My ancestors have both been in guiness book of world records for longevity, living well over 100 years old, my grandma died at 101 and my grandfather at 98. They always told me to balance everything in life, dont be strict and rigid in what you eat...but only eat whole foods (not processed). They are Japanese and only ate pizzas a few times a year, and it is always home made with ingredients grown in the backyard or from local farmers. 99% of the time we eat asian food, meat rarely...lots of tofu and veggies...fruit for dessert, very little seasonings...almost no oil (used water instead). Also they kept their mind active, my grandparents played video games on the pc my husband built them...they laughed a lot...and went for walks every day...they LOVE animals and sees them as a great blessing. They really stressed on BALANCE to me and my brothers, or ying and yang!
nutrition changed , as did health in the Okinawan pop. - the longest-lived historical population we know probably - from the 1950s to present day. 1950s was probably the optimal.
I have no credentials but I've had a Venn diagram in my head for twenty five years. I noticed the overlap of the two main diet camps which is (just as he said) to eat vegetables and whole foods, don't eat added sugar and processed grains, so that's where I've lived. I'm now 90 percent whole food plant based, but the "whole food" part is as important to me as the "plant" part. I would sooner eat a piece of fish with a salad in a traditional restaurant than an oily, pasta based meal with no beans in a vegan restaurant.
@@moondog7694 No, I completely expect vegan restaurants to be vegan.but, from my experience, I don't expect them to be "healthy." I guess quotes should be around the qualifier, if I used it. Thanks for pointing that out. It's very frustrating for me because I live in a major city and anytime a new vegan restaurant opens, I get excited , hoping I can get a healthy plant based meal, but invariably, the menu is a far cry from whole food. These restaurants cater to ethical vegans who are looking for fun foods. I get it, but it's not what I'm looking for. And the few vegan restaurants that offered whole, plant options that included beans, vegetables, whole intact grains and a dressing made from seeds, are going out of business, one by one. I patronized a few of these for twenty years. Now they're gone. Nowhere for health conscious plant based eaters to dine. It seems the processed vegan movement has overtaken the vegan health movement.
@@sectionalsofa very sad, my favorite restaurants are healthy whole food based vegan restaurants. There's one near where I live and thankfully it does good business.
@@queengoblin I live in NYC and there once were a number of them. One was amazing. I guess they could't afford the rent. Now, there are only two restaurants that I know of that serve at least one truly wfpb dish (like a Buddha bowl) but they're not great places. And honestly, from what I've seen, I think it's just a matter of time till they go under too. :(
Same here. I have taken the best from the different food tribes and am very happy with what I have come up with. Now I am at the point of small tweaks now and then as I learn more.
It's so refreshing to see realistic, science based, non-extreme nutrition information on TH-cam. It seems like 90% of the nutritional information on TH-cam is focused on about 5% of the population at the extreme ends of the spectrum.
True, but those extremes are the videos that draw the most eyes which in turn prompts TH-cam to promote them more, and it snowballs further from there. Nuanced thought doesn't play very well in an economically incentivized environment like this.
lazy people are usually the most unhealthy and lazy people don't want to put effort into getting healthier so these fad diets like vegan or carnivore get the most popularity for sponsoring "this one trick to get healthy". lazy people swallow that faster than mcdonalds.
GPT4 Summary: The video features a discussion with Dr. Christopher Gardner, a nutrition scientist at Stanford University. Here are the key takeaways: 1. **Foundational Diet**: Dr. Gardner emphasizes the importance of a foundational diet that includes more whole foods and vegetables, less refined grain, and less added sugar. He believes that most dietary approaches, even those at polar opposites like keto and low-fat vegan, agree on this foundation. He suggests that if people could focus on these four aspects, it would resolve about 75% of nutritional issues. 2. **Individual Differences**: He acknowledges that individuals respond differently to diets. Some people thrive on certain diets while others don't. He believes that this could be due to differences in satiety responses to different foods, microbiomes, and metabolic factors. 3. **Quality of Carbs**: He discusses the importance of the quality of carbohydrates in the diet. He suggests that replacing low-quality carbs with high-quality ones could lead to better health outcomes. He also mentions that protein intake tends to remain consistent across different diets. 4. **Adherence to Diets**: Dr. Gardner talks about the difficulty of adhering to strict diets in real-world settings. He mentions that in his studies, participants were encouraged to find a balance in their diet that they could maintain in the long term, rather than trying to strictly adhere to a specific percentage of macronutrients. 5. **Personalized Nutrition**: He discusses the potential of personalized nutrition, where diets are tailored to individual needs and preferences. He suggests that while a foundational diet is important, there is room for personalization based on factors like satiety responses, microbiome differences, and metabolic factors. 6. **Impact of Life Events**: He mentions that life events can significantly impact a person's ability to stick to a diet. He suggests that during stressful times, being part of a study or maintaining a certain diet can provide a sense of control. 7. **Future Research**: Dr. Gardner expresses interest in further research to understand what explains the variability in how people respond to different diets. He mentions factors like satiety, the microbiome, and respiratory quotient (a measure of metabolic rate and the mix of fuels being used by the body) as potential areas of exploration.
When talking about nutrition, even though this is not an obligation for scientists, I think it's important to take into account also how compatilble a diet is for most of the population. This envolves economics and ethnicity, for instance. Most of the world cannot digest lactose, most people cannot buy good quality fish, especially sea fish. In those cases it is important to ask what are the alternatives for those foods, since guidelines are based around them
I am interested in this aspect, too. Yes, genetics are a factor, but what role does habit play in feeling satiated after a meal? And are there studies that look at the psychological level of habit building, in terms of ways that one might “reprogram” one’s habits and what makes you feel full/satiated after eating something that would previously have left you hungry?
it's certainly a less dogmatic approach; at the same time acknowledging both the commonalities across his experience in populations as well as small differences that can lead individuals to thrive on one diet/lifestyle vs another. Connection of the statistical to the individual is quite difficult in practice, and we all are looking for the ultimate anecdotal advise- that which is applicable to a sample size of 1 (yourself). I find it quite telling that the macros and breakdowns over the past few decades have actually remained pretty consistent, even if they are highly weighted towards crap carbs (no shock there) here in the west. My personal experience with intentional hypertrophy, is that is a dedicated effort, every day, to force yourself to consume north of 20% protein (eg- hit something like 1g protein/lb). Supplementation is basically required. I'm sure some dedicated keto and carni advocates here will pop in to disagree, but this is my lived reality. Fascinating as always, thanks Gil!
The point about most of these extreme diets being hard to stick to for most people, but not for some, is quite interesting to me. I find most types of food pretty tasty and don't mind repeating the same meal every day so it has been pretty easy for me to stick to "extreme" diets like HCLF and vegan keto, but I think something I was overlooking is how little benefit there actually is to going this far. All these TH-cam doctors promise you marvelous benefits to sticking to their special variation of a diet, like "curing" cancer, diabetes, heart desease, etc., and even extending life/healthspan. But in reality I imagine 90% of the benefits come from just cutting out all the processed foods & being at a healthy weight, and if you're trying to go beyond that, it quickly becomes a case of diminishing returns. Or at least, it seems like we don't currently have enough scientific evidence to support anything beyond that. And all these people trying to eke out those last 10% of benefit are the ones getting riled up every time there's a new study that comes out that didn't go extreme enough in enforcing some sort of diet.
I'm amazed people still aren't aware low-fat diets do eliminate diabetes, if the fat is dropped below 20%; some say 15%. So does low-carb(and I'm against LC diets). The reason this works is because diabetes is caused by a high mix of carbs AND fat together.
@@GaryHighFruit weird, all the ones that I know/knew (t2d) got it via carb and carb only (or mostly). All the ones getting better are either via lowerLC or keto, myself included via lowerLC...
@@rualablhor ou must be overlooking fat in their diet(maybe some hidden fat). A lot of people call junk-food "carbs", but they're about 60% fat by calories. And 2% milk isn't 2% of calores from fat; it's 2% of weight. It's about 40% fat. Similar story with lean-meat.
This a very fascinating as well as the most comprehensive discussion I have heard (as a non-academic) about diet, nutrition, and health all packed in one place. As a retired scientist in my 70'ies, (Ph.D. in material science), find such discussions and information priceless. As we are living at a time where there is total information overload at the speed of light, it is so helpful to have such content that is credible and worth more than all the books I can read in a year to extract the core information I need to make personal health decisions.
Having binged on TH-cam nutrition videos for about three months, I have to say this is the single most informative and entertaining one I've come across. Thank you for pulling so much together.
@@burger101ful Dr. Gardner emphasizes the importance of a foundational diet that includes more whole foods and vegetables, less refined grain, and less added sugar.
I say this over and over again, you don't have to focus on cutting calories. Focus on eating more whole foods. Whole foods are already naturally lower in calories.
In my experience satiety changes. But yes, in my transition to a healthier diet, I first went for more nuts - to replace junkier foods I had in my diet & deal with cravings. I eat a lot less of those nuts now, because the cravings are gone. So I do think a change mindset is crucial. When transitioning to a healthier diet: swap unhealthy processed foods for healthier plant based foods - that work for you right now. And then when you're at something stable that works, you can start tweaking, because baseline has changed.
Coherent talk from Dr. Gardner. He boils all the various diet discourses down to a simple common foundation: eliminate sugar and refined flour (bad carbs) and tinker with good fats, protein and low carbs to suit your own metabolic traits. Thanks Gil for having this guest.
Thanks for summing it up as when they said the last 50 yrs, im like diets were shit then, they invented Betty Crocker. They need to address addictions, religions lots of work to do and learn were just a young planet of biology and Stardust.
BWT Them examples of that fancy word "satiation" I looked at the food examples and would select 2 Oats and Blueberries looks delicious and appealing wish I would have 3 squares x 2 a day. Peace.
The more I read about nutrition, the more confusion and division there is. What I discovered is there are some basic principles in most diets, regarding food quality. So I'm glad I'm on the right track with that.
I followed a low carb diet for 20 months which is very similar to what Dr. Gardner described, basically I eat everything except refined carbs and added sugar. I lost 20kg (about 44 pounds) in the first year (75kg - 55kg) without ever starving (except fasting on purpose occasionally). I was prediabetic with high blood pressure now all symptoms are gone. In fact I make sure to be full every meal. I eat whenever I want and may have 1, 2, or 3 meals a day, but mostly 2 meals a day. My GF and I taught many friends and relatives (including a buddihst monk) to do this and many of them succeeded as well. We use simliar approach by telling them cut carbs by half then another half, or have no carb days, or keep a ball park percentage, and eat whole foods to their perference, meat, fish, vegetables, etc. We also eat a lot of kefir, kombucha, sauerkraut, etc. that we made ourselves. Our menu are pretty flexible, we change the proportin of meat, fish, eggs and vegetables to our liking. We limit sweet fruits and foods with refined carbs and sugar by feel. It's not hard and doesn't need much dicipline. We made it a life style. We ended up eating more protein and a lot more vegetables on average (but fewer meals in total). Exercise and sleep also matter but that's another story.
