Discussing Starship's Fifth Test Flight with Fraser Cain
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 ต.ค. 2024
- John Michael Godier and Universe Today's Fraser Cain discuss the exciting developments in space exploration, focusing on Spacex and the upcoming fifth test launch of Starship. Join us as we discuss the details, analyzing the performance, challenges, and future implications of SpaceX's ambitious project.
Don't forget to like, share, and subscribe for more insightful discussions on space and science!
Fraser’s links
/ @frasercain
/ fcain
www.universeto...
TH-cam Membership: / @eventhorizonshow
Podcast: anchor.fm/john...
Apple: apple.co/3CS7rjT
More JMG
/ johnmichaelgodier
Want to support the channel?
Patreon: / eventhorizonshow
Follow us at other places!
@JMGEventHorizon
Music:
stellardrone.b...
migueljohnson....
leerosevere.ba...
aeriumambient....
FOOTAGE:
NASA
ESA/Hubble
ESO - M.Kornmesser
ESO - L.Calcada
ESO - Jose Francisco Salgado (josefrancisco.org)
NAOJ
University of Warwick
Goddard Visualization Studio
Langley Research Center
Pixabay
![The Wall Song ร้องข้ามกำแพง | EP.215 | พาเวล นเรศ - พูห์ กฤติน | 17 ต.ค. 67 [1/5]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/IUzrjuf60P4/mqdefault.jpg)
The best news to get while I’m at work. Not only is JMG dropping another video, but with Fraser? AND it’s a full hour? Highlight of the week, for sure
As much as I enjoy the topics you present Sir John, there is something to be said about the possum and Anna's shenanigans! Thanks for the wonderful segment with Mr. Cain!
I've heard probably 90% of the content y'all and Isaac et. al have produced. Halfway through and I think this is already one of my favorite videos on either of your channels.
YES! The return of the after show skits! Thank you JMG :D
This absolutely rocked my socks! The doc is obviously a rockstar scientist for jumping in on it.
Fraser rocks!
Yes! Back together again! I love you two guys, together and separately! Aloha!
Starship & Superheavy together stand a total height of a 40 story skyscraper with a 30 foot diameter
I hope this information is valuable to others out there
09:49 - I was looking for an exisiting comment before going in on this. The full stack is about 120m (metres) total.
Also! Both the Booster and the Ship reached sea level at *very* close to zero speed.
I don't see the complaints here about Fraser. I think it is not pessimism as much as it is reality of the situation of space and travel current tech. He knows what he is talking about as he follows space news and interviews a lot of smart people like John does.
Fraser is absolutely plugged into the general vibe of Astronomy academia and rocketry. He’s been reporting on it for over 2 decades. I don’t know how anyone could say that he doesn’t have a leg to stand on. He’s interviewed so many of the people who have made important contributions to exciting new stuff
I think Im willing to admit that fraser probably knows better and his points are at least worth considering.
Except that academia and industry had us on an eternal path to nowhere for infinite money post-apollo. So, it's possible to overestimate the perspective of being plugged into that network.
@@stephenknox2346This has far more to do with the whole Congressional funding and contract system than it does the scientists and engineers
He’s a Canadian that jumps on ship when shit gets hard.
Weak man.
@@infantjones Totally agree. People don't realize how much of NASA's missions are laws mandated by Congress.
I first read the name as “Frasier Crane.”
The "tossed salad and scrambled eggs" jokes have been done before, so you're not the only one
I thought it was Fraiser's thumbnail for his next video. Then the Event Horizon Theme came on and I go: 'TH-cam is really going haywire now 😑'. Then I realise it's John's Thursday Thunbnail 😆.
Ha yes! I just did exactly that! Great either way :)
Whe Event Horizon and Starship activities overlaps!! what a time to be alive!!
Bouncing ideas between two people is a wonderful thing when done right. Cheers JMG and Fraser Cain.
This is my favourite TH-cam podcast!
Love the discussion! - especially regarding exoplanets. Please bring Fraser back as much as possible :)
I love that Fraser is down for space stream. I've been telling EJ_SA for years now that we just need to band together and build our own cube sat for a rideshare. $275,000 for 50 kg and NanoRacks costs $90,000 per 1U CubeSat. Between that, launch insurance, and other incidentals it's like a million bucks total to launch a cube sat on a Falcon 9. I'm sure there's more incidental costs involved but it's nothing outside the realm of achievable for crowd funding.
