I just watched that episode and was upset they that stupid jury could find him guilty on zero evidence. His son being with him the whole time besides 1 minute water breaks should've been enough reasonable doubt. Basically convicting him because (as usual) "he didn't act right". Also that judge gave him life without parole when he's suppose to be a professional and knew there was nothing proving him guilty. The American justice system really sucks!
I was shocked at the conviction as well. I really half expected the judge to override the jury and tell them that there was legally not enough evidence to convict him. Unlike the fact that he can’t make the attorney’s objections for them…. I believe he could have directed a not guilty verdict BEFORE it went to the jury. Or maybe just a directed decision to dismiss the case on grounds that the state lacked sufficient evidence. There was a disconnect on the explanation of what is real evidence and what is not evidence to the jury!
I’m late but when I watched the trial the prosecution team seemed to be forcing lies constantly. I said then that there is no way that fake left those wounds that close together. And, he would have had to pull the rake out of her to hit her twice. That would have left more than 4 holes in her jacket. The desperation 911 calls were crazy. He never said go to hell lying whore.
This case is very interesting, I really do believe the evidence points to an accident. It bothers me that a person is in prison, when no crime was committed.
@@addysbeeandgarden320you’re going to have to take it to them. They’ll never do anything from a TH-cam video. You’re going to have to press the issue in a severe way. That’s the only way.
I feel bad, this guy had horrible lawyers. His lawyer wouldn’t go with the accident theory he wanted to. Anybody who has worked on a farm, in a compound or hanger or anything of the sort knows it is VERY common to designate people to get equipment from other areas. All this math talk. What if she fell on the rake in a small barn hallway and as she was pushing herself up and twisting away fell back down onto it, seems there would be more than 4 holes to me. She would not die immediately and could be crawling for help thus rolled to her stomach. The reality of being able to hit someone with a rake accurately and powerfully enough twice in succession and kill them with no bruising and defensive injuries is hard to accept for me. What if the son did it ? That audio recording stuff was smokescreen garbage. The only things that could potentially condemn him are the google searches but he could have just been curious what ancient cultures used to do to cheating, unfaithful partners. It made me curious to know from seeing that search history. If the video equipment could have been tampered with. This is the biggest problem. I hope he gets another trial….
Yeah but she had been a habitual cheater and he had made multiple concessions to keep the family together. I'm not saying it warranted any kind of violence but the frustration level must have been pretty high. I can see him trying to catch her cheating again, especially since the surgery she was recovering from THAT day was an abortion 2/3 days before. Maybe he was searching catching a cheating wife and that suggestion came up. Algorithms offers individual interests, as in "the history of cheating wives," or any manner of other rabbit trails to keep you clicking. The guy kept the kids going to afterschool stuff and the daily weight of a family while she traveled multiple times on party cruises with all her friends. This during busy harvest times, etc. She was meeting up w the farm equipment salesmen to commit adultery in his truck while the guy made weekly visits to Mills' farm. The salesmen projected to leave his wife only after his kids were grown. She was a known cheater by his friends before they even married. She had also spent weeks away at a brother's? house planning to have a place if she divorced. Mullins seemed to make many concessions. My question was why would it be on this day when she was seemingly being more involved and a part of family for him to strike her in a rage? He sure didn't "have the time," during thus cycle of the pigs and field issue.
A farmer is NOT going to kill his wife with a huge load of piglets on their way. What was happening before the corn rake? She was very dizzy and Todd had her stop, go rest, but oh hey can you grab the pet carrier? When do people fall and have accidents? When they have dizziness! And let's say he did it. Does it make sense to send his son in to find his mom? No.
Seriously. It’s impossible to know if you poked someone with a corn rake twice, that it’s certain they’re dead. He’s not going to then mosey back over and wait for his son to find a possibly still-living witness who could attest that he stuck her.
This is a case that is heavy on my thoughts, your analysis of the wounds made me gasp because the twisting of the rake makes perfect sense. Even if she didnt pass out, she could have simply been in shock or inable to move due to the injuries to her back/near her spine. They accused him of saying "cheating wh*re" on the 9 1 1 call when I believe he was saying "1 2 3 4" while counting aloud during chest compressions. There are endless theories here but, as I'm sure you agree with, the most obvious scenario is usually the truth. Im still shocked at how far they reached for the conclusion they came to, much less that so many people agreed with it.
The defense surrendered the accident theory in opening statements, but I really feel like it is likely what really happened. But it bothers me how Todd seemed to be pretty ok about the cheating and made no strong denials during the police interview. I think he had way too much going on to plan a murder that day. The 911 stuff is just inaudible and a pretty dirty trick.
