Police gesture you to slow down… You continue to travel at almost 80mph in the lane next to them… Then suggest they need retraining when they pull you over, having already been reasonable by giving you an opportunity to slow down in the first place. Instant Karma for another ‘armchair lawyer’ 😂
"TheY'Re NoT AboVe ThE laW!" he cries, despite the police having exemptions from such laws when doing so for a policing purpose. So no, they're not above the law, but the law does afford them to be exempt from it.
5:00 unmarked black BMW Stop. What makes you think police motorway patrol officers don’t have frequent re-sits and refreshers to keep their abilities up to scratch, and maintain their license to conduct high speed chases and TPAC manoeuvres ? Like so many we see in this position, you knowingly broke the law and got caught, and you’re just pissed off. You admit speeding and argue it’s 10% +2mph before you get a tug! You failed the attitude test right there you absolute wet wipe! I’d like to hear the rest of the conversation where you started to argue about the speed limits, but you fast forwarded that part. Were you just too embarrassed that he tore you a new one to let us hear and enjoy it? Car speedos are actually set to read fast, so you DONT get done for speeding all the time. - 10%+3 was the rule in the 50’s and 60’s when most cars were British shite, with smiths approximeters used to give an “about that fast” reading.
@@ultra_vires so surprised he was caught when he knew he was doing well over the maximum of 70, even admitted it was around 79? why wouldn't you slow down after getting told to slow down
Yeah, the balls on the guy saying he was doing 79 and that’s ok. Just because automated enforcement tends not to prosecute below 10%+2 doesn’t mean they can’t, especially when the cop could check with his speedo. You can’t just say that you’re allowed to speed.
@engineeredlifeform That's a discretionary rule the police have you utter f uckwit. It's not written in law but a general rule that guarantees a prosecution if caught under those circumstance and police decide to do you. Think you need to resit your test because you don't seem to have a clue
Last one, what a tosser. Speeding & lane hogging yet has the temerity to complaine that the PO need retraining. IMHO everyone should have to repeat a refresher training and resit a driving test. Driving standards are terrible today and have been getting considerably worse. Most of us think we are the better driver, the reality is many of us are re no where near as good as we'd like to think we are
But the van driver could have used the bus lane as stated so why would the police expect him to change lanes. Sort of kills your argument instantly. 🤷♀️
@@FozzyZ28 Not really, the van was pulling out to avoid the cyclist at the start of the bus lane. Police driver closed the gap. If the Police driver didn't anticipate that then retraining is required in my opinion. I saw that move coming, no reason why the Police driver shouldn't. Like I said on my OP though, poor driving by both drivers.
The motorbike rider filming was so busy rubbernecking he didn't notice the traffic lights on the crossing had changed to Amber a long time before he rode through
I loved the last one, absolutely hilarious!! I'd have given him a ticket for his stupidity. 🤷♀️🤦♂️ 10 + 2???? Then has the ordasity to whinge about the officer not indicating. I'm guessing he got his licence off a cornflakes packet.
@@markgambrill 😂😂😂 I love the Grammar police!! 😁 Just imagine how many words, spellcheck or typos you get wrong???! an nobody really gives a shit!!???? Yet in your sad little universe you feel the need to correct a spelling or grammar mistake, 99.999% of the time..... I'm guessing that you have a micro dick or you fail in so many other ways , not a good look sunshine!!??? Smh!!!!!
@@FozzyZ28 I'm glad you are happy about it. Honestly didn't want to come across like the grammar police. Just want to help out. I actually had to look it up as it didn't look quite right.
@@markgambrill fella I've seen the most bizarre grammar and spelling over the past 20yrs but I really don't care, I/we knew what they meant, there's a small percentage of people that feel above us commoners, don't be that person Mark, some nasty people out there. I really don't care if I get a spelling wrong, I'm dyslexic (hope That's wright) If we'd appreciate being educated/ spell checked/ grammar policed, isn't there a weird place for that? ??! 😁👍
1:28 The van was ahead of the police car, there was a cyclist on the left, and there was a possibility that the van would want to avoid the bus lane (even though he didn't need to), so the policeman should have kept his distance to give the van a chance to move across. Poor hazard recognition by the policeman.
And whilst the motor cyclist laughed at the van's plight I bet hd would have been right hacked off if the van had come to a complete halt to allow the now impatient police car tryinv to get the lead then pull into the outer lane.
@@cafe405 And why would the copper assume that the van wasnt going to move out. I don't bother to look to see if bus lanes are or are not in operartion. I just keep out of them regardless. The copper was just palne ignorant. Tha van was still in front of the copper. The acceleration was just ignorant.
Even if it’s discretionary (with automated enforcement) you can’t just say that it’s ok to do 79 when the limit is 70. He was lucky he didn’t get a ticket.
Whoever is adding the comments at the bottom of these clips, especially the last entitled prat, needs to stop. If it's from this channel, poor effort to say the least. "Skid control"?????!!!!! Unbelievable
The van could have maintained it position and carried on into the bus lane as the bus lane was outside its then operational time slot 7.30am-10am. The merge in turn present was not in operation at that time. Had it have been today then the merge in turn would be in affect as the bus lanes are in operation 7am-6.40pm.
The clip with the white van. Agreed the van should have put the right indicator on as it was a merge in turn but the police car was trying to push in. The police car should have dropped back slightly because most people don't use their indicator so if the van didn't turn left then it was obvious from the bike riders perspective that the van was going straight on, therefore the police should have allowed for this instead of trying to push through
The driver complaining about the police being rude after pulling him over for traffic offences he knows full well he is committing can get off the roads right now!!!
I think he's got away with traffic offences for so long,He feels entitled and probably 40 years old or below most have this superior attitude towards authority as if they are solicitors and the police are servants,The advice about incriminating yourself is good advice,If they have evidence fare enough but don't supply them with it.
Once told to slow down I would have pulled in to a slower lane and dropped my speed until the police were well gone. But that entitled prick thought he was invincible.
2:01 What wasn't mentioned here is, although the van could have gone in the bus lane, he should have slowed down for the cyclist at the very least and the police car could have gone through. I'm amazed that the text written on the screen here penalises the van driver, and that there's no mention of the van avoiding the cyclist.
