Trust These Three Translations!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 6K

  • @MatthewEverhard
    @MatthewEverhard  2 ปีที่แล้ว +221

    Hey everyone, I would be very honored if you would please check out my new book Souls: How Jesus Saves Sinners - amzn.to/3A31Bgb

    • @edbeckerich3737
      @edbeckerich3737 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The pre-orders are shipping, mine has come in. My favorite translation is the one God uses in my life

    • @Praise___YaH
      @Praise___YaH 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Guys, HERE is The Savior
      YaH The Heavenly FATHER HIMSELF was Who they Crucified/Pierced for our sins and “HERE IS THE PROOF”
      From the Ancient Egyptian Semitic:
      "Yad He Vav He" is what Moshe (Moses) wrote, when Moses asked YaH His Name (Exodus 3)
      Ancient Egyptian Semitic Direct Translation
      Yad - "Behold The Hand"
      He - "Behold the Breath"
      Vav - "Behold The NAIL"

    • @PastorJeremyCollins
      @PastorJeremyCollins 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Excited to dig into it. 👍🏻

    • @nicholasgeorge7825
      @nicholasgeorge7825 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Shameless self promotion. Go bro.

    • @imafeltersnatch7634
      @imafeltersnatch7634 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I rather get your book. Historical accuracy for Jesus. Apparently this book is impossible due to lack of evidence. Go figure

  • @billkunert7281
    @billkunert7281 ปีที่แล้ว +557

    I found the KJV a bit hard to understand prior to being saved. Since then it is much easier to understand. I got saved in 1977 and started reading the Bible every day. I've read the Bible through every year for at least 30 years and it's very comfortable and understandable. I really believe the Holy Spirit gives understanding.

    • @InterdimensionalCabal
      @InterdimensionalCabal ปีที่แล้ว +6

      what does it mean to be saved?

    • @helgapenzhorn796
      @helgapenzhorn796 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      ​@@InterdimensionalCabalto be saved is to repent from your sins and to believe in Jesus Christ as your Saviour and Lord. Then you have been saved from your sins and from satan and hell. Jesus says: He who believes in Me has eternal life which means he will live forever in the delightful presence of God. When we are saved God makes us new. We are born-again.

    • @bridonbutcher8845
      @bridonbutcher8845 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@helgapenzhorn796 Acts 2:38-39,46-47 KJV
      Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. **[39] For the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, even as many as the Lord our God shall call.** [46] And they, continuing daily with one accord in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house, did eat their meat with gladness and singleness of heart, [47] Praising God, and having favour with all the people. And the Lord added to the church daily **such as should be saved.**
      the plan of salvation hasn't changed, it is only through repentance and baptism in Jesus Christ name.

    • @Rev22-21
      @Rev22-21 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      You might recall in 1 Corinthians it mentions that the word of God is spiritually discerned and it is the Holy Spirit that helps us understand it. 😊

    • @soybeanzzzz
      @soybeanzzzz ปีที่แล้ว

      @@InterdimensionalCabal 1 John 1:9 KJV
      If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. You see, Jesus Christ is the only one who has the credentials to meet God's requirement that we must be perfect, or that a perfect man die in our place, in order to live with God and actually "do life' with God for eternity. Salvation is truly a gift from God. Even the faith to believe in Him is a gift from God, lest anyone should boast about the good decision they made.
      Just asking the question: "What does it mean to be saved?" is an indication that God is presently working on your heart; preparing it for salvation. And I hope that is a wonderful comfort to you.
      And how is it that Jesus Christ is qualified? How is it that he meets the stringent requirements set forth by God?
      Well, first off, the Bible says that the sins of the fathers are passed on from generation to generation through the (earhtly) father. So the original sin from Adam and Eve forward is passed on through the man.
      And since no man can be perfect, God himself condescended himself to somehow miraculously be the seed that impregnated Mary(a virgin with a pure heart) so that she could give birth to a sinless man, Jesus Christ.
      So Jesus Christ was fully man while remaining fully God when he died on the cross to pay for the sins of those who believe that he died a substitutionary death for those of us who believe in Him.
      Romans 10:9 declares: That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.

  • @richardlively1666
    @richardlively1666 ปีที่แล้ว +144

    Whats important is not just reading it, but living it....dare I say a harder but more rewarding task

    • @BMEULTRAMAGA24
      @BMEULTRAMAGA24 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Well said 🙂

    • @vainot4u
      @vainot4u 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Wow! Such power in that short statement!!

    • @8thMusketeer
      @8thMusketeer 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What's with the 666 in your name?

    • @richardlively1666
      @richardlively1666 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@8thMusketeer I dont know you tube just assigned it to me... BUT I DONT LIKE IT

    • @8thMusketeer
      @8thMusketeer 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@richardlively1666
      Weird. It won't go away? Even if you change you're username?

  • @CruxSacraApologetics
    @CruxSacraApologetics ปีที่แล้ว +1065

    0:00 Introduction
    1:49 Credentials
    5:48 Translation #1
    9:51 Translation #2
    13:39 Translation #3
    16:06 Other Translations
    20:34 Closing Remarks

  • @lmsiv5829
    @lmsiv5829 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +194

    1. King James Version
    2. New King James Version
    3. English Standard Version

    • @Yeshua_Ha_Mashiac
      @Yeshua_Ha_Mashiac 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Below, are some of the verses I've discovered are deleted / missing from ESV and NIV. Side note: A "real" modernization of the KJV is the MEV. Modern English Version. That doesn't have the below verses deleted.
      "Philip said, “If you believe with all your heart, you may.” He answered, “I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.”
      Acts 8:37 MEV
      "in whom we have redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins:"
      Colossians 1:14 MEV
      "But this kind does not go out except by prayer and fasting.”
      Matthew 17:21 MEV
      Altered:
      "Study to show yourself approved by God, a workman who need not be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth."
      2 Timothy 2:15 MEV

    • @zakstarkiller1850
      @zakstarkiller1850 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      @@Yeshua_Ha_MashiacPlease learn more about Bible scholarship before you speak on this matter. The KJV is not the only correct Bible

    • @jovannyrivera1506
      @jovannyrivera1506 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@Yeshua_Ha_MashiacNKJV have them all what you talking about bro

    • @carolbattle8010
      @carolbattle8010 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      thanks

    • @SR-iy4gg
      @SR-iy4gg 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      The KJV is notorious for having translation errors.

  • @sharonshoop495
    @sharonshoop495 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1476

    For me as an 81 year old widow, I memorized so much as a child and adult from the KJV. I read from the others but I go back to the KJV so as not to mess up my memorization.!!!!!!

    • @glennpesti6519
      @glennpesti6519 2 ปีที่แล้ว +48

      Same here

    • @scottsprowl7484
      @scottsprowl7484 2 ปีที่แล้ว +101

      KJV all the way for me too. Too many changes in other versions

    • @deanarjones9114
      @deanarjones9114 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      Me too

    • @nicholasgeorge7825
      @nicholasgeorge7825 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Me too, and then I go back to it, and find out what's in my head isn't really King James, but something close.

    • @daveneh8047
      @daveneh8047 2 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      KJV is the WORST.

  • @SusanRichardsDay
    @SusanRichardsDay ปีที่แล้ว +203

    I got born again reading King James . Holy Spirit is our teacher and leads us into all truth .

    • @joshuacrosby8176
      @joshuacrosby8176 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      It was the HS that convicted and converted you, not the particular translation you were holding when He did it.

    • @SusanRichardsDay
      @SusanRichardsDay ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@joshuacrosby8176 I agree , just kinda amazing how God makes His Word alive in us and Holy Spirit interprets it for our soul.

    • @oshea2300
      @oshea2300 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@joshuacrosby8176 those modern perversions are not quick powerful and sharper than any two-edged sword. Their butter knives and they're dead. Yes you can get saved reading one, but they have no power.

    • @chevyyyyyyy
      @chevyyyyyyy 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You know that KJ was gay, right?

    • @therookiefisherman5234
      @therookiefisherman5234 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Who was king James and why is there a bible with the name of a king?

  • @sk-un5jq
    @sk-un5jq ปีที่แล้ว +143

    Psalms and the Gospel of John are incredible in KJV. Nothing else comes close to the majesty, beauty, and power for those two books.

    • @lymphomasurvive
      @lymphomasurvive ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Douay-Rheims

    • @STROND
      @STROND ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Apart from the fact that it REMOVES Gods name from nearly all the places where it was in the first place !

    • @nigelmcculloch3746
      @nigelmcculloch3746 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes, very true, and it uses a language not in use today, Jesus never spoke like that, and he used God's name Jehovah when quoting scripture

    • @slightlyopinionated8107
      @slightlyopinionated8107 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      No Hebrew speaker uses Yahweh or Jehovah when they read the text. Yahweh is the Tetragrammaton of the name of God which has been lost because they never said it.

    • @nigelmcculloch3746
      @nigelmcculloch3746 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@slightlyopinionated8107 it's good that you recognize that the name Jehovah is referring to God, but before we launch into a debate remember that the name Jesus is accepted as meaning God's son even though most people know that his disciples never called him that, even the name yeshua would of been pronounced differently then than what we would say it. Do you think the ancient nation of Israel could be trusted to preserve God's name after having his son put to death?

  • @edwardgerdemann2400
    @edwardgerdemann2400 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    My two recommendations are the NKJV and the ESV. I think the NKJV is best for the Old Testament while the ESV is my choice for New Testament. For my "old" translation I prefer the 1599 Geneva Bible. If you want to get a KJV, get a 1611 edition, especially if it has both prefaces, the first to the king and the second to the readers. It throws cold water on a lot of the KJV only arguments.

  • @tmactable
    @tmactable ปีที่แล้ว +412

    The best Bible is the one you’re reading and studying every day.

    • @jamesbarksdale978
      @jamesbarksdale978 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Amen! As long as it falls within Orthodox Christianity. There are some heretical versions out there that intentionally skew the Christian Faith.

    • @tuvoca825
      @tuvoca825 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Except for the CCP revision.
      It's a blatant and willful corruption.
      Very disturbing... and entertaining to people who know better. What a shameful corruption! Communist leadership should never be in charge of any church ever. They can't seem not to corrupt it.

    • @ubyy1
      @ubyy1 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      if it is real and accurate....most are not. Remember Satan is The Great Deceiver. Remember what Satan did in the Garden of Eden? He took God's word and he twisted it. And he caused man to fall into sin. Satan has not changed his tactics at all. He's a liar and a Deceiver there is no truth in him. Not all bibles are translated from the same text. One text came out of any of the church at Antioch. Mini Bibles of translated from a text that came from Alexandria Egypt. Egypt was a picture of sin and worldliness through the Bible. God had Moses lead his people out of Egypt. Satan is trying to lead people back into Egypt.
      Search your Bible for the words Morningstar. Find out Who each of those verses are talking about. Some of them were talking about Satan and later on they're talking about Jesus Christ. You have a fake Bible.
      The first John 5:7 about the Holy Trinity. God the Father God the word / son, and God the Holy Spirit. You have a fake Bible.

    • @ronwilliams329
      @ronwilliams329 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      @@sqearly That reasoning does work when one uses the New World Translation :)

    • @seanobrien2306
      @seanobrien2306 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ronwilliams329 Hi, Everyone..., A ( CULT ) Bible, known as the Jehovah's Witnesses, and their own writing titled: "New World Translation". * It is ( NOT ) a real Holy Bible and many scriptures have been altered or changed and or omitted. * Please..., stay away from this dangerous ( CULT ) and you won't be hurt by their many punishments' and rules and regulations. Sincerely in Christ.., "Semper Fi" Mike in Montana :)

  • @caleb5498
    @caleb5498 ปีที่แล้ว +137

    I just started reading NLT I’m new Christian I have found god

    • @ubyy1
      @ubyy1 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Okay number one.... He was educated by fools, graduates an educated fool.
      If you're learning from someone who doesn't know what they're talking about they're going to pollute your brain.
      Number two, not all bibles are translated from the same text. There is a text that comes out of Alexandria Egypt, and one that came out of the church of antioch.
      If you want to find out if your Bible is a fake.... Find it online and do a search for morning star.
      Read all of those verses and tell me who each one is talking about.... God is not the author of confusion.... Jesus Christ and Satan are not the same....
      Go to First John 5:7.... Is your Bible talking about the Holy trinity of God? Or is it talking about some blood water and whatever. Does Bible teaches Christ is God and that he created all things? If not you have a Fake Bible regardless of how or who you learn to translate from.
      If you want to learn god's real word all you need is God's real word and the Holy Spirit of God to teach you.