I agree 100%. As for the Google searches, I might be searching sites like that too if my wife cheated on me all the time. I'd probably be angry at times. Doesn't mean I'd kill her. Sort of like internet venting...interventing.
Also according to their son Todd Mullis asked his wife to do what would have amounted to a halfminute job in a shed on her way back into the house. The state then said he waited until his son SOMETIME THAT MORNING went to get a drink so he could go to the shed and do the dirty deed. But he would have had to have assumed she was long gone from the shed. He did not give her a long lasting job in that shed. Does the state think she was knitting booties in the shed so she could be there when Todd got a chance to go to the shed. It's an utterly goofy conclusion that the state made, that the defence didn't catch, and that the jury fell for. God bless that man and his children.
I never thought he was guilty. His lawyers and that town are a joke. He was the richest guy in town and they wanted what he had and they got it. That’s my opinion.
You forgot the internet searches, him caught calling her a "whore" on the 911 call, and I guess people are to believe she ACCIDENTLY fell with such great force that she sustained fatal injuries on a corn rake. Not once but twice. An innocent man who loves his wife also doesn't smirk on the witness stand.
@@teddyjam8134, the internet searches were hers. It's pretty clear that she was the one with add, when he searched something he searched it once, she would skip from one thing to another, it's pretty common. He was doing cpr and gasping 3-4 which would sound a lot like cheating whore. He was mouth breathing, try doing 2 minutes of cpr and say anything, And yes a backwards fall from standing absolutely could cause the first cornrake injury, the second was when the cornrake rotated, he was a substantial enough man he could have pulled out the cornrake and struck her again. There wasn't a second blow, the rake rotated, her weight would've been enough for a shallow pierce through thin rib muscle. And I highly doubt he would have missed. Twice...
@@addysbeeandgarden320 Do you not know people watched that trail? Those internet searches were not hers, and his gasping for air is laughable. I heard "whore" on that 911 call. And no one with any common sense would believe that a person especially a person of her size could fall backwards with enough force for that corn rake to impale her body. Also, what about him smirking on the witness stand when the prosecutor asked him about the 911 call? No husband who loves his wife would do that. I don't know you, but if you are a person who values the truth, I think you need to take another look at everything you've said here. Not sure why some of you guys want to coddle criminals.
@@teddyjam8134If you have ever listened to the call before someone has told you oh it sounds like he is saying “cheating *****” you would more than likely hear mumbling, nothing at all, 1-2-3-4,or just 3-4. I myself didn’t hear anything but heavy breathing and muffled mumbling but then when the prosecutor says what your supposed to hear you have now fooled your mind into believing it’s their when it most likely isn’t, therefore the 911 call evidence is bogus and should not have stood for the case.
If Todd wanted to kill her he could have just waited or even fed her to hogs he rushed her to hospital knowing she was alive on the way why would a killer do that ?
I agree. Also it was his body language that didn't match up with someone lying under those extreme circumstances. People say he seems cold. Hes lost his wife & is looking at losing his life, well freedom for the rest of it anyway. So most people would look stressed or unhappy. I feel he looked like he was telling the truth. Also this lady's video has a very good point which never got mentioned, which strikes me as it being an accident. The rake inpaling her twice in the same spot. Unless the 'murderer' was a professional darts player its really unlikely. But if you've fell on top of it & your trying to pull it out while you're panicking in extreme pain, there's a chance she could have fell on to it again at a different angle while part of it was still stuck in her chest.
I agree with you on one thing: it is common for people in emergency situations to drive to the hospital. I think that youre a little too sure of yourself considering the following: 1. The kennel was never moved. 2. Where are these mysterious "wall nails"? Are we supposed to just take your word for it? 3. Downplaying her knee injuries and chalking it up to "motrin bruises" is more than a little exaggerated. You know that. Come on. You being "100% sure" is quite a reach considering your entire basis for the two objects that set off this rake accident aren't proven at all. Are we just supposed to take your word for it that there were random nails in walls that arent confirmed causing her to drop a kennel that wasnt moved? Look, I would have more respect for your idea if you said "this is my theory" and not come off like this is "100%" accurate. Lastly, Is it true you are friendly with Todd?
I think this is a better theory than any other information I have heard. Thanks for taking the time to research this and post it hopefully someone will listen.