Last guy recorded himself being a bellend to an officer who had every right to pull him over and gave him not 1 but 2 warnings to slow down. Willingly admitted he was speeding incriminating himself, then still got mad and said a bunch of stuff about the police needing more driving courses? Seems like an entitled prick to me
5:30 - Cammer dug his own grave. Everyone knows the law isn't 10%+2. That is just the limit that the speed camera's have to account for margin of error. You can go through a camera under 10%+2 at a risk of being caught by the margin of error, but a cop can pull you over for 1mph over the limit. If you'd just owned up to it and not tried to challenge him it would have probably been a lot easier for you. Cop was nice enough to not give you a ticket just for your lack of knowledge of the law whilst trying to inform the cop. Additionally, undertaking is not an offence by any stretch of the imagination, and police are allowed to exceed the laws such as speeding whilst they are actively following, or interacting with a road user they intend to pull over.
Cammer came across as one of those dangerous people who think they know, in this case, the law but haven't a clue. The Police officer even gave him a chance by telling him to slow down prior to changing the message to follow me lol.
Second clip the cammer was so concentrating on the police car he missed that the traffic lights had turned amber and he should have stopped - he had plenty of time
How many people do you see on a motorway constantly driving in a centre lane when the inner ones are empty and have been empty for miles...... it happens far too much and just shows a very low standard of driving..... they all should be ticketed
@@CrazyMedic Yes, far, far too many. And it's all because driving lessons weren't allowed to be taken on motorways until very recently. So it's usually middle-aged people who don't see their wrongdoing. And thankfully the police have started cracking down on it and there have been plenty of people being given tickets for "driving without consideration for other road users" for lane hogging.
Like others have said, 10 + 2 is a guideline to account for underreading on your speedo - e.g. your speedo says you are going 70 but you are actually clocked going 75, it wouldnt feel fair if you got a ticket for a minor discrepency on your car that you couldn't possibly have known about. But that is a general guideline and if they think you were going over, they can still give you a ticket (although it gives a lot of wiggle room to dispute it in court). If you blatantly say to the police "I was going and indicated 79", you have just admitted to speeding. Worse, if your speedo is also underreading, you could have actually been going 85+.
Admitting to doing 79 is admitting to a motoring offence. Any tolerance is to ensure there is room for equipment error. Idiots admitting to speeding needs no tolerance to be applied.
Police a bit in the wrong there , at that particular junction with Bev Rd & Queens Rd , the van driver was in the correct lane to carry on down Bev Rd , however , the police were in the right hand lane which is a right turn only onto Queens Rd and they decided to go straight on 🤷♂️, so as the van driver correctly sets off and sees the approaching bus lane then has to move over , but the police have other ideas , they know he has to move over but they decide to make a race out of it and cause an issue , even though they were in the wrong lane at the start and abused the rules of the road for their own advantage 🙄, the police driver there should go see one of his traffic cop mates to get a few pointers I think 😬
That first one, the marked police Range Rover was MDP! Good luck to whoever gets pulled over by MDP... you must have been near some kind of military establishment
Probably shared use. It never used to be permitted to stop traffic in a non County etc. based police force. For example British Transport Police can patrol docks but not outside roads and still behave as if they were within their jurisdiction. We've Fire and Police combined vehicles. I have seen one stopped behind a car on a road with the cop having a word with the driver.
@@neddyseagoon9601 The BTP ceased to have a role in policing docks and harbours nearly 30 years ago! www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1994/8/section/1/enacted Their powers were further defined by - www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2001/24/section/100?timeline=true
@@maunsell24 I did say "never used to be permitted". Perhaps it would have been clearer if I'd also not said "can" but instead said, " could patrol docks". The point I was trying to make is that specific boundaries existed and many still do.
@@kevinrayner5812 As the left lane ended the Highway Code states you should indicate and filter in when safe to do so..... just because your in front does not immediately mean it’s your lane...... you are filtering
@@CrazyMedic Sometimes a bit of common sense should prevail. True the van did not indicate but even to a policeman surely it was obvious what was going on.
@@JohnM... I mean TPAC Traffic Pursuit and Containment, here in the UK it wouldn’t take long too call in asistance. I see your point about not stopping and I assume your in another country. Although here in the UK it would be met as in most countries in a robust manner. USA Stop Sticks, Pitted. UK TPAC or Stinger.
Love how commens on the last guy is like "deactivate the speed option, never incriminate yourself, don't answer questions like that etc". How about don't speed instead?
For anyone wondering what 10+2 means. It’s 10% leeway + 2 mph on most speed cameras in the uk. Why? Because no car has an accurate speedometer. This depends on road conditions, tyre thread and other factors. If you’re doing 70mph you’re only really doing about 66mph on average. For the police pulling him over is absolutely correct. Not petty at all. Middle lane hogging (which is illegal) There’s building up traffic ahead and doing 79mph isn’t really necessary. He got off lightly. The cop could have gave him a fine for driving without due care and attention.
Always nice to see police in the right place at the right time, there's a couple of TH-cam channels here in Australia that apart from a couple of videos each week about stupid drivers they also put out the "karma caught by police " type videos every couple of months & amazing how people do stupid things in front of police cars.🤔😂
7:15 doesn't matter if you deactivate the speed option on your dashcam, it is in the footage that you travelled from one point to another within a certain timeframe, speed can be calculated from that time and distance travelled
Correct, there have been several successful convictions where the defendant's speed has been calculated from dash cam or CCTV footage and the evidence was strong enough to convince magistrates.
@@bertalanlovasz7512 it's true, that was very petty by these police officers. Still. He did exceed the speed limit and therefore can't complain about being pulled over. Especially since he apparently got away with a warning and without a ticket.
@@arthur_p_dent no it wasn't petty the law is the law they will enforce it. The fact he was told to slow down and as far as I could see he really didn't react well. Also it was not petty as they just warned him even when he openly admitted to doing 10mph over the limit and assumed he was in the right .... So no not petty at all quite good of them tbh as if it had been a camera he would have a fine no questions.
@@TheIntronD Are you sure they didn't have a camera? Unmarked polica cars usually do. Also, the driver incriminated himself with that 10%+2mph talk. If they had wanted to fine him, they could have and his barrister would not have talked him out of it.