My body reacts great to Mediterranean Keto, in fact I thrive on it. I don’t demonize carbs, in fact once a month or so I will carb cycle and hit some favourites. I miss carb dense foods less and less each cycle, as I taste more the actual flavors (or lack of). This holiday I ate some of my old favourites and just missed the great foods I’m on with Keto. The Whole Foods, and non-processed foods. I get all my macros and vitamins from my diet and look forward to each meal.
@@RogueCylon yes, same here. I enjoy each meal a lot more than before. I hardly miss carb foods while I could have them more liberally after a workout or hike, or when tasting local delicacies. I'm adding back a little more fruits and eploring exotic ways to cook rice and flour, such as turkish style rice with many spices, kefir raised dough, etc. There are so many things to experiment with.
So what do you consider as carbs ? Because I eliminated gluten, sugars, meat, but still don't feel good. But maybe I have other underlining conditions that might affect my wellbeing. I've got an anxiety disorders, which also affects my overall health.
@@8964-Winnie-Poo sounds like we are on a similar journey. Carbs have a place, highly processed carbs do not. I love trying new foods, and different nationalities. So when I want to carb cycle, I will say go to my favourite Indian restaurant (Himalayan actually as the family I trust), and they will on request cook my food in Ghee. I will enjoy Naan, Papads and lentils. I love Asian, Mediterranean (Spanish, Turkish, Greek, Italian) food, as well as French, and Portuguese. I love cooking, and my wife is an amazing cook. So we rarely do any processed foods now. If I want a simple healthy meal to break fast, one of my favourites is something I put together - chopped in a bowl Olives, Sweet Red Peppers, Pickled Cucumbers, Pickled Beets, Aged Goat and Sheep Cheese, or blue cheese, macadamia and Brazil nuts, some protein, often Italian made aged Prosciutto. Small batch fresh pressed EVOO, and ACV. I love it and never get bored of enjoying every morsel.
@@andymanland for anxiety, go out have more sun and exercise. I had it and got rid of it partly by doing extreme sports. If you feel depressed, go out and walk or jog, take a cold shower, watch horror movies, go for a bungee jump or sky diving, run a marathon, read good books. Get yourself stimulated.
Exciting to see two of my favorite nutrition experts talk to each other. There is so much reasoned sanity here in a wider field full of strident screaming matches. People don’t want to hear that the answer can hing on, “well, it depends.” The human diet has been so varied over a million years that it’s absurd to think that there is one, perfect diet. The message Drs. Gil and Chris deliver is that, while diet is important, and there are foundational concepts, stop stressing about it so much.
The human diet has not been that varied over millions of years. Pre agriculture (10,000 years ago) and before homo sapiens left Africa (60,000 years ago), we ate a pretty simple diet of meat and fruit. Maybe some occasional bugs and bark during famine, but definitely not more variety than most other species of animal.
@@oloblish Omnivores, as humans are, must be opportunists and use what's available, therefore your statement lacks common sense. Besides, there have been archeological finds from different locations with different results. One depended upon carbs from tubers and the like while others seemed to lean more on game. Food sources would vary considerably depending upon location and season. The fruit season would be limited a few months a year. Live near water and they ate fish. Inland, not. Etc. Etc.
@@Nicksonian Indeed, the key to our success as a species is precisely our adaptability in our available food resources. The very fact that we have both ketogenic and glucongenic pathways is a testament to this fact (as is more and more of the paleo-archaeological record).
@@bensmalley6357fun fact! The oldest direct evidence we have of cooked food is a tuber! You can imagine how valuable a high-energy, quick-release food like that would be when you're on the move. The particular tuber in question though does taste pretty bad
Totally sane! But it would be good to have a definition of a low quality carb. Sure table sugar and cake is bad but if i make a veggie Bolognese and have it with a good quality Italian pasta it doesn't FEEL like bad carbs. On the other hand I skip the entire bread aisle at the supermarket because what is sold as even whole grain bread there is actually cake!
Thanks for having such an esteemed guest. The professor's lecture of the various types of studies in nutrition is easily the best I have seen. It's two hours long but filled with excellent information and has solid, basic information in nutrition. Being wfpb, I'll admit I'm stuck in my camp to a degree, but I understand his philosophy, which may make the biggest difference across the population. He's targeting most people as opposed to the strictest but healthiest diet, but this is also a downside of what Nathan Pritikin calls "Maximum Compliance; Minimum Effectiveness". If most people can eliminate low quality carb as he recommends, and then up the high quality carbs, that will make a tremendous difference and it is in agreement with my theory that low fiber intake is the biggest problem to be solved, which is done by increasing high quality carbs. In my little world of whole food-plant based I have improvements to make like carefully measuring salt in the shaker daily; I'm far from perfect myself.
I really need to go to bed but I can't stop watching your videos. I"m really impressed with how you're explaining all the confusing information out there. Really Awesome!
Happy with the core diet, but if you have digestive problems, it is worth cutting back to a really simple diet then gradually adding things back in to check if you are allergic or sensitive to something. Gluten, wheat and lactose are the commonest such items, but other specific things like peppers, mushrooms, onions etc affect some people.
I think a lot of people need to learn to stop being scared of farting occasionally and learning that it is a sign of a healthy microbiome. This should be taught in childhood
Could not stop smiling through out this talk..finally hearing info that reflects reality. Good advice that is helpful..Been frantic dealing with all the contradictory info coming from all directions.
I am so grateful that someone on an Instagram post sent me here. I experience chronic illness and I have two groups of friends telling me the opposite things. One side is vegan and the other carnivore 🤦🏻♀️ My comment was how do I discern the truth cuz you can find tons of so called nutritional videos that attempt to prove that their camp is the ONLY camp
I actually do get over 50% of my calories from carbs (it's roughly 55/30/15 carbs/fat/protein), and the only refined grain I eat is Grape Nuts Flakes (which I eat for the vitamin B-12, as I'm a vegan and every b-12 supplement I've tried makes my face breakout). That is unless you count whole durum wheat couscous, which I think is still considered a whole grain? But anyway 3g of added sugar in the Grape Nuts Flakes and 0 in the couscous, and 9g of dietary fiber between them. That's the only added sugar in my diet. I also eat a half cup of steel cut Quaker Oats every day as well, but that's definitely a whole grain. I'm one of those weirdos who eats the exact same thing day in and day out, with only the occasional exception, so we do exist haha. I've just chosen foods that work for me where I can eat them day after day. I guess my diet would fall under the LLQC umbrella. Anyway great video as usual.
I have been vegetarian for 13 years and vegan for ~7 years. I stopped consuming eggs 15-16 years ago and pigs 15 years ago. I just disliked eggs, where they come from, what they represent and the smell. Then all of it became an ethical and moral issue for me, so I switched to plant-based diet and vegan life style. I have never went plant-based for my health, which I think is important to state. I was not really into healthy way of eating. I do not measure how much of anything am I putting into my body. People are the ones who made me feel anxious by constantly claiming that I am going to die, that my teeth will fall out etc. But, the opposite has happened. The last time I had a tooth problem was 9 years ago. Since then, I am just going for a regular check-up. That is weird because my teeth were never really a high quality. I started having enormous headaches at the age of 14. Two years into vegetarianism I have noticed that intensity has dropped. Once I went plant-based, they stopped. Now, I do have them once in a couple of months - which is nothing compared to what I used to have. My stomach does not hurt after the meals. It used to be bloated. My period pain has decreased in intensity. I still have them but I am not ending up in hospitals. With all that said, I wonder how much better would it all be if I actually took care of what I was eating, which is what I have decided to do now. Veganism helped me to get off refined sugar because there are not many vegan sweets out there. :D I would really like to know more about the dairy and breast cancer link. I read a lot of studies, but it is never enough. Thx.
I want to echo the sentiment of the OP, though I went from vegetarian (27 yrs) to vegan (7 yrs ago) for health reasons to improve my struggle with Type 1 diabetes. This actually worked very well - and lead to other, unexpected improvements (incl insights to animal rights :-) ). What I miss in reports on this channel is connecting the dots - how changing eating habits affect the environment (= OUR LIVING CONDITIONS !!) which in turn affects our lifestyle which reflects on our health. Sadly, academics' tunnel vision, and the quest for neat, easy to present reports, defeats the goal of advocating for whole-some living. It's not about *this or that factor* but about how it all plays out *together* and how we can achieve the necessary balance. A vegan WFPB lifestyle ticks all those boxes, IMO
I chose a low-carb diet as I could just pack away carbs, so every time I eat a diet with carbs, I just craved more. I think when I reach my goals, I will reintroduce carb in a small amount. I was 336lb now. I am now 289lb, so I have a way to go, but I would say that for the first time in my life, I have an understanding on how to eat in a way that suits my body and not use food as a crutch.
What he said about the refined carbs was mind blowing, we just don’t realize how much of it we eat. But the problem I find with the mainstream recommendations that we see today is that they conflate these refined carbs with regular ones, which are super healthy, and they try to replace them with protein, which is also not all the same, since that coming from meat comes with a lot more junk. They just say cut the carbs bump up the protein, and that ends up being cutting the fruits and veggies, potatoes, beans, and bumping up the meats, which are mostly saturated fats anyway.
This has been MOST helpful! My experience has been modifying my diet 1 element for a month, see how it changes, then keep/revert it and move on to another item. I've found that some food changes that work for me don't work for my wife and vice versa, while sometimes the same change affects us equally. I.e. our needs are a little different but mostly the same, and the lesson we learned was that follow a diet that works best for us. And neither of us have ever followed any popular, generalized diets, but the closest would be the Mediterranean diet.
Per what he was saying near the beginning about the low fat vs low carb diet, I got a DNA test for varied reasons related to health and one of the things I was told was that I show a genetic predisposition to need a low fat, higher carb diet. Which, before I was told that, I had already tried a higher fat keto diet and a lower fat keto diet, as well as eating primarily kitchari (but, sometimes still having a doughnut or some meat) and living for about a week and a half mostly following the advice of Dr. McDougall with a little Ornish advice thrown in, but still eating prefab burritos. Low fat keto diet worked great, as long as I did intermittent fasting AND had sudden bouts of eating candy, corn chips or rice. That sort of thing. I lost so much weight, felt great, gut was hurting so much less. Kitchari die worked great. Did not lose much weight but some even though I was eating 4 times a day and my gut felt better than on any keto diet. The week and a half of McDougall (basically) I lost 32 lbs and a lot of it was toxic waste. I was full of energy, definitely was burning fat. And, then I experimented and found if I had a little coconut milk the weight loss sllowed down but did not stop. If I had meat, the weight loss slowed down. If I had more processed food than the prefab burrito or two, the weight loss slowed down. If I had any significant portion of meat or processed food or fat, the weight loss stopped ead in its track and if I combined them, I would gain weight and my gut would start hurting again, so bad, and al the old bathroom problems would start. So, I learned a lot. I also learned that when people started nagging at me to invite people over and make them a real dinner, then the weight loss slowed down or even turned into weight gain and I had more cravings. I have no point other than to share information in case someone finds it helpful to know.