    • @tracyannpardue1530
      @tracyannpardue1530 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Welcome! Welcome! I myself can find the Bible overwhelming. Like it takes time.

    • @frugal9065
      @frugal9065 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The bible is a collection of stories its not actually true

    • @mikeortiz9664
      @mikeortiz9664 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@frugal9065listen to your self

    • @angeldotel5786
      @angeldotel5786 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@frugal9065you’ll find out sooner than later that it is :)

  • @monstertruckfan8450
    @monstertruckfan8450 ปีที่แล้ว +303

    The NKJV is the only one that I've found that capitalizes He, Him, His, etc. which I find very respectful.

    • @dank4254
      @dank4254 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

      NASB does, too

    • @Peaches-ym9ws
      @Peaches-ym9ws 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Provides clarity, too, when the passage is of the "he said / He said" type.

    • @edcarson3113
      @edcarson3113 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      And you lose out on dual applications of the verse.
      The King James Holy Bible has it right.

    • @sk-un5jq
      @sk-un5jq 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I like that too. There are newer KJV versions that do it as well.

    • @Lost_n_Found_1
      @Lost_n_Found_1 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@edcarson3113 No, it doesn't.

  • @Jesusismyonething
    @Jesusismyonething 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    I grew up KJV and started memorizing with that translation as a child. Now, at 60+, my go to translations are NKJV & ESV. I tried to love the NASB but keep coming back to my tried and true.
    Every year I switch to a different version for my annual reading plan and this year is the NIVUK. It’s refreshing but I can’t wait to get back to my NKJV.

  • @CornerTalker
    @CornerTalker 2 ปีที่แล้ว +501

    0:00 Intro Material
    1:50 Credentials
    5:25 The Three
    16:07 Other Good Choices

    • @chickensauce85
      @chickensauce85 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      thank you so much

    • @fredmcmurray6308
      @fredmcmurray6308 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      thanks for doing this

    • @bartleby1807
      @bartleby1807 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Very helpfull. Thanks.

    • @danniequesenberry9951
      @danniequesenberry9951 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Well buddy l like how discuss the choices of different bible's.........up front with everybody and to me you got it exactly right when brought out the choice of the King James Bible........ to me that is the one and only Holy Bible......... for my opinion we don't any updated Bible and we don't need any add on Bible or book's or literature of any kind.,........ the King James Bible has all the information all True and all the Truth that any and everybody needs to get saved and to stay saved and to me that's the main purpose of having the Bible to begin with.........

    • @danniequesenberry9951
      @danniequesenberry9951 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      And further more my Bible ........The King James Bible tells about what could happen to you if you add to or take away from the words of this book......and believe me God is not talking about a walk in the park........or not getting a cocoa cola and chocolate cake.........God is very serious.......... people go to messing around with The Holy Bible.........King James.........lt could cause a lot of souls to go to hell........in my opinion.........ln my opinion .......lm proned to believe that a lot of people in this world just want to change things in this world.......l don't believe that everything in this world needs changing......lf you change everything in this world then l believe that you take away the stability of and from this world.........

  • @bear-headstudios1212
    @bear-headstudios1212 2 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    I was gifted a KJV Bible from the 1920s , I just love reading it.

  • @complexsimple7273
    @complexsimple7273 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    It has been said that the New King James translation is the 'bridge translation' facilitating change in more modern translations. An interesting study into this is a book by David Daniels called 'Look What's Missing'. Translations are compared and you can clearly see how our scriptures are being changed. Some would argue that this is in part to meld world religions into a one world religion which is coming as we know by the book of Revelation and chapter 17.
    Whoa to those changing God's word.
    Revelation 22:18-19 says:
    18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:
    19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.
    In the words of Mr. T, "I pity the fool."

    • @bigtobacco1098
      @bigtobacco1098 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

      If you take the kjv as the standard...

  • @marcusburnettsr8911
    @marcusburnettsr8911 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +46

    I had hard time with KJV coming to christianity late in life. So I came across the NASB and truly like it. Since then the NKJV was released so I’ve been using it. These are my 3!

    • @teresafarrell6457
      @teresafarrell6457 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Agree on the NASB! Great stuff. 👍 I was brought up on KJV, so that's the only reason I enjoy it and I keep a Webster's Collegiate handy too. 😄

    • @cryptojihadi265
      @cryptojihadi265 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      The NASB is the most literal translation and the most Christian vs Secular translation.

    • @greatbriton8425
      @greatbriton8425 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The NASB is based on the corrupted Critical Text, see "THE WORDS OF GOD: KJB or Modern Bibles?" The King James Version 1769 is God's ordained translation, his perfect word, preserved for us today. See "Irrefutable Proof in 60 min: The KJB Superseded Hebrew and Greek" and many others from Truth is Christ

    • @umarae27
      @umarae27 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I like the 1995 a lot.

    • @marcusburnettsr8911
      @marcusburnettsr8911 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@umarae27 Got the 2020 recently. Still adapting.

  • @DianeBianchi_MnWx
    @DianeBianchi_MnWx ปีที่แล้ว +95

    I love my KJV. There are times when I pull out the NKJV to read, but within a couple of chapters I go back to the KJV, for the beauty and movement and the three-dimensional feeling I get from the sentence structure, if that makes sense.

    • @deniss2623
      @deniss2623 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Interestingly described, Diane!

    • @michaelsburger665
      @michaelsburger665 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why in the world would these 2 bibles call Jesus as God's servant, this is wrong, so you do not know about this????
      we as Christians know that Jesus is the Son of God, can anyone deny this fact, no, Jesus is God's Son, now you call out the NKJB precise translation,
      sorry you are wrong then why do the NKJB and the NIV state the following they are both corrupt
      NKJB
      Acts 3:13 The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, the God of our fathers, glorified His Servant Jesus, whom you delivered up and denied in the presence of Pilate, when he was determined to let Him go.
      Acts 3:26 To you first, God, having raised up His Servant Jesus, sent Him to bless you, in turning away every one of you from your iniquities."
      NIV
      Acts 3:13 The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, the God of our fathers, has glorified his servant Jesus. You handed him over to be killed, and you disowned him before Pilate, though he had decided to let him go.
      Acts 3:26 When God raised up his servant, he sent him first to you to bless you by turning each of you from your wicked ways.”

    • @Daegdon
      @Daegdon ปีที่แล้ว +7

      KJV is a very deep experience which connects with my soul most profoundly.

  • @Gospelmama1940
    @Gospelmama1940 ปีที่แล้ว +68

    I am not Reformed nor Presbyterian (Southern Baptist born and bred1) but I really enjoy your videos! I have so many different translations and a few paraphases but I didn't know there was anything other than KJV until probably 10 years after I was born again. And I find that I feel so "at home" with my KJV and the NKJ helps me with places that are not so easily processed these days. Thank you for being God's faithful servant!

    • @marcovau4902
      @marcovau4902 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well you can be Southern Baptist and kind of Reformed, just like Albert Mohler, f.e. I highly appriciate him.

    • @Foggybottom45543
      @Foggybottom45543 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Are you still SBA?

    • @AmyC-o3p
      @AmyC-o3p 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you Pastor Matthew, those are my translations too!I memorized the Psalms from KJV, beautiful flow and understanding!!! Praise The Lord Jesus Christ 🙏

    • @houseceo2426
      @houseceo2426 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I've spent time as a Southern Baptist and as an Independent Baptist....Struggle in understanding the KJV

  • @RonaldJohnson-zr8vh
    @RonaldJohnson-zr8vh ปีที่แล้ว +23

    I appreciate your comments on this. People often need a simple approach.
    I did take a couple semesters of Biblical Hebrew. Certainly not nearly enough,
    but it did give me a great appreciation for the challenge translators face. My
    normal reading version is NASB - I have become accustomed to reading the
    portions that use the "thee-s and thou-s" instead as modernized words. I use
    the Key Word Study Bible because it contains Hebrew and Greek dictionaries.
    What I recommend for others - who will not be studying Hebrew and Greek, is
    this ...
    Fundamentally, recognize there is a big difference between READING the Bible
    and STUDYING the Bible. Bible STUDY will get us blessing after blessing. But
    even for serious Bible students, we should not forget we all need at times to put
    the study versions and tools down and just pick up the Bible and READ and
    READ and READ. You will fall in love with reading the Bible and NOT want to
    stop!
    For reading - find a mainline version that is readable for you. Sounds simplistic,
    but it is truly important. So the version for reading is not so technically important
    as it may be for studying.
    Now, for studying, My advice is different.
    FIRST, start with an interlinear seriously!. I know of one available free online:
    Interlinear Scripture Analyzer from Scripture4all.org is freely downloadable. They
    tell you what original sources they use. But I find the greatest benefit to me is it
    makes me very aware of words in the original language. You get to see how the
    syntax and grammar is very different from English. Sometimes the words are
    similar enough the meaning is recognizable to me as an English speaker. But
    keep at it and you will come across some verses where you will shake your
    head and be very thankful there were translators to turn it into readable English.
    Hopefully you will join me is thinking that bickering over the ENGLISH words is
    futile. Then consider the element of copyright restrictions. There is a limit to how
    many English words can be used in the same order before a publishing house
    would be guilty of plagiarism.
    SECOND, compare the translations of several versions. Use
    BibleGateway.com's parallel function. Since there is no perfect "Word for word"
    translation of Biblical Hebrew or Biblical Greek into English, by comparing
    many, we are more likely to be exposed to the alternate shades of meaning
    these languages contain. Revealing alternate shades of meaning was a goal of
    "The Amplified Bible". And it is a worthy alternate to consider. Try it in
    BibleGateway.com to see how your favorite passages would look.
    THIRD, for Old Testament passages, be sure to also consider the Septuagint
    (LXX). The Septuagint is a Greek version of the Hebrew Scriptures which was
    translated a few hundred years before Jesus. As a new believer (a long time
    ago) when I saw the OT being quoted by NT authors, I would look up the cross-
    referenced OT passage and read it in the OT. But many times there were
    significant differences between the OT passage and the NT quote. For
    example, look at Acts 2:25-28 and compare to Psalms 16:18-11. OK, they are
    quite similar, but why the differences? NT Authors were usually already writing in
    Greek. So the OT they used was not the Hebrew Scriptures, but the LXX.
    FOURTH, Our brains absorb information differently when we READ versus
    when we HEAR. I had the Bible on CD for listening as I drove. There were times
    I would HEAR something that I felt was different from what I was familiar to
    having READ. Later when I would look up the passage to read it I would see the
    audio recording was accurate after all. So there is a benefit to listening to the
    Bible in the car AS WELL AS reading our Bibles.
    FIFTH, Regardless of which version we choose, the most important thing of all is
    to Read and Read and to keep Reading!

    • @brendamoore1190
      @brendamoore1190 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @RonaldJohnson-zr8vh: “Read, read, and keep reading” is key! Your notes are interesting and helpful. Thx!

    • @World_So_Cold
      @World_So_Cold ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you very much!

    • @MyPhilemon6site
      @MyPhilemon6site 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      KJV vs ESV
      A simple test on how a translation treats the deity of Jesus Christ….
      1 Timothy 3:16
      ESV- “Great indeed, we confess, is the mystery of godliness:
      He was manifested in the flesh,
      vindicated by the Spirit,
      seen by angels,
      proclaimed among the nations,
      believed on in the world,
      taken up in glory.”
      KJV- “And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory. “
      Notice the ESV and may I add NASB, NIV, New World Translation (JW’s Bible)
      Omitted “God” for “He”!
      “He” could be anyone , me, you, or anyone else! (Example: I was manifested in the flesh when I came into this world; I was vindicated in the spirit when I was born again; I am seen of angels then and now, etc)
      The King James Version specifically states that Jesus is God!
      Now the “Spirit of truth” would not testify otherwise!