I'd have Pushed my Solicitor for a Court session. Driver was Overtaking In lane4 due to Ghost vehicles in lane 2 causing an Occupied lane3. Another Victimisation scenario Wasting Taxpayers time and money.
The video dates from about 2015 when the bus lane was in operation part time from 7.30am-10am before they changed to 7am-6.30pm during the first lockdown in 2020.
10 + 2. These people need to think where this comes from and is it law rather than calling out what the police are doing while observing you and giving you directions
Text moaning about the police when the black X5 on the M1 pulled the guy for speeding, He should have gotten a ticket for staying unnecessarily in lane 3. He just used lane 3 when lane 2 was free. Mansfield lad lol what a nob.
The cop supposedly pushed into traffic should have followed his training and been expecting the possibility of the inside lane having to avoid cyclists, he would fail his police driving course and his trying to push alongside only exaggerates his own impatience and OFFENSIVE driving technique that is frowned upon for the public by police trainers.
Flashing led lights on a bus lane sign when it's in force would be far more obvious from a far greater distance at little cost but then the bus lane revenue would come to a halt because cars with cloned plates don't pay up anyway.
That 4th clip. I've seen that happen near Leicester myself. A marked police car was used to force people into the correct lane. They seem quite keen on lane hogging in Leicestershire.
2:30: That cop car was at fault, not the van driver. That copper knew the van had to merge due to the bus only lane and just as the van was merging that copper very clearly speeds up instead of allowing the van to merge, that was intentionally on the fucking coppers part.
The bus lane on Beverley Road heading towards Hull city centre until 2020 had an operation time of 7.30am-10am and was open to all traffic to use until 7.30am the next day. It is sign posted at regular intervals along it length and the van driver would have seen at least 2 signs one before Sculcoates Lane junction and one just before where the bus lane starts. In the original post a few years ago it was said to have been 1.30pm, then the bus lane was open to all traffic and the van driver was allowed to use it without restrictions. The 1.5m rule at this time was not applicable and the van driver could have passed the cyclist leaving a reasonable gap. The merge in turn at this was was not in operation because it was outside the bus lanes operation time slot.
People who think the 10mph +2% or whatever are bloody delusional. To be driving at that speed 79mph, your speedometer in a modern car will be reading around 85mph, so he was driving at an indicated 80+mph holding the 3rd lane and whinges when he gets a warning....
Saying you don't know what speed you were doing is liable to get you booked for Driving Without Due Care, so don't say that if you pulled over. Just admit the offence if you are guilty, and you might be let off with a caution. Ignoring instructions is almost guaranteed to get you stopped!
Sorry but the guy getting pulled by the police and then arguing it's fine to do 80... The limits 70... Some police may choose not to pull you at 80 but he still has every right to ticket you , you are speeding.
the advice to always tell the police you thought you driving within the speed limit is dangerous advice. You say that to the wrong police officer on the wrong day and if he has evidence of you speeding you'll get a ticket for excessive speed and one for driving without due care, as you have just admitted to the police that you thought you were within the speed limit when you were not.
To be fair to the Endotec van, the police officer driving should have seen the cyclist and left room for the van, after all, they are apparently advanced drivers.
The van was correct it was the cop cars responsibility as he was the overtaking vehicle and would be aware of road markings. And the laughing motorcyclist clearly was not paying attention as he went through an amber
I know that bus lane in Hull and its awful. Very busy road, not that well signed, if you dont know the roads it could easily catch anyone out. The van driver also had the cyclist to concentrate on and a cop in his mirror. I'd probably have screwed up there tbf. I hope he just got a bit of roadside education, it didn't deserve a ticket.
Arguing speed limits and %ages over is asking, (in inclement weather or heavy traffic conditions, pedestrians in the road, low sun etc), for an upgrade to driving without consideration for others. There's also the concept of "appropriate use of speed". Learners for example might fail for inappropriate use of speed and complain they never once went over the limits. While not registering their close call with a pedestrian while only doing 25mph.
Man I laughed at the "cammer" who gets salty because he got caught speeding. Bud,some advice if you get caught own it. You passed the red car at more than the national speed limit, your own words. Don't get all upset because a cop did their job. I travel the M1 often between Northampton and Leicester, and it is so common that guys like yourself shoot along at 80-85 mph on that stretch. It should really come as no surprise to see cops now patrolling that section.
I was on a 40 MPH road that changed to a national speed limit dual carriageway I was on a motorcycle so pulled into the overtaking lane and accelerated to pass a line of cars. The front car matched my speed then pulled into my lane. Luckily there was a junction on my right with a slip road that gave me room to escape. On the other carriageway coming towards us was a police car. They pulled through the junction with blues and twos and gave chase and caught the car. He pled guilty in court and got a two year ban with heavy fine.
Oh Dear. A simple case of being pissed (annoyed) because you got caught. Starting of by indicating you were going a little Fast.... GUILTY. As for this allowed speed Limit being Speed + 10% plus 2 is NOT law. Speeding is classed as an absolute offence. You either are or your Not. Most UK car Speedo’s indicate HIGH. You can be doing 60 indicated on the cars Speedo but actually on a calibrated device (similar to the ones used by the Police) your actual speed would be around 57 -58. Secondly never argue with a policeman about speed... I think you were very lucky not to get a ticket. SPEED KILLS don’t want a ticket. They are very easy too avoid. DONT SPEED. As for informing viewers too disable the speed info on a DashCam, could be seen as an attempt to pervert the course of justice. Although a minor one
'Speed kills' is a lazy reduction of the problem. Low speed on a motorway is considerably more dangerous than high. At least once per week on my way to work I see cars doing 40 on the slip road that either come to a complete stop and cause headaches for everyone behind them or pull out and cause havoc in lane 1. Speed doesn't kill, crap driving does. There is only one worse catch phrase on the road: 'Think, bike' as if it only applies to drivers with more than two wheels.
@@nikmachen6561 It was a general statement. I agree I see many poor drivers joining a motorway or dual-carriage way from the slip road without gathering speed and I agree this is dangerous but speed gives you less time too react. It is never a solution
@@CrazyMedic motorways about to merge. You’re approaching doing 70 with no one in front on your side. On the other side there’s multiple cars but with acres of space in front of the pack. In this situation the safest thing by far is to temporarily increase your speed (I.e. above 70) and get into that space, rather than having to try and fit into a cluster of cars.
