Huge Russian Military Factory BURNS, Poland DEMANDS Nukes | Breaking News With The Enforcer
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 มิ.ย. 2024
- Go to ground.news/enforcer to stay fully informed. Subscribe through my link for 40% off unlimited access this month.
NATO has made a statement today that Nuclear weapons may be stationed in Poland very soon in response to the Russian militarization of Kaliningrad, and also the movement of nuclear weapons into Belarus. Denmark announced it will give all of it's F-16's to Ukraine giving them 45 F-16s in the future total from NATO. A Russian Uranium mine has flooded in Russia, leading the surrounding waterways to be contaminated with radiation. A key electromechanical plant burned down in Voronezh today once again making Russia's war that much more difficult.
Make sure to support us on Patreon so we can keep covering news like this!
/ the_enforcer
Join The Enforcer's Twitter:
/ itstheenforcer
Support The War Effort:
u24.gov.ua/
Go to ground.news/enforcer to stay fully informed. Subscribe through my link for 40% off unlimited access this month.
lol, could you have done that Ground News promo more wooden?
Grats on the sponsor, lads!
Gottah pay for that schooling hehe
👍 Will give them a go as I to switched off all TV, print and radio news in February 2022, as I could not believe we were back in the 1930s again 🤦 Will investigate this recommendation 👍
Ground news is great....been a subscriber for a few months now
No, Russia is not trying to conquer Europe. You don't deserve to plug Ground news, you guys suck! Russia has enough territory as it is to manage. This was never what this war was about. NATO was encroaching on Russia's doorstep. Stop pushing known western propaganda.
russians had nukes in Poland while they occupied Poland from 1945 till 1991. The Polish general public didn’t know about this until few years after russians left the country
And, the US had nukes in Turkey back then too.
I thought it tasted dry!
@@kathrinekerns8398 stop drinking vodka please
The USA did have missiles in Turkey but I believe they were withdrawn as part of the resolution of the Cuban missile crisis in the 1960s.
Hopefully the Ruskies don't put nukes back in Poland☢️☠️
Its Russia, they don't care about the environment at all! Its worse than we can imagine.
True
It is probably already polluted. You would be horrified if you did a quick Google search.
Kyshtym left the chat.
Uranium ore isn't *that* bad. Most will stay in the mine due to its density, some fine particles will make it to the surface but they will hardly be an increase to the natural radiation, especially in an area where it is in the sediment anyway and should already be found in the soil at an above-average rate. I think I vaguely recall a gold prospector finding Uranium ore pebbles at a river.
LOL. tell that to the american liberals and their electric cars, solar panels and their green agenda. They are the ones who are actually don't care about the environment.
Thank you Denmark.
Tell Russia they're not nukes, they're Little Green Men.
No, you blew the joke.. the correct punchline was ".. they're just Little Green Bombs."
lol
They're only Special Operation Tools... Not weapons 😉
We don't have nukes. Just sex bombs.
XD
Tell Russia it is only careless smokers lol.
POLAND CANT DO IT....BUT ITS OK FOR RUSSIA TO SEND THEM TO BALARUS....HOW IS Poland escalating?
It’s an incredibly massive responsibility to undertake once in never out as they say a part of me is in agreement with Poland but would be amazed if that were to actually happen in the near future 🇺🇦🇬🇧✌️
@@Nick-pq4ri
The NATO members that host Nuclear weapons don’t have control over them (with exception of the Netherlands that only wanted to host US nuclear weapons with total control over the weapons).
Escalating = Interfering with future Russian plans.
@@Moraprecisionreloader Yes it does. You have the advantage of time to detonation. It's a huge advantage.
@@Moraprecisionreloader You're right! But not for that reason. You're right because Russian nukes are mostly old soviet stock that probably have not been maintained since the USSR collapsed in 1992.
To be fair, russian started this with moving nuclear weapons to belarus. Why was that necessary? Why should belarus host nuclear weapons?
For the same reason the whole of Europe hosts weapons for the US and NATO? It really is a simple answer to a simple question, that a simple mind cannot seem to grasp.
They put them in Belarus so they can threaten the west
For the same reason they were placed in Turkey for the past 50 years and to this day are denied to exist.
