Court Security Idiots try to stop us filming, Sherlock Jones Appearance NOT RESTRICTED
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ต.ค. 2024
- Meadowhall Original Video:
• Mass Audit at Meadowha...
Sherlock Jones was up Infront of a judge at Sheffield Magistrates Court charged with a public order offence. Whilst been at the court we had some confrontations with Security who just said some ridiculous things.
Please Subscribe to the Following :
effing chunky monkey:
/ @effingchunkymonky.3154
Sherlock Jones:
/ @sherlockjones603
Society X:
/ @societyxuk
Live Free:
/ livefreeleeds
www.PayPal.me/M...
mblagborough@gmail.com
Merch: shimmeroo.com/...
www.fanbies.co...
When you said the simple word 'no' to his jumped up sense of authority. Priceless.
Great vid Marti, loved to see you stand up to the Court Minions. "We shall NOT be moved"!
Respect to you all Martin for all of you to be along side Sherlock on his court hearing , hope all goes well for Sherlock ..
Congratulations Sherlock. 👍🏻 Good To See you Back.
Filming inside is prohibited as they do not want you to see how fcking corrupt they are.
This is how many dictatorships form, when human beings and members of the public don't assert their legal rights, even people who have researched the Legislation like Marti, will still bow down to social pressure by men in uniforms like these guys. It is little concessions like this that can form peoples rights being eroded over time. We have had dictatorships in Europe in recent history and even today, like in the 80s like General Salazar in Portugal, and we even have tyrants like Vladimir Putin right now, people should never bow down to men in uniform if they believe they are acting lawfully. Good on Marti Blagborough for asserting his rights in a public place.
It's court property, so who pays for the courts???
WE DO, so it's not private property.
we have somes security Clowns here
Court sausages-best line ever 🤣😂
I've giving no directions - its OK we have google maps. Very good.
Best of luck with the trial.
You can never be certain in Magistrates court.
The threat of touching is common assault
There are no signs to ascertain that this is inside the court, the guy is making it up as he goes along, to assert his dominance, as Live Free points out to him. This reminds me of Animal Farm by George Orwell, where 2+2=5, or in this case ''Filming outside the court is the equivalent of filming inside the court, even though they are outside the court''.
As a guard from a Court they are drastically confusing two different things these guards you're welcome to film outside a court all day and night hell if it was at my court I'd come out to have my picture took with Marti keep up the good work videos entertaining as always
@UCwd8pSqb7Y1j0AOaOaKThaA as guard at a court the law is inside the court so soon as you enter the building you can't film and it is a criminal offence but outside the court building no offence is being commited, the guards are getting confused as court guards powers of removal etc etc extend outside of the court building covering all of courts property, car park etc but filming is only illegal inside the actual court building
King Marti on security throne 🤣🤣
Pretty sure the courts act 2003 says nothing about "filming" in court.
It only mentions photography, portraits, or sketches.
*Doesn't say anything about video or audio recordings.*
Criminal Justice Act 1925 ...i believe.
Excuse me 'Stop talking bollocks' 😂😂😂
A friend of mine has been stopped 9 times in the last 2 months I've told him to record every time they stop him. I've also told him not to consent to stop and search
The last time he was sitting in his car eating lunch when I came up to his window and started harassing him I've told him also it's getting yourself a good lawyer and video every single interaction. I think it's taking the piss
That's totally unexpected. .. the bridge thing lol
Bollocks NOT a swear word 1977 never mind the Bollocks album by the sex pistols went to high court and sex pistols win
This is better than any television series watching you and live free. Big respect marti
Go on Marti boy love your hard work keep going we love the videos 👍😎
Marti doesn’t know the meaning of ‘work’ he’s a total dosser. I’d be ashamed of him if I were his kids
The forgien ones are allways mostly aggressive lol and we'll done marti
Invaders* I think you mean! Also love Honda!