@@nikmachen6561' low speed on a motorway is considerably more dangerous than high.' How on earth do you think that? If your tyre blows at 100mph do you think you would have a better chance of survival than if it blew at 60mph? Sounds like you need a little education.
1:31 biker starts passing on the left a police car that may pull the van over! Police driver should have stayed behind the van & puts on blue lights next to the bike
Slow day for notts police pulling someone over for 79. Should report them for poor lane discipline and not indicating. Also should've claimed an indicated 72 or so when they "glanced down", sorry for straying over etc.
I think he was very polite talking to the police. The police can judge that he has good character and gave him the benefit of the doubt....( the other scenario was when the cop spoke to the other cop in the car. Asking should we give this driver shit? The colleague may have said no let's go to M&S for a coffee!) Were as other folks would give the police attitude which gets no results.
7.18 piss poor planning. He’d been told to slow down. Therefore it was unlikely he’d pass plod after that so why did he just sit there in the lane next to him? If you’re not actively passing you need to ge in the lane to your left.
2nd clip police driver deliberately caused a problem. Rather than merging in turn he sped up at the critical point to cause the interaction. Fragile ego copper.
2nd clip van driver should of indicated that's the only thing he did wrong the police car should of stayed back it was clearly marked as merge in lane from left, the police where at fault.
Seriously, what was the white van driver supposed to do? If you ask me, it was the police car woefully at fault there. As for the last one, jeez, it wasn't so long ago that the motorway speed limit was planned to increase to 80 mph! Curious how continental countries have motorway speed limits way over ours, but if we dare to drive at an alleged 79 mph we are "maniacs". Really doesn't add up if you ask me.
At 3:01, the blue car did accelerate a bit fast but really he did nothing wrong, all he was doing was closing up to the car in front because the black car was turning right on the outer lane.
jesus I cringed when he said 10 +2. Yes you probably never get a ticket for that speed but you dont go saying thats the reason. You say sorry I wasnt ware my speed had crept up while overtaking and take the words of wisdom. If someone said 10+2 when I give them a tug, its going to be a ticket everytime.
03:39 onwards, no excuse for ignoring or not understanding motorway signage, you have a licence to keep and the best way to do it is to obey all relevant road traffic signage and commands and not to bitch about the fact that you got caught which translates as I got caught for speeding and I had to face the consequences.
At 2:18, the van driver should have waited anyway because he was not in a position to give the cyclist the legal amount of space, he also did not indicate that he intended to take the right lane.
Police gesture you to slow down… You continue to travel at almost 80mph in the lane next to them… Then suggest they need retraining when they pull you over, having already been reasonable by giving you an opportunity to slow down in the first place. Instant Karma for another ‘armchair lawyer’ 😂
"TheY'Re NoT AboVe ThE laW!" he cries, despite the police having exemptions from such laws when doing so for a policing purpose. So no, they're not above the law, but the law does afford them to be exempt from it.
KEEP LEFT! First rule of the road and my bicycle had stabalisers when I learned it. I was 6!
he was speeding first, then didn’t move over and was given ample time and hogged the third lane before getting pulled over, terrible driving
5:00 unmarked black BMW Stop. What makes you think police motorway patrol officers don’t have frequent re-sits and refreshers to keep their abilities up to scratch, and maintain their license to conduct high speed chases and TPAC manoeuvres ?
Like so many we see in this position, you knowingly broke the law and got caught, and you’re just pissed off. You admit speeding and argue it’s 10% +2mph before you get a tug! You failed the attitude test right there you absolute wet wipe!
I’d like to hear the rest of the conversation where you started to argue about the speed limits, but you fast forwarded that part. Were you just too embarrassed that he tore you a new one to let us hear and enjoy it?
Car speedos are actually set to read fast, so you DONT get done for speeding all the time. - 10%+3 was the rule in the 50’s and 60’s when most cars were British shite, with smiths approximeters used to give an “about that fast” reading.
@@ultra_vires so surprised he was caught when he knew he was doing well over the maximum of 70, even admitted it was around 79?
why wouldn't you slow down after getting told to slow down
Comments from the guy pulled by the Police BMW strikes me as just pissed he got caught. Police were very reasonable in that case.
Yeah, the balls on the guy saying he was doing 79 and that’s ok. Just because automated enforcement tends not to prosecute below 10%+2 doesn’t mean they can’t, especially when the cop could check with his speedo. You can’t just say that you’re allowed to speed.
@@Durzel So true, to say you where doing 79mph in a 70 is just incriminating yourself 😮
Yeah he was totally in the wrong. The police officer even tried to warn him to slow down before pulling him but he chose not to so.... TOTW for me
@@Durzel Yup, how many armchair lawyers spout the 10%+2 thing when it's not written in statute anywhere. 31mph in a 30 could get someone done.
@engineeredlifeform That's a discretionary rule the police have you utter f uckwit. It's not written in law but a general rule that guarantees a prosecution if caught under those circumstance and police decide to do you. Think you need to resit your test because you don't seem to have a clue
That last guy is just in his own world. 10mph over and just sat chilling in the middle lane like a lemon..
Last one, what a tosser. Speeding & lane hogging yet has the temerity to complaine that the PO need retraining.
IMHO everyone should have to repeat a refresher training and resit a driving test. Driving standards are terrible today and have been getting considerably worse. Most of us think we are the better driver, the reality is many of us are re no where near as good as we'd like to think we are
10+1
2nd clip. Van driver, ideally, should've indicated. However, the Police driver should've backed off to avoid that situation. IMO poor driving by both.
Good to see someone reflect my exact thought in a top comment. Sensible drivers exist!
But the van driver could have used the bus lane as stated so why would the police expect him to change lanes. Sort of kills your argument instantly. 🤷♀️
@@FozzyZ28 Not really, the van was pulling out to avoid the cyclist at the start of the bus lane. Police driver closed the gap. If the Police driver didn't anticipate that then retraining is required in my opinion. I saw that move coming, no reason why the Police driver shouldn't. Like I said on my OP though, poor driving by both drivers.