    • @user-lf4kf9oh4s
      @user-lf4kf9oh4s 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Great post in addition to the video, thanks! I agree listening to the Bible and reading it are quite different experiences! I often listen to a version on Audible as I have young children and don’t have much peace to sit down and read. It has been a God-send 😁🙏

    • @GrahamL-v8d
      @GrahamL-v8d 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Acts 2:25-28 quotes Psalm 16:8-11 (18-11 is simply a typo)

  • @DeanDiefendorf
    @DeanDiefendorf 15 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    New believer. My go to is the NLT.

  • @mattblackburn3791
    @mattblackburn3791 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Thank you for this enlightening video. I have grown up reading mostly the NKJV, NIV, and NRSV, but have found the KJV and ESV later in life and enjoy them both for different reasons. I did what you said and just read Psalm 90 from the King James out loud, slowly, and meditatively. I am 11 days away from the one year anniversary of my mother's death at the age of 78 and the threescore and 10 and fourscore verse really teared me up. As someone who has struggled with the church for the past 5 years or so but still remaining faithful in private devotion, I really needed that reminder from our Lord in Psalm 90 about using my time here on Earth wisely. God's peace my brother in Christ.

    • @helenakinnunen3070
      @helenakinnunen3070 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Try Complete jewish Boble

    • @carolynenochs9139
      @carolynenochs9139 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I am sorry for your loss. I do have a question about the ESV. It is one I was considering for my study Bible. What do you like about it that translation and what makes it different than the rest.

    • @c0rndog748
      @c0rndog748 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@carolynenochs9139I have the ESV thinline and ESV study heirloom Bible from crossway, the Esv is very very good since its word for word translation. That makes it true to original text, and makes it great for study material as it’s more text book like than poetry like as some other thought for thought translations or the KJV for instance. (Those bibles are still great, just harder to use and understand from a study point of view)

  • @jenniferwoodville2552
    @jenniferwoodville2552 ปีที่แล้ว +206

    It's aways been funny to me when people say the KJV is too hard to read/understand. I can remember being four years old, sitting in my dad's lap as he taught me to read using the KJV. It's been my bible for 39 years and continually amazes me with the beauty and simplicity with which is was written. I'd encourage anyone to give it a chance. You'll be surprised at how easy it is to read.

    • @eclipsesonic
      @eclipsesonic ปีที่แล้ว +31

      I love and grew up with the KJV like you did, but I totally get where people are coming from when they say that it's not the easiest to understand. It's not just the thee's, thou's and thine's (which would throw anyone off, who's not familiar with Shakespearean English), but also the occasional sentence structure, the archaic words and the false friends present (words that we still use today, but they have a completely different meaning than what they had back in 1611).

    • @grantsmythe8625
      @grantsmythe8625 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@eclipsesonic Agreed. I also grew up with the KJV but prefer the RSV or NRSV but to each their own.

    • @Dwayneff
      @Dwayneff ปีที่แล้ว +8

      the only issue I have with the KJV is that some words had a different meaning back in 1611. For example Hebrew 4 verse 12: For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any two edge sword, piercing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of thoughts and intents of the heart. Now, I thought quick meant fast, but doing research it actually means alive. Which is why I was thinking for buying the NIV version but found some very interesting information that made me second guess it so I'm looking to buy a New King James Version with updated english language.

    • @VRcation
      @VRcation ปีที่แล้ว +6

      It’s also inaccurate and has opened the door for things like Calvinism to exist for augments 1 Corinthians 1:18 from “being saved” to “been saved”
      Also in John 1:18, changes the word God to Son. Without context, crazy to not call Jesus God when it literally does in the original Greek.
      Craziest example is 1 Corinthians 1:18 though which now opens the debate of “can you lose your salvation?” The verse literally says “being saved” meaning that you that salvation in a verb not an adjective.
      - someone who went to a KJV only college and absolutely destroyed professors. I can’t tell you how many times my questions in class were answered with just “ask me about that after class”

    • @SuperKvlogs
      @SuperKvlogs ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Easy to read, but doesn’t mean it’s easy to understand and comprehend.

  • @felipessunshine
    @felipessunshine ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Love the ESV!

  • @Burnell_jr
    @Burnell_jr หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I’ve been in love with the (HCSB) for years. I’m a pastors son so I grew up on the KJV. But it doesn’t flow naturally in its language as it’s old English. Today I bought the ESV study bible and I think it’s much easier to understand and that’s important amongst us millennials. I believe God is speaking to us in a today’s voice. I say all that to say we should all find a bible that we’re comfortable with reading and studying. The Bible helps to connect our faith to heaven.

  • @jameswallace-ls2fc
    @jameswallace-ls2fc ปีที่แล้ว +22

    December 2021, my wife I decided we needed to strengthen our weak Bible knowledge. We read Bible in a year, every day in 2022. It was the NIV, which while glad we read it, wasn’t what we were looking for. This year we are both reading Bible in a year NKJV. Love it. My hunger for more word grew ferocious last fall & I bought a nice KJV, had never spent extensive time in it, it’s amazing. In January I added David Nortons New Cambridge Paragraph Bible. Love them both. Using the Bible in a year format I felt the room for one more a day; earlier this month I added my 2001 ESV. I was pleasantly surprised when I watched your video by the triangle. My wife added an NASB 95, I might add an NASB 77 to my mix. When I die I want to go to Heaven with a solid grasp on The Word. God bless you.

    • @rebeccaherron3789
      @rebeccaherron3789 ปีที่แล้ว

      I use all three also. I am slow, lol, repetition helps so much.. Thank you for your input.

  • @robertmcvicar5824
    @robertmcvicar5824 ปีที่แล้ว +60

    Christian for 40years and am a King Jimmy man. It's slows us down when we read it. We have to think about what we're reading also when we quote it most will know it's the bible. Also displays the glorious doctrines of grace crystal clear.

    • @Hyvelez
      @Hyvelez ปีที่แล้ว +6

      King Jimmy man. Love it XD

    • @robertmcvicar5824
      @robertmcvicar5824 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      KJ it's magnificent Ptl.

    • @Aaron-hype
      @Aaron-hype ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I’ve heard from the Lord so much in the KJV. The Amplified original (classic) explains what the meaning behind what the KJV describes in single words. I.e. “love.” What kind of love? Agape? Romantic? Brotherly? “ Peter, do you ‘love’ me?” That word the KJV and NKJV as “love,” isn’t the same in all three occurrences, as they would portrait. The Greek proves this. “The third time, He uses “phileō,” whereas the first two, “agape.” Both King James will NEVER open your eyes to this.
      Amplified is a good version that gives the context where single word usages fail.
      Be blessed saints. 🙏

    • @robertmcvicar5824
      @robertmcvicar5824 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Aaron-hype Hi Aaron that was interesting what you said and will take it on board and I knew about the different kinds of love in the Greek. I'm not against other versions but I'll always be a mainly a king Jimmy man. I love God's word it's my daily bread. God bless

    • @Aaron-hype
      @Aaron-hype ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@robertmcvicar5824 funny thing about bread when Jesus is tempted in the wilderness, and quotes the OT where “Man my not live by bread alone, but by every word of God.” Many think this “word” He mentions is the Scriptures? It’s not. That’s the “logos,” not the “rhema.” (One is the written word ‘logos’ the other a spoken word ‘rhema’). KJV and NKJV will NEVER reveal this to us. It would be more accurately said as, “Man may not live by bread alone but by every freshly spoken word of God.” I use fresh loosely to emphasize a spoken word ‘in the moment.’ This is from my own research and study in His Word. I believe the Spirit guides us and prompts us when we run across things like this. They aren’t heretical, but it really brings things alive and is food for our souls. Bless you brother

  • @jasonbryan3135
    @jasonbryan3135 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Great video. The Geneva Bible (1599) is great! If reading it you'll notice the definite article "the" is replaced with "that" which is jarring at first but you get used to it.
    What I have found with the Geneva is that it reads more "modern" than the KJV, like if the ESV and KJV had a baby. Plus it has the Reformers study notes which is a great help.
    Matt, your videos actually helped me leave my Baptist background and become reformed. Thank you! There isn't a Presbyterian Church around me that isn't liberal but I found a Reformed Church that uses the three forms of unity with its roots in the Dutch Church and it's been a blessing.

    • @ronlanter6906
      @ronlanter6906 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I belong to a reformed Baptist church. We are *Particular* Baptists!

    • @ronlanter6906
      @ronlanter6906 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I used to be with a PCUSA (only because there where no PCA/OPC churches around but thank God Almighty that He brought me to a solidly Reformed Baptist (Particular Baptist) church. Praise God the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit!

    • @eriq54321
      @eriq54321 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I noticed the "begotten Son" at john 1:14 was removed from the kjv that was originally posted in the 1599 geneva Bible

    • @ronlanter6906
      @ronlanter6906 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@eriq54321 Very interesting! Reminiscing of the *filioque controversy*

    • @mkshffr4936
      @mkshffr4936 ปีที่แล้ว

      1599 is my go to as well.

  • @dacoelec
    @dacoelec 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The ESV uses the Wescott and Hort which takes the liberty to remove quite a few verses that are in the textus receptus. I use and recommend the NKJV.

  • @Yeoman1346
    @Yeoman1346 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    I am a Missouri Synod Lutheran and I love reading the ESV. I have a lot of King James given to me by relatives. Nothing like psalm 23 or Luke chapter 2 in King James. I like the NASB as I have know a few seminary professors who used it until ESV came out. That’s my take.

    • @WordAboveAll
      @WordAboveAll ปีที่แล้ว

      th-cam.com/video/AQxOS6tXfH8/w-d-xo.html

  • @karenboyd6293
    @karenboyd6293 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    I am one of the souls that Jesus saved, when I was a 22yo married college student!! It still brings tears to my eyes. It was 1973 and KJV was the MAIN Bible in the church I attended. I taught in a Christian School and that was the version we used. I believe that learning to read KJV really helps with brain vebal developement of the brain. In fact when I was in elementary school and Bible reading was included we memorized things from the KJV. However I was always confused by Psalm 23, but as a 1st grader I wondered why the three girls:Shirley, Goodness, and Mercy, were following him around. As as a very new Christian I began trying to read a new translation/paraphrase, every year. Most of them have faded into obscurity. But then the NIV came out and I still love the 1984 version, whiich is falling apart. My next favorite was ESV. As a young woman, even in the 60's and 70's, the masculine language in Bibles did not bother me, one I started actually reading them. I am a mild feminist, but I hate when people ruin great writing in an attempt to be PC. Such as rewording the Carol, Let Chrisian folks rejoice instead of men.
    Which ruins the poetry. I am considering goint to the NKYV, because my ESV and are literally falling apart. But I don't like the actual book I just bought. So I am not sure.

    • @peacefulsoul77
      @peacefulsoul77 ปีที่แล้ว

      wow a Christian feminist... how can there be such a thing if you follow the world of God... makes no sense..

    • @BMEULTRAMAGA24
      @BMEULTRAMAGA24 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂 good 1 😅

  • @lierox9
    @lierox9 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    CSB is legitimately great, we adopted it at our church plant in rough area. Makes great translation choices, and isn't afraid to drop well known phraseology to do good translation (see Psalm 23). Perfect for unchurched new Christians in my opinion.

    • @strikeanywhere2981
      @strikeanywhere2981 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I agree. Give the CSB a fair shake.

    • @larrylogan2485
      @larrylogan2485 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Strongly agree

    • @MyPhilemon6site
      @MyPhilemon6site 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      KJV vs ESV & CSB
      A simple test on how a translation treats the deity of Jesus Christ….
      1 Timothy 3:16
      ESV- “Great indeed, we confess, is the mystery of godliness:
      He was manifested in the flesh,
      vindicated by the Spirit,
      seen by angels,
      proclaimed among the nations,
      believed on in the world,
      taken up in glory.”
      KJV- “And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory. “
      Notice the ESV and may I add CSB, NASB, NIV, New World Translation (JW’s Bible)
      Omitted “God” for “He”!
      “He” could be anyone , me, you, or anyone else! (Example: I was manifested in the flesh when I came into this world; I was vindicated in the spirit when I was born again; I am seen of angels then and now, etc)
      The King James Version specifically states that Jesus is God!
      Now the “Spirit of truth” would not testify otherwise!

    • @PiperAlilahLandon
      @PiperAlilahLandon 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I don't care for CSB. I guess we all have different choices.

    • @jeremythomas1777
      @jeremythomas1777 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Holman Christian Standard Bible is the choice for those who want a bold Bible.