For the reason that a certain three letter agency overthrew a fair and square elected proRussian government in this country back in 2013, put in puppets, and attempted to join the EU/NATO before rightful vengeance was exacted.
The same reason why you and the people on this channel can not understand that democracy is an infantile joke. It only gives citizens the right to agree to those that are prepared to do the v word.
People dont want democracy or any positive outcome for that matter. People want to be cottled and for tyrants to enforce their OPINIONS. The world has always been this way and probably always will.
The pen might be mightier than the sword, but the sword burns the book.
Blame me. Blame yourself. Blame humanity.
They gonna say nah we just left it there and do nothing with it no need to worry about xD
I think it's to put Nato countries on high alert so they feel they need their equipment themselves and will send less to Ukraine.
Norway, the netherlands and Denmark will donate over 70 F-16s in total.
I understand why Poland wants this protection. Why not? It is the russians who started moving nuculear weapons.
This is starting to turn into a "Cold War's Worst Hits" playlist when it comes to Russian actions. At every turn they repeat the same old mistakes, only now their country can't handle the stress of those mistakes.
Neither could the USSR. They militarized themselves senselessly to the point of bankruptcy and eventually collapsed.
@@hoodoo2001 They also had a socialist economy, which debilitated their economy and eventually caused it to collapse. And Putin is making the same mistake, undoing all the reforms and making the Russian economy socialist once again.
@@hoodoo2001 USSR could work with it massive size but it elite keep pocket&spend like no tomorrow there bankrupt xD
How exactly were they supposed to adopt the western military doctrine in the counteroffensive when they didn't have the air cover, the artillery, the mine clearing equipment that the western military doctrine would dictate??
They weren't.
Western military doctrine called for the Uks to mass thousands of troops in fields and wait for Russian bombs. That's how they started.
I just consider if Russia had just respected the borders of its neighbours, it would still have been the largest land mass in the world with plenty of natural resources and could have provided all their people with a good standard of living.
If Ukraine had had nuclear weapons, Russia would just have had to get along with its neighbour. If Russia had not invaded Ukraine, Finland and Sweden would have been happy continuing as neutral, and Poland would not have felt the need to ask for nuclear weapons to be stationed on Polish soil.
What a chain of events Putin has created.
When railcars and trucks of new weapons comes rolling in, I think we're going to see a lot of action. The Ukrainian's are pissed at Russias behavior lately.
Those resources aren't being produced fast enough
Actually for quite a while.
Yeah. Not happening. Russia is surging their military. We forget that Russia is still the largest military in Eurasia, and 60 billion is still only 5% of our annual military budget. It sounds like a big number, but considering the task, it's still very little.
That 60 billion will buy time, but I don't think it can do much more than that.
Denmark's defense ministry recently said that the country was selling 24 used F-16 fighter jets to Argentina, as the Nordic country upgrades its air force.Denmark is in the process of upgrading its fleet to the more modern F-35, and has around forty F-16s, of which around 30 are in operation, according to Danish media.The country has also committed to supplying an unspecified number of aircraft of this type to Ukraine, and has begun training Ukrainian pilots. Still very good for Ukraine.
There are 1,004 surplus F-16's waiting to go somewhere.
yes, the american military complex apreciates denmark's stupidity.
Argentina's new, idiot President intends to take back the Falklands, hence the new purchase.
@@tedmossbut those are mainly in USA and the US do not want ukraine to have them in quantity. Denmark was ordered to sell to argentine instead of donating to Ukraine.
Guarantee if Ukraine invented a drone with a button that says "Do Not Touch" and drive it to a enemy trench they would press the button.
Native uranium ore is relatively low radiation. The ore needs to be refined to be useful.
The problems will come when the Russians pump out the mine and release all that water into the local environment.
It takes three tons of uranium to extract one gram of radium.
@@kens32052 Why do you want Radium?
@@tedmossBecause it tastes good 😉
There are places in Eastern Siberia that used prisoners to mine ore and they only lasted 2 to 3 weeks. A Russian Fisheries Biologist hiked to the top of the Mt. they were mining under and lost his hair, permanently.