The motorbike rider filming was so busy rubbernecking he didn't notice the traffic lights on the crossing had changed to Amber a long time before he rode through
That is even an old clip maybe 2008 look at the old model focus the police are driving
I loved the last one, absolutely hilarious!! I'd have given him a ticket for his stupidity. 🤷♀️🤦♂️ 10 + 2???? Then has the ordasity to whinge about the officer not indicating. I'm guessing he got his licence off a cornflakes packet.
*audacity
@@markgambrill 😂😂😂 I love the Grammar police!! 😁 Just imagine how many words, spellcheck or typos you get wrong???! an nobody really gives a shit!!???? Yet in your sad little universe you feel the need to correct a spelling or grammar mistake, 99.999% of the time..... I'm guessing that you have a micro dick or you fail in so many other ways , not a good look sunshine!!???
Smh!!!!!
@@FozzyZ28 I'm glad you are happy about it. Honestly didn't want to come across like the grammar police. Just want to help out. I actually had to look it up as it didn't look quite right.
@@markgambrill fella I've seen the most bizarre grammar and spelling over the past 20yrs but I really don't care, I/we knew what they meant, there's a small percentage of people that feel above us commoners, don't be that person Mark, some nasty people out there. I really don't care if I get a spelling wrong, I'm dyslexic (hope That's wright)
If we'd appreciate being educated/ spell checked/ grammar policed, isn't there a weird place for that? ??! 😁👍
@@FozzyZ28 love you too
1:28 The van was ahead of the police car, there was a cyclist on the left, and there was a possibility that the van would want to avoid the bus lane (even though he didn't need to), so the policeman should have kept his distance to give the van a chance to move across. Poor hazard recognition by the policeman.
Agreed. Not to mention the Police car not doing the recommended merge in turn, rather tried to jump the van and failed.
And whilst the motor cyclist laughed at the van's plight I bet hd would have been right hacked off if the van had come to a complete halt to allow the now impatient police car tryinv to get the lead then pull into the outer lane.
Indicators exist for a reason. The copper likely couldn't see the cyclist so wasn't expecting the van to avoid a bus lane that wasn't in use.
@@cafe405 And why would the copper assume that the van wasnt going to move out. I don't bother to look to see if bus lanes are or are not in operartion. I just keep out of them regardless. The copper was just palne ignorant. Tha van was still in front of the copper. The acceleration was just ignorant.
@@cafe405 exactly!!!! 🤦♂️ Van 100% wrong on many counts.....
3:03 did the copper just hit the other car?? 😂😂
No.
Yep
Maybe 🤣
@@johnvarley4561 yes 100%, you see the blue Focus moving from the small impact.
Yes 🤣😂🤣😂🤣
Yet again another Copper🤡🤡 that cannot Drive properly.
Safe Stopping Distances 🤯🤯
Oh dear. Clip #4 caught out by the 10% + 2. That's just a guideline that some forces follow at their discretion, it's not the law.
And to be caught at 79 mph, his speedo was probably showing 85 mph.
Even if it’s discretionary (with automated enforcement) you can’t just say that it’s ok to do 79 when the limit is 70. He was lucky he didn’t get a ticket.
@@markperry4076correct. Would be interesting to know what car the cammer was in. German perhaps ?
Whoever is adding the comments at the bottom of these clips, especially the last entitled prat, needs to stop.
If it's from this channel, poor effort to say the least.
"Skid control"?????!!!!! Unbelievable
Police on the second clip could of slowed and let the van merge, the van was ahead to start with
The van could have maintained it position and carried on into the bus lane as the bus lane was outside its then operational time slot 7.30am-10am. The merge in turn present was not in operation at that time. Had it have been today then the merge in turn would be in affect as the bus lanes are in operation 7am-6.40pm.
Mate at 3:32 was given plenty of opportunity to avoid the interaction and still got pulled over. Nobody else to blame there
The clip with the white van. Agreed the van should have put the right indicator on as it was a merge in turn but the police car was trying to push in. The police car should have dropped back slightly because most people don't use their indicator so if the van didn't turn left then it was obvious from the bike riders perspective that the van was going straight on, therefore the police should have allowed for this instead of trying to push through
5:20 - the police vehicle siganalled every lane change. It's difficult to see because the video has been speeded up.
He probably wouldnt see the indication due to his poor observation.
If he can't see a flashing slow down sign. He isn't going to see an indicator.
SPED
I love the start of his video`s "we are here with a new wideo". Makes me smile every time, don`t change it though.
Black undercover nearly rear ended that focus 😂
The driver complaining about the police being rude after pulling him over for traffic offences he knows full well he is committing can get off the roads right now!!!
I think he's got away with traffic offences for so long,He feels entitled and probably 40 years old or below most have this superior attitude towards authority as if they are solicitors and the police are servants,The advice about incriminating yourself is good advice,If they have evidence fare enough but don't supply them with it.
Once told to slow down I would have pulled in to a slower lane and dropped my speed until the police were well gone. But that entitled prick thought he was invincible.
2:01 What wasn't mentioned here is, although the van could have gone in the bus lane, he should have slowed down for the cyclist at the very least and the police car could have gone through. I'm amazed that the text written on the screen here penalises the van driver, and that there's no mention of the van avoiding the cyclist.
Last guy recorded himself being a bellend to an officer who had every right to pull him over and gave him not 1 but 2 warnings to slow down. Willingly admitted he was speeding incriminating himself, then still got mad and said a bunch of stuff about the police needing more driving courses? Seems like an entitled prick to me
5:30 - Cammer dug his own grave. Everyone knows the law isn't 10%+2. That is just the limit that the speed camera's have to account for margin of error. You can go through a camera under 10%+2 at a risk of being caught by the margin of error, but a cop can pull you over for 1mph over the limit. If you'd just owned up to it and not tried to challenge him it would have probably been a lot easier for you. Cop was nice enough to not give you a ticket just for your lack of knowledge of the law whilst trying to inform the cop.
Additionally, undertaking is not an offence by any stretch of the imagination, and police are allowed to exceed the laws such as speeding whilst they are actively following, or interacting with a road user they intend to pull over.
And they gave him an option signing him to slow down!
