@@newsuperbowserworldOnly problem with that is when you forget that you cranked the volume up for something too quiet, so the next thing you listen to is way too loud.
Yours is simply worse. 1. The orchestra hits sound like they've been vocoded to themselves 10 times. 2. The orchestra hits are quiet. 3. The Synths are really low quality. 4. Guitar sounds like it has reverb over it, that's just what I hear though. 5. Mostly everything sounds like it's not in sync, the vocals being the most out of sync. 6. At 2:02 on your remaster the volume on those notes in the "Ah" sound like it's pulsing in and out. Either that or you started sing there because the vocal remover you used didn't work. 7. In your remaster at 3:06 the original remake by Who's Who? it says "Every move shows it (shows it)" While yours says "Every move shows it (shows) Completely skipping the it. Overall your remaster is an 11 pieces of crap out of 10 pieces of crap. Your definition of a remaster on @oldtimesmsm video saying "this isn't a remaster because it adds more elements (or less elements) a remaster is the enhancement of audio blah blah blah" Therefore your remaster isn't a remaster, the quality is worse and your lack of having ears is DEFINITELY a new element. My 7 reasons to your remaster aren't opinions, THEY are facts. That's what your remaster sounds like. There are 2 comment on your remaster stating it's bad, and THEY are the only comments there. There is a reply on @oldtimesmsm that agrees with him. Which is 3 people in total who this your remaster is bad who commented on your remaster. (@poplmao doesn't count here because he is one of the commentors.) All things considered, YOUR "REMASTER" IS TERRIBLE AND SO IS YOUR OPINION!
@@Assaultnah he made another one that i didn't know about making that comment and it's still terrible, it's like someone's playing the song in another room
![Ulterior Motives: Restored? [V2]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/eBPgAsGV9gE/mqdefault.jpg)
![Ulterior Motives: Restored? [V2]](/img/tr.png)
this is actually the best “remaster” of the original version so far. Great work
aged like milk
@@FreakingPerfect 🥸
Fantastic but yearh, boost the volume
You have a couple of volume buttons that can change that.
@@newsuperbowserworldOnly problem with that is when you forget that you cranked the volume up for something too quiet, so the next thing you listen to is way too loud.
Ok this is actually very good
This is actually a good restoration but the volume is too low unfortunately lol
Is because the song come from a p*rn movie
@@techgaming-on4wg true
@@techgaming-on4wgthat doesn’t matter
You have a couple of volume buttons that can change that.
@@techgaming-on4wgamazed at how dumb this reply is
If only we could remove the static, then it'd be almost perfect
i wish my school didnt get rid of my adobe audition license then i'd probably be able to remove it for y'all and master it
audacity can do it too :v
@@mintybudgiewhat happened to it
@@BrandyEvansVIsBackAgain they just got rid of it cause i didnt take photography in grade 11 but i did in grade 10 and they use adobe in school so
very very good, just remove the white noice and increase the volume of the vocals
reading the description is hard
The best remaster!
Increase the volume & reduce the white noise. This is honestly fire. 🔥
could you provide the vocal and guitar tracks
needs a lot more bass
has some stereo panning issues but its good ig
I've made a better remaster on my channel!
I made a remaster I think it's better in my opinion
Yours is simply worse.
1. The orchestra hits sound like they've been vocoded to themselves 10 times.
2. The orchestra hits are quiet.
3. The Synths are really low quality.
4. Guitar sounds like it has reverb over it, that's just what I hear though.
5. Mostly everything sounds like it's not in sync, the vocals being the most out of sync.
6. At 2:02 on your remaster the volume on those notes in the "Ah" sound like it's pulsing in and out. Either that or you started sing there because the vocal remover you used didn't work.
7. In your remaster at 3:06 the original remake by Who's Who? it says "Every move shows it (shows it)" While yours says "Every move shows it (shows) Completely skipping the it.
Overall your remaster is an 11 pieces of crap out of 10 pieces of crap. Your definition of a remaster on @oldtimesmsm video saying "this isn't a remaster because it adds more elements (or less elements) a remaster is the enhancement of audio blah blah blah"
Therefore your remaster isn't a remaster, the quality is worse and your lack of having ears is DEFINITELY a new element. My 7 reasons to your remaster aren't opinions, THEY are facts. That's what your remaster sounds like. There are 2 comment on your remaster stating it's bad, and THEY are the only comments there. There is a reply on @oldtimesmsm that agrees with him. Which is 3 people in total who this your remaster is bad who commented on your remaster. (@poplmao doesn't count here because he is one of the commentors.) All things considered, YOUR "REMASTER" IS TERRIBLE AND SO IS YOUR OPINION!
@@Sparjetcooked his ahh
@@Assaultnah he made another one that i didn't know about making that comment and it's still terrible, it's like someone's playing the song in another room