The rate of annual population loss - in former USSR countries - during the mid-1990s was more than double the rate of loss during the period of Stalinist repression and mass famine in the first half of the 1930s. Stalin's crimes pale in comparison with those of the average West European colonialist.
A lot of different names for the same shtick. Read Stalin's speeches and you will find him always talking about the cause of socialism and not the cause of communism. The Chinese Communist Party is self described as Socialism with Chinese characteristics 中国特色社会主义. And the man with the funny mustache was the head of the National Socialist German Workers' Party. That party spread hatred by pointing out how the people they hated were over represented in places of power and influence, that they held a guilt of their race, and that they represented a hegemony. The same ideology that is spread today in leftist universities and by the media. Mussolini was the son of a Socialist leader and he was at the top of the Italian Socialist party before a schism drove him out. Then he started the Italian Fascist party and published the party platform in his news paper. If you read that platform, it is clearly and unmistakably socialist. I read it to my leftist brother and he didn't have a problem with any of the points on the party platform and I suspect the vast majority of leftists would also embrace the points on the Italian Fascist Party Platform.
@@mlauntube Oh, would you look at that. My reply disappeared. I guess we know who did that. It wasn't the government since Trump just banned censorship. That only leaves google.
This isn't really as on point as some of your others because Trump is never accused of being a "commie"'; he and his ilk are the ones who do that. On the other hand, they do try to paint him as a nazi and a "Putin puppet," which is fairly close. But Trump is the one who xenophobically gripes about AntiFa, BLM, commies, and immigrants; Biden's flavor of fascism is to scream Nazi while funding nazi militias abroad, calling people foreign agents and censoring everyone. Both are fascist regimes. I am not even sure Trump is going to actually prevent Israel from stealing more land - looks like he is handing over a landgrab to Netanyahu under the pretense of saving people who have shown they would rather die on their land than have it stolen from them. MAYBE he will end the killing of Russians and Ukrainians but I'm not sure of that either. MAYBE he will stop funding that. Some think so. But he's not likely to stop funding the bombing -- it seems like the only way he can see to stop bombing Gaza is to hand over their lands to the "Judeo Nazis," a term coined by YESHAYAHU LEIBOWITZ, an Israeli philosopher, who used this to describe the zionists that demanded to keep the lands seized in the 6 Day War as plunder.
They compared Hitler with Mussolini, Genghis Khan, Attila the Hun and Napoleon. Hitler was also compared to ancient rulers like Philip of Macedon and Nebuchadnezzar
Google Nazi analogies for more. Leads to a good wikioedia article and one called - Philip 'Alias' Hitler by Adela M. Adam Vol. 10, No. 30 (May, 1941), pp. 105-113
Freedom of speech -- can't live with it, can't live without it. The right to be wrong when saying what you believe is true is the bedrock of freedom of the mind.
Even if you're making the point that people call Trump Hilter erroneously, this comparison sucks. Just because Democrats are fascist doeant mean Trump isnt.
After Elon was accused of Nazi salute, it reminded me of this. Although there are so many references to people being “Hitler”, and this is a great reminder at how often and erroneously the comparison is made
@Vernardnie-y1o You 'heard'. Mussolini, Fascism's founding father helpfully pointed out almost a century ago, fascism can be defined as when the interests of government and [big] business can barely be separated by a cigarette paper. Bingo. The US today has become, effectively, a crypto fascist imperialist state. Maybe those various fasces in the Capitol aren't just a coincidence?
@gerhard7 Fascism believes in corporatism and national syndicalism and believe as well anti parliamentary values such as, congress and the house of representatives. Fascism also believed the power of the nation show reside with a Nationalist person of great strength. Im not sure what the point you are arguing, are you calling Trump a Fascist? Are you calling him a Nazi? Or are you calling The government itself Neo-Fascist/Neo-Nazi?