News about the f16s is big
As a Canadian I'm embarrassed that my country isn't following Poland's lead.
@@daveriddlelin9327so, you think that Russia would commit suicide, which it would by using nukes. Committing suicide would more than likely be the end of life on earth as we know it. The Russians view the world very differently, but they don't view their own extinction as desirable. Unless your an expert on Russia, your claim that "Russia will use nukes" is proof of your ignorance and irrational fear.
@@daveriddlelin9327 Escalation started by Russia, everything NATO does is a reaction to Russia's aggression. If they want NATO to chill out they should go home and keep their hands to themselves
@jamesbruce8749 You can debate geopolitics after the nuclear apocalypse lol
@@daveriddlelin9327I detect Russian talking points comrade. Go hide under the rock.
@@daveriddlelin9327 russia has had nukes near NATO borders since the 90's, and lately moved more nukes to other NATO borders. It's a scare tactic and it's foolish to do exactly what russia wants us to do which is to act out of being scared... A bully won't stop if he gets his way. And the treaty you speak of that NATO allegedly broke is non existent, so find a better excuse to appease to the dictator...
In regard to the dam failure it occurred to me that mud is thicker than water.... but not by much. 😂
If it is just a mine, Uranium is an alpha emitter, which even the skin can block. You want to avoid it inside your body, but even then, the heavy metal poisoning is probably more of a concern. Uranium is also extremely dense so it is unlikely to float up out of the mine.
Exactly. Plus, the amount of fissile uranium in the mine is only 1% of the uranium present in the ore. Most ore bodies contain less than 1% uranium oxide in some form, so out of a metric tonne of ore, you would be lucky to get 100g of fissile uranium. Not a lot.
Slava Ukraine and LSA!
Way to go Denmark!
❤
Denmark 🇩🇰 ❤Ukraine 🇺🇦 freedom and democracy
Thx for the daily news and congrats for finally having a supporter (at least for the short news). Guys,keep up the good work ...and ... LSA,LSA,LSA!!!
...and Slava Ukraine and the Leaf Spring Army will never die!!!
Thank you. Watching from Alaska.
Moscow sounds like Berlin did in '39
Not just F16s but they could also get 24 Mirage 2000s if they wanted. A fleet of F16s, Mirages and Gripens would be very formidable in due time.
Ukraine TURNED down F18's from the Australia .. So not much chance of them going for Mirage 2000's
@@kittyhawk9707 From what I understand, the Hornets were very near their end of life while the Mirages still have lots of time left and are basically turn key. Upgrading the F18s would be another large cost and take years to complete.
@@kittyhawk9707 The Aussies didn't want to go over and do the maintenance.
@@myplane150 An F-18 does not need to be upgraded to beat anything the Russians have.
Problem is they would have had to start training on Mirages almost 2 years ago to be ready to deploy them this year. And the maintenance crews would also need training.
We have two forests in Germany where you can pick ore that contains Uranium from the ground, no digging needed. Though concentration is so low, it’s commercially unviable and no risk to health. I’d expect the same in this case. Plus, even if it were broken off, Uranium is dense and doesn’t float far.
Dam if I get ground news I don't need you lol
It makes sense to have nuclear in Poland..
On the uranium mine, the radiation levels will be very low and will do very little to change the levels or cause problems. Keep in mind that it's uranium ore, not processed or refined.
Uranium ore is very unpredictable, some of the time it’s barely radioactive and some of the time it’s highly radioactive.
There will be very little if any impact of radiation from the flooding of the mine.
You know you made it to the big leagues when Ground news sponsors you. 🥳👍
That is dangerous talk going on out there and needs very careful serious consideration I don’t see it happening no
Ukraine has been very savvy targeting Russian infrastructure and military sites, especially with their limited resources, although with many of the long range drone strikes, the drones themselves were homegrown, being produced in Ukraine. Slava Ukraine!
I don't think the water will even register as radioactive. Uranium isn't high in radioactivity until refinement.
THANK THE ENFORCER TEAM for the first hand updates war videos,,,,
Old Shoe🇺🇸
Why is it an escalation when Russia put Russia in Belasarus ?
This is tit for tat..
