To be fair, Netflix's Avatar had its good points especially Zuko's relationship with his crew. It has good characters minus Sokka. It is WAY EASIER to defend Avatar than RoP. RoP is utter desecration of lore. Avatar had the effort of sticking to the lore albeit not entirely sticking to it.
Well Rings of Power feels like its written that on a fundamental level despise everything Tolkien stands for, Avatar feels like it was written by people that like the show but don't understand nuance and just have an understanding of writing of a 13 year old writing fan fiction for the first time, except the 13 year old might get better and learn from failures.
@@dpolaristar4634 I really appreciate that we're all deferring to being 13 when writing like this is okay. There is definitely a "phase" going on when writers are around that age. Which makes it more remarkable that the "pros" have devolved to that phase the rest of us outgrow.
RoP is the greater failure. AtLA is a worse failure. The man who dies attempting scale Mt. Everest has failed to achieve an immense undertaking while the man who falls to his death from the top of the Grand Canyon failed to walk a much easier path already laid out for him. Both are tragedies, but they hit differently.
It really never gets old. My 5-year-old has watched the 3 extended editions at least 10 times already & I just never tire of them. (And yeah, my kid is really weird, she legitimately sat through, not only all of the extended ROTK in one sitting, but also the credits because she likes the music - 4 1/2 hours. 😂)
"Commodified fantasy takes no risks: it invents nothing, but imitates and trivializes. It proceeds by depriving the old stories of their intellectual and ethical complexity, turning their action to violence, their actors to dolls, and their truth-telling to sentimental platitude. Heroes brandish their swords, lasers, wands, as mechanically as combine harvesters, reaping profits. Profoundly disturbing moral choices are sanitized, made cute, made safe. The passionately conceived idea of the great storytellers are copied, stereotyped, reduced to toys, molded in bright-colored plastic, advertised, sold, broken, junked, replaceable, interchangeable." -Ursula K. LeGuin
The real word missing from Amazon's adaptation is sincerity. If they sincerely tried to be faithful to Tolkien's works, or at least tried to adapt it in good faith, most of us, I reckon, would be far more forgiving towards them. Alas, they saw something that is, effectively, a cultural staple, and tried to milk it in the most shallow way by reducing it to being just another brand.
Yes! The Hobbit was by no means great, it was outright terrible compared to LotR. But ever so often you had those moments where you feel that they all tried. They all wanted to tell another Middle Earth story, and it could have been good if given more development or probably cut into 1 movie. Rings of Power is just a soulless cash grab. Noone here wanted to make anything else than money
Most of you already decided to hate the show seven months before it first aired. And given how many of you revere the Peter Jackson films, I believe most of you don’t care about ‘sincerity’.
I'm 55. When I was a kid, I read The Hobbit 5 times, the Lord of the Rings 7 times, and the Silmarillion 3 times. My 12 grade teacher went to Oxford and was in Professor Tolkiens class. I used to be a Game Master (like a Dungeon Master in D&D) in Middle Earth Role Playing game and would make up adventures in Middle Earth for my friends to play in. I saw the first season. It was total garbage. I'm barely watching the first episode of the second season and i can honestly tell you that I think they learned something. It's much better than last season. I hate wokeness and all that but I love Middle Earth so much that I'm willing to at least give it a chance and its not disappointing me like the first season. I just saw Cirdan the shipwright take the rings in a boat. Just so you know... i used to be upset that they were changing the story... but now in a way I'm glad they did because now I don't know what's going to happen. When the LotR movies came out, yes I knew what was going to happen, but right now, I'm kinda glad that its more of a mystery. I hope it gets better. If not, at least I'll enjoy seeing the graphics of the world I enjoyed as a kid!
5:11 "what is beauty when it is born in part of evil?" "No less beautiful." That literally sounds like something Morgoth or Sauron would say to justify their actions.
It's true. Let's take your average fairy tale. Its beauty often lies in addressing some aspect of our fallen world. There's an evil queen, a murder, or something of abject horror that births the conflict. However, the story is no less beautiful for the evil that, in part, births the story. I think the scene actually gets to one possible interpretation of a line in the Silmarillion from Manwe: "Thus even as Eru spoke to us shall beauty not before conceived be brought into Eä, and evil yet be good to have been." In this, he speaks of the evil of Feanor's Oath and his pride, but acknowledges that great beauty will come out of that evil. The whole conversation between Elrond and Cirdan is wonderfully Tolkien-esque.
@@5quepasaI think what that means is that even though evil exists, an equal or greater good would come from it, so ultimately the evil would be defeated. That’s different than saying “well the story has to exist, therefore orcs are beautiful”. Eru had a plan even though there was evil. But that doesn’t make Eru evil. You see how you’d be looping all the characters into each being beautiful, good, AND evil? That doesn’t fit with Tolkien’s worldview.
@@rafiki1017 No, I don’t see that at all. All that I’m pointing out here is that, in the story of creation, just because somewhere along that chain of efficient causes exists some evil does not mean that the subsequent effects must therefore be evil. And the Oath of Feanor is quite evil, valuing a trio of rocks over the lives of any who hold it, and a cause of many good things, like the sailing of Earendil to Valinor. If we do call any product of evil “evil”, we would have to say that any child of sexual assault is an evil abomination that must be destroyed, which is absurd. It’s an innocent child. In Tolkien’s worldview he understood that Eru had to give man free will, in short, the ability to obey or disobey and act against the good; otherwise, we would just be slaves, and slaves cannot truly love. What resulted is that man and elf disobeyed and much evil, and good and many beautiful stories, resulted. Similarly, while Sauron is a cause of the three ring’s coming into being, though not a proximate cause - even in the original histories, it is Sauron’s knowledge that helps the elves to make the 22 rings, but Celebrimbor forges the three without his knowledge - the rings themselves, in their essence, are not evil but good.
@@5quepasa ...so it's OK to commit sexual assault because it results in innocent children? Buddy, you are extremely ill in the morals department. Yes I know that's not what you said but when you start getting flexible with the morals, the morals start to flex. But most importantly, this is TOLKIEN, and Tolkien was CATHOLIC. By Catholic understanding of morality, "because somewhere along that chain of efficient causes exists some evil does ABSOLUTELY mean that the subsequent effects must therefore be evil". And Tolkien absolutely wrote this disposition into everything he wrote. It's the WHOLE POINT OF THE STORY; you can't use The One Ring for good, there's no way - you get corrupted and destroyed. Everything that has evil in it, in Tolkien's world, IS evil or inevitably turns evil. Now as an atheist, I could spend a day explaining how this means the evil will always catch up, no matter what. But I won't. We could also philosophise about how correct is this; about percentages of fatherless children of rapists turning criminal and about how awesome the USA for example is for being founded on slavery and STILL having issues with that OR whether the Third Reich would have resulted in heaven on Earth all day long BUT... we shouldn't. Because the simple fact that TOLKIEN'S ETHOS WAS CATHOLIC should be enough as an ad hominem if you're adapting Tolkien's work. That's that, there's the respect. If you're adapting his work, USE HIS PHILOSOPHY. QED. Done. Finished. I have no problem with YOUR philosophy (I love me some sickage); MY point is, Tolkien's philosophy ONLY has room in Tolkien's work. Wanna splurge out your philosophy? Write a story about a King using prima nocte and raping all the villagers only to seed the best most goodest awesometacular heir ever who defeats his rightful sons (greedy, evil, spoilt) and leads the Kingdom and Common Man to glory? Be my guest, just do it OUTSIDE of Tolkien. Write your own story. Just write YOUR OWN STORY. These people have to STOP "updating for modern ____________". Just write their own stories is all we're saying. I don't want Mein Kampf re-written with modern sensibilities either. Just leave it be, leave all of the historical writings be, and WRITE. Your. OWN. Stories.
@5quepasa As a Christian, this idea that beings have a will that is free is a bit of a hoax. We are always subverted by something, even our own desires. We do things we would never want to do because we are finite and think in finite capacities. Apart from any power or strength in an infinite capacity, every single one of us will seek to benefit themselves in finite, most likely irreverent, ways.
"A smart writer has sometimes a hard time writing stupid characters, because they cant imagine the stupidity of some people. But stupid writers cant even fathom the thoughts of smart characters and are therefore incapable of writing those at all."
I feel like there should be a third part. " A great writer can condescend to understand the thoughts of a fool because he understands them, having been a fool at one point."
@CallMeTeci There are plenty of smart stories that aren't great. Overcomplexity and narratively rich stories that fail to deliver themselves well exist. A great writer can write common shortcomings and stupidity very well. A smart writer who can't write dumb characters is like a toaster that can only burn toast. Its one side of an extreme, not the better side of a coin.
@@xavierthomas5835I honestly dont get what you are trying to debate right now and what anyone defines as "great" is beyond vague. Like a less cognitively capable person would not be able to write good stories. Thats bullshit. Both can be "great" writers, just for different audiences and in different genres. But a smart person at least has the potential to write a dumb character, while it doesnt work the other way around. Thats the only thing im saying. If they do in the end stands on another paper. Honestly people like you, that make up some strawmans to debate something another person has never said, are really exhausting.
Gandalf: "the only way to defeat Sauron is to journey to Mordor and cast the one ring into the fiery mountain where it was made." Aragorn: "Or we could get some orcs to shank him when he's not looking, I hear that's worked in the past?" Gandalf: "Oh, forgot about that. But how do we get the orcs on side, aren't they creations of utter evil completely loyal to their dark master?" Aragorn: "Not at all, orcs are just like us, they have families, feelings and relationships. I'll promise them that once I am king of Gondor, I'll fund free governmental childcare places, with priority given to orc families with small children, that way they'll be lining up to back stab Sauron!" Gandalf: "Oh, and there was me thinking we'd need an epic quest undertaken by hobbits full of heroism, friendship and sacrifice!" Aragorn: "No, just remind everyone to check their elf-privilege and of the importance of social justice and the voices of minorities! Speaking of which, Arwen? You are king now! If anyone wants me I'll be standing in the back looking useless!"
The show writers really counted on the audience totally forgetting everything that happened in the 1st season so they could get away with total inconsistency. And you know what? They're absolutely right. I remember very little of the last season.
Honestly, the idea of Orcs having families and babies seems like something George RR Martin would come up with, considering one of his critiques was that "did Aragon have a policy of slaughter and 'slaughter orc babies."
The idea of 'Orc baby wat do?' could be good to explore, but it doesn't work with Tolkien's work. The Orcs work as corrupted creatures of evil, its a world that is more black and white than our own. The narrative is undermined if you have to stop and think about the thousands of Orc families Legolas ruins when he drops a 100 foot ladder on the crowd of raging Uruks.
I think the problem is that galadriel is not even written as main character material in the lore. She is one of the wisest and powerful but she is more of a background character that especially in the first and second age doesn't really play a big role.
LOL! The rings are actually in the title and they still mostly look like kids lollypop rings from the 90s. What a disgrace. I was sick on the couch at home when the first series came about. And for the first 2 episodes it was not that hard to try and overlook the issues right after Galadriel threw herself from the ship into the water I started laughing out loud and closed that abomination.
I had my friend tell me with complete honesty that he preferred the RoP to the movies. I had a moment of serious consideration of our friendship and his mental health.
Did you ever stop to think maybe you are tye problem? 😹 You clowns are hating on this mindlessly The show isn't quite as bad (better than season 1 and HoTD) Also if you were not kidding about your comment then you definitely are the issue
As far as I remember, precisely the fact that the orcs have an unchangeable nature and that their sole purpose is to do war, is a testament of how evil and corrosive is Morgoth/Sauron's power. At this point they can show Shelob being fierce because she's a poor mother from a bad neighborhood trying to feed her offspring
I don’t think Melkor initially even ‘created’ them for war. He bred them as a mockery of the Children of Iluvatar, since he’s unable to create new life himself. Then he decided they were useful for war, but I think this is mostly a byproduct.
Well they showed Shelob as a sexy woman in Shadow of Mordor/Shadow of War, despite it never being mentioned anywhere in the Legendarium(as far as I can recall) that she could shapeshift into a beautiful form.