My vegetarian-mostly-diet uses a delicious mushroom and onion-based in oil/water base to which I add all kinds of other vegrtables including legumes (which are cooked separately to remove gas issue and then added fro the fridge) with more water. Add and simmer. Add salt and pepper and herbs. Make it delicious. 60, 62kg, 1m70. Play sport daily. Non-smoker/non-drinker.
I am 55yrs and have ulcerative colitis and then changes from menopause but recently realised I was avoiding fibre and depending on carbs as avoidance for other foods. I didn’t know you can change your ability to digest fibre if you do it incrementally and know the difference between soluble and insoluble. I have just really changed around and really low carb like a gluten free wrap a day. Now just plant based certain plants only going slowly to keep things that won’t spark inflammation but will grow better gut microbiome. Protein lactose free cheese and nuts. Then only eat between 4pm and 9pm but that’s not difficult cos of having had lots of digestion problems sticking to something that stops pain retrains your mind to stay within a framework. But it’s also about building up a tolerance piece by piece but you have to get involved with managing it. My biggest surprise has been how lowering carbs and grains is actually doable and plant choices can be made accessible even to low tolerance types like me when done with a lot of personalised information about your own personal tolerance levels. I think we need that time and space to get into our personal ways in to lowering carbs as some foods will be better for some than others. But for sure non pesticide products have got to be a main standard and getting a carrot to taste like a carrot is increasingly difficult with mass produced or industrial farming. So again sourcing the right food that you can afford requires managing. But I have to say my motivations have all come because of pain and medicines not working. It would be better if motivation could be formed from good habits but however you get into the low carb no processed grain route to know it is something like the doctor says is a main foundation that really has major health impacts is a diet worth staying with particularly when there are many longevity stats to confirm it too.
Lovely conversation, I would appreciate more of the aptly named Dr. Gardner! He has such a well-nourished enthusiasm, and hits me right in my biases, which is individuality and whole foods! In fact, I think there's room for more discussion on individuality. Part of that is accessibility, not everyone can afford regular blood/stool/genetic testing like Dr. Lustgarten, so they look for what has the most appeal. It would be interesting to see a study focused on mindful eating with personal tailoring, that's what made the biggest difference for me.
If prediabetic or diabetic, then go low carb. If not, go either "lower" carb OR "lower" fat but not both. If you have a serious problem with hunger, then go lower carb and increase protein. Prioritize protein and eat nutrient dense foods. At some point, do an elimination diet to see certain foods affects your body.
Great video, thank you both so much! Hopefully correct summary with CGPT: - The question of whether there is a universal ideal diet or if it varies for individuals is raised. - Dr. Christopher Gardner, a respected nutrition scientist, suggests a foundational diet: "eat food, not too much, mostly plants." - The importance of whole foods and vegetables and the reduction of refined grains and added sugar are emphasized. - The suggestion is made that this foundational diet is agreed upon by most nutrition experts. - There is also mention of an outer core of foods, including beans, fruit, nuts, eggs, and fish, that many diets agree upon. - The idea is put forward that focusing on these core principles could resolve around 75% of nutritional issues. - The challenge of adhering to specific diets and the difficulty of prescribing exact percentages are discussed. - Emphasis is placed on the role of satiety in diet success and how individual responses to foods vary. - The video also mentions factors like life events and stress affecting diet adherence. - There is a brief discussion of the concept of respiratory quotient (RQ) and its potential relevance in diet success.
0:00: 🥦 Dr. Christopher Gardner discusses the best diet for humans and the goal of nutrition science. 7:21: 🍽 The speaker's hope is to establish a foundational diet that can be personalized based on individual preferences and needs. 10:18: 🥦 The speaker discusses the importance of maintaining a balanced diet with lower quality carbs and higher protein and fat percentages. 14:16: 🍽 The speaker discusses the difficulty of following a specific diet plan and calculating the exact percentages of macronutrients. 17:37: 📚 Participants in the study were encouraged to make significant changes to lower their cravings or weight, and then adjust their intake based on their personal preferences and goals. 21:06: 📚 The video discusses why some people are able to stick to extreme diets and if it is due to discipline or metabolic differences. 24:18: 🍳 The speaker discusses the satiating effect of cheesy eggs and the impact of stress on eating habits. 27:44: 📊 Continuous glucose monitoring is helping us learn more about individual needs and preferences when it comes to diet and insulin expression. Recap by Tammy AI
I'm glad that you brought up adherence. Very important. I once saw that many doctors recommend the Mediterranean Diet, not just because it's healthy, but because it has been found that it's easier to stick to. It's also family and budget friendly (my conclusions) I was surprised to hear him talk about how some people in the study didn't eat the food that was delivered to them. Maybe it was too much trouble for them to cook?
When I had followed diets, the most satiating one for me was 40% carb, 30%, protein, and 30% fat. By doing that I had also learned approximately what the portions looks like of those different elements on a plate of food and it’s pretty much matched, a palms worth of proteins, approximately 2/5 volume of starch, and the rest of the plate covered with raw and cooked vegetables and a piece of fruit. Sometimes I would nestle a little small bowl of yogurt in there, but it was always going to fit on one plate. Need the ironic thing is that other combinations might make me feel full, but not actually satiated. I’ve never heard of this study that Gardener is talking about, but it sounds brilliant to me. In the meantime, I have become a coach for people who are trying to overcome binge eating. I’m not a nutritionist so I can’t really guide them that way, but I do think I know something about satiety and whatever food plan they come up with, I tell them that they should give themselves permission to experiment with different ratios, and that it might change over time. People just have to get over the idea that they want it over with in 12 weeks.
Great video! Thank you! I love the way Dr. Gardner frames, or encircles, choices from the inner core of whole food + veg + no refined grains or added sugars all the way out to the outer rim (for you Star Wars fans ;) of dairy & red meat. Thanks again!
I think one of the unmentioned factors in satiety is the large variability in gastric emptying time. It's my understanding that is one of the mechanism of action of the GLP and GIP-1 medications like mounjauro and wegovy. They dramatically slow down gastric emptying so you fill up quicker, eat less and feel full hours longer. If you have a hungry brain due to differences in incretin hormones, then these meds can be a game changer.
Hormonal differences in individuals and as a consequence of diet, exercise (or lack thereof), genetics, and pathology (see- insulin resistance) are what make the studies 'hard'. But it's ultimately the thing all of us are most interested in 'solving' for ourselves. For sure medications can plug that gap and make that which was not sustainable, possible. I'm not convinced it's a great long-term solution for anyone but big pharma, but it does get to the heart of much of what was being discussed here at the individual level for mass studies (and why they are both hard to stick to and tend to merge together, but while there are still outlier individuals in all cohorts).
The satiety question is a funny one as the answer might not be the same during someone's life. For instance: I got used to low carb and some other context changed so my most satiating food switched from "cheesy egg" to "low fat oats" at a certain point. Nowadays I would even say that if I eat a balanced combination of the two foods together in one meal I would feel the most satiated. (Calories equal) Even from day to day this could change a bit. Some days I get more satiety from high fat foods or high carb foods and visa versa. This seems to be correlated to activity level on the previous days, but also sleep quality and quantity in my case at least. In conclusion: The "perfect" diet might not even be static if it even exists for an individual. Imo
Dr. Gardner is excellent, thanks. People who even think about eating healthy, on a regular basis, are the only ones who stand a chance to fix their diet. Only people who have a mindset change on food will become healthier. I believe the real roadblock is each person's accepted viewpoint on foods now, which is influenced very heavily by media. The very fact that people participate in these TH-cam videos means they are on the right path, but more needs to be done for most people. There needs to be media information to passively, slowly change their viewpoints over time, countering commercialism.
That is what I always tell everybody: the quality/source of the food is what matters and having a variety in your list of foods. Whole foods, natural/organic, pasture raised, grass fed etc. is what you want to eat. And not too much of anything, not too much fat or too many carbs or too much protein. Keep a good balance amd mix things up regularly.
Brilliant video! I love your channel. Not that I’m good at complying, I do believe that a whole food diet is best for us. It’s natural. I went on the Hay Diet years ago. Aside from the separating protein and acid fruits from carbohydrates and sweet fruits, one of the things promoted was natural food. Butter not margarine etc…. I felt really fit and healthy. My cellulite went! I had a healthy glow. I think it was more to do with the abundance of whole foods and lack of processed foods that contributed to that. We are what we eat. We wouldn’t put inferior fuel in our cars, so why would we put inferior food in our bodies?? I’d eat both the oats and fruit as well as the cheesy eggs by the way. Both look delicious to me!! Like Dr Gardner (he’s got some great racing bling there!), I’m an athlete so food is fuel to me. It’s a bonus that it tastes good!! 😋
I am interested in the aspect of habit-forming. Yes, genetics are a factor, but what role does habit play in feeling satiated after a meal? And are there studies that look at the psychological level of habit-building, in terms of ways that you might “reprogram” your habits and what makes you feel full/satiated after eating something that would previously have left you hungry? Is it habit or is it genetics that makes you predisposed to a certain diet?
Habit, genetics, bugs? We have +/- 2kg (4+ pounds) of good bugs in our digestive system, linked to our brains. We can live on a wider range of foods than many animals because of this biome.. Only firm conclusion, so far, is they thrive on a wide variety of unprocessed food. (Poop samples are now part of many nutrition studies - this is relatively new.)
I love this so much. My head is spinning from watching both vegan and carnivore diets because they both appear to make sense since the videos are done in a vacuum and only present facts that confirm their personal biases.
@@EmilyTienne thanks for the reply :) Yeah I saw he did a video on him recently. I'm worried when so many of these channels make claims and never give substantial evidence, or miss the mark completely. We're lucky to have Gil in this space. Hopefully his channel blows up. More people need this knowledge and information. I hope you have a good day 😊👌🏻
Yes...and some people stress some about phytates and nutrition blockers...wash it properly soak it properly and all of your problems are gone right there.
Unfortunately I think longevity is very genetic. However by eating well, excercising, and limiting vices you can live to your full potential. Just be careful that in your quest to live long you dont forget to also live well.
The only thing that makes me so sad about all this is that no matter what diet video, they don't seem to approve of white rice. White rice is a staple of like 4 billion people. Are we all just dumb?
