God eternal (timeless) Time figure/symbol/image of our finite existence (shows that we are temporal) Time shows our need for God because God is timeless (infinite) God coming into time is the same story of Jesus Christ The eternal being breaking through our fallen nature which will lead us to eventually die thus time merely represents our separation from God and the consequences of such actions Timelessness goes into time to allow us to reconcile us to himself
most are. Like Craig, they simply make things up and have no evidence for their claims. They insist that their magic jesus existed but have no evdience for that at all. Then they run to "historical jesus" who they don't worship.
@@velkyn1 The idea that Jesus never existed is like the flat-eartherism of historical studies. Not even atheist historians claim that Jesus didn't exist. - RF Admin
@@drcraigvideosI am. Jews, as we know them, did not exist. They were ancient Hebrews whose laws make up the basis for what the Jews worship. Christ came to do away with the practices of the religious leaders at the time, who made the choice to reject Jesus and continue their teachings - teachings which make up what we now call Judaism. The term Jew didn't even appear in our language until rather recently and when it did, it was to represent a person from the province of Judea. The greatest modern lie is the Jews convincing the world they are direct descendants of ancient Hebrews, it is the basis of all their deceit and self grandiosity
To be charitable to the original commenter, maybe he’s honestly unaware of Craig’s body of work and decades of directly engaging with criticism and arguments against Christianity, both in person with criticism and through his academic and popular level publications. Some people may see these short clips and think he’s just some random Christian on TH-cam among the see of other shorts online.
The only reason you could say its not history is if you have a hidden bias against such things happening. That means you aren't really in a position to say it didn't. You can believe it didn't but that is just a matter of theology, not history.
Why not both! I dont think anyone will disagree with your point that it is theology. But without “history” and the chronology of Jesus’ ancestry, His theology and Christology begins to diminish. In the same way without the “history” of blood shed by the eyewitnesses of the Resurrection, the resurrection itself begins to diminish. Just saying the Resurrection is a matter of theology without the history, or the rest of the story that is backed up by history, not just the Bible accounts but the extra biblical accounts also, the “resurrection” begins to diminish. It doesn’t go away because it is theology sound, but much harder to teach, prove, understand… Peace!!!
@@srich7503 I wanted to reply, but you're all over the place, meaning no personal disrespect. I just couldn't nail down what you were asserting in opposition to me.
I love the phases
Thank you for unceasingly speaking about the veracity of the New Testament accounts of Jesusʼ life, Dr. Craig.
Do you realize that none of the authors of these documents had any idea they would be collected into a book and be read 2,000 years later?
Bart Ehrman and these other ‘bible critics’ just blatantly lie in their books and should be held accountable for this
You're like a pizza delivery driver claiming astrophysicists are wrong about the age of the Earth and should be locked up for it. LOL
Once you find the truth, no one else can come along and take it from you.
God eternal (timeless)
Time figure/symbol/image of our finite existence (shows that we are temporal)
Time shows our need for God because God is timeless (infinite)
God coming into time is the same story of Jesus Christ
The eternal being breaking through our fallen nature which will lead us to eventually die thus time merely represents our separation from God and the consequences of such actions
Timelessness goes into time to allow us to reconcile us to himself
most are. Like Craig, they simply make things up and have no evidence for their claims. They insist that their magic jesus existed but have no evdience for that at all. Then they run to "historical jesus" who they don't worship.
Correct, Jesus was thoroughly Jewish, an idea they are still fighting 2,000 years later.
@@ji8044 no evidence that one existed either but there may be a higher probability of that than the legend of jesus being made up entirely.
@@ji8044 Who's denying that Jesus was Jewish? Certainly not Dr. Craig. - RF Admin
@@velkyn1 The idea that Jesus never existed is like the flat-eartherism of historical studies. Not even atheist historians claim that Jesus didn't exist. - RF Admin
@@drcraigvideosI am. Jews, as we know them, did not exist. They were ancient Hebrews whose laws make up the basis for what the Jews worship. Christ came to do away with the practices of the religious leaders at the time, who made the choice to reject Jesus and continue their teachings - teachings which make up what we now call Judaism. The term Jew didn't even appear in our language until rather recently and when it did, it was to represent a person from the province of Judea. The greatest modern lie is the Jews convincing the world they are direct descendants of ancient Hebrews, it is the basis of all their deceit and self grandiosity
I guess Craig would have to engage with someones actual criticism, rather than a hypotheitcal interlocutor, for this to be useful
I guess you would have to actually elaborate on what you mean, rather than just make a vauge assertion, for your comment to be useful.
Craig has debated plenty of folks. So he is not in a bubble.
@@gfujigo
Amen. And written works aplenty. Books and online materials
@@jamesedward3619 I love this response. Touché to the original commenter. LOL
To be charitable to the original commenter, maybe he’s honestly unaware of Craig’s body of work and decades of directly engaging with criticism and arguments against Christianity, both in person with criticism and through his academic and popular level publications. Some people may see these short clips and think he’s just some random Christian on TH-cam among the see of other shorts online.
The Resurrection is a matter of theology, not history.
Believe it if you want as such. Don't try to teach it as history.
The only reason you could say its not history is if you have a hidden bias against such things happening. That means you aren't really in a position to say it didn't. You can believe it didn't but that is just a matter of theology, not history.
Why not both! I dont think anyone will disagree with your point that it is theology. But without “history” and the chronology of Jesus’ ancestry, His theology and Christology begins to diminish. In the same way without the “history” of blood shed by the eyewitnesses of the Resurrection, the resurrection itself begins to diminish. Just saying the Resurrection is a matter of theology without the history, or the rest of the story that is backed up by history, not just the Bible accounts but the extra biblical accounts also, the “resurrection” begins to diminish. It doesn’t go away because it is theology sound, but much harder to teach, prove, understand…
Peace!!!
Its history
@@blusheep2 45 years as a historian, so you're right. I have a bias . . . toward actual history.
@@srich7503 I wanted to reply, but you're all over the place, meaning no personal disrespect. I just couldn't nail down what you were asserting in opposition to me.