This is the third of a seven part series, so stay tuned for more! If you want to get a head start on learning more about this exciting and urgent topic, check out Bill Gates' new book "How To Avoid A Climate Disaster." In it, Gates sets out a wide-ranging, practical, and accessible plan for how the world can get to zero greenhouse gas emissions in time to avoid a climate catastrophe. Check it out: bit.ly/PlanForZero
@@ecneics7660 Read again. They wrote "zero greenhouse gas *emissions* ", not "zero greenhouse gas" in general (which is A. pretty much impossible and B. not what anybody is arguing for)
@@catfurrpiwpowpiwpaw Considering the extremely short attention span of the current generation, it's probably the best way to teach them ( in short increments).
The soundtrack was indeed an essential tool for the filmmakers to let me know how exactly I should be feeling. I am so happy it was present otherwise I would be so confused about what my emotional response should be to the facts they were presenting. Thank you indeed for removing this overwhelming burden from me the simpleton viewer..
All my chem nerds out there know that for every MOLE of cement produced its one MOLE of carbon dioxide and since the molar mass of calcium oxide is greater than the molar mass of carbon dioxide, its closer to 0.78 tons of CO2 per ton of CaO produced. Nevertheless, this is still a great video! Keep up the good work TED-Ed!
You're right, and if you take the whole process of making cement into account it changes little. Making one mole of Brownmillerite (4CaO·Al2O3·Fe2O3), plus the CO2 produced from heating the kiln and transport it adds up to quite similar amounts per unit of weight. I typed it all out under a different video, I'll try to find it. found it: Calcination of limestone yields 44% CO2 and 56% CaO by weight. If we go to the final mineral, 4CaO·Al2O3·Fe2O3, we get 1 4CaO·Al2O3·Fe2O3 (MW: 485.96) + 4 CO2 (MW: 176,04). Then CO2 is (176,04/(176,04+485,96)=) 26.6% of mass produced. If that CO2 release gets doubled from kiln heating+transport, that's ~42%. From this video btw: th-cam.com/video/UmnFTffYM3w/w-d-xo.html
@@kcravuri It is sloppy, yeah. Basic stochiometry. Perhaps whoever gave the information has ton as a unit of quantity in their language too. Dutch uses "ton" for 100.000 (usually currency), as well as for 1000kg.
@@adiyaroy0 y'know, creativity doesnt have to be only fueled by your head. you can take inspiration from things you see in your home or outside, or use the internet to get started :)) just have fun
@@jeremythomas4744 I learned my art techniques by myself, it was from true nature when I went outside and saw beautiful sunsets blending colors parrallel from each other and the warm feeling from it. Basically what I'm trying to say is that you progress and learn to become an artist
I saw a video on the cement problem recently and I remember how surprised I was to find out that concrete has a big impact on our climate. I think that's a topic a lot of people don't know about. Thank you for educating :)
@@josiahlutchman4913 Obama did not bomb a hospital. I doubt he owns any bombs. The U.S. military did what you say without his approval. They have bombs. The airstrike was requested by Afghan forces who had come under Taliban fire. Obama apologized for the U.S. military's role in the error. The Afghan forces carry more responsibility though.
@@josiahlutchman4913 If you're talking about the Kunduz hospital in Afghanistan, then you're misleading. The U.S. commander in Afghanistan, John F. Campbell, said at the time that the strike was made in the U.S. chain of command, but never elaborated whether or not Obama was directly part of the chain or was aware of it's authorization at the time. You make it sound like he directly ordered an attack on civilians, when in reality Campbell and Afghan forces likely had ordered the attack on the assumption that Taliban forces were nearby. The blame can be more squarely pointed at Afghan commanders and U.S. commanders who weighed the idea that civilian casualties were a necessary sacrifice if it killed Taliban forces.
The video itself without audio makes us understand about the concept 50%, which in turns with audio gives us the complete information Hats off!! To the editing team...
Ahmed Khan, India: a scrap dealer, came up with a method to convert the ever-increasing piles of polythene into Polyblend, a cementing material which can be used to produce higher quality roads.
I used to work for a concrete testing laboratory, and the toughest sample of concrete we ever received was some old Roman concrete. If I recall correctly, the most likely reason was that they built without reinforcement, and anything that wasn't tough as old boots has collapsed in the last couple of millenia, so we've only got the best of the best still standing.