As much as I am with you on that there’s one explanation that does make sense - these 4 billion ppl genetically adjusted to this rating it for hundreds of years whereas for the rest of us it was introduced quite recently 🤷🏻♂️
Actually, white rice is not a staple food since that long. Only nobility / wealthy people could afford it for a long time. And since white rice took the place of whole rice in main population, diabetes became an issue in asian countries, too (check the research on diabetes in china for example). But, if you eat rice with lots of veggies and lean protein / beans / soy, I guess it is still balanced enough. While if you eat mostly white rice with little on the side... what most people do... you get higher rates of diabetes. The main reason now white rice is prefered is its shelflife (virtually forever consumable while whole rice lasts for about 6 months). Not because it is traditionally eaten.
You hear a lot of these high fat keto people being physically repulsed with the thought of eating more butter soaked steak, they just want some pasta... But then tout the "satiating abilities" of high fat to their weight loss.
@@michelangelobuonarroti916yeah, phrasing "eating for pleasure" as a bad thing makes me envision eating as a joyless, utilitarian task. That's not at all appealing to me. I love food, I love eating, and the prospect of eating being just a means of fueling my body is very sad. I like your phrasing better :)
Once again I am more confused than enlightened. I think you have a real challenge with demonstrating conclusions and summaries. Consider perhaps providing clear takeaways and summaries at the end of your videos, especially when you give them a click bait title.
Yes, this guest just jumped around so much without developing anything. All sound bites and lots of hand gestures and the Cheshire cat smile: so annoying.
I find it hard to believe that my friends and family - that know I’m on a low sugar/carb no crap diet - brought me candies and sugar cookies and sugar pies and cakes and oh brother. I couldn’t believe all the low quality candy crap - and baked goods - I had shoved in my face the last few days.
Even though I'm vegan, I've always thought the ideal diet is WFPB with fish low on the food chain such as Sardines, maybe Salmon and also Bivalves. I don't think adding anything else is beneficial for health and is just for preference.
Yes, I did find that a little odd. Maybe I have to listen again for some missing nuance or context that I didn't pick up the first time. But I don't think so.
@@ritamorim100 Mostly whole foods like nuts, seeds and avocados. Sometimes olive oil and some vegan dark chocolate, and some vegan "butter". Coconut oil to pop my pop corn :-). (Algae oil as a supplement.)
I agree meeting the macro-nutrient percents isn't reasonable but having a different structure is easier but still difficult for most people. They revert. They remain unhealthy. More food counseling is necessary and that takes one-on-one with dieticians and food logging; the first costs money and the second is avoided by most people. So personally, my philosophy is that we need more counseling like is given by Mcdougall's program or the way Esselstyn has in his program.
I'm on a low carb diet eating mostly one meal a day. And for me, I feel no cravings. So it's very easy to stay on it. But it's very interesting that low fat can be a good alternative for some people. As long as you stick to whole foods. It's a very interesting topic.
My biggest takeaway from this discussion is that there is no such thing as a perfect test for nutrition. Unless you have your test subjects locked away for years and they only receive what you feed them, then the data will be skewed. And even if everything were perfect, the differences in people's physiological makeup will skew the results as well.
@@Dan16673 Although in many studies, the food frequency questionnaires are periodically validated through measures such as measuring specific biomarkers. In the best cases, FFQs are predictive of various facets of one’s health status. Also, some cohorts, such as health professionals, are better than others in their FFQ reporting.
That's because Blue Zone studies are designed terribly and do not meet the requirements for scientific rigor. Mostly mechanistic speculation without the needed outcome based data from quality studies in humans.
They don't speak about it because it doesn't exist. There are individual studies of people within what is called the Blue Zone, but no such thing as a Blue Zone Study. One example is the 7th Day Adventist studies that have been going on for decades.
Wow that was so insightful, the doctor was so well spoken and got his ideas through very eloquently. I would love to read some of his research. Thank you for the information
Low carb is the most studied and obviously beneficial diet for humans. A lot of people just don’t do it correctly. It’s clear to me he hasn’t run the experiments himself because hitting these macro percentages is super basic a easy. There’s a week or two educational portion then tweaking from there.
I am still confused. Doesnt all the bluezones eat predominantly plant based? They have the highest average lifespan? Also vegans has the lowest BMI of all the groups? Why isnt lifespan the most important indicator of the best diet? From what I understand the bluezones eat a high carb low protein diet?
Yes to all based on most data. Lifespan and quality of the life you live which longest lived populations tend to have both. But from what I understand researchers are still looking at genetics and how our individual microbiomes adapt. Video by U of California on how we process drugs based on our microbiota. Good independent science always builds on past studies and never afraid to question what is accepted. Knowledge is based on the past. There maybe no best diet for billions of us but we do share 98.5-99% DNA (that we know to date.) I hope we evolve past sides, labels and chasing profit to focus on cooperation vs competition to advance science for all humans. We’re def not there. Until then think critically independently and use your instincts. (FWIW background is nutritional science but w/respect not equal to those in video).✌️
Great interview. There is something that is bugging me though. In the 1999 to 2016 study about macronutriment content of the US diet, what is shown is that the proportions of each macro (and macro "type" aka crappy carbs vs good carbs or saturated vs unsaturated fat) have stayed relatively stable. The only macro that is slightly but significantly decreasing seems to be the crappy carbs. That being said and correct me if I am wrong: it seems that cardiovascular & metabolic diseases are on the rise, but the study suggests that the macro profile of the average american diet have not changed for 20 years except for the % of crappy carbs going slightly down. Therefore: how to explain the rise in cardio and metabolic diseases ? Is it that we are just starting to see the people who started this poor diet 20 years ago getting sick or might it be unrelated to diet ? Maybe the rise is rather due to sedentarity, lack of PA. My point is not that those two facts (rise in diseases & steady macro profile over 20 years) show that diet is not important just that it does not seem to be able to explain the increase in disease (unless maybe the people from 20 years ago are only just starting to get sick today?).
more sedentary lives with more or less the same, poor diet gets my vote. others blame the addition of HFCS in the 70s in the US as part of US-ag policy to subsidize corn production. But I think that's the tail wagging the dog- cheap food additive as refined carbs going into everything we eat (bumping up the 'crap carbs' % you see being relatively flat in the data presented). Then we had that 'fat is the enemy' phase in the 80s and 90s which was a total boondoggle as obseity rates and metabolic/cardiovascular disease rates continued to climb upwards, in lock-step with our average waist-lines.
From what I understood is that the recommendations were basically the same throughout the years, not that people actually ate them. Science has not really change that much in view of nutrition throughout the years, if only people would listen and follow what is recommended, so you see people doing otherwise and then even the USDA, I think has changed the food pyramid many times, where at one point they were stressing very low fat, and all these companies started producing a proliferation of low fat or fat free foods that was full of sugar. People started gaining weight. But that was not science, science was basically still telling people to eat whole foods, mostly plants but some protein, but people were not following that
Not necessarily hard to eplain. Psychological stress is proven to be paramount in cardiovascular disease (via stress hormones and blood pressure etc) and cancer and pretty much all disease that isn't genetically determined (a vast minority of all diseases). Diet is likely vastly over estimated vis a vis psychology in this regard..
My ancestors have both been in guiness book of world records for longevity, living well over 100 years old, my grandma died at 101 and my grandfather at 98. They always told me to balance everything in life, dont be strict and rigid in what you eat...but only eat whole foods (not processed). They are Japanese and only ate pizzas a few times a year, and it is always home made with ingredients grown in the backyard or from local farmers. 99% of the time we eat asian food, meat rarely...lots of tofu and veggies...fruit for dessert, very little seasonings...almost no oil (used water instead).
Also they kept their mind active, my grandparents played video games on the pc my husband built them...they laughed a lot...and went for walks every day...they LOVE animals and sees them as a great blessing. They really stressed on BALANCE to me and my brothers, or ying and yang!
@@happyapple4269 Because it's not healthy in large amounts
nutrition changed , as did health in the Okinawan pop. - the longest-lived historical population we know probably - from the 1950s to present day. 1950s was probably the optimal.
Japanese have longest lifespan in the world. If humans should be looking at diet inspiration from any culture, it should be the Japanese
@@happyapple4269 Not necessarily. Depends on type of meat, and also meat is generally correlated to higher mortality
@@ApexRevolution for most of the world and in human history, it's also expensive and harder to acquire than things that don't run away.
I have no credentials but I've had a Venn diagram in my head for twenty five years. I noticed the overlap of the two main diet camps which is (just as he said) to eat vegetables and whole foods, don't eat added sugar and processed grains, so that's where I've lived. I'm now 90 percent whole food plant based, but the "whole food" part is as important to me as the "plant" part. I would sooner eat a piece of fish with a salad in a traditional restaurant than an oily, pasta based meal with no beans in a vegan restaurant.
Why do you put the word "Vegan" in scare quotes? Do you think those restaurants aren't really vegan? Why are they not vegan?
@@moondog7694 No, I completely expect vegan restaurants to be vegan.but, from my experience, I don't expect them to be "healthy." I guess quotes should be around the qualifier, if I used it. Thanks for pointing that out. It's very frustrating for me because I live in a major city and anytime a new vegan restaurant opens, I get excited , hoping I can get a healthy plant based meal, but invariably, the menu is a far cry from whole food. These restaurants cater to ethical vegans who are looking for fun foods. I get it, but it's not what I'm looking for. And the few vegan restaurants that offered whole, plant options that included beans, vegetables, whole intact grains and a dressing made from seeds, are going out of business, one by one. I patronized a few of these for twenty years. Now they're gone. Nowhere for health conscious plant based eaters to dine. It seems the processed vegan movement has overtaken the vegan health movement.
@@sectionalsofa very sad, my favorite restaurants are healthy whole food based vegan restaurants. There's one near where I live and thankfully it does good business.
@@queengoblin I live in NYC and there once were a number of them. One was amazing. I guess they could't afford the rent. Now, there are only two restaurants that I know of that serve at least one truly wfpb dish (like a Buddha bowl) but they're not great places. And honestly, from what I've seen, I think it's just a matter of time till they go under too. :(
Same here. I have taken the best from the different food tribes and am very happy with what I have come up with.
Now I am at the point of small tweaks now and then as I learn more.
It's so refreshing to see realistic, science based, non-extreme nutrition information on TH-cam. It seems like 90% of the nutritional information on TH-cam is focused on about 5% of the population at the extreme ends of the spectrum.
True, but those extremes are the videos that draw the most eyes which in turn prompts TH-cam to promote them more, and it snowballs further from there. Nuanced thought doesn't play very well in an economically incentivized environment like this.
lazy people are usually the most unhealthy and lazy people don't want to put effort into getting healthier so these fad diets like vegan or carnivore get the most popularity for sponsoring "this one trick to get healthy". lazy people swallow that faster than mcdonalds.
lazy people are also the largest part of youtube audience, where these fad diets are promoted.