@@oliverattwell8013 cheers
Make sure they learn the hard way an have them reported for their actions an threatening behaviour
Good for you standing up for rights in this video
He wakes up during the night saying “this is court property “
OMG second court guy was speechless that you didn't follow his orders. He's used to the public doing what ever he says and was gobsmacked you didn't do as you were told like naughty little children 🤣🤣
Love your channel pal …keep them coming…
If you're correct about being able to film outside there (or wherever else you are), what's the need for the insults? You're only making yourselves look bad. Educate yourself on what laws enable you to be there so when they tell you to move, you can inform them of your rights to be there. They can't argue with facts.
It really is difficult to understand how anyone with authority could possibly employ so called ‘security ‘ men as stupid and ignorant as those shown in this (and many other) videos.
Interesting that going mob handed, with lots of cameras causes them lots of problems.
Another great Video Marti
I thought public photography was allowed inside the Courts building in the Public section.
Not in side a court room.
That is actually my belief also.
@@MartiBlagborough I've just found out about the Criminal Justice Act 1925 and it seems clear from that, that photograpy/recording is not allowed in anywhere in the court or court property.
It also says in the court precinct (exactly how far that extends, who knows?)
I think it something you should look into because that law gives quite a bit of power/danger to a potential "tyrant".
Great vid mate cheers 👍keep it goin we're wit u man
Dont wear the masks dont conform to this crap
I cannot believe you just did that Well yes I can
Seems to me that YT don't want us to see what really goes on!!
I was fortunate enough to watch the original upload - no issues.
However, it has happened to me in the past so I know its true.
Big Respect for standing against the Tyrants. Peace 👊👍
Pound shop braun strowman that goon with the big beard 😂
Egg head was facing other way no sia badge..
The coffin dodger absolutely speechless when you said NO ?
ZZ Top hit hard times
Good video upload marti great when there's a few of you all together and big up live free
Great work Marti
Well i think it's nice that the courts pull pensioners straight out of retirement homes and give them one last crack at whip. :)
Your having too much fun . Keep going
Your not I am,your not,I am lol
Legend has it, there has been sightings in the past of a tall black dog that runs at people and snarls at you and vanishes before your eyes round that area near the yellow storage place and the court.
Fukin ell Bernie Ecclestone has gone down in the world, since leaving F1. 😉🤣
I've seen T V cameras standing outside court , you can't choose who you want to discriminate against .that's out of order 😮
The security guard with the white hair removed me from the court 2 months ago.
Big up
yay I often dont like your videos but I will be back on the 14th LOL
Well done and good luck to Sherlock in July
I love these guys what they do lol he he ha ha
Wow. Live free. We are in the pursuit of truth. You are in the pursuit of dominance and hierarchy. This is poetry. Perfect.
It remains illegal to take photographs, film or make recordings in court or any part of the court building.
Is there a link to the original video
Yes it's in description
@@MartiBlagborough sorry I didn’t look
PS off his head
Who is off there head?
@@MartiBlagborough Them security guards
What does he mean "this is our property". How can he be so ignorant.
Age restriction shouldn't really affect your viewers surely? Unless you have a bunch of kids watching you... 🤔
Same as me they can hit you infolict pain but they cannot brake us
What a fekkin concrete jungle, horrible architecture.
5:26 boris johnson enters
well bone
Heh Heh 🤣 just seen effin Chunky Munky. Reminds me of the old ad Weebles wobble but they don't fall down. He will remember that cause he looks like a lad who was born in the 60s. When the police would say hello to you in this manner. Allo allo allo.
How did you manage to mix up the 2 different Courts . Ooops 😮., it's a good job the magistrates court is only a short walk away, from the crown court .😮
I see the rell one Good job by the way
What the moons not made of cheese 🧀
Egg heads badge
Have u been putting oil on the redickeless beard lol 😂
5:19 tough boys
I've gone over the video a number of times and there is one important piece of evidence regarding being in a public place. On the door to the right of the entrance there is a £75 penalty notice. My stop frame is not good enough for any further definition of the sign, however, this notice clearly creates a public area and so any member of the public has the right to enjoy that public area for the purpose of accessing, reading, and acknowledging the content of the notice. You were most assuredly were in a publicly accessable area. Those officials in embroidered stuffed shirts were completely incorrect in their assumption of control of the area. You had every right to be there!