I found this Channel in a live stream which topic was about Iran and Isreal, since then, I`ve become a huge fan of this channel. Keep up the good work! =D
thanks for your work!
Thank you for the video!
Appreciate these updates/news very much.
Thanks, Enforcer and the team.
Great update as usual
Thanks
I don't think the uranium mine will be an issue on the grand scale. It's unrefined and naturally occurring, just as it has for millions of years. If it was a waste dump on the other hand, then the entire region would be totally screwed.
I don't believe anything significant. Minute leeching into standing water.
The old tailings from production will now be washed over the country side and down river. Heavy metals exposure is not good.
@@kennethprocak5176 That's not exactly a unique issue for this mine though as such can happen in nearly any place for a variety of reasons. I was talking about the radioactive aspect of the uranium specifically. In the long run, I expect the Fukushima incident to have been far worse than a flooded abandoned mine.
Did we learn nothing from the Cuban missile crisis?
Don't worry so much about the 'radioactive contaminants'. You said it's from a uranium mine, so (assuming that nothing additional has been dumped there, and I wouldn't put that past the Russians on past experience) it might just be uranium and that's fairly harmless if diluted. So, it really comes down to whether this area's played host to toxic dumping from facilities dealing with nuclear weapons
It isn't just uranium. I suspect it is likely found with non-radioactive, but still toxic heavy metals. While the mine is flooded, toxic tailings piles with pieces with a lot of surface area are washed downstream. Considering the lack of Russian environmental concern, probably nothing was done to mitigate the problem.
Thank you for the update !
Really like this format. Great update. Slava Ukraini!
Thanks for the update❤
Was not expecting you here today great breaking news always there when lsa needed you
Raw uranium ore is barely radioactive. No significant radiological risk. Other chemicals used in the mining processes could be far more hazardous.
Thanks Andrew.
Denmark have 41 F-16's including the 2 seater variants
Wow, i knew it was coming in the short war summaries, but it was still surprising
Isn't it amazing how they can precisely hit a radio tower but somehow can't avoid housing blocks 🤔
its not true..about the danish f16....its not all..that's going to be send to Ukraine
.some of them have been sold to argentina..last week...
That's Right But They are Supplying A Lot More Than the Initial Number they Said they would.
@@briannagle6328 It seems Norway will be able to send more F16s than they thought too. Most of Norway's operational F16s were sold to Romania back in 2021 and it seemed at fist only 5-10 of the remaining were in fighting condition. Now they are talking about 12 and there are ten more that haven't been evaluated yet so the total number may en up even higher.
I love Ground News!
Thanks for the update Enforcer, another great reporting & true analysis LSA🫡
Does the robot bring the Daleks to mind for anyone?
In Russia : People smoke always in the wrong place
The Enforcer : "But Nevertheless" 😅
What about the We will Never have Ads thing.
On streams has been said many times. He's brought up the possibility of certain advertisers on the videos
So, no ads except when there's ads
@@phillipfixes All I've ever heard is no sponsors, no ads. In fact, they just reiterated it in the episode before last.
On the streams. Same reason they don't talk about patreon on the streams. If you didn't know this was coming, you haven't been paying attention
Thanks for the update!!
What ever happened to Israel and Iran did they just stop or is nobody allowed to cover it anymore
Thank you for your informed content
It was stated as a factory that produces military equipment!
I mean didn't Belarus jut get themfro potin and rocket technology to north Korea.
Lol, I thought that land drone had blunderbusses at first.
There are already seven known countries in Europe that hosts US nuclear weapons, Poland just isn't one of them.....yet
But there’s just one (the Netherlands) that has total control over the US nuclear weapons.
@@MightyRude but that is by agreement. You don't want nukes? don't have them. If you want 100% control of the nukes you have in your country? demand it. The other countries don't want to maintain them or be responsible for anything that "may" go wrong. So they don't have total control...that's how the game is played.
@@bluflaam777
Germany and Turkey tried but the US said no.
I guess it’s because of the importance of the Netherlands as the portal to Europe.
LOL RUSSIA LOL, from Canada, Québec
Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawieck had declared Poland’s interest in hosting nuclear weapons under NATO’s nuclear-sharing policy back in late June 2023, citing the reported deployment of Russian nuclear weapons to its Kaliningrad region and to Belarus.