Fascism, like Communism, doesn't have to follow an exact historical template in order for it to be repeating itself. Fascism is characterised in part by the disproportionate role big business plays in influencing the direction of national body politics. Whether nationalism is specifically and always co-opted into helping to advance and expedite that goal doesn't change what that ultimate goal is ie a government clearly captured by ever narrower, powerful, wealthy, influential, unaccountable interests. Both Mussolini's and then Hitler's political aspirations were famously initially achieved through the ballot box and whilst the appeal to nationalist spirits might have had some role to play in that success, far moreso in Hitler's case, it was only a cynical populist means to an end. Mussolini's early far left roots and later betrayal simply demonstrate how shallow his ideological commitment was to the working class cause and his overarching personal desire to achieve power. Back then the only question for him was likely by what path he was going to achieve his ambition. Was it by cosying up to big business, through 'the people' or, ideally, could he construct a narrative that apparently appealed to and reconciled the conflicting interests of both? Ironically this former socialist's rise to power and subsequent creation of a militarised totalitarian imperial expansionist Italian state was characterised by the often brutal suppression of labour unions and denial of workers' rights, certainly NOT their promotion. He was also the first ever leader to undertake the policy of privatisation of publicly owned assets ie the state instigated disposal of public assets to ever narrower wealthy private interests. In terms of America today, not for nothing did US Presidents Eisenhower and Biden recognise and seek to warn the American people in their departing addresses. The former referencing the obvious growing power of the country's military industrial complex and "scientific-technological elite" in 1961 and the latter that of America's 'emerging' super wealthy tech oligarchy and the obvious threat it poses to US democracy. Neither, interestingly, seeing fit to tackle these 'elites' themselves whilst they were best placed and, surprise surprise, in no small part both owed their lofty positions to.
I see where you’re coming from, how ever l have some disagreements, let me explain. Im going to go through how Fascism uses Control and Economy and how vastly that differs from the US. 2. Control Mussolini was when he in the Italian Communist Party was an Authoritative Socialist that believed in order for the revolution to succeed a strong government under the party to succeed. Since he was kicked out of the party and formed fascism his views of this only got more stronger and radical. This is why his view on the church had a 180. Communism is a for the most part, an atheist ideology. Mussolini was no exception to this and he was an atheist himself. Yet he strengthened and used the church and other conservative and right wing institutions. Why? Because like most Totalitarian ideologies Fascism uses traditions for control. Socialist and leftist totalitarian ideologies uses subversion and degradation to replace traditions with their own, Mussolini did what most right wing totalitarianism groups do and applied and used traditions for control. Mussolini appealed to Monarchy and Catholic traditions even though he did not like or Agee with these groups. Mussolini appealed to monarchists, aristocrats, capitalists, church, on the fence socialists, corporations. Mussolini even had on his headquarters the word yes written all over it. (Google the image, it’s interesting.) You might be thinking this is strengthening your agreement and if I’m saying Politicians don’t do that, you might argue that they are slowly trying to become totalitarian but the constitution is the big thing slowing them down. I agree with that argument, the reason I brought up control was to establish how Fascism wants and manifests control, now though now I’ve established that my next argument brings the points I disagree with you on your argument on what he did with that control an how that differs from the US.
But Hitler was way worse than Lucifer though, I mean, Lucifer might reign over hell and devour souls but at least he didn't gas 66 bajllion people in a de-lousing chamber.
So basically, you were like, "I'm mad at democrats. Now I am all about the criminal who they call hitler.". Like... OK. Did you ever have any principles?
It's not even clear who you're talking about when it comes to who you're calling a criminal. And if you think that there are no Democrats who are criminals, or even if you think there are no Democrats who are comparable to Hitler (Biden and Harris were happy to let a genocide happen for 15 months, after all, and genocides are what Nazis do), then you haven't been paying attention. And Trump got a ceasefire. I would have voted for him if I had any idea that he would pressure Netanyahu enough to get a ceasefire. Even if the ceasefire lasts only a single day, or a single minute, it's more than Biden did for Palestinians. I can't speak for Matt but as for me, I have principles. One of my principles says that I will never, ever support a man like Dick Cheney or anybody who is proud to get his endorsement. That neoconservatism is evil. And Democrats have become neocons. I voted for Obama in 2008 because he at least heavily implied that he would do the opposite of what Bush and Cheney had done. Instead, he took America from two wars to seven by doing drone strikes in nations Bush hadn't attacked yet and by intervening even more heavily in Libya and Syria, in all cases ending the lives of innocent civilians. I often wonder whether people who get angry at Matt because he dislikes Democrats were born very, very recently because they remember so little about previous decades and what politicians were doing during that time. Do you not remember the 2000s?