YOU FORGOT THR EVIDENCE where she just had surgery and was NOT to lift anything over 10 pounds. YET AFTER getting dizzy enough to stop cleaning lights, because she was dizzy and bleeding, Todd 'sends her to the red barn' to get a heavy pet carrier. Ask yourself why that fork was conveniently placed in there as well. The pathway was 30 inches wide. NO WAY DID SHE magically fall back on a fork. AT LEAST TWICE.
I watched the trial… i knew he was innocent.. you are so right.. they should’ve had you for the defendant side . So much was wrong about the whole thing… it could be anybody
Common sense and evidence show there was NO ONE else that could have done it, and evidence for sure shows this was a freak accident that she was stabbed in the back, at least TWICE, hard enough to basically go through her, get up, and fall back on it again, then and fell to her knees. All the while disturbing nothing in a 30-inch pathway. The mysterious magical corn rake, HARDLY. The worst part was he sent his 14-year-old son to find her to try and establish an alibi.
The tine injuries were straight into her body. So how was he holding this corn rake when he stabbed her? Keeping in mind the tines are at a 90 degree angle. What really seems more likely here?
The kennel was never moved. It still had dust on it . So you're wrong about the wounds. And you must be Todd's friend if I'm not mistaken . And you're saying you know more than the medical examiner right ?
I guess we are just supposed to take her word for it that there were random nails in walls that arent confirmed causing her to drop a kennel that wasnt moved. She's a paramedic who apparently is an expert in forensic analysis without having ever been to the scene and changing the evidnece to fit her theory. Normally, this would be okay under a title like "my theory" not "100% innocent" that's just too bold considering.
Hot garbage, I could have done a better job of defending him! Imo, I would have never allowed the prosecution to say what they thought he was saying on the 911 tape. I didn't get into it on the video, but after carrying her to the car, and then doing cpr, there's no way he was saying sentances. He was making the noise of someone who was winded pushing air out of his lungs in order to get a bigger breath the next time. It's called a mondegreen, and it shouldn't have been allowed, period. There are several tiktok videos proving this. I think he was trying to count coupled with the "ch" sound that an athlete makes. Have you ever seen the "Friends" episode where Rachel runs and she's going ch ch ch with every breath? It's a valid way to ensure proper oxygenation. At the beginning he was saying one, two, one two; eventually it switched to three, four, three, four, which could sound like cheating whore when coupled with the ch sound. There's a lot of things I would have rebutted like the weight of the kennel. Weight is subjective. He's a big farmer, strong, he didn't think the kennel was that heavy, he was likely the person who put it up, to him, it wasn't that heavy, it was no big deal, he probably swung it up into position single handed. My husband can carry one in each hand no problem. I can only carry 1, in the front but he doesn't think about that when he asks me to grab them because to him it was no big deal to carry them around.
I'm sorry but you guys have no idea what ur talking about I mean come on really all the evidence points right at him the Google searches the affair and he absolutely was not gonna give her half his stuff especially her having an affair I mean seriously feel sorry for him all u want but he's guilty and gonna spend the rest of his miserable life in prison!!
All wounds on her back were caused by the rake. There were no nail injuries. She never reached the pet carrier. You got some of it right, but this isn't proof that he's innocent. I think he's innocent, but this isn't the proof.
No they weren't, like I said, wounds c And d were too small and too close together to be caused by the corn rake. There was also only 2 wounds for that set of injuries, not 4. It couldn't have been the corn rake. And just because the kennel was still on the shelf doesn't mean she didn't try to pick it up.
@@addysbeeandgarden320 We know all wounds were caused by the fork. It's empirical, proven by the fact that her coat only had 4 holes. You should read the post conviction relief documents. They will help understand exactly what happened. Specifically the biomechanical engineer report.
I tend to agree that the two smaller punctures couldn’t have been from the rake. I believe there was discussion that they were caused at the hospital? Regardless, I agree that the circumference and spacing of those smaller wounds eliminate the rake from making them. The fact that her coat had only 4 punctures eliminates the possibility that anyone at all was wielding that rake. In order to strike a second time it would have to be pulled free from her coat in order to swing it again. Period. Such ineptitude was demonstrated in this whole farce of an investigation and trial! Thank you for taking the time and trouble to make this video. I believe your theory comes a lot closer to the truth than the coroner’s!
I agree, I always believed he was innocent too. Personally, I think if somebody did murder Amy, it may have been her lover's wife who knew about it. If she wasn't murdered, and I remember hearing during that trial that she was feeling really dizzy while she was cleaning, and it is very possible she could have climbed up on something and just fell backwards onto the rake. I think her husband should definitely appeal this case. This so sad for her husband and for her children too.
