The economy of Bharat is very great thanking to PM Modi ji wise decision of supporting sir Putin and buying his oil! While stupid west refusing to buy Russia oil!! Jai Hind!! Jai shree Putin!!!!!!!!
The economy of Bharat is very great thanking to PM Modi ji wise decision of supporting sir Putin and buying his oil! While stupid west refusing to buy Russia oil!! Jai Hind!! Jai shree Putin!!!!!!!!
Yes please.. thanks for saying that.. India that is Bharat was never a poor country is not and will not be. They serve frozen food in the British railways, the Indian railways prepares fresh meals that is affordable to passengers traveling the cheapest seat. Indians were kept poor for 3 centuries, India was never poor.
India and UK will be together forever. UK ruled India for approximately 200 years and now India is gonna to rule UK back. What a lovely relationship it is
Yes, then England will a Slump like India. Concentrate on your Domestic Policy, before you fantasize about that. Cows still roam on your streets, sh"""ing everywhere heck even People are sh"""ing everywhere. Your Country is dirty and backwatered,whilst England is dominating with a naturally Industralized Economy.
Britain is not harmed by these investments. They are harmed by 1. Growing Muslim population 2. Extreme Socialism which has made bulk of the population lazy and take benefits without contributing.
The economy of Bharat is very great thanking to PM Modi ji wise decision of supporting sir Putin and buying his oil! While stupid west refusing to buy Russia oil!! Jai Hind!! Jai shree Putin!!!!!!!!
@@CCrux-ytperhaps you should get your facts right before feeling all that excited.... in 2011 Indian Govt categorically said we don't want your aid.... official statement - "Pranab Mukherjee and other Indian ministers tried to terminate Britain’s aid to their booming country last year - but relented after the British begged them to keep taking the money", The Sunday Telegraph can reveal.
Your aid money which we had rejected several times is an affront to our past wounds .... so if Britain has an iota of shame .. they should apologise to the country for what they done....
It's a ground fact that UKs economy only developed during its colonial rule, after Britain left India, its economic development slowed and today it is reaching stagnation.
British salt is now owned by TATA an Indian company which has its 66% shares owned by a non profit foundation. Nothing can match this.. Jamshedji TATA thank you.. btw TATA won the best employer award fromthe EU.. They don't do unfair business, they just don't by choice. But man the irony of British Salt owned by an Indian firm, nothing beats that. Those who don't follow search Dandi March.
TATA does not do unfair business? They took help from the British Raj back in the 19th century and acquired Asian land unfairly, illegally because of the Asian laws in place locally. Then, they got rich via the Opium History Gate, destroying an entire society by supplying the drug to the British Ra and using the British Raj j to destroy the local Asian population.
@@lkstudio3273 on reports but on ground reality many people who are classified in low income hold crores and Lakhs of rupees property in their villages
@@lkstudio3273 no baba 😂 I'm working since my 11th std. now my salary is 65,000. my brother hot job two years back his salary is 45,000. my dad has salary 80,000. those who r lazy would make excuses.
Biggest joke ever heard 😂😂 when did india existed before 1947 and Dont compare some kingdoms in 17th century as india and most of those people are still poor before British arrived because of low economical growth and high population
Recovering from where? India didn't even exist before British rule. It was dozens of independent states that were frequently at war with each other. This idea that precolonial India was a highly developed, unified nation is a childish fantasy.
Puncture putra spotted↩️ @@mauryanempire7503 If India was poor then why did international travellers came in search of India? 44 Trillion Dollars were looted by Britain alone.
I own a Tata Nexon car, manufactured in India, but the design was done by British and German engineers. I would love the design and performance of the car. "Tata Nexon" is one of the most safest car on earth.
Most British companies r owned by Indians , Royal Enfield, BSA, Leyland ,Morris Oxford later called Ambassador , the 1 st company that started business with India in the 1700 , The East India company is owned by an Indian .
Indians need to purchase British information warfare & narrative building tools like BBC, The Guardian, The Independent, The economist, Bloomberg & Financial times, which actually worth in today's World.
Mr Dilgarden, the Westerners aren't foolish enough to allow Indians to weild their weapons of information warfare against them. The faster way is to destroy those weapons by counter-propaganda. Everybody loves the underdog, just need to market this dynamic in the right way.
bbc is run by government and british people jointly, no body can buy bbc.😊 Guardian is backed by group of big houses and families.😊 Bloomberg is american.😊
@@spandexspleen still families don't want their daughter to marry startup founders, I have been rejected by by more than 100 girls just because I run a Software company not a government employee yet we startup founders pay most of the taxes in this country while government and society suck out our hard earned money
Actually we kinda do hate proud British people who keep on justifying and denying all the wrong doings of colonialism and we have yet to recieve apologies for jalian wala bagh massacre and britian is yet to return stolen things from india
Bold of you to assume UK is a friend Its support for Afghan mujahideen and Pakistan still causes problems With India Also UK has consistently failed to protect its hindu population from Pakistani islamists
India is the largest economy among the British colonies. It has historically been a significant trading partner of the U.K. The large Indian diaspora living in the U.K also makes it a familiar market for Indian companies. Since India’s spending power is increasing, it is actively looking for companies to invest in and bring new technologies to its people. At the same time, the U.K has been facing severe economic crisis, for many years now, makes it quite a cheap market for Indian companies to put their money in.
Historically been a trading partner at gun point to the sole benefit of Britain as decided by the Monarchy. Even after independence, India was barely making progress till 1990 reforms under the legendary PM PV Narasimha Rao after the country went bankrupt.
@AmazingbrownIndians Really, that's why you are mentally sick man. I won't be surprised if you are physically too. Go and see a doctor for your own benefit and stop worrying about others.
@@varun2250PV narshimha Rao ?* Legendary ? I mean yeah they were pm but actually the whole credit is usually being given to Manmohan Singh as the finance minister who single-handedly were responsible for the various reforms in Indian economy . It's actually the PV narshimha Rao's party who were responsible for that situation of India mainly because of their addition of Socialism during emergency in Indian constitution. Even though Manmohan Singh removed a lot of these laws back in 1991 which were there because of the Socialism for example the licensings and all but it's still there in Indian market and slowly being removed as India's growing and stepping towards becoming the golden sparrow again.
Karma at its finest. Mother India👑🚩 is marching again back to her Tiger Throne and indeed she will make her crown the brightest. Thank you Britain for teaching Mother India that her kindness should be reserved only for her children and not for others as other can very well take advantage of it .
@@Goutam_2024 Mr Sunak didn't say that nor the govt. Everyone knows that investment is not charity. Infact, they reject and discourage any investment coming from China. Even though UK 's average annual income (GNI) is $48,890 which is more than twenty+ times than India ($2380) but you think India is capable of doing charity in UK. It is like Pakistan wanted to send aid to UK when there was some disaster in UK. You can only laugh at such suggestion.
@@GK-ui8fv yes the income in India is less than UK but prices in India for any commodity is atleast 20 times cheaper than UK so that evens out and wait a few years and Indian gdp is be triple that of UK. You can't get out of your colonial mindset and the supremacy of your skin so you won't believe it but India is going to surpass Britain in all aspect in the coming years.
Our aim is to recover and gain our full Strength not only economy we want our ancient history back. First :- Our Real name is Bharat. Second :- Akhand Bharat like before our border line starts from iran to tibet and Sri Lanka. Third :- We want ourself Vishwguru( Teacher of world) not Superpower our culture is Vasudhev Kutumbakam means The World is one Family We are Bharat Returning back into our Real Position
@@KKPR533Far Left Librandu and jaahil namajis make fuss of every little thing. Of course this is a foreign channel from Philippines, so what you said is good advice to not nit pick. Although one could argue reducing the amount by $400-500 Billion doesn't exactly fall into nit picking category...
India gdp 2023-$ 3.75 trillion india gdp 2030- $7.10 trillion(projected by imf) India gdp 2036- $10trillion...(AS INDIAS ECONOMY IS BOOMING....WE WILL BECOME 3RD BIGGEST BY 2027 -IMF,MORGANSTANLEY)
Technology transfer is the main thing, like after Tata acquire ranger rover, they got their technology and they are now making cars like Harrier in India which has almost all the technology of Range Rover at 1/10th the price, they will sell those cars in most of Asian countries and make money. And also have to say, Tata's are the business powerhouse for hundreds of years, have bought back JLR into profits again.
They couldn't make it in China and losing money big time.In 2022 Land Rover and Jaguars sold 8K in 24 million cars Chinese market...overall they were lousy cars.
@@jimmylam9846 The actual number is close to 16 thousand and it is a luxury category car, so does not count in the 24 million which include the cheapest cars too and also china market is collapsing, so all the luxury car market is down in china.
@@sahilkahlon1085 All the luxury car market is down not only JLR, since china is going down. And also since market is down after covid people are saving money.