Ted ed, one day, you will be known as an organisation that helped humanity fix the world! Thank you so much for making content like these. I hope that our world follows your advice.😁 Edit: The narrator's voice is so smooth, Jazz started taking notes.😂
Let's check out how the "Ahom"s (a dynasty which lasts over 600 years and now belongs to the north eastern region of India) build their concrete by mixing "Bora" rice (a variant of rice) and fish and some other stuffs and the buildings are still standing over 500 year.
Not only them but you must also know about the Indus Valley Civilization from North West India, because they were the most intelligent civilization in the History of the world I think, they used Interlocking bricks and also knew about most of the things we use today, like Bath Tubs but those days they were huge, and they even had great economy in their civilization and a good knowledge in science as of those days
@@lonestarr1490 all these information and development of their civilizations is written in ancient Inscriptions and Manuscripts, which Indians are really proud of Also, Sanskrit, one of india's Main languages, Is one of the most Oldest Languages in the world, it was even the language of the gods in the Indian Mythology
@Gautam Rajesh They had toilets and even a state of the art plumbing and drainage system (for the time)??? Damn! South Asia really has regressed over the years haven't they, and only now are they beginning to head in the proper direction.
I want to get back my memories of what I am and I want to share the knowledge that I forgot about the metaphysical and answers that hummanity has asked for millennia. Im going to use all the money and brain power that I can get to make that happen
Thank god! This video would help me so much in the future. I am an aquaculture student, and currently working on a coral transplantation project using clay as the substrate, and the reason is portrayed in this video! Usually most people using concrete as the substrate, but using concrete literally means we are supporting their factories on emitting CO2. So I will try to use clay as an alternative. Wish me luck 🤞🏼☺️
The background music just made the experience more fulfilling. It felt like a movie that should just go on...great animations and narration too!!! Kudos to the entire team!! Thanks TED-Ed!!!
Hello! The ton of carbon dioxide we cite includes not just carbon dioxide produced in the chemical reaction, but also carbon dioxide released during heating and other industrial processes involved in the production of cement. Hope this helps!
Im in the construction business and from personal experience I've seen cheaper and cheaper materials being used. This video is very informative but we are building very cheap. The building we work on are mostly office buildings but we do work residential too. These buildings are built to last decades and im talking less than 40 years those buildings will be better off reconstructing than remodeling. We need to build to last, the romans built with some strongass concrete. We need to build to last centuries. Also work on a type of building which can be easily remodeled or parts that can be easily replaced. There is tons of waste of good material too in the way we build.
Hi! The ton of carbon dioxide we cite includes not just carbon dioxide produced in the chemical reaction, but also carbon dioxide released during heating and other industrial processes involved in the production of cement. Hope this helps!
I worked in a cement plant and it’s amazing on just how much greenhouse gasses they emit depending on the cost of oil and gas they witch you coal for whichever is cheaper it’s kinda sad
"genius has been declared by a great authority to be patience; and patience, in this sense, means unflinching, undaunted perseverance. But this view of genius is perhaps deficient; for without the higher powers of the imagination and reason" Charles darwin - 1871
Hi TED-Ed! Great video, I enjoyed it a lot as always., including the message of the video. But there is a mistake at 3:07 where it is said that a ton of CO2 is produced per CaO. Since the molecular weight of CaO is 56 g/mol and the molecular weight of CO2 is 44 g/mol, the ratio would actually be an approximate 786 kg of CO2 per ton of CaO. Maybe the ratio was concluded counting other manufacturing factors, but if it was determined by chemistry alone, then I think it is wrong.
Hey there Ted Ed - you could’ve also added that the fact that trees intake CO2 and give out oxygen is the only major reason why the global warming is increasing at such a slow pace compared to what actually could’ve happened if there were no trees, so this is like also one of the mere reasons to Save tress !!
3:05 uhhh i know this is a simplification but that's just plain wrong. People in the comment are saying they're learning from ted-ed so here's the correction: You can't directly compare the resulting mass from the chemical reaction because the two molecules has different molecular mass. Accounting for that, every ton of cement produces around 0.79 ton of CO2
*Every teacher should show 1 TED-Ed video at the end of their class to the students! They can show the relevant or non-relevant video. Nevertheless it'll be a treat for students and something new exciting to learn.* If you are a teacher please do this. If you are a student please suggest this to your teacher!