GPT4 Summary:
The video features a discussion with Dr. Christopher Gardner, a nutrition scientist at Stanford University. Here are the key takeaways:
1. **Foundational Diet**: Dr. Gardner emphasizes the importance of a foundational diet that includes more whole foods and vegetables, less refined grain, and less added sugar. He believes that most dietary approaches, even those at polar opposites like keto and low-fat vegan, agree on this foundation. He suggests that if people could focus on these four aspects, it would resolve about 75% of nutritional issues.
2. **Individual Differences**: He acknowledges that individuals respond differently to diets. Some people thrive on certain diets while others don't. He believes that this could be due to differences in satiety responses to different foods, microbiomes, and metabolic factors.
3. **Quality of Carbs**: He discusses the importance of the quality of carbohydrates in the diet. He suggests that replacing low-quality carbs with high-quality ones could lead to better health outcomes. He also mentions that protein intake tends to remain consistent across different diets.
4. **Adherence to Diets**: Dr. Gardner talks about the difficulty of adhering to strict diets in real-world settings. He mentions that in his studies, participants were encouraged to find a balance in their diet that they could maintain in the long term, rather than trying to strictly adhere to a specific percentage of macronutrients.
5. **Personalized Nutrition**: He discusses the potential of personalized nutrition, where diets are tailored to individual needs and preferences. He suggests that while a foundational diet is important, there is room for personalization based on factors like satiety responses, microbiome differences, and metabolic factors.
6. **Impact of Life Events**: He mentions that life events can significantly impact a person's ability to stick to a diet. He suggests that during stressful times, being part of a study or maintaining a certain diet can provide a sense of control.
7. **Future Research**: Dr. Gardner expresses interest in further research to understand what explains the variability in how people respond to different diets. He mentions factors like satiety, the microbiome, and respiratory quotient (a measure of metabolic rate and the mix of fuels being used by the body) as potential areas of exploration.
How did you make this summary?
This was much more understandable than the video to me…
Yeah, 5 mins in and he hasn’t said anything useful. Thanks for the summary to save me 20 minutes of nothing special.
Excellent!! Thank you so much!🙏🏻💗
When talking about nutrition, even though this is not an obligation for scientists, I think it's important to take into account also how compatilble a diet is for most of the population. This envolves economics and ethnicity, for instance. Most of the world cannot digest lactose, most people cannot buy good quality fish, especially sea fish. In those cases it is important to ask what are the alternatives for those foods, since guidelines are based around them
Important point.
Eggs are almost always available. And it's usually cheap.
Canned fish is also available most places.
@@oysteinsoreide4323 so does Chiken and pork.
@@bardavidson2102 chicken and pork are examples of high available foods? Or as alternative for sea fish?
Dr. Gardner looks so happy with his work. Great presentation. As a non-STEM person this is easy to understand and apply advice. Thanks
Well, STEM people are robots, so....
Dr. Gardner seems like such a wholesome guy. never heard him speak before until now. thoroughly enjoyable.
At first it takes disciplin and motivation, but later it's just habit and it becomes the thing you prefer in all ways.
I am interested in this aspect, too. Yes, genetics are a factor, but what role does habit play in feeling satiated after a meal? And are there studies that look at the psychological level of habit building, in terms of ways that one might “reprogram” one’s habits and what makes you feel full/satiated after eating something that would previously have left you hungry?
Dr Gardner's passion for his work is so pleasant to watch! This real world approach is a nice twist on nutrition. Thank you for this interview!
it's certainly a less dogmatic approach; at the same time acknowledging both the commonalities across his experience in populations as well as small differences that can lead individuals to thrive on one diet/lifestyle vs another. Connection of the statistical to the individual is quite difficult in practice, and we all are looking for the ultimate anecdotal advise- that which is applicable to a sample size of 1 (yourself).
I find it quite telling that the macros and breakdowns over the past few decades have actually remained pretty consistent, even if they are highly weighted towards crap carbs (no shock there) here in the west. My personal experience with intentional hypertrophy, is that is a dedicated effort, every day, to force yourself to consume north of 20% protein (eg- hit something like 1g protein/lb). Supplementation is basically required. I'm sure some dedicated keto and carni advocates here will pop in to disagree, but this is my lived reality.
Fascinating as always, thanks Gil!
Man, the quality of the information and discussions in this channel is top notch. This video in particular is going to be so helpful for my patients!
The point about most of these extreme diets being hard to stick to for most people, but not for some, is quite interesting to me. I find most types of food pretty tasty and don't mind repeating the same meal every day so it has been pretty easy for me to stick to "extreme" diets like HCLF and vegan keto, but I think something I was overlooking is how little benefit there actually is to going this far. All these TH-cam doctors promise you marvelous benefits to sticking to their special variation of a diet, like "curing" cancer, diabetes, heart desease, etc., and even extending life/healthspan. But in reality I imagine 90% of the benefits come from just cutting out all the processed foods & being at a healthy weight, and if you're trying to go beyond that, it quickly becomes a case of diminishing returns. Or at least, it seems like we don't currently have enough scientific evidence to support anything beyond that. And all these people trying to eke out those last 10% of benefit are the ones getting riled up every time there's a new study that comes out that didn't go extreme enough in enforcing some sort of diet.
I agree, but If science says red meat is a probable carcinogen, I think that's something to pay attention to as well.
I'm amazed people still aren't aware low-fat diets do eliminate diabetes, if the fat is dropped below 20%; some say 15%. So does low-carb(and I'm against LC diets). The reason this works is because diabetes is caused by a high mix of carbs AND fat together.
@@GaryHighFruit weird, all the ones that I know/knew (t2d) got it via carb and carb only (or mostly). All the ones getting better are either via lowerLC or keto, myself included via lowerLC...
@@rualablhor ou must be overlooking fat in their diet(maybe some hidden fat). A lot of people call junk-food "carbs", but they're about 60% fat by calories.
And 2% milk isn't 2% of calores from fat; it's 2% of weight. It's about 40% fat. Similar story with lean-meat.
@@rualablhor T2d is caused by insulin resistance caused by fat. Check out Mastering Diabetes, they can explain it perfectly.
This a very fascinating as well as the most comprehensive discussion I have heard (as a non-academic) about diet, nutrition, and health all packed in one place. As a retired scientist in my 70'ies, (Ph.D. in material science), find such discussions and information priceless. As we are living at a time where there is total information overload at the speed of light, it is so helpful to have such content that is credible and worth more than all the books I can read in a year to extract the core information I need to make personal health decisions.
This is probably the best video about nutrition on youtube and I've watched more then enough over 10 years.
Having binged on TH-cam nutrition videos for about three months, I have to say this is the single most informative and entertaining one I've come across. Thank you for pulling so much together.
Can you please summarise the information for me please in a simple way? I have a hard time understanding because of my impairment.
@@burger101ful Dr. Gardner emphasizes the importance of a foundational diet that includes more whole foods and vegetables, less refined grain, and less added sugar.
@@brandywillis3998 thank you for taking the time to reply
I say this over and over again, you don't have to focus on cutting calories. Focus on eating more whole foods. Whole foods are already naturally lower in calories.
In my experience satiety changes. But yes, in my transition to a healthier diet, I first went for more nuts - to replace junkier foods I had in my diet & deal with cravings. I eat a lot less of those nuts now, because the cravings are gone. So I do think a change mindset is crucial. When transitioning to a healthier diet: swap unhealthy processed foods for healthier plant based foods - that work for you right now. And then when you're at something stable that works, you can start tweaking, because baseline has changed.
Couldn't agree more. 🙂
Coherent talk from Dr. Gardner. He boils all the various diet discourses down to a simple common foundation: eliminate sugar and refined flour (bad carbs) and tinker with good fats, protein and low carbs to suit your own metabolic traits. Thanks Gil for having this guest.
That tells me one diet doesn’t fit all.
Thanks for this. Maybe I won't even listen now... I binge on this stuff too much already.
Thanks for summing it up as when they said the last 50 yrs, im like diets were shit then, they invented Betty Crocker. They need to address addictions, religions lots of work to do and learn were just a young planet of biology and Stardust.
BWT Them examples of that fancy word "satiation" I looked at the food examples and would select 2 Oats and Blueberries looks delicious and appealing wish I would have 3 squares x 2 a day. Peace.
"... tinker with good fats, protein and low carbs ..."
Low-carb community: we've been telling you since 1920!
This dude is so insanely refreshing. I LOVE his vibe.
Riigghhtt???
The more I read about nutrition, the more confusion and division there is. What I discovered is there are some basic principles in most diets, regarding food quality. So I'm glad I'm on the right track with that.
I followed a low carb diet for 20 months which is very similar to what Dr. Gardner described, basically I eat everything except refined carbs and added sugar. I lost 20kg (about 44 pounds) in the first year (75kg - 55kg) without ever starving (except fasting on purpose occasionally). I was prediabetic with high blood pressure now all symptoms are gone. In fact I make sure to be full every meal. I eat whenever I want and may have 1, 2, or 3 meals a day, but mostly 2 meals a day. My GF and I taught many friends and relatives (including a buddihst monk) to do this and many of them succeeded as well. We use simliar approach by telling them cut carbs by half then another half, or have no carb days, or keep a ball park percentage, and eat whole foods to their perference, meat, fish, vegetables, etc. We also eat a lot of kefir, kombucha, sauerkraut, etc. that we made ourselves. Our menu are pretty flexible, we change the proportin of meat, fish, eggs and vegetables to our liking. We limit sweet fruits and foods with refined carbs and sugar by feel. It's not hard and doesn't need much dicipline. We made it a life style. We ended up eating more protein and a lot more vegetables on average (but fewer meals in total). Exercise and sleep also matter but that's another story.
My body reacts great to Mediterranean Keto, in fact I thrive on it. I don’t demonize carbs, in fact once a month or so I will carb cycle and hit some favourites. I miss carb dense foods less and less each cycle, as I taste more the actual flavors (or lack of). This holiday I ate some of my old favourites and just missed the great foods I’m on with Keto. The Whole Foods, and non-processed foods. I get all my macros and vitamins from my diet and look forward to each meal.
@@RogueCylon yes, same here. I enjoy each meal a lot more than before. I hardly miss carb foods while I could have them more liberally after a workout or hike, or when tasting local delicacies. I'm adding back a little more fruits and eploring exotic ways to cook rice and flour, such as turkish style rice with many spices, kefir raised dough, etc. There are so many things to experiment with.
So what do you consider as carbs ? Because I eliminated gluten, sugars, meat, but still don't feel good. But maybe I have other underlining conditions that might affect my wellbeing. I've got an anxiety disorders, which also affects my overall health.
