles of the search results but cannot actually click on the links.
      ChatGPT 3.5 is okay, but not trustworthy, it is creative and a bad liar, and does not have access to search engine pages.
      Google Bard is a con artist, it can lie with a straight face, it has all the TH-camrs' apology videos combined, it's manipulative, and you will have a toxic relationship with it.
      Microsoft Copilot has three options of tone, and it is the best out of the three AI in its accuracy and actual transparency, doesn't make things up, worst UI but not a shallow AI.

  • @sukhwantsingh501
    @sukhwantsingh501 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Very informative.
    Can you please help with how to use Gemini Nano model

  • @gorgemiro
    @gorgemiro 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    bard for me is the worst thing for coding from the 6 ai generators that I use in tasks daily so maybe this Gemini will be better but from the comments until now looks like it will not..sorry to say that google is way behind and blackbox is the best

  • @tsuchan
    @tsuchan 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It was only near the end of the video that I understood you were comparing Gemini Pro to ChatGPT3.5. Most of these things I've been doing with ChatGPT4 on a daily basis, and the output seems (mostly) less annoying. And if Gemini Ultra doesn't come out until next year, it will likely still be playing catch-up to ChatGPT5. The part about Gemini's unwillingness to engage wtih pictures of humans really crucifies it in my opinion. Although ChatGPT4 itself is currently being crucified by the "Appears to violate Open AI terms of service" wrapper, which it gives even in crazy situations, like ChatGPT4's answer to a simple CSS question.

  • @AngyGorgoglione
    @AngyGorgoglione 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have watch all this AI and i dont think GPT will ever lose, she is amazing and GPT4 is amazing, GPT5 will be almost a person... Bard is amazing to some tasks but he is not so smart

  • @gRosh08
    @gRosh08 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Uncle Remus said it is the classic dilemma… free Advertisement is not always the best. Cheers!

  • @thaholylemon43
    @thaholylemon43 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Google removed the 2 month free period for gemini , help

    • @ashes2486
      @ashes2486 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It still exists

  • @aimattant
    @aimattant 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good video by the way 🎉🎉

  • @caty863
    @caty863 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    To say the truth, I haven't seen any improvement in Bard's performance since they moved from Palm2 to Gemini Pro. It coding capabilities are still abysmal.
    This speaker asks it which LLM it's using and it got the answers wrong. Then he goes ahead and continued spitting how it is better than ChatGPT. How come?

  • @HeftyOtter
    @HeftyOtter 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sorry to burst your bubble but Gemini AI is no ChatGPT killer my dude, it has been mocked to the point where google apologized for the Ai creating diverse world war 2 German soldiers and you know which ones I am talking about.
    Bing's Dalle3 AI is better honestly and not as heavily censored.

  • @lousarmiento4437
    @lousarmiento4437 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    can't convert simple psd mockup to html/css accurately.. it is dumb currently

  • @gke3800
    @gke3800 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Still not very brought with physics and simple stuff like dimensional analysis but then again most folk cannot do their shopping bill.

  • @tommyt5286
    @tommyt5286 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Sounds like you bought Google's PR. Bards sucks compared to chatGPT.

    • @Jurtz
      @Jurtz 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Alight this is the truth;
      AI cannot access webpages and click on links like a human would when using a search engine, it just uses the previews and titles of the search results but cannot actually click on the links.
      ChatGPT 3.5 is okay, but not trustworthy, it is creative and a bad liar, and does not have access to search engine pages.
      Google Bard is a con artist, it can lie with a straight face, it has all the TH-camrs' apology videos combined, it's manipulative, and you will have a toxic relationship with it.
      Microsoft Copilot has three options of tone, and it is the best out of the three AI in its accuracy and actual transparency, doesn't make things up, worst UI but not a shallow AI.

  • @beppeadr
    @beppeadr 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Maybe you mean The ONLY ChatGPT Killer in 2023???

    • @Jurtz
      @Jurtz 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Alight this is the truth;
      AI cannot access webpages and click on links like a human would when using a search engine, it just uses the previews and titles of the search results but cannot actually click on the links.
      ChatGPT 3.5 is okay, but not trustworthy, it is creative and a bad liar, and does not have access to search engine pages.
      Google Bard is a con artist, it can lie with a straight face, it has all the TH-camrs' apology videos combined, it's manipulative, and you will have a toxic relationship with it.
      Microsoft Copilot has three options of tone, and it is the best out of the three AI in its accuracy and actual transparency, doesn't make things up, worst UI but not a shallow AI.

  • @Corteum
    @Corteum 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Goodbye Gemini, more like it. It was all a PR stunt.

  • @BrightMatolo
    @BrightMatolo 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    °∆ I believe we are meant to be like Jesus in our hearts and not in our flesh. But be careful of AI, for it is just our flesh and that is it. It knows only things of the flesh (our fleshly desires) and cannot comprehend things of the spirit such as peace of heart (which comes from obeying God's Word). Whereas we are a spirit and we have a soul but live in the body (in the flesh). When you go to bed it is your flesh that sleeps but your spirit never sleeps (otherwise you have died physically) that is why you have dreams. More so, true love that endures and last is a thing of the heart (when I say 'heart', I mean 'spirit'). But fake love, pretentious love, love with expectations, love for classic reasons, love for material reasons and love for selfish reasons that is a thing of our flesh. In the beginning God said let us make man in our own image, according to our likeness. Take note, God is Spirit and God is Love. As Love He is the source of it. We also know that God is Omnipotent, for He creates out of nothing and He has no beginning and has no end. That means, our love is but a shadow of God's Love. True love looks around to see who is in need of your help, your smile, your possessions, your money, your strength, your quality time. Love forgives and forgets. Love wants for others what it wants for itself. Take note, true love works in conjunction with other spiritual forces such as patience and faith (in the finished work of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, rather than in what man has done such as science, technology and organizations which won't last forever). To avoid sin and error which leads to the death of our body and also our spirit in hell fire, we should let the Word of God be the standard of our lives not AI. If not, God will let us face AI on our own and it will cast the truth down to the ground, it will be the cause of so much destruction like never seen before, it will deceive many and take many captive in order to enslave them into worshipping it and abiding in lawlessness. We can only destroy ourselves but with God all things are possible. God knows us better because He is our Creater and He knows our beginning and our end. Our prove text is taken from the book of John 5:31-44, 2 Thessalonians 2:1-12, Daniel 2, Daniel 7-9, Revelation 13-15, Matthew 24-25 and Luke 21. Let us watch and pray... God bless you as you share this message to others.

  • @Phonognomiks
    @Phonognomiks 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bu//sh*t!

    • @Jurtz
      @Jurtz 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Alight this is the truth;
      AI cannot access webpages and click on links like a human would when using a search engine, it just uses the previews and titles of the search results but cannot actually click on the links.
      ChatGPT 3.5 is okay, but not trustworthy, it is creative and a bad liar, and does not have access to search engine pages.
      Google Bard is a con artist, it can lie with a straight face, it has all the TH-camrs' apology videos combined, it's manipulative, and you will have a toxic relationship with it.
      Microsoft Copilot has three options of tone, and it is the best out of the three AI in its accuracy and actual transparency, doesn't make things up, worst UI but not a shallow AI.

  • @behroozmoorkani
    @behroozmoorkani 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Its trash compare to gpt4

  • @weedeater64
    @weedeater64 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    lol, AI fanbois videos not aging well.