Until there are viable altenrative solutions for steel, concrete, chemical, glass, and agricultural industries, net zero will be nearly impossible to achieve. We've done the easy part: energy and transportation. Now, the public eye needs to shift towards focusing on emissions from industry.
And to think most buildings are made of concrete and steel. We must not put the cart before the horse. There is still of lot innovation, science and engineering to be done before we can even think about net zero.
The assertion on insentives in production and manufacturing for carbon capture is absolutly true, this is one of youre greatest videos yet, more comparisons between ancient and modern would be amazing
Ted-ed videos have become, a way of entertainment. The presentation is marvellous; the designers have the ability to present gruesome facts with precise beauty. Bravo
@@billyfox6368 Yes a study published showed during the pandemic the earth heated up because there was less CO2 and other emissions making the sky more clear and more sunlight reaching the earth. Water vapor is the major greenhouse gas not CO2. Climate is much closer tied to solar output. You're welcome.
The title is complete click bait. This is solely climate narrative bs with a very brief history on cement. Nothing to do with the title at all except some vague conjecture. Also it's moronic, they are complaining and demonizing one of the most essential life giving elements on the planet CO2 which is a byproduct of cement production. While ignoring there won't even be much cement production because of the lack of river sand. Which I'm sure TED has covered already. It's completely disingenuous editing and hijacking a whole video doing a bait and switch to push a narrative.
"for every ton of concrete theirs a ton of co2" Umm that's wrong so I'm gonna correct that so its for every mol of CaO made from CaCO3 their a mol of CO2 released. I mean how are you gonna get 2 tons from 1 ton of CaCO3, bro this is supposed to inform the public so how about a little error checking next time. Other than that good job.
"I mean how are you gonna get 2 tons from 1 ton of CaCO3" - They didn't say that, they said for every ton of CaO you'll get a ton of CO2. You're right about the incorrect unit though, they should've used a mole as opposed to a mass unit. But then you'd have to explain the concept of the mole to a bunch of people who have little/no chemistry knowledge. Given the molecular weights are pretty similar (44 & 56 for CO2 & CaO respectively). It's still a pretty hefty amount of CO2 produced, around 0.8 tons of CO2 per ton of CaO if my math is right, so the point still stands IMO. Though maybe they should've just went with a statement like that instead of focussing on the equal amount (in molecules) of CaO & CO2 being produced..
@@valorificmirage I think they were trying to get across that you get equal amounts (in quantity, not mass) of CaO & CO2. Due to their molecular weights being a bit different, you'll get different masses of CaO & CO2 out.
@Kishblock pro I mean the hubristic, anti-scientific, illogical "belief" that man has the ability to maintain a stable climate. We are feathers in a hurricane, who think we are masters of the Universe.
Bit of an error with the weight of CaO and CO2 as MW of CaO is 55 g/mol and MW of CO2 is 44 g/mol. When you make one tonne of CaO, you release slightly less CO2, about 0.8 tonne, from CaCO2 decomposition alone.
I don't see what the big uproar about going vegan is about. changing to renewable energy production is a more effective and more damaging thing to leave unchanged
This is the third of a seven part series, so stay tuned for more! If you want to get a head start on learning more about this exciting and urgent topic, check out Bill Gates' new book "How To Avoid A Climate Disaster." In it, Gates sets out a wide-ranging, practical, and accessible plan for how the world can get to zero greenhouse gas emissions in time to avoid a climate catastrophe. Check it out: bit.ly/PlanForZero
Hi ted ed
Feels like your superstition vedio
Your a bit late
How is the energy Ted Ed
@@ecneics7660 Read again. They wrote "zero greenhouse gas *emissions* ", not "zero greenhouse gas" in general (which is A. pretty much impossible and B. not what anybody is arguing for)
Thank you. animators, voice actors, everyone in the team. We see you, we love you.
omg
@@KODO123PRODUCTIONS ?
Yhrl
@@KODO123PRODUCTIONS lol?
Getting those cheap points
Ted ed was my online class before online classes EXISTED
Hear, hear
You mean "were mainstream"
Mine too
ExisTED
And it still works better
TED-Ed, showing terrible realities with beautiful animations
Kurzgesagt has also done some videos on these with amazing animations too! Both Ted-Ed and Kurzgesagt are my go-to
Hmmm
@@lixxie144 yea i love kurzegesagt!