One would think an anti-communist organization would have gone with "Stalin".
The rate of annual population loss - in former USSR countries - during the mid-1990s was more than double the rate of loss during the period of Stalinist repression and mass famine in the first half of the 1930s. Stalin's crimes pale in comparison with those of the average West European colonialist.
@@BlackGoatofQohor What about West European Globalists (neo-colonialists) whose mission statement is population control.
Congratulations. That is the most incredible comment I have ever seen.
Hitler had become the symbol of evil by then. Logic had gone out the window
A lot of different names for the same shtick.
Read Stalin's speeches and you will find him always talking about the cause of socialism and not the cause of communism.
The Chinese Communist Party is self described as Socialism with Chinese characteristics 中国特色社会主义.
And the man with the funny mustache was the head of the National Socialist German Workers' Party.
That party spread hatred by pointing out how the people they hated were over represented in places of power and influence, that they held a guilt of their race, and that they represented a hegemony. The same ideology that is spread today in leftist universities and by the media.
Mussolini was the son of a Socialist leader and he was at the top of the Italian Socialist party before a schism drove him out. Then he started the Italian Fascist party and published the party platform in his news paper. If you read that platform, it is clearly and unmistakably socialist. I read it to my leftist brother and he didn't have a problem with any of the points on the party platform and I suspect the vast majority of leftists would also embrace the points on the Italian Fascist Party Platform.
HAHAHAHA. Yeah, Hitler/Commies/MLK. It just rolls off the tongue.
To this very day some people mindlessly repeat those smears as though they're the truth too.
Have you looked at the evidence to see if it is true?
@@mlauntube Yes, there is none. I could smear the FBI for the letter they sent to him, but I won't. You know the letter I'm talking about.
@@mlauntube Oh, would you look at that. My reply disappeared. I guess we know who did that. It wasn't the government since Trump just banned censorship. That only leaves google.
That's the trick, baby!
Repeat the propaganda, repeat the propaganda, repeat the propaganda!
It's hidden in newest if anyone cares to look. If you do happen to look can anyone tell me why it's shadowbanned?
Source: "MLK/FBI" (2020) documentary
What's your opinion on Matt Duss and Bernie just now claiming Elon Musk funded Neo-Nazi organizations?
This isn't really as on point as some of your others because Trump is never accused of being a "commie"'; he and his ilk are the ones who do that. On the other hand, they do try to paint him as a nazi and a "Putin puppet," which is fairly close. But Trump is the one who xenophobically gripes about AntiFa, BLM, commies, and immigrants; Biden's flavor of fascism is to scream Nazi while funding nazi militias abroad, calling people foreign agents and censoring everyone. Both are fascist regimes. I am not even sure Trump is going to actually prevent Israel from stealing more land - looks like he is handing over a landgrab to Netanyahu under the pretense of saving people who have shown they would rather die on their land than have it stolen from them. MAYBE he will end the killing of Russians and Ukrainians but I'm not sure of that either. MAYBE he will stop funding that. Some think so. But he's not likely to stop funding the bombing -- it seems like the only way he can see to stop bombing Gaza is to hand over their lands to the "Judeo Nazis," a term coined by YESHAYAHU LEIBOWITZ, an Israeli philosopher, who used this to describe the zionists that demanded to keep the lands seized in the 6 Day War as plunder.
Makes me wonder who they compared Adolph to before everyone came to love &know him.
"That Hi+ler is just like..."
Caesar?
They compared Hitler with Mussolini, Genghis Khan, Attila the Hun and Napoleon. Hitler was also compared to ancient rulers like Philip of Macedon and Nebuchadnezzar
Google Nazi analogies for more. Leads to a good wikioedia article and one called -
Philip 'Alias' Hitler
by Adela M. Adam
Vol. 10, No. 30 (May, 1941), pp. 105-113
Knowing the history of American propaganda, I’m surprised they didn’t compare Stalin to Eugene Debs.
@@maksimilijan5029 And Cyrus?
Freedom of speech -- can't live with it, can't live without it. The right to be wrong when saying what you believe is true is the bedrock of freedom of the mind.