@@8964-Winnie-Poo sounds like we are on a similar journey. Carbs have a place, highly processed carbs do not. I love trying new foods, and different nationalities. So when I want to carb cycle, I will say go to my favourite Indian restaurant (Himalayan actually as the family I trust), and they will on request cook my food in Ghee. I will enjoy Naan, Papads and lentils. I love Asian, Mediterranean (Spanish, Turkish, Greek, Italian) food, as well as French, and Portuguese. I love cooking, and my wife is an amazing cook. So we rarely do any processed foods now. If I want a simple healthy meal to break fast, one of my favourites is something I put together - chopped in a bowl Olives, Sweet Red Peppers, Pickled Cucumbers, Pickled Beets, Aged Goat and Sheep Cheese, or blue cheese, macadamia and Brazil nuts, some protein, often Italian made aged Prosciutto. Small batch fresh pressed EVOO, and ACV. I love it and never get bored of enjoying every morsel.
@@andymanland for anxiety, go out have more sun and exercise. I had it and got rid of it partly by doing extreme sports. If you feel depressed, go out and walk or jog, take a cold shower, watch horror movies, go for a bungee jump or sky diving, run a marathon, read good books. Get yourself stimulated.
Exciting to see two of my favorite nutrition experts talk to each other. There is so much reasoned sanity here in a wider field full of strident screaming matches. People don’t want to hear that the answer can hing on, “well, it depends.” The human diet has been so varied over a million years that it’s absurd to think that there is one, perfect diet. The message Drs. Gil and Chris deliver is that, while diet is important, and there are foundational concepts, stop stressing about it so much.
The human diet has not been that varied over millions of years. Pre agriculture (10,000 years ago) and before homo sapiens left Africa (60,000 years ago), we ate a pretty simple diet of meat and fruit.
Maybe some occasional bugs and bark during famine, but definitely not more variety than most other species of animal.
@@oloblish Omnivores, as humans are, must be opportunists and use what's available, therefore your statement lacks common sense. Besides, there have been archeological finds from different locations with different results. One depended upon carbs from tubers and the like while others seemed to lean more on game. Food sources would vary considerably depending upon location and season. The fruit season would be limited a few months a year. Live near water and they ate fish. Inland, not. Etc. Etc.
Why are you conveniently missing out the fact we've been eating starch/tubers for 100,000 years?
@@Nicksonian Indeed, the key to our success as a species is precisely our adaptability in our available food resources. The very fact that we have both ketogenic and glucongenic pathways is a testament to this fact (as is more and more of the paleo-archaeological record).
@@bensmalley6357fun fact! The oldest direct evidence we have of cooked food is a tuber! You can imagine how valuable a high-energy, quick-release food like that would be when you're on the move. The particular tuber in question though does taste pretty bad
This was so fun to watch because of Dr. Gardner's enthusiasm. 😊
Totally sane! But it would be good to have a definition of a low quality carb. Sure table sugar and cake is bad but if i make a veggie Bolognese and have it with a good quality Italian pasta it doesn't FEEL like bad carbs. On the other hand I skip the entire bread aisle at the supermarket because what is sold as even whole grain bread there is actually cake!
Thanks for having such an esteemed guest. The professor's lecture of the various types of studies in nutrition is easily the best I have seen. It's two hours long but filled with excellent information and has solid, basic information in nutrition.
Being wfpb, I'll admit I'm stuck in my camp to a degree, but I understand his philosophy, which may make the biggest difference across the population. He's targeting most people as opposed to the strictest but healthiest diet, but this is also a downside of what Nathan Pritikin calls "Maximum Compliance; Minimum Effectiveness". If most people can eliminate low quality carb as he recommends, and then up the high quality carbs, that will make a tremendous difference and it is in agreement with my theory that low fiber intake is the biggest problem to be solved, which is done by increasing high quality carbs.
In my little world of whole food-plant based I have improvements to make like carefully measuring salt in the shaker daily; I'm far from perfect myself.
I really need to go to bed but I can't stop watching your videos. I"m really impressed with how you're explaining all the confusing information out there. Really Awesome!
Happy with the core diet, but if you have digestive problems, it is worth cutting back to a really simple diet then gradually adding things back in to check if you are allergic or sensitive to something. Gluten, wheat and lactose are the commonest such items, but other specific things like peppers, mushrooms, onions etc affect some people.
so use your common sense
I think a lot of people need to learn to stop being scared of farting occasionally and learning that it is a sign of a healthy microbiome.
This should be taught in childhood
I wish I could always be as cheerful as this wonderful grandfather!
Great discussion from two of my favorite nutritional experts. Nuts & seeds in a large salad (which I have daily) work well for me for satiety.
Dr. Gardner is refreshing and insightful. But most importantly, he's realistic. Great interview!
This is the best conversation about nutrition I have seen anywhere. Thank you for this.
This is the best and most believable talk on food choices that I have ever heard. Very practical and balanced.
Christopher is my favorite in the health and nutrition space.
Great information and so down to earth. Dr. Gardner seems so genuine and happy, I’d listen to him talk about anything.
I don't know why but dr. Gardner explaining the foundational diet just made everything so clear to me.
You must be easily impressed. I thought he was jumping around and never got to the point.
@@jm08050No, I didn't feel that way at all. He is basically saying everything in moderation, but concentrate on quality foods.
Could not stop smiling through out this talk..finally hearing info that reflects reality. Good advice that is helpful..Been frantic dealing with all the contradictory info coming from all directions.
I am so grateful that someone on an Instagram post sent me here. I experience chronic illness and I have two groups of friends telling me the opposite things. One side is vegan and the other carnivore 🤦🏻♀️ My comment was how do I discern the truth cuz you can find tons of so called nutritional videos that attempt to prove that their camp is the ONLY camp
I actually do get over 50% of my calories from carbs (it's roughly 55/30/15 carbs/fat/protein), and the only refined grain I eat is Grape Nuts Flakes (which I eat for the vitamin B-12, as I'm a vegan and every b-12 supplement I've tried makes my face breakout). That is unless you count whole durum wheat couscous, which I think is still considered a whole grain? But anyway 3g of added sugar in the Grape Nuts Flakes and 0 in the couscous, and 9g of dietary fiber between them. That's the only added sugar in my diet. I also eat a half cup of steel cut Quaker Oats every day as well, but that's definitely a whole grain. I'm one of those weirdos who eats the exact same thing day in and day out, with only the occasional exception, so we do exist haha. I've just chosen foods that work for me where I can eat them day after day. I guess my diet would fall under the LLQC umbrella. Anyway great video as usual.
I have been vegetarian for 13 years and vegan for ~7 years. I stopped consuming eggs 15-16 years ago and pigs 15 years ago. I just disliked eggs, where they come from, what they represent and the smell. Then all of it became an ethical and moral issue for me, so I switched to plant-based diet and vegan life style. I have never went plant-based for my health, which I think is important to state.
I was not really into healthy way of eating. I do not measure how much of anything am I putting into my body. People are the ones who made me feel anxious by constantly claiming that I am going to die, that my teeth will fall out etc.
But, the opposite has happened. The last time I had a tooth problem was 9 years ago. Since then, I am just going for a regular check-up. That is weird because my teeth were never really a high quality.
I started having enormous headaches at the age of 14. Two years into vegetarianism I have noticed that intensity has dropped. Once I went plant-based, they stopped. Now, I do have them once in a couple of months - which is nothing compared to what I used to have.
My stomach does not hurt after the meals. It used to be bloated.
My period pain has decreased in intensity. I still have them but I am not ending up in hospitals.
With all that said, I wonder how much better would it all be if I actually took care of what I was eating, which is what I have decided to do now. Veganism helped me to get off refined sugar because there are not many vegan sweets out there. :D
I would really like to know more about the dairy and breast cancer link. I read a lot of studies, but it is never enough. Thx.
I want to echo the sentiment of the OP, though I went from vegetarian (27 yrs) to vegan (7 yrs ago) for health reasons to improve my struggle with Type 1 diabetes. This actually worked very well - and lead to other, unexpected improvements (incl insights to animal rights :-) ).
What I miss in reports on this channel is connecting the dots - how changing eating habits affect the environment (= OUR LIVING CONDITIONS !!) which in turn affects our lifestyle which reflects on our health.
Sadly, academics' tunnel vision, and the quest for neat, easy to present reports, defeats the goal of advocating for whole-some living. It's not about *this or that factor* but about how it all plays out *together* and how we can achieve the necessary balance. A vegan WFPB lifestyle ticks all those boxes, IMO
And a lot of ex-vegans would've found the same light at the end of the tunnel if they weren't scared off.
Check out the book The China Study
I chose a low-carb diet as I could just pack away carbs, so every time I eat a diet with carbs, I just craved more. I think when I reach my goals, I will reintroduce carb in a small amount. I was 336lb now. I am now 289lb, so I have a way to go, but I would say that for the first time in my life, I have an understanding on how to eat in a way that suits my body and not use food as a crutch.
I love this doctor! He knows his stuff. Most realistic nutritional interview I have seen on youtube,
What he said about the refined carbs was mind blowing, we just don’t realize how much of it we eat. But the problem I find with the mainstream recommendations that we see today is that they conflate these refined carbs with regular ones, which are super healthy, and they try to replace them with protein, which is also not all the same, since that coming from meat comes with a lot more junk. They just say cut the carbs bump up the protein, and that ends up being cutting the fruits and veggies, potatoes, beans, and bumping up the meats, which are mostly saturated fats anyway.
Exactly, it's crazy, but so common!
Spot on analysis!
Saturated fat is good tho
@@ajesfrost3980 if you wanna have a heart attack or a stroke, it’s great for that!
@@hugomarquez3189 in pretty sure its a myth that all cholesterol is bad. Your body needs it to make hormones and build cells
This has been MOST helpful! My experience has been modifying my diet 1 element for a month, see how it changes, then keep/revert it and move on to another item. I've found that some food changes that work for me don't work for my wife and vice versa, while sometimes the same change affects us equally. I.e. our needs are a little different but mostly the same, and the lesson we learned was that follow a diet that works best for us. And neither of us have ever followed any popular, generalized diets, but the closest would be the Mediterranean diet.
Eating healthy food,walking a lot,reduced stress,making fun and having healthy social life is mandatory to be healthy as well as to live longer.
Per what he was saying near the beginning about the low fat vs low carb diet, I got a DNA test for varied reasons related to health and one of the things I was told was that I show a genetic predisposition to need a low fat, higher carb diet. Which, before I was told that, I had already tried a higher fat keto diet and a lower fat keto diet, as well as eating primarily kitchari (but, sometimes still having a doughnut or some meat) and living for about a week and a half mostly following the advice of Dr. McDougall with a little Ornish advice thrown in, but still eating prefab burritos. Low fat keto diet worked great, as long as I did intermittent fasting AND had sudden bouts of eating candy, corn chips or rice. That sort of thing. I lost so much weight, felt great, gut was hurting so much less. Kitchari die worked great. Did not lose much weight but some even though I was eating 4 times a day and my gut felt better than on any keto diet. The week and a half of McDougall (basically) I lost 32 lbs and a lot of it was toxic waste. I was full of energy, definitely was burning fat. And, then I experimented and found if I had a little coconut milk the weight loss sllowed down but did not stop. If I had meat, the weight loss slowed down. If I had more processed food than the prefab burrito or two, the weight loss slowed down. If I had any significant portion of meat or processed food or fat, the weight loss stopped ead in its track and if I combined them, I would gain weight and my gut would start hurting again, so bad, and al the old bathroom problems would start. So, I learned a lot. I also learned that when people started nagging at me to invite people over and make them a real dinner, then the weight loss slowed down or even turned into weight gain and I had more cravings.