@@user-bz9of6tn6l Shadow of war is a pretty fun and harmless fan fiction tbh. While it does takes some liberties it still respects the tolkien's world and basically annhilate it's own impact on the lore by the end of it. While ROP doesn't respect tolkiens world at all and try to rewrite as much as possible and changes the lore very heavily.
Here's something that occurred to me about the allure of the elven rings, as you described it (I haven't watched the show): the ornate, bejeweled rings are supposedly so beautiful that they can't be resisted, and they have a pull similar to the One Ring because of that; but that's so hard to suspend your disbelief about (especially when they're bouncing around like physics objects in a PS2 game, but I digress). Mere beauty doesn't corrode the will like that, especially to lead someone towards wrongdoing. It's far more impressive that the actual One Ring is a simple golden band that exerts the tempting power it does; the shots in Jackson's trilogy where the Ring kinda just stares back at the camera are absolutely magnetic, and even without the sound design, you can tell this ordinary-seeming object is far more than that.
jackson is such a genius of scene framing. he made everything look exactly as it should, from hobbits to the ring. you're right, in every scene the ring is in, even without sound design, you just feel the weight and presence of the ring. it's perfect. the perfect trilogy.
Exactly. Peter Jackson employed fine craftsmen and jewellers to create Galadriel's ring and various sized versions of the one ring. They made these beautifully and the lighting Jackson used further highlighted this and gave them a sense of uniqueness. By contrast in RoP the eleven rings look cheap, akin to toys children get for 50 cents via those lucky dips outside grocery stores.
The people who worked on the Lord of the Rings movies really wanted to avoid putting their own political ideas into them and really wanted to pay tribute to the late great Professor JRR Tolkien. I haven’t seen the show, but it seems like the guys who are working on Rings of Power want to do the opposite of that, which is a real shame.
it's not even the politics... they just never even read the lord of the rings, much less the rest of Tolkien's works, and it shows. They just went with the "esthetic" of the lotr movies, with no attention paid to the original material that made that esthetic stand out and feel alive. It's just another trashy cash grab, like most remakes.
It is not that "it seems like," they explicitly said they were going to put their own political ideas into the project: "It felt only natural to us that an adaptation of the author's work would reflect what the world actually looks like." But the problem goes beyond that because they haven't even done that right, things happen randomly just to move the plot forward, as Samwise said, there's no theme, nothing to hold the elements together, just random elements put together.
I think, the same way a less intelligent person would struggle to write a story with masterminds, people who seldom contemplate, or disregard personal responsibility and morality, can’t write moral characters well.
I've said it before and I'll say it again: Out of every mistake and stupid decisions the writers made, turning Sauron into a sympathetic villain was far and away the most egregious.
Sympathetic yes. But damn how I wanted a charming and charismatic Annatar. Someone like Lee pace could have pulled it off. Someone entirely selfish and corrupted but outwardly attractive and knowledgeable just like real life villains who turn people to their own ends
@@Binkbinkson A _good_ writer might actually pull both - Sauron perhaps trying at first, more or less honestly, to indeed atone, as he had claimed to Ëonwë, but the lure of charming people to do as he wanted and falling back to his old ways while actually corrupting himself even more and more might have been a real treat to watch.
Well, after Morgoth was defeated Sauron went to Eonwe and asked for forgiveness: he may truly have felt regret. But when Eonwe said he needed to go to Aman for judgment, Sauron fled east out of pride. And Sauron likely didn’t see himself as evil. The Valar were poor stewards and had effectively abandoned Middle-Earth to its fate, so he probably wanted to ‘bring order’ (under his rule). Of course I don’t expect movie fans to have actually read the books.
If those ppl made a movie about the Soviet Union under Stalin, they'd try to make him a sympathetic ruler and a loving father and family man. Why should this surprise you?
I agree with this. The themes are so muddled that I wasnt sure what they were trying to get me to think. Only that good and evil are seemingly subjective, but then immediately the writers contradict themselves. They're not nuanced discussions, theyre confused signals. It's insignificant noise.
Yep, that would be because they're not trying to get you to think anything beyond "ooh, that looks nice". This is a product. It's just content. Nothing more.
@@master_samwise It felt just like a Marvel movie: no conviction & all spectacle. Dead in the heart. And that's just it. Tolkien's work is personal, alive and spiritual. Amazon, a corporation, CAN'T understand those things. It's not alive. Neither is it a passion project to the people under it. That's what makes the Jackson adaptation different, why it felt alive, because the people who made it had heart & conviction.
Also the opening scene of S2E1 absolutely retcons and contradicts the beginning of season 1. Supposedly Sauron in his cool armor form dominated the orcs and waged a huge war where Finrod died and triggered Galadriel’s John wick arc. But now we know that Sauron was killed (his bodily form) by the orc mutiny and Adar and spent, potentially, centuries in goo form? Which one is it? When did Sauron wage war? In both scenarios they start by saying this is just after Morgoth’s downfall at the dawn of the second age so wtf bro Edit: spelling mistakes
Great point! Not only has this show nothing to do with what JRRT actually wrote, even if you pretend it’s a new fantasy show in a new universe it’s totally internally inconsistent. Crap pacing, crap dialogue, crap world building, crap characters, crap, crap, crap and more crap!!
You are so right! I had also forgotten about it, but I can tell you that even though I liked the "idea" of showing a flashback about the time Adar "killed" Sauron (this was mentioned in season 1, so I was curious), there was something that felt odd (not only the contradiction you just called out) but everything felt too quick and too much "in your face": Sauron speaking to the orcs, one orc going rogue, and then Sauron stabbing the orc like 30 times in front of all the others, what was genuinely going to happen? the orcs stabbing him like 100 times... it was too obvious, though the idea was promising, on paper.
Absolutely true. Another thing I am confused about is they are now calling the silly Mordor map symbol, the mark of Adar. I thought it was made by Sauron as a "back up plan" or whatever. Sauron even puts the mark on Finrods body (for absolutely no reason). Unless I missed something. Same as Adar being defeated and all orcs killed in the southlands in s1 but now claiming that he was victorious and somehow has a full orc army again. Could claim he is lying to cover a defeat here but certainly didn't come across that way.
0:26 We don't wanna go to war today, but the lord of the land says nay nay nay! We're gonna march all day all day all day! Where there's a whip there's a way!
You basically said everything I wanted to say. But the one smaller thing that continues to annoy me almost as much as the lore butchery is the way all the characters pronounce names. Why does *everyone* roll their freaking Rs? That is rhetorical, of course. I know they made the actors do it because they think it makes them sound more posh but it just comes off sounding pretentious.
This review helped to crystallize a thought for me: Rings of Power is a self-insert fantasy depiction of women who think things like ... "I can fix him!" "I'm strong enough to deal with his mistreatment and bad behavior!" and/or "I had no idea he was evil, despite all of his obvious red flags! There was no possible way I could have known! (Also I will definitely forgive him in an instant if only he shows me a kernel of attention.)" Not all women are like that! But some of them are, and I can clearly picture them choosing this version of Galadriel as their poster girl and onscreen "representation."
@@Eilonwy95 I hope you're right! I just don't trust the writers to *not* depict her forgiving him, thinking (as the type of woman I'm talking about is wont to do), "sure, he is the Dark Lord who slaughtered many innocents including at least one person I loved ... but when I knew him as Halbrand, I thought he was really nice, *and* he's so very cute! I should remember the good times we had and give him another chance!!" (To anyone reading this who might find themselves in a similar situation: please value yourself and do not give that person another chance.)
@@joywagner979 I could be wrong, but I think that is very unlikely. I think she was only slightly interested when she didn’t know he was Sauron. I haven’t seen anything to suggest she is at all the forgiving type.
Thats one of the worst reviews I have ever seen tbh. Not one second did a thought like that cross my mind. Its weird to instantly attack the Show because hmm women
Hey Master! Love your stuff! You asked what the theme of the show is, and I think I have an answer: pride and good intentions are no substitute for virtuous deeds. Galadriel is arrogant and selfishly motivated by revenge, and plays right into Sauron’s hands. Cirdan is so confident in his own wisdom that he does exactly what Gandalf warned about, taking the ring out of a “desire to do good”. Celebrimbor expressed a vain desire to craft something to rival the silmarils in S1, and that vanity makes him incredibly gullible to a being that tells him everything he wants to hear (lifted straight out of the Screwtape Letters). Meanwhile Elendil’s made-up daughter pulls a quintessential zoomer move and rebells against her father’s tradition and plays a key role in starting Númenor’s downfall. Even the seriously weird orc thing fits this theme, as the orc idea of “freedom” is about conquering and enslaving humans. I’m definitely not saying this show is a secret masterpiece, but as I’ve started to notice this trend I’m starting to give it a little more of the benefit of the doubt.
It annoys me so much when people say “It’s just a TV show.” It isn’t - the Lord of the Rings is a piece of cultural heritage that influenced and inspired millions of people and still does to this day. Culture MATTERS. Break down a society’s culture, break down that society. That’s why people get furious at this.
All of the homages given to Peter Jacksons work would of worked if it complimented good writing, story telling, and world building , but instead it looks like someones fan fiction. Compare the "best scenes of the show" to a simple scene in GOT season 1, with Ned Stark asking questions in the blacksmith shop, and you are more invested in the blacksmith shop scene compared to any scene in ROP.
The problem is they're writing the characters as if they are humans, but most of the characters in the show AREN'T HUMANS, and while they might have similarities, they don't think like humans do. They didn't have to strictly follow lore to make the elves interesting. They just had to use their imaginations along the lines of the lore.
I have been waiting for this video! As a lover of Tolkien’s work, I am so excited to watch! By the way, could you consider looking into character vices/virtues in the Hunger Games series? Curious as to your thoughts when characters who live in such an oppressive society that can still show virtues even in such grave circumstances.
The truly sad thing about this show is that it will be the introduction to Tolkien’s world for many people, and they will form a mental image of what he wrote based on it. Such that even if they eventually read the books their impressions will forever be tarnished by this fetid turd.
Just as it happened with the Star Wars sequels, I see some little girls dressed up as Rey and I can't help to get a bittersweet feeling. What can we do? If you have children, introduce them to the right entries of stories or movies, I already watched the original Star Wars movie (1977) with my child, a simple act in the hope she can grow up recognizing good stories from bad ones.
@@luisrods The Anakin character and actor was hated by Many on his introduction. Look at him now... Also yes I agree Rey might not be as great of a character but she earned her way up just like the other Jedi She was also trained by the best, Luke Skywalker
The people making ROP hate Tolkien. They think the books are racist, sexist, and antiquated. They are remaking it to fit a modern ideology. None of this is accidental, bad writing, or misunderstanding.
The thing is there IS racism and sexism in LOTR. Elrond was a racist jerk. Eowyn is constantly being told to stay put and look after the weak like a good lady. It's throughout the story and founded on solid points (Elrond looks down on Men because he literally saw a Man choose power over freeing the people of Middle-Earth), but the whole point of LOTR is that everyone is forced to rise above those traditions and prejudices in order to save the world. They prove themselves wrong, change their minds, and everyone grows for the better. RoP is offended that those flaws would even exist in the first place and over-corrects to the point that the message is lost, and the story suffers.
the racial representation is just ridiculous... as an asian homosexual, I don't feel represented in RoP... all I get is constant cringe watching asian elves and hobbits...it's like watching a chinese man wearing poncho and sombrero holding burrito while curling his mustache singing Despacito with his guitarron🤦♀️🤦♀️
@@LaffeeTaffeeGGElrond is anything but a racist in the books but even if he was, he still tolerated dwarven presence in Rivendell, as Durin III had in the Appendices had attacked Sauron’s army from behind. As for Eowyn, so what? What was so wrong what was told to her? Is looking after the weak less of a noble thing than warfare? Edited: She was not put down in the books, she was willing to take her people to Dunharrow. It wasn’t forced on her, in fact, the Rohirrim put their trust only in the House of Eorl but Theoden couldn’t spare Eomer to lead the people away to Dunharrow.
@LaffeeTaffeeGG Reminds me of how modern storytellers don't want Sokka from Avatar:The Last Airbender to be sexist. Even though he overcomes it as part of A CHARACTER ARC.