At least they didn't have the internet.
bro come on
Bravo Matt!
That's The Average American Education System for ya.
Highest cost in the world, and run entirely by dems
@@favor4afavor823 and somehow, Republicans still think they're Communists.
@@favor4afavor823 yet Republicans still think that they're Communists.
@@favor4afavor823 Hardly. You've never looked into a Texas schoolbook, clearly.
some people deserve to be called it and some don't...
Agreed. Biden is Hitler.
Zealots like to see the "other side" as "demonic".
He must have been a better man than we’ve been told
talk about an oxymoron.
Good to know, thank you. 🙏🍉🕊
From the "Polish freedom fighters". Sounds familiar
If they didn't have the cartoon bogeyman persona of Hitler to label every political opponent with then they would have to invent him.
Actually our ruling class did invent him. The latest iteration in the series is Zekenskyy.
They don't know very well do they 😂
Well, thats...a first, for me atleast
Great documentary on CGTN The Point-Hub-Heat, Race to the Future and Modernization..Reporterfy Media-Cyrus Janssen-Carl Zha-Daniel Dumbrill..
Even if you're making the point that people call Trump Hilter erroneously, this comparison sucks. Just because Democrats are fascist doeant mean Trump isnt.
Yes! Keep doing the binary thinking thing that is making us all dumber!
"You say this, must mean that."
Just because you are a fascist doesn't mean you are at a "hitler" level.
Best 👌
Dum dum dum dum dum
After Elon was accused of Nazi salute, it reminded me of this. Although there are so many references to people being “Hitler”, and this is a great reminder at how often and erroneously the comparison is made
Are you indicating those who claim Trumpists are fascists are wrong?
Sonny Liston safid when Nuhammad Scwaerz be thairb
The fundamental difference being here that Trump happens to now lead an already fascist state whereas Hitler was central to creating one.
Hitler was our oligarchs' boy too.
People are this dumb
what........
@Vernardnie-y1o You 'heard'.
Mussolini, Fascism's founding father helpfully pointed out almost a century ago, fascism can be defined as when the interests of government and [big] business can barely be separated by a cigarette paper.
Bingo.
The US today has become, effectively, a crypto fascist imperialist state.
Maybe those various fasces in the Capitol aren't just a coincidence?
@gerhard7 Fascism believes in corporatism and national syndicalism and believe as well anti parliamentary values such as, congress and the house of representatives. Fascism also believed the power of the nation show reside with a Nationalist person of great strength. Im not sure what the point you are arguing, are you calling Trump a Fascist? Are you calling him a Nazi? Or are you calling The government itself Neo-Fascist/Neo-Nazi?
✊🔻🕊️🇵🇸🇱🇧🇸🇾🌍
except with MLK it was really stupid, obviously - others not so much
exactly! Elon is a fascist so the cap fits nicely.
Fascism, like Communism, doesn't have to follow an exact historical template in order for it to be repeating itself.
Fascism is characterised in part by the disproportionate role big business plays in influencing the direction of national body politics.
Whether nationalism is specifically and always co-opted into helping to advance and expedite that goal doesn't change what that ultimate goal is ie a government clearly captured by ever narrower, powerful, wealthy, influential, unaccountable interests.
Both Mussolini's and then Hitler's political aspirations were famously initially achieved through the ballot box and whilst the appeal to nationalist spirits might have had some role to play in that success, far moreso in Hitler's case, it was only a cynical populist means to an end.
Mussolini's early far left roots and later betrayal simply demonstrate how shallow his ideological commitment was to the working class cause and his overarching personal desire to achieve power.
Back then the only question for him was likely by what path he was going to achieve his ambition.
Was it by cosying up to big business, through 'the people' or, ideally, could he construct a narrative that apparently appealed to and reconciled the conflicting interests of both?
Ironically this former socialist's rise to power and subsequent creation of a militarised totalitarian imperial expansionist Italian state was characterised by the often brutal suppression of labour unions and denial of workers' rights, certainly NOT their promotion.
He was also the first ever leader to undertake the policy of privatisation of publicly owned assets ie the state instigated disposal of public assets to ever narrower wealthy private interests.