Cammer came across as one of those dangerous people who think they know, in this case, the law but haven't a clue. The Police officer even gave him a chance by telling him to slow down prior to changing the message to follow me lol.
3rd video Just stop speeding and go on about your day, end off...
Second clip the cammer was so concentrating on the police car he missed that the traffic lights had turned amber and he should have stopped - he had plenty of time
6:35 probably informing the driver that lane hogging is a driving offence.
How many people do you see on a motorway constantly driving in a centre lane when the inner ones are empty and have been empty for miles...... it happens far too much and just shows a very low standard of driving..... they all should be ticketed
@@CrazyMedic Yes, far, far too many. And it's all because driving lessons weren't allowed to be taken on motorways until very recently. So it's usually middle-aged people who don't see their wrongdoing. And thankfully the police have started cracking down on it and there have been plenty of people being given tickets for "driving without consideration for other road users" for lane hogging.
Like others have said, 10 + 2 is a guideline to account for underreading on your speedo - e.g. your speedo says you are going 70 but you are actually clocked going 75, it wouldnt feel fair if you got a ticket for a minor discrepency on your car that you couldn't possibly have known about. But that is a general guideline and if they think you were going over, they can still give you a ticket (although it gives a lot of wiggle room to dispute it in court).
If you blatantly say to the police "I was going and indicated 79", you have just admitted to speeding. Worse, if your speedo is also underreading, you could have actually been going 85+.
Another great 'wideo" - thanks Dashflix!
Admitting to doing 79 is admitting to a motoring offence. Any tolerance is to ensure there is room for equipment error. Idiots admitting to speeding needs no tolerance to be applied.
10 + 2 😂 what a fool
4:00 Just pissed at being caught! You can imagine him going home and crying in his dinner!
The X3 shit em selves when the copper lit up. They were on the verge of playing silly buggers and knew it.
Police a bit in the wrong there , at that particular junction with Bev Rd & Queens Rd , the van driver was in the correct lane to carry on down Bev Rd , however , the police were in the right hand lane which is a right turn only onto Queens Rd and they decided to go straight on 🤷♂️, so as the van driver correctly sets off and sees the approaching bus lane then has to move over , but the police have other ideas , they know he has to move over but they decide to make a race out of it and cause an issue , even though they were in the wrong lane at the start and abused the rules of the road for their own advantage 🙄, the police driver there should go see one of his traffic cop mates to get a few pointers I think 😬
That first one, the marked police Range Rover was MDP! Good luck to whoever gets pulled over by MDP... you must have been near some kind of military establishment
Borden is a military housing and station
Probably shared use. It never used to be permitted to stop traffic in a non County etc. based police force. For example British Transport Police can patrol docks but not outside roads and still behave as if they were within their jurisdiction.
We've Fire and Police combined vehicles. I have seen one stopped behind a car on a road with the cop having a word with the driver.
@@neddyseagoon9601 The BTP ceased to have a role in policing docks and harbours nearly 30 years ago!
www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1994/8/section/1/enacted
Their powers were further defined by - www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2001/24/section/100?timeline=true
@@maunsell24 I did say "never used to be permitted". Perhaps it would have been clearer if I'd also not said "can" but instead said, " could patrol docks".
The point I was trying to make is that specific boundaries existed and many still do.
Why do people come online for vindication of ambiguous driving. It often plays out in the opposite way the cammer hopes.
Biker chuckles to himself about cop and then runs an Amber light on a crossing. Hero.
The 10+2 guy was getting mixed up its generally 10% over the police will consider pulling you over depending on how you drive conditions etc etc
Dont tell me the driver of the police car did't know that the road narrowed from 2 to one lane and yet the police car deliberately o
Overtook when the van was in front. Clear bad driving by the police in my view.
@@kevinrayner5812 As the left lane ended the Highway Code states you should indicate and filter in when safe to do so..... just because your in front does not immediately mean it’s your lane...... you are filtering
@@CrazyMedic Sometimes a bit of common sense should prevail. True the van did not indicate but even to a policeman surely it was obvious what was going on.
@@kevinrayner5812 I guess the cop just wanted a reason too pull him and got it…..
@@CrazyMedic I think so too. Took him long enough to decide though. Must have been a quiet day with nothing serious to deal with.
3.32: What a f*cking plank!
Warned enough times, then has the temerity to criticise the Policeman's driving.
What a 🔔
The vast majority of Range Rover/Discovery etc drivers think the speed limits don't apply to them.
Hear hear!
Don't know, but if I saw ANY car flashing 'follow me' - i would not. There's no knowing if it's legitimate.
That’s Ok but you would get TPAC’d
@@CrazyMedic dyou mean ‘pitted’? Or boxed in? I mean if it’s a single car I wouldn’t.
@@JohnM... I mean TPAC Traffic Pursuit and Containment, here in the UK it wouldn’t take long too call in asistance. I see your point about not stopping and I assume your in another country. Although here in the UK it would be met as in most countries in a robust manner. USA Stop Sticks, Pitted. UK TPAC or Stinger.
The cop should have been arrested for noise pollution after listening to Arctic Monkeys.
Love how commens on the last guy is like "deactivate the speed option, never incriminate yourself, don't answer questions like that etc".
How about don't speed instead?
3:00 Alexisonfire, Polaroids Of Polar Bears, My man! Impeccable taste.
For anyone wondering what 10+2 means. It’s 10% leeway + 2 mph on most speed cameras in the uk. Why? Because no car has an accurate speedometer. This depends on road conditions, tyre thread and other factors. If you’re doing 70mph you’re only really doing about 66mph on average.
For the police pulling him over is absolutely correct. Not petty at all. Middle lane hogging (which is illegal) There’s building up traffic ahead and doing 79mph isn’t really necessary. He got off lightly. The cop could have gave him a fine for driving without due care and attention.
Always nice to see police in the right place at the right time, there's a couple of TH-cam channels here in Australia that apart from a couple of videos each week about stupid drivers they also put out the "karma caught by police " type videos every couple of months & amazing how people do stupid things in front of police cars.🤔😂
At 2:52 on biker. Amber light was showing at traffic lights just after the police.
10% + 2 is more a guide for them to allow for discrepancies in calibration. So when they pull you over you’re screwed.