OMG!!!! Forget the money for a second! The damage they did to our heritage, our culture, our well-established and well-balanced lifestyles, stealing our wealth of KNOWLEDGE is beyond description. Money? Here today, gone tomorrow.
You are right, sir, but if British didn't ruled India, I am not so sur if India survived the Muslim invasion, they were already ruling India when British came. Not parting British atall. However it is the rile of nature that positivity andnativity cannot be broken appart.If you accept and understand this rule in different aspect of life, then you can live in harmony and forget the past.
royal Enfield is a old company, and its value get decrease in the past, as they bluid motorcycle only for military and there is no demand other than that and eicher buy company that time, but they make it a success after 2000
It is true that India bought the company but India gave Royal Enfield a new height. Royal Enfield's bullet bikes are designed and manufactured in India.
Once we were slaves under a British East India company, now we are undertaking the power house world economy. Slowly we become the super power that holds the world economy, military, human rights and geo politics system to make ensure safe and peaceful living environment.
True. China growing at 8.1% with an 18 Trillion dollar economy can't be matched by our US$3.3 Trillion economy growing at 8.7%... It needs to be in the range of 15-18% for at least 20-25 years for a proper impact on the ground.
I hope you take back all what Britain stole you and takeover the country with your companies and your people. Britain took Millions of live of Indians who were a group of free nations before British invasion,. Regards from Argentina!! I was in India for an SAP conference. I fell in love with the country.
LAW OF KARMA 🙏 TIME HAS COME FULLY CIRCLE. INDIANS OPPRESSED FOR SO MANY YEARS. TIME TO BECOME THE NEXT SUPERPOWER. LAWS OF NATURE IS FAIR & CONSISTENT. INDIA LOVES UK ALWAYS. VASUDHAIVA KUTUMBAKAM. AKANDA BHARAT ❤JAI HIND 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
India is giving aid to UK.🇮🇳 investment = aid according to English dictionary. British people should use our aid money to help their homeless people 🙏🏻
@@CCrux-yt Keep day dreaming, Brits! ❤ Over half of your population don't have enough money to buy food or even pay their electricity bills. So, you must do some homework and help your poor Brits fellows to get out of extreme poverty instead of arbitrarily commenting here and there. ❤ Love from your most favorite and important colony during stupid and ungrateful BRITISH RAJ! ❤ "The Sun never sets on the Republic of India!"
Never heard of those companies in my entire life. uk isn't even in the list of top 5 investors in India but India is the second largest investor in the uk after uk's big daddy America
@GATEAIR_1 Firstly, I am Indian who studied in the US and now works in India. You haven't heard of the above-mentioned companies because you're dumb. British American Tobacco is the largest share holder of ITC, Hindustan Unilever has the largest largest share in India's FMCG market, and Diageo owns brands like McDowells and Royal Challenger. Rolls Royce makes aircraft engines and has the largest market share in India's civil aviation market. Standard Chartered, HSBC, Prudential have been giving financial services in India for many decades. The UK also has its presence in the form of EY, Grant Thornton and PwC all of which are headquartered in London. Then there is JCB. Please get educated.
Great Britain owes India 43 trillion pounds as a result of colonial loot. Whatever GB invests in India, belongs to India and Pakistan ( 58% & 42%)respectively. In this case The UK must relentlessly invest in India without any expectations of getting any returns.
Great insight. But this covers only large corporations buying small UK firms. If you look at the stock market, with the emergence of so many global investing platforms in India, many Indians are buying UK financial powerhouse stocks like Barclays, HSBC, LLoyd and Natwest in huge quantities using ADR listed on NYSE. I myself hold more than $50K in these stocks and I personally knew dozens other who do the same and I am here talking about 0.00001% of service class investors of India.
@@sheldon1980ableModi made India great. That's the difference. If you are against blind belief, can you openly say that Islam and Christianity are hogwash. You can't because you are a bhakt.
The main reason by far is actually to keep in track of the technological advancements. It is the reason why India lost and was colonised. The tech insight is the driving force. Then there is the established market entry. If you wanna gauge the scope of tech advancement, the Indians gained, one needs to see 2 Indian cars Tata Indica and Tata Altroz, one prior buying JLR and post purchase, the former was blown out of water by Maruti-Suzuki Alto while the latter is making Maruti-Suzuki Baleno sweat profusely. I'm a bit car-nerd, but the argument holds.
BS 😂😂😂 Most of the 18th-19th century India was dominated by the Marathas aka Maratha Empire(1645-1843). Marathas and some other states which had their own military-industrial complex, were in no way technologically weak and inferior to the Europeans. They had lots of Westerners working for them as part of their politico-military bureaucracy and civil administration. The reasons for the British gaining political & economic control of most of the Indian Subcontinent, are complex. Primarily, they were lack of strategic thinking at some crucial points on time, political fracturing, political instability and lack of unity. Marathas lost because of their own internal rivalries, conflicts and civil wars. This is what caused Brits becoming masters of the Subcontinent. But still they didn't managed to rule over all of India and Indian Subcontinent. As states like Nepal remained independent from the British rule.
@@RR-pc7yv Your points conflict to each other. It's true that the Maratha Empire overwhelmingly dominated the Indian landscape, but if one "empire" dominated then how can it be fractured, that means it was more like a confederacy under the Chhatrapati, and not an empire. You said that Marathas hired many Westerners, to improvise the army, exactly my point, they were reliant on Western tech, which is why they hired Western experts and couldn't create an indigenous weapons industry at par with the Europeans. Thirdly, the Mughals were using heavy 500 pounders which if targetted could blow the enemy to smithereens, the Marathas who were superb cavalry hired ex Mughal artillerymen to supplement the lack of it. But the Mughal artillery was heavy and to carry it was a logistical nightmare. Meanwhile the light horse drawn European 20 and 50 pounders could be easily deployed quickly moved and was versatile, which got the Europeans an edge over the Indians.
@@akbrahma7739 Because of the nature of the Maratha polity. As I said, there were divisions, factional rivalries and civil wars among the Marathas. Brits took full advantage of this. As a result, Maratha Empire declined in the early 19th century. But still its politico-military structure lasted until 1843 and Maratha states were Princely States of British India and lasted until their very accession to the Indian Union in 1948-50 (Indore state of the Holkar Marathas). The titles of their rulers formally/officially lasted until the abolishment of the privy purses by PM Indira Gandhi's socialist government in 1972. Informally and socially, the status of Maratha rulers still exists and still remains the same among the masses. Especially for their former subjects and people who still love, revere and respect their monarchs. When Maratha Empire was founded in 1645 by Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, it was an absolute monarchy. During the Mughal War(1680-1707), Marathas Sardars acted as a headless hydra and managed to defeat Aurangzeb's Mughal army despite the latter being the most powerful & wealthy Turkish Isl@m!c polity in the world. The case of absolute monarchy remained the same but after Chhatrapati Shahu Maharaj ji(until 1750s). With the rise of Holkars and Shindes to prominence and Peshwas becoming like what Rana PMSs became in 19th century Shah dynasty-ruled Nepal. But still, the ultimate loyalty remained to the Maratha Emperor and Peshwa. There are numerous occasions on which most of the Maratha Empire's factions have stood as one. Be it the Mughal War(1680-1707), Wars with the Nizam & Brits in the 18th century,etc. So all this is what turned the Maratha polity into a complex entity which many people still fail to understand. The Confederacy phase (although roots of it go back to the time of Peshwa Bajirao I in 1720s-39), only came after the death of Peshwa Madhavrao in 1772. The real trouble began after 1795, when there was a vacuum in the senior politico-military leadership of the Marathas. Then wars took place between the Holkars & Shindes alongside Peshwa. This is at this point, the Brits entered the scene in 1802 and inflicted blows on the Marathas by exploiting their differences and divisions. The Holkars still managed to the inflict some of the most humiliating and disastrous defeats ever suffered by the British in India. But unfortunately, the Marathas still remained divided. Rest is history. Anyways, the point was about the technological inferiority. This is not true. As remember, we are talking about the 18th century not the 20th century. Marathas and other polities like their tributary vassal state aka Sultanate of Mysore(1783-99) and Maharaja Ranjit Singh ji's Sikh Empire(1799-1849), were in no way technologically inferior or weak when it comes to military. In fact, Marathas and Majha Punjabis possessed better arms and artillery than even the sepoy army of the British EIC. British historians and contemporary Western writers have written about the armies of the Marathas. The Maratha troops were in no way inferior to the British troops and were equal if not superior to them. Marathas at that time, had the most powerful and largest military-industrial complex in 18th-early 18th century India. This wasn't the case with other Indian states. This military-industrial complex produced arms, armaments and ammunition which was on par and even better than the Brits and that of the other European powers. General Lake, Arthur Wellesley aka Duke of Wellington,etc. All of them admired and praised the Westernised Maratha Army of Shindeshahi Maratha state. Marathas had the largest number of Europeans and Westerners working for them as part of their politico-military bureaucracy and civil administration. This wasn't the case with any other independent & pre-Brit era entity in India. Even the French thinkers like Robespierre and Napoleon Bonaparte admired Marathas and their prowess. I know all this because I've been studying Maratha history since last 7-8 years from various sources. Mostly online ones. 17th-early 19th century period of history is one of my favourite periods of history. I love the 18th century history. Both European and Indian ones.