YOU CANNOT explain away the fact she just had surgery and the idiot asked her to go lift and get a pet carrier that THEY LIKELY HADN'T USED IN YEARS. COMMON SENSE. Ad this was after she already said she was dizzy and bleeding earlier. NO WAY. I believe he was a control freak, she was his farm slave and he exploded over the affair.
There's no evidence at all that he exploded. He had already forgiven 1 affair, and probably was trying to pretend the second didn't happen. He went and picked her up and took care of her for several days after the surgery. Her family lived close by and her mom wasn't there to pick her up or help out? You couldn't keep my mom away after surgery, she would have been right there at the center waiting with my husband, cleaning my house afterwards, taking care of the kids, bowing to my every whim, but she wasn't. Her surgery was likely something quick, and simple like a tubal or an ablation or both and no one thought it was a big deal, including her. He didn't ask for her help, she came out and asked to help. Weight is absolutely subjective, this was a big strong farmer. There's a difference between gym strong and farm boy strong, and that guy was farm boy strong. In his brain, that kennel weighed nothing, and he was giving her an easy chore that didn't require her to stand on a bucket, and was a lot closer to the house AND he didn't ask her to bring it back, he asked her to put it outside the building it was in. She could have also said "no I think that kennel is too heavy", or "I didn't feel good enough to get the kennel, I'm going to go lay down", but she agreed. She's got plenty of patient advocate experience, she fights dumb doctors for a living. Furthermore, medical people are the worst most non-compliant patients on the face of the planet (ask me how I know). She knew what she was supposed to do after the surgery, she could have reread the discharge instructions and stayed her ass in bed, but she didn't. He didn't ask for her help, she went out looking for work.
@@addysbeeandgarden320 First off, nothing you offered was "proof". Also, must be fun to make up your own evidence. You're literally making up scenarios out of thin air and calling them "proof" So now her wounds are from nails in the wall?? And where exactly is your proof that there were nails in the wall? You do realize that it was 25°F that day, right? It was a cold, chilly November day and she was wearing a thick coat. No way with all those layers on is she going to get scratched by backing into nails lol. Secondly, it's impossible that she accidentally fell with enough force to puncture her internal organs, not once, but twice. Sorry, the only way that force is possible is by someone swinging it at her. Another thing, the coroner never said Amy was definitively hit with the rake 3 times. She said 2 times, and possibly 3. Also, are we supposed to ignore all the rest of the evidence? The internet searches. Amy's own words where she's telling people "if anything happens to me", telling others possible places she might be found if she went missing.
@@addysbeeandgarden320 He had already exploded, or was about to. His internet searches, for one, tell a very different story than the one you're claiming. You can tell by the things he looked up, that he was secretly seething. Secondly, Amy said herself on the very day it happened, that things were very tense. She also made it very clear that she feared him and feared for her life Lastly, he had not forgiven the first affair. Because if he had, he wouldn't have had her on such a short leash and had her reporting to him every time she went somewhere and timing her each time she left the house.
Listen to the trial. Twisting evidence to make a TH-cam video means NOTHING!!!. Her version of the second strike??? Laughable. EAsily explained by victim moving after the first strike.
His lawyer was just horrible during trial and definitely was cause for his verdict. An accident should have been entered as a possibility!
The cause for his verdict was the fact that he rammed a corn rake in his wife's back.
I always believed Todd was innocent
Me too
Same! That trial had my blood pressure pushed to the limit let me tell ya. He’s sitting in prison for life for something he didn’t do.
Me too.
I just watched that episode and was upset they that stupid jury could find him guilty on zero evidence.
His son being with him the whole time besides 1 minute water breaks should've been enough reasonable doubt.
Basically convicting him because (as usual) "he didn't act right".
Also that judge gave him life without parole when he's suppose to be a professional and knew there was nothing proving him guilty.
The American justice system really sucks!
I couldn't believe they convicted him because he was a "cold fish" I thought he did great on the stand. He didn't let her rattle him.
I was shocked at the conviction as well. I really half expected the judge to override the jury and tell them that there was legally not enough evidence to convict him. Unlike the fact that he can’t make the attorney’s objections for them…. I believe he could have directed a not guilty verdict BEFORE it went to the jury. Or maybe just a directed decision to dismiss the case on grounds that the state lacked sufficient evidence. There was a disconnect on the explanation of what is real evidence and what is not evidence to the jury!
Add the fact that there were only 4 holes in her coat. The corn fork was not swung at her "multiple times".
I’m late but when I watched the trial the prosecution team seemed to be forcing lies constantly. I said then that there is no way that fake left those wounds that close together. And, he would have had to pull the rake out of her to hit her twice. That would have left more than 4 holes in her jacket. The desperation 911 calls were crazy. He never said go to hell lying whore.