Guess they're for real for real...
It needs to happen faster than the Russian government
Russia should fear poland more than any other country. The US is more powerful but poland wants to get at Russias neck bad! 😂❤
I tried so hard to contain my laughing
When you look back at history Poland and Ukraine have had brutal relations with Russia
@@tesha199Like when the House voted for the $61B? 🤣😆😂
@@terraflow__bryanburdo4547 yeah, I laughed then as well... laughed for the fact that Ukrainians believe it would have any serious effect on the outcome
@@tesha199 Drugs are a terrible thing to waste. Clearly your motto.
I swam in a flooded Uranium mine when I was a kid, it's not dangerous at mining purity.
I'd be more concerned about poor nuclear waste disposal practices, that's where real harm can occur.
Thanks, your presentations are very interesting and you have become professional in your skill level. LSA will never die!
As an old cold warrior I find nukes on both sides less concerning than on only one. Especially if that's the other side!
There are an estimated 7,077 tons of uranium in the mine. Not "just some"...
The problem wasn't Ukrainian tactics, the problem was us. We trained them in Western style military doctrine...great. What is the key component of Western military doctrine? Achieving air superiority at a minimum and air dominance ideally. Not only did Ukraine not have air superiority, they didn't have artillery superiority either. We set Ukrainian troops up to fail. I would argue the Ukrainians exhibited excellent doctrine during the counteroffensive. Another thing we are taught in Western militaries is to adapt, improvise and overcome. The Ukrainians did exactly that and, after their Western style attack ended in utter failure, adapted their tactics to at least achieve minimal gains against an extremely well dug in enemy.
Minor if any significant environmental damage, unless the tailings dump is washed away, more likely economic damage.
Enforcer👍
I would say it will settle out as it's molecularly heavy. So in moving water, a skid type mark, in trapped water it will be the deepest layer of sediment
11:10 They built an X-Com SHIV?!
That's a big fire. Wonder what was actually in it.
Fortunatly Uranium ore itself isnt as radiactive as many would think. Heck it might've made the mine safer to be in after they pump out all the water carrying all the toxic dust with it :P
I understand what Bluesky4eve is saying, with reason. However, it's a big however, the problem is Putin puttng nukes into Belarus. Strategically Europe has to "equalise" or up their defence. I'm not for nukes, by a very long longshot. I was born in Budapest in 1955, immigrated to Canada when I was 10. I despised and still do Russia. I agree, nukes are not protection. It's mutual destruction.
Hello Enforcers!
I mean if we trust Turkey to host nukes under NATO, then Poland should get the same respect.
Swedish fighter planes flew sharp missions over Gotland
Swedish fighters flew a sharp mission over Gotland at the weekend. The Swedish Air Force says very little about the incident.
- It was not an offense nor an exercise.
Gotland is Swedish territory, so what! 🇸🇪✌️
Germany: new to being sabotaged? 😅
Russia: Да 😢
The Uranium deposits within the mines aren't likely to do much, that stuff isn't processed and is in its natural form.
having no damn clue on radioactive ores, and dispersal amounts in large bodies of water
i'm gonna guess it'll be described as elevated levels but largely nothing, nothing if you dont drink it, swim etc.
LSA baby 😁...
At least they're lucky it's raw uranium and not weapons grade uranium that's contaminating their water.
12:25 I wonder how many of those fit in the back of a Bradley?
Are they gonna climate tax the Russians after this?.
Unless Poland has full control over the nukes, it hardly makes a difference where they sit given that Russia remains within the striking distance regardless.
That ground drone needs a much bigger wheel base.
Ground news on it thanks Enforcer LSA forever 🙏
Does this mean that Russia is going to be sending actual trained soldiers into Ukraine?
"Uranium fever has got me going down Uranium fever is spreading all around"
30 f-16s is a monster
When you mine materials for use in power reactors or weapons, generally the ore is not a big deal for safety. Uranium is radioactive but slowly radioactive. When you start to modify other elements and isotopes in reactors you get really unstable radioactive elements. So nuclear waste is dangerous, but not mine waste. What is also dangerous is chemical waste instead.