  • @redstamp4185
    @redstamp4185 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    In my early years I loved the Revised Standard Version. In my middle years I loved the New King James Version. Since I've retired I have come to really love the old King James Version. I've tried the Tree of Life and some modern english versions and the very Hebraic Cepher version, but never loved them like those first three I mentioned. Regardless of which version you pick, just be sure to read the Bible. We need a dose of it daily to keep out of the darkness, and to become salt and light, and be renewed in our mind. God Bless you.

    • @redstamp4185
      @redstamp4185 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I forgot to mention that comparing translations to the Burean Study translation has gleened great insites for me. I think it is the next version I'd like to buy. I use it on the Bible Hub app.

  • @danielclooney6248
    @danielclooney6248 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Thanks so much for this video. I was raised on the KJV then later the NKJV. Then a SS teacher said he liked the ESV, I had to get one. But never could warm up to it, guess too many years in NKJV. Then I met a missionary living in Greece and speaks Greek. He said the NASB was his go to over any of the others. Got one of those and again, couldn't warm up to it so I'm back in my trusty NKJV.

    • @jamesaritchie1
      @jamesaritchie1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think God was stopping yo0u from warming up to the ESV. You'll find the devil in it more often than you find God.

    • @danielclooney6248
      @danielclooney6248 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ron_grimes Good. I know a missionary in Greece and he told me the same thing.

    • @danielclooney6248
      @danielclooney6248 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jamesaritchie1 Example please.

    • @lwmaynard5180
      @lwmaynard5180 ปีที่แล้ว

      Greens King James Bible with the Interlinear of the Old and New Testament ? and NEB. of the 1970s ASV are excellent older translations ?

  • @teknion00
    @teknion00 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Thanks so much for this video. Being 74, I was raised on the King James translation of course, but my favorite is the New King James translation. I think I have a copy of every translations there is, including the English Standard and 1977 edition of the New American Standard. And my son and his family gave me a new Geneva Bible for Christmas. Love it.

    • @TheBrownsberg
      @TheBrownsberg ปีที่แล้ว

      reprobate.

    • @jlotoo850
      @jlotoo850 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I love the NASB as well--the older 1977 edition, not the more modern ones which have changed critical things. I love how it keeps the more intimate language of Thee and Thou in place when addressing God in prayer. There is nothing more intimate than prayer--expecially in John 17 when it is a conversation within the Godhead. To change it so that Jesus is saying 'you' to the Father in prayer is like Jesus putting the Father at arms length. Stick with the 1977 NASB, thank you. The newer ESV and NKJV just change things too much as compared to the NASB 1977 edition. They have been trying to change things ever since that Masterpiece was done. (Satan was not happy with that version so he went into overtime coming up with all the new versions to confuse people after that--even 'modernizing' the NASB 1977 version in 1995 and 2000....)

  • @DesignInNature
    @DesignInNature 2 ปีที่แล้ว +119

    After many years of using modern translations, I recently fell in love with the authorized KJV. I can't seem to connect with my NASB as much anymore for my devotional study. The KJV just hits me differently at a deeper level.
    I still enjoy my NASB for comparison when diving deeper into certain passages. Mainly because my large study bible with commentary is the NASB.
    But again, the authorized version has just been a huge blessing to my life lately.

    • @WordMadeFlesh777
      @WordMadeFlesh777 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      Yea I’m no KJV only, but yea….there is just something special about the KJV. Has a flow and is actually easier to read than the others when you get used to it.

    • @smpittsburgh264
      @smpittsburgh264 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I can relate! After many years in the modern versions, I came to read in the KJV. Comparisons among them lead me to leave the modern versions behind. Memorization and retention are easier, I find, in the KJV--surely a help with the 'belt of truth' and the 'sword of the Spirit.'

    • @glorifythyname7777
      @glorifythyname7777 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      It's because the KJV is inspired and preserved words.

    • @Praise___YaH
      @Praise___YaH 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Guys, HERE is The Savior
      YaH The Heavenly FATHER HIMSELF was Who they Crucified/Pierced for our sins and “HERE IS THE PROOF”
      From the Ancient Egyptian Semitic:
      "Yad He Vav He" is what Moshe (Moses) wrote, when Moses asked YaH His Name (Exodus 3)
      Ancient Egyptian Semitic Direct Translation
      Yad - "Behold The Hand"
      He - "Behold the Breath"
      Vav - "Behold The NAIL"

    • @TXplayneJayne
      @TXplayneJayne 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I use the NKJV. Just easier to read and understand. KJV I have is very small type that I cannot see it to read. NKJV has much larger type.

  • @joeymac6970
    @joeymac6970 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Which one do you pick when these three don’t agree?

  • @robchesley4591
    @robchesley4591 ปีที่แล้ว +180

    I like to "feel" like I'm reading the word.. I like reading the KJV in firelight. It's like spiritual therapy ..

    • @MrThatWatchman
      @MrThatWatchman ปีที่แล้ว

      Holy Ghost Grief, You have grieved God
      I felt the grief of the Holy Spirit, it was deep and sorrowful. God is sad because people have replaced Him with the bible and reject the Living Christ.
      th-cam.com/video/mi6bYD6DHGw/w-d-xo.html

    • @VRcation
      @VRcation ปีที่แล้ว +7

      It’s also inaccurate and has opened the door for things like Calvinism to exist for augments 1 Corinthians 1:18 from “being saved” to “been saved”
      Also in John 1:18, changes the word God to Son. Without context, crazy to not call Jesus God when it literally does in the original Greek.
      Craziest example is 1 Corinthians 1:18 though which now opens the debate of “can you lose your salvation?” The verse literally says “being saved” meaning that you that salvation in a verb not an adjective.
      - someone who went to a KJV only college and absolutely destroyed professors. I can’t tell you how many times my questions in class were answered with just “ask me about that after class”

    • @captainandrew016
      @captainandrew016 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@VRcation right, because you have some 'authority' on these things. In what way is the KJV inaccurate? You give me a verse and I will PROVE to you that you are wrong. The greatest failings that can happen to Christians is misreading the Word in order to exalt yourself.
      So you go back to the 'original' Greek and Hebrew, and tell me God made a mistake in the english translations. I'll tell you He didn't.
      Or you can save yourself the trouble and burn Wescott and Hort's modern garbage.

    • @dulls8475
      @dulls8475 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@captainandrew016 Westcott and Hort the fathers of the poor modern wretched translations.

    • @kevincourtney7312
      @kevincourtney7312 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@captainandrew016 Are you aware that the KJV came from the Catholic church and the later translations came from ancient manuscripts found in the North African desert that were untouched by the Catholic church? Textus receptus doesn't mean that it was transmitted directly from God, it means received text provided by a priest named Erasmus of Rotterdam. Calvin was using the same texts that the KJV translators used as he also came out of the Roman church.

  • @jansturm9335
    @jansturm9335 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I got saved by reading The Living Bible! And I know others have. I’m more into the NKJV now, but the TLB was my starting point.

  • @timnicely1579
    @timnicely1579 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I’m right there with you, came out of a KJV only tradition, but now in my studies i rely on the KJV and ESV mainly for the reason you sited. When doing my daily devotional reading, I still love the flow and language of the KJV. Thanks for the great content of this video.

    • @Praise___YaH
      @Praise___YaH 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      HERE is The Savior
      YaH The Heavenly FATHER HIMSELF was Who they Crucified/Pierced for our sins and “HERE IS THE PROOF”
      From the Ancient Egyptian Semitic:
      "Yad He Vav He" is what Moshe (Moses) wrote, when Moses asked YaH His Name (Exodus 3)
      Ancient Egyptian Semitic Direct Translation
      Yad - "Behold The Hand"
      He - "Behold the Breath"
      Vav - "Behold The NAIL"

    • @davidemme2344
      @davidemme2344 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Praise___YaH So when Jesus was dying on the cross, who was he praying to when he prayed, "My God, My God, why have you forsaken me"? By the way, you gave no proof of anything. You asserted a translation that is not the same text the scriptures were given in. On the other hand, you havee not detailed where one could gind this, "Ancient Egyptian Semitic" Where do I find this and can it be read by a non speaker of the language you say it is in? I don't think I saw anything like that in all I have available to me and when it is 30,000 resources with Logos, why could I not find it in Logos? So you are what? A oneness Pentecostal of some soort?

    • @Praise___YaH
      @Praise___YaH 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@davidemme2344 - 2 Things
      1. Revelation 22:16
      jesus is the “offspring of David”, jesus, The “Bright Morning STAR”, IS LUCIFER, the “son STAR of Morning/Dawn” (Isaiah 14)
      2. Moshe (Moses), was born in Egypt, raised by the Egyptian Pharaohs daughter and Egyptian Semitic was his language, NOT Hebrew. The Hebrew language did not exist until 300 years after Moshe’s death
      Isaiah 19:25
      “Blessed be Egypt my people...”

    • @Praise___YaH
      @Praise___YaH 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@davidemme2344
      Salvation is Simple sir
      HalleluYAH translates “Praise ye YaH”
      YaH is The Heavenly Father
      YaH arrives via the TENT OF MEETING
      YaH was Who they Crucified for our sins
      ** NO FEMALE INVOLVED WHATSOEVER **
      - Hebrew Book of Isaiah
      Isaiah 42:8
      "I am YaH; that is my Name! I will not yield my glory to another or my praise to idols.
      Isaiah 43:11
      I, I am YAH, and there is no other Savior but Me.
      Isaiah 45:5
      I am YaH, and there is none else.

    • @MrThatWatchman
      @MrThatWatchman 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      All that bible worshipers can see and believe is “all scripture was given by inspiration of God”. They search the scriptures for in them they THINK they have eternal life but they never come to the Living Christ that they might actually have life (John 5:39-40). Bible worshipers are covenant breakers, because they reject the Holy Spirit (New Covenant)

  • @DeweyParrish-dn2zu
    @DeweyParrish-dn2zu 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    KJ, NKJ, NASV, ARE MY CHOICE!!!
    Thanks brother!!!

  • @wycheholt1902
    @wycheholt1902 ปีที่แล้ว +286

    I have always read the KJV ( I’m 22) and will always.

    • @TouchTheUniverse
      @TouchTheUniverse ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Why?

    • @bw2442
      @bw2442 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      The beauty of the KJs is, it is keyed to the strongs concordance, otherwise I enjoy the different translations to bring out depth and width of meaning in the word. The KJ is not perfect as many proclaim. It has some weak and outright wrong translations in very important areas, Calling the body of Christ “the Church” instead of the called out ones has focused generations on a building instead of people. And the translations about hell and everlasting punishment are wrong when compared to original texts.

    • @tallswede80
      @tallswede80 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@TouchTheUniverse
      it was used during the expansion period of christianity. the fruit of the modern translations, has been the decline of christianity and the west, and the rise of the extreme perversions that we see today.

    • @tallswede80
      @tallswede80 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@bw2442
      You don't have and have never read the "original texts".

    • @lyndam6640
      @lyndam6640 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      KJV ONLY

  • @SMElder-iy6fl
    @SMElder-iy6fl ปีที่แล้ว +17

    I grew up in the Southern Presbyterian church which remained conservative. I grew up with the KJV and still think of memorized verses in the King James of my childhood.

  • @938quilt
    @938quilt 2 ปีที่แล้ว +71

    I like the KJV as it makes me slow down and 'explain' passages as i go along. plus it's beautiful and helps me keep it reverent and I love the connection to the saints it has - for centuries it's all people used

    • @glorifythyname7777
      @glorifythyname7777 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      It's God's pure words

    • @leonardhunt7241
      @leonardhunt7241 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Oftentimes I think the KJV was put together with more prayer than some others, but I continue to use the Interlinear Bible and Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance with Hebrew and Greek dictionaries.

    • @resetsetmefree478
      @resetsetmefree478 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@LittleLouieLagazza yes the older English versions like that really make you pause and study it more in depth. I can see why many churches use the KJV for services , people like the sound of the old Thee and Thou

    • @dkgrace6743
      @dkgrace6743 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@resetsetmefree478 It's not the sounds of the thou's and thee's, it's their meanigs.
      th-cam.com/video/chMKvPgnYsY/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=BelieveTheBible

    • @MrThatWatchman
      @MrThatWatchman 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The GOSPEL is NOT written with ink, nor on tablets of stone, but on our hearts by the Spirit of the Living God. Under the New Covenant we are to be led by the Holy Spirit, not the bible.