In terms of America today, not for nothing did US Presidents Eisenhower and Biden recognise and seek to warn the American people in their departing addresses.
The former referencing the obvious growing power of the country's military industrial complex and "scientific-technological elite" in 1961 and the latter that of America's 'emerging' super wealthy tech oligarchy and the obvious threat it poses to US democracy.
Neither, interestingly, seeing fit to tackle these 'elites' themselves whilst they were best placed and, surprise surprise, in no small part both owed their lofty positions to.
sorry my reply got deleted let me try again
@Vernardnie-y1o YT is not keen on the dialectic I'm afraid.
Eh, still going to try again a little later, I wrote a Whole essay but yeah…
@@Vernardnie-y1o Make sure to copy and save before sending.
I see where you’re coming from, how ever l have some disagreements, let me explain. Im going to go through how Fascism uses Control and Economy and how vastly that differs from the US.
2. Control
Mussolini was when he in the Italian Communist Party was an Authoritative Socialist that believed in order for the revolution to succeed a strong government under the party to succeed.
Since he was kicked out of the party and formed fascism his views of this only got more stronger and radical. This is why his view on the church had a 180. Communism is a for the most part, an atheist ideology. Mussolini was no exception to this and he was an atheist himself.
Yet he strengthened and used the church and other conservative and right wing institutions. Why? Because like most Totalitarian ideologies Fascism uses traditions for control. Socialist and leftist totalitarian ideologies uses subversion and degradation to replace traditions with their own, Mussolini did what most right wing totalitarianism groups do and applied and used traditions for control. Mussolini appealed to Monarchy and Catholic traditions even though he did not like or Agee with these groups. Mussolini appealed to monarchists, aristocrats, capitalists, church, on the fence socialists, corporations.
Mussolini even had on his headquarters the word yes written all over it. (Google the image, it’s interesting.)
You might be thinking this is strengthening your agreement and if I’m saying Politicians don’t do that, you might argue that they are slowly trying to become totalitarian but the constitution is the big thing slowing them down. I agree with that argument, the reason I brought up control was to establish how Fascism wants and manifests control, now though now I’ve established that my next argument brings the points I disagree with you on your argument on what he did with that control an how that differs from the US.
He was also compared to Lucifer on that sign!
But Hitler was way worse than Lucifer though, I mean, Lucifer might reign over hell and devour souls but at least he didn't gas 66 bajllion people in a de-lousing chamber.
That too
What's the takeaway supposed to be here?
Two battered Cod and some chips.
Thinking am teh hard.
I'm definitely getting a "pick me" vibe from this one as well.
some people deserve to be called it and some don't...
The political establishment will label any opponent of theirs "Hitler."
That's the takeaway.
MLK Hitler? No. Elon Musk? Hard to say.
So basically, you were like, "I'm mad at democrats. Now I am all about the criminal who they call hitler.".
Like... OK. Did you ever have any principles?
It's not even clear who you're talking about when it comes to who you're calling a criminal. And if you think that there are no Democrats who are criminals, or even if you think there are no Democrats who are comparable to Hitler (Biden and Harris were happy to let a genocide happen for 15 months, after all, and genocides are what Nazis do), then you haven't been paying attention. And Trump got a ceasefire. I would have voted for him if I had any idea that he would pressure Netanyahu enough to get a ceasefire. Even if the ceasefire lasts only a single day, or a single minute, it's more than Biden did for Palestinians.
I can't speak for Matt but as for me, I have principles. One of my principles says that I will never, ever support a man like Dick Cheney or anybody who is proud to get his endorsement. That neoconservatism is evil. And Democrats have become neocons. I voted for Obama in 2008 because he at least heavily implied that he would do the opposite of what Bush and Cheney had done. Instead, he took America from two wars to seven by doing drone strikes in nations Bush hadn't attacked yet and by intervening even more heavily in Libya and Syria, in all cases ending the lives of innocent civilians.
I often wonder whether people who get angry at Matt because he dislikes Democrats were born very, very recently because they remember so little about previous decades and what politicians were doing during that time. Do you not remember the 2000s?
u love elon>?
What has Elon done wrong for someone to hate him?
Well I know he ain’t a goddam Nazi
@ In one of the senses it is commonly used, to mean being very racist, I would say he is though.