Loved the outro, John
Love this team at event horizon and Thanks John for all the awesome interviews and main channel videos. Also love when you interview my other 2 favorite science based channels ( Cool Worlds David and Frasier) but all the guests on this channel are awesome.
We need more of the Possum! Thanks for the episode!
I can’t wait for this!!!!!!!
New Glenn will launch payloads into high-energy orbits (suppoedly). It can carry more than 13 metric tons to geostationary transfer orbit (GTO) and 45 metric tons to low Earth orbit (LEO).
Love this guy. I completely agree with his thoughts about humans on Mars. I find it hilarious the way Elon talks about Earth has 10 years at most and we have to colonize Mars in the next 5 years! 😂😂😂
@@josemanuelruiz2036 he's constantly saying if we don't start now that we have the capability, the opportunity may go away, much like the Saturn v. He wants 1 million by 2050. I think 10k is a best case scenario lol. But optimism is in Elons dna
@@josemanuelruiz2036
Elon said 50 years to colonize Mars with 1 million people. The Starship program has to work with the next 5-10 years in order to meet that goal and that’s with reusability 💯 nailed down. That’s realistic if you have people whom believe that goal IS possible.
Your “generalizing” Elons words. While it may seem like that’s what he said, if you actually listen to his interviews he’s always said the same things. 1 million people, 1000 ships, flying every 3 days (or so), 50 years, he will be dead by the time Mars is fully colonized they way he thinks it should be. Mars must be self sustaining so that should any ships stop coming (from Earth) Mars will survive on its own.
That is NOT possible within 10 years.
Elon never stated it that way.
The way you stated your information is false and give many the wrong type of data.
@@magnamic5614 Mars is dead, it does not have a global magnetic field so Elon’s ideas of colonization are useless. Terraforming is not a real option. To travel there is suicidal due to gamma radiation. We need to understand that our priority must be our planet’s health, specially oceans, to recycle as much as possible, lower population, etc. Humans are designed for earth and this race will be extinct here.
Starship is just a gimmick as his FSD, Hyper Loop, Boring, NeuraLin, Zip2.
@@ZorroComputersthe most powerful and advanced rocket ever built is a gimmick ?
Global telecommunications business is worth much less than 10T$. I looked it up and most sources say between 1-2T, the only one specifying that number is ERM, showing up the total value of Tech, Media AND Telecomm. Felt like pointing that out for accurate info.
Thank you sir, accurate info is always welcomed. I just learned something I appreciate that
It is growing exppnentially
It's strange that that number was seared into my brain. Yeah, 2024 is $1.5 billion with an annual increase of about 6%. I'll update that in my brain. :-)
I love JOhn but i'm a bit taken aback by how little he knows about rockets. I mean, proclaiming Vulcan as the "surefire way forward as a reliable vehicle for NASA"... Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy have left the chat.
35:34 this
I want another shuttle....and some bong hits
Would living on Mars be worse/harder than living on the ISS, though? People are able to survive there for months at a time.
There's even less gravity, and outside the ISS gets way colder than it does on Mars. Plus, you can't have a car on the ISS 😅
@@youaremopped living on mars is far from earth, resupply is very difficult, it takes at least a year to get back, there’s no protection against radiation unlike at the ISS, the dust is fine and sharp and might wreck all devices over time, etc etc.
Yeah if they were the same distance. The problem is the distance though. If you have a medical emergency on the ISS you can be back in a hospital in half a day.
We have never returned something from mars. Ever. Let alone with people. We have returned plenty of capsules from space, we’re pretty good at that now, and it is a semi regular occurrence. You can evacuate the iss and return to earth with relative ease. There’s no way to do anything close to that on mars. At all
You need to watch more TH-cam videos to understand how difficult and extreme Mars really would be, and the technical challenges that go along with it the ISS is like walking down the street versus going Halfway Around the World in a 12-ft rowboat
Nobody is going to mars for thirty years.
I can't sleep, it's almost midnight, this will fix it
The thing that multiplies the risks in the Starship project is there are high risk milestones that are interlocked with each other. Reusability has to be rapid or nothing else works. It has to meet payload goals or nothing else works. It has to be refueled in orbit or it's never going beyond Earth orbit and that depends on rapid reusability and payload. That's the simplified version of interlocking risks but they penetrate the second tier of risks as well
Love your videos but the endings always are jarring and if I fall asleep to your voice I’m I’m usually awakened at the end of the videos. Just a thought. Thanks
haha. me too.
From tabby’s star to Ship 5. Quite the arc.
I listened to this while having a Sunday morning lying and ended up falling asleep by mistake.