  • @CookedAnimalEater
    @CookedAnimalEater 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Thank for clearing that up. God bless you.

  • @peggyspurlock3012
    @peggyspurlock3012 ปีที่แล้ว +53

    I love NLT to me, I can hear Jesus talking to me so easily in it.

    • @johnnytrejo911
      @johnnytrejo911 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I like this version for new believer’s when they come to Christ. During the years when I was getting involved in the Harvest Crusades . We would share with New believers and give them the New Testament bibles with Pastor Greg Laurie’s footnotes in the NLT New Believers New Testament bibles 👍🏼

    • @SeamusDelion
      @SeamusDelion ปีที่แล้ว

      Trash. That's a thought for thought translation. Pure trash.

    • @PsykoHoneyWeed
      @PsykoHoneyWeed ปีที่แล้ว

      2 Corinthians 2:17 KJV "CORRUPT the WORD of GOD" no other translations or versions can pass that TEST

    • @peggyspurlock3012
      @peggyspurlock3012 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@PsykoHoneyWeed so when did you learn to read ancient Greek texts and Hebrew. How are you going to get your camel 🐪 through the eye of that needle 🪡.

    • @lymphomasurvive
      @lymphomasurvive ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@PsykoHoneyWeedThe KJV is a corruption of the Word. It’s dedicated to an English king.

  • @heyjace7213
    @heyjace7213 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    We use kjv at church. I really enjoy John McArthur’s Legacy Standard Bible for personal reading at home. I too was surprised by the message. I learned so much reading thru it. It’s almost like an explanation of the bible. Very helpful read.

    • @MrThatWatchman
      @MrThatWatchman 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      *Come out of Babylon's churches (confusion), and put away your bible Idols (Bible = Babel = Confusion)*
      All that bible worshipers can see and believe is “all scripture was given by inspiration of God”. They search the scriptures for in them they THINK they have eternal life but they never come to the Living Christ that they might actually have life (John 5:39-40). Bible worshipers are covenant breakers, because they reject the Holy Spirit (New Covenant)

    • @donnachap7249
      @donnachap7249 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      KJV NKJV and the legacy are the best The rest are getting to liberal in their theology! ESV has some issues as well by Changing some meanings to words!! Have a blessed day all!

    • @respectingthewordpodcast
      @respectingthewordpodcast ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@MrThatWatchman what are you talking about???

  • @danny_r27
    @danny_r27 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I use a NIV 1984 print that was gifted to me when I was saved in 2010 which luckily was right before it was replaced with the 2011 NIV revisal. It’s special to me because of that reason and you can tell how much it’s been used. Never written in it other than my name on the first blank page and I love it but I also use an ESV study Bible from crossway and I just ordered an illuminated ESV Psalms scripture journal because psalms is my favorite book and would love to write down my thoughts and what the Lord puts in my heart during that reading time as well as what certain verses mean to me. I’m slowly dipping my toes into the ESV translation as I try to gather more knowledge to eventually be able to minister and spread the gospel. My 1984 NIV Bible has a special place in my heart and will be the one I use for my personal use while the ESV will be for my own personal Bible studies and write down thoughts that the Lord instills in me while reading as well as highlight verses that stand out to me that I may need in the future.
    The KJV is difficult for me to read as English is my third language and since I live in the U.S. I choose to pray and read scripture in English I prefer translations that are easier for me to read. And because English is the language that’s most common around the world today just like how Greek was a common language during the time of Jesus and the apostles during their time of ministry and writing down what we will eventually use as scripture from their gospels and writings.

    • @MyPhilemon6site
      @MyPhilemon6site 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      KJV vs ESV
      A simple test on how a translation treats the deity of Jesus Christ….
      1 Timothy 3:16
      ESV- “Great indeed, we confess, is the mystery of godliness:
      He was manifested in the flesh,
      vindicated by the Spirit,
      seen by angels,
      proclaimed among the nations,
      believed on in the world,
      taken up in glory.”
      KJV- “And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory. “
      Notice the ESV and may I add NASB, NIV, New World Translation (JW’s Bible)
      Omitted “God” for “He”!
      “He” could be anyone , me, you, or anyone else! (Example: I was manifested in the flesh when I came into this world; I was vindicated in the spirit when I was born again; I am seen of angels then and now, etc)
      The King James Version specifically states that Jesus is God!
      Now the “Spirit of truth” would not testify otherwise!

    • @Gl0ckb1te
      @Gl0ckb1te 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If you want a good easy to read but faithful to the majority text, i recommend The Voice bible. There is a study bible version out of print called Compass study bible.

  • @berhanegebriel3155
    @berhanegebriel3155 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    In addition to your PCA, I also recommend you go to Ethiopia and Eritrea a week or two before Christmas and Easter to Lalibela, Ax(ks)um in Ethiopia and The Monastery of Debre Bizen in 4:49 Eritrea.Both of them are on TH-cam also. Just a personal suggestion . I am satisfied with The NIV and NKJV STUDY Bibles.

  • @avondalemama470
    @avondalemama470 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Two of my ancestors were King James translators. Lancelot Andrews and his brother, Roger, I believe it was.
    The KJV is my favorite, and I go from there.

    • @jamesottaway3212
      @jamesottaway3212 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      If you have KJV translators in the family tree I would strongly encourage you to be definite about names and as much else as you can possibly find out. What a neat thing!!!

    • @oceansams5886
      @oceansams5886 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Awesome 👌

  • @garystevens1532
    @garystevens1532 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I’m with you on the NKJV. I, too, am a now retired pastor but still teach in a Senior Adult Sunday School class. KJV is obviously what I as a seventy-nine year old grew up with in the forties, fifties. In the eighties I purchased a New King James and haven’t seen a need to change. I was also an English teacher for several years and retention of the iambic pentameter coupled with, as you mentioned, the change of many archaic words with modern equivalents

    • @Kirk-d7v
      @Kirk-d7v 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@garystevens1532
      You should check out the Chronological gospels by Michael J Rood (seventy weeks ministry)

  • @nuggetoftruth-ericking7489
    @nuggetoftruth-ericking7489 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This was interesting. Thanks

  • @lchav52
    @lchav52 8 นาทีที่ผ่านมา

    Interesting. And your ‘triangle’ is also mine, and for much the same reasons. I love the KJV, carry the NKJV to church, and use the ESV Study Bible (massive though it is!) at home for in depth study. As for the Greek text, I lean toward th Majority Text, but have several.
    As for the CSB, alhough I am Baptist, I do not care much for it. As you say,”It’s just not my thing.”
    Glad I found you online this morning. Good program!

  • @michaelis37
    @michaelis37 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Great video! I am a new believer and was given a NKJV study Bible. I really like it, but have a hard time understanding some of the terms and sentence structures. The ESV really helped me. But then I had people telling me the NASB is better. I feel great reading the two I have. But being someone who really wants to study the word and understand it to its fullest, it’s refreshing to know that someone who studies as much as you do prefers the same. God Bless you and everyone who reads this comment!

    • @4givenembracd618
      @4givenembracd618 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Welcome to the family of God❣️ I was saved during the “Jesus Revolution” so I’m an old lady, but I still get so excited to meet a new believer! May our Father continue blessing you with the realization of His passionate love for you and with a growing, deep, intimate relationship with Jesus, and may His Spirit continue filling you with increasing hunger for His word! That (His word) is what will sustain you in whatever trials you might go through and it will give you all the wisdom and discernment you’ll need to navigate these days when even the existence of Truth is being challenged.
      God bless you, dear brother! ❤

    • @frustratedmajority851
      @frustratedmajority851 ปีที่แล้ว

      The KJV is God's perfect and preserved words, I promise you. All the other versions are corrupt catholic knockoffs to put it kindly.
      Pray about it sincerely and ask God to show you if I'm lying. We are in the greatest apostasy today since the dark ages

    • @hestia598
      @hestia598 ปีที่แล้ว

      i have nrsv catholic and protestant and niv. i suggest you should read these books

    • @slamfire6005
      @slamfire6005 28 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@frustratedmajority851learn more about how translations are made.

  • @gus1537
    @gus1537 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    I was raised on KJV, but 30 yrs ago switched to NKJV. I fought the change till one day the Holy Spirit, spoke to me in the Inward Voice. They all work, if my people will use them, believe them and get to know me, personally, read one that you understand and the way I speak to you. since then I was free from religious tradition that makes the word of God of no effect.🔥🔥

    • @patrickblue3813
      @patrickblue3813 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      You do realise that there is certain words in the NKJV (as well as other "New" versions of other translations) that has been changed from what they originally was in the KJV
      Some may seem small and insignificant changes BUT they can and do have a huge impact on the Truth
      Just one small example is found in Revelation 13:16-17, I suggest you read both the KJV and the NKJV for that passage and see for yourself
      Are you really sure it was the Holy Spirit ? did you test the "inward voice" to see if they was who they said they was ? (if no, then why not ?)

    • @ezequiasquezada5238
      @ezequiasquezada5238 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Your arguments seem flawed as you advocate for the exclusivity of the English version, disregarding the diverse perspectives and wisdom of English speakers over the past 1600 years. Embracing both the KJV and delving into the Greek reveals a richer understanding. The NKJV, catering to contemporary speakers, stands as a commendable translation for our times.
      The beauty of Greek lies in its nuanced expressions, offering a spectrum of translations beyond the confines of the KJV. Each word holds a tapestry of meanings, allowing for diverse and insightful interpretations.

    • @terry5914
      @terry5914 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ezequiasquezada5238 Anti-freeze has a beautiful taste to it, but it will kill you if you drink it. Error is not something anyone should spend their time with if they are sincere. The Ancient Greeks could not even get Christ's proper name right.

    • @Jonathan_Gen15.6
      @Jonathan_Gen15.6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      By these standards… shouldn’t we all learn Hebrew/Aramaic & Greek to get the “truest” translation of God’s word?
      Isaiah 55:11

    • @Bob-gn8ph
      @Bob-gn8ph ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@Jonathan_Gen15.6spend some time over at TRUTH IS CHRIST ❤

  • @faithwalker7
    @faithwalker7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I use the 3 Bible translations you mentioned. KJV, NKJV & THE ESV. I used these 3 for years. Great teaching on the translations. Just ran across your channel today.

    • @timothy4557
      @timothy4557 ปีที่แล้ว

      Darby and Rotherham is great.

    • @MyPhilemon6site
      @MyPhilemon6site 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      KJV vs ESV
      A simple test on how a translation treats the deity of Jesus Christ….
      1 Timothy 3:16
      ESV- “Great indeed, we confess, is the mystery of godliness:
      He was manifested in the flesh,
      vindicated by the Spirit,
      seen by angels,
      proclaimed among the nations,
      believed on in the world,
      taken up in glory.”
      KJV- “And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory. “
      Notice the ESV and may I add NASB, NIV, New World Translation (JW’s Bible)
      Omitted “God” for “He”!
      “He” could be anyone , me, you, or anyone else! (Example: I was manifested in the flesh when I came into this world; I was vindicated in the spirit when I was born again; I am seen of angels then and now, etc)
      The King James Version specifically states that Jesus is God!
      Now the “Spirit of truth” would not testify otherwise!

  • @bethpike3833
    @bethpike3833 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I really like reading The Passion Translation. It touches my heart in a way others do not. But generally I read the NKJV or NASB or ESV for study and for meditation. But then the Passion when I can just relax with it and let God speak to my heart.

  • @huskerite2
    @huskerite2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    The NASB reference edition is where I am at home. That came with studying Greek. For example, Eph. 4:22 "lusts of deceit" is exact and is only found in the NASB. In addition, if they ever substitute a word that is for readability, but not literal, they tell you that in the reference column. They also do not leave out any verses found in the KJV, that may have been added for clarification. They too are found in the reference column. Alternate translation possibilities are also there. Perhaps you didn't look closely enough. But I appreciate you and your ministry. God's peace.