I have no point other than to share information in case someone finds it helpful to know.
Micheal Pollans' words keep ringing true
Wow! What a handsome doctor!
Beautiful skin, would love to know his skin care routine.
This upbeat communication style is easy to listen to thus it holds the attention.
I completely disagree. His style - with all the exaggerated hand gestures - is so off-putting and so 70s.
I agree. What a pleasure.
Ditto
Great talk with Christopher! He is such a cheerful person, i really enjoying your conversations.
My vegetarian-mostly-diet uses a delicious mushroom and onion-based in oil/water base to which I add all kinds of other vegrtables including legumes (which are cooked separately to remove gas issue and then added fro the fridge) with more water. Add and simmer. Add salt and pepper and herbs. Make it delicious. 60, 62kg, 1m70. Play sport daily. Non-smoker/non-drinker.
Boring life
@@carlyndolphinno kidding
I am 55yrs and have ulcerative colitis and then changes from menopause but recently realised I was avoiding fibre and depending on carbs as avoidance for other foods. I didn’t know you can change your ability to digest fibre if you do it incrementally and know the difference between soluble and insoluble. I have just really changed around and really low carb like a gluten free wrap a day. Now just plant based certain plants only going slowly to keep things that won’t spark inflammation but will grow better gut microbiome. Protein lactose free cheese and nuts. Then only eat between 4pm and 9pm but that’s not difficult cos of having had lots of digestion problems sticking to something that stops pain retrains your mind to stay within a framework. But it’s also about building up a tolerance piece by piece but you have to get involved with managing it. My biggest surprise has been how lowering carbs and grains is actually doable and plant choices can be made accessible even to low tolerance types like me when done with a lot of personalised information about your own personal tolerance levels. I think we need that time and space to get into our personal ways in to lowering carbs as some foods will be better for some than others. But for sure non pesticide products have got to be a main standard and getting a carrot to taste like a carrot is increasingly difficult with mass produced or industrial farming. So again sourcing the right food that you can afford requires managing. But I have to say my motivations have all come because of pain and medicines not working. It would be better if motivation could be formed from good habits but however you get into the low carb no processed grain route to know it is something like the doctor says is a main foundation that really has major health impacts is a diet worth staying with particularly when there are many longevity stats to confirm it too.
Lovely conversation, I would appreciate more of the aptly named Dr. Gardner! He has such a well-nourished enthusiasm, and hits me right in my biases, which is individuality and whole foods!
In fact, I think there's room for more discussion on individuality. Part of that is accessibility, not everyone can afford regular blood/stool/genetic testing like Dr. Lustgarten, so they look for what has the most appeal. It would be interesting to see a study focused on mindful eating with personal tailoring, that's what made the biggest difference for me.
This is my favourite video of yours so far, Dr Carvalho. Excellent info!
If prediabetic or diabetic, then go low carb. If not, go either "lower" carb OR "lower" fat but not both. If you have a serious problem with hunger, then go lower carb and increase protein. Prioritize protein and eat nutrient dense foods. At some point, do an elimination diet to see certain foods affects your body.
Limbo titrate quality diet sounds a lot like intuitive eating with a nice touch of Noom. ❤️
Great video, thank you both so much!
Hopefully correct summary with CGPT:
- The question of whether there is a universal ideal diet or if it varies for individuals is raised.
- Dr. Christopher Gardner, a respected nutrition scientist, suggests a foundational diet: "eat food, not too much, mostly plants."
- The importance of whole foods and vegetables and the reduction of refined grains and added sugar are emphasized.
- The suggestion is made that this foundational diet is agreed upon by most nutrition experts.
- There is also mention of an outer core of foods, including beans, fruit, nuts, eggs, and fish, that many diets agree upon.
- The idea is put forward that focusing on these core principles could resolve around 75% of nutritional issues.
- The challenge of adhering to specific diets and the difficulty of prescribing exact percentages are discussed.
- Emphasis is placed on the role of satiety in diet success and how individual responses to foods vary.
- The video also mentions factors like life events and stress affecting diet adherence.
- There is a brief discussion of the concept of respiratory quotient (RQ) and its potential relevance in diet success.
Satiety is Key.
Could not agree more. People will keep to diet if they are satieted. Simple as.
0:00: 🥦 Dr. Christopher Gardner discusses the best diet for humans and the goal of nutrition science.
7:21: 🍽 The speaker's hope is to establish a foundational diet that can be personalized based on individual preferences and needs.
10:18: 🥦 The speaker discusses the importance of maintaining a balanced diet with lower quality carbs and higher protein and fat percentages.
14:16: 🍽 The speaker discusses the difficulty of following a specific diet plan and calculating the exact percentages of macronutrients.
17:37: 📚 Participants in the study were encouraged to make significant changes to lower their cravings or weight, and then adjust their intake based on their personal preferences and goals.
21:06: 📚 The video discusses why some people are able to stick to extreme diets and if it is due to discipline or metabolic differences.
24:18: 🍳 The speaker discusses the satiating effect of cheesy eggs and the impact of stress on eating habits.
27:44: 📊 Continuous glucose monitoring is helping us learn more about individual needs and preferences when it comes to diet and insulin expression.
Recap by Tammy AI
I'm glad that you brought up adherence. Very important. I once saw that many doctors recommend the Mediterranean Diet, not just because it's healthy, but because it has been found that it's easier to stick to. It's also family and budget friendly (my conclusions)
I was surprised to hear him talk about how some people in the study didn't eat the food that was delivered to them. Maybe it was too much trouble for them to cook?
When I had followed diets, the most satiating one for me was 40% carb, 30%, protein, and 30% fat. By doing that I had also learned approximately what the portions looks like of those different elements on a plate of food and it’s pretty much matched, a palms worth of proteins, approximately 2/5 volume of starch, and the rest of the plate covered with raw and cooked vegetables and a piece of fruit. Sometimes I would nestle a little small bowl of yogurt in there, but it was always going to fit on one plate. Need the ironic thing is that other combinations might make me feel full, but not actually satiated. I’ve never heard of this study that Gardener is talking about, but it sounds brilliant to me. In the meantime, I have become a coach for people who are trying to overcome binge eating. I’m not a nutritionist so I can’t really guide them that way, but I do think I know something about satiety and whatever food plan they come up with, I tell them that they should give themselves permission to experiment with different ratios, and that it might change over time. People just have to get over the idea that they want it over with in 12 weeks.
Which kind of fat do you recommend?
Great video! Thank you! I love the way Dr. Gardner frames, or encircles, choices from the inner core of whole food + veg + no refined grains or added sugars all the way out to the outer rim (for you Star Wars fans ;) of dairy & red meat. Thanks again!
best nutrition channel on TH-cam
absolutely love Dr. Gardner! so unbiased and real.
I think one of the unmentioned factors in satiety is the large variability in gastric emptying time. It's my understanding that is one of the mechanism of action of the GLP and GIP-1 medications like mounjauro and wegovy. They dramatically slow down gastric emptying so you fill up quicker, eat less and feel full hours longer. If you have a hungry brain due to differences in incretin hormones, then these meds can be a game changer.
Hormonal differences in individuals and as a consequence of diet, exercise (or lack thereof), genetics, and pathology (see- insulin resistance) are what make the studies 'hard'. But it's ultimately the thing all of us are most interested in 'solving' for ourselves.
For sure medications can plug that gap and make that which was not sustainable, possible. I'm not convinced it's a great long-term solution for anyone but big pharma, but it does get to the heart of much of what was being discussed here at the individual level for mass studies (and why they are both hard to stick to and tend to merge together, but while there are still outlier individuals in all cohorts).
gooosh this man is just SO NORMAL!!! THANK YOU 🙏🤍
👉 no processed foods
👉 no processed sugar
👉 eat as organically as possible 🤍
Me too, grateful
The satiety question is a funny one as the answer might not be the same during someone's life. For instance: I got used to low carb and some other context changed so my most satiating food switched from "cheesy egg" to "low fat oats" at a certain point. Nowadays I would even say that if I eat a balanced combination of the two foods together in one meal I would feel the most satiated. (Calories equal)
Even from day to day this could change a bit. Some days I get more satiety from high fat foods or high carb foods and visa versa. This seems to be correlated to activity level on the previous days, but also sleep quality and quantity in my case at least.
In conclusion: The "perfect" diet might not even be static if it even exists for an individual. Imo
Dr. Gardner is excellent, thanks. People who even think about eating healthy, on a regular basis, are the only ones who stand a chance to fix their diet. Only people who have a mindset change on food will become healthier. I believe the real roadblock is each person's accepted viewpoint on foods now, which is influenced very heavily by media.
The very fact that people participate in these TH-cam videos means they are on the right path, but more needs to be done for most people. There needs to be media information to passively, slowly change their viewpoints over time, countering commercialism.
My buddy Christopher giving off some Hank Green vibes here (in a good way).
This couldn’t have been more timely for me! Thank you
That is what I always tell everybody: the quality/source of the food is what matters and having a variety in your list of foods. Whole foods, natural/organic, pasture raised, grass fed etc. is what you want to eat. And not too much of anything, not too much fat or too many carbs or too much protein. Keep a good balance amd mix things up regularly.
Brilliant video! I love your channel. Not that I’m good at complying, I do believe that a whole food diet is best for us. It’s natural. I went on the Hay Diet years ago. Aside from the separating protein and acid fruits from carbohydrates and sweet fruits, one of the things promoted was natural food. Butter not margarine etc…. I felt really fit and healthy. My cellulite went! I had a healthy glow. I think it was more to do with the abundance of whole foods and lack of processed foods that contributed to that. We are what we eat. We wouldn’t put inferior fuel in our cars, so why would we put inferior food in our bodies?? I’d eat both the oats and fruit as well as the cheesy eggs by the way. Both look delicious to me!! Like Dr Gardner (he’s got some great racing bling there!), I’m an athlete so food is fuel to me. It’s a bonus that it tastes good!! 😋
I am interested in the aspect of habit-forming. Yes, genetics are a factor, but what role does habit play in feeling satiated after a meal? And are there studies that look at the psychological level of habit-building, in terms of ways that you might “reprogram” your habits and what makes you feel full/satiated after eating something that would previously have left you hungry? Is it habit or is it genetics that makes you predisposed to a certain diet?