@LaviniaVeiled That we can use to fix the world.
Hello?
Them Romans sure knew what they were doing.
too bad they could't keep their society from falling.
@@Gadget-Walkmen
All great empires crumble from within.
@@Gadget-Walkmen “Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men and weak men create hard times.”
Great with roads, but screw living in that society.
Not always, lead poisonings was a major issue.
TED Ed: The only class where I don't feel bored
It will be showed in schools in future
Too bad they only make short videos
This comment is going to be famous
@@catfurrpiwpowpiwpaw Considering the extremely short attention span of the current generation, it's probably the best way to teach them ( in short increments).
@@adilbek.ermekov my teacher used one of his videos
Got this as an ad. Finally, ads tailored to what I’m actually going to enjoy.
Random someone : "Why do we breathe?"
Me : "To live. Such a boring question"
TedEd : "Why do we breathe?"
The same Me : "Hmm sounds interesting"
th-cam.com/video/L1ccoAxq854/w-d-xo.html
Why is it always like this SAME here tooo😭😂😂😭
@@Brightifyisthebest why
@@Brightifyisthebest why put the advertisement du lusche self promoting
@@Brightifyisthebest thanks for wasting 10 seconds of my day
The soundtrack is really something, it really helped get the point across.
Interesting, tbh it was annoying for me. Different strokes for different folk.
I kinda wish it was louder.
The soundtrack was indeed an essential tool for the filmmakers to let me know how exactly I should be feeling. I am so happy it was present otherwise I would be so confused about what my emotional response should be to the facts they were presenting. Thank you indeed for removing this overwhelming burden from me the simpleton viewer..
th-cam.com/video/L1ccoAxq854/w-d-xo.html
Kinda sounds like Cities: Skylines music
All my chem nerds out there know that for every MOLE of cement produced its one MOLE of carbon dioxide and since the molar mass of calcium oxide is greater than the molar mass of carbon dioxide, its closer to 0.78 tons of CO2 per ton of CaO produced. Nevertheless, this is still a great video! Keep up the good work TED-Ed!
You're right, and if you take the whole process of making cement into account it changes little. Making one mole of Brownmillerite (4CaO·Al2O3·Fe2O3), plus the CO2 produced from heating the kiln and transport it adds up to quite similar amounts per unit of weight. I typed it all out under a different video, I'll try to find it.
found it: Calcination of limestone yields 44% CO2 and 56% CaO by weight. If we go to the final mineral, 4CaO·Al2O3·Fe2O3, we get 1 4CaO·Al2O3·Fe2O3 (MW: 485.96) + 4 CO2 (MW: 176,04). Then CO2 is (176,04/(176,04+485,96)=) 26.6% of mass produced. If that CO2 release gets doubled from kiln heating+transport, that's ~42%.
From this video btw: th-cam.com/video/UmnFTffYM3w/w-d-xo.html
As soon as they made this mistake: I scrolled down into the comments to see if there is a comment like this, nice.^^
@@Tinky1rs still that bit in the video is misleading and many may try to apply it in a different situation and fail the test😂
@@kcravuri It is sloppy, yeah. Basic stochiometry.
Perhaps whoever gave the information has ton as a unit of quantity in their language too. Dutch uses "ton" for 100.000 (usually currency), as well as for 1000kg.
Agreed!!! I was weirded out when I heard it because the masses of CaO and CO2 are not equal!!!
"Imagination is more important than knowledge"
Me an artist: Goddammit I KNEW IT
Lmao ikr I guess smart but my creativity is 💩 I feel like a failure
@@adiyaroy0 y'know, creativity doesnt have to be only fueled by your head. you can take inspiration from things you see in your home or outside, or use the internet to get started :)) just have fun
Ermm u need to know art tecniques to draw well, just like music (im a musician)
So sad most artist lacks imagination this days. If only there were a way to go back in time and delete Deviantart and Tumblr.
@@jeremythomas4744 I learned my art techniques by myself, it was from true nature when I went outside and saw beautiful sunsets blending colors parrallel from each other and the warm feeling from it.