    • @jlotoo850
      @jlotoo850 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      YES! I so agree! I love the NASB as well--the older 1977 edition, not the more modern ones which have changed critical things. I love how it keeps the more intimate language of Thee and Thou in place when addressing God in prayer. There is nothing more intimate than prayer--expecially in John 17 when it is a conversation within the Godhead. To change it so that Jesus is saying 'you' to the Father in prayer is like Jesus putting the Father at arms length. Stick with the 1977 NASB, thank you. The newer ESV and NKJV just change things too much as compared to the NASB 1977 edition. They have been trying to change things ever since that Masterpiece was done. (Satan was not happy with that version so he went into overtime coming up with all the new versions to confuse people after that--even 'modernizing' the NASB 1977 version in 1995 and 2000....)

    • @trainleader21
      @trainleader21 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Same here. NASB is the literally translation of the Bible, then I also use ESV.

    • @jlotoo850
      @jlotoo850 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@trainleader21 Nope--my pastor reads from ESV while I follow along in NASB 1977 version----to many 'little' changes that actually affect the meaning of the verses. There was nothing wrong with the NASB 1977 version. They changed it because it was too threatening to have people able to understand the real gospel reading it. Notice our last BIG revival/spiritual awakening was when that Bible came out---people got saved left and right. Immediately after that the enemy suddenly went into overdrive to bring out 'new versions'--NIV etc etc. The more new versions that come out, the darker our nation has become. Go back to the NASB 1977 version and watch revival HAPPEN!

    • @christinekemper7347
      @christinekemper7347 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@jlotoo850yes. The 77 version of NASB is a good one 😊

    • @LuckyLadyZee
      @LuckyLadyZee 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@jlotoo850 the way I ran to Amazon for a 77 NASB keyword study bible ❤ thank you 😊

  • @ronlewis9374
    @ronlewis9374 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Thank you for your videos. You are bringing Biblical Theology in a straight forward no nonsense way that is easy to understand. I can't quite call myself reformed but I find that reformed pastors, such as you are really speaking to my spirit. R. C. Sproul is one of my favorite authors / Teachers and I'm looking forward to getting your new book. Thank you again.

  • @65marlee
    @65marlee ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Love the ESV bible.

  • @vshrum
    @vshrum 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Good insights. My three are NKJV, NASB and CSB.
    No mention of the New Living translation… Does that tell us all we need to know?

    • @slickbill9488
      @slickbill9488 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Not at all, he has other videos where he says the NLT is a very good translation

  • @michaelarmstrong7300
    @michaelarmstrong7300 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I grew up kjv, preached from it for years. Still has a huge place in my heart, as well as nkjv. But most recently I'm preaching from nasb. In my personal devotions I'm reading from the lsb.
    Good call on your top three.....

    • @Praise___YaH
      @Praise___YaH 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      HERE is The Savior
      YaH The Heavenly FATHER HIMSELF was Who they Crucified/Pierced for our sins and “HERE IS THE PROOF”
      From the Ancient Egyptian Semitic:
      "Yad He Vav He" is what Moshe (Moses) wrote, when Moses asked YaH His Name (Exodus 3)
      Ancient Egyptian Semitic Direct Translation
      Yad - "Behold The Hand"
      He - "Behold the Breath"
      Vav - "Behold The NAIL"

    • @rmviv4rmviv443
      @rmviv4rmviv443 ปีที่แล้ว

      You all should also check out the analytical literal translations (alt3) of the bible by gary f zeolla its a bible set so and has concordance and companion and (why these books are in the bible) books so to me it's more trustworthy when an author can back up what he did also you can add and take away books that you think is canonical and have a place in the bible or not. Also check out the third testament spirit of truth I hope to hear more people conversate and debat it but as far as can tell it's scriptural and the knowledge of it has been proven based of my experience the only thing is that I can't find much research about it so I'm hoping to see videos of research. Plus based on my research god seems to be calling an Era every 2000 years and has been releasing a book around every Era. In around 2000bc he released the old testament around 400ad he released 2nd testament and about 1900 he released the third testament spirit of truth. I know things are done in cycles to. And I know people miss out on understanding and seeing his miracles because they aren't truly following him that's what happens to the people who knew about Jesus but weren't truly following the made the mistake of crucifying him..

  • @amberbarnes1183
    @amberbarnes1183 ปีที่แล้ว +48

    Grew up with KJV. Using a NLT funny thing, during my study the other day got out my KJV to flip back and forth thru verses and remembered how much I loved reading the KJ translation!!

    • @galatians22122
      @galatians22122 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      th-cam.com/video/7XUn0V_B8sY/w-d-xo.html

    • @HappyPenguin75034
      @HappyPenguin75034 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nobody studies NLT. It’s to read and never study.

  • @edbrown5665
    @edbrown5665 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I use kjv. My wife uses niv and we keep a nkjv in the house so we often cross-reference between the 3. I've found that this helps to get a closer understanding of the meaning as originally intended.

    • @jeanenelatique
      @jeanenelatique ปีที่แล้ว +5

      That is great because you get to study together and understand more with all the versions. ❤

    • @michaelsburger665
      @michaelsburger665 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why in the world would these 2 bibles call Jesus as God's servant, this is wrong, ????
      we as Christians know that Jesus is the Son of God, can anyone deny this fact, no, Jesus is God's Son, now they say NKJB precise translation,
      then why do the NKJB and the NIV state the following they are both corrupt
      NKJB
      Acts 3:13 The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, the God of our fathers, glorified His Servant Jesus, whom you delivered up and denied in the presence of Pilate, when he was determined to let Him go.
      Acts 3:26 To you first, God, having raised up His Servant Jesus, sent Him to bless you, in turning away every one of you from your iniquities."
      NIV
      Acts 3:13 The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, the God of our fathers, has glorified his servant Jesus. You handed him over to be killed, and you disowned him before Pilate, though he had decided to let him go.
      Acts 3:26 When God raised up his servant, he sent him first to you to bless you by turning each of you from your wicked ways.”

  • @yellyukulelly7334
    @yellyukulelly7334 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    KJV at 5 years old, then at 15 NIV and LOVED it, now I'm back to kjv mostly.

  • @kahrenthriscutt3269
    @kahrenthriscutt3269 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I love KJV, but have just bought the Legacy Standard Bible, which I'm enjoying very much.

  • @Sin_Brings_Death
    @Sin_Brings_Death ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I've read the KJV, NRSV, and NLT cover to cover multiple times each. I respect the KJV and use it as a reference Bible. The NRSV is useful as a non-denominational ecumenical text when speaking with Christians from other denominations, but when I read the Bible for pleasure my favorite is the NLT.

    • @Daegdon
      @Daegdon ปีที่แล้ว

      I like the NLT and the Jewish JPS old testament.

  • @Scobyland
    @Scobyland 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I have started using the LSB. I like it.
    When I came to know the Lord, I only used the KJV. Then I switched to the NASB.
    I now mostly use the NKJV, the NASB. Aside from those two, I use the LSB, the ESV, and NIV.
    I have been reviewing, and improving my Greek since April.
    Thank you for your review.

    • @MyPhilemon6site
      @MyPhilemon6site 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      KJV vs ESV
      A simple test on how a translation treats the deity of Jesus Christ….
      1 Timothy 3:16
      ESV- “Great indeed, we confess, is the mystery of godliness:
      He was manifested in the flesh,
      vindicated by the Spirit,
      seen by angels,
      proclaimed among the nations,
      believed on in the world,
      taken up in glory.”
      KJV- “And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory. “
      Notice the ESV and may I add NASB, NIV, New World Translation (JW’s Bible)
      Omitted “God” for “He”!
      “He” could be anyone , me, you, or anyone else! (Example: I was manifested in the flesh when I came into this world; I was vindicated in the spirit when I was born again; I am seen of angels then and now, etc)
      The King James Version specifically states that Jesus is God!
      Now the “Spirit of truth” would not testify otherwise!

  • @renmuffett
    @renmuffett 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The New Testament was 1st written in Aramic since that was the language spoken at the time of Jesus by Hebrews. Then it was translated into Greek. Even the old Testament in Hebrew was translated into Greek before it was translated into English. I have been enjoying looking up those original Aramic writings. It's so fascinating. Helps me understand at a whole new level. Thanks for your recommendation. I grew up on only the KJV, then turned to RSV for the remainder of my life. Now want to read the ESV and NIV.

  • @steverees1936
    @steverees1936 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I did some research into Bible translations before I bought one and those three Bibles came out on top in every test and recommendations. My wife kindly bought me an ESV Study Bible and I love it. It's full of historical information and maps etc. I'm so glad you also chose it as one of three choices.

    • @rmviv4rmviv443
      @rmviv4rmviv443 ปีที่แล้ว

      You all should also check out the analytical literal translations (alt3) of the bible by gary f zeolla its a bible set so and has concordance and companion and (why these books are in the bible) books so to me it's more trustworthy when an author can back up what he did also you can add and take away books that you think is canonical and have a place in the bible or not. Also check out the third testament spirit of truth I hope to hear more people conversate and debat it but as far as can tell it's scriptural and the knowledge of it has been proven based of my experience the only thing is that I can't find much research about it so I'm hoping to see videos of research. Plus based on my research god seems to be calling an Era every 2000 years and has been releasing a book around every Era. In around 2000bc he released the old testament around 400ad he released 2nd testament and about 1900 he released the third testament spirit of truth. I know things are done in cycles to. And I know people miss out on understanding and seeing his miracles because they aren't truly following him that's what happens to the people who knew about Jesus but weren't truly following the made the mistake of crucifying him.

  • @abba2me
    @abba2me ปีที่แล้ว +7

    In 1980 I began my journey with the KJV, and used it for about 5 years. Then switched to the NKJV, which I very much enjoyed and used in the first years of Bible College. While in Bible college I adopted the 1977 NASB, and used it for many years until the ‘95 NASB came out. My preference was to use the most literal precise translation of the most evidenced manuscripts available. Although I have bought and referenced other translations, the NASB ‘95 remained my number one translation for about 23 years. When the Legacy Standard Bible became available in 2021, I was immediately smitten by the refinements and improvements to the NASB. The translators have done an amazing and thorough job in making revisions to the ‘95 NASB, while avoiding the more “politically correct” liberal leanings of the NASB 2020. As of today, the LSB is my preferred translation, although I often read from my old NASB ‘95 Bible with 20 years of notes. It’s like “home” to me. Maybe after my LSB editions get well worn and full of notes, I’ll feel at home with them. You are someone who will understand that sentimentality I’m sure. Anyway, thanks for the video, it was really interesting.

  • @flowerlass
    @flowerlass ปีที่แล้ว +8

    My husband and I were in a small Bible study when we were in our 30s, and most of the other members were above 65. If anyone read a verse from a Bible other than the KJV, a woman in her 80s would say, "OK. Now I will read the verse from the real Bible." I will never forget how much I loved hearing her read from the KJV. I agree with you that it is much easier to memorize Scripture from the KJV. I use the ESV.

    • @grantsmythe8625
      @grantsmythe8625 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, for many nostalgia plays a large part, if not the major part in their choice of versions.

    • @louisaccardi2268
      @louisaccardi2268 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hogwash @@grantsmythe8625

    • @michaelsburger665
      @michaelsburger665 ปีที่แล้ว

      the ESV is corrupt
      please find
      Matthew 12:47 removed
      Matthew 23:14 removed
      Mark 6:11 removed last 23 words
      Mark 7:8 removed last 15 words
      Mark 7:16 removed
      there are many more
      I found the following bibles to be corrupt
      NIV, NKJV. NRS, NC, ESV, NAS, RS, LB, GNB, RV

    • @MyPhilemon6site
      @MyPhilemon6site 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      KJV vs ESV
      A simple test on how a translation treats the deity of Jesus Christ….
      1 Timothy 3:16
      ESV- “Great indeed, we confess, is the mystery of godliness:
      He was manifested in the flesh,
      vindicated by the Spirit,
      seen by angels,
      proclaimed among the nations,
      believed on in the world,
      taken up in glory.”
      KJV- “And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory. “
      Notice the ESV and may I add NASB, NIV, New World Translation (JW’s Bible)
      Omitted “God” for “He”!
      “He” could be anyone , me, you, or anyone else! (Example: I was manifested in the flesh when I came into this world; I was vindicated in the spirit when I was born again; I am seen of angels then and now, etc)
      The King James Version specifically states that Jesus is God!
      Now the “Spirit of truth” would not testify otherwise!