Guyladriel would easily fall for Sauron's mind games again. Guyladriel is a moron. In contrast, Galadriel would see right through him. Guyladriel is not and never will be Galadriel.
Something that made me cringe was the stranger saying to nori, [it’s not odd for a harfoot to miss home] This is clearly an attempt to mirror the hobbits missing the shire, but A) the stranger just got there, it doesn’t seem like anyone knows about harfoots, but he, who just rode in on a meteor, acts like it’s common knowledge And B) harfoots don’t have a f*%ing home Hollow attempt at recognition
Only halway through your video but you've mentioned something that's really resonated with me. The show's inability to clearly define the difference between Good and Evil. The reason they need peace-loving orc families and unwise elves. These people spent $1B for the bragging rights of saying "We're making Tolkien better."; "Our CGI is the most cutting edge." It's Amazon! Can a bunch of rapacious materialists produce anything that suggests Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely? Are venal producers even capable of seeing subtlety and nuance?
When I saw this pop up in my recommended I thought it was more rage-bait. Then I saw what channel uploaded it and I went "ooooh" That bad huh : / I was hopeful for a redemption arc
Such an odd route for a lotr based show to go. Where are the grand themes of good vs evil? The inspirational characters? RoP is just a bunch of nothing.
@@reek4062 Interesting. Can you give some examples? I know the good guys struggle to do what is right at times, but the villains are pretty straight up evil.
@Eilonwy95 The Valar have good intentions, but are poor guardians and clearly showed their preferences . They invited the Elves to Aman, both to protect them and for their own pleasure, but by doing this they left Middle-Earth and Men on their own, to be corrupted by Melkor. After Morgoth was defeated (for the second time), the Valar gave the Edain extended lifespans, great powers and even their own island relatively close to Aman. But by doing this they both disenfranchised the other Men of Middle-Earth, leaving them to be dominated by Sauron, and planted the seeds for the Darkening of Numenor. After Miriel died, Finwe remarried (which Elves normally did not do) and had children with his new wife: there was a lot of friction between Feanor and his half-brothers. Thorin (and many Dwarves) were greedy. Sam bullied Sméagol, possibly stopping his relapse on the Stairs of Cirith Ungol. And I must mention Helm Hammerhand. In the book he punched Freca, killing him. But Freca had been summoned at Edoras for a council and had not physically attacked him, though he behaved arrogant and made verbal threats. So the following war with Wulf is grey. (Of course Philippa Boyens screws this up.)
@@reek4062 Wasn't Helm Hammerhand also said to eat men during the long siege of the Hornburg? Tolkien was certainly not simplistic, the show just does its own complexity poorly.
I find it hilarious that in the show Celebrimbor just knows to make two masculine rings and one dainty feminine one that just happens to choose Galadriel. The design choice would make so much more sense if the bearers of the rings were known before the rings were crafted for them
Spot On! The 3 Elven rings WERE NOT touched by Sauron’s evil. That’s precisely why after he lost the 1 ring at the end of the 2nd age that Gandalf, Galadriel and Elrond could use them to preserve and protect Lothlorien, and Rivendell, And Gandalf could use his ring to inspire others. Amazon has gone from ignoring the lore to outright subverting it. F these guys!
Thank you for addressing the Círdan part! When he said Manwë instead of Ulmo i was like wait.... and then the part where the 3 overcome him...But but but they're not corrupted....so what....why...why this whole part when everyone knows already...the one hasnt even been made yet....
Ok so yes amazon did this wrong, but the letters of tolkien do include an idea that there are parts of their culture that may be good or ordinary. There would be orc babies. I know we see uruk-hai born from the earth but tolkien would not right that. He in fact made it a point not to right that for the dwarves. We can assume that orcs bread much like men or Amy other of the races of middle earth. Only it's probably closer to what is seen in a show like goblin slayer than the living family we get here.
Tolkien fought in one of the worst wars in history a war where there was little justification for its start and decided that objective good and objective evil were real and that good and love is worth fighting for. These “writers” got insulted on Reddit once and decided that morals are non existent and evil isn’t objective. Who thought this was a good idea
Just returned to playing Shadow of War, like yeah it's terrible fanfiction but at least creators were never so smug with it and never said it was "Far better than anything Tolkien ever wrote"
And I feel like with that, it kinda did the same thing the movies did. It changed things from Tolkien, but did it in a way that somewhat still respeced Tolkien's lore. I mean the main things that they changed were Elves staying spirits, which kinda works since you have the Nazgul; the years of everything, which in the end doesn't change a ton; and the Shelob thing, which at least makes some sense with her being descended from Ungoliant. Sure it's still fanfiction, but it doesn't do it in a way that just disrespects all of Tolkien's works and I always felt it kept some themes, especially of sacrifice
Shadow of Mordor/War are pretty far from "terrible fanfiction". They manage to keep to the core themes of his work while retaining a cast of interesting and developing characters. Are they as good as Tolkien's work? Definitely not, but they are incredible stories in their own right.
@@ebonslayer3321 I love them, but they definitely change a lot of things and make some weird choices, so I get where the OP is coming from with "terrible fanfiction". And by that I'm guessing he means how it almost doesn't try hard to follow the lore sometimes
@@Keram-io8hv Using someone else's words to add onto it, Shadow of Mordor/War would make Tolkien roll in his grave. ROP would make him spin like a top, lol
I think Rings of Power can be summed up by this line from Shakespeare's Macbeth: 'Tis a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
Thank you for making this, these people don't get it. Those of us that have put our time in (Tolkien freak since 1991) don't appreciate the egregious mis-handling of something so wonderful, so flawless. I used to daydream about a movie being made someday, who would be in it & how they would adapt it. When I went to f'ing prison in '99 thru '01 , the first thing I did when I finally got to my camp, was hit the library looking for Tolkien & they had the WHOLE trilogy. They even had some Dragonlance too. Needless to say I checked them out & read them over and over, nobody else wanted them-half of them were illiterate😅😅
Amazon’s biggest sin was their dishonest marketing. This was never going to be an adaptation of Tolkien’s work. It’s a reimagining, an Amazon-original story based very loosely off Tolkien’s writing concerning the Second Age, and is focused solely on telling the kind of “inclusive” story Amazon’s executives want to tell. They don’t have the rights to the actual detailed info on the Second Age, so they had to make up 90-95% of what’s on screen. Had Amazon admitted this up front, instead of gaslighting everyone, maybe there would’ve been less backlash.
The backlash is *mainly* coming from fans of the Peter Jackson films and culture war vultures. Admittedly, many Tolkien fans *rightfully* hate the show, but they form a small minority of the backlash. LotR contains a fair amount of information about the Second Age, but the showrunners decided that the brand name was enough and discarded it.
@@reek4062does it matter? even a layman can tell you this tv show is an abomination. knowing the lore is pretty far down the list, when one just wants to be entertained.
@@crazyralph6386 Yes, it does actually matter quite a bit that a sizeable portion of the outrage comes from the exact corrupting force (culture war grifters big and small simply _are_ an appendage of it) Tolkien hated enough to make it the big bad of an entire mythology.
New subscriber here! Great video! I found you by watching RoP reviews because I was so disappointed with their depiction of Galadriel and how there's no semblance of herself from the books. They made the elves naive! Smh... 🤦♀️ You made me see even more silly bits that don't make sense! Lol There were ao many parts I looked past, butttt when they MADE THE RINGS IN THE WRONG ORDER AND THEN MADE EVERYTHING ELSE GO AROUND THAT, giant issue, I wanted to throw myself off Mt. Doom!! 😂😂😂😂
A bit of info on the orcs : According to the late book "Morgoth's Ring" (1993 I believe, so published by Tolkien's son) and The Silmarillion, Orcs can breed, have feelings and can live without a master. They also understand concept of right/wrong, good and evil, camaradery and a have some sens of humour. They're evil, but in one of his essay the professor tried to go into the grey area, like nothing is really bad (evil) in the beginning, even Sauron (Mairon) wasn't. Only Melkor could have been ? Though clumsy, the amazon series (as an adaptation of his work) is technically lore accurate on this, because the canon is too complex to just be LOTR. Tolkien made too much add-ons with the essays, new stories or even letters.
Portraying an orc as a caring father isn't lore accurate. Not at all. Nor is showing them wanting to live in peace. Refusing to go to a war in which they'll have to fight hard against dangerous foes? Yes, I would have no issue with that. But that would only be because they would prefer to oppress, pillage and kill easy preys.
I don't think the problem of showing an orc family (with crying baby and all) is the actual problem, for each thing they have made right to the complex canon of the Tolkien universe, they have made multiple others quite wrong. The real problem is that this element (and others, like characters recalling Beleriand) appear in a vacuum, inside an already misguided story. What is the role the orcs are going to play ultimately in the end? In the story, they are not tragic figures like Gollum was; they will be only the obstacle, the enemy, and the threat in the great journeys of all the main characters of Tolkien's work. That Adar shows love for the orcs, does not mean they have to show them as a human refugee family, they could have shown them breeding from the ground and still would make sense that Adar felt love for them, the writers show them like they did mostly because they couldn't think of any other way to convey empathy. In the end, it's merely bad writing.
The show isn't lore accurate on this matter. The orcs aren't in a grey area between good and evil. And even if nothing was evil at their beginning, the orcs are evil in the Second Age. Would you argue that Morgoth is in the grey area during the First Age? I don't think so. Also even if Tolkien had his own doubts about the orcs as a purely evil and irredeemable race, that is still how they are portrayed in the lore, especially in the published texts, which the show is supposedly adapting. Tolkien couldn't change that without having to rewrite pretty much all of it.
It's just occurred to me that Guy Gavriel Kay is still alive. In fact he's not yet 70, and he helped compile the Silmarillion, and he's an established fantasy author with a great track record. Amazon could have paid him $10M to write this and it would have made only the smallest dent in the budget. Imagine what we could have had. (That's assuming he didn't just say "I'm not touching that".)
So cathartic to hear you point out all this! The only logical conclusion is that in the end, after Sauron has crafted the one ring and the Elves learn of the depth of his deception, they do discard the three original, corrupted rings and have Celebrimbor create three new ones in secret without Sauron's knowledge. Which is an absolutely harebrained way to tell the story, but the only one that makes sense of the way the rings are presented here.
I mean technically when Meklor looses the second time... Sauron does turn good (Everything turned from Meklors path)... And Tolkien intentionally left it vague when he became evil again only making it definitive after the One Ring is forged. Possibly meaning the other rings he made with Celebrimbor weren't intended originally to be ultimately controlled by him.
Peter Jackson's adaptation was always a "Terminator 3" to the original. I just fail to accept so many fans consider it the 'classical adaptation'. RoP was the first film to at least try and capture the deeper layer of Tolkien's works. And they at least wrote something new instead of just following the book and throwing important stuff away like Peter Jackson did. They tried into aesthetics, they tried into psychology, they tried into re-inventing the world and characters.
Orcs were never mindless evil drones... they are violent and aggressive by nature and design, but we see them running from fights all the time, plus they "multiply after the manner of the other children of Illuvitar", so yeah, orc-babies, as weird as it sounds
Oh yeah, orc-babies exist. But the loving nuclear family unit shown in RoP seems completely contradictory to, you know, orc nature. They are inherently violent; that's just how they were made.
@@master_samwise Someone still has to care for the young I'd reckon, but in the end who's to say what we saw is a nuclear family like the ones we imagine ? Maybe they don't have specific parental attachment and let some orcs care for all the littles ones or something. And even if it was, what is so wrong it ? What I liked about the scene was that they still snarl and growl aggressively at each other in place of having real affection, imo it's like they do have the feeling deep in them from their elf side, but the corruption is so strong that they can't understand or express it without resulting to violence. I think it's fitting !
@@master_samwise sadly, there's plenty of violent nuclear families in the real world, if they do have couples like humans and elves they still probably beat the life out of each other constantly because that's just their nature
@@master_samwise Maybe they reproduce asexually which would mean they practically clone themselves. Tolkien wouldn't have written it that way, but he wasn't quite specific on it.
I actually like this show sincerely, despite straying from the supposed faithful 1-dimensional depiction of good vs evil. For the record, I have read LOTR & enjoyed all the Peter Jackson films.