Basically what I'm trying to say is that you progress and learn to become an artist
Imagination is more important than knowledge
- no education system in the world
both imagination and knowledge are important
Can’t teach imagination dingus
True
Imagination is useless without knowledge
It's sad
I hope the animator gets paid really well bcoz TED-ED always surprises me with their insane cartooning and animations
Simp for likes...
I really like this channel, no useless long-winded intros, no prolonged speculation at the end, just the good stuff.
Unlike certain channels
Keep the propaganda short and simple for your simple brain,
Ted Ed is teaching us how to be more imaginative, while also providing knowledge. Giving us a better time than school.
So true and deeeep
I guess this is what happens when there is an actual incentive to produce quality educational content
😢😢😢😢 I don’t like homework. I am a moron 😢
I saw a video on the cement problem recently and I remember how surprised I was to find out that concrete has a big impact on our climate. I think that's a topic a lot of people don't know about. Thank you for educating :)
If people actually did what Ted-Ed said the world would be carbon negative.
And we'd not have any infrastructure, so most of us would be dead.
@@SioxerNikita meh didn't saw the video
@@SioxerNikita you’re that one guy who doesn’t watch the video for more than 1 minute so you can post a hate comment
Were it so easy...
SioxerNikita we'd prolly die from the cold as well
It’s a good day when Ted Ed posts
Well for me it's good night lmao
The material that could change the world :-
Thumbnail - Roman concrete
Reality - Human imagination
th-cam.com/video/L1ccoAxq854/w-d-xo.html
Imagination isn't a material
@@Brightifyisthebest dude stop
"We are the first generation to face climate change and we can also be the last generation to face it" .
If we can beat the greed out of the human race LOL ain't going to happen
that second statement could mean we may either fix it so no one has to or there will be no one left to fix it.
Why do people quote a man that bombed a hospital? It's frustrating to see people look up to these types of people
@@josiahlutchman4913 Obama did not bomb a hospital. I doubt he owns any bombs. The U.S. military did what you say without his approval. They have bombs. The airstrike was requested by Afghan forces who had come under Taliban fire. Obama apologized for the U.S. military's role in the error. The Afghan forces carry more responsibility though.
@@josiahlutchman4913 If you're talking about the Kunduz hospital in Afghanistan, then you're misleading. The U.S. commander in Afghanistan, John F. Campbell, said at the time that the strike was made in the U.S. chain of command, but never elaborated whether or not Obama was directly part of the chain or was aware of it's authorization at the time. You make it sound like he directly ordered an attack on civilians, when in reality Campbell and Afghan forces likely had ordered the attack on the assumption that Taliban forces were nearby. The blame can be more squarely pointed at Afghan commanders and U.S. commanders who weighed the idea that civilian casualties were a necessary sacrifice if it killed Taliban forces.
Can we take a moment to appreciate the INSANELY GOOD animation!
The video itself without audio makes us understand about the concept 50%, which in turns with audio gives us the complete information
Hats off!! To the editing team...
Ahmed Khan, India: a scrap dealer, came up with a method to convert the ever-increasing piles of polythene into Polyblend, a cementing material which can be used to produce higher quality roads.
I used to work for a concrete testing laboratory, and the toughest sample of concrete we ever received was some old Roman concrete. If I recall correctly, the most likely reason was that they built without reinforcement, and anything that wasn't tough as old boots has collapsed in the last couple of millenia, so we've only got the best of the best still standing.
The artstyle is good as always, but the music this time...
*Chef's Kiss*
Takes you back...
I just want to praise the background music, impossible to not be amazed by it.
Ted ed, one day, you will be known as an organisation that helped humanity fix the world! Thank you so much for making content like these. I hope that our world follows your advice.😁
Edit: The narrator's voice is so smooth, Jazz started taking notes.😂
Let's check out how the "Ahom"s (a dynasty which lasts over 600 years and now belongs to the north eastern region of India) build their concrete by mixing "Bora" rice (a variant of rice) and fish and some other stuffs and the buildings are still standing over 500 year.
Not only them but you must also know about the Indus Valley Civilization from North West India, because they were the most intelligent civilization in the History of the world I think, they used Interlocking bricks and also knew about most of the things we use today, like Bath Tubs but those days they were huge, and they even had great economy in their civilization and a good knowledge in science as of those days
@Gautam Rajesh What makes you think they didn't follow a religion?