    • @keithmussey9635
      @keithmussey9635 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Respectfully, you may want to use another example to prove your point. The previous verses immediately before 3:16 clearly state that God indeed is the main subject matter (ESV):
      “14 I hope to come to you soon, but I am writing these things to you so that, 15 if I delay, you may know how one ought to behave in the household of God, which is the church of the living God, a pillar and buttress of the truth.”
      Remember, context matters. What is written verses, even chapters before or after a verse helps define God’s Word. 😊

  • @victoryak86
    @victoryak86 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Finally a modern Christian pastor/scholar who does not dismiss the KJV. I absolutely love it for all of the reasons he lists, though I do not say it is the only one we should use as he also is not saying. But for me it is the best.

  • @loganlake9980
    @loganlake9980 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    I’m a NASB guy. I love the ESV, CSB and the NLT as well.

    • @murielpucoe9213
      @murielpucoe9213 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Those tramslations are the ones that make muslims and atheists critisize. They change words which they dont accept, like begotten son.... modern book say unique son. I mean who doesnt understand begotten? Only americans?

    • @apostolicwatchman8824
      @apostolicwatchman8824 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @loganlake9980 the NLT is not actually a translation.

    • @umarae27
      @umarae27 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@murielpucoe9213 I've heard that the 2020v is problematic to a lot of ppl of all cultures, but i haven't heard that the 1995v is.

    • @murielpucoe9213
      @murielpucoe9213 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@umarae27 to us in South Africa that grew up with UK type of english , we find it unacceptable for America to do translations to suit their communities, because that causes problems when the word"begotten" is translated to " unique" . Thats why muslims insist thatvthe bible is changed.... because of these changes in words.

    • @umarae27
      @umarae27 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@murielpucoe9213 i understand & agree. However, the 1995 version did not take it out.
      The newer 2020v did, yes. But *not* the 1995v

  • @oshea2300
    @oshea2300 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +93

    I was a junkie and I learned how to use/apply/ read a King James Bible in jail. The Holy Ghost taught me. The Holy Spirit will show you what peradventure means. And wot not means. That's why back in the day they used to use the King James Bible to teach people how to read. When they teach you to read, they teach you to use context clues. We know how important Bible context is. If God's word is important and preserved, why would you change it and update it. Why wouldn't you update your minds to learn it instead of looking for perversions, and watered down paraphrases.

    • @miketatreau2347
      @miketatreau2347 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      I don't know what other influences you've had, but you managed to get sucked into the cultish mindset of King James Onlyism. What you don't seem to understand is that the original writings of Scripture are what God inspired-not the King James translation or any other translation for that matter. But if you want the most accurate English translation, you should read the 1995 NASB.

    • @greatbriton8425
      @greatbriton8425 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@miketatreau2347 The NASB is based on the corrupted Critical Text, see "THE WORDS OF GOD: KJB or Modern Bibles?"

    • @greatbriton8425
      @greatbriton8425 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      100% agreed. The Lord led me to the King James and it changed my life. After a few months my sister asked me, are you reading the Bible a lot? You've changed.
      Of course I had to get used to the thees and thous but it was so easy, and the spirit that arose from the KJV was like a drink of water I had to keep coming back to. BTW Thou thee thy thine are just the singular form of You ye your yours, like I me my mine are the singular of Us we our ours. The T words fell into disuse because the King used to use the royal 'we' (the people) and his courtiers started calling him 'you' instead of 'thou'. This spread as a politeness to lords and ladies and finally down to all folk, until thee and thou became an insult to use, as we see in Shakespeare where one character says to the other, "Dost thou 'thou' me, thou dog!"
      When I next read my old Bible, the NIV, it was cold and in fact snake-like. I am not joking.
      The King James Version 1769 is God's ordained translation, his perfect word, preserved for us today. See "Irrefutable Proof in 60 min: The KJB Superseded Hebrew and Greek" and many others from Truth is Christ

    • @michelletidler6773
      @michelletidler6773 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@miketatreau2347 whats the NASB? Is that short for New American Standard Bible?

    • @miketatreau2347
      @miketatreau2347 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@michelletidler6773 Yes

  • @zerochaos1
    @zerochaos1 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I'm in agreement with the video author. The KJV, NKJV, and either ESV or NASB. My preference overall is the NKJV. The beauty of the language is lovely and poetic. I read it more often than that other 2-3 by a substantial margin. An important question is "which can you memorize and really remember?" I've found that I remember the NKJV best, can memorize it, and can quote it very accurately. I've found that while I love the ESV and NASB, I cannot do that. Yes, I can closely approximate but I find myself missing a key word or confusing a phrase or confusing two separate scriptures. The next most memorable is of course the KJV. It is a miracle, classic, majestic, accurate, melodic.

    • @scottbrandon6244
      @scottbrandon6244 ปีที่แล้ว

      What about the NIV?

    • @zerochaos1
      @zerochaos1 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@scottbrandon6244 Good question. NIV 1984 was solid. Now the owner has forced all licensees (sellers) to the 2011 or later versions which have made accommodations that are not accurate.

    • @abc-wv4in
      @abc-wv4in ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@zerochaos1 I have a few nice new NIV84 Bibles that I'm hoarding. Not really; I'm giving one as a graduation gift. I don't like the newer NIVs. NKJV is my favorite but I also love the NASB95 (not so much the 2020), ESV, and KJV.

  • @JordanMiller-m9t
    @JordanMiller-m9t 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank Pastor God Bless. I WILL START READING.

  • @jonathanskeet5076
    @jonathanskeet5076 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    The very first things I really learned to read were bible verses in the meeting hall (Brethren) where my parents took me, from my birth onwards. I remember starting to read my dad's King James bible during the services, and looking at the pictures. One of the headings over the text was "Jesus heals divers sicknesses" "Divers" was the old rendering of "diverse" I found the pictures that this conjured up in my mind very moving, of Jesus standing over some poor guy, huddled on the floor on a harbour wall somewhere, struggling for breath after nearly drowning in a diving accident....

    • @kalulu1675
      @kalulu1675 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @jonathanskeet5076 LOL That's what I thought, too! One thing the KJV does is build your awareness of vocabulary changes.

    • @jonathanskeet5076
      @jonathanskeet5076 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@kalulu1675 To say nothing of the healing of the "impotent" (i.e paralysed) man!

  • @callieflanagan3310
    @callieflanagan3310 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I feel like the nkjv and the esv are so balanced to use together. This confirms my thinking there. Thanks.😊

  • @johnenglish4652
    @johnenglish4652 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Thanks, great video. My favorite Bibles are KJV, NKJV, NASB, LSB and NLT. But my everyday reading is NKJV this year because as I read through the Bible I like to have a bit of Study help so I'm using the NKJV Life Application Bible and as time allows also the LSB and NLT. I think I've bitten off to much. I hadn't considered the Message, although I've got nothing against it. I grew up in Presbyterian churches before the present craziness so the KJV has been a favorite. I'm presently in an Independent Baptist church. Last year I went through The KJV Study Bible that had reformation notes. It is a good one too (The Reformation Heritage Study Bible, KJV).

  • @ugenegareth9339
    @ugenegareth9339 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I answered and said, "If I have found favor in thy sight, O Lord, show this also to thy servant: whether after death, as soon as every one of us yields up his soul, we shall be kept in rest until those times come when thou wilt renew the creation, or whether we shall be tormented at once?" 76 He answered me and said, "I will show you that also, but do not be associated with those who have shown scorn, nor number yourself among those who are tormented. 77 For you have a treasure of works laid up with the Most High; but it will not be shown to you until the last times.
    78 Now, concerning death, the teaching is: When the decisive decree has gone forth from the Most High that a man shall die, as the spirit leaves the body to return again to him who gave it, first of all it adores the glory of the Most High. 79 And if it is one of those who have shown scorn and have not kept the way of the Most High, and who have despised his law, and who have hated those who fear the Most High -- 80 such spirits shall not enter into habitations, but shall immediately wander about in torments, ever grieving and sad, in seven ways.
    81 The first way, because they have scorned the law of the Most High. 82 The second way, because they cannot now make a good repentance that they may live. 83 The third way, they shall see the reward laid up for those who have trusted the covenants of the Most High. 84 The fourth way, they shall consider the torment laid up for themselves in the last days. 85 The fifth way, they shall see how the habitations of the others are guarded by angels in profound quiet. 86 The sixth way, they shall see how some of them will pass over into torments. 87 The seventh way, which is worse than all the ways that have been mentioned, because they shall utterly waste away in confusion and be consumed with shame, and shall wither with fear at seeing the glory of the Most High before whom they sinned while they were alive, and before whom they are to be judged in the last times.
    88 "Now this is the order of those who have kept the ways of the Most High, when they shall be separated from their mortal body. 89 During the time that they lived in it, they laboriously served the Most High, and withstood danger every hour, that they might keep the law of the Lawgiver perfectly. 90 Therefore this is the teaching concerning them: 91 First of all, they shall see with great joy the glory of him who receives them, for they shall have rest in seven orders.
    92 The first order, because they have striven with great effort to overcome the evil thought which was formed with them, that it might not lead them astray from life into death. 93 The second order, because they see the perplexity in which the souls of the unrighteous wander, and the punishment that awaits them. 94 The third order, they see the witness which he who formed them bears concerning them, that while they were alive they kept the law which was given them in trust. 95 The fourth order, they understand the rest which they now enjoy, being gathered into their chambers and guarded by angels in profound quiet, and the glory which awaits them in the last days. 96 The fifth order, they rejoice that they have now escaped what is corruptible, and shall inherit what is to come;
    and besides they see the straits and toil from which they have been delivered, and the spacious liberty which they are to receive and enjoy in immortality. 97 The sixth order, when it is shown to them how their face is to shine like the sun, and how they are to be made like the light of the stars, being incorruptible from then on. 98 The seventh order, which is greater than all that have been mentioned, because they shall rejoice with boldness, and shall be confident without confusion, and shall be glad without fear, for they hasten to behold the face of him whom they served in life and from whom they are to receive their reward when glorified.
    99 This is the order of the souls of the righteous, as henceforth is announced; and the aforesaid are the ways of torment which those who would not give heed shall suffer hereafter." 100 I answered and said, "Will time therefore be given to the souls, after they have been separated from the bodies, to see what you have described to me?" 101 He said to me, "They shall have freedom for seven days, so that during these seven days they may see the things of which you have been told, and afterwards they shall be gathered in their habitations."
    102 I answered and said, "If I have found favor in thy sight, show further to me, thy servant, whether on the day of judgment the righteous will be able to intercede for the unrighteous or to entreat the Most High for them, 103 fathers for sons or sons for parents, brothers for brothers, relatives for their kinsmen, or friends for those who are most dear." 104 He answered me and said, "Since you have found favor in my sight, I will show you this also. The day of judgment is decisive and displays to all the seal of truth. Just as now a father does not send his son, or a son his father, or a master his servant, or a friend his dearest friend, to be ill or sleep or eat or be healed in his stead, 105 so no one shall ever pray for another on that day, neither shall any one lay a burden on another; for then every one shall bear his own righteousness and unrighteousness." 2 Esdras 7:75
    /////////////////////

  • @kolsonmaddox777
    @kolsonmaddox777 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I’ve been reading NKJV and KJV over the past few months but over the past couple week’s mainly KJV. It has become my favorite for sure and I’m just used to the old English when reading the Bible

    • @kevinbrown348
      @kevinbrown348 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm the same way. When you get comfortable with the KJV it's hard to go back to other translations.

  • @nathansmith8241
    @nathansmith8241 2 ปีที่แล้ว +59

    Interesting philosophy! I personally love the CSB, but could easily use the ESV and do use the NKJV in my church where I’m a youth pastor. My only pet peeve is that I end up spending a considerable amount of my teaching time just explaining terms that reach over my teens & pre-teens. But all in all we have a plethora of good translations that make God’s word accessible!

    • @MrNanonen
      @MrNanonen 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Teaching the meaning of words seems very much needed nowadays, since many people don’t even know what a woman is.

    • @scottbrandon6244
      @scottbrandon6244 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I find that too. I had a tough time explaining to youth what a covenant was. They just did not get it. Teens also seem to have a problem with much of the Old Testament and taking those stories and applying them to their own life.