This case is very interesting, I really do believe the evidence points to an accident. It bothers me that a person is in prison, when no crime was committed.
Please present your theory to proper people, which makes more sense than anything presented in court!
Thank you! That was my hope, that this would get to someone who can actually help him.
This is amazing!! Todd is innocent!! So much corruption going on in this case!!!!
@@addysbeeandgarden320you’re going to have to take it to them. They’ll never do anything from a TH-cam video. You’re going to have to press the issue in a severe way. That’s the only way.
I feel bad, this guy had horrible lawyers.
His lawyer wouldn’t go with the accident theory he wanted to.
Anybody who has worked on a farm, in a compound or hanger or anything of the sort knows it is VERY common to designate people to get equipment from other areas.
All this math talk. What if she fell on the rake in a small barn hallway and as she was pushing herself up and twisting away fell back down onto it, seems there would be more than 4 holes to me. She would not die immediately and could be crawling for help thus rolled to her stomach. The reality of being able to hit someone with a rake accurately and powerfully enough twice in succession and kill them with no bruising and defensive injuries is hard to accept for me.
What if the son did it ?
That audio recording stuff was smokescreen garbage.
The only things that could potentially condemn him are the google searches but he could have just been curious what ancient cultures used to do to cheating, unfaithful partners. It made me curious to know from seeing that search history.
If the video equipment could have been tampered with. This is the biggest problem.
I hope he gets another trial….
Yeah but she had been a habitual cheater and he had made multiple concessions to keep the family together. I'm not saying it warranted any kind of violence but the frustration level must have been pretty high. I can see him trying to catch her cheating again, especially since the surgery she was recovering from THAT day was an abortion 2/3 days before. Maybe he was searching catching a cheating wife and that suggestion came up. Algorithms offers individual interests, as in "the history of cheating wives," or any manner of other rabbit trails to keep you clicking. The guy kept the kids going to afterschool stuff and the daily weight of a family while she traveled multiple times on party cruises with all her friends. This during busy harvest times, etc. She was meeting up w the farm equipment salesmen to commit adultery in his truck while the guy made weekly visits to Mills' farm. The salesmen projected to leave his wife only after his kids were grown. She was a known cheater by his friends before they even married. She had also spent weeks away at a brother's? house planning to have a place if she divorced. Mullins seemed to make many concessions. My question was why would it be on this day when she was seemingly being more involved and a part of family for him to strike her in a rage? He sure didn't "have the time," during thus cycle of the pigs and field issue.
A farmer is NOT going to kill his wife with a huge load of piglets on their way. What was happening before the corn rake? She was very dizzy and Todd had her stop, go rest, but oh hey can you grab the pet carrier? When do people fall and have accidents? When they have dizziness! And let's say he did it. Does it make sense to send his son in to find his mom? No.
Seriously. It’s impossible to know if you poked someone with a corn rake twice, that it’s certain they’re dead. He’s not going to then mosey back over and wait for his son to find a possibly still-living witness who could attest that he stuck her.
This is a case that is heavy on my thoughts, your analysis of the wounds made me gasp because the twisting of the rake makes perfect sense. Even if she didnt pass out, she could have simply been in shock or inable to move due to the injuries to her back/near her spine. They accused him of saying "cheating wh*re" on the 9 1 1 call when I believe he was saying "1 2 3 4" while counting aloud during chest compressions. There are endless theories here but, as I'm sure you agree with, the most obvious scenario is usually the truth. Im still shocked at how far they reached for the conclusion they came to, much less that so many people agreed with it.
The defense surrendered the accident theory in opening statements, but I really feel like it is likely what really happened. But it bothers me how Todd seemed to be pretty ok about the cheating and made no strong denials during the police interview. I think he had way too much going on to plan a murder that day. The 911 stuff is just inaudible and a pretty dirty trick.
I still think of this poor man - I believe he was bamboozled by women hating men in the me too movement. I pray he’s vindicated soon!
I agree 100%. As for the Google searches, I might be searching sites like that too if my wife cheated on me all the time. I'd probably be angry at times. Doesn't mean I'd kill her. Sort of like internet venting...interventing.
Also according to their son Todd Mullis asked his wife to do what would have amounted to a halfminute job in a shed on her way back into the house. The state then said he waited until his son SOMETIME THAT MORNING went to get a drink so he could go to the shed and do the dirty deed. But he would have had to have assumed she was long gone from the shed. He did not give her a long lasting job in that shed. Does the state think she was knitting booties in the shed so she could be there when Todd got a chance to go to the shed. It's an utterly goofy conclusion that the state made, that the defence didn't catch, and that the jury fell for. God bless that man and his children.