@@akbrahma7739 @akbrahma7739 "You said.....Western tech". Yes, because the Europeans were the ones who developed these as one of the best weapons of those times. Marathas, just like the other entities, use to import and bought lots of European weapons since the 17th century. The Qing Chinese, Imperial Japanese, Ottomans and Afsharid/Zand/Qajar Persian states did the same, at that time. What Marathas did and achieved much earlier than any of these above mentioned entities(including the Russian Army of the 18th century). For example:- The Maratha artillery modernized in 1752 with French engineers was better than Russian and Ottomans at the time, at par with Britain and France. Whole world learns and take lessons from each other. Otherwise, the early firearms were developed by the Chinese. It was either the Indians or the Chinese who developed gunpowder which laid the foundation for all such innovations by Europeans. The same Europeans who use lots of stuff today which has its origins and roots in India. Initially, Europeans were hired. But later Indians came in and learned. Marathas began to produce their own 'European weaponry' on their own. Just like the Imperial Japanese and others. So all these facts prove your early and original assertion that Indians were technologically weak aka inferior to Europeans, is wrong and factually incorrect. The research and development + advancement in the field of science comes when there is long term peace and stability in the country and society. When there are centres of learning aka universities and schools. This wasn't the case with the Isl@mic polities of Medieval India. Mughals were no patrons of science and education(except for Madrassas which produce zero scientists & thinkers). The tiny independent Hindu kingdom in Kerala produced more mathematicians than entire Mughal Empire. Mughals even rejected Printing Press like the Ottomans. But this wasn't the case with the Hindus of Portuguese dominions and those of Bombay who embraced and began setting up their own Printing Press in the 17th century itself.
@@akbrahma7739 As I said, Marathas had the most powerful military-industrial complex in 18th century India which manufactured and produced flintlock muskets and European-styled cannons to arm their brigades of troopers trained in Western-style by both Indian and Western military trainers and officers. So they did created a successful indigenous weapons industry which was on par with those of Europe. Even the Ottomans and Afsharid/Zand Iran didn't achieve this feat. "Thirdly......logistical nightmare". I'm not aware of any ex-Mughal artillerymen in Maratha service but I do know that the early Pindaris(a class of rag-tag men-in-arms whose job was to indulge in looting, pillaging, harassing a retreating or routed enemy force and to indulge in scortch earth tactics) who were used extensively by Holkar and Shinde Maratha factions in mid-18th to early 19th century period; were ex-Mughal troopers. I also know that there were a few Turks/M0slims in Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj ji's army and navy who were later kicked out or sacked from their positions. Other than this, I dunno about any ex-Mughal artilleryman hired by Marathas for teaching them operating an artillery gun, something which they already knew from a long time. Actually, there are many misconception regarding the use of firearms and artillery in India and gunpowder warfare in India. Portuguese were the ones who introduced firearms and cannons to India in late-15th century. The armies in Deccan (including those of Maratha warriors in service of both the Deccan Sultanates and Vijayanagara Empire) were the first ones in India, to use cannons and muskets. So Marathas were in no way ignorant and clueless about muskets and other firearms. Many people wrongly believe that it was Babur and Mughals who were the first ones to use gunpowder weapons in India in 1526. Now this is pure ignorance and a myth. True that in comparison with the Mughals, the Marathas stood no chance. Mughals were superior in terms of both the wealth & resources and militarily too. The Mughals had superior firepower and logistics. As you've pointed out that the Mughal artillery was a logistic nightmare. This logistic nightmare + various other factors was among the resaons why Marathas and their superior strategy and tactics prevailed over Mughals in 17th-18th century period which resulted in the end of Mughal rule and the rise of Marathas in India. Even Napoleon was also an admirer of the Maratha cavalry. But again there was nothing special about such 500 Pounder Mughal cannons. As such cannons were used by many in India at that time. For example:- The largest such early 18th century Indian cannon on wheels is Jaivana cannon of Jaipur Rajasthan which was made by Kachhwaha Rajputs of Amber. It's range is at least 10 Kilometers. Marathas neither needed such large size cannons. So they didn't used such guns. But they used lots of artillery guns of various sizes in navy and forts.
Maybe, but was it all one way traffic? I wonder how much Britain has helped India to develop (despite its obvious exploitation). Without the era of imperialism, where would the world be now? Certainly, without the Industrial Revolution, the world would be a different place. If you like what the modern world gives you, with all its advantages, then there is a positive, and should there be a recognition that Britain and others were not simply just exploiters but creators too? Let’s hope the age when all nations are prosperous and at ease with each other arrives eventually!
We are a patner with British east india tea company since 1747 in calcutta ( india) & we indian learn lots from British now we are recovering from the past time
The economy of Bharat is very great thanking to PM Modi ji wise decision of supporting sir Putin and buying his oil! While stupid west refusing to buy Russia oil!! Jai Hind!! Jai shree Putin!!!!!!!!
@@Deandre-j6h if we had someone education we would have 15 trillion but because corrupt Modi we are still 4 for 150 billion people even bangaladesh has more per capita income, Modi is worst thing happened to India. And dollar to rupees is highest ever but tata na ambani doing good things.
In the last 10 yrs the no of people with more than 1000 crore (150million $) increased from 100 (10 cities) to more than 1300 no (94 cities) in 2023. And almost all of them are new gen self made,rose through entrepreneirship....there are guys even the age of 21 yrs(zepto owner)
TATA group is share holder in UK. Infosys owner professor in britain university. Whether british conquered india or industrial revolution. One of the congress minister who laid the bill about delhi to make as consolidation of fund statement collector spoke below statement When british went out from india, india's growth down by 4%. British placed tender to supply within a year but force employees work more than workers are allowed to do. Goods were supplied within a month Products after travelling half a mile in sea, companies cancel the tender Infosys, TCS participation should be brought under aristotle rule
Jaguar, land rover, royal Enfield, all British steel plant , largest British battery manufacturers, Tetley,metro you name it India is the second largest investor in UK Indian companies employee around 200k people Soon UK will be largest vaccine manufacturer in Europe because Indian company SII set the plant
So, you might ask yourself, why invest in Britain? Could it be this is where the skills and infrastructure are? If Britain does become the largest manufacturer of vaccines, it will be because of expertise. In the end, it doesn’t matter which individuals own businesses because the state will benefit anyway through taxes and employment. It is to Britain’s advantage for investment to come from anywhere. To us ordinary citizens, ownership is largely irrelevant.
@@Nopeyes1currently 3.75 Trillion dollar economy it's too easy to 4 Trillion. Our Target 5 trillion dollar economy in 2027 but I think we get in 2026 .
@@arpan9937 We're already in the end of the year. We're most prolly already past the 4 trillion mark by now. We'll just get to know about it when this FY ends
That's because prior to Victorian times, all measures of national and regional productivity were estimated based on population, and India (even in the early 1700s) had a big population. By the 1940s the Industrial Revolution meant that national productivity was determined mainly by the extent to which a nation had embraced technology. India didn't fall from a highly-advanced and highly-productive super-nation into poverty. It merely failed to keep up with the pace of development in nations that were the seat of the Industrial Revolution (ie Britain, Europe and later, the USA) and its a period of around two centuries we're talking about here. A further point worth considering is if India has been this incredibly powerful nation before colonialism, rather than a region of more than 100 princely states with no unified status at all, how would a small island in Northern Europe have been able to take control of it?
@tomjohnson9833 In the past, GDP was calculated using the Index of Industrial Production (IIP) to measure manufacturing and trading activity. The GDP was then estimated using the IIP data and updated using the Annual Survey of Industries (ASI) data and when the Industrial revolution began we were suffering internally bc of the sweet divide and eat policy
@@VXplain. pre-colonial Indian states did not keep the kinds of records that would allow an accurate estimate of IIP. That type of metric didn't exist until the 18th century
@@tomjohnson9833india contributed 25% to world GDP during Mughal period and 33% before that and if don't know india was a major exporter of weapons , textiles , food , spices , boats and ships , pottery , metallurgy and many more things .