I'm sure you will be going back!!!!!!!
That's a valid point
@@stevetrueffo3907 Well, the majority of the 1925 act was repealed and the section you refer to was against "photography" which threw up a problem as video hadn't been invented and this created a grey area. In September 2011 Lord Chancellor Kenneth Clarke announced the Government's intention to partially repeal the section covering courts commenting on the need for more transparency.
The wording you refer to is as follows -
"of any person, being a judge of the court or a juror or a witness in or a party to any proceedings before the court, whether civil or criminal;"
So you see, you have always been able to photograph any body or any thing else in the building or it's precinct.
There is no mention of other such photography being prohibited, except for commercial purposes and we then get into another area altogether.
@@grouchomarx5649 Well, you are right, the 1925 Act is mostly repealed. However, Section 41 (concerning photography,) isn't repealed.
You say "you have always been able to photograph anybody or anything in the building or precinct". Yes, that's true except for "Judge of the Court, or a Juror or a witness in or A PARTY TO ANY PROCEDURES BEFORE THE COURT".
I think it's highly likely that a majority of people entering the courthouse or waiting around in public areas would fit the above category.
In practical terms you would probably, technically, albeit unknowingly, break this law within minutes of entering and videoing your surroundings.
If a security type thinks you've captured an image of, say, a court officer and calls the police you can get arrested.
I think the charge could even be contempt of court. As I say, if it was the bbc, security wouldn't give two hoots, but auditors aren't likely to get MSM privilege. That's why auditors need to be aware of this vulnerability/loophole.
Re: the grey area of photographs v video's I'm fairly sure I've seen cases where the defense was "I wasn't taking photographs I was videoing" and the outcome was videos are just a (fast) series of photographs. I can't for the life of me remember where I read/saw that info. (I'm going to have a little delve into finding out later)
@@stevetrueffo3907 It's certainly easy to see why this is still a grey area.
In all reality they're is no such thing as a "photograph" anymore. Any "recording" process is a capture of data and stored in one's and zeroes, interpolated and reengineered by software algorithms and then stored on digital media.
If a photograph still exists, it is the end result of reverse engineering of the data and a final print out, however there is very little hard copy produced these days.
I'm sure it's why the gray area has shifted over time and probably what has brought about rethinks of what constitutes legal data capture activity.
My take is that if you are standing in a publicly accessible area then whatever data can be perceived by the eye, can be recorded for future analysis by whatever means you have available.
But that's only my take!
Brilliant wen you and live free come together respect 🤜👊🤜🤛
gateway signage marti, ive got out of so many parking tickets highlighting the lack of it. Same situation for pvt property GERFUT
You've gone from been a good auditor fighting for justice against corruption to just been rude to anyone who challenges you
You are a 🔔end
Nice one boys
🎥📽📹🚔🚓📷📸🏴👀
Ha ha lol he he ha ha
Turn the camera off 🤣🤣🤣
Access to Magistrate and crown court is in law unless special hearing
lol
Tune 👍
Marti don't you need a sia badge to work on courts
Courts are for contractors of contracts
When did outside become inside
He just threatened you
Me and you are summons To appear In November
Me you and Sherlock on 25th yher mate.
Good keep it up
You and the rest better return to that shopping centre!!! & Where's Arthur?
So funny lads
14th July Inipendence day.... in France
At 5:27 Boris walks in!
Good luck Sherlock.
Marti good thing for cleaning screens and lens is micro fibre cloths
Check out Criminal justice act 1925 section 41, be careful.
Wheres egg heads badge he hasn't got one
Chav’s with cameras
You should have more subs than you have keep it up .
Great video. But you can exactly flim inside the public area . You just film inside the court rooms.so if you wanted to you can walk straight into the public areas inside the courts
i know this has got nothing to do with this video, but has anyone heard from Dan PAP
Not for a considerable amount of time
Does not know the differences between the inside and out an thinks the moon is made of cheese ?
He definitely didn't do the hokey cokey as a kid😂👍
Where's the pinned comment raaaahhhh