    • @Noah-rv9uj
      @Noah-rv9uj 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@MrNanonen unfortunately :(

    • @MrThatWatchman
      @MrThatWatchman 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The GOSPEL is NOT written with ink, nor on tablets of stone, but on our hearts by the Spirit of the Living God. Under the New Covenant we are to be led by the Holy Spirit, not the bible.

    • @MrThatWatchman
      @MrThatWatchman 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      All that bible worshipers can see and believe is “all scripture was given by inspiration of God”. They search the scriptures for in them they THINK they have eternal life but they never come to the Living Christ that they might actually have life (John 5:39-40). Bible worshipers are covenant breakers, because they reject the Holy Spirit (New Covenant)

  • @StevenCole1971
    @StevenCole1971 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    I love the New King James

  • @vipnetworker
    @vipnetworker หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I agree with each of these points. For ease of reading, especially for those new to the faith, I like the NLT.
    There is a lot of excellent scholarship behind the translation as well as many excellent study Bibles and tools done in NLT.
    I am currently reading cover to cover in NKJV, also an NLT chronological study Bible, and using an ESV study Bible for extra reference.
    I also love using the YouVersion Bible app to easily switch between translations for extra clarity.

  • @adamfischer333
    @adamfischer333 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I was raised in the church and my early years were KJV only. That was the version that I had memory verses of in sunday school and children's church. It is the version that the leaders of my church preached out of. KJV was the only version I knew until sometime in the 1990s. When my parents saw that I wanted to start reading the Bible, they got me a Living Bible translation. The Living Bible made everything easy to understand for me and made the Bible come alive in a way that it hadn't before. In the late 90s, after I had been reading the Living Bible for a few years, I got my first study Bible and it was NIV. I stayed almost exclusively with the NIV for the next 20 years. I now consult different versions when preparing lessons and sermons. I find that when you consult different versions you can get a better picture of the contents of the verse. Personally, I think my progression from the more reader friendly version of Living (New Living or Message might be good alternatives as well) to the NIV (an in-between translation in my opion as far as readablity) and now consulting a variety of versions and commentaries to deepen my knowlege made me fall in love and understand the Bible. The understanding that I had as a foundation was able to be built on with other verions that are more word-for-word.

  • @BrianJHilliard
    @BrianJHilliard ปีที่แล้ว +18

    The reason I continue to read the KJV transition, is because I enjoy studying and exegeting God’s Word. Many modern English translations are easier to read, but it’s not necessarily better.
    I love to go beyond the surface of scripture and go into the deep waters. Studying Hebrew and Greek to help me understand the Word of God, keeps me in-tuned with the KJV.

    • @jwatson181
      @jwatson181 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I read it in Latin because that is even better. Harder = better

  • @1mulekicker
    @1mulekicker 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Les Feldick is my Bible study teacher. He has read them all and still uses the KJV. Rightly dividing the word is the goal, changing or adding words is a flaw. Reference or Concordance, Scofield or not, the Gospel revealed by Paul it all that matters. In the beginning there was God. Some translations say, "a God", big difference. Yes, the word "Race" might be a good fit instead of "Fight" at the end of Timothy, but it's not the original and "Fight" is still more relevant. Good luck on your mission to muddy the waters. C'ya!

    • @missmartpants2269
      @missmartpants2269 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Dr Gene Kim is great also. He rightly decides the word or teaches us to. He is also KJV only and he explains why. God bless!

  • @carolmingus2754
    @carolmingus2754 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for this video. New to the bible and have enjoyed my first complete reading of the NKJV and now excited to try the ESV next...but I really do love the NKJV!!!!! !

  • @craig3540
    @craig3540 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Totally agree with you. I do love NASB (1995 version)

    • @rodpitt2709
      @rodpitt2709 ปีที่แล้ว

      I prefer the ‘77 version

    • @MyPhilemon6site
      @MyPhilemon6site 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      KJV vs ESV, NASB, etc
      A simple test on how a translation treats the deity of Jesus Christ….
      1 Timothy 3:16
      ESV- “Great indeed, we confess, is the mystery of godliness:
      He was manifested in the flesh,
      vindicated by the Spirit,
      seen by angels,
      proclaimed among the nations,
      believed on in the world,
      taken up in glory.”
      KJV- “And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory. “
      Notice the ESV and may I add NASB, NIV, New World Translation (JW’s Bible)
      Omitted “God” for “He”!
      “He” could be anyone , me, you, or anyone else! (Example: I was manifested in the flesh when I came into this world; I was vindicated in the spirit when I was born again; I am seen of angels then and now, etc)
      The King James Version specifically states that Jesus is God!
      Now the “Spirit of truth” would not testify otherwise!

    • @benmorgan9748
      @benmorgan9748 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@MyPhilemon6site When capitalized, "He" refers to God.

  • @Dwayne_Green
    @Dwayne_Green 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Awesome! I have been doing all my personal devotions and reading from the KJV and I've been preaching from the NKJV. I haven't really settled on a critical editions that I 'regularly' go to, but I often reference the CSB, BSB, and the NET notes.

    • @Praise___YaH
      @Praise___YaH 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      HERE is The Savior
      YaH The Heavenly FATHER HIMSELF was Who they Crucified/Pierced for our sins and “HERE IS THE PROOF”
      From the Ancient Egyptian Semitic:
      "Yad He Vav He" is what Moshe (Moses) wrote, when Moses asked YaH His Name (Exodus 3)
      Ancient Egyptian Semitic Direct Translation
      Yad - "Behold The Hand"
      He - "Behold the Breath"
      Vav - "Behold The NAIL"

  • @almillard2946
    @almillard2946 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Love your choices. I started with the NKJV some 20 years ago, most of my memorized verses are in that translation. I do better with the NASB than the ESV, just personal preference, and I’m probably in the minority in that regard. Just recently started using the KJV a little and am gaining an appreciation for its beauty and elegance. Having started with the NKJV has given me a leg up in understanding the archaic words and phrases as I’m reading it. Thanks for sharing your expertise!

    • @charlesf2804
      @charlesf2804 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Then I'm in the minority too. I use the NASB, KJV and NKJV for hard study. If I buy/read anything else, it's for the format of the features, not the translation. Example: I have The Apologetics Study Bible (HCSB); I bought it for the apologetics content.

    • @Revelation18-4
      @Revelation18-4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The NKJV is a corrupted bible. Some of the covers on the NKJV have the satanic triquetra on it. 🤔

    • @Terry_and_Dena
      @Terry_and_Dena ปีที่แล้ว

      I also use the NSAB as primary and ESV as secondary as well as New King James. The problem with the King James for me, is the language for some of the 1800 Elizabethan translation that you have before you is the meaning of the words have changed in the last 150 some odd years since the translation of the King James.
      It sounds fancier because it's using words we don't use anymore, but I just don't want to be confused with words that have changed the meaning and modern times versus then was throws off what the verse is that I'm reading.
      I have no issues with those who can do so, God did not design my brain to be one of those.

    • @Revelation18-4
      @Revelation18-4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Terry_and_Dena The meaning of the words has not changed. The Jesuits and the Vatican versions corrupted the words to deceive people. A sin still means sin, a dog, still means dog, etc. The King James bible is written on a 5th grade reading level. Why is it that people can understand Shakespeare's writings, but can't read the King James bible and understand it? It's not rocket science.

  • @amazinggodchannel3513
    @amazinggodchannel3513 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Amazing!
    God is so good!
    Thank you so much for great revelation about King James Version.
    I love it translation!
    I used it for a long time.
    I was 41 years in serving God.
    Keep up the good works!
    Our labour is not in vain.
    God bless you, your family and ministry.
    It's me, Rev. Ricardo Gayo from Philippines.
    #Godfirst01

  • @michaelwittkopp3379
    @michaelwittkopp3379 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Well, I grew up on Billy Graham. But, I myself was/am Calvary Chapel. I think you made some good picks, and a lot of sense. My KJV was printed in 1948. Lost my NKJV & ESV somewhere in all my years of travel. _(KJV lost its cover back in the 60s.)_ Picked up a NIV a few months ago, but haven't been able to get into it. It's too different. And, I also have to admit that I like using the internet versions of translations a lot. _(Eyes aren't what they use to be.)_ And I will also admit that the internet has been a blessing for me. Not only for scriptural text, but also locating different Biblical studies. _(There's so much available to us nowadays... and I am a Biblical Archeology nerd. So, I'm having a heyday.)_

  • @jimmiespeach
    @jimmiespeach ปีที่แล้ว +20

    So glad to hear that you approve of the KJV! I have always believed it to be the very best translation! And I agree that it is so much easier to memorize because of the unusual language. I just recently found you on the Internet, and I am very happy that I did. You're very clear, concise and easy to understand. No gimmicks, or sleezy music being played in the background. Thanks, and keep up the good work.!

  • @nuccirossi
    @nuccirossi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Great info Matt!! Thank you for all you do for the Kingdom!!

    • @rmviv4rmviv443
      @rmviv4rmviv443 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You all should also check out the analytical literal translations (alt3) of the bible by gary f zeolla its a bible set so and has concordance and companion and (why these books are in the bible) books so to me it's more trustworthy when an author can back up what he did also you can add and take away books that you think is canonical and have a place in the bible or not. Also check out the third testament spirit of truth I hope to hear more people conversate and debat it but as far as can tell it's scriptural and the knowledge of it has been proven based of my experience the only thing is that I can't find much research about it so I'm hoping to see videos of research. Plus based on my research god seems to be calling an Era every 2000 years and has been releasing a book around every Era. In around 2000bc he released the old testament around 400ad he released 2nd testament and about 1900 he released the third testament spirit of truth. I know things are done in cycles to. And I know people miss out on understanding and seeing his miracles because they aren't truly following him that's what happens to the people who knew about Jesus but weren't truly following the made the mistake of crucifying him.

  • @blue_samurai_zero
    @blue_samurai_zero หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The best thing about the KJV is that Strong's numbering system is keyed to it. When I study with the ESV, I have the KJV in parallel so that I can find the Greek & Hebrew words to look up.

  • @philtheo
    @philtheo 25 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    LSB is another good translation. 😊 It's in essence a revision of the NASB95. James White said something like it's the NASB95 perfected, though I don't know about that. Its most notable features are using Yahweh instead of Lord, using slave consistently for doulos, and using other Hebrew and Greek terms consistently (e.g. lovingkindness for hesed). I think ny favorite thing about the LSB is the name. LSB is a lot more palatable to English speakers outside of America, whereas NASB can make it sound like it's primarily a translation for Americans.

  • @jimproud3116
    @jimproud3116 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thank you Matt for your comments on these translations. I became a believer in early 1958 and at that time everyone in my circle of friends used the KJV and looked askance at using the Revised Standard Version. The first Bible I bought for myself was KJV in the Scofield Study Edition. So I learned early to accept the dispensations! I was involved with the Navigators and learned to memorize many many verses. That has stood me in good stead all these years. I and my friends were eagerly awaiting the whole Bible in the NASB but it was different than all the verses I had memorized in the KJV and so some of my memorized verses began to slip away not getting reviewed as much. So I settled on the NKJV and have not regretted it. Also I use the Phillips New Testament when I want to get another view on some passages. I love it.

    • @Gl0ckb1te
      @Gl0ckb1te 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I love acts 8 20, in philips version.
      Ephesians 2:10 the voice bible has the most beautiful way

  • @EdThePastor
    @EdThePastor 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I like to compare different versions. My go-to Bible is ESV. I like the NCV because it is written at a 3rd-grade reading level and also not a bad translation. NKJV works well for me as a final to round out.

    • @MyPhilemon6site
      @MyPhilemon6site 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      KJV vs ESV
      A simple test on how a translation treats the deity of Jesus Christ….
      1 Timothy 3:16
      ESV- “Great indeed, we confess, is the mystery of godliness:
      He was manifested in the flesh,
      vindicated by the Spirit,
      seen by angels,
      proclaimed among the nations,
      believed on in the world,
      taken up in glory.”
      KJV- “And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory. “
      Notice the ESV and may I add NASB, NIV, New World Translation (JW’s Bible)
      Omitted “God” for “He”!
      “He” could be anyone , me, you, or anyone else! (Example: I was manifested in the flesh when I came into this world; I was vindicated in the spirit when I was born again; I am seen of angels then and now, etc)
      The King James Version specifically states that Jesus is God!
      Now the “Spirit of truth” would not testify otherwise!