Switzerland, Poland, Ireland , Belgium, Netherlands etc are better options...UK, France, Germany, Sweden, Norway etc r unsafe due to their soft stand/ laws against peaceful radical immigrants spreading peace by beheading others.. Another observation is many Europeans, mainly French, dont speak English & then my French friends shared the reason behind it......After working with many nationalities, I can say with conviction that Indians ( with few exceptions) are one of the best people in the world...
bro now BELGIUM , IRELAND are more voilent than western europe what are you reading by peacefulls , only poland is safe but they don't let others to come except europeans
By the way, India was a Developed Nation 500 to 600 years back. India was known for its spices, clothes, silks, metals, nice & cultured people etc. Europeans (Especially British) came as Traders and later ruled the Country. They did both Good & Bad things on India. Freedom is a Universal Right for every Individual and Nation irrespective of its people's race, colour, creed and caste. No Nation is inferior to any Nation. Subjugation to any Nation is a bygone era, its gone and dusted. Forceful subjugation is a crime, which happened 200 to 400 years back. Every Nation has its own potential and God given Natural Resources to become a Developed country depending on its right Institution, proper Governance, justice and rule of law. In olden days, Britain came to India to become more Wealthy country by utilising India's resources and people. Now, India is standing on its own to become again a Developed Nation by respecting International laws and rules and other countries systems. India has not looted any other country to become a Developed Nation. History repeats itself.
Why do you think India is one of the largest foreign investors in the United Kingdom? Let us know down below!
Brother, india's GDP is now 3.7 trillion dolars not 3.3
@@bhupeshyoutuber5578it will be 4 trilion dollars in the end of 2023
@@Amoghavarsha.Nope according to some sources it's 4.1 T not 4T. Means I don't know that much but just giving a Idea.
Though india's stock market just hit 4 tn dollars mark🎉
The economy of Bharat is very great thanking to PM Modi ji wise decision of supporting sir Putin and buying his oil! While stupid west refusing to buy Russia oil!! Jai Hind!! Jai shree Putin!!!!!!!!
UK is now taking AID from india
because by the definition of UK, AID=investment
😂
The economy of Bharat is very great thanking to PM Modi ji wise decision of supporting sir Putin and buying his oil! While stupid west refusing to buy Russia oil!! Jai Hind!! Jai shree Putin!!!!!!!!
always has been since colonialism age lmao.
Underrated 😂❤
😂So true 😆
India is not developing....it is recovering ✊❤️🩹
True ❤
True word❤
Fact
Yes please.. thanks for saying that.. India that is Bharat was never a poor country is not and will not be. They serve frozen food in the British railways, the Indian railways prepares fresh meals that is affordable to passengers traveling the cheapest seat. Indians were kept poor for 3 centuries, India was never poor.
💯💯💯💯💯
West British Company 🗿
lmao
Sun never sets on the Republic of India 🗿
India is just investing in uk
Chārvāka
We Just want our 44t $ back
India and UK will be together forever. UK ruled India for approximately 200 years and now India is gonna to rule UK back. What a lovely relationship it is
Thats sooo gæ
@@swastik-12so is you sucker 😂😂😂
Ruling and Working is a different story. Both times you are working for the british. Once a slave always a slave.
@@kromann413 see America once it was a British colony... Do you think America is a slave of UK 😂
@@Deshbhakt199 He won't answer 😂😂😂😂
1765 - east india company 🇮🇳
2023 - west england company 🇬🇧
Bhaii.... 🔥🔥🔥
Jai Hind!
Don't compare that cruel company to our Tata group
Come on mate, Indian elites allied themselves with the EIC and 80% of its soldiers were Indian
Best wishes to India from the UK 🙏
Yes, then England will a Slump like India. Concentrate on your Domestic Policy, before you fantasize about that. Cows still roam on your streets, sh"""ing everywhere heck even People are sh"""ing everywhere. Your Country is dirty and backwatered,whilst England is dominating with a naturally Industralized Economy.
Britain is not harmed by these investments. They are harmed by 1. Growing Muslim population 2. Extreme Socialism which has made bulk of the population lazy and take benefits without contributing.
The economy of Bharat is very great thanking to PM Modi ji wise decision of supporting sir Putin and buying his oil! While stupid west refusing to buy Russia oil!! Jai Hind!! Jai shree Putin!!!!!!!!
Radical Islam will single Handedly bring down UK and Europe.
@@Deandre-j6hChapri napaki bot
@@Deandre-j6h☪️hutlim paxtani💩🇵🇰
They are not stupid, They are selfish. War is their business. They just want everyone else to suffer.@@Deandre-j6h
India sent #Aid worth $25 Billion to Britain in year 2022.
According to Britain: #Aid = Investment.
India has received 33.4 billion in aid tho
@@CCrux-ytperhaps you should get your facts right before feeling all that excited.... in 2011 Indian Govt categorically said we don't want your aid.... official statement - "Pranab Mukherjee and other Indian ministers tried to terminate Britain’s aid to their booming country last year - but relented after the British begged them to keep taking the money", The Sunday Telegraph can reveal.
“It is a peanut in our total development exercises [expenditure].” He said the Indian government wanted to “voluntarily” give it up.
India was looted high and dry by your moronic colonial ancestors ... the reparations due in todays exchange would be around $43trillion....
Your aid money which we had rejected several times is an affront to our past wounds .... so if Britain has an iota of shame .. they should apologise to the country for what they done....
It's a ground fact that UKs economy only developed during its colonial rule, after Britain left India, its economic development slowed and today it is reaching stagnation.
@@CW-bw7pv that's slow compared to the growth British empire had with its colonies
Source- trust me bro
That's why India was the crown of thw empire and Britain was the anus of the empire
@@yungman7053ni hao ling-l1ng. what is your social credit score?
@@yungman7053source- literally every fucking economic outlet
British salt is now owned by TATA an Indian company which has its 66% shares owned by a non profit foundation. Nothing can match this.. Jamshedji TATA thank you.. btw TATA won the best employer award fromthe EU.. They don't do unfair business, they just don't by choice.
But man the irony of British Salt owned by an Indian firm, nothing beats that. Those who don't follow search Dandi March.
Happy New Year mate :-)
@@sheldon1980ablehappy fish 🥧
The Tata family are of European and Middle East origin.
TATA does not do unfair business? They took help from the British Raj back in the 19th century and acquired Asian land unfairly, illegally because of the Asian laws in place locally. Then, they got rich via the Opium History Gate, destroying an entire society by supplying the drug to the British Ra and using the British Raj j to destroy the local Asian population.
by purchasing power parity, India's GDP is 13.7 trillion $ , 3rd largest in world, with cost of living 20x less then any western nations.
😎
@@lkstudio3273 u must be poor amongst 10-14% of India's poverty. in UK its 18-20% .
@@lkstudio3273 on reports
but on ground reality many people who are classified in low income hold crores and Lakhs of rupees property in their villages
@@lkstudio3273 bruh where you getting the infos ?? Care to send the details or links ??
@@lkstudio3273 no baba 😂 I'm working since my 11th std. now my salary is 65,000. my brother hot job two years back his salary is 45,000. my dad has salary 80,000.
those who r lazy would make excuses.
TATA is making a Giga Factory in UK by investing $5.0 Billion
giving aid lol
That's an AID to UK from India
Tata aid de Raha hai bhai.
@@vedantvhumbbegiving 45 Trillian dollar western 🐽
Bless India and Indians in the UK.
INDIA is a RECOVERING nation not a developing nation
💯💯
Biggest joke ever heard 😂😂 when did india existed before 1947 and Dont compare some kingdoms in 17th century as india and most of those people are still poor before British arrived because of low economical growth and high population
Recovering from where?
India didn't even exist before British rule. It was dozens of independent states that were frequently at war with each other.
This idea that precolonial India was a highly developed, unified nation is a childish fantasy.
Puncture putra spotted↩️
@@mauryanempire7503
If India was poor then why did international travellers came in search of India?
44 Trillion Dollars were looted by Britain alone.
India existed as a single political entity for 800 years under Mughlas and 200 years under Mauryas and 100 years under Guptas@@tomjohnson9833
“India and Britain have distinct histories”
Yes, if you completely ignore some 300 years🥰
British read fables for history in which they are all white knights with a saviour's heart bearing the white man's burden.
@@tikatank6772No we dont...
@@Rhileyn those 300 year is the reason for today.condition
it's time for Britain to become 3rd world and it will become very soon
Me anticipating an upcoming partition of Londonistan and Britannia along religious lines. 😅
Christian and muslims will make hindus converted from hinduism for sure.
😂
In your fantasy hindu dreams maybe. All it takes is a political shift and most of your brown brothers will be thrown out of the UK and europe
Can’t wait for europistan too
Whole europe will be stan😅
I own a Tata Nexon car, manufactured in India, but the design was done by British and German engineers. I would love the design and performance of the car. "Tata Nexon" is one of the most safest car on earth.
Your country?
@@sakshisharma8170 Indian dear. I was talking about my experience driving Nexon in India.
@@learningmaster8060getout from india , if we help western countries they respect us no, then why u r praising them
@@asura2000chill out man.