As soon as they chose moral relativism, this show was doomed to failure. Sauron should not be depicted as a Middle-earth version of Walter White just because a descendant of JRRT thought it might be cool - allegedly. Sauron is the equivalent of a fallen angel and is beyond redemption. He should not be depicted as someone which whom one is expected to empathise. The incredibly bad writing is just the icing on the cake.
I think you're all being very unreasonable. High District Manager Gil'Gadaddy did an amazing job and Guyladriel is one of the best representations of this character from this beloved series I have ever seen.
Ma boi Círdan, what have they done with him ?! :-( Anyway, thank you for this review. A proper, reasoned and reasonable review, rather than just a volley of insults, like most YTers opt for.
Orcs were evil beings, they weren’t misunderstood family men who struggled to leave their families behind!! Tolkien went into great detail explaining all his characters and never once wrote that Orcs had family units. Evil existed in Tolkiens world, just as it exists in ours today!
We need to talk about the horse on fire (S1:E7). Anyway, de-villainizing the evil is an utter disgrace. Sauron is a demi-god, Lord of Darkness. He needs to be awesome, scary, insidious, and menacing, not a floopy black spaghetti monster or a dumb human. This turns him into an MCU shaper-shifter. Not cool.
They didn’t have the rights to adapt the story Tolkien wrote so they made most of it up. And because of that, they shouldn’t have fucking made it in the first place! 🤬
If someone told me to write a story set in this time and I was allowed to use the Numenorians, the fall of Numenor, the forging of the rings and so on.. There are loads of places you could go with those allowances. I can just have Numenorians colonize/settle Middle Earth. The entire series could just be about that. Numenorians having to deal with the lesser Men, the rowing bands of Orcs left behind by Morgoth and so on. Present as little as possible about the Forging of the Rings to the viewer and the Elves in general, because they are best left as a mystery that slowly unveils itself as the story unfolds. In season 2 the fall of Eregion happens, but again its not the main point of that season. It's just a side dish. You get to the half-way point in like season 3-4 where the Fall of Numenor occurs and you're left with Elendil, Isildur and Anarion trying to figure out what to do now that the fatherland is gone. Then it's season 5 that it all culminates into events that will lead up to the where the Lord of the Rings begin, e.g. the Last Alliance.
Sauron, one of the most powerful maiar to ever walk middle earth, Morgoth's chief lieutenant, reputed to be one of the most cunning being of middle earth, who required the last alliance of men and elves to finally get defeated by a lucky strike to his only weak point thrown by Isildur as a last resort, get fooled by an orc and turn to goo after getting hit by a crown... That's blasphemy.
What's amazing is that we already have a model for a *great* Celebrimbor. The Shadow of Mordor games portray his hubris and tragedy in such vivid detail. The grandma of a man playing him does the character no justice.
It's not just that this show has no themes, it's that the themes it does have are as antithetical as it is possible to be to the universal themes of honor, love, loyalty, and self-sacrifice found throughout Tolkien's Middle-earth writings. The Three Rings being objects of such desire and having such dominating power over the hearts and wills of other beings is, as you said, EXACTLY THE ONE SPECIFIC PURPOSE FOR WHICH THE GOD OF EVIL FORGED THE ONE RING, THE GREATEST AND MOST EVIL WEAPON OF WORLD DESTRUCTION THAT MIDDLE-EARTH HAD EVER SEEN. For the showrunners to make this change, they would have to 1) fully understand the original theme and purpose of the characterization of the Three, and 2) be fully willing to flip that entire storytelling construct on its head and try to push the exact opposite ideas as the truth. This change wasn't made out of petty garden-variety ignorance - you can't be this specific and thorough about reversing an existing idea into its exact mirror inversion unless you grasp the actual nature of its original form in the first place. To me, that's not incompetence on the writers' part, that's outright malevolence seasoned with hearty helpings of arrogance and bitterness.
There totally were orc women, and orc babies. Orcs were true, living things, and they reproduced in the same manner as all other thinking races. And there were plenty of orcs who weren't keen on the idea of going to war even during the War of the Ring, when Sauron's hold on their wills was so strong that his destruction sent many of them completely insane. _However,_ I highly doubt that orc family dynamics were particularly pleasant (I personally suspect that the mightiest orcs probably kept the... "use" of the orc women for themselves, and that those women were _not_ treated very decently at all). And orcs didn't want to go to war because war required discipline and working together with lots of other people they didn't like to achieve a common goal, and was just a lot harder and more dangerous than simple brigandage.
@@master_samwise The comment was a bit confuse and it’s been a while since i finished the Silmarillion but if i record correct Sauron was first defeated when he took the werewolf form and he is defeated by Huan once that happens he takes a form of vampire. After Morgoth is defeated Sauron apparently “repents “ and he is not taken by Eönwë to valinor for judgment i don’t remember exactly if he was not willing to go or either forced whatever. so after about a 1000 years he comes back regaining power in Mordor Sauron then takes the appearance of the lord of Gifts Annatar since he wanted to control the elves.. after that he goes to war since he was able to use the rings but he is defeated once and returns to mordor Sauron once again disguise as a fair form to corrupt the númenórean leading to their destruction and sauron escapes by spiritual form sorry it my comment was miss leading but that’s what i thought behind it
@@matheusxavier9080 I was joking lol. Making a fake shocked comment about Amazon’s goo-Ron not being accurate to the lore. But I appreciate your in depth response nonetheless!
If someone was given a billion freakin dollars to make a tv series out of events from the silmarillion and still isnt able to create something worth watching then, well, may god have mercy on their soul.
Why is fantasy like Tolkien's Lord of the Rings important anyway? It's not becuase humans need fantasy to make life bearable: "Humans need fantasy to be human." - Sir Terry Pratchett
Why not make crops in the slopes of the Mountain? Khazad dum is the oldest dwarf mansion, but if a dark claudia show up ever1 starves? We could have done a much better job
There's not much "plot" either; from what I've been able to glean from episode reviews (because I refuse to watch the actual show), nothing has happened this season, other than Nori being Nori and all the failures you adroitly pointed out. Cirdan is as laughably written as Elrond and Galadriel. Can't wait to see how Bombadil gets bastardized.
"They write the elves as if they were men." Thank you!! been saying this since season one, the ROP elves are pretty much just men with pointy ears and a philosophy degree. There's nothing convincing about them that tells me they are elves apart from the pointy ears and yet Tolkien made it clear you would never mistake an elf for a human. I watched about half of season 1 and then gave up in disgust, I refuse to acknowledge this show exists as a Tolkien adaption in the same way I refuse to acknowledge season 8 of GOT.
I want to address the commentary on the conversation between Cirdan and Elrond. I think that there is more truth to that scene than you believe. Maybe it's just my Catholic upbringing, but, hey, Tolkien was Catholic, so I may have more insight than you. Let's take your average fairy tale. Its beauty often lies in addressing some aspect of our fallen world. There's an evil queen, a murder, or something of abject horror that births the conflict. However, the story is no less beautiful for the evil that, in part, births the story. I think the scene actually gets to one possible interpretation of a line in the Silmarillion from Manwe: "Thus even as Eru spoke to us shall beauty not before conceived be brought into Eä, and evil yet be good to have been." In this, he speaks of the evil of Feanor's Oath and his pride, but acknowledges that great beauty will come out of that evil. The whole conversation between Elrond and Cirdan is wonderfully Tolkien-esque in its examination of whether good can indeed arise from evil.
“You don’t mess with Tolkien’s legendarium” - Jackson and co sure did 🤔 why do they get a pass? It’s more than just flaws and inaccuracies, there are many things in the movies that are unforgivable. Cue the people saying “get out of here ‘purist’” but if Jackson’s films are held up as a standard that’s just purism with different goalposts.
Which adaptation is worse: Rings of Power or Netflix's Avatar: The Last Airbender?
Both? Both. Both is good
To be fair, Netflix's Avatar had its good points especially Zuko's relationship with his crew. It has good characters minus Sokka. It is WAY EASIER to defend Avatar than RoP. RoP is utter desecration of lore. Avatar had the effort of sticking to the lore albeit not entirely sticking to it.
Well Rings of Power feels like its written that on a fundamental level despise everything Tolkien stands for, Avatar feels like it was written by people that like the show but don't understand nuance and just have an understanding of writing of a 13 year old writing fan fiction for the first time, except the 13 year old might get better and learn from failures.
@@dpolaristar4634 I really appreciate that we're all deferring to being 13 when writing like this is okay. There is definitely a "phase" going on when writers are around that age. Which makes it more remarkable that the "pros" have devolved to that phase the rest of us outgrow.
RoP is the greater failure. AtLA is a worse failure. The man who dies attempting scale Mt. Everest has failed to achieve an immense undertaking while the man who falls to his death from the top of the Grand Canyon failed to walk a much easier path already laid out for him. Both are tragedies, but they hit differently.
Fine-I’ll rewatch the extended Trilogy again.
I dreamed about the Behind-the-scenes last night. Definitely should rewatch it!!
I just started watching them again needed a brain scrub after those episodes.
sounds about right yes, god speed lads
It really never gets old. My 5-year-old has watched the 3 extended editions at least 10 times already & I just never tire of them.
(And yeah, my kid is really weird, she legitimately sat through, not only all of the extended ROTK in one sitting, but also the credits because she likes the music - 4 1/2 hours. 😂)
@@zzevonplant can't say I blame her.
"Commodified fantasy takes no risks: it invents nothing, but imitates and trivializes. It proceeds by depriving the old stories of their intellectual and ethical complexity, turning their action to violence, their actors to dolls, and their truth-telling to sentimental platitude. Heroes brandish their swords, lasers, wands, as mechanically as combine harvesters, reaping profits. Profoundly disturbing moral choices are sanitized, made cute, made safe. The passionately conceived idea of the great storytellers are copied, stereotyped, reduced to toys, molded in bright-colored plastic, advertised, sold, broken, junked, replaceable, interchangeable." -Ursula K. LeGuin
my goodness is that spot on.
thanks for finding this quotation from a master of fantasy! Very apt for the abomination of Tolkein's work that is Rings of Power
@@master_samwise I dont think you would like her, she was a feminist. the anarchist part might vibe with you incels though.
Ursula understood. Such a finely crafted paragraph.
What was done to her book on screen was shameful.
@@uberhuber7903You have Venom as your profile picture. This is the most vile insult I can type down regarding the value of your opinions.
The real word missing from Amazon's adaptation is sincerity. If they sincerely tried to be faithful to Tolkien's works, or at least tried to adapt it in good faith, most of us, I reckon, would be far more forgiving towards them. Alas, they saw something that is, effectively, a cultural staple, and tried to milk it in the most shallow way by reducing it to being just another brand.
My goodness is that ever true.
Yes!
The Hobbit was by no means great, it was outright terrible compared to LotR. But ever so often you had those moments where you feel that they all tried. They all wanted to tell another Middle Earth story, and it could have been good if given more development or probably cut into 1 movie.
Rings of Power is just a soulless cash grab. Noone here wanted to make anything else than money
@@master_samwiseWell said. I’ve screenshotted this. This perfectly describes my feelings. You just put into words feelings I couldn’t describe
Most of you already decided to hate the show seven months before it first aired.
And given how many of you revere the Peter Jackson films, I believe most of you don’t care about ‘sincerity’.
I'm 55. When I was a kid, I read The Hobbit 5 times, the Lord of the Rings 7 times, and the Silmarillion 3 times. My 12 grade teacher went to Oxford and was in Professor Tolkiens class. I used to be a Game Master (like a Dungeon Master in D&D) in Middle Earth Role Playing game and would make up adventures in Middle Earth for my friends to play in. I saw the first season. It was total garbage. I'm barely watching the first episode of the second season and i can honestly tell you that I think they learned something. It's much better than last season. I hate wokeness and all that but I love Middle Earth so much that I'm willing to at least give it a chance and its not disappointing me like the first season. I just saw Cirdan the shipwright take the rings in a boat. Just so you know... i used to be upset that they were changing the story... but now in a way I'm glad they did because now I don't know what's going to happen. When the LotR movies came out, yes I knew what was going to happen, but right now, I'm kinda glad that its more of a mystery. I hope it gets better. If not, at least I'll enjoy seeing the graphics of the world I enjoyed as a kid!