7:15 doesn't matter if you deactivate the speed option on your dashcam, it is in the footage that you travelled from one point to another within a certain timeframe, speed can be calculated from that time and distance travelled
Correct, there have been several successful convictions where the defendant's speed has been calculated from dash cam or CCTV footage and the evidence was strong enough to convince magistrates.
Edit down the vids..
it's boring and far too long...
that range rover speeding vid could have been all of 15 seconds...
I respect your opinion bro, but sometimes I have to keep it long, sometimes it's the opposite.
Rule one on the road. Don't drive like a prick. Limits are there to keep everyone safe. No-one is immortal.
3:37 "I was aware that my speed limit was above 70mph" - Well no, if your speed limit had been above 70, there would have been no problem.
Yeah this was such a crime ... every second car is lane hogging, but this fucker slightly over the limit. Oh ffs...so sick of this shit
@@bertalanlovasz7512 it's true, that was very petty by these police officers. Still. He did exceed the speed limit and therefore can't complain about being pulled over. Especially since he apparently got away with a warning and without a ticket.
@@arthur_p_dent no it wasn't petty the law is the law they will enforce it. The fact he was told to slow down and as far as I could see he really didn't react well. Also it was not petty as they just warned him even when he openly admitted to doing 10mph over the limit and assumed he was in the right .... So no not petty at all quite good of them tbh as if it had been a camera he would have a fine no questions.
@@TheIntronD Are you sure they didn't have a camera? Unmarked polica cars usually do.
Also, the driver incriminated himself with that 10%+2mph talk. If they had wanted to fine him, they could have and his barrister would not have talked him out of it.
I'd have Pushed my Solicitor for a Court session.
Driver was Overtaking In lane4 due to Ghost vehicles in lane 2 causing an Occupied lane3.
Another Victimisation scenario Wasting Taxpayers time and money.
2nd one, first of all it's centre not center and how old is that police car? Is it an old clip i wonder.
judging by its number plate, registered in 2010 or early 2011. Good catch, I wouldn't have paid attention to that.
The video dates from about 2015 when the bus lane was in operation part time from 7.30am-10am before they changed to 7am-6.30pm during the first lockdown in 2020.
10 + 2. These people need to think where this comes from and is it law rather than calling out what the police are doing while observing you and giving you directions
Text moaning about the police when the black X5 on the M1 pulled the guy for speeding, He should have gotten a ticket for staying unnecessarily in lane 3. He just used lane 3 when lane 2 was free.
Mansfield lad lol what a nob.
The cop supposedly pushed into traffic should have followed his training and been expecting the possibility of the inside lane having to avoid cyclists, he would fail his police driving course and his trying to push alongside only exaggerates his own impatience and OFFENSIVE driving technique that is frowned upon for the public by police trainers.
Typical biker, to busy laughing at the van to notice the pedestrian crossing light on amber.
Makes no attempt to slow down
The police car nearly harassed the van into running over a cyclist in the bus lane. That policeman needs a lesson in courtesy.
Flashing led lights on a bus lane sign when it's in force would be far more obvious from a far greater distance at little cost but then the bus lane revenue would come to a halt because cars with cloned plates don't pay up anyway.
Last clip…….why was the police traffic officer standing close to a LIVE lane with no Hi Vis jacket on ???? Total recipe for disaster
That 4th clip. I've seen that happen near Leicester myself. A marked police car was used to force people into the correct lane. They seem quite keen on lane hogging in Leicestershire.
10% +2 maybe but it never was speed limit plus 10mph plus another 2. Dream on sunshine.
2:30: That cop car was at fault, not the van driver. That copper knew the van had to merge due to the bus only lane and just as the van was merging that copper very clearly speeds up instead of allowing the van to merge, that was intentionally on the fucking coppers part.
The bus lane on Beverley Road heading towards Hull city centre until 2020 had an operation time of 7.30am-10am and was open to all traffic to use until 7.30am the next day. It is sign posted at regular intervals along it length and the van driver would have seen at least 2 signs one before Sculcoates Lane junction and one just before where the bus lane starts. In the original post a few years ago it was said to have been 1.30pm, then the bus lane was open to all traffic and the van driver was allowed to use it without restrictions. The 1.5m rule at this time was not applicable and the van driver could have passed the cyclist leaving a reasonable gap. The merge in turn at this was was not in operation because it was outside the bus lanes operation time slot.
Either way the copper clearly sped up as the van came over, notn wartranted and to me still says the copper was just looking to pull someone over.
People who think the 10mph +2% or whatever are bloody delusional.
To be driving at that speed 79mph, your speedometer in a modern car will be reading around 85mph, so he was driving at an indicated 80+mph holding the 3rd lane and whinges when he gets a warning....
2:55 It looked like the cam car was trying to cut the blue car off
We heere with new wideeo
Saying you don't know what speed you were doing is liable to get you booked for Driving Without Due Care, so don't say that if you pulled over. Just admit the offence if you are guilty, and you might be let off with a caution. Ignoring instructions is almost guaranteed to get you stopped!
Another new WIDEO 😂😂😂
They can break laws like speeding in order to control traffic or to instruct drivers. Retraining... 😂
If you are speeding and the cops catch you speeding, just admit it ffs!🤣
81 -11 equals 70 mph, i think!?
Police car was to blame at the filter lane as he intentionally sped up to attempt to block as the van was always in front of him
Sorry but the guy getting pulled by the police and then arguing it's fine to do 80...
The limits 70... Some police may choose not to pull you at 80 but he still has every right to ticket you , you are speeding.
the advice to always tell the police you thought you driving within the speed limit is dangerous advice. You say that to the wrong police officer on the wrong day and if he has evidence of you speeding you'll get a ticket for excessive speed and one for driving without due care, as you have just admitted to the police that you thought you were within the speed limit when you were not.
To be fair to the Endotec van, the police officer driving should have seen the cyclist and left room for the van, after all, they are apparently advanced drivers.
The van was correct it was the cop cars responsibility as he was the overtaking vehicle and would be aware of road markings. And the laughing motorcyclist clearly was not paying attention as he went through an amber
I know that bus lane in Hull and its awful. Very busy road, not that well signed, if you dont know the roads it could easily catch anyone out. The van driver also had the cyclist to concentrate on and a cop in his mirror. I'd probably have screwed up there tbf. I hope he just got a bit of roadside education, it didn't deserve a ticket.