Or was that the intention of the mellifluous voices?
I wonder if SpaceX is just too hyper focused on getting full reusablility before starting to use the system. Seems like they were just wrong about actually needing to quickly reuse the Starship for it to be cost efficient, pretty sure they are cheap enough to just make more Starships till even if it takes months to get it working it would still be way better than any other rocket. Just using it a bunch like that seems like it would be the best way to work towards full reusablility as you get faster at recovery.
Interesting how these boys jump on the wagon after the Men did the heavy lifting.
And these boys won’t comment, because they still understand their place.
The heros at NASA are simply too busy to complain about creepy billionairs jumping on the wagon after they did all the heavy lifting.
@@T.efpunkt NASA came out with a free fundamentally flawed reusable architecture concepts and developed only one of them to mixed results (for its intended purpose). SpaceX and, hopefully, Stoke Space are the first to make it actually work.
NASA’s contribution can’t be forgotten, but acting like the teams at private firms haven’t worked miracles over the past couple of decades is disingenuous. NASA walked so SpaceX could run.
I misread the title, I thought it was Frasier Crane 😅
Id watch that
I'm listening...
Freudian analysis of the universe 😉
Great video and information !
Thanks Gentlemen, a very interesting show next time you should get Issac on as well . Anyway hope you all have a Wonderful Weekend. PEACE AND LOVE TO EVERYONE ❤❤.
We may not have to wait 500 years for someone to go get the wreckage of starship. I bet an adversary would love to grab it off the ocean floor today so they could study it and copy the designs
Fraser is so anti Mars. During the first interplanetary war he will for sure be fighting on the side of Earthlings.
Beltalowda.
@@frasercain tumang!
Great work
This was good
Too late to explore earth - too early to explore the stars...
@@Victura_Gaming lets be real. Nobody today has the ambition to explore anything anyway.😂. Why explore it when you can see it on your phone with 0 effort. Pathetic💯
Starship is a game changer, it's not often you find that the most advanced, most capable provider of anything is also the cheapest
It’s none of those things 😂. Can’t leave low earth orbit so it fails at being a rocket. If this was the 1930s maybe it’d be the most advanced 😂 India spending 74 million and visiting the moon is a game changer but it doesn’t have the buzzwords and shiny exterior.
Cause they rob us blind
John: Uranus is weird
Fraser: no you
Am from Phoenix, shout out to Willis Carrier
Scott Manley next, please and thanks.
Why not our moon first before Mars?!?!?!
Definitely the best target.
@@waxeggoil3130 AMEN!!! Thank you!
I totally agree. The Moon has so many lessons to teach us about living in space. It's so close, and relatively quick to get to.
If Booster 12 is caught successfully, it should go in the Smithsonian.
SpaceX has been remarkably unsentimental about Starship so far. It may get scrapped, but I agree. It deserves a permanent spot in the Rocket Garden at least.
I was under the impression they purposely made holes in the ship to review what damage would occur. That was intentional...
Well said @MightyMuffins
The real excitement from Starship is going to come by proximity - LEO tourism (middle class accessible). Lunar tourism (upper middle class accessible). Mars tourism and settlement (upper class, indebted/sponsored colonists, government sponsored astronauts).
Nice audio.
Probably both recorded locally, no unnecessary noise reduction ruining it... and decent bitrate or lossless..
@@jouniko Exactly, that's what we did.
When there are 40,000 Starlink satellites in orbit, how easy would it be for an enemy to cause a cascading failure of not only Starlink but also other satellites by intentionally destroying a few of them?
May not require an enemy.
It would be a low orbit Kessler Syndrome, meaning a few years or less to fix. Still not good but recoverable.
@@worldwideroach This. Satellites that fly this low are actually better because they re-enter the atmosphere in just a few years. If there is a cascade of collisions, it'll be cleaned up in 5 years. Higher orbits can last for decades or even centuries.
@@frasercainwell at least Elon’s space trash will clean itself up.
Theoretically.
@@frasercain it will not be "cleaned up", it will pollute our atmosphere with tons of metals when all these sattellites re-enter. Like all of elons projects it's poorly thought through and poses a severe danger to our biosphere.
Fraser "Stick-in-the-mud" Cain!
You guys talking about space tourism gave me possibly a billion dollar idea, but I don’t need a billion dollars, so here it is. Use starship to send a bunch of mars rovers to mars. People pay to tool around with them, never have to commit to years of travel, but get to screw with mars, something only a handful of people get to do? Seems like there’s a market for it. Want to pick up that rock? Sure, want to test things about it? Go right ahead. Then the idea grew. Boston Dynamics atlas robots. Want to be the first person to throw a rock on mars? Let the bidding begin! One gun arrives with an atlas robot and we might have cylons though. I don’t want cylons.