Gautam Rajesh from where did toilet come from and pls don’t say india does not have toilet it has plenty should we export some to us??
@@lonestarr1490 all these information and development of their civilizations is written in ancient Inscriptions and Manuscripts, which Indians are really proud of
Also, Sanskrit, one of india's Main languages, Is one of the most Oldest Languages in the world, it was even the language of the gods in the Indian Mythology
@Gautam Rajesh They had toilets and even a state of the art plumbing and drainage system (for the time)??? Damn! South Asia really has regressed over the years haven't they, and only now are they beginning to head in the proper direction.
*Imagination is more important than knowledge*
Only if my education minister knew that,I would be so glad😿
You wanna become doctor or wanna sleep forever?
@@bait5257 I wanna be a doctor but physics resists me so I wanna sleep forever...
@@naturesgirl6864 Bruh. Which class?
@@bait5257 12
I want to get back my memories of what I am and I want to share the knowledge that I forgot about the metaphysical and answers that hummanity has asked for millennia. Im going to use all the money and brain power that I can get to make that happen
TED-Ed is one of the most important sources to please my curiosity. Thanks, for that.
Thank god! This video would help me so much in the future. I am an aquaculture student, and currently working on a coral transplantation project using clay as the substrate, and the reason is portrayed in this video!
Usually most people using concrete as the substrate, but using concrete literally means we are supporting their factories on emitting CO2.
So I will try to use clay as an alternative. Wish me luck 🤞🏼☺️
I'm teaching a unit on the science of concrete right now and we are also focusing on staying green. Perfect timing!
Before I start watching this, I'm just gonna guess it's vibranium
Close.
Graphine came to my mind
@: B i was thinking mars
God particle and dark matter
Came to my mind
Dunno why 😂
@Harshit Joshi I know . I am sorry
I meant god particle and dark matter.
whoever wrote the music for this video deserves raise! its so good!
The background music just made the experience more fulfilling. It felt like a movie that should just go on...great animations and narration too!!! Kudos to the entire team!! Thanks TED-Ed!!!
"Electricity accounts for 27%"
Me: nervously shuts off my LED light
LED light, with heavy metals in it.
3:09 Shouldn't it be for every mole of cement, there is a mole of CO2? They have different molar masses, no?
Hello! The ton of carbon dioxide we cite includes not just carbon dioxide produced in the chemical reaction, but also carbon dioxide released during heating and other industrial processes involved in the production of cement. Hope this helps!
:0 sorry if I stuttered
Thanks TED-Ed, now I have a concrete understanding on this topic
I learn more from watching Ted-Ed while drinking tea in the morning than I did through my entire last year of science in school.
The presentation ethics/nature of Ted-Ed is unmatched on TH-cam. Just Awesome. Just Awesome!!
I feel like i'm listening to ted ed and the ratatouille soundtrack
Im in the construction business and from personal experience I've seen cheaper and cheaper materials being used. This video is very informative but we are building very cheap. The building we work on are mostly office buildings but we do work residential too. These buildings are built to last decades and im talking less than 40 years those buildings will be better off reconstructing than remodeling. We need to build to last, the romans built with some strongass concrete. We need to build to last centuries. Also work on a type of building which can be easily remodeled or parts that can be easily replaced. There is tons of waste of good material too in the way we build.
Every Ted Ed's video teaches us something
That's the correct way to show something that's bad, giving a headline to solutions so instead of making us afraid we become proactive
I love how there’s like 10 people claiming they’re first
Ikr
First reply
First reply
1rd reply
I saw the video when it came out. I got an add for it 4 months later. I like how y'all tried to put this info out there.
3:10
Thay made an error for every MOLE of CaO we make one MOLE of C02 wich in mass is for every 560 tons of CaO we make 440 tons of CO2
Hi! The ton of carbon dioxide we cite includes not just carbon dioxide produced in the chemical reaction, but also carbon dioxide released during heating and other industrial processes involved in the production of cement. Hope this helps!
I work on the cement industry, and every year we have a target to decreasing clinker factor to reduce CO2
I worked in a cement plant and it’s amazing on just how much greenhouse gasses they emit depending on the cost of oil and gas they witch you coal for whichever is cheaper it’s kinda sad
This video made a lot of sense usually Ted Ed confuse me with difficult explanations and oversimplifications.