Thank you! Seen so many docs where they completely dismissed the possibility of an accident!
I agree with you 100% as a forensic buff, nurse and a Correctional Officer he is 💯 innocent.
I never thought he was guilty. His lawyers and that town are a joke. He was the richest guy in town and they wanted what he had and they got it. That’s my opinion.
Makes alot of sense. I also thought he didnt do it.
There's no way he would have missed hitting her with the corn rake? You are hilarious..
You forgot the internet searches, him caught calling her a "whore" on the 911 call, and I guess people are to believe she ACCIDENTLY fell with such great force that she sustained fatal injuries on a corn rake. Not once but twice. An innocent man who loves his wife also doesn't smirk on the witness stand.
@@teddyjam8134, the internet searches were hers. It's pretty clear that she was the one with add, when he searched something he searched it once, she would skip from one thing to another, it's pretty common. He was doing cpr and gasping 3-4 which would sound a lot like cheating whore. He was mouth breathing, try doing 2 minutes of cpr and say anything, And yes a backwards fall from standing absolutely could cause the first cornrake injury, the second was when the cornrake rotated, he was a substantial enough man he could have pulled out the cornrake and struck her again. There wasn't a second blow, the rake rotated, her weight would've been enough for a shallow pierce through thin rib muscle. And I highly doubt he would have missed. Twice...
@@addysbeeandgarden320 Do you not know people watched that trail? Those internet searches were not hers, and his gasping for air is laughable. I heard "whore" on that 911 call. And no one with any common sense would believe that a person especially a person of her size could fall backwards with enough force for that corn rake to impale her body. Also, what about him smirking on the witness stand when the prosecutor asked him about the 911 call? No husband who loves his wife would do that. I don't know you, but if you are a person who values the truth, I think you need to take another look at everything you've said here. Not sure why some of you guys want to coddle criminals.
@@teddyjam8134If you have ever listened to the call before someone has told you oh it sounds like he is saying “cheating *****” you would more than likely hear mumbling, nothing at all, 1-2-3-4,or just 3-4. I myself didn’t hear anything but heavy breathing and muffled mumbling but then when the prosecutor says what your supposed to hear you have now fooled your mind into believing it’s their when it most likely isn’t, therefore the 911 call evidence is bogus and should not have stood for the case.
The only reason I thought he may have been guilty was the idea that there were 3 blows. This gives a plausible explanation.
If Todd wanted to kill her he could have just waited or even fed her to hogs he rushed her to hospital knowing she was alive on the way why would a killer do that ?
She injured her hands pulling down the kennel that was never pulledl down?
I agree. Also it was his body language that didn't match up with someone lying under those extreme circumstances.
People say he seems cold.
Hes lost his wife & is looking at losing his life, well freedom for the rest of it anyway. So most people would look stressed or unhappy.
I feel he looked like he was telling the truth.
Also this lady's video has a very good point which never got mentioned, which strikes me as it being an accident. The rake inpaling her twice in the same spot. Unless the 'murderer' was a professional darts player its really unlikely. But if you've fell on top of it & your trying to pull it out while you're panicking in extreme pain, there's a chance she could have fell on to it again at a different angle while part of it was still stuck in her chest.
Great presentation!!
Thank you!
@@addysbeeandgarden320 No, thank YOU!! I really hope this can help Todd.
I agree with you on one thing: it is common for people in emergency situations to drive to the hospital.
I think that youre a little too sure of yourself considering the following:
1. The kennel was never moved.
2. Where are these mysterious "wall nails"? Are we supposed to just take your word for it?
3. Downplaying her knee injuries and chalking it up to "motrin bruises" is more than a little exaggerated. You know that. Come on.
You being "100% sure" is quite a reach considering your entire basis for the two objects that set off this rake accident aren't proven at all.
Are we just supposed to take your word for it that there were random nails in walls that arent confirmed causing her to drop a kennel that wasnt moved?
Look, I would have more respect for your idea if you said "this is my theory" and not come off like this is "100%" accurate.
Lastly, Is it true you are friendly with Todd?
what do you mean by that last statement?
They now know there were only four holes in her coat. Not six.
I think this is a better theory than any other information I have heard. Thanks for taking the time to research this and post it hopefully someone will listen.
I also believed that he is innocent
I can’t believe he was convicted! Your theory makes total sense. I live out in the country and would totally start for town and call on the way.