5:11 "what is beauty when it is born in part of evil?"
"No less beautiful."
That literally sounds like something Morgoth or Sauron would say to justify their actions.
It's true. Let's take your average fairy tale. Its beauty often lies in addressing some aspect of our fallen world. There's an evil queen, a murder, or something of abject horror that births the conflict. However, the story is no less beautiful for the evil that, in part, births the story. I think the scene actually gets to one possible interpretation of a line in the Silmarillion from Manwe: "Thus even as Eru spoke to us shall beauty not before conceived be brought into Eä, and evil yet be good to have been." In this, he speaks of the evil of Feanor's Oath and his pride, but acknowledges that great beauty will come out of that evil. The whole conversation between Elrond and Cirdan is wonderfully Tolkien-esque.
@@5quepasaI think what that means is that even though evil exists, an equal or greater good would come from it, so ultimately the evil would be defeated. That’s different than saying “well the story has to exist, therefore orcs are beautiful”. Eru had a plan even though there was evil. But that doesn’t make Eru evil. You see how you’d be looping all the characters into each being beautiful, good, AND evil? That doesn’t fit with Tolkien’s worldview.
@@rafiki1017 No, I don’t see that at all. All that I’m pointing out here is that, in the story of creation, just because somewhere along that chain of efficient causes exists some evil does not mean that the subsequent effects must therefore be evil. And the Oath of Feanor is quite evil, valuing a trio of rocks over the lives of any who hold it, and a cause of many good things, like the sailing of Earendil to Valinor. If we do call any product of evil “evil”, we would have to say that any child of sexual assault is an evil abomination that must be destroyed, which is absurd. It’s an innocent child.
In Tolkien’s worldview he understood that Eru had to give man free will, in short, the ability to obey or disobey and act against the good; otherwise, we would just be slaves, and slaves cannot truly love. What resulted is that man and elf disobeyed and much evil, and good and many beautiful stories, resulted.
Similarly, while Sauron is a cause of the three ring’s coming into being, though not a proximate cause - even in the original histories, it is Sauron’s knowledge that helps the elves to make the 22 rings, but Celebrimbor forges the three without his knowledge - the rings themselves, in their essence, are not evil but good.
@@5quepasa ...so it's OK to commit sexual assault because it results in innocent children?
Buddy, you are extremely ill in the morals department.
Yes I know that's not what you said but when you start getting flexible with the morals, the morals start to flex.
But most importantly, this is TOLKIEN, and Tolkien was CATHOLIC. By Catholic understanding of morality, "because somewhere along that chain of efficient causes exists some evil does ABSOLUTELY mean that the subsequent effects must therefore be evil". And Tolkien absolutely wrote this disposition into everything he wrote. It's the WHOLE POINT OF THE STORY; you can't use The One Ring for good, there's no way - you get corrupted and destroyed. Everything that has evil in it, in Tolkien's world, IS evil or inevitably turns evil.
Now as an atheist, I could spend a day explaining how this means the evil will always catch up, no matter what. But I won't.
We could also philosophise about how correct is this; about percentages of fatherless children of rapists turning criminal and about how awesome the USA for example is for being founded on slavery and STILL having issues with that OR whether the Third Reich would have resulted in heaven on Earth all day long BUT... we shouldn't.
Because the simple fact that TOLKIEN'S ETHOS WAS CATHOLIC should be enough as an ad hominem if you're adapting Tolkien's work. That's that, there's the respect. If you're adapting his work, USE HIS PHILOSOPHY. QED. Done. Finished.
I have no problem with YOUR philosophy (I love me some sickage); MY point is, Tolkien's philosophy ONLY has room in Tolkien's work. Wanna splurge out your philosophy? Write a story about a King using prima nocte and raping all the villagers only to seed the best most goodest awesometacular heir ever who defeats his rightful sons (greedy, evil, spoilt) and leads the Kingdom and Common Man to glory? Be my guest, just do it OUTSIDE of Tolkien. Write your own story. Just write YOUR OWN STORY.
These people have to STOP "updating for modern ____________". Just write their own stories is all we're saying. I don't want Mein Kampf re-written with modern sensibilities either. Just leave it be, leave all of the historical writings be, and WRITE. Your. OWN. Stories.
@5quepasa As a Christian, this idea that beings have a will that is free is a bit of a hoax. We are always subverted by something, even our own desires. We do things we would never want to do because we are finite and think in finite capacities. Apart from any power or strength in an infinite capacity, every single one of us will seek to benefit themselves in finite, most likely irreverent, ways.
I'm glad Tolkien isn't here to witness this total failure
As if it would ever be possible if he were alive
@@chriswest4875 exactly
I believe ROP was written by Trollkien (yes some millennial changeling)
He sees it & he ain't happy.
One of Tolkiens themes is how mortality is a gift. I finally see it.
"A smart writer has sometimes a hard time writing stupid characters, because they cant imagine the stupidity of some people. But stupid writers cant even fathom the thoughts of smart characters and are therefore incapable of writing those at all."
He is spinning so fast in his grave that he has secretly been tapped to power half of the UK.
I feel like there should be a third part. " A great writer can condescend to understand the thoughts of a fool because he understands them, having been a fool at one point."
@@xavierthomas5835 How is that different to a smart writer? How do you think people become smart?
They usually dont get born like this.
@CallMeTeci There are plenty of smart stories that aren't great. Overcomplexity and narratively rich stories that fail to deliver themselves well exist. A great writer can write common shortcomings and stupidity very well. A smart writer who can't write dumb characters is like a toaster that can only burn toast. Its one side of an extreme, not the better side of a coin.
@@xavierthomas5835I honestly dont get what you are trying to debate right now and what anyone defines as "great" is beyond vague.
Like a less cognitively capable person would not be able to write good stories. Thats bullshit. Both can be "great" writers, just for different audiences and in different genres.
But a smart person at least has the potential to write a dumb character, while it doesnt work the other way around. Thats the only thing im saying. If they do in the end stands on another paper.
Honestly people like you, that make up some strawmans to debate something another person has never said, are really exhausting.
Gandalf: "the only way to defeat Sauron is to journey to Mordor and cast the one ring into the fiery mountain where it was made."
Aragorn: "Or we could get some orcs to shank him when he's not looking, I hear that's worked in the past?"
Gandalf: "Oh, forgot about that. But how do we get the orcs on side, aren't they creations of utter evil completely loyal to their dark master?"
Aragorn: "Not at all, orcs are just like us, they have families, feelings and relationships. I'll promise them that once I am king of Gondor, I'll fund free governmental childcare places, with priority given to orc families with small children, that way they'll be lining up to back stab Sauron!"
Gandalf: "Oh, and there was me thinking we'd need an epic quest undertaken by hobbits full of heroism, friendship and sacrifice!"
Aragorn: "No, just remind everyone to check their elf-privilege and of the importance of social justice and the voices of minorities! Speaking of which, Arwen? You are king now! If anyone wants me I'll be standing in the back looking useless!"
Lmao
This reminds me of the Freedomtoons parody of Rings of Power.
Masterful!!
10/10 😂
Would read again
The show writers really counted on the audience totally forgetting everything that happened in the 1st season so they could get away with total inconsistency. And you know what? They're absolutely right. I remember very little of the last season.
New Line fans don’t care about tonal inconsistency. The showrunners clearly tried to please them.
There is no effort to write a good story
I remember enough to know that every bad thing that os happening is Galadriels fault
Honestly, the idea of Orcs having families and babies seems like something George RR Martin would come up with, considering one of his critiques was that "did Aragon have a policy of slaughter and 'slaughter orc babies."
I guess he is the type who would allow the goblin babise to grown up.
"Maybe some goblin is good!" - Said the men before a stone breaked his skull.
He would’ve at least made more sense of it lol. I don’t mind a new idea being written in but it still has to honor something
I hate youtube. I can't even make a Goblin Slayer reference.
The idea of 'Orc baby wat do?' could be good to explore, but it doesn't work with Tolkien's work.
The Orcs work as corrupted creatures of evil, its a world that is more black and white than our own. The narrative is undermined if you have to stop and think about the thousands of Orc families Legolas ruins when he drops a 100 foot ladder on the crowd of raging Uruks.
@@reactiondavant-garde3391 Don't worry, we all thought about it
Angry show writers: "You hate out show because we made Galadriel strong!"
Me: "No, I hate the show because you made her insanely weak."
True, she’s underpowered and made stupid in the show.
Pretty much every decision she makes is wrong and leads to disaster. She's highly incompetent
I think the problem is that galadriel is not even written as main character material in the lore. She is one of the wisest and powerful but she is more of a background character that especially in the first and second age doesn't really play a big role.
LOL! The rings are actually in the title and they still mostly look like kids lollypop rings from the 90s. What a disgrace.
I was sick on the couch at home when the first series came about. And for the first 2 episodes it was not that hard to try and overlook the issues right after Galadriel threw herself from the ship into the water I started laughing out loud and closed that abomination.
lol, I made it all the way until Arondir did that super awkward back-roll while getting beat up by an unarmed giant orc. That was my ‘I’m out moment.’
The show writers learned everything they know about horses from watching Tangled.
the horse is the best character. Im team horse.
I'm convinced they all just went to the wikipedia for ideas & research.
@@travtuck7646 youre giving them too much credit
And that’s a bad thing?
For the amount of money blown off, yes@@pamelalansbury94
I had my friend tell me with complete honesty that he preferred the RoP to the movies.
I had a moment of serious consideration of our friendship and his mental health.
Lol, I would be the same
Obviously there are people like your friend that are watching the series.
Now that's true fandom muwahahaha.
But hold on to your friend, in this age they are hard to come by. The Age of Loneliness.
Did you ever stop to think maybe you are tye problem? 😹
You clowns are hating on this mindlessly
The show isn't quite as bad (better than season 1 and HoTD)
Also if you were not kidding about your comment then you definitely are the issue
So? The movies are stupid, loud and obnoxious.
This Rings of Power seems like Melkor's greatest revenge; a complete mockery of the original work.
If I was a member of Tolkien's family, I'd be succinctly radicalized.
Simon Mario Reuel Tolkien..
As of 2022, he is a consultant on the Amazon TV series The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power.
@@sirawittassanapoom9582 money dear boy
They are partly to blame for this shit show by selling the rights
@@sirawittassanapoom9582You mean he’s cashing huge checks
Simon Tolkien bears a huge amount of responsibility for this crap by lending legitimacy to it.
As far as I remember, precisely the fact that the orcs have an unchangeable nature and that their sole purpose is to do war, is a testament of how evil and corrosive is Morgoth/Sauron's power. At this point they can show Shelob being fierce because she's a poor mother from a bad neighborhood trying to feed her offspring
I don’t think Melkor initially even ‘created’ them for war. He bred them as a mockery of the Children of Iluvatar, since he’s unable to create new life himself. Then he decided they were useful for war, but I think this is mostly a byproduct.
Well they showed Shelob as a sexy woman in Shadow of Mordor/Shadow of War, despite it never being mentioned anywhere in the Legendarium(as far as I can recall) that she could shapeshift into a beautiful form.
@@user-bz9of6tn6l Shadow of war is a pretty fun and harmless fan fiction tbh. While it does takes some liberties it still respects the tolkien's world and basically annhilate it's own impact on the lore by the end of it. While ROP doesn't respect tolkiens world at all and try to rewrite as much as possible and changes the lore very heavily.
@@xelinco3005 Okay, fair enough.
Here's something that occurred to me about the allure of the elven rings, as you described it (I haven't watched the show): the ornate, bejeweled rings are supposedly so beautiful that they can't be resisted, and they have a pull similar to the One Ring because of that; but that's so hard to suspend your disbelief about (especially when they're bouncing around like physics objects in a PS2 game, but I digress). Mere beauty doesn't corrode the will like that, especially to lead someone towards wrongdoing. It's far more impressive that the actual One Ring is a simple golden band that exerts the tempting power it does; the shots in Jackson's trilogy where the Ring kinda just stares back at the camera are absolutely magnetic, and even without the sound design, you can tell this ordinary-seeming object is far more than that.