@@asura2000do not boast as if Indians designed Nexon. Most of the countries cars were made from German and Japanese tech
Most British companies r owned by Indians , Royal Enfield, BSA, Leyland ,Morris Oxford later called Ambassador , the 1 st company that started business with India in the 1700 , The East India company is owned by an Indian .
🤣🤣 no ftse100 company is owned by india
crying?@@H1labs
Many Indian company's also owned by UK too
lmao....Indian Raj on Uk begins...😂😂
@@H1labsexcatly, these Indians really think they are special 😂
Its a business relationship. There are over 600 British companies in India employing over half a million Indians. This is good news for both parties.
Firstly world should understand the fact that india is not developing, india is recovering it's glory
Recovering word should be used for India
Shitistan
Tatistan
Indians need to purchase British information warfare & narrative building tools like BBC, The Guardian, The Independent, The economist, Bloomberg & Financial times, which actually worth in today's World.
Bloomberg is American. Economist is owned by the LORD MASTER of West
Mr Dilgarden, the Westerners aren't foolish enough to allow Indians to weild their weapons of information warfare against them. The faster way is to destroy those weapons by counter-propaganda. Everybody loves the underdog, just need to market this dynamic in the right way.
The Economist too
They are worthless in coming years
bbc is run by government and british people jointly, no body can buy bbc.😊
Guardian is backed by group of big houses and families.😊
Bloomberg is american.😊
*INDIA WILL REACH 4.1 TRILLION VERY SOON* ✌😎🇮🇳
Most probably in March 2024
It’s 3.75 Trillion now
said *soon*@@IWasInBerlinDuringWW2
Though india's stock market just hit 4 tn mark🎉
Of wast throwed to the sea
Only few educated people could value the efforts done by India's Private sector.
Yes but our generation should look forward to taking this further 🎉
@@spandexspleen still families don't want their daughter to marry startup founders, I have been rejected by by more than 100 girls just because I run a Software company not a government employee yet we startup founders pay most of the taxes in this country while government and society suck out our hard earned money
@@BondJFK respect that you are an entrepreneur bro ❤❤
God bless India God own country is reviving 🌸
Cope
@@KEVINTHOMAStheBOSSman💩
@@KEVINTHOMAStheBOSSman butt wiper got shocked
I love how India holds no grudges and befriends uk instead of taking revenge. The best way to defeat an enemy is to make them your friend
But not all Indians like me I ha t e them from my heart and want a separation of that island
Actually we kinda do hate proud British people who keep on justifying and denying all the wrong doings of colonialism and we have yet to recieve apologies for jalian wala bagh massacre and britian is yet to return stolen things from india
Bold of you to assume UK is a friend
Its support for Afghan mujahideen and Pakistan still causes problems With India
Also UK has consistently failed to protect its hindu population from Pakistani islamists
Or make them your employee.
@ but befriending them is easier
Historically, India sent aid worth £45,000,000,000,000 to UK to be exact.
India is the largest economy among the British colonies. It has historically been a significant trading partner of the U.K. The large Indian diaspora living in the U.K also makes it a familiar market for Indian companies.
Since India’s spending power is increasing, it is actively looking for companies to invest in and bring new technologies to its people. At the same time, the U.K has been facing severe economic crisis, for many years now, makes it quite a cheap market for Indian companies to put their money in.
Historically been a trading partner at gun point to the sole benefit of Britain as decided by the Monarchy.
Even after independence, India was barely making progress till 1990 reforms under the legendary PM PV Narasimha Rao after the country went bankrupt.
UK historical trading partner of India. - Nice Joke!!
UK has never been a partner historically. Don't give it credit for what it's not.
@AmazingbrownIndians Really, that's why you are mentally sick man. I won't be surprised if you are physically too.
Go and see a doctor for your own benefit and stop worrying about others.
c@AmazingbrownIndians 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
@@varun2250PV narshimha Rao ?*
Legendary ?
I mean yeah they were pm but actually the whole credit is usually being given to Manmohan Singh as the finance minister who single-handedly were responsible for the various reforms in Indian economy .
It's actually the PV narshimha Rao's party who were responsible for that situation of India mainly because of their addition of Socialism during emergency in Indian constitution. Even though Manmohan Singh removed a lot of these laws back in 1991 which were there because of the Socialism for example the licensings and all but it's still there in Indian market and slowly being removed as India's growing and stepping towards becoming the golden sparrow again.
Karma at its finest.
Mother India👑🚩 is marching again back to her Tiger Throne and indeed she will make her crown the brightest. Thank you Britain for teaching Mother India that her kindness should be reserved only for her children and not for others as other can very well take advantage of it .
Ain't that poetic!
A mother has a son doesnt she? Who is the son?
Others will not even be worth remembering…
@@BESTGAMER12132all the people of India
India is giving aid to UK, WOW !😂
How do you interpret this way? Allowed to buy or do a business is not a charitable act.
@@GK-ui8fvAccording to British, #Investment=AID
@@Goutam_2024 Mr Sunak didn't say that nor the govt. Everyone knows that investment is not charity. Infact, they reject and discourage any investment coming from China. Even though UK 's average annual income (GNI) is $48,890 which is more than twenty+ times than India ($2380) but you think India is capable of doing charity in UK.
It is like Pakistan wanted to send aid to UK when there was some disaster in UK. You can only laugh at such suggestion.
@@GK-ui8fv lol ur not doing charity here ur investing and doing missionary works
@@GK-ui8fv yes the income in India is less than UK but prices in India for any commodity is atleast 20 times cheaper than UK so that evens out and wait a few years and Indian gdp is be triple that of UK. You can't get out of your colonial mindset and the supremacy of your skin so you won't believe it but India is going to surpass Britain in all aspect in the coming years.
Well done INDIA 🇮🇳,,, glad to see you prosper (“they shall prosper that love thee”)
Our aim is to recover and gain our full Strength not only economy we want our ancient history back.
First :- Our Real name is Bharat.
Second :- Akhand Bharat like before our border line starts from iran to tibet and Sri Lanka.
Third :- We want ourself Vishwguru( Teacher of world) not Superpower our culture is Vasudhev Kutumbakam means The World is one Family
We are Bharat Returning back into our Real Position
Time turns!
From ancient world power to medieval colony to #VishwaGuru power!
what is this vishwaguru?, I mean most gobars eat ghutka and panmasala and spit it one public places an transport, is that what you mean by vishwaguru?
@@evilandrew1097" *most* " really?
Sir please correct your figures, India's GDP is now 3.7 trillion dollars and not 3.3 trillion.
Arey bhai itna nit picking kahe, bacche ho kya?
@@KKPR533 samne wale ho correct krne se bache ho gye? Aur tujhe toh pata bhi nahi hoga ki India ki GDP ab 3.7 trillion ho chuki hai gawaar
@@KKPR533Far Left Librandu and jaahil namajis make fuss of every little thing.
Of course this is a foreign channel from Philippines, so what you said is good advice to not nit pick. Although one could argue reducing the amount by $400-500 Billion doesn't exactly fall into nit picking category...
Crossed 4 trillion.
@@varun2250 abe ye desi channel hai. AI english accent se view kama raha hai. Kuch Indians chutiye k chutiye he rahenge.
India gdp 2023-$ 3.75 trillion
india gdp 2030- $7.10 trillion(projected by imf)
India gdp 2036- $10trillion...(AS INDIAS ECONOMY IS BOOMING....WE WILL BECOME 3RD BIGGEST BY 2027 -IMF,MORGANSTANLEY)
Stupidity GDP don’t mean sh** only your government is rich not your people most of them still live in poverty
Do you even have toilets?
@@johnpap6533 maybe you have money give to build toilet
@@johnpap6533and you have mobile phone also. Poor UK 😂
India 🇮🇳>>>>>>>>>>> 🇬🇧 🤏
@@johnpap6533more than the no of people in uk..lol
Technology transfer is the main thing, like after Tata acquire ranger rover, they got their technology and they are now making cars like Harrier in India which has almost all the technology of Range Rover at 1/10th the price, they will sell those cars in most of Asian countries and make money. And also have to say, Tata's are the business powerhouse for hundreds of years, have bought back JLR into profits again.
They couldn't make it in China and losing money big time.In 2022 Land Rover and Jaguars sold 8K in 24 million cars Chinese market...overall they were lousy cars.
@@jimmylam9846 The actual number is close to 16 thousand and it is a luxury category car, so does not count in the 24 million which include the cheapest cars too and also china market is collapsing, so all the luxury car market is down in china.
@@heavenlyxtacywhy it is colalapsing
@@sahilkahlon1085 All the luxury car market is down not only JLR, since china is going down. And also since market is down after covid people are saving money.