In this country, you are guilty until proven innocent.
He is innocent!!! Always believed it! FREE TODD MULLIS
I bet you think OJ Simpson is innocent too. How about Scott Peterson? Chris Watts? All innocent too? lol
YOU FORGOT THR EVIDENCE where she just had surgery and was NOT to lift anything over 10 pounds. YET AFTER getting dizzy enough to stop cleaning lights, because she was dizzy and bleeding, Todd 'sends her to the red barn' to get a heavy pet carrier. Ask yourself why that fork was conveniently placed in there as well. The pathway was 30 inches wide. NO WAY DID SHE magically fall back on a fork. AT LEAST TWICE.
Exactly. And these folks who think he is innocent, also believe she accidently fell with such force on the corn rake that caused fatal injuries.
I watched the trial… i knew he was innocent.. you are so right.. they should’ve had you for the defendant side . So much was wrong about the whole thing… it could be anybody
Common sense and evidence show there was NO ONE else that could have done it, and evidence for sure shows this was a freak accident that she was stabbed in the back, at least TWICE, hard enough to basically go through her, get up, and fall back on it again, then and fell to her knees. All the while disturbing nothing in a 30-inch pathway. The mysterious magical corn rake, HARDLY. The worst part was he sent his 14-year-old son to find her to try and establish an alibi.
The tine injuries were straight into her body. So how was he holding this corn rake when he stabbed her? Keeping in mind the tines are at a 90 degree angle. What really seems more likely here?
You are basing your theory on way too many assumptions. Just my opinion.
The kennel was never moved. It still had dust on it . So you're wrong about the wounds. And you must be Todd's friend if I'm not mistaken . And you're saying you know more than the medical examiner right ?
your making assumptions based on 0 facts just like the prosecution. lol how egregious
Wow people are full of shi* here
Shes a paramedic seen more than some I would say. And medical examiner's are wrong all the time.
I guess we are just supposed to take her word for it that there were random nails in walls that arent confirmed causing her to drop a kennel that wasnt moved. She's a paramedic who apparently is an expert in forensic analysis without having ever been to the scene and changing the evidnece to fit her theory.
Normally, this would be okay under a title like "my theory" not "100% innocent" that's just too bold considering.
Wait she IS FRIENDS with him? Oh boy.
Makes totally sense what your sayimg. Todd is innocent
You assume she is on a medication that caused those horrific injuries? 😂😂😂
Well she just had a op so yea people are normally given given post op meds.
she's only talking about the knees bruising
wow , very impressed. The defense seemed bad.. What's your opinion of his representation?
Hot garbage, I could have done a better job of defending him! Imo, I would have never allowed the prosecution to say what they thought he was saying on the 911 tape. I didn't get into it on the video, but after carrying her to the car, and then doing cpr, there's no way he was saying sentances. He was making the noise of someone who was winded pushing air out of his lungs in order to get a bigger breath the next time. It's called a mondegreen, and it shouldn't have been allowed, period. There are several tiktok videos proving this. I think he was trying to count coupled with the "ch" sound that an athlete makes. Have you ever seen the "Friends" episode where Rachel runs and she's going ch ch ch with every breath? It's a valid way to ensure proper oxygenation. At the beginning he was saying one, two, one two; eventually it switched to three, four, three, four, which could sound like cheating whore when coupled with the ch sound. There's a lot of things I would have rebutted like the weight of the kennel. Weight is subjective. He's a big farmer, strong, he didn't think the kennel was that heavy, he was likely the person who put it up, to him, it wasn't that heavy, it was no big deal, he probably swung it up into position single handed. My husband can carry one in each hand no problem. I can only carry 1, in the front but he doesn't think about that when he asks me to grab them because to him it was no big deal to carry them around.
But how do you know there were nails? Are you just assuming there was?
Why don’t you watch the trial? You have a silly string of odd comments, no proof
I'm sorry but you guys have no idea what ur talking about I mean come on really all the evidence points right at him the Google searches the affair and he absolutely was not gonna give her half his stuff especially her having an affair I mean seriously feel sorry for him all u want but he's guilty and gonna spend the rest of his miserable life in prison!!
Did you get permission to show these autopsy photographs?
Public record
Lol what they’re online calm down
All wounds on her back were caused by the rake. There were no nail injuries. She never reached the pet carrier. You got some of it right, but this isn't proof that he's innocent. I think he's innocent, but this isn't the proof.