Exercise(resistance training) works for me, its feel like my metabolism back to normal so i dont feel as hungry as i never exercise before
Habit, genetics, bugs? We have +/- 2kg (4+ pounds) of good bugs in our digestive system, linked to our brains. We can live on a wider range of foods than many animals because of this biome.. Only firm conclusion, so far, is they thrive on a wide variety of unprocessed food. (Poop samples are now part of many nutrition studies - this is relatively new.)
I love this so much. My head is spinning from watching both vegan and carnivore diets because they both appear to make sense since the videos are done in a vacuum and only present facts that confirm their personal biases.
So why don't you try both of them and you will see which one is better for you? If you do not try, you will never know.
@@neilnewinger3059 why even try? Both are extreme and unsustainable.
I know what the animals would want.
This is not your personal choice
@@nixpix814 Oh my body isn't my choice? Thanks vegans!
@Wendy Witchner both are restricting major macronutrients. No need for that.
I think Dr. Sten Ekberg, an Olympic decathlete & holistic doctor, who now runs a TH-cam channel, would be a fantastic guest on your channel.
Ekberg was invited but never responded, possibly due to his lack of reliance on provable facts. Gil did a critique of Ekberg in one of his videos.
@@EmilyTienne thanks for the reply :) Yeah I saw he did a video on him recently. I'm worried when so many of these channels make claims and never give substantial evidence, or miss the mark completely. We're lucky to have Gil in this space.
Hopefully his channel blows up. More people need this knowledge and information. I hope you have a good day 😊👌🏻
Dr Gil, can you talk about best blood tests/markers for health? Is it liver enzymes, metabolic markers, kidney function?
This was fascinating to watch. Thank you so much for the information. Keep up the good work!
Excellent interview.
I assume high quality carbs are things like whole foods be it grains, seeds, legumes, vegetables, potato's etc?
Yes...and some people stress some about phytates and nutrition blockers...wash it properly soak it properly and all of your problems are gone right there.
your channel is awesome man. thanks so much for the content!
What an excellent video! The simple answer seems to be eat whole foods, not too much, mostly plants.
Not really. How can he say Meatos agree to eat more fruit and veggies. Not happening!
Unfortunately I think longevity is very genetic. However by eating well, excercising, and limiting vices you can live to your full potential. Just be careful that in your quest to live long you dont forget to also live well.
I like this idea from an Italian citizen, "Yes, high quality food is expensive. Good! You don't eat too much!"
The only thing that makes me so sad about all this is that no matter what diet video, they don't seem to approve of white rice. White rice is a staple of like 4 billion people. Are we all just dumb?
As much as I am with you on that there’s one explanation that does make sense - these 4 billion ppl genetically adjusted to this rating it for hundreds of years whereas for the rest of us it was introduced quite recently 🤷🏻♂️
Actually, white rice is not a staple food since that long. Only nobility / wealthy people could afford it for a long time. And since white rice took the place of whole rice in main population, diabetes became an issue in asian countries, too (check the research on diabetes in china for example). But, if you eat rice with lots of veggies and lean protein / beans / soy, I guess it is still balanced enough. While if you eat mostly white rice with little on the side... what most people do... you get higher rates of diabetes. The main reason now white rice is prefered is its shelflife (virtually forever consumable while whole rice lasts for about 6 months). Not because it is traditionally eaten.
Just eat brown rice.
Why does Dr Gardener smile when he gives us bad news? Such a cheery chappie!
Regarding satiety, there's of course a difference between feeling bloated with bad digestion, and feeling full. But maybe some people confuse them.
You hear a lot of these high fat keto people being physically repulsed with the thought of eating more butter soaked steak, they just want some pasta... But then tout the "satiating abilities" of high fat to their weight loss.
@@rupert909 Disgust and appetite loss is great for losing weight. Just eat unhealthy things that make you feel noxious 🙂.
If you do not eat for pleasure it is actually very easy to eat pretty constant proportions for a long period of time.
Agree, but I would phrase it differently and say to avoid eating as recreation.
@@michelangelobuonarroti916yeah, phrasing "eating for pleasure" as a bad thing makes me envision eating as a joyless, utilitarian task. That's not at all appealing to me. I love food, I love eating, and the prospect of eating being just a means of fueling my body is very sad. I like your phrasing better :)
A small serving of oatmeal with eggs most days, but prepared in a variety of ways to keep it interesting.
Once again I am more confused than enlightened.
I think you have a real challenge with demonstrating conclusions and summaries.
Consider perhaps providing clear takeaways and summaries at the end of your videos, especially when you give them a click bait title.
It is designed to be less controversial and pleasing for wide audience.
Yes, this guest just jumped around so much without developing anything. All sound bites and lots of hand gestures and the Cheshire cat smile: so annoying.
one of the best videos on a balanced, sustainable diets
I find it hard to believe that my friends and family - that know I’m on a low sugar/carb no crap diet - brought me candies and sugar cookies and sugar pies and cakes and oh brother. I couldn’t believe all the low quality candy crap - and baked goods - I had shoved in my face the last few days.
Even though I'm vegan, I've always thought the ideal diet is WFPB with fish low on the food chain such as Sardines, maybe Salmon and also Bivalves. I don't think adding anything else is beneficial for health and is just for preference.
Off topic, I love the samba/bossa nova music in the videos (brazilian here)😁😬
I eat around 60% of my calories as whole food plant carbs, and I don't find that difficult at all. Protein 15-20%, fat 20-25%.
Yes, I did find that a little odd. Maybe I have to listen again for some missing nuance or context that I didn't pick up the first time. But I don't think so.
Which kind of fat do you use?
@@ritamorim100 Mostly whole foods like nuts, seeds and avocados. Sometimes olive oil and some vegan dark chocolate, and some vegan "butter". Coconut oil to pop my pop corn :-). (Algae oil as a supplement.)
I agree meeting the macro-nutrient percents isn't reasonable but having a different structure is easier but still difficult for most people. They revert. They remain unhealthy. More food counseling is necessary and that takes one-on-one with dieticians and food logging; the first costs money and the second is avoided by most people. So personally, my philosophy is that we need more counseling like is given by Mcdougall's program or the way Esselstyn has in his program.
I'm on a low carb diet eating mostly one meal a day. And for me, I feel no cravings. So it's very easy to stay on it. But it's very interesting that low fat can be a good alternative for some people. As long as you stick to whole foods. It's a very interesting topic.
We probably don't have to replace all of the 40% refined carbs, since we already eat too much.
good point
My biggest takeaway from this discussion is that there is no such thing as a perfect test for nutrition. Unless you have your test subjects locked away for years and they only receive what you feed them, then the data will be skewed. And even if everything were perfect, the differences in people's physiological makeup will skew the results as well.
And if the test subjects were locked up for a long time, that in itself could be a major confounder.
And food journals by the subjects themselves are quite bad. This is why is why China study was critical
@@Dan16673 Although in many studies, the food frequency questionnaires are periodically validated through measures such as measuring specific biomarkers. In the best cases, FFQs are predictive of various facets of one’s health status. Also, some cohorts, such as health professionals, are better than others in their FFQ reporting.
Why don’t more nutritionists speak about the Blue Zone study? As they seem to support what this particular specialist is speaking too.
That's because Blue Zone studies are designed terribly and do not meet the requirements for scientific rigor. Mostly mechanistic speculation without the needed outcome based data from quality studies in humans.
They don't speak about it because it doesn't exist. There are individual studies of people within what is called the Blue Zone, but no such thing as a Blue Zone Study. One example is the 7th Day Adventist studies that have been going on for decades.
Wow that was so insightful, the doctor was so well spoken and got his ideas through very eloquently. I would love to read some of his research.
Thank you for the information
Low carb is the most studied and obviously beneficial diet for humans. A lot of people just don’t do it correctly. It’s clear to me he hasn’t run the experiments himself because hitting these macro percentages is super basic a easy. There’s a week or two educational portion then tweaking from there.
I am still confused. Doesnt all the bluezones eat predominantly plant based? They have the highest average lifespan? Also vegans has the lowest BMI of all the groups? Why isnt lifespan the most important indicator of the best diet? From what I understand the bluezones eat a high carb low protein diet?
Yes to all based on most data. Lifespan and quality of the life you live which longest lived populations tend to have both. But from what I understand researchers are still looking at genetics and how our individual microbiomes adapt. Video by U of California on how we process drugs based on our microbiota. Good independent science always builds on past studies and never afraid to question what is accepted. Knowledge is based on the past. There maybe no best diet for billions of us but we do share 98.5-99% DNA (that we know to date.) I hope we evolve past sides, labels and chasing profit to focus on cooperation vs competition to advance science for all humans. We’re def not there. Until then think critically independently and use your instincts. (FWIW background is nutritional science but w/respect not equal to those in video).✌️
Great interview! 👏🏼
Thanks & shared 🌱🖖🏼
Great interview.
There is something that is bugging me though. In the 1999 to 2016 study about macronutriment content of the US diet, what is shown is that the proportions of each macro (and macro "type" aka crappy carbs vs good carbs or saturated vs unsaturated fat) have stayed relatively stable.
The only macro that is slightly but significantly decreasing seems to be the crappy carbs.
That being said and correct me if I am wrong: it seems that cardiovascular & metabolic diseases are on the rise, but the study suggests that the macro profile of the average american diet have not changed for 20 years except for the % of crappy carbs going slightly down.
Therefore: how to explain the rise in cardio and metabolic diseases ? Is it that we are just starting to see the people who started this poor diet 20 years ago getting sick or might it be unrelated to diet ? Maybe the rise is rather due to sedentarity, lack of PA.
My point is not that those two facts (rise in diseases & steady macro profile over 20 years) show that diet is not important just that it does not seem to be able to explain the increase in disease (unless maybe the people from 20 years ago are only just starting to get sick today?).
more sedentary lives with more or less the same, poor diet gets my vote. others blame the addition of HFCS in the 70s in the US as part of US-ag policy to subsidize corn production. But I think that's the tail wagging the dog- cheap food additive as refined carbs going into everything we eat (bumping up the 'crap carbs' % you see being relatively flat in the data presented). Then we had that 'fat is the enemy' phase in the 80s and 90s which was a total boondoggle as obseity rates and metabolic/cardiovascular disease rates continued to climb upwards, in lock-step with our average waist-lines.
From what I understood is that the recommendations were basically the same throughout the years, not that people actually ate them. Science has not really change that much in view of nutrition throughout the years, if only people would listen and follow what is recommended, so you see people doing otherwise and then even the USDA, I think has changed the food pyramid many times, where at one point they were stressing very low fat, and all these companies started producing a proliferation of low fat or fat free foods that was full of sugar. People started gaining weight. But that was not science, science was basically still telling people to eat whole foods, mostly plants but some protein, but people were not following that
Not necessarily hard to eplain. Psychological stress is proven to be paramount in cardiovascular disease (via stress hormones and blood pressure etc) and cancer and pretty much all disease that isn't genetically determined (a vast minority of all diseases). Diet is likely vastly over estimated vis a vis psychology in this regard..