OMG!!!! Forget the money for a second! The damage they did to our heritage, our culture, our well-established and well-balanced lifestyles, stealing our wealth of KNOWLEDGE is beyond description. Money? Here today, gone tomorrow.
they committed genocide in India
The same is being done by BJP to India
@@thinker1491 not INDIA alliance will do it if come to power
You are right, sir, but if British didn't ruled India, I am not so sur if India survived the Muslim invasion, they were already ruling India when British came.
Not parting British atall.
However it is the rile of nature that positivity andnativity cannot be broken appart.If you accept and understand this rule in different aspect of life, then you can live in harmony and forget the past.
@@thinker1491are you an idiot ?
BJP is restoring India's long lost culture and heritage.
bas internet pai aakar bakwas karna hai
Thank God the Indians are teaching the principle of paying for goods.
Keep teaching!🙏🏾
Gdp nominal is 4trillion dollar and ppp gdp is 10 trillion (3rd largest)
PPP is more than 12 trillion dollars correct your data kid
@@otakuROHITit is 13 trilion dollars now .
@@otakuROHIT Don't use the word kid unnecessarily and as an abuse. It makes you look ignorant.
@@varun2250Yup right
India's GDP PPP is about 14 trillion USD now.
Didn't know India pulled out the uno reverse card on Britain
You forget most important company that brought by indian company is royal Enfield which is acquired by eicher motors.
royal Enfield is a old company, and its value get decrease in the past, as they bluid motorcycle only for military and there is no demand other than that and eicher buy company that time, but they make it a success after 2000
Royal Enfield was indian. Thier highest sales were always in India, plus the fact that their headquarters are also now here, I think.
It is true that India bought the company but India gave Royal Enfield a new height. Royal Enfield's bullet bikes are designed and manufactured in India.
Royal Enfield didn't get the popularity it deserved until it was revived in India
Britain and India are natural partners complementing each other’s strengths. Move from the past towards a new future
In history they rule us.....now they run by us .....power of India ❤
@@Deandre-j6hDefinitely
MODI ji
😂😂😂
@@aek12 😮💨 Classic Nut-Sack
Not really
Delusional Indian Nationalists
Fun fact:- East India Company is now owned by an Indian.
Once we were slaves under a British East India company, now we are undertaking the power house world economy. Slowly we become the super power that holds the world economy, military, human rights and geo politics system to make ensure safe and peaceful living environment.
Slaves eh..its bcs you guys willing now slaves to z'ionist.
Huh!! 😂😂, Try to make your nation better.
Get toilets first and stop drinking water with shit
@@Mathematician6124do it yourself!!
India gdp (as per IMF data) in :-
2007 was 1 trillion $
2014 was 2 trillion $
2019 was 3 trillion $
2024 will be 4.1 $
Make it 2022 3 trillion
@@swarnavaghosh908 check out 2019 figure.
2019 - 3 trillion $
2020 - 2.7 trillion $ (COVID impact)
2021 - 2.9 trillion $
2022 - 3.3 trillion $
2023 - 3.7 trillion $
2024 - 4.1 trillion $
Infosys son in law is UK's PM😂
Oh my. We as Indians are pretty spread world wide. Ö.
Not any more....😮😮😮
Indias greatest export, is its people.
@@oomz1975it was its wealth to British
@@oomz1975 talent, u mean
Britain is also investing heavily in India I believe the UK is currently the 4thy largest foreign investor in India.
Yes we are growing, but we need to double our growth to be significant contributor in the world.
We need to work much harder and smarter...go india go
True. China growing at 8.1% with an 18 Trillion dollar economy can't be matched by our US$3.3 Trillion economy growing at 8.7%... It needs to be in the range of 15-18% for at least 20-25 years for a proper impact on the ground.
Sun never sets on the republic of India/ Bharat
cope
This is just the beginning, the movie is yet to come
I hope you take back all what Britain stole you and takeover the country with your companies and your people. Britain took Millions of live of Indians who were a group of free nations before British invasion,. Regards from Argentina!! I was in India for an SAP conference. I fell in love with the country.
Uno reverse
Ohh great to hear
At least India is Buying not taking and showcasing in our museum.
LAW OF KARMA 🙏 TIME HAS COME FULLY CIRCLE. INDIANS OPPRESSED FOR SO MANY YEARS. TIME TO BECOME THE NEXT SUPERPOWER. LAWS OF NATURE IS FAIR & CONSISTENT. INDIA LOVES UK ALWAYS. VASUDHAIVA KUTUMBAKAM. AKANDA BHARAT ❤JAI HIND 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
As a Brit, how good it is to see the star of India rise. I wish your nation well and that it is happy.
India is giving aid to UK.🇮🇳 investment = aid according to English dictionary.
British people should use our aid money to help their homeless people 🙏🏻
Maybe it should help the 80 million Indians in Poverty
@@CCrux-yt are this report from your stepmom or wot stud assy 😂 I see your burning ass just commenting against India 🥵
@@CCrux-ytwe are rich by ❤ not like you guys who have the blood behind all your amazing developed metro cities.
@@CCrux-yt Keep day dreaming, Brits! ❤ Over half of your population don't have enough money to buy food or even pay their electricity bills.
So, you must do some homework and help your poor Brits fellows to get out of extreme poverty instead of arbitrarily commenting here and there. ❤
Love from your most favorite and important colony during stupid and ungrateful BRITISH RAJ! ❤
"The Sun never sets on the Republic of India!"
@@CCrux-yti think its time you guys realise that there are other countries as well other than west 😂
We are getting our 45 trillion one way or another!!! 😂💪🏽🇮🇳
My Goal = To make India happy and stronger than before. 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳☦️ Jai Hind. வந்தே மாதரம்.
Gay hind
@@fireandice-p6h North GAYrea.
@@KriseshVinay gay hind saar ... poopdia
Then: 🇬🇧: 🇮🇳 is mine !
Now: 🇮🇳:Now 🇬🇧is mine..
UK also has presence in India. Unilever, Rickett Beckenser, Standard Chartered, Vodafone, Cairn Energy, BP, Ineos, Diageo, Prudential, Aviva etc.
Bro u forgot JCB 🗿
On a smaller note...Indian startup Udaan raised Rs. 2822 crores or $340 million funding from British investment manager M&G.
thats their own companies. here the video is about Indians buying UK companies
Never heard of those companies in my entire life. uk isn't even in the list of top 5 investors in India but India is the second largest investor in the uk after uk's big daddy America
@GATEAIR_1 Firstly, I am Indian who studied in the US and now works in India. You haven't heard of the above-mentioned companies because you're dumb.
British American Tobacco is the largest share holder of ITC, Hindustan Unilever has the largest largest share in India's FMCG market, and Diageo owns brands like McDowells and Royal Challenger. Rolls Royce makes aircraft engines and has the largest market share in India's civil aviation market. Standard Chartered, HSBC, Prudential have been giving financial services in India for many decades. The UK also has its presence in the form of EY, Grant Thornton and PwC all of which are headquartered in London. Then there is JCB. Please get educated.
India is Recovering!
UK will be needing their own English version of gandhi soon
Are you interested in learning how to earn lakhs of rupees daily with your smart phone ?
The सूर्य never sets on the Democratic Republic of भारत 🗿👑🚩
Great Britain owes India 43 trillion pounds as a result of colonial loot. Whatever GB invests in India, belongs to India and Pakistan ( 58% & 42%)respectively. In this case The UK must relentlessly invest in India without any expectations of getting any returns.
Great insight. But this covers only large corporations buying small UK firms. If you look at the stock market, with the emergence of so many global investing platforms in India, many Indians are buying UK financial powerhouse stocks like Barclays, HSBC, LLoyd and Natwest in huge quantities using ADR listed on NYSE. I myself hold more than $50K in these stocks and I personally knew dozens other who do the same and I am here talking about 0.00001% of service class investors of India.
British people need to come out from their imperialism mentality and accept Rishi as their PM for next 20 years 🇮🇳
There are no Rishibhakts here in the UK unlike the Modibhakts in India
Rishi will be gone for soon!
@@koushikdas1992no doubt in that
@@sheldon1980ableModi made India great. That's the difference. If you are against blind belief, can you openly say that Islam and Christianity are hogwash. You can't because you are a bhakt.
@@phoenixj1299 Modi made India great? You’re definitely a Andhbhakt. 😀
The jewel in the Holy Indian Empire’s crown. 👑🇮🇳😋
India must grow stronger like china and dominate britain
The main reason by far is actually to keep in track of the technological advancements. It is the reason why India lost and was colonised. The tech insight is the driving force. Then there is the established market entry. If you wanna gauge the scope of tech advancement, the Indians gained, one needs to see 2 Indian cars Tata Indica and Tata Altroz, one prior buying JLR and post purchase, the former was blown out of water by Maruti-Suzuki Alto while the latter is making Maruti-Suzuki Baleno sweat profusely. I'm a bit car-nerd, but the argument holds.