Also, the lights are a little bright in the studio this time, I think
I hate lighting so much lol.
jackson is such a genius of scene framing. he made everything look exactly as it should, from hobbits to the ring.
you're right, in every scene the ring is in, even without sound design, you just feel the weight and presence of the ring. it's perfect. the perfect trilogy.
@@master_samwise So did the showrunners for season 2, judging by how poorly lit the "dark" scenes are. :D
Exactly. Peter Jackson employed fine craftsmen and jewellers to create Galadriel's ring and various sized versions of the one ring. They made these beautifully and the lighting Jackson used further highlighted this and gave them a sense of uniqueness. By contrast in RoP the eleven rings look cheap, akin to toys children get for 50 cents via those lucky dips outside grocery stores.
Thank you for defending Tolkien! ❤
Jackson fans don’t care about Tolkien.
@@reek4062 Cope
The people who worked on the Lord of the Rings movies really wanted to avoid putting their own political ideas into them and really wanted to pay tribute to the late great Professor JRR Tolkien. I haven’t seen the show, but it seems like the guys who are working on Rings of Power want to do the opposite of that, which is a real shame.
it's not even the politics... they just never even read the lord of the rings, much less the rest of Tolkien's works, and it shows. They just went with the "esthetic" of the lotr movies, with no attention paid to the original material that made that esthetic stand out and feel alive. It's just another trashy cash grab, like most remakes.
It is not that "it seems like," they explicitly said they were going to put their own political ideas into the project: "It felt only natural to us that an adaptation of the author's work would reflect what the world actually looks like." But the problem goes beyond that because they haven't even done that right, things happen randomly just to move the plot forward, as Samwise said, there's no theme, nothing to hold the elements together, just random elements put together.
The movies also avoided putting Tolkien’s ideas in the films, or twisted them.
Also, they have Saruman’s Hitler speech.
@@reek4062you keep making shit comments
What politics is that?
Culture war trash is not politics.
I think, the same way a less intelligent person would struggle to write a story with masterminds, people who seldom contemplate, or disregard personal responsibility and morality, can’t write moral characters well.
That helps explain it.
Our values are expressed through our art
Case in point- Leslie Hedlamp
I've said it before and I'll say it again:
Out of every mistake and stupid decisions the writers made, turning Sauron into a sympathetic villain was far and away the most egregious.
Sympathetic yes. But damn how I wanted a charming and charismatic Annatar. Someone like Lee pace could have pulled it off. Someone entirely selfish and corrupted but outwardly attractive and knowledgeable just like real life villains who turn people to their own ends
@@Binkbinkson A _good_ writer might actually pull both - Sauron perhaps trying at first, more or less honestly, to indeed atone, as he had claimed to Ëonwë, but the lure of charming people to do as he wanted and falling back to his old ways while actually corrupting himself even more and more might have been a real treat to watch.
Well, after Morgoth was defeated Sauron went to Eonwe and asked for forgiveness: he may truly have felt regret. But when Eonwe said he needed to go to Aman for judgment, Sauron fled east out of pride.
And Sauron likely didn’t see himself as evil. The Valar were poor stewards and had effectively abandoned Middle-Earth to its fate, so he probably wanted to ‘bring order’ (under his rule).
Of course I don’t expect movie fans to have actually read the books.
If those ppl made a movie about the Soviet Union under Stalin, they'd try to make him a sympathetic ruler and a loving father and family man. Why should this surprise you?
Every villain in Tolkien's legendarium is pitiable in some way. If you had ever paused to read his books, you would realize that.
I agree with this.
The themes are so muddled that I wasnt sure what they were trying to get me to think. Only that good and evil are seemingly subjective, but then immediately the writers contradict themselves. They're not nuanced discussions, theyre confused signals.
It's insignificant noise.
Yep, that would be because they're not trying to get you to think anything beyond "ooh, that looks nice". This is a product. It's just content. Nothing more.
@@master_samwise It felt just like a Marvel movie: no conviction & all spectacle. Dead in the heart.
And that's just it. Tolkien's work is personal, alive and spiritual. Amazon, a corporation, CAN'T understand those things. It's not alive. Neither is it a passion project to the people under it.
That's what makes the Jackson adaptation different, why it felt alive, because the people who made it had heart & conviction.
Probably the best example of The Dunning Kruger Effect I’ve seen in years?
@@master_samwise imagine being so wrong. Maybe have a look at Rings & Realms, might make you look at it differently.
@@Niekvw If you want to suggest someone consider an alternative perspective, don't lead with an insult.
Sauron comes out of ground and meets a man in 2 minutes and then he is the one person to just start monologuing about “goodness”
And he also happens to carry the "king of the southlands" mcguffin
PLOTPLOTPLOTPLOTPLOT.
@@master_samwise makes sense if you dont think about it
to be fair it shows Sauron's manipulations. This was his forte. It's one of the few things I found the show got right
@@scroseFE except theyve proven that its almost all dumb luck and not actual manipulation.
26:34 Nooo!! That was someones baby orc!! He had a family who loved him!! 😭
Gil-Galad is better in the brief second he appeared in Fellowship of the Ring than he is in Rings of Power.
Why doesn’t Gil-Galad wear a helmet in the films?
Why isn’t he shown to burn in Sauron’s hand?
@@reek4062 My point is that Amazon did him bad,
Yep, he was a total boss in the prologue, not even close to this portrayal.
@@luralord9202 I agree.
Also the opening scene of S2E1 absolutely retcons and contradicts the beginning of season 1. Supposedly Sauron in his cool armor form dominated the orcs and waged a huge war where Finrod died and triggered Galadriel’s John wick arc. But now we know that Sauron was killed (his bodily form) by the orc mutiny and Adar and spent, potentially, centuries in goo form? Which one is it? When did Sauron wage war? In both scenarios they start by saying this is just after Morgoth’s downfall at the dawn of the second age so wtf bro
Edit: spelling mistakes
Oh my gosh I forgot about that part. LMAO
Great point! Not only has this show nothing to do with what JRRT actually wrote, even if you pretend it’s a new fantasy show in a new universe it’s totally internally inconsistent. Crap pacing, crap dialogue, crap world building, crap characters, crap, crap, crap and more crap!!
@@master_samwise they really are unaware even of what THEY wrote lol
You are so right! I had also forgotten about it, but I can tell you that even though I liked the "idea" of showing a flashback about the time Adar "killed" Sauron (this was mentioned in season 1, so I was curious), there was something that felt odd (not only the contradiction you just called out) but everything felt too quick and too much "in your face": Sauron speaking to the orcs, one orc going rogue, and then Sauron stabbing the orc like 30 times in front of all the others, what was genuinely going to happen? the orcs stabbing him like 100 times... it was too obvious, though the idea was promising, on paper.
Absolutely true. Another thing I am confused about is they are now calling the silly Mordor map symbol, the mark of Adar. I thought it was made by Sauron as a "back up plan" or whatever. Sauron even puts the mark on Finrods body (for absolutely no reason). Unless I missed something. Same as Adar being defeated and all orcs killed in the southlands in s1 but now claiming that he was victorious and somehow has a full orc army again. Could claim he is lying to cover a defeat here but certainly didn't come across that way.
0:26 We don't wanna go to war today, but the lord of the land says nay nay nay! We're gonna march all day all day all day! Where there's a whip there's a way!
Not watching ROP was definetly the right choice
You basically said everything I wanted to say. But the one smaller thing that continues to annoy me almost as much as the lore butchery is the way all the characters pronounce names. Why does *everyone* roll their freaking Rs? That is rhetorical, of course. I know they made the actors do it because they think it makes them sound more posh but it just comes off sounding pretentious.
This review helped to crystallize a thought for me:
Rings of Power is a self-insert fantasy depiction of women who think things like ...
"I can fix him!"
"I'm strong enough to deal with his mistreatment and bad behavior!"
and/or
"I had no idea he was evil, despite all of his obvious red flags! There was no possible way I could have known! (Also I will definitely forgive him in an instant if only he shows me a kernel of attention.)"
Not all women are like that! But some of them are, and I can clearly picture them choosing this version of Galadriel as their poster girl and onscreen "representation."
To be fair to RoP I don’t think Galadriel has any intention to try to fix Sauron. I think she is pretty against him now that she knows who he is
@@Eilonwy95 I hope you're right! I just don't trust the writers to *not* depict her forgiving him, thinking (as the type of woman I'm talking about is wont to do), "sure, he is the Dark Lord who slaughtered many innocents including at least one person I loved ... but when I knew him as Halbrand, I thought he was really nice, *and* he's so very cute! I should remember the good times we had and give him another chance!!"
(To anyone reading this who might find themselves in a similar situation: please value yourself and do not give that person another chance.)
@@joywagner979 I could be wrong, but I think that is very unlikely. I think she was only slightly interested when she didn’t know he was Sauron. I haven’t seen anything to suggest she is at all the forgiving type.
Thats one of the worst reviews I have ever seen tbh. Not one second did a thought like that cross my mind. Its weird to instantly attack the Show because hmm women
Hey Master! Love your stuff!
You asked what the theme of the show is, and I think I have an answer: pride and good intentions are no substitute for virtuous deeds. Galadriel is arrogant and selfishly motivated by revenge, and plays right into Sauron’s hands. Cirdan is so confident in his own wisdom that he does exactly what Gandalf warned about, taking the ring out of a “desire to do good”. Celebrimbor expressed a vain desire to craft something to rival the silmarils in S1, and that vanity makes him incredibly gullible to a being that tells him everything he wants to hear (lifted straight out of the Screwtape Letters). Meanwhile Elendil’s made-up daughter pulls a quintessential zoomer move and rebells against her father’s tradition and plays a key role in starting Númenor’s downfall. Even the seriously weird orc thing fits this theme, as the orc idea of “freedom” is about conquering and enslaving humans.
I’m definitely not saying this show is a secret masterpiece, but as I’ve started to notice this trend I’m starting to give it a little more of the benefit of the doubt.
It annoys me so much when people say “It’s just a TV show.” It isn’t - the Lord of the Rings is a piece of cultural heritage that influenced and inspired millions of people and still does to this day. Culture MATTERS. Break down a society’s culture, break down that society. That’s why people get furious at this.
And also....TV shows can be intelligent, thought provoking, witty....bad writing is just bad writing.
All of the homages given to Peter Jacksons work would of worked if it complimented good writing, story telling, and world building , but instead it looks like someones fan fiction. Compare the "best scenes of the show" to a simple scene in GOT season 1, with Ned Stark asking questions in the blacksmith shop, and you are more invested in the blacksmith shop scene compared to any scene in ROP.
"the subtlety of a dwarf perceived by elves"
Be proud of that one. Well written 👏👏👏
The problem is they're writing the characters as if they are humans, but most of the characters in the show AREN'T HUMANS, and while they might have similarities, they don't think like humans do. They didn't have to strictly follow lore to make the elves interesting. They just had to use their imaginations along the lines of the lore.
Honestly, many of them don't even feel especially human.
I have been waiting for this video! As a lover of Tolkien’s work, I am so excited to watch!
By the way, could you consider looking into character vices/virtues in the Hunger Games series? Curious as to your thoughts when characters who live in such an oppressive society that can still show virtues even in such grave circumstances.
The truly sad thing about this show is that it will be the introduction to Tolkien’s world for many people, and they will form a mental image of what he wrote based on it. Such that even if they eventually read the books their impressions will forever be tarnished by this fetid turd.
Just as it happened with the Star Wars sequels, I see some little girls dressed up as Rey and I can't help to get a bittersweet feeling. What can we do? If you have children, introduce them to the right entries of stories or movies, I already watched the original Star Wars movie (1977) with my child, a simple act in the hope she can grow up recognizing good stories from bad ones.
@@luisrods The Anakin character and actor was hated by Many on his introduction. Look at him now...
Also yes I agree Rey might not be as great of a character but she earned her way up just like the other Jedi
She was also trained by the best, Luke Skywalker
This is one of the main reasons I hate the Peter Jackson films.
The people making ROP hate Tolkien. They think the books are racist, sexist, and antiquated. They are remaking it to fit a modern ideology. None of this is accidental, bad writing, or misunderstanding.