“If humans are so smart, why do they continue cooking themselves?"
- coolAlien143do
I didn't understand, please explain
@@prasunbagdi6112 if I tell you then the quote would be useless
@@eurasiaacaci.-110 Helps if you write it in coherent English. "If humans are so smart, why do they continue cooking themselves alive."
@@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep actually no it's sound betters in that like way
Deep meaning quote
a teded upload during classes. nice
"genius has been
declared by a great authority to be patience; and
patience, in this sense, means unflinching, undaunted
perseverance. But this view of genius is perhaps
deficient; for without the higher powers of the imagination and reason"
Charles darwin - 1871
The Animations deserves Award🔥❤️ so easy to understand
TED-ED is my source for entertainemnt nowadays
🙄
Why is that your account name
@@PapaSeed to get subs perhaps (just like me :-!
@@D0or I find it rude
@@PapaSeed me or the other guy?
Hi TED-Ed! Great video, I enjoyed it a lot as always., including the message of the video. But there is a mistake at 3:07 where it is said that a ton of CO2 is produced per CaO. Since the molecular weight of CaO is 56 g/mol and the molecular weight of CO2 is 44 g/mol, the ratio would actually be an approximate 786 kg of CO2 per ton of CaO. Maybe the ratio was concluded counting other manufacturing factors, but if it was determined by chemistry alone, then I think it is wrong.
Love the way the boiling frog keeps recurring in this series. King Kong Frog at 0:48!
Nice spot bro....
Ted Ed is awesome of how they keep everything connected
Hey there Ted Ed - you could’ve also added that the fact that trees intake CO2 and give out oxygen is the only major reason why the global warming is increasing at such a slow pace compared to what actually could’ve happened if there were no trees, so this is like also one of the mere reasons to Save tress !!
I just hope we can all band together to save our Mother Earth before it is too late :-(
Thank you Ted-Ed for this wonderfully animated video! 😊👍🏻
This channel deserves more subscribers
Enjoying learning more about innovative ways to combat climate change with my class. Appreciate these videos!
I’ve already seen this video and I’m subscribed, but seeing an ad for it would make just wanna watch it again because of the amazing quality
Can we talk about the soundtrack for a second? It's amazing
3:05 uhhh i know this is a simplification but that's just plain wrong. People in the comment are saying they're learning from ted-ed so here's the correction: You can't directly compare the resulting mass from the chemical reaction because the two molecules has different molecular mass. Accounting for that, every ton of cement produces around 0.79 ton of CO2
Ok but its a decent approximation, and great for those who don't know much about chemistry.
*Every teacher should show 1 TED-Ed video at the end of their class to the students! They can show the relevant or non-relevant video. Nevertheless it'll be a treat for students and something new exciting to learn.*
If you are a teacher please do this. If you are a student please suggest this to your teacher!
I was waiting for a video from this series 😀
I love this series ❤️
Could you make more videos on such interesting materials?❤️ From India.
Sequesting Carbon is a losing game if we keep releasing it faster than we sequest it.
TED-Ed: This material could change the world.
Me with my one dying brain cell: Vertical half slab?
Putting TED-Ed's editors in cement to make the cement more carbon neutral. That's how we change the world.
The quality of this video is mind-blowing
TED-Ed: The channel that teaches more than online school.
I love these TED:ED. I used them to study and got an A
Until there are viable altenrative solutions for steel, concrete, chemical, glass, and agricultural industries, net zero will be nearly impossible to achieve. We've done the easy part: energy and transportation. Now, the public eye needs to shift towards focusing on emissions from industry.
Net zero will always be impossible
@@josiahlutchman4913 Not exactly impossible, but very hard to achieve.
And to think most buildings are made of concrete and steel. We must not put the cart before the horse. There is still of lot innovation, science and engineering to be done before we can even think about net zero.
As long as there are billions of us, we have a problem.
Gosh, that music makes it so much more intense
"it changed the world"
theres three times now, actually
I thought it would be something to start WW3. It would be the third time
THE ANIMATION
Ted-ed: Is teaching us about climate change
The cat in the washing machine at 1:35: YOU SPIN ME RIGHT ROUND BABY RIGHT ROUND
I just love this channel,from the intro to the content
Can we just talk about how good the animation style looks? ☺️
The assertion on insentives in production and manufacturing for carbon capture is absolutly true, this is one of youre greatest videos yet, more comparisons between ancient and modern would be amazing
Does anyone besides me, want this world to be borderless?