BS 😂😂😂
Most of the 18th-19th century India was dominated by the Marathas aka Maratha Empire(1645-1843). Marathas and some other states which had their own military-industrial complex, were in no way technologically weak and inferior to the Europeans. They had lots of Westerners working for them as part of their politico-military bureaucracy and civil administration.
The reasons for the British gaining political & economic control of most of the Indian Subcontinent, are complex. Primarily, they were lack of strategic thinking at some crucial points on time, political fracturing, political instability and lack of unity. Marathas lost because of their own internal rivalries, conflicts and civil wars. This is what caused Brits becoming masters of the Subcontinent.
But still they didn't managed to rule over all of India and Indian Subcontinent. As states like Nepal remained independent from the British rule.
@@RR-pc7yv Your points conflict to each other. It's true that the Maratha Empire overwhelmingly dominated the Indian landscape, but if one "empire" dominated then how can it be fractured, that means it was more like a confederacy under the Chhatrapati, and not an empire. You said that Marathas hired many Westerners, to improvise the army, exactly my point, they were reliant on Western tech, which is why they hired Western experts and couldn't create an indigenous weapons industry at par with the Europeans. Thirdly, the Mughals were using heavy 500 pounders which if targetted could blow the enemy to smithereens, the Marathas who were superb cavalry hired ex Mughal artillerymen to supplement the lack of it. But the Mughal artillery was heavy and to carry it was a logistical nightmare. Meanwhile the light horse drawn European 20 and 50 pounders could be easily deployed quickly moved and was versatile, which got the Europeans an edge over the Indians.
@@akbrahma7739 Because of the nature of the Maratha polity. As I said, there were divisions, factional rivalries and civil wars among the Marathas. Brits took full advantage of this. As a result, Maratha Empire declined in the early 19th century. But still its politico-military structure lasted until 1843 and Maratha states were Princely States of British India and lasted until their very accession to the Indian Union in 1948-50 (Indore state of the Holkar Marathas). The titles of their rulers formally/officially lasted until the abolishment of the privy purses by PM Indira Gandhi's socialist government in 1972. Informally and socially, the status of Maratha rulers still exists and still remains the same among the masses. Especially for their former subjects and people who still love, revere and respect their monarchs.
When Maratha Empire was founded in 1645 by Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, it was an absolute monarchy. During the Mughal War(1680-1707), Marathas Sardars acted as a headless hydra and managed to defeat Aurangzeb's Mughal army despite the latter being the most powerful & wealthy Turkish Isl@m!c polity in the world.
The case of absolute monarchy remained the same but after Chhatrapati Shahu Maharaj ji(until 1750s). With the rise of Holkars and Shindes to prominence and Peshwas becoming like what Rana PMSs became in 19th century Shah dynasty-ruled Nepal. But still, the ultimate loyalty remained to the Maratha Emperor and Peshwa. There are numerous occasions on which most of the Maratha Empire's factions have stood as one. Be it the Mughal War(1680-1707), Wars with the Nizam & Brits in the 18th century,etc. So all this is what turned the Maratha polity into a complex entity which many people still fail to understand. The Confederacy phase (although roots of it go back to the time of Peshwa Bajirao I in 1720s-39), only came after the death of Peshwa Madhavrao in 1772. The real trouble began after 1795, when there was a vacuum in the senior politico-military leadership of the Marathas. Then wars took place between the Holkars & Shindes alongside Peshwa. This is at this point, the Brits entered the scene in 1802 and inflicted blows on the Marathas by exploiting their differences and divisions. The Holkars still managed to the inflict some of the most humiliating and disastrous defeats ever suffered by the British in India. But unfortunately, the Marathas still remained divided. Rest is history.
Anyways, the point was about the technological inferiority. This is not true. As remember, we are talking about the 18th century not the 20th century. Marathas and other polities like their tributary vassal state aka Sultanate of Mysore(1783-99) and Maharaja Ranjit Singh ji's Sikh Empire(1799-1849), were in no way technologically inferior or weak when it comes to military. In fact, Marathas and Majha Punjabis possessed better arms and artillery than even the sepoy army of the British EIC. British historians and contemporary Western writers have written about the armies of the Marathas. The Maratha troops were in no way inferior to the British troops and were equal if not superior to them. Marathas at that time, had the most powerful and largest military-industrial complex in 18th-early 18th century India. This wasn't the case with other Indian states. This military-industrial complex produced arms, armaments and ammunition which was on par and even better than the Brits and that of the other European powers. General Lake, Arthur Wellesley aka Duke of Wellington,etc. All of them admired and praised the Westernised Maratha Army of Shindeshahi Maratha state. Marathas had the largest number of Europeans and Westerners working for them as part of their politico-military bureaucracy and civil administration. This wasn't the case with any other independent & pre-Brit era entity in India. Even the French thinkers like Robespierre and Napoleon Bonaparte admired Marathas and their prowess. I know all this because I've been studying Maratha history since last 7-8 years from various sources. Mostly online ones. 17th-early 19th century period of history is one of my favourite periods of history. I love the 18th century history. Both European and Indian ones.
@@akbrahma7739 @akbrahma7739
"You said.....Western tech".
Yes, because the Europeans were the ones who developed these as one of the best weapons of those times. Marathas, just like the other entities, use to import and bought lots of European weapons since the 17th century. The Qing Chinese, Imperial Japanese, Ottomans and Afsharid/Zand/Qajar Persian states did the same, at that time. What Marathas did and achieved much earlier than any of these above mentioned entities(including the Russian Army of the 18th century). For example:- The Maratha artillery modernized in 1752 with French engineers was better than Russian and Ottomans at the time, at par with Britain and France.
Whole world learns and take lessons from each other. Otherwise, the early firearms were developed by the Chinese. It was either the Indians or the Chinese who developed gunpowder which laid the foundation for all such innovations by Europeans. The same Europeans who use lots of stuff today which has its origins and roots in India.
Initially, Europeans were hired. But later Indians came in and learned. Marathas began to produce their own 'European weaponry' on their own. Just like the Imperial Japanese and others. So all these facts prove your early and original assertion that Indians were technologically weak aka inferior to Europeans, is wrong and factually incorrect. The research and development + advancement in the field of science comes when there is long term peace and stability in the country and society. When there are centres of learning aka universities and schools. This wasn't the case with the Isl@mic polities of Medieval India. Mughals were no patrons of science and education(except for Madrassas which produce zero scientists & thinkers). The tiny independent Hindu kingdom in Kerala produced more mathematicians than entire Mughal Empire. Mughals even rejected Printing Press like the Ottomans. But this wasn't the case with the Hindus of Portuguese dominions and those of Bombay who embraced and began setting up their own Printing Press in the 17th century itself.
@@akbrahma7739 As I said, Marathas had the most powerful military-industrial complex in 18th century India which manufactured and produced flintlock muskets and European-styled cannons to arm their brigades of troopers trained in Western-style by both Indian and Western military trainers and officers. So they did created a successful indigenous weapons industry which was on par with those of Europe. Even the Ottomans and Afsharid/Zand Iran didn't achieve this feat.
"Thirdly......logistical nightmare".
I'm not aware of any ex-Mughal artillerymen in Maratha service but I do know that the early Pindaris(a class of rag-tag men-in-arms whose job was to indulge in looting, pillaging, harassing a retreating or routed enemy force and to indulge in scortch earth tactics) who were used extensively by Holkar and Shinde Maratha factions in mid-18th to early 19th century period; were ex-Mughal troopers. I also know that there were a few Turks/M0slims in Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj ji's army and navy who were later kicked out or sacked from their positions. Other than this, I dunno about any ex-Mughal artilleryman hired by Marathas for teaching them operating an artillery gun, something which they already knew from a long time.
Actually, there are many misconception regarding the use of firearms and artillery in India and gunpowder warfare in India. Portuguese were the ones who introduced firearms and cannons to India in late-15th century. The armies in Deccan (including those of Maratha warriors in service of both the Deccan Sultanates and Vijayanagara Empire) were the first ones in India, to use cannons and muskets. So Marathas were in no way ignorant and clueless about muskets and other firearms.
Many people wrongly believe that it was Babur and Mughals who were the first ones to use gunpowder weapons in India in 1526. Now this is pure ignorance and a myth.
True that in comparison with the Mughals, the Marathas stood no chance. Mughals were superior in terms of both the wealth & resources and militarily too. The Mughals had superior firepower and logistics. As you've pointed out that the Mughal artillery was a logistic nightmare. This logistic nightmare + various other factors was among the resaons why Marathas and their superior strategy and tactics prevailed over Mughals in 17th-18th century period which resulted in the end of Mughal rule and the rise of Marathas in India. Even Napoleon was also an admirer of the Maratha cavalry.