All hail the opossom overlord !
Centuries away is a wild statement. Thinking that Mars colonization is a greater leap than the age of sail compared to today? Bizarre.
How? We’ve been to the moon a handful of times. Mars is leagues more difficult 🤦🏽♂️ people act like we’re close and we’re nowhere close. Idk if it’s ignorance or copium. We’re minimum 50 years away but centuries isn’t so far fetched
Humans discovered sails thousands of years ago, someone held some fabric or animal skin up in the wind and felt the push of the wind, it’s literally not rocket science!
Artemis and sls… not a fan because it seems there is no long term vision.
Orion good enough if you can pair it with blue and/or SpaceX
If we wait for BO to build O'NEIL Cylinders, we ain't gonna make it
2 of my favourite TH-camrs together wohooo 🎉
My two favorites
Thanks
SpaceX and their engineers are incredible! Muskrat the Fash can get hit by a malfunctioning CyberTruck!
There's nothing to argue about; the first 4 flights WERE successful. The payload was data, and data was retrieved. These are test vehicles, just like cars, rockets are tested to see how the system performs. Anyone who says they weren't successful simply doesn't understand the process.
And the youtube algorithm going to suppress this genuine opinion just bc this person isn't licking the youtubers butthole because here is a comment, a like, and some engagement.
Launch, BOOM! LAUNCH, LANCH BOOM, BOOM!
Speak for yourself, I would leave for Mars tomorrow.
The future is not rockets. Ive been fallowing the alternative propulsion fields and those are already showing results
I bet you a NetZilla would be way better at catching rockets than MechZilla!
You might be right. Lol. But it can't put it back on the stand
@erikmoore7402 That's truee
Nah. A giant dirigible.
Why don't they put an inflatable balloon in the Starship payload bay so it will inflate after reentry and stop the Starship from sinking? This way the Starship can be recovered and inspected - they would learn so much!
There is so much data that is needed before you can just yeet a colony to Mars, It's one of those things that an AI powered robot might be useful to help you figure out, because you are going to have to build under ground to have any real protection from the radiation. So figuring out how to dig large spaces under mars, and see how suitable it really is for that.
I disagree that development of jwst is bad because this means we can upscale it for starship and achieve the same efficiency.
All your hedges are belong too us
Great interview! Thanks to both of you!👍🏼
I'm really surprised that there has been no discussion of Hypersonic thrust transition for these platforms, rocet engines all the way seems so 20th century.
Yeah buddy. You solved it.
What is stopping SpaceX putting a camera on every Starlink satelite they launch and offering access? They could make a bit extra from it.
Neck-Zilla? Thats my wifes name!
DREAM COLAB
TH-cam is going haywire. They are selling.
Aka Staturn, or Titan
The billionaires in space game have not pushed the envelope to the point where they´ve solved the surface to orbit problem. I am no math surgeon but i don´t think building ever bigger rockets to launch from the bottom of a gravity well like Earth is the answer...
while it isnt realistic due to how complicated it would be would a small under-sea settlement with a few anchored buildings/domes be much easier to acomplish than a mars settlement?
while it would be complex and expensive to set up and maintain it would be less than a thousandth of the cost and and probably result in more than a thousandth of the scientific advances but in a different area.
it would likley even result in other insights into setting up a research station in another tough enviroment like antartica which would help towards space settlement.
Yeah it's cheaper to go under water but it's not a viable escape strategy for the people who ruined the planet in order to make enough money for private spaceflight.
There are undersea research labs with people living in them right now
@@X85283 yeah but from what i heard they are fairly shallow.
i was thinking much deeper like in the abyss. something large and partially self suffient at a deep location would be a struggle to set up and maintain but still be way easier and cheaper than mars and probable result in more scientific advances per dollar, should result in some insights for settlemet, and even be just as effective as a backup for humanity as sending people to mars.
@@ruspjWhy you'd want to go down to the abyss though? It's a barren world down there. Instead you want to stay in shallow waters, where sunlight and resources are plentiful.
@@tuomasronnberg5244 could say the same about goin to mars where yes theres sunlight but its just as barren with less resources available
wasnt suggesting it would be worth doing just that it would cost a small fraction of mars and probably result in more descoveries per dollar. would give insights into building a settlement in a inhospitable location which would be a great help towards mars. the a deep location would be as just effective as a isolated settlement to protect humanity from a major disaster as a settlement on mars, and would be a lot easier to make truly self suffiient than mars.
the first few manned flights to mars would probably not last long enough for a return trip if they go before there has been a decades old moon settlement to learn what can go wrong within range of a urgent rescue/resupply.
It's laser hinge...
Would you land tho John, that is the question. Dark matter workhorse.
A set of cameras in space showing live pictures would be orsonlm.you could charge to trancmite to partys ect it would pay for its self in a week or. Im surprised no one has already done this.wot a great live streem channel that would be . fantastic.??? Would make a fortune....
With Tesla Humanoid Robots, building the infrastructure on Mars long before humans get there. Making it a little easier for humans to live on other planets.
💀 you really think Tesla can develop practical humanoid robots within 30 years. It’s amazing seeing people believe the hype from these snake oil companies 😂 Boston dynamics maybe but then there’s the weight problem.
Tesla’s robots are hilarious garbage.
Something is off about this Frasier...
I can’t quite pin it down, but I’ve always felt this
The moon makes a lot more sense in the short term. It is much closer. The technology needed for Mars would be largely the same and very similar. So, why not start with that? I think we'll find that we need 1G regularly in order to stay healthy. That will require spinning habitats. The best place for that would be underground, maybe in lava tubes. Once this and other technology makes us comfortable on the moon, then Mars will make more sense. Until then, there would be increasing robotic exploration missions to Mars and a few small human missions before the infrastructure for mass colonization can occur. I'm not sure Starship is fit to take people to Mars. I think something else needs to be designed with the intent of being assembled in orbit after being delivered by Starship. I think it would be a good idea for it to have artificial gravity. My cursory research leads me to believe that a ship designed to spin for artificial gravity should be big enough to have a radius of rotation for the main habitation area of at least 80 meters. This is to make the Coriolis effect tolerable. I have seen arguments that a shorter radius can be adapted to, but that seems less than ideal. For fun, I am trying to design a ship about 200 meters long and 40 meters wide, housing around 600 people going to and from Mars. It spins end over end. This is my version of Buzz Aldrin's Mars Cycler idea. Once that exists in numbers, Mars colonization would become possible for average humans. Thanks for reading :)
SLS is not a "wonder of modern engineering", it's a "wonder" of late 1970's engineering. Which makes me "wonder" why we bothered wasting decades and billions of taxpayer dollars on it.
SLS was never meant to be technologic wonder. NASA administrator Mike Griffin sold the project by saying using shuttle hardware and contractor base would faster and cheaper than starting from scratch. He was wrong. None the less, SLS will return the US to the moon.
Because Congress said "thou shalt use the shuttle contractors for this new rocket providing jobs in my district".
@@chimpychimp4921 SLS was never meant to be a technologic break through. It was built using shuttle hardware and contractors on the mistaken belief it would be faster and cheaper than starting from scratch.
@@armandomercado2248as long as we allow congressmen and senators to profit from policy decisions we will never have a truly successful government space program.
Of course the space sector isn’t the only sector of life that is affected by the current system.
@@russellharrell2747 This is the system that we have. No commercial company is going to go to the moon because there's no profit in it.
Astronauts are paid a salary to go to the moon and they gonna charge people to go to mars seems a little mad
sigh. Falcon 9 already dramatically lowered launch costs. That is why they get so many missions. Starship conversation was missing on critical point. A single starship has as much pressurized volume as the entire International Space Station. Starship will revolutionize space stations.
Launch costs to low earth orbit and we literally pay more now so even that’s bs. People really will eat up all the bs I swear 😂. Going to ISS is leagues different from getting to Mars. India went to the moon for $74 million
Sorry, your camera sat is already obsolete.
I’m sending up the spherical camera for an immersive projection room in my house.
Then I’m going to send one spherical sat to each and every planet of the solar system for all the other rooms in my mansion.