The thing is there IS racism and sexism in LOTR. Elrond was a racist jerk. Eowyn is constantly being told to stay put and look after the weak like a good lady. It's throughout the story and founded on solid points (Elrond looks down on Men because he literally saw a Man choose power over freeing the people of Middle-Earth), but the whole point of LOTR is that everyone is forced to rise above those traditions and prejudices in order to save the world. They prove themselves wrong, change their minds, and everyone grows for the better.
RoP is offended that those flaws would even exist in the first place and over-corrects to the point that the message is lost, and the story suffers.
the racial representation is just ridiculous... as an asian homosexual, I don't feel represented in RoP... all I get is constant cringe watching asian elves and hobbits...it's like watching a chinese man wearing poncho and sombrero holding burrito while curling his mustache singing Despacito with his guitarron🤦♀️🤦♀️
@@LaffeeTaffeeGGElrond is anything but a racist in the books but even if he was, he still tolerated dwarven presence in Rivendell, as Durin III had in the Appendices had attacked Sauron’s army from behind.
As for Eowyn, so what? What was so wrong what was told to her? Is looking after the weak less of a noble thing than warfare?
Edited: She was not put down in the books, she was willing to take her people to Dunharrow. It wasn’t forced on her, in fact, the Rohirrim put their trust only in the House of Eorl but Theoden couldn’t spare Eomer to lead the people away to Dunharrow.
@LaffeeTaffeeGG Reminds me of how modern storytellers don't want Sokka from Avatar:The Last Airbender to be sexist. Even though he overcomes it as part of A CHARACTER ARC.
@@dhayabris3163same! Im a gay Southeast asian and I dont need to be represented in an LOTR lore.
Guyladriel would easily fall for Sauron's mind games again. Guyladriel is a moron. In contrast, Galadriel would see right through him. Guyladriel is not and never will be Galadriel.
You should close your computer/smartphone, leave mommies basement, and meet real women.
"Guyladriel"? What the fuck are you on about dude? No one cares about your mommy issues.
Something that made me cringe was the stranger saying to nori, [it’s not odd for a harfoot to miss home]
This is clearly an attempt to mirror the hobbits missing the shire, but
A) the stranger just got there, it doesn’t seem like anyone knows about harfoots, but he, who just rode in on a meteor, acts like it’s common knowledge
And B) harfoots don’t have a f*%ing home
Hollow attempt at recognition
Only halway through your video but you've mentioned something that's really resonated with me. The show's inability to clearly define the difference between Good and Evil. The reason they need peace-loving orc families and unwise elves. These people spent $1B for the bragging rights of saying "We're making Tolkien better."; "Our CGI is the most cutting edge." It's Amazon! Can a bunch of rapacious materialists produce anything that suggests Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely? Are venal producers even capable of seeing subtlety and nuance?
The depiction of Cirdan and especially Celebrimbor truly devastates the heart of even the most stoic Tolkien fans… 😞
I haven’t seen season 2 yet, so I don’t know about Cirdan. But Celebrimbor was butchered in season 1.
When I saw this pop up in my recommended I thought it was more rage-bait.
Then I saw what channel uploaded it and I went "ooooh"
That bad huh : /
I was hopeful for a redemption arc
Such an odd route for a lotr based show to go. Where are the grand themes of good vs evil? The inspirational characters? RoP is just a bunch of nothing.
In the books there is a lot more grey than you might think.
@@reek4062
Interesting. Can you give some examples? I know the good guys struggle to do what is right at times, but the villains are pretty straight up evil.
@Eilonwy95
The Valar have good intentions, but are poor guardians and clearly showed their preferences . They invited the Elves to Aman, both to protect them and for their own pleasure, but by doing this they left Middle-Earth and Men on their own, to be corrupted by Melkor.
After Morgoth was defeated (for the second time), the Valar gave the Edain extended lifespans, great powers and even their own island relatively close to Aman. But by doing this they both disenfranchised the other Men of Middle-Earth, leaving them to be dominated by Sauron, and planted the seeds for the Darkening of Numenor.
After Miriel died, Finwe remarried (which Elves normally did not do) and had children with his new wife: there was a lot of friction between Feanor and his half-brothers.
Thorin (and many Dwarves) were greedy.
Sam bullied Sméagol, possibly stopping his relapse on the Stairs of Cirith Ungol.
And I must mention Helm Hammerhand. In the book he punched Freca, killing him. But Freca had been summoned at Edoras for a council and had not physically attacked him, though he behaved arrogant and made verbal threats. So the following war with Wulf is grey. (Of course Philippa Boyens screws this up.)
@@reek4062 Wasn't Helm Hammerhand also said to eat men during the long siege of the Hornburg? Tolkien was certainly not simplistic, the show just does its own complexity poorly.
@@AthEE_One The Dunlendings said that,.
I find it hilarious that in the show Celebrimbor just knows to make two masculine rings and one dainty feminine one that just happens to choose Galadriel. The design choice would make so much more sense if the bearers of the rings were known before the rings were crafted for them
Spot On! The 3 Elven rings WERE NOT touched by Sauron’s evil. That’s precisely why after he lost the 1 ring at the end of the 2nd age that Gandalf, Galadriel and Elrond could use them to preserve and protect Lothlorien, and Rivendell, And Gandalf could use his ring to inspire others. Amazon has gone from ignoring the lore to outright subverting it. F these guys!
Finally, a completely valid criticism.
Thank you for addressing the Círdan part! When he said Manwë instead of Ulmo i was like wait.... and then the part where the 3 overcome him...But but but they're not corrupted....so what....why...why this whole part when everyone knows already...the one hasnt even been made yet....
Ok so yes amazon did this wrong, but the letters of tolkien do include an idea that there are parts of their culture that may be good or ordinary. There would be orc babies. I know we see uruk-hai born from the earth but tolkien would not right that. He in fact made it a point not to right that for the dwarves. We can assume that orcs bread much like men or Amy other of the races of middle earth. Only it's probably closer to what is seen in a show like goblin slayer than the living family we get here.
Tolkien fought in one of the worst wars in history a war where there was little justification for its start and decided that objective good and objective evil were real and that good and love is worth fighting for. These “writers” got insulted on Reddit once and decided that morals are non existent and evil isn’t objective. Who thought this was a good idea
They took all the critiques and bad stuff from the first season and doubled on it all over.
Just returned to playing Shadow of War, like yeah it's terrible fanfiction but at least creators were never so smug with it and never said it was "Far better than anything Tolkien ever wrote"
And I feel like with that, it kinda did the same thing the movies did. It changed things from Tolkien, but did it in a way that somewhat still respeced Tolkien's lore. I mean the main things that they changed were Elves staying spirits, which kinda works since you have the Nazgul; the years of everything, which in the end doesn't change a ton; and the Shelob thing, which at least makes some sense with her being descended from Ungoliant.
Sure it's still fanfiction, but it doesn't do it in a way that just disrespects all of Tolkien's works and I always felt it kept some themes, especially of sacrifice
Shadow of Mordor/War are pretty far from "terrible fanfiction". They manage to keep to the core themes of his work while retaining a cast of interesting and developing characters. Are they as good as Tolkien's work? Definitely not, but they are incredible stories in their own right.
@@ebonslayer3321 I love them, but they definitely change a lot of things and make some weird choices, so I get where the OP is coming from with "terrible fanfiction". And by that I'm guessing he means how it almost doesn't try hard to follow the lore sometimes
@@ebonslayer3321 You took me wrong here, I love the story and the theme but I know it would make Tolkie roll in his grave same as Rings of Power
@@Keram-io8hv Using someone else's words to add onto it, Shadow of Mordor/War would make Tolkien roll in his grave.
ROP would make him spin like a top, lol
I think Rings of Power can be summed up by this line from Shakespeare's Macbeth: 'Tis a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
Thank you for making this, these people don't get it. Those of us that have put our time in (Tolkien freak since 1991) don't appreciate the egregious mis-handling of something so wonderful, so flawless. I used to daydream about a movie being made someday, who would be in it & how they would adapt it.
When I went to f'ing prison in '99 thru '01 , the first thing I did when I finally got to my camp, was hit the library looking for Tolkien & they had the WHOLE trilogy. They even had some Dragonlance too. Needless to say I checked them out & read them over and over, nobody else wanted them-half of them were illiterate😅😅
Amazon’s biggest sin was their dishonest marketing. This was never going to be an adaptation of Tolkien’s work. It’s a reimagining, an Amazon-original story based very loosely off Tolkien’s writing concerning the Second Age, and is focused solely on telling the kind of “inclusive” story Amazon’s executives want to tell. They don’t have the rights to the actual detailed info on the Second Age, so they had to make up 90-95% of what’s on screen. Had Amazon admitted this up front, instead of gaslighting everyone, maybe there would’ve been less backlash.
The backlash is *mainly* coming from fans of the Peter Jackson films and culture war vultures. Admittedly, many Tolkien fans *rightfully* hate the show, but they form a small minority of the backlash.
LotR contains a fair amount of information about the Second Age, but the showrunners decided that the brand name was enough and discarded it.
@@reek4062does it matter? even a layman can tell you this tv show is an abomination. knowing the lore is pretty far down the list, when one just wants to be entertained.
All adaptations reimagine.
@@crazyralph6386 Yes, it does actually matter quite a bit that a sizeable portion of the outrage comes from the exact corrupting force (culture war grifters big and small simply _are_ an appendage of it) Tolkien hated enough to make it the big bad of an entire mythology.
New subscriber here! Great video! I found you by watching RoP reviews because I was so disappointed with their depiction of Galadriel and how there's no semblance of herself from the books. They made the elves naive! Smh... 🤦♀️ You made me see even more silly bits that don't make sense! Lol
There were ao many parts I looked past, butttt when they MADE THE RINGS IN THE WRONG ORDER AND THEN MADE EVERYTHING ELSE GO AROUND THAT, giant issue, I wanted to throw myself off Mt. Doom!! 😂😂😂😂
The only way this show can find any redemption is if it ends with Sauron being the one telling the story.
A bit of info on the orcs :
According to the late book "Morgoth's Ring" (1993 I believe, so published by Tolkien's son) and The Silmarillion, Orcs can breed, have feelings and can live without a master. They also understand concept of right/wrong, good and evil, camaradery and a have some sens of humour. They're evil, but in one of his essay the professor tried to go into the grey area, like nothing is really bad (evil) in the beginning, even Sauron (Mairon) wasn't. Only Melkor could have been ?
Though clumsy, the amazon series (as an adaptation of his work) is technically lore accurate on this, because the canon is too complex to just be LOTR. Tolkien made too much add-ons with the essays, new stories or even letters.
Portraying an orc as a caring father isn't lore accurate. Not at all. Nor is showing them wanting to live in peace. Refusing to go to a war in which they'll have to fight hard against dangerous foes? Yes, I would have no issue with that. But that would only be because they would prefer to oppress, pillage and kill easy preys.
I don't think the problem of showing an orc family (with crying baby and all) is the actual problem, for each thing they have made right to the complex canon of the Tolkien universe, they have made multiple others quite wrong. The real problem is that this element (and others, like characters recalling Beleriand) appear in a vacuum, inside an already misguided story. What is the role the orcs are going to play ultimately in the end? In the story, they are not tragic figures like Gollum was; they will be only the obstacle, the enemy, and the threat in the great journeys of all the main characters of Tolkien's work. That Adar shows love for the orcs, does not mean they have to show them as a human refugee family, they could have shown them breeding from the ground and still would make sense that Adar felt love for them, the writers show them like they did mostly because they couldn't think of any other way to convey empathy. In the end, it's merely bad writing.
The mindless haters online want something to cry about
You are hurting them with facts
The show isn't lore accurate on this matter. The orcs aren't in a grey area between good and evil. And even if nothing was evil at their beginning, the orcs are evil in the Second Age. Would you argue that Morgoth is in the grey area during the First Age? I don't think so.
Also even if Tolkien had his own doubts about the orcs as a purely evil and irredeemable race, that is still how they are portrayed in the lore, especially in the published texts, which the show is supposedly adapting. Tolkien couldn't change that without having to rewrite pretty much all of it.