10% +1 or 2 is just a guideline they can do you for doing 71 in a 70
Arguing speed limits and %ages over is asking, (in inclement weather or heavy traffic conditions, pedestrians in the road, low sun etc), for an upgrade to driving without consideration for others. There's also the concept of "appropriate use of speed". Learners for example might fail for inappropriate use of speed and complain they never once went over the limits. While not registering their close call with a pedestrian while only doing 25mph.
Man I laughed at the "cammer" who gets salty because he got caught speeding. Bud,some advice if you get caught own it. You passed the red car at more than the national speed limit, your own words. Don't get all upset because a cop did their job. I travel the M1 often between Northampton and Leicester, and it is so common that guys like yourself shoot along at 80-85 mph on that stretch. It should really come as no surprise to see cops now patrolling that section.
I was on a 40 MPH road that changed to a national speed limit dual carriageway I was on a motorcycle so pulled into the overtaking lane and accelerated to pass a line of cars. The front car matched my speed then pulled into my lane. Luckily there was a junction on my right with a slip road that gave me room to escape. On the other carriageway coming towards us was a police car. They pulled through the junction with blues and twos and gave chase and caught the car. He pled guilty in court and got a two year ban with heavy fine.
Best wideo's on yt
Another Wideo... yay!
Not even that bad on first he laughing at speeding who cares catch us first 🤣
Oh Dear. A simple case of being pissed (annoyed) because you got caught. Starting of by indicating you were going a little Fast.... GUILTY. As for this allowed speed Limit being Speed + 10% plus 2 is NOT law. Speeding is classed as an absolute offence. You either are or your Not. Most UK car Speedo’s indicate HIGH. You can be doing 60 indicated on the cars Speedo but actually on a calibrated device (similar to the ones used by the Police) your actual speed would be around 57 -58. Secondly never argue with a policeman about speed... I think you were very lucky not to get a ticket. SPEED KILLS don’t want a ticket. They are very easy too avoid. DONT SPEED. As for informing viewers too disable the speed info on a DashCam, could be seen as an attempt to pervert the course of justice. Although a minor one
'Speed kills' is a lazy reduction of the problem. Low speed on a motorway is considerably more dangerous than high. At least once per week on my way to work I see cars doing 40 on the slip road that either come to a complete stop and cause headaches for everyone behind them or pull out and cause havoc in lane 1. Speed doesn't kill, crap driving does.
There is only one worse catch phrase on the road: 'Think, bike' as if it only applies to drivers with more than two wheels.
@@nikmachen6561 It was a general statement. I agree I see many poor drivers joining a motorway or dual-carriage way from the slip road without gathering speed and I agree this is dangerous but speed gives you less time too react. It is never a solution
@@nikmachen6561 Do you have have any objective evidence to back up that claim or is it just your opinion and personal observation?
@@CrazyMedic motorways about to merge. You’re approaching doing 70 with no one in front on your side. On the other side there’s multiple cars but with acres of space in front of the pack. In this situation the safest thing by far is to temporarily increase your speed (I.e. above 70) and get into that space, rather than having to try and fit into a cluster of cars.
@@nikmachen6561' low speed on a motorway is considerably more dangerous than high.' How on earth do you think that? If your tyre blows at 100mph do you think you would have a better chance of survival than if it blew at 60mph? Sounds like you need a little education.
1:31 biker starts passing on the left a police car that may pull the van over! Police driver should have stayed behind the van & puts on blue lights next to the bike
Slow day for notts police pulling someone over for 79. Should report them for poor lane discipline and not indicating. Also should've claimed an indicated 72 or so when they "glanced down", sorry for straying over etc.
I think he was very polite talking to the police. The police can judge that he has good character and gave him the benefit of the doubt....( the other scenario was when the cop spoke to the other cop in the car. Asking should we give this driver shit? The colleague may have said no let's go to M&S for a coffee!) Were as other folks would give the police attitude which gets no results.
Brianstorm!! First clip
The second clip the van driver was perfectly right you merge in turn the police should know this rather than try and push in typical police
Nice to hear a bit of alexisonfire at 3:00
UK so called cops have one law & regulations for them & another one for the public. Or so they think. 🤔🤔🤔🤔😠😡
5:29 the police officer was indicating
02:53 you did run a very late amber at a crossing here
7.18 piss poor planning.
He’d been told to slow down. Therefore it was unlikely he’d pass plod after that so why did he just sit there in the lane next to him? If you’re not actively passing you need to ge in the lane to your left.
2nd clip police driver deliberately caused a problem. Rather than merging in turn he sped up at the critical point to cause the interaction. Fragile ego copper.
2nd clip van driver should of indicated that's the only thing he did wrong the police car should of stayed back it was clearly marked as merge in lane from left, the police where at fault.
Seriously, what was the white van driver supposed to do? If you ask me, it was the police car woefully at fault there. As for the last one, jeez, it wasn't so long ago that the motorway speed limit was planned to increase to 80 mph! Curious how continental countries have motorway speed limits way over ours, but if we dare to drive at an alleged 79 mph we are "maniacs". Really doesn't add up if you ask me.
It is actually a very bad design when 2 lanes become 1 lane. If this is made to make room for a bus lane is just worse
At 3:01, the blue car did accelerate a bit fast but really he did nothing wrong, all he was doing was closing up to the car in front because the black car was turning right on the outer lane.
Never tell police your speed mate lol it is their job to tell you it.
jesus I cringed when he said 10 +2. Yes you probably never get a ticket for that speed but you dont go saying thats the reason. You say sorry I wasnt ware my speed had crept up while overtaking and take the words of wisdom. If someone said 10+2 when I give them a tug, its going to be a ticket everytime.
Love your wideo !!!!!!!😂😂😂😂😂
03:39 onwards, no excuse for ignoring or not understanding motorway signage, you have a licence to keep and the best way to do it is to obey all relevant road traffic signage and commands and not to bitch about the fact that you got caught which translates as I got caught for speeding and I had to face the consequences.
At 2:18, the van driver should have waited anyway because he was not in a position to give the cyclist the legal amount of space, he also did not indicate that he intended to take the right lane.