No they weren't, like I said, wounds c And d were too small and too close together to be caused by the corn rake. There was also only 2 wounds for that set of injuries, not 4. It couldn't have been the corn rake. And just because the kennel was still on the shelf doesn't mean she didn't try to pick it up.
@@addysbeeandgarden320 We know all wounds were caused by the fork. It's empirical, proven by the fact that her coat only had 4 holes. You should read the post conviction relief documents. They will help understand exactly what happened. Specifically the biomechanical engineer report.
I tend to agree that the two smaller punctures couldn’t have been from the rake. I believe there was discussion that they were caused at the hospital? Regardless, I agree that the circumference and spacing of those smaller wounds eliminate the rake from making them. The fact that her coat had only 4 punctures eliminates the possibility that anyone at all was wielding that rake. In order to strike a second time it would have to be pulled free from her coat in order to swing it again. Period. Such ineptitude was demonstrated in this whole farce of an investigation and trial! Thank you for taking the time and trouble to make this video. I believe your theory comes a lot closer to the truth than the coroner’s!
I agree, I always believed he was innocent too. Personally, I think if somebody did murder Amy, it may have been her lover's wife who knew about it. If she wasn't murdered, and I remember hearing during that trial that she was feeling really dizzy while she was cleaning, and it is very possible she could have climbed up on something and just fell backwards onto the rake. I think her husband should definitely appeal this case. This so sad for her husband and for her children too.
YOU CANNOT explain away the fact she just had surgery and the idiot asked her to go lift and get a pet carrier that THEY LIKELY HADN'T USED IN YEARS. COMMON SENSE. Ad this was after she already said she was dizzy and bleeding earlier. NO WAY. I believe he was a control freak, she was his farm slave and he exploded over the affair.
There's no evidence at all that he exploded. He had already forgiven 1 affair, and probably was trying to pretend the second didn't happen. He went and picked her up and took care of her for several days after the surgery. Her family lived close by and her mom wasn't there to pick her up or help out? You couldn't keep my mom away after surgery, she would have been right there at the center waiting with my husband, cleaning my house afterwards, taking care of the kids, bowing to my every whim, but she wasn't. Her surgery was likely something quick, and simple like a tubal or an ablation or both and no one thought it was a big deal, including her. He didn't ask for her help, she came out and asked to help. Weight is absolutely subjective, this was a big strong farmer. There's a difference between gym strong and farm boy strong, and that guy was farm boy strong. In his brain, that kennel weighed nothing, and he was giving her an easy chore that didn't require her to stand on a bucket, and was a lot closer to the house AND he didn't ask her to bring it back, he asked her to put it outside the building it was in. She could have also said "no I think that kennel is too heavy", or "I didn't feel good enough to get the kennel, I'm going to go lay down", but she agreed. She's got plenty of patient advocate experience, she fights dumb doctors for a living. Furthermore, medical people are the worst most non-compliant patients on the face of the planet (ask me how I know). She knew what she was supposed to do after the surgery, she could have reread the discharge instructions and stayed her ass in bed, but she didn't. He didn't ask for her help, she went out looking for work.
You mentioned yourself that she just had surgery and was dizzy. Occam's Razor.
@@addysbeeandgarden320
First off, nothing you offered was "proof". Also, must be fun to make up your own evidence.
You're literally making up scenarios out of thin air and calling them "proof"
So now her wounds are from nails in the wall?? And where exactly is your proof that there were nails in the wall?
You do realize that it was 25°F that day, right? It was a cold, chilly November day and she was wearing a thick coat. No way with all those layers on is she going to get scratched by backing into nails lol.
Secondly, it's impossible that she accidentally fell with enough force to puncture her internal organs, not once, but twice. Sorry, the only way that force is possible is by someone swinging it at her.
Another thing, the coroner never said Amy was definitively hit with the rake 3 times. She said 2 times, and possibly 3.
Also, are we supposed to ignore all the rest of the evidence? The internet searches. Amy's own words where she's telling people "if anything happens to me", telling others possible places she might be found if she went missing.
@@addysbeeandgarden320
He had already exploded, or was about to.
His internet searches, for one, tell a very different story than the one you're claiming. You can tell by the things he looked up, that he was secretly seething.
Secondly, Amy said herself on the very day it happened, that things were very tense. She also made it very clear that she feared him and feared for her life
Lastly, he had not forgiven the first affair. Because if he had, he wouldn't have had her on such a short leash and had her reporting to him every time she went somewhere and timing her each time she left the house.
Listen to the trial. Twisting evidence to make a TH-cam video means NOTHING!!!. Her version of the second strike??? Laughable. EAsily explained by victim moving after the first strike.