@@Parzival-2049 Yeah sure buddy.
It's just occurred to me that Guy Gavriel Kay is still alive. In fact he's not yet 70, and he helped compile the Silmarillion, and he's an established fantasy author with a great track record. Amazon could have paid him $10M to write this and it would have made only the smallest dent in the budget. Imagine what we could have had. (That's assuming he didn't just say "I'm not touching that".)
So cathartic to hear you point out all this! The only logical conclusion is that in the end, after Sauron has crafted the one ring and the Elves learn of the depth of his deception, they do discard the three original, corrupted rings and have Celebrimbor create three new ones in secret without Sauron's knowledge. Which is an absolutely harebrained way to tell the story, but the only one that makes sense of the way the rings are presented here.
I mean technically when Meklor looses the second time... Sauron does turn good (Everything turned from Meklors path)... And Tolkien intentionally left it vague when he became evil again only making it definitive after the One Ring is forged. Possibly meaning the other rings he made with Celebrimbor weren't intended originally to be ultimately controlled by him.
Thank you. "The Lord of the Rings is special. It matters." Yes, it matters.
W title
Peter Jackson's adaptation was always a "Terminator 3" to the original. I just fail to accept so many fans consider it the 'classical adaptation'. RoP was the first film to at least try and capture the deeper layer of Tolkien's works. And they at least wrote something new instead of just following the book and throwing important stuff away like Peter Jackson did. They tried into aesthetics, they tried into psychology, they tried into re-inventing the world and characters.
Orcs were never mindless evil drones... they are violent and aggressive by nature and design, but we see them running from fights all the time, plus they "multiply after the manner of the other children of Illuvitar", so yeah, orc-babies, as weird as it sounds
Oh yeah, orc-babies exist. But the loving nuclear family unit shown in RoP seems completely contradictory to, you know, orc nature. They are inherently violent; that's just how they were made.
@@master_samwise Someone still has to care for the young I'd reckon, but in the end who's to say what we saw is a nuclear family like the ones we imagine ? Maybe they don't have specific parental attachment and let some orcs care for all the littles ones or something.
And even if it was, what is so wrong it ? What I liked about the scene was that they still snarl and growl aggressively at each other in place of having real affection, imo it's like they do have the feeling deep in them from their elf side, but the corruption is so strong that they can't understand or express it without resulting to violence.
I think it's fitting !
@@master_samwise sadly, there's plenty of violent nuclear families in the real world, if they do have couples like humans and elves they still probably beat the life out of each other constantly because that's just their nature
@@master_samwise Maybe they reproduce asexually which would mean they practically clone themselves. Tolkien wouldn't have written it that way, but he wasn't quite specific on it.
@@whitegoose2017 nah they def' be clapping cheeks
The writers don't understand themes, characters, or narrative. And they certainly don't understand morality let alone have a philosophy to work from.
I'm worried about what a story set in the east, but it would be a tragedy of epic proportions if done right.
Rings of Power is the worst case of 'and then' story telling I have seen in recent years.
I actually like this show sincerely, despite straying from the supposed faithful 1-dimensional depiction of good vs evil. For the record, I have read LOTR & enjoyed all the Peter Jackson films.
"The Dwarves are for the dwarves" - The Last Battle
Quality reference
This show only makes me love lotr trilogy even more , my comfort movies are and always be there for me ❤
As soon as they chose moral relativism, this show was doomed to failure. Sauron should not be depicted as a Middle-earth version of Walter White just because a descendant of JRRT thought it might be cool - allegedly. Sauron is the equivalent of a fallen angel and is beyond redemption. He should not be depicted as someone which whom one is expected to empathise. The incredibly bad writing is just the icing on the cake.
I think you're all being very unreasonable. High District Manager Gil'Gadaddy did an amazing job and Guyladriel is one of the best representations of this character from this beloved series I have ever seen.
Ma boi Círdan, what have they done with him ?! :-(
Anyway, thank you for this review. A proper, reasoned and reasonable review, rather than just a volley of insults, like most YTers opt for.
This is one of, if not THE best video on rings of power I've seen
Orcs were evil beings, they weren’t misunderstood family men who struggled to leave their families behind!! Tolkien went into great detail explaining all his characters and never once wrote that Orcs had family units. Evil existed in Tolkiens world, just as it exists in ours today!
We need to talk about the horse on fire (S1:E7).
Anyway, de-villainizing the evil is an utter disgrace. Sauron is a demi-god, Lord of Darkness. He needs to be awesome, scary, insidious, and menacing, not a floopy black spaghetti monster or a dumb human. This turns him into an MCU shaper-shifter. Not cool.
They didn’t have the rights to adapt the story Tolkien wrote so they made most of it up. And because of that, they shouldn’t have fucking made it in the first place! 🤬
If someone told me to write a story set in this time and I was allowed to use the Numenorians, the fall of Numenor, the forging of the rings and so on.. There are loads of places you could go with those allowances. I can just have Numenorians colonize/settle Middle Earth. The entire series could just be about that. Numenorians having to deal with the lesser Men, the rowing bands of Orcs left behind by Morgoth and so on. Present as little as possible about the Forging of the Rings to the viewer and the Elves in general, because they are best left as a mystery that slowly unveils itself as the story unfolds. In season 2 the fall of Eregion happens, but again its not the main point of that season. It's just a side dish. You get to the half-way point in like season 3-4 where the Fall of Numenor occurs and you're left with Elendil, Isildur and Anarion trying to figure out what to do now that the fatherland is gone. Then it's season 5 that it all culminates into events that will lead up to the where the Lord of the Rings begin, e.g. the Last Alliance.
Should of just made their OWN show.
Sauron, one of the most powerful maiar to ever walk middle earth, Morgoth's chief lieutenant, reputed to be one of the most cunning being of middle earth, who required the last alliance of men and elves to finally get defeated by a lucky strike to his only weak point thrown by Isildur as a last resort, get fooled by an orc and turn to goo after getting hit by a crown... That's blasphemy.
What's amazing is that we already have a model for a *great* Celebrimbor. The Shadow of Mordor games portray his hubris and tragedy in such vivid detail.
The grandma of a man playing him does the character no justice.
Celebrimbor assisting in refining the One Ring and secretly giving it a will of its own? How embarrassing.
very good , critical video full of detailed and reasoned logic
Never seen one of your videos, but your title is EXACTLY right… bring this one home…
Well done sir. Subbed.
its a shame seeing such a amazing IP put to such waste
It's not just that this show has no themes, it's that the themes it does have are as antithetical as it is possible to be to the universal themes of honor, love, loyalty, and self-sacrifice found throughout Tolkien's Middle-earth writings. The Three Rings being objects of such desire and having such dominating power over the hearts and wills of other beings is, as you said, EXACTLY THE ONE SPECIFIC PURPOSE FOR WHICH THE GOD OF EVIL FORGED THE ONE RING, THE GREATEST AND MOST EVIL WEAPON OF WORLD DESTRUCTION THAT MIDDLE-EARTH HAD EVER SEEN. For the showrunners to make this change, they would have to 1) fully understand the original theme and purpose of the characterization of the Three, and 2) be fully willing to flip that entire storytelling construct on its head and try to push the exact opposite ideas as the truth. This change wasn't made out of petty garden-variety ignorance - you can't be this specific and thorough about reversing an existing idea into its exact mirror inversion unless you grasp the actual nature of its original form in the first place. To me, that's not incompetence on the writers' part, that's outright malevolence seasoned with hearty helpings of arrogance and bitterness.
There totally were orc women, and orc babies. Orcs were true, living things, and they reproduced in the same manner as all other thinking races. And there were plenty of orcs who weren't keen on the idea of going to war even during the War of the Ring, when Sauron's hold on their wills was so strong that his destruction sent many of them completely insane.
_However,_ I highly doubt that orc family dynamics were particularly pleasant (I personally suspect that the mightiest orcs probably kept the... "use" of the orc women for themselves, and that those women were _not_ treated very decently at all). And orcs didn't want to go to war because war required discipline and working together with lots of other people they didn't like to achieve a common goal, and was just a lot harder and more dangerous than simple brigandage.
Seeing Jeff Bezos bash his own garbage show says something......
Not to mention Sauron escaped using spiritual form not a Goo in the book ( see explanation below pls )
WHAT?
@@master_samwise Didn't you know Sauron was actually the Alien from horror movie The Thing? He just assimilates people and their biomass.
@@master_samwise The comment was a bit confuse and it’s been a while since i finished the Silmarillion but if i record correct Sauron was first defeated when he took the werewolf form and he is defeated by Huan once that happens he takes a form of vampire. After Morgoth is defeated Sauron apparently “repents “ and he is not taken by Eönwë to valinor for judgment i don’t remember exactly if he was not willing to go or either forced whatever. so after about a 1000 years he comes back regaining power in Mordor Sauron then takes the appearance of the lord of Gifts Annatar since he wanted to control the elves.. after that he goes to war since he was able to use the rings but he is defeated once and returns to mordor Sauron once again disguise as a fair form to corrupt the númenórean leading to their destruction and sauron escapes by spiritual form sorry it my comment was miss leading but that’s what i thought behind it
@@matheusxavier9080 I was joking lol. Making a fake shocked comment about Amazon’s goo-Ron not being accurate to the lore. But I appreciate your in depth response nonetheless!
@@master_samwise oh hahaha i just wanted to make sure 😂😂 loved the channel i subscribe ❤️
Good analysis and so many fun asides in your script.....I laughed out loud many times!
Did the writers forget their own show? Quite simply yes. Or more precisely, it exceeded the token limit on the AI that has been writing it.
If someone was given a billion freakin dollars to make a tv series out of events from the silmarillion and still isnt able to create something worth watching then, well, may god have mercy on their soul.
ROFL that ending
Why is fantasy like Tolkien's Lord of the Rings important anyway? It's not becuase humans need fantasy to make life bearable:
"Humans need fantasy to be human." - Sir Terry Pratchett
Why not make crops in the slopes of the Mountain? Khazad dum is the oldest dwarf mansion, but if a dark claudia show up ever1 starves?
We could have done a much better job
There's not much "plot" either; from what I've been able to glean from episode reviews (because I refuse to watch the actual show), nothing has happened this season, other than Nori being Nori and all the failures you adroitly pointed out.
Cirdan is as laughably written as Elrond and Galadriel. Can't wait to see how Bombadil gets bastardized.
"They write the elves as if they were men." Thank you!! been saying this since season one, the ROP elves are pretty much just men with pointy ears and a philosophy degree. There's nothing convincing about them that tells me they are elves apart from the pointy ears and yet Tolkien made it clear you would never mistake an elf for a human. I watched about half of season 1 and then gave up in disgust, I refuse to acknowledge this show exists as a Tolkien adaption in the same way I refuse to acknowledge season 8 of GOT.
Us: “What inspired you to make a lord of the rings tv series?”
Amazon: “Money!”
I want to address the commentary on the conversation between Cirdan and Elrond. I think that there is more truth to that scene than you believe. Maybe it's just my Catholic upbringing, but, hey, Tolkien was Catholic, so I may have more insight than you. Let's take your average fairy tale. Its beauty often lies in addressing some aspect of our fallen world. There's an evil queen, a murder, or something of abject horror that births the conflict. However, the story is no less beautiful for the evil that, in part, births the story. I think the scene actually gets to one possible interpretation of a line in the Silmarillion from Manwe: "Thus even as Eru spoke to us shall beauty not before conceived be brought into Eä, and evil yet be good to have been." In this, he speaks of the evil of Feanor's Oath and his pride, but acknowledges that great beauty will come out of that evil. The whole conversation between Elrond and Cirdan is wonderfully Tolkien-esque in its examination of whether good can indeed arise from evil.
“You don’t mess with Tolkien’s legendarium” - Jackson and co sure did 🤔 why do they get a pass? It’s more than just flaws and inaccuracies, there are many things in the movies that are unforgivable. Cue the people saying “get out of here ‘purist’” but if Jackson’s films are held up as a standard that’s just purism with different goalposts.
Great points. Also sugar free rings is hilarious 😂😂😂
*TOLKEIN orcs are orcs