I think you just gave Legacy Photo some of my money today😄😄😄. Going to have to pick up a roll and play with it. Love all your pics but it looks like 200 is the sweet spot for a more "conventional" look. Might try a few frames at 100 and see how the film handles it. Great stuff as usual!
Haha, thanks for watching, dude. Yeah I figured if it's predecessor, Lomo Metropolis was good at 200 for portraits than this stuff couldn't be too far off.
This camera is so heavy. I always mount it on a monopod. It's helps a lot. I recently got my hands on the additional diopter lens for the hood and the type E screen. I couldn't believe it: this thing actually cost 25 dollars back in the days, but I had to pay 650 dollars on ebay, which is the current average price of the item since it's hard to find...
Man talk about the retro look. Those look like they came right out from the 1970's. When you watch a lot of the old movies a lot of them did not have a lot of color to those old films. I think the older films like 1950 and a little up used some kind of weird technology to film in black and white but get color out of it. They loaded black and white film in then had a RGB filter spinning in the camera or the projector. That's why if I remember right those older films had a unrealistic poppy colors. I like some of the photos the ones that are warm. I'm not saying your posing is off. I'm just not digging extreme retro look from the 1970's. Some of them look way to flat.
You have very good videos and photos, but why are there so few views, there should be at least 100 times more
These are beautifully retro. Great work and chemistry.
Thank you. Really loving the look of this film in 120.
I think you just gave Legacy Photo some of my money today😄😄😄. Going to have to pick up a roll and play with it. Love all your pics but it looks like 200 is the sweet spot for a more "conventional" look. Might try a few frames at 100 and see how the film handles it. Great stuff as usual!
Haha, thanks for watching, dude. Yeah I figured if it's predecessor, Lomo Metropolis was good at 200 for portraits than this stuff couldn't be too far off.
This shoot would have been sick with some fill flash
This camera is so heavy. I always mount it on a monopod. It's helps a lot. I recently got my hands on the additional diopter lens for the hood and the type E screen. I couldn't believe it: this thing actually cost 25 dollars back in the days, but I had to pay 650 dollars on ebay, which is the current average price of the item since it's hard to find...
Haha! It definitely does get a bit heavy after a while of holding it. Thanks for watching!
Man talk about the retro look. Those look like they came right out from the 1970's. When you watch a lot of the old movies a lot of them did not have a lot of color to those old films.
I think the older films like 1950 and a little up used some kind of weird technology to film in black and white but get color out of it. They loaded black and white film in then had a RGB filter spinning in the camera or the projector. That's why if I remember right those older films had a unrealistic poppy colors.
I like some of the photos the ones that are warm. I'm not saying your posing is off. I'm just not digging extreme retro look from the 1970's. Some of them look way to flat.
Really love the retro look as well. Thanks for watching!! 👌🏾📸