Yayy... THEY SHOWED NUCLEAR in their clean energy graphic! This is so rare, Kudos to TED-Ed.
Last time i was this early........ youtube had different logo
🤣🤣🤣🤣
@Sai Tejaswitha Chevula sorry
I didn,t get ur comment
Explain
@Sai Tejaswitha Chevula okay😅
Ted-ed videos have become, a way of entertainment. The presentation is marvellous; the designers have the ability to present gruesome facts with precise beauty. Bravo
Governments should intervene to provide the economic incentive for carbon capture technology.
Why? CO2 destroying the planet is bs. It's only being peddled to steal money on a wide scale for a "carbon tax" that does nothing.
@@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep Do you have any evidence that carbon dioxide does not cause climate change, please?
@@billyfox6368 Yes a study published showed during the pandemic the earth heated up because there was less CO2 and other emissions making the sky more clear and more sunlight reaching the earth. Water vapor is the major greenhouse gas not CO2. Climate is much closer tied to solar output. You're welcome.
@@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep Please will you get me a source for that?
Very interesting, informative and worthwhile video.
The title is likely gonna change...
The title is complete click bait. This is solely climate narrative bs with a very brief history on cement. Nothing to do with the title at all except some vague conjecture. Also it's moronic, they are complaining and demonizing one of the most essential life giving elements on the planet CO2 which is a byproduct of cement production. While ignoring there won't even be much cement production because of the lack of river sand. Which I'm sure TED has covered already. It's completely disingenuous editing and hijacking a whole video doing a bait and switch to push a narrative.
ted ed always manages to strike the perfect balance between fear and optimism for the future
"for every ton of concrete theirs a ton of co2"
Umm that's wrong so I'm gonna correct that so its for every mol of CaO made from CaCO3 their a mol of CO2 released. I mean how are you gonna get 2 tons from 1 ton of CaCO3, bro this is supposed to inform the public so how about a little error checking next time. Other than that good job.
3:08
@@nicholassaez4405 Was searching for this comment. Thank you 🙏
It says for every ton of concrete there is a ton of c02. Which means they've already used two tons of limestone. There is no mistake.
"I mean how are you gonna get 2 tons from 1 ton of CaCO3" - They didn't say that, they said for every ton of CaO you'll get a ton of CO2.
You're right about the incorrect unit though, they should've used a mole as opposed to a mass unit. But then you'd have to explain the concept of the mole to a bunch of people who have little/no chemistry knowledge.
Given the molecular weights are pretty similar (44 & 56 for CO2 & CaO respectively). It's still a pretty hefty amount of CO2 produced, around 0.8 tons of CO2 per ton of CaO if my math is right, so the point still stands IMO. Though maybe they should've just went with a statement like that instead of focussing on the equal amount (in molecules) of CaO & CO2 being produced..
@@valorificmirage I think they were trying to get across that you get equal amounts (in quantity, not mass) of CaO & CO2. Due to their molecular weights being a bit different, you'll get different masses of CaO & CO2 out.
This is what Ted-ed does :
Answers random questions we all wonder but never asked
So this is how Walls in AOT where made...
Maria!
Ted ed animation just keeps getting better
2:10 d- did the british guy say "aluminum" -
What’s he meant to say
The soundtrack for this video is so beautiful 🥺🥺
People think they can "stabilise" the climate... that's your first problem.
@Kishblock pro I mean the hubristic, anti-scientific, illogical "belief" that man has the ability to maintain a stable climate. We are feathers in a hurricane, who think we are masters of the Universe.
Welcome to the best educational channel on TH-cam.
Sky: The Children of Light
which song?
I LOVE THAT GAME
Bit of an error with the weight of CaO and CO2 as MW of CaO is 55 g/mol and MW of CO2 is 44 g/mol. When you make one tonne of CaO, you release slightly less CO2, about 0.8 tonne, from CaCO2 decomposition alone.
I don't see what the big uproar about going vegan is about. changing to renewable energy production is a more effective and more damaging thing to leave unchanged
Ted Ed aka the only online class I actually want to attend