Here are a couple meta-analysis: Leichsenring, F., & Leibing, E. (2003). The effectiveness of psychodynamic therapy and cognitive behavior therapy in the treatment of personality disorders: A meta-analysis. Leichsenring, F., & Rabung, S. (2008). Effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. Driessen, E., Cuijpers, P., de Maat, S. C., Abbass, A. A., de Jonghe, F., & Dekker, J. J. (2010). The efficacy of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy for depression: a meta-analysis. Steinert, C., Munder, T., Rabung, S., Hoyer, J., & Leichsenring, F. (2017). Psychodynamic therapy: as efficacious as other empirically supported treatments? A meta-analysis testing equivalence of outcomes. Keefe, J. R., McMain, S. F., McCarthy, K. S., Zilcha-Mano, S., Dinger, U., Sahin, Z., ... & Barber, J. P. (2019). A meta-analysis of psychodynamic treatments for borderline and cluster C personality disorders.
I think this emphasis on needing to show an effect of therapy stems from the feelings of inadequacy that lie within the fields of psychology and psychiatry. We talk so much about being in the "grey" but can't help but try to force our fields into being more black and white. Psychiatry is desperate to find "biomarkers" so we can "prove" depression, anxiety etc. With therapy and this push for EBPs (Evidence Based Psychotherapies) it's CBT-based therapies needing to prove not only that they are effective, but that therapy has some meaningful, measureable, effect. Oh look, CPT and PE reduced PTSD symptoms one level of severity after 16 weeks. Ah ha! It treats PTSD. It's done a disservice to our field. We need a paradigm shift
I think that's why Steven Hayes invent ACT as another alternative to CBT. As CBT is only good for short term problems. Although I have read that psychodynamic therapy in the long term is pretty beneficial.
Whats the point when your body is on the verge of shutdown from severe lack of nutrition? Not only limited by field of speech, biology as well. Like. What's the point of therapy when your deficiencies are biologically causing depression. Could work when in a period of recovery to uncover why the traumatic response occurs, and follows a repetition complex (attempt to master and subjugate trauma/ simulatenously being a known, predicted scenario, where even comfort in failure provides solace even at the fact of a greater self-destruction.) Knowledge of Truth does not set you free.
Sorry to be 3 years late,psychoanalysis I believe is not about numbers it is about the mental personal I'd what the person calls themselves and work with therapy around the personality,not to be measured in numbers
Here are a couple meta-analysis:
Leichsenring, F., & Leibing, E. (2003). The effectiveness of psychodynamic therapy and cognitive behavior therapy in the treatment of personality disorders: A meta-analysis.
Leichsenring, F., & Rabung, S. (2008). Effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy: A meta-analysis.
Driessen, E., Cuijpers, P., de Maat, S. C., Abbass, A. A., de Jonghe, F., & Dekker, J. J. (2010). The efficacy of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy for depression: a meta-analysis.
Steinert, C., Munder, T., Rabung, S., Hoyer, J., & Leichsenring, F. (2017). Psychodynamic therapy: as efficacious as other empirically supported treatments? A meta-analysis testing equivalence of outcomes.
Keefe, J. R., McMain, S. F., McCarthy, K. S., Zilcha-Mano, S., Dinger, U., Sahin, Z., ... & Barber, J. P. (2019). A meta-analysis of psychodynamic treatments for borderline and cluster C personality disorders.
Dear Alexandre, thanks a lot! We hope the viewers will consult the reading list you have so generously offered.
Thanks!
thank you Alexandre!
Thnaks for sharing links... it helped in my finals
You are awesome, I'm looking for meta-analyses on psychodynamic theory right now for my final paper, this is so great. Thank you!
Excellent info
I think this emphasis on needing to show an effect of therapy stems from the feelings of inadequacy that lie within the fields of psychology and psychiatry. We talk so much about being in the "grey" but can't help but try to force our fields into being more black and white. Psychiatry is desperate to find "biomarkers" so we can "prove" depression, anxiety etc. With therapy and this push for EBPs (Evidence Based Psychotherapies) it's CBT-based therapies needing to prove not only that they are effective, but that therapy has some meaningful, measureable, effect. Oh look, CPT and PE reduced PTSD symptoms one level of severity after 16 weeks. Ah ha! It treats PTSD.
It's done a disservice to our field. We need a paradigm shift
I think that's why Steven Hayes invent ACT as another alternative to CBT. As CBT is only good for short term problems. Although I have read that psychodynamic therapy in the long term is pretty beneficial.
Why does psychoanalysis not work for bulimia (or has its limitations)?
Whats the point when your body is on the verge of shutdown from severe lack of nutrition?
Not only limited by field of speech, biology as well.
Like.
What's the point of therapy when your deficiencies are biologically causing depression.
Could work when in a period of recovery to uncover why the traumatic response occurs, and follows a repetition complex (attempt to master and subjugate trauma/ simulatenously being a known, predicted scenario, where even comfort in failure provides solace even at the fact of a greater self-destruction.)
Knowledge of Truth does not set you free.
Sorry to be 3 years late,psychoanalysis I believe is not about numbers it is about the mental personal I'd what the person calls themselves and work with therapy around the personality,not to be measured in numbers
Who's this guy?🙂
It's BP's Dr. Nicolás Lorenzini :)
www.mittelweg50.com/nicolas-lorenzini
www.ian-attachment.org.uk/team/nicolas-lorenzini/
www.complicated.life/en/find-a-therapist/berlin/psychoanalyst-psychotherapist-doctor-in-psychology-nicolas-lorenzini
no it does not