But again there was nothing special about such 500 Pounder Mughal cannons. As such cannons were used by many in India at that time. For example:- The largest such early 18th century Indian cannon on wheels is Jaivana cannon of Jaipur Rajasthan which was made by Kachhwaha Rajputs of Amber. It's range is at least 10 Kilometers. Marathas neither needed such large size cannons. So they didn't used such guns. But they used lots of artillery guns of various sizes in navy and forts.
India is not developing but getting its place as Richest Country of World again
$45 Trillion was taken from India by Britain over 200 years of rule
Maybe, but was it all one way traffic? I wonder how much Britain has helped India to develop (despite its obvious exploitation). Without the era of imperialism, where would the world be now? Certainly, without the Industrial Revolution, the world would be a different place.
If you like what the modern world gives you, with all its advantages, then there is a positive, and should there be a recognition that Britain and others were not simply just exploiters but creators too?
Let’s hope the age when all nations are prosperous and at ease with each other arrives eventually!
And squandered away in less than 100 years!😂
It's buying & not looting. And India is fully capable of creating MNC's of their own.
Slowly but surely we're reaching closer to that damn diamond.
I had no idea Tetley was originally British. Great green tea btw
We indian we rule the world again and again by economically
Oh my, how the Tables have turned.
We are a patner with British east india tea company since 1747 in calcutta ( india) & we indian learn lots from British now we are recovering from the past time
We are here just to sell our spices 💀
Now this is what East India company means
Now india is become 4 trilloon doller economy 🇮🇳
The economy of Bharat is very great thanking to PM Modi ji wise decision of supporting sir Putin and buying his oil! While stupid west refusing to buy Russia oil!! Jai Hind!! Jai shree Putin!!!!!!!!
@@Deandre-j6h if we had someone education we would have 15 trillion but because corrupt Modi we are still 4 for 150 billion people even bangaladesh has more per capita income, Modi is worst thing happened to India. And dollar to rupees is highest ever but tata na ambani doing good things.
BJP IS FOR HINDUS AND THOSE WHO ARE AGAINST BJP ARE ANTI- HINDU OR LEFTISTS. I KNOW WHO YOU ARE*@@sarangshinde5490
In the last 10 yrs the no of people with more than 1000 crore (150million $) increased from 100 (10 cities) to more than 1300 no (94 cities) in 2023.
And almost all of them are new gen self made,rose through entrepreneirship....there are guys even the age of 21 yrs(zepto owner)
TATA group is share holder in UK. Infosys owner professor in britain university.
Whether british conquered india or industrial revolution.
One of the congress minister who laid the bill about delhi to make as consolidation of fund statement collector spoke below statement
When british went out from india, india's growth down by 4%.
British placed tender to supply within a year but force employees work more than workers are allowed to do. Goods were supplied within a month
Products after travelling half a mile in sea, companies cancel the tender
Infosys, TCS participation should be brought under aristotle rule
0:50 3.3 trillion??????? Its goddamn 3.89 trillion dollar economy
Jaguar, land rover, royal Enfield, all British steel plant , largest British battery manufacturers, Tetley,metro you name it
India is the second largest investor in UK
Indian companies employee around 200k people
Soon UK will be largest vaccine manufacturer in Europe because Indian company SII set the plant
So, you might ask yourself, why invest in Britain? Could it be this is where the skills and infrastructure are? If Britain does become the largest manufacturer of vaccines, it will be because of expertise. In the end, it doesn’t matter which individuals own businesses because the state will benefit anyway through taxes and employment. It is to Britain’s advantage for investment to come from anywhere. To us ordinary citizens, ownership is largely irrelevant.
@@Nick.Martin. india is the largest manufacturer of vaccine
India investing in Britain because it can easily get EU excess
@@TH-cam_AMERICA Maybe, but Cambridge and Oxford Universties have the expertise for development. Isn’t that the main reason?
Its 2024 india{bharat} is 4 trillion economy❤❤
not yet
😂😂😂 dream
@@Nopeyes1currently 3.75 Trillion dollar economy it's too easy to 4 Trillion.
Our Target 5 trillion dollar economy in 2027 but I think we get in 2026 .
@@Kp-pd2jc se sob char tor account eh 15 lakh dhukheche
@@Nopeyes1 Ram Mandir baniyeche, 370 hatiye che, 54 Hazar KM Highway toiri hoyeche sei sob chokhe pore na
Well india hit 4 trillion recently
3.75 to be accurate. it will become 4 by the end of the year.
@@arpan9937 We're already in the end of the year. We're most prolly already past the 4 trillion mark by now. We'll just get to know about it when this FY ends
@@yugmathakkar4023by the end of FY23-24 India will be 4.1-4.2 trillion
@@Animefreak2005 Yup.
@@arpan9937It's already December 2023, hence the end of the year.
4th January 2023 = India that is BHARAT is not growing, its recovering 🔥🙏
India’s gdp is not 3.3 $trillion but 3.73 $ trillion.
When You guys arrived here india was the total 25% of the whole world GDP more than entire Europe 😅
That's because prior to Victorian times, all measures of national and regional productivity were estimated based on population, and India (even in the early 1700s) had a big population.
By the 1940s the Industrial Revolution meant that national productivity was determined mainly by the extent to which a nation had embraced technology.
India didn't fall from a highly-advanced and highly-productive super-nation into poverty. It merely failed to keep up with the pace of development in nations that were the seat of the Industrial Revolution (ie Britain, Europe and later, the USA) and its a period of around two centuries we're talking about here.
A further point worth considering is if India has been this incredibly powerful nation before colonialism, rather than a region of more than 100 princely states with no unified status at all, how would a small island in Northern Europe have been able to take control of it?
@tomjohnson9833 In the past, GDP was calculated using the Index of Industrial Production (IIP) to measure manufacturing and trading activity. The GDP was then estimated using the IIP data and updated using the Annual Survey of Industries (ASI) data and when the Industrial revolution began we were suffering internally bc of the sweet divide and eat policy
@@VXplain. pre-colonial Indian states did not keep the kinds of records that would allow an accurate estimate of IIP. That type of metric didn't exist until the 18th century
@VXplain. the Industrial revolution began in the 1670s, a century before any Indian states were controlled by Europeans
@@tomjohnson9833india contributed 25% to world GDP during Mughal period and 33% before that and if don't know india was a major exporter of weapons , textiles , food , spices , boats and ships , pottery , metallurgy and many more things .
India would one day own UK 💪 the prime is already an Indian
Switzerland, Poland, Ireland , Belgium, Netherlands etc are better options...UK, France, Germany, Sweden, Norway etc r unsafe due to their soft stand/ laws against peaceful radical immigrants spreading peace by beheading others.. Another observation is many Europeans, mainly French, dont speak English & then my French friends shared the reason behind it......After working with many nationalities, I can say with conviction that Indians ( with few exceptions) are one of the best people in the world...
bro now BELGIUM , IRELAND are more voilent than western europe what are you reading by peacefulls , only poland is safe but they don't let others to come except europeans
So I started this video and the ad that played before the video starts was of the new Range Rover 😂
God Bless India.
💙🇦🇺🇮🇳 ⚔️🙏
So every future generation of the British get reminded every single day Karma comes a full circle.
We are buying , what's actually ours
India should start a holding company called "The East India Company" and use that to buy UK companies 🙂
The west Uk company*
Karma hits back 🗿
If England becomes islamic nation like pakistan, saudi arab, then!?
@@koushikdas1992 that's never gonna happen
@@koushikdas1992Christians are the best population who know how to convert people by exploiting their situation
@@TheDieselDevil8yeah it's just we hindus who lack that
Looks How the Tables have Turned 😊
India is atleast BUYING in UK..... BUYING and not STEALING....like what the British did in India from 1818 to 1947 👍
Just to correct, India is a $4.3T economy and will be 3rd largest in a few years. $10T in less than a decade from now.
With Brits logic they are receiving aid from India.
Britain has a Indian PM.
He is not Indian but British. You mean Indian origin!?
By the way, India was a Developed Nation 500 to 600 years back. India was known for its spices, clothes, silks, metals, nice & cultured people etc. Europeans (Especially British) came as Traders and later ruled the Country. They did both Good & Bad things on India. Freedom is a Universal Right for every Individual and Nation irrespective of its people's race, colour, creed and caste. No Nation is inferior to any Nation. Subjugation to any Nation is a bygone era, its gone and dusted. Forceful subjugation is a crime, which happened 200 to 400 years back. Every Nation has its own potential and God given Natural Resources to become a Developed country depending on its right Institution, proper Governance, justice and rule of law. In olden days, Britain came to India to become more Wealthy country by utilising India's resources and people. Now, India is standing on its own to become again a Developed Nation by respecting International laws and rules and other countries systems. India has not looted any other country to become a Developed Nation. History repeats itself.
Great aerial shot of Chamba Himachal Pradesh India.