2:55 Why did "Destructive Daruma Karma Cannon" effect, that sends face-up monsters to the grave, resolve, if there was no monster on the field, that could be set face-down ?
Makes you send the monsters to the grave not destroys them, card says if any cards are face up the owner must send them to the grave. Sangen summoning prevents them from being targeted by the first part of karma cannon, but not the second part forcing you to send them
@@Sableye0.0 you read the card, it says "then", A has go happen for B to happen, at least one monster must be set by the cannon. Less laugh emojis and more learning how to play.
Sorry I was unfamiliar with the ruling until I looked it up. You are correct. Reading the card first glance I would presume the effect resolves, and watching on stream this action with a certified judge I spoke without thought. Thank you for clarifying, bad judge 😅
@@jofx4051That shouldn't even work, he tributed it for cost (i assume) to use it's GY effect, but Imperm negates all effects of the monstet it targets. Meaning: This until Minute 13 already, is a just a massive amount of missplays including the Sangen stuff and Karma Cannon, like, holy moly. This, as an OPEN Final, is kind of embarassing i'm sorry
@@flamingphoenixleo223 you got it almost right. He used it to "try" to bounce, being negated by Imperm, and then used Sphere's tributed effect, which Imperm can't "follow" because Sphere in GY is another card. Sangen without discard and Daruma sending, you are right, they're misplays, and Daruma actually changes a lot of the outcome
this was a joke of a finals daruma cannon resolving when it shouldnt, prosp digging for 6 after only banishing 3, marcello B's co-commentator having a annoying voice, tempai not discarding for field spell this was just a whole late april fools joke of a event.
nah, daruma's resolving the way you think is an ocg thing, so it can totally be different for TCG, i'd personally see no reason why it wouldn't send those tenpai to the grave main phase 1, seems perfectly logical from a game mechanic standpoint, the card doesn't even state "at least 1" after the "change as many as you can".
@@silverhyperdeath6815 like i said, ocg vs tcg thing and also there are several examples of similar effects where the card actually specifies "at least 1", meanwhile this doesn't. putting so much importance on properly identifying and interpreting a single word ("then") is dumb game design and shouldn't be a thing, especially since it's not intuitive nor easily accessible information.
2:55 Why did "Destructive Daruma Karma Cannon" effect, that sends face-up monsters to the grave, resolve, if there was no monster on the field, that could be set face-down ?
Makes you send the monsters to the grave not destroys them, card says if any cards are face up the owner must send them to the grave. Sangen summoning prevents them from being targeted by the first part of karma cannon, but not the second part forcing you to send them
Retracting my previous comment. If no cards were flipped face-down, its second effect should not have taken off. Bad judge.
@@darrend0518 incorrect
@@BGLoscar what bad judge? There was none involved. Bad players maybe?
@@andarerYT What do you mean none? They were there. Sarcasm?
WAS THAT A BUSTER BLADER DECK?!?!??! 👀👀👀👀👀
Lets go tenpai, BUT ALSO LETS GO BUSTER 🎉🎉🎉
0:52 is he…. Removing 3 and reveal 6 for prosperity ???????
I see at least 4/5, because he dropped 1, then dropped like 2/3 and then another 1. Still kind of sus tbh
He dropped 1, then if u look at the Links, he dropped 4, then 1 more for a total of 6
@@redominusred7058 true, thanks
Daruma karma cannon didn't set anything face down so nothing should have been sent to the graveyard
Sure, if nothing set, rest effect didn’t resolve
Cannon literally says to send it 😢 I should have read the card cause I would have done the same thing
@@Sableye0.0 you read the card, it says "then", A has go happen for B to happen, at least one monster must be set by the cannon.
Less laugh emojis and more learning how to play.
Sorry I was unfamiliar with the ruling until I looked it up. You are correct. Reading the card first glance I would presume the effect resolves, and watching on stream this action with a certified judge I spoke without thought. Thank you for clarifying, bad judge 😅
I think you guys need to learn how to read. The card says "as possible" .if its 0 its 0. then you can send all face ups to grave
How can I summon chundra with chundra? XD
Ayo you can't do that 😅
Buster Blader δεύτερη θέση 2024 πάμε Ελλαδάρα γαμώ‼️
Δεν βγήκε δεύτερος. Δεύτερος ήταν snake eye kai meta top 3-4 snake eye kai branded. Top 8 βγήκε
Ίσως τοπ 5 δε θυμάμαι αν υπάρχει άλλος με 8-1 πέρα από τους τοπ 4
@@Manossarris όπως και να έχει ο μερακλής έφτασε τελικό με buster blader στα μάτια μου είναι ο αληθινός νικητής 💪
Lol many cheating / missplay ?
2:36 he didnt discard a card after add a card with his field spell
Chundra cant ss chundra lol
He forgor to discard ☠️, he attempted to discard Pot
He discaded that after he remembered
And some sort of oversee the card effects...
13:15 Maybe can be a major but what exactly did he return with sphere?
@@jofx4051That shouldn't even work, he tributed it for cost (i assume) to use it's GY effect, but Imperm negates all effects of the monstet it targets. Meaning: This until Minute 13 already, is a just a massive amount of missplays including the Sangen stuff and Karma Cannon, like, holy moly. This, as an OPEN Final, is kind of embarassing i'm sorry
@@flamingphoenixleo223 you got it almost right. He used it to "try" to bounce, being negated by Imperm, and then used Sphere's tributed effect, which Imperm can't "follow" because Sphere in GY is another card. Sangen without discard and Daruma sending, you are right, they're misplays, and Daruma actually changes a lot of the outcome
Never seen a final game 1 with so many missplays
Amazing
Are these judges blind? I couldn't even finish this video after I saw 3 illegal plays in one turn
What?
What am I looking at? 😮
Yu-Gi-Oh at its peak
this was a joke of a finals daruma cannon resolving when it shouldnt, prosp digging for 6 after only banishing 3, marcello B's co-commentator having a annoying voice, tempai not discarding for field spell this was just a whole late april fools joke of a event.
nah, daruma's resolving the way you think is an ocg thing, so it can totally be different for TCG, i'd personally see no reason why it wouldn't send those tenpai to the grave main phase 1, seems perfectly logical from a game mechanic standpoint, the card doesn't even state "at least 1" after the "change as many as you can".
@@JazzberryJammm it needs to flip atleast one face down its a then effect. If a card if flipped down your opponent sends its on the card
@@silverhyperdeath6815 like i said, ocg vs tcg thing and also there are several examples of similar effects where the card actually specifies "at least 1", meanwhile this doesn't.
putting so much importance on properly identifying and interpreting a single word ("then") is dumb game design and shouldn't be a thing, especially since it's not intuitive nor easily accessible information.
@@JazzberryJammm thats what yugiohs all about different words have different properties like send, destroy, send to grave vs discard etc etc
@@silverhyperdeath6815 and like i said, it's dumb game design
I need 3 Daruma Karma Cannon from Greece
What? 😂
Lol Idk man...alot of sus looking plays happening in this finals match....
what is this? 😂
Daruma cannon deserves an ulti.