Honestly, I don't like the way you approach this. I feel like you're taking extreme stupid examples and then saying therefore simple things won't happen. A base on Mars is NOT hundreds of years away, no way. I don't think Musk's "million people on Mars" will happen in his lifetime, and I think he knows it. Talking about gestation on Mras is like step 98 out of a hundred. The first people who go to Mars won't "struggle to survive", they will be small numbers, perhaps in the dozens initially, and they will have all the things they need to survive, similar to setting up a base in antarctica. Habitats will be sent without people first, as well as food, water, heavy machines to move earth (regolith) around etc etc. Initially humans will go, live in basic habs, and use machines to move regolith around, dig trenches to put more habs in and bury them as shields against radiation. Once these basic structures are built, more people will trickle in, more gear to expand habitation, provide more room for recreation and growing food, long range rovers to explore water deposits, landings there with gear to process ice and create fuel and oxygen. Once the basics are setup growth can expand exponentially. People that go won't be having families on Mars at first, they'll be people who don't want kids, and be prevented from having them until it can be determined it's safe. They aren't just going to send a bunch of people and say, "good luck guys, hope it all works out!" It will be carefully planned, at least in the beginning until science can be done about procreation.
When you see this episode only went up 28 mins ago 🎉🎉🎉🎉😂😂❤Event Horizon makes Thursday sooooo Good 👍 👏 👌
Fraser taking a break from gardening in the Pacific rain forest 🙂
Edit: At least no intelligent possums there.
We do have invasive possums here. I need to watch them a little more carefully now.
@@frasercain Ha, ha! Maybe they build a laser to fight off the cougars.
Frasier's take on Mars is just off the mark. He seems convinced that his perspective is the only rational one, and anyone who disagrees must be irrational. He's completely wrong about that.
Do you have any specific disagreements with points he made?
Literal cope🤦🏽♂️ he’s right, sci-fi has distorted people’s perception of space travel
@@infantjonesI do, but it's more about his negative view on Mars and colonizing it. It taints everything he says on the subject. In short, my impression of him is that he's an incurable naysayer. It feels like if we were in the 60s, he'd be arguing against going to the moon, saying it's too risky, the environment is too harsh and we probably can't do it anyway. He'd claim people would die and the mission would be a disaster. He'd prefer we just send a few probes and stay in our safe, comfortable couches. (My take on him may be a bit unfair, but not too much, I hope).
I can't wait to be wrong.
@@frasercain And I can't wait you to be proven wrong 😉 I think your facts are correct (various hazards and so on), but your conclusions are way, way too pessimistic IMO. By the way, I watch your channel regularly and like your content very much, so thank you for doing what you do.
Wow, first time I got not even halfway through one of your videos and had to call it. Let’s see, who do I trust more: once-a-century genius and world’s most successful capitalist, or Fraser Cain? Sorry, just not interested in your concern trolling.
Your most successful capitalist is living on government subsidies. LOL.
Fraser is such a great communicator.
No GMO humans for ethical reasons? We don't all share the same ethics. I'm sure GMO humans will happen outside the western context.
Starship is going to work, and it's laughable to think that blue origin is going to cut into anyone's launch market lol they still haven't even made orbit. Frasier sounds like a bitter ex girlfriend when he talks about SpaceX lol . The rest of the world is a hundred years behind SpaceX.
Starship main task will be build and maintain the Starlink constellation, go to Mars every 26 months and send up the next generation of space stations. It will play a role in NASA's Artemis program so long as NASA doesn't run out of money.
lol cope harder. You sound a lot like Lockhead, Boeing, etc. It’s really bizarre to cheer on a monopoly. Competition / capitalism is the best way forward for space travel to innovate and bring down costs across the board
Mars Sucks 😮😂
Elon musk is going into politics, he lost sight of the Mars dream. We'd be lucky if we can go back to the moon.
I intentionally stopped following Frasier. I'm a huge fan of event horizon and jmg. Frasier comes off as arrogant. Imho. I was torn as to whether to listen. I just don't like his approach. But EVENT HORIZON!!!@
I'll just skip this one
strange you mention that. i dont wanna make this a diss track or anything but 3 - 4 weeks ago i kinda got pushed over the edge by the way Fraser (or Frasier?) always cuts ppl off mid sentence. dont get me wrong i know he's having a discussion with these ppl but a lot of times he dishes his opinion smack dab in the middle of the other person's sentence and im truly left wanting to know what the real scientist was trying to say. :( anyways, I even mentioned this fact in the comments on his channel. but recently it's become too much for me. i cant/dont watch his shows anymore. i get that he's enthusiastic and all but meh... im on the hunt for someone else to fill the void. 😂 just to clarify, JMG is great imho. this has nothing to do with him
You don’t like the truth lol
@@NonBinary_Star I think that's fair. My purpose with the interviews is to do journalism, I'm trying to learn information, and that requires interrupting or restating what the person said to make sure I understand it. I try to make it into a natural conversation as much as possible, but my goal is different from someone like Lex Friedman